Inheritance, the Prodigal Son and Interest in “Interest”

When I began composing articles for this website it was as if I was a literary infant. Only while I fondly look back at scribbles in dusty journals do I see the core that was me remains intact, unblemished. It is what I have become.  Notably writing projects have grown into something much more expansive; substantially more substantive in many instances, presumably because I am much more proficient at the art of journalism. Nevertheless echoes of past enlightened symmetry still tantalisingly haunt. Whilst die-hard readers used to my familiar elaborate prose have witnessed an evolution of sorts, the more conventional style of recent entries is no less controversial. They are controversial but not abnormal it might be argued.  Even so, rhetoric is regularly too far adrift of sensationalised reason to covet “normalcy” in any sense of the word. It could be said my writings propose a uniquely different perspective which in itself is conspicuous evidence of sovereignty “apud esse”; something all humans strive for to some degree, but oh so few attain. In celebration of my largely discarded history, I have decided to attempt to revisit the past. My intention is to make this piece shorter, simpler [can I say?] in festival of the old but not forgotten me.

Is it possible to effectively resurrect the past?

Well that question will be answered presently.

Reflecting on my journey to date, I recall how, in dull moments, I would instinctively jot down a line or two, a solitary paragraph and other evidence of burning thoughts. None of these were suitable as standalone products for ambitious journalistic campaigns, of course. Logic dedicated a “to be written” folder to these moments and, over time, this has gathered fragments like moss to the old miller’s stone. Given my aim to regenerate dormant thinking, the “to be written” folder seemed the most valid first port of call for this episode. It is definitely fitting that the origins of my resurrection are founded in the rediscovery of misplaced parchments. In this case the scrap I selected consisted of a single page upon which was scribed one line of text in addition to the title. Intriguingly, these coarsely jumbled words appeared to nonchalantly identify an apparently related “unrelated” coincidence. The crux of the observation posited an “irony” over Federal Reserve banknotes, which are subject to 3% interest from the issuer (United States of America), paid annually, The coincidence noted that America (after a historic referendum) also dedicates a minimum of 3% of the gross national budget to “defence” which, in this case, is attack (messianic wars “for peace”).

Above this poignant inscription was the demure title “Interest in “interest””, which seemed the most fetching at the time, though, other than the, I must say, rather cheesy pun, the original “point” is now completely lost to me. After earning the judicial reputation of being an unabashed merchant of “tough love”, I would hate my inquisition to form any bias towards fashionably calculated schemes that formularise common opinions on “things in general”. Persuading those of low vibrational frequency that the devil is in the detail goes beyond motive. That is my vocation and, thus, I recommend anyone ill prepared to consider everything to the “nth degree” is not in a viable position to validate or express truth. Perhaps this rather crass example may suffice to service the analogy?

When someone dies of a gunshot wound motivated by an aggressive attack what perpetrates the murder? Is it the gun inventor, designer, maker, owner or user with malice in his heart? Is the gun itself, the operator, the bullets that caused the fatal wound or the gunpowder that ignites deadly blows at fault? If the shooter is a soldier or policeman, for instance, do the “rules” for murder eerily change? Could we blame the environment, the timeline or engrained political intrigue?

And on and on we can debate.

Revisiting the past is one thing, but I don’t fancy repeating myself is very constructive. Whether produced by the Federal Reserve or not, money’s passé. We also all know it’s the root of all evil (although perhaps not “why” it’s the root of all evil). Many of my prior articles have touched on the topic. This one in particular goes some way towards exploring primary issues.  Nevertheless I concluded the standalone title “interest in interest” was insufficient for that cause. It needed to be widened or scrapped unless I chose a different path. Any form of censorship (however remote) is destruction of the past – hardly fodder for a celebration of reawakening. Therefore Integrity determined my only legitimate choice was to expand the title at all cost as I had no intention of wandering aimlessly in search of ambition. Fortunately “eureka” eruptions reward those with brilliance. What, lacking before, profoundly related to “interest” could be worthy enough for a role or roles in a high impact title? Thinking aloud, it came to me in a flash. Does not interest “prove” the justification for inheritance and ownership?  Inheritance is undeniably one of if not “the” foundation stone of profiting interests.

I would need to summon up a title profoundly deserving of these widened considerations. After much internal reflection, I did eventually find words that will hopefully fashion as a perfect compromise.  They are, in order, “Inherence, the Prodigal Son and Interest in ‘Interest””. This is the resulting effort that is designated as official title of this essay unless something obsessively changes the contextual direction of ideas and their natural progressions. Otherwise no further review is planned.

Now let me explain why the “prodigal son” was also selected for its part in the essential treatise theme. Intrinsically linked to inheritance, prodigal sons are no ordinary offspring. Therefore, simply, that was the “missing piece” I needed to complete the title. It also presented investigative goals worth chasing, investigation that needs to determine what makes these prodigal sons so special. Of course primary analysis did upturn the blissfully obvious. Basically, these male progeny are gifted enough to be cultivated, which is usually in the family direction.  Otherwise, why bother to cultivate? Way back, when elites ruled the world, families with “everything to lose” produced governors and gatekeepers for their kingdoms. Along the lines of this protocol, security over tenure became a family’s greatest priority and ensured at least one son was encouraged (putting it nicely) to enter the military at rank. Another would become a doctor or a priest (isn’t that odd?) and then the following (perhaps the most strategically important) would be groomed to act as lawyer, preferably under government. Black sheep or dropouts would eventually come round to becoming merchants, stock holders or artists. The rigours of this big, bad world ensure safe, easy options are usually preferred.

Before I press on with on with the good stuff, I need to do a little more reflection by way of background. People, I have noticed, have a fondness towards procrastination (mentioned last article too) and a crippling fear of criticism. Procrastination, at best, fuels truths-of-sorts. That is the reality and that is why I try my upmost not to procrastinate. It can be a hindrance because, through my personal discovery tour; I have found some values, ideas and beliefs I used to stand by were either flawed or false. Consequentially, many years ago, I used to regularly bloviate with erudite confidence. There was never anything more than “personal convictions” to back up my gift of the gab, but I rarely found anyone I met could contest my position on the state of things in general. More recently, I have become alert, ever wary of falling into the trap of believing my own bullshit. Criticisms (where valid) counter any opportunity for imperfect procrastinations to take hold, so I see these as causal blessings. Procrastinators, for the record, focus on symptoms or phantom symptoms in deference to causes. Truth givers expose the root.

Therefore if I am to do apt justice to “Inheritance, the Prodigal Son and Interest in “Interest”” all stones must be upturned so as not to grind out more unanswered, “impossible to resolve” niggling queries. I must, instead, disrobe all root causes to unveil the exhilarating detail. Thought and responding responses will require latitude, much latitude. Mountains of propagandas dating back to the dawn of time have had the mesmerising effect of misleading sane discovery to such a degree, befuddled judgments are the function of normalcy. Even some of the great minds of our era are consistently turned to fudge by certain conventions. This is why I focus on topics others simply wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole. True thinking outside of the box comes without a parachute. Even so, rather than drawing on possible conjectures as “sources of evidence”, my strategy (in motion) is to apply logic and purposeful reason to every concept I am at pains to illustrate.

Let us be sure where the “baseline” is. Currently materialist-atheist “edict” controls the way logic is directed. Per this “view”, the implication is purpose is a symptom compounded from random effects of existence, even though (as Rupert Sheldrake has wittily pointed out), by this account, more incontrovertible miracles were created at the dawn of time than Jesus could have ever fancied. (Alien to this mindset) in fact purpose must underline causes because existence was “crafted”. The evidence existence was crafted is found in its design, which is clear and unarguably transparent.

So to do justice to the quest, I may have to introduce suspects or considerations that have rarely or, perhaps, never been pondered before. All the little tweety birds that believe puffing various forms of political correctness is their branch to salvation beware, for this big bad eagle may swoop down and devour you and your branch whole. We should begin with no misconceptions. Those that initiated the process that conceived elitism (or, in other words, the hubris of “prison planet”) demonstrated extraordinary cunning. It seems obvious to me that, considering how the process has radically evolved (in the engineering sense), higher forces beyond this realm have had involvement every step of the way. Not dwelling on possible superstitions, the whys and the wherefores, however pertinent, I intent to expose the chassis of the fabric of the illusion that is today’s “reality”. Conspiracy networks have been installed so elegantly, it is as if they have been commissioned by God Almighty.

Before I discuss inheritance, it is important to review something much more primordial.  We take friendships for granted. They just happen. Or do they just happen? Our first friendships are with family or extended family. Managing relationships with our family members teaches us how to distinguish friends from enemies. These teach us politics (affairs of the people). They teach us who we can influence and who we will let influence us. A trade of sorts is communicated. Eventually we form close knit groups of likeminded kindred spirits. Perhaps not directly considered such, we are all elitist in the way we resolutely preserve our group cultures. When stretched out into the wider community and beyond, we expand into other political networks. Some present revolutionary, but not conflicting ideas.  These see us progress, in some cases. Some ideas are so common they become universalised. Politicians naturally capitalise on, exploit and manipulate these phenomena.

Eventually draconian laws are destined to twist what was original goodwill into all kinds of overt tyrannies in order to elevate elite elitist cultures. Laws have always been the basis for kingdoms. Under this principle, every king has ruling power. However, without friendships there would be no alliances to back the laws and politics that founded them would be rendered superfluous and obsolete. No king could rule. In addition, under these conditions, though commerce would be possible, other than as a tool of oppression, inheritance could have no functional purpose. It would also mean people would be forced to discover the truth if they were motivated that way. They could no longer rely on friends’ redigested second and third hand opinions that sounded right.

As it stands “Inheritance” is one of the golden keys to open Pandora’s Box.  In a distant era populated by long forgotten customs and attitudes, it was exclusively the domain of the elites. At that time land was free, commoners outside metropolises were largely ungoverned and there was no sense of ownership (per modern standards). Individuals congregated into clans and these became long standing settlements which then saw homesteads passed down from generation to generation. But there was no registered ownership. If some place was occupied and sympathetically unavailable, sound conscience determined it was off limits. When the “universalisation” of deeds of ownership tied to symptomatic inheritance of chattel began is hard to calculate. In “western society”, I would argue that the abolishment of “slavery” (social security) led to the effective enslavement of man. Inheritance then evolved to become a quasi-version of the “frills” of slavery. “Rights” would be proscribed by authorities unless aspects of commoners’ common law were considered relevant (to seamless elite governance of slaves). In this case any reflectively worthy laws were drafted as supplants to legislated corporate manifestos. It goes without saying administrators of guidelines were systemised lackeys incapable of virtuous judgement. Finally, courtesy of banking and insurers, everything could be “valued” and that “worth” represented by tokens of interest (whether that is gold/silver bars, coins or promissory notes).

In order to engage lawyers and accountants whose role (in the grand elites’ scheme) is to professionalise ownership, receipt of inheritance follows a litany of potential administrative hurdles, but I don’t wish to dwell on this. There is another internet resource I like to reference occasionally that specialises (in part) on whistle blowing messy probates, the fallout from inheritance. Pure Professional Journalism Gazette can be located here.

In addition, philosophy behind inheritance capitalises on the principle of appreciation or depreciation and this is clearly an expansion of the dependent interest bearing investment culture. Probate relies on belief in heirlooms, which are presumed to indefinitely financially mature. Government, per this reasoning, rakes in their “fair share” from the commerce evolution in taxes in order to theoretically provide ever improving infrastructures and representative management frameworks. Accommodating this theory, surpluses could be redistributed for other pressing voters’ needs. That is why I believe all governments (on paper, at least) are kept “in the red” deliberately. In fact, when truth is laid bare, government, though never limited, does little more than give inheritance necessary tinges of authenticity to make people believe in its credibility. If it is taxed, it “must be for real”. Without profits, commerce becomes obsolete. Interest is, by circumstance, both a symptom of and agent in confirmation of profits.

Truth laid bare goes way beyond mere commerce and inheritance. The tyranny actually began with registered ownership because, without deeds, commerce is arbitrary. Barter doesn’t cater for profits. Here is why the imperialists concocted their “survival of the fittest” mantra and continue to lord it as nature’s divine plan. The fittest are considered the best at coveting what they have scavenged (the nice word for stole). I apologise for dispelling with the hocus-pocus, but acknowledgement of ownership as something that is righteous and Godly only grossly and deviously distorts reality in favour of tyranny against the divine. Aside from  modern day [ADL fabricated) Racism fraud, the reason certain peoples have been temporarily “classed” as savages is to remove any contest over conquered (stolen) land spoils (“animals” cannot own land). Notably in Africa, America and Australia, “white man” thieved most of the habitable land areas. Repatriation (a pathetic attempt at feigning “fairness”) in some cases has seen the return of lands considered commercially unviable. Even so, generally speaking, when it comes to origins of ownership, judicial mechanisms continue to work off the ludicrously partisan principle “finders’ keepers”.

The net effect of that is another of those atheistic miracles. Our impotent, voiceless God apparently blesses open sacrilege. Was the principle finders’ keepers ever to be condemned and abolished, commerce would cease to exist. This is a big statement. Some might contest it. Here’s an analogy which should amply validate its authority. I don’t own the royal grounds, approximating three square miles, close to the heart of Tokyo, Japan. Under the auspices of lack of ownership, no one would own the land. Therefore, I decree some legitimacy in laying claim on that which is not owned. Hypothetically, I could establish a real estate agency to sell off my theoretical acquisition. I may be able to attract teams of would be buyers. Yet, without binding contracts and infrastructures supporting them, verifiable presumption of intent to abide by the law, the land is worthless until someone or some group manufactures political legitimacy. The ancient Romans couldn’t give money away to the Britons because they did not believe in it.

The reason (under this system) ownership will never be abolished (although it may be restricted) is governments would have to rescind their slave master statuses in order to transform into arbitrators that truly work “for the people”. Currently populations are effectively forced to toil to survive. Those privileged enough to “own” sufficient land holdings supported by interest bearing investments probably haven’t the skills to become entirely self-sufficient. Thus, without government society would naturally function through the formation of brokered relationships that would need to leverage and harness social parasitism. According to today’s popular press (sponsored by corporate interests and governments who are in themselves giant corporations), people only want good jobs. People, by the same rose tinted reasoning, will do anything to keep their good jobs. Commerce needs labour to function. Indeed, for those that were (in society) to ever become self-sufficient, commerce would cease to be necessary. That lack of functional necessity could only be defeated by interest in collectables and other objet d’art which, though arguably functionally irrelevant, fuel a potentially ever-accruing “need for more”. I guess that is why we have collectors.

It is important to understand the relevance of commerce, because many “goods and chattels” from the inheritance perspective may be deemed valueless. The family’s pink plastic clock that ticked you to sleep as a baby is worth nothing (even though it may be priceless to you) compared against your departed father’s prestigious “medal winning” coin collection that you were never “allowed” to touch, which insurance would class as a valuable asset. Many factors can determine an heirloom’s worth. Rarity, age, condition, popularity affects status of all antique items. Statuses are groomed from fostered traditions. For instance, Caucasian Australian manufactured artefacts offered for sale would likely be priced at many multiples of any vaguely comparable Aboriginal counterparts. In line with this ideology, the essential education of all well-connected prodigal sons provides a vital comprehension of firstly how the system functions and then, as importantly, how stepping stones to credentials gift “keys to the kingdom”.

Unsurprisingly a correct (for purposes of social elevation) education is priced beyond the means of not-so-humble slaves, which proposes a vicious circle whereby only elite or “fortunate” working class families can avail the system. Indeed for the system (which some argue began with William Cromwell at Westminster) to permanently function as it is, the riff-raff could never be involved in any authoritative managerial capacity. So, with the exception of very occasional “pliable” geniuses, credentials of note are off limits to ordinary folks. Rebellious or revolutionary geniuses are invariably spurned by those that might have empowered them unless their significances were so timely that to trade would persuade the only logical course forward. The powers never favour constructive partnerships. That wick always burns fast and furious. Why would recalcitrant free thinkers ever be viscerally rewarded by a system that choses to repress or oppress most forms of independent thought?

From the (dare I say?) “Conspiratorial perspective”, certain specialised training qualifications that are destined to open doors to those prized “good jobs” are invariably only available to those with educational credentials usually off limits to working classes. Hindsight is a wonderful attribute. In many instances only those in the know (or, rather, with “connections”) have inside information as to which skills to acquire for guaranteed success. Thus, just about all “good jobs” are snapped up by exclusive circles privy to their occurrences. Propaganda permeates a much wider circle of influence which, in part, is designed to operationally program the masses. I can but assume the Clintons were firmly behind the cruel and childish media attacks on Chelsea as a young adult. The design (aided by unflattering images), in this case, was to chide ignorant people into “believing” she was “ugly” so as to ward off any potential for successful unsuitable suitors’ advances. Media tactics of this kind are regularly analysed by Jon Rappoport. I strongly recommend investigation of his writings.

Few seem to be able to come to terms with the extent of the complexity of propagandas. Perhaps this is because everyone attempts to deny their own relative indoctrination or, worse still, it is the summary evidence of their root systemisation. Propagandas are everywhere. They are not merely limited to the mainstream and institutionalised “sciences’ (sic). Much deceptive information has been generated about computer viruses, for instance. One of the great lies that seems as though it will stand the test of time forever is Pasteur’s germ theory. Germs, according to Pasteur, can invade and infect any body and this is completely untrue. On the back of the lie, scientists concoct legions of “organised germs” that conveniently follow the program. They label these mysteriously unidentified legions’ “viruses”. Of course, if medical evidence free of Pasteur’s contaminated propaganda was given the opportunity to incubate reasoned appraisal, results would radically dishonour current standard opinions in the same manner Bruce Lipton somehow defeated all biological cells.

As Pasteur was nothing short of an appendage of “corporate science” which had been set up by the Rothschild family in Paris in the late eighteenth century (just after the “revolution” – sic), any marketing device aiding the manufacture of arbitrary confusion to help everyone “believe” would be regarded as a godsend by those that presume they own the world. Their godsend in specific relation to the case I highlight is “computer viruses”. Computer viruses are not even remotely comparable to any medical counterpart, but propaganda agents don’t care. In fact origins of all computer viruses can be traced back to sponsored hackers testing security effectiveness of networked equipment, but that muddies the objective of paradigm synthesis. To the propagandist it only successfully sells the “concept” germs can and will invade and infect with impunity whether via the internet or other routes. The idea that anyone connected to humans is potentially “networked” with dangerously contaminated aliens is the perfect genre extension. Because, in this specific case, “viruses” (as labelled) do invade and infect technologies, the propaganda message would go a long way towards convincing shallow minds. I will leave the associated complex good/bad bacteria and strengthened/weakened immune systems’ discussion for another entry.

The great deception is to paint a computer virus as the principled copy of a medical virus.

Using established institutions to routinely dress false positives or negatives as “facts”, places the system in the supreme position of being able to present any fantasy as effective truth, no matter how fantastical. Providing data can be formally argued and expressed in particular ways, any antipathy of reality is up for believable persuasion. There are actually no laws of science (physics). There are only laws of existence (to the atheists’ dismay) which can theoretically be placed under scrutiny of sciences. An excellent example of how current etiquette can end up bamboozling itself is found in various expressions of interest that emerged considering the effectiveness of a new energy generating prototype heralding from Italy a few years ago. I have lost source details, but can verify corporate backers in favour of the machine presented analytical notes interpreting data that illustrated the device was going to be a magnificent success. Competitors insisted the exact same data was unrequited “proof” the machine would never work by their account. Would be investors coming somewhere in the middle couldn’t or wouldn’t speculate either way. Similar “analysis” has been made regards the Bosnian “Pyramids”. The duly diligent will see it everywhere.

In addition, to aid propagandists’ purposes, word values (such as “gay”) are routinely changed or even reversed in order to lambast popular interpretations. Late Nicolai Levashov (his family incidentally claims he was “murdered by Zionists” in 2012) and other genre academics have argued this restructuring of language began in earnest in mother Russia just after the 1917 bankers’ invasion. Let’s face it; “interest” is a profoundly positive word that surely inspires persuasive popularity. That is why it was given to “utopian” banking commissions (which will always be viewed in an eternally positive light) in my opinion. Finally, those that do not consider insistence on and observance of balanced truthfulness is the only viable promotional standards’ benchmark are propagandists, whether they acknowledge the fact or not. Propagandists are in the business of manufacturing beliefs, period. Truth that doesn’t support or actually impedes the manufacturing process is unwelcome. Any devices, such as changing word values, fake science and so forth are more than welcome. Discerning would-be “Manchurian Candidates” is trickier, but, I would imagine those that assure religious adherence to product “use by” dates are well and truly in the crisis zone. The vegetarian that “doesn’t like” meat isn’t far behind.

Money is only supported by the “belief” in its value. That particular belief has become the most potently powerful and universally entrancing factor in the control of man. Thus, we must acknowledge the scripting of believable beliefs is far more virulent than truths that might support or aid acknowledgement. For example, I wonder if any believer (in money) has considered the fact that financial optimism provides fodder for wars. When the Industrial Revolution was in full swing the 1890’s saw boom times. Boom times make babies; manpower for the First World War? “Roaring” ‘20’s clearly provided “stock” for the Second World War (Germany was billed to “lose”, so their peoples were given fertility stemming poverty on the back of harsh reparations. 1930’s optimism was in preparation for the kingdom of Germany to be rebuilt as a new republic [styled on America] when the war was won).

There are always going to be inconsistencies, such as the infamous 1960’s flower power movement. This is a paradox because it was the only genuine peoples’ revolution in living memory. No attempt was made to synthesise prosperity in the 1970’s because weaponry is becoming so sophisticated, “ape” operators will eventually be found unnecessary (beyond culling populations). Were a few of those bygone hippies “tuned in” enough to realise “Interest” is the nemesis of sovereignty? Being a hippy was all about recognising individual sovereignty. The 3% the Federal Reserve skims off every dollar assures each bill in circulation is worth 97 cents (presuming “government” doesn’t take a cut too). Therefore the owner either has to front the loss or is forced to speculate or trade in order to recoup 3% or more. Imagine the potential for manipulation if Bitcoin or any other e-currency takes hold. That is how the notion of profits was born. The land that is the royal grounds of Tokyo is worthless unless it is rated and valued. It has long been presumed that “highest bidder” nominations assure correct marketplace values, but this isn’t necessarily so.

Abundance does not come without a “price” to those that dedicate themselves to controlling humanity. Population swells lead to the collectivisation of giant metropolises. Without incessant propagandas that “define” normalcy, the “stranger” might persuade “influence charisma” of comparable or greater power than corporate bread winners. From that, a rogue messiah or “anti-Christ” could emerge. It is more than possible; probable even. If so, of course there are many ways to quickly dispel unrest. Leaders can be branded occultists, sexual deviants or, worse still, insane.  Anyone fetching that positive diagnosis can be liberally carted off to a very unhealthy institution and indefinitely detained without recourse. As everyone that used to be “evil” now has some sort of psychiatric disorder, biased and unfair claims against can be sinisterly effective. How well did Jesus fare against the Pharisees in face of the cross? How are mental illnesses “healed”? Well to answer that, there is a litany of tested drug cocktails perfect at prepping would-be “Manchurian Candidate” assassins without causes from recalcitrant, inspirational free-thinkers.  Two birds killed with one stone, maybe?

Totalitarian Brands: He Who Controls the Gold “Wins”

Introduction to Totalitarian Brands

Before embarking on my longest blog entry to date, I had originally conceived the title Totalitarian Brands, but to do justice to accrued research data would have required at least a hundred blank sheets. As this (in word format) equates to roughly 50,000 words, with every page filled, I would easily have had enough content to compile a small book should have I taken up the challenge. Indeed, emphasis on the greatest corporate brand, paedophilia, might inspire dozens of paragraphs alone, given the lack of fortitude and basis elsewhere. However, the great journalists’ guide, if there was such a thing, would surely advise writers that readers’ attention spans are limited at best, so I feared scrutiny would be stretched beyond the max if I entertained this mountainous quest in addition to supplements covering far wider, more convoluted antagonisms. Therefore I, being of sound mind, have already part scripted “”The powers’” great accolade: Brand Pedo” for a future Ozzie Thinker entry and will say no more on the subject now.

This essay will still keep the original title idea, Totalitarian Brands. “He who controls the gold wins” is the first of a number of topical segments. Accordingly, this one reflects on feudalism, royalty, coinage, currency, ownership and other things generally related. What would a political article be without terrorists? Accordingly I have scheduled an intro to my feisty fellow Arab-American crime fighter, Mantiq-Al-Tayr. That said, given this post is my longest to date (remember that bit about peoples’ attention spans) it will have to be in brief. In summary I would like to present conclusions that indisputably outline the tragic connection between ownership, money and war. Reflectively, concordant with that agenda, the whole atheist, fake science paradigm simply replaces or expands on institutionalised religious judicial mass indoctrination.

But, to be clear, we must start at the beginning when there were no brands and God walked with man. According to atheists “God walking with man” could not possibly be so, but I disagree. Beliefs hold so much credence they can construct reality, providing that perception is never tested. If I decide the moon is made of cheese, only visiting the heavenly object will expose the belief. Therefore, providing I never rocket to the heavens, my belief will be held sacred. Of course, for our “all knowing” atheists the reverse is so. To honestly assert belief in the total absence of anything requires absolute knowledge of everything to back it up; otherwise erstwhile glib sentiment is no different to that of those dreamers of cheesy moons. The atheism syndrome (and that is all it is) highlights a deliberate ignorance.

It is a cult that was founded on the assumption that God is all-consuming (the trendy way of saying everywhere). When something’s everywhere, theoretically you don’t have to look very far to find it, agreed. Yet, what these occultists fail to take into consideration is they might just be looking at things entirely in the wrong way. My book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, outlines the right way. Brand perception is essential for marketeers of totalitarian propaganda campaigns. Strict homage to materialism allows impressions to disseminate “correct thinking” towards their causes. Vagaries of wilfully dishonest and divisive interpretations of truth create the modern day dichotomy that distorts good sense into hybrid fantasy. Truth takes a back seat to totalitarian passion. Logic and reason are consumed by branded emotion to stir ignorant multitudes.

Communist, atheist material belief systems expand new commerce frontiers

Recently a Facebook heckler gave feedback that my articles are opinion pieces. To a degree, this is correct, but has an article ever been written that is opinion free? All journalism imbues lavish alliterations which deliberately foment ambitions geared to enhancing branded truth. Choice of words and inflections is tantamount. For arbitrary bodies’ hell bent on universal control, meanings of the words that stick in the throat can be changed over time. Nikolai Levashov, for instance, observed a number of popular Russian terms were given opposite meanings after the Communist takeover that is labelled revolution (sic). This, he outlines, was a deliberate and effective strategy geared towards shaping new opinions and a new ethos that both backed off of and contradicted old order.

When I talked about only God and man at the beginning, Introducing atheists was a ploy. You see atheism is all about commerce and nothing to do with divinity. With no God, legitimate “finders’ keepers” can claim “discoveries” from conquest or exploration. America was found on this principle and that is why administrative arbitrators legitimised stakes to claims. If God was to be factored at any point, free land was originally stolen [from God]. Ownership is a synthetic manmade system. It is not wide ranging or far reaching; quite the reverse. It supports that (or, more importantly, those) which is “privy to” contractual order. Therefore, as the American natives were obsolete as far as the white invaders were concerned, contracts always forfeited their moral claims until commercial stakeholders saw advantage from philosophic reversal.

Atheism has become more than a cult. It is an accessory to the de-spiritualisation of mankind. Those destined to control are not merely content with their fake ownership contracts. They also want to manufacture nature. For instance, with no almighty God at the helm, nature is a balance confined to survival of the fittest. War, by this determination, attempts to validate the natural progression of order. Yet, in truth, all conflicts are a consequence of ownership. The most cherished of all things that are owned is an individual’s life (self). Therefore, per utopian logic, the root of all disputes (pre-empting “war”) would be anything that is deemed to undermine self-interest (or, in plainer words, selfishness). Ownership, many fail to realise, will always only be as good as the belief in the contracts that substantiate the concept. A concept is all ownership will ever be and it is that what binds legacies ratified by terms of inheritance after every life eventually fades into oblivion.

Belief systems are pivotal for the manufacture of assuming audiences. Without visceral pointed mob views, brands are finished, so the group is programmed to squeeze out individual innovators, pioneers and revolutionaries unless they are the new trend setters. For instance, Christian “truther” networks spare no effort in emphasising criticism demonstrating how mainstream Medias are rigged to suit the wishes of corporate peers (governments rarely amount to anything more than corporate sponsors). Yet, by the same token, the majority of articles, bulletins and paraphernalia produced by these networks are more biased, militantly partisan and truth lacking than the arenas they condemn. Even so, dirty “lies” buried in the mainstream are very deceptive indeed, so I would still judge that the greater evil of the two. Besides, alternative activism caters for beatniks whereas the other tragic resource, when in tune, wholeheartedly supports a perpetual corporate totalitarian agenda. Statistically, the mainstream supposedly fuels and is the majority (or populist) view. If this is and remains so, mankind has a world of worry ahead.

Hidden past truths might divine present and future prophecy

I make no effort to disguise the fact that I share Joseph P Farrell’s opinion that the banking system (or commerce) paved the way for kings and then religions to execute order. To be more precise, I believe humanity was rebuilt using this tried and tested way to progress civilisation after the collapse of Atlantis. Religions were “the Law” and “justice systems” combined. That is why the Pharisees (dissenters or usurpers) were both religious leaders and judges of the ancient Israelites. The reason one interpretation of the meaning of the word Pharisee is “hypocrite” was some Israelites set about to pervert all the prehistoric Atlantis values of civilisation to create the culture control monster that operates with impunity today. Be very clear on this history. It is very important. Potentially the lost Ark of the Covenant contains stone tablets detailing original Atlantis order. That is why they have never been “found”. “Moses” originally hid them so his cronies could rule by rote in my opinion, unless he settled in Ireland. If that was the case, corruption would have begun any time after his death.

Before I reveal attention to details required to unravel the fraud being painted as historic, scientific and political truth, I would like to offer an example of how reason can be divined with common sense and good calculation. Astute visitors will notice the “Profile of the Gnostic Jesus” section here. The name “Jesus” is presumed to first appear in the New Testament accounts of the Bible (and some of the contemporary Dead Sea Scrolls). Of the main canon, colloquially known as the Four Gospels, no original manuscripts have survived, so it is impossible to [precisely] determine what languages were used for the autographs. Thus, lexicons might and do argue the name Jesus is a Greek (although there is no letter “J” in that tongue and the Hebrew alphabet has a provision for all sounds creating the name) derivative from Aramaic Yeshua.

In addition, presuming Yeshua has anything to do Jesus is a preconception, mitigated only by the fact it is the closest sounding Aramaic name that might be compared to Jesus. Insomuch, arguments are clearly fuelled by the desire to satisfy a particular narrative line; i.e. in this case original texts were produced in the everyman tongue, Aramaic. That purpose is aimed at deflecting serious consideration as to the abnormality of the word Jesus and the formal contemporary religious significance of doctrines associated with the name that blossomed into the Christian Church. Predictable organic growth of an average Jewish man [into something he wasn’t] offers the avenue to explain away those theoretical divine powers as merely metaphorical or wishful thinking. If Jesus was not one of a range of names that were used prior to and over the contemporary period, why did the subsequently wide usage (particularly in Latin communities) as a given name take hold? In effect, totalitarian propagandists have etched a character from the tradition that is part of a wave of change. Jesus, the individual, whilst not being superfluous, is rendered rather impotent or misunderstood by that religious systemisation.

The Holy Blood and Holy Grail is hybrid catholic-Zionist totalitarianism

There is another strange, enigmatic, dare I say contemporary once more, character called Josephus, who, inexplicably, shares a potentially unique name with Jesus. The Pharisaic old guard blast on about his birth name being ordinary Joseph Ben Matityahu (Joseph son of Matthias), but this might also be poppycock and only evidence of Scarlet Pimpernel covering his tracks, given that there are no other contemporary clues or tangible documents beyond the written legacy of Josephus about his own life. The additional claim that he adopted Flavius (Roman royal) in homage to the Emperor, in spite of his father’s proto-kingly status as a high priest of the bloodline of David, no less, is so preposterous it’s almost laughable. The only decent response to that is, pull the other one Zionists, it’s got bells on.

It seems to me that Josephus represented the creation of a fusion of two royal orders (each characterised by his given and surname) and the reason the (presumed) medieval additions to the main biblical canon talk of Joseph as the father of Jesus is they more pertinently give clues as to Josephus’ father’s status/history. Jesus’ attack on the money changers outside the temple (which might not have existed) was so out of place, it was contextually clearly presenting a different person. Given the textual symmetry and character of minor agitator, Barabbas, he is an ideal candidate for the unrest, arrest, imprisonment and crucifixion. He must have been spared actual crucifixion, either because passer by Simon Cyrene acted instantia, Joseph of Arimthea negotiated with Pontius Pilate or both, in order to sire Jesus. Biblical accounts of the crucifixion/resurrection take history out of context in order to offer different political metaphors on Gnostic/Pharisaic control of rule of law. Barabbas’ (Justus) common name was Joseph.

In addition, though this may be too great a stretch of the imagination for some, filius is Latin for “son”, so could its abbreviation to “us” have been added to Joseph as the new, hybridised name Josephus with view to inflect “son of Joseph”? I think filius to ph-us in anagrammatic form is a plausible mind stretch. For instance, in prior articles I noted the incomplete Latin anagram “pho(r) Jesus” from letters of Joseph, which means to bear forth Jesus. Searching references for earlier uses of Josephus as a common name, I find none. There are plenty of other clues to this enigma, but the coincidence of two similarly unique names coming from intrinsically linked characters overwhelmingly points to the buried truth that they belong to the exact same identity.

Downhill from Atlantis and a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow

Returning to contemplating the history of how the meaning of civilisation has been distorted to purposefully enslave the masses, it was a minority of Israelites that masterminded a new order championing commercial privilege to the detriment of humanitarian values. In effect, they have slowly and catastrophically systematically usurped the wisdom of Atlantis, brick by brick. They have gradually converted cosmic order into “graded” chaos. Though interest in gold (as a measure) predates Israelite fascination, according to Vedic references of much more ancient origins, cuts of silver were the preferred method of fiscal accountability perhaps stretching back prior to the Atlantis civilisations (originally on Mars!).

It must be said, things of value were scant indeed in those eras so comparisons with modern day corporate rationalisation are impossible. Believe it or not, we live in unique times which have never been tried or tested before. Today, people even pay for manure! That’s the difference. The ownership concept has grown to become an almost universal standard and commerce wastes no opportunity to manipulate and destroy goodwill. Just about all common lands went years ago. Major restrictions are placed on “free” drinking water. Is the air to be regarded as the next great industrialist conquest for the conquistadors? They do still need slaves to toil and buy goods; else commerce would collapse in a heap. But the most current great pioneering “venture” is for power over life and death by controlling illness and the medical fix (a future instalment, “Are Vaccines a Globalist Strategy Being Used to Cull Populations?” is planned)

Of course, these plots neither appeared overnight nor happened by accident. There was extensive planning. Steps of the outline were simple. First off, the parasites needed to convince everyone to use money when and where it hadn’t been used before. Mainstream history records the primary, but very crude, attempt at globalisation being the preoccupation of the Greeks (or presumed Greeks, who were both Israelite Hyksos and the terrible Philistines, in my opinion). No real expansive, persisting commerce strategy was employed beyond loot and pillage by them. Interestingly Alexander the Great and infamous Cleopatra were, reputedly, Macedonians (perhaps even Romanians?) so the ethnic footprint of ancient times would likely confound the populist historical view anyway.

Be that as it may, after the Greeks failed to maintain control and their empire fizzled out, a new Roman (de facto “Greek”?) regime magically appeared to confront the world once more. This time, after the prior dry run, things were better organised (in some ways confirming there was a single adaptable blueprint for order and de facto Greek and Roman puppet masters were bound by identical philosophies). I would have included the ancient Babylonians, but evidence of global conquest is too thin on the ground. Remarkably though, Egyptian wall writings and artefacts have even been found on the Australian and American mainlands so, given time, perhaps a case could be built in favour of the Babylonians originally driving universal chaos. Maree Moore puts compelling arguments for the Israelites as breakaways from the Babylon powerhouse. Michael Tsarion goes further, I am led to believe.

Roman coins and rude Britons

Of all the many innovative Roman strategies, the most illogical (without foresight) and noteworthy is the radical introduction of copper or bronze coinage. I use the term “radical” perhaps inappropriately as there is a copper talisman or coin colloquially known as the Pittsburgh Penny that has been contextually dated at around 200,000BC, so perhaps the Roman imagination was not that great after all. Ancient Israelites considered copper a precious metal as it was accounted for in the three wagon loads of plunder they had collected after “God” ransacked Jericho for them. God is the ultimate totalitarian brand, but more on that later from my friend Mantiq-Al-Tayr. The Greeks, Celts or what passed for ancient Russians predominantly used silver and gold as base values. There is a significant reason for this which will be presented in due course.

Anyway, the Romans didn’t restrict their potentially worthless coinage to Rome. No, copper and bronze talismans were exported in industrial quantities and often buried for locals to find in order to entice other fledgling nations into the commerce trap. History has shown the Celts knew better as modern day treasure seekers are still digging up the Roman refuse. Indeed, the only way they could entice British chieftains to take a mild interest in compliance was by salting each trove with silver or gold. Given the Druids administered a system of pantheism which elevated the harvest festival, these were blissful times of peace and humanity, only interrupted by occasional silly squabbles between ill-disciplined cultural leaders.

After their disastrous British campaign, the Romans determined the Brits made lousy hosts, business partners and slaves. Besides, staying would have risked destroying the jewel of exalted heritage (that which separated the aristocrats from plebeians). Just about all the great mystery schools and colleges (some say over 100) were located in what has now become England’s mainland, Glastonbury, Avalon included. Learning was courtesy of breakaway Israelites; the Druids. Is it any wonder those original teachings have been “lost” too? Global elites still flock to prestigious public schools Eton and Harrow, the great universities at Oxford and Cambridge or the London School of Economics.

Her status as the seat of learning is an essential clue demonstrating Britain was or became the mythical Promised Land. In this capacity she has been used as a yard stick for globalist totalitarian policy ambition. Not only that, researchers can see which initiatives have stuck, i.e. Middle Ages feudalism wasn’t an accident of the times. It was a massive step forward and feather in the cap of the global control agenda. Consequentially, other countries have gone further. For instance, the Buddhists imposed ridiculously savage measures on the people of Tibet to uphold totalitarian ideals, lest those that see safety in religious dogma forget. Praise God the atheist Chinese intervened! As expressed earlier, the ultimate plan for globalisation was drafted in Atlantis times (over 10,000 years ago) and corrupted into an unmoving agenda that relentlessly rolls on.

Conquest, currency and control

Celtic coins in circulation prior to Roman occupation of Britain were all called Staters and, I presume, this was because those tokens were only issued to instruments of State (chieftains and so on). Instead, the Romans had gold “pounds” or libres (freedom) for the ruling classes. Silver “shilling” solodi (denoting intelligence) were for the merchant aristocrats. Plebeians had to be satisfied with copper/bronze pennies or denarii (meaning a farmer’s dowry or ten asses). Though those who study coinage of the extended Roman periods may disagree with my gross over-simplification, order was basically punctuated through coinage. This is not about metal scarcity, although lack of metal stock did negate the mint (which means “silver”) of occasional gold solodi and silver denarii.

Roman coinage encapsulated ideals. Doubtlessly, other attributes can be found in the analysis of the argenteus, nummus, laureate, miliarense and so on. The point is that there were/are far rarer metals that could have been used to augment value if rarity was the objective. Not only did the British system pretty much adopt simplified Roman currency measures up to modern day pre-decimalisation, but gold has always outstripped silver value too. It is duly noted industrialists periodically play act to create the illusion markets are spontaneous, but never once has silver come even close to overtaking gold value.

Further evidence supporting Britain as the Promised Land and the next step after Roman tyranny is Queen Victoria’s empire. Her conquests were so wide ranging they expanded beyond the Greek and Roman globalisation campaigns to conquer one quarter of the globe. Factoring incestuous royal connections, the entire Earth was largely property of the elites by World War One. Even arctic regions and other hard to get to places were grabbed as a consequence of (or, perhaps, part of the reason for) World War Two. Though a theoretical World War Three began in 1984 it has been concerning who controls political commercial rights designated for eventual administration by a United Nations/NATO global federalism cooperative. The formal end of sovereign royalty was symbolised by the murder of Russian Tsar Nicholas II 17^th July 1918. Compelling data suggests the Romanov dynasty was installed by the Rothschilds 1775 (a year before American Independence) and removed by the same basic stakeholders.

When World War Three is “won”, “Law making” will still be outsourced to Israel, of course, unless that centre is moved for security reasons. Other nations’ boundaries won’t noticeably change, unless puppet leaderships prove impossible to manage. Currently commerce favours large bodies of people to be broken up. Weaken the national voice enough then trouble makers are easier to silence seems to be the reasoning. Besides, the CIA, NSA and other noteworthy propaganda agencies have armies of internet dissenters poised to drown out any sincere pleas for help. Given the latest American mass shootings (if “real”), I should mention the FBI manipulates “vice” (per Puritan/Pharisaic ideals). Historically, it is also worth adding, Roman Order became Catholicism and, via United Nations hybrid New Age philology, the Pope is now the most influential individual man on the planet. Sure, the Buddhists have tried to muscle in with their Dalai Lama, but is he not doing the New Age pas de pas too? NATO is a branch of the Pentagon which is what became of the feared but most prized consortium of merchants; the East India Company.

Back to trading basics

Returning to my history of how coinage symbolises control of the masses, the Romans failed to influence the lowly Brit. Their stinking peasants’ coins did not change the mindset of the masses and these quickly became obsolete in favour of barter. Territories that unified to become Germany in 1870 were partially a Roman success, though. Mass populations of influential States were broken from the 8^th century onwards under the yoke of copper money. Historically, the Brits have always refused to become an annex of Europe, so attitude outcomes are hardly a surprise. Nevertheless, post decimalisation woes have paved the way for all sorts of horrors, such as membership of the Common Market, European Union and introducing the dreaded Euro alongside coin of the realm. It is sadly looking as though the great British bulldog has been crossbred with the poodle.

When William Conqueror attempted to impose the will of the elites on the English people, he achieved next to nothing (other than commissioning construction of those towering cathedrals designed to swamp faith). Feudalism could only be engineered with silver; coinage of the aristocracy (thinking classes). Craftsmen and serf alike insisted on pay. In fact, unsurprisingly, the introduction of copper coinage only returned with Charles II’s milled coins for Britain and Ireland from 1660. The rightful king had been invited back to lead an unconstitutional British monarchy after the elites’ hallowed republic dismally failed. Nepotism had dealt a final indignant blow to their enchanted “Commonwealth” (or Protectorate) run by Oliver Cromwell. He had bestowed greater powers on his son than deposed king Charles I had wielded. Charles, of course, had been murdered to usher in a new age of light (which, I must say, equated to excruciating darkness for the masses) clearly of the “deepest black” variety.

Globalised banking (heralding modern day standardisation) reputedly began with an agreement established by Lloyd’s Agencies at a London coffee (brought in by the New World) house in 1694, although a little more detail on the politics of the time might make things clearer. The plan had always been to unite the British Isles under the “Union of Jacob”. However, both Scotland and Ireland had shown to be uncontrollably troublesome. From the Middle Ages conquest against the Scots was common with memorable battles such as Bannockburn of the second war over independence. The way England and Scotland were eventually permanently joined was via shared kingship. Elizabeth I left no legitimate heir so this allowed James VI of Scotland to become James I of England. Perhaps Mary, Queen of Scots, was executed in vain?

He began costly wars against Ireland with some earnest. James’ son, the deposed Charles I, did less, possibly because affairs of state were abruptly interrupted with the civil war of 1642, but unrest in Scotland and Ireland (viewed as a “protectorate”) from 1639 onwards is colloquially known as the Bishops’ Wars. The hapless king was famously executed in 1649 after losing the civil war and his son was forced into exile. However, in 1651 the Scots crowned Charles II king. With it came an attempt at reinstating Charles with the English throne too. However, this was foiled by roundhead generals in control. Britain, theoretically, was subject to Martial Law from 1649 until Cromwell was sworn in as Protector December 1653. The point I am trying to make is that the 1600’s was a period of enormous upheaval and political turbulence, so it is no wonder the bankers felt confident enough to conspire in 1694.  It is inconceivable that they weren’t linked in some way with the consortiums of merchants that had rebelled against royal authority.

Flemish influence, the Bill of Rights and more tyranny

Two years later William of Orange would be in control of Britain through marriage with Mary Stuart. Mary was the daughter of James II (son of Charles II) who had been deposed and exiled by nobles (merchant bankers) for exerting too much royal power. Notably, King William introduced the Bill of Rights for British aristocrats (which to some degree addressed the failings of the Cromwell republics) along with the Dutch mortgage systems. If the royals were now hypothetically bankrupt, it wouldn’t take too long for the aristocracy to follow with the helping bankers’ hands. 1696 was the year currency was first pinned to the gold standard (a weights & measures system invented by Sir Isaac Newton). Contextually this is very important as, when England’s gold currency collapsed in 1797 (roughly a century after the gold standard was introduced) due to over speculation in the colonies, a short lived silver standard returned using royal stamped Spanish doubloons. It is breathtaking to consider the fact it took merchant bankers a mere century to break currency.

Globalists regularly cite the various Bills of Rights and Constitutions as tenets of democracy. Yet, the reality is that the philology behind Law making has skewed just about all goodwill from the outset. Rhetoric framing “rights” is always far too broad to scope models that work – in the universal sense. Indeed it could be said that the supposed frameworks of democracy are the very instruments of manipulation that evoke tyranny by the backdoor. Thus, special “minority” lobbies (such as AIPAC – a critical favourite of Mantiq-Al-Tayr, but there is always some special love for “hero” Jonathan Pollard too) ensure the masses are perennially subject to their wishes or, perhaps, “subjugated” might be a more apt expression. Great Britain, for instance, has no constitution and relies on a centuries old corporate charter that legitimised royal plunder of free lands. This devils’ contract is called the Magna Carta.

Per its 14^th Amendment, the American constitution was similarly reduced to a corporate charter in 1868. Limits were possibly first tested by the District of Colombia’s “organic” Act 1871 (February 21) which set “Washington” (where all laws are made) adrift from the rest of America. The prior civil war (1861-65) had been a watered down version of the centuries’ earlier English one. In this case, though, the contest was between principles defining a constitutional republic and an unconstitutional commercial contract (the friendly way of saying dictatorship). From 1868 America became holus bolus property of the industrialists and is still their dictatorship. The implementation of the Federal Reserve 1913/14 was a system that expanded the “cause” to the rest of the globe. World War One was a celebration of multi-lateral control of the masses.

Gold, silver and bronze reduced to paper

Worthless copper/bronze became the universal peasants’ coinage from the 1600’s.  Coin of the realm should be taken very seriously. In my formative years, I was lucky to live in a Jacobean farmhouse. Ceilings were lined with 1850’s and 60’s newspaper sheets. Rescuing a few, I found them enthralling reading. These really were harsh times, with burgeoning inquisitions and no rescue for offenders. One young London lass had been sentenced to hang for whitewashing a farthing (one quarter penny) in an attempt to pass it off as a tanner (six pence) to a land owner. She had dared convert something worthless into a thing of value, but, most importantly, she had gone beyond her station. A popular phrase amongst the philanthropic gentry of time was “know your place” (implying their tyranny demonstrated Godly virtue). Mid 1800’s saw an industrialists’ heyday and enormous conflicts with guilds supporting craft industries. Therefore, it is important that the masses never forsake the sacrifices their forefathers made to improve the lot of those destined to have no future.

Be this as it may, prior to 1918 royal stamped coinage did correctly observe weights and measures (and then incorrectly up to 1945-48). I think I also need to add, at this juncture, Newton’s gold standard discussed earlier was more of a formalisation of something that went back to the dawn of creation of money, perhaps pre Atlantis times. As a precaution against fraud, it is difficult to ascertain whether crooks that clipped coins from medieval times onwards were successful in their enterprise or defaced coins were commonly rejected on sight forcing some sort of common law arrests. Theoretically, at least, any attack on the coin of the realm was a form of treason. For drastic evidence, I might select the case of a Mauritian head postmaster who was jailed with his wife in the 1850’s for using her facial profile in place of Queen Victoria’s on postage stamps. Mind you, the evidence in question was so crudely produced, I cannot fathom how anyone could tell the difference as none of the correct portrayals even vaguely resembled the queen. The point being is it was the thought of it that irked the system and that was enough to vilify outrage. Everything Queen Victoria endorsed was associated with commerce of privilege.  That giant marketing organ could not afford to see the royals’ status tarnished in any way.

Right up to Word War One currency determined values backed by metals of worth. Whether the denominations were Chinese taels, French francs, Portuguese reals or common old United States of America dollars, all were representative of precious portions determined by mass. A British gold sovereign did not vary. Nor did the guinea piece. They were what they were. Aside from the strange and untrue Washington Post announcement that 6 million Jews had been killed as a consequence of the world war, in 1919 something tragic happened. The monumental domino effect from the collapse of Germany has largely been overlooked by popular history, but if there were charges to be levelled at a New World conspiracy to usurp order, Woodrow Wilson’s draconian and unnecessary measures supplanted after the Treaty of Versailles as reparations against the fallen nation was evidence enough. Is that what is meant by New World Order?

Many level imprudent charges against the Federal Reserve for skimming 3% off the top of the US Exchequer. In fact, as far as I can ascertain, the bankers bear all costs associated with design, printing, distribution and stock security, so 3% (as a simple charge) seems more than fair to me. The real issue is, as usual, camouflaged by ignorance. When the cartel of bankers most foul was established, courtesy (in part) of Woodrow Wilson 1913/14, the corporate exchequer had been outsourced to money launderers. Wagon loads of German gold via France came into the United States under the approving eye of that imposing French Statue of Liberty. No wonder the 1920’s were roaring. It gave the banking industry in general, the confidence to speculate like it had never done before. Hire purchase was the active response, providing ample opportunity to bankrupt the masses.

Germany was probably bust in 1919 but it took only two years for all the gold prised from the people to impact the Deutsche mark. Ultimately, there was no gold to back paper currency (papiermark had replaced goldmark in 1914 courtesy of the Federal Reserve) so the inevitable happened. Hyperinflation kicked in to eventually break the Deutsche mark. In 1924 a new Reich mark was issued, but those with gold converted savings over the inflation period were ruined without hope of compensation courtesy of the prior reparations scam that had clearly been egged on by Federal Reserve bankers as they were the ones that gained so much from German misery. Since 1920, when the Federal Reserve bankers had the gall to staunchly defend the gold standard (so targeted nations would collapse without their intervention), dozens of currencies have been forced to intermittently drop off it (with “certification” from the Federal Reserve, of course). Nevertheless, Germany is probably the best example of that objective tyranny, though. Even the British pound was not spared. The 1920’s and 1930’s saw markets intermittently trading worthless banknotes. Arguments inferring that paper money was more flexible and easier to carry are flawed. The real reason paper was used is in deference to the gold standard. Earliest banknotes were no different to today’s cheques.

Jiggery pokery post German reparations lionized US-Jewish supremacy launching “commie bastard” Hitler

Though, officially, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took America off the gold standard 5^th June 1933, signs of unaccountability were clearly there in 1932 and perhaps, even, 1931. Casualties this time were First World War veterans who had had their pensions’ squandered, courtesy of “the boom” and consequential “depression”. A 1932 veterans “tent city” Washington protest march was met with callous insensitivity by the government who ended up sending in the National Guard led by gallant MacArthur; an altercation infamously remembered as the “Bonus Army” War.  The US bust leading to these unfortunate circumstances had been engineered, once again, by those hallowed Federal Reserve money launderers. Sneakily, in the late 1920’s they had syphoned huge gold deposits from America (accountably $840 million) back to Germany in preparation for a newly energised campaign launching Chancellor Hitler, January 1933.

Barely a month after Roosevelt admonished the gold standard; Hitler had signed the Haavara agreement (25^th August) with (though better known today) a mysterious order called Zionists. It was after agreed Jewish repatriation (or home moving as Haavara would suggest) to Palestine that anti-Semitism myths began to appear with unrequited vigour. Prior veiled allegations were the Zionists’ spineless way of making threats. In fact, Hitler was a mere pawn in their grand game. Once they had repatriation in place, they only needed to encourage Jews that had no intention of leaving their homeland, Germany wasn’t safe. In other words “Diasporas” that would not leave were to be pushed out. The ones that hung on to the bitter end were rewarded with maltreatment or death in concentration camps.

Very little has been written about Hitler’s Marxist-Socialist ambitions. Not only did he nationalise major German corporations, but he also stole great tranches of land from the German aristocracy (including some Jews). The Goyim, however, were not given blessed Jewish passage. Many years ago, my old work colleagues’ father informed me that after land seizure, the Von Grundherr family had emigrated from Germany to Britain with anything and everything they could carry. Their vast Bavarian estates were gone forever. See how the totalitarians omit history to craft false impressions? In fact Goebbels’ “brownshirts” were scathingly labelled Brown Bolsheviks by propagandists after World War Two and undeniably leftist, Hitler, is noted for his admiration of Stalin prior to the breakdown of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939).

1914 saw the rapid reintroduction of passport control in the European region, so clearly and demonstrably “people management” was calculated well in advance of the precursor to the modern enslavement of humanity. Few have taken the time to learn that the passport system was abolished in France in 1861 due to a massive influx of tourists that overwhelmed immigration to such a degree it could not cope. Overall, though, the net tightened on global border security from 1947, which is odd, considering the Jew’s lament so about how Hitler used their identification papers against them. Only one year later reformed Israel became reality and the Bretton Woods System effectively universally forfeited the gold standard (only to be introduced as United States policy by Nixon in 1971, which ties in with the unspoken “5 Year Plan” that saw formulation of the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and the end of the Vietnam war in 1975). Other than a brief hiccup in Australia, with the introduction of sterling silver 50 cent coins (rounds) in 1966, global coinage reverted to copper/nickel amalgams. Gold and silver was absent never to return?

He who controls the gold wins: return to Israel by ass

Forget the Jewish proverb, “he that has the gold wins” as it is the controllers of the gold that are always in the box seat. Control of gold was used to create the two great wars and the Russian “revolution” (or, to be pertinent, Zionist coup-d’état). Mainstream history would never report real popular revolutions because that would distort totalitarian branding objectives. All “uprisings” are elite sponsored successes, invariably with outcomes recorded in a less than historically perfect way. As Napoleon once said, “History is a set of lies agreed upon and written by the winners”. Fortunately there have been enough unfunded and ostracised true historians to provide adequate fleeting glimpses of legitimate information to break the mould for those with persistence of learning. Agreed, intense investigation is more time consuming, requires greater diligence and discernment, but also makes the discovery tour a blissful treasure rewarding journey. I swear by it!

It was after 1975 that the new concept, futures & options, blossomed to take markets by storm, elevating consumerism to unthinkably heady heights. To which end, the United States of America is now theoretically in debt to the tune of over $200 trillion. Whom this debt is payable to is a question everyone should demand answered, for, according to my calculations, every single “nation” on Earth is more or less in the same boat as the USA. If “balance of deficits” is not some sick joke, this is a sham of most devastating proportions; a sham that affects every human being belonging to a system that isn’t in power. We now have the situation where tax payers’ money is worthless and nations that issue it don’t have any actual capital to back promises even if they wanted to. Pledges supposedly in support of the people invariably aren’t. In fact, genuine ones are so infrequent; it must be said, in some ways policy makers give the industrialists’ enslavement of the masses agenda relative transparency.

The reason Nixon backed off the gold standard was simple. Capitalism had won by 1971 as that marked the year the merchant bankers owned the world. There is a path out of the mess that is being gently crafted by BRICS nations (acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), but I smell a double cross as far as the people are concerned. Real revolt is the only way to turn the industrialists’ clock back. Revolt can be peaceful, violent or a combination, but it must be put into motion for real change. Descendants should be ever vigilant for lasting remedies. For an example of genuine reactionary politics in favour of the people, one only needs to inspect shenanigans in Italy. Forget the Iceland nonsense. Italy is an unrivalled corporate nation in so much as the people haven’t completely lost their way and become detached from the political negotiation table. Other populations need to arbitrate Latin style and liberty might just reclaim some territory.

Free thoughts about corporate Catholicism, Zionism, P G Wodehouse and George Orwell’s “totalitarian Israel” pun

There are so many other things I wanted to talk about in conjunction with this, but, as I have already exceeded 6,000 words, it is going to take more than one sitting to do justice to the subject matter. Future articles will expand on the baseline “Totalitarian Brands”, as mentioned in the introduction. Building credentials of “yes men” to drive fake science is one item to be covered at length, though I do give hints in an earlier entry (Is Science Illusionary). Perhaps hilarious P G Wodehouse’s character, Sir Roderick Glossop, will be selected to emphasise how much philosophy in deference to data helps to validate quack science opinion. For the ill-informed, Glossop runs an experimental psychiatry clinic with founding principles intimating that by allowing sheer immoderation of consumption is enough to break any habit or addiction. Early in the narrative line our fearless sanatorium owner is quick to admit none of his patients had ever shown any cessation of immoderation, but, neither had they relapsed [from this “extremely popular” treatment]. By that token, his system was “theoretically impeccable”.

The difference between consultants and slaves also deserves detailed separate discussion. Rogue branding campaigns, particularly the ones that appear misunderstood or perhaps even championed by confused free thinkers, will be tackled tactfully. In recent times, much emphasis has been placed on so-called chemtrails as the root of all modern sickness. This simply is not true as, more seriously, they are being used as a smokescreen to cover blatantly obvious petrochemical pollution; pollution I might add that likely causes all cancers, many viruses and other nagging health concerns. The anti-renaissance flat Earth movement has returned, welcomed by the Catholic Church no doubt. Though in many ways Catholicism is the balance of power against Zionism, it issues its own version of rabid propaganda which, in that capacity, can deeply impede those paths to enlightenment for unstable truth seekers that teeter on the brink of bewilderment. These hapless, well-meaning souls are regularly lured into a kind of corrupt solace from the power of “faction groups”.

Pretty much from 1948 the globe was treated as a fortress with stringent passport control implemented where infrastructures existed, the Bretton-Woods scheme replaced gold, deregulating paper currency (assuring all foreign exchange traded through the non-existent greenback standard) in the same year and silver was mysteriously removed from coins (as a global control measure). There surely must be much more to the conspiracy involving the reformation of Israel also in 1948. Why are there such extraordinarily high percentages of Jewish bank directors, political stakeholders and mass media owners today? In my notes pre-empting this project, I lightly scribbled “Federal Reserve New Age con”. For the life of me, I cannot remember what I meant by that unless I was referring to the role the United Nations plays in loosely scoping concepts found in Aldous Huxley’s “A Brave New World”. That said I’m sure it was important, so when I remember I’ll certainly cover it too.

Wrapping up with me, Martin Luther, Napoleon Bonaparte and Mantiq-Al-Tayr

Before I sign off, I promised an introduction to the fine work and vigilance of Mantiq-Al-Tayr. Though his articles unashamedly favour the Arabian cosmopolitan view on life, the world and everything, he also patriotically champions America in the honourable sense of that word. Thus, many criticisms would be of universal appeal to those seeking more honest perspectives on life, the world and everything. Not just because he perceives his deadliest enemies as agents of Zionism, but there is also comedy, passionate language and even the occasional vagrant belly dancer to tantalise prying eyes. To be brutally frank, unless you are in the Jewish club, everyone’s most deadly enemies are agents of Zionism even if they (Zionists incognito) call themselves something else. Reformist Jesuit (had the spirit of Catholicism become so decayed by 1517 it had ceased to be viable?), Martin Luther, had much to say about the Jews.

“Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weissensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.” (One of Martin Luther’s pleasanter quotes against Zionism, circa 1500’s)

Napoleon Bonaparte’s wisdom “You don’t reason with intellectuals. You shoot them” may seem rather inexcusable. Nevertheless, the science-atheist-Zionist allegiance is not to be reasoned with because desired truths can be reconstructed from any approximate fantasy simply through misdirection, perhaps in the way lawyers deliberately misinterpret contracts. Let us say someone symbolised a conductor’s reasonable request for passengers to alight from a train as the catastrophic command; leave the train on fire. That would parry with some misdirection stunts pulled over the years in the interests of zeal. This particular blog never will be a Jew bashing forum. I recommend investigation into the Israelite prodigal musician Daniel Barenboim’s eloquent efforts championing the Palestinians’ plight. There are many other erstwhile unknown Jewish heroes of virtue for those committed to digging deep.

Mantiq-Al-Tayr goes out of his way to highlight psy-op misdirection, but he also observes more mundane “in your face” system abuses that seem to go unchecked by authorities. For instance he will not let the world forget Israel’s heinous and unpunished attack on sovereign America June 8^th, 1967. This unforgettable event was, of course, the foul and merciless torpedoing of USS Liberty. I won’t add to Mantiq’s thunder other than remarking he has ripped the veil covering the Whitehouse asunder. Please visit his website and pass on your thoughts. You might also wish to review posting archives which stretch back the best part of a decade or, perhaps, prior. He presents the brand Zion “God” so well. Diligent researchers will find it most interesting and disheartening at the same time that there has been virtually no change in Whitehouse administrative attitudes from bonehead Bush to that current black Messiah.

We have covered belligerent order first delivered by renegade priest-kings and then atheist commerce tsars, introduction of money where none had been present, currency regulation via arbitrary standards and covert controlled fiscal deregulation. There are a couple of other pieces of the puzzle needed to complete this sorry picture. Abolishment of slavery in England, 1807, did nothing to improve the lot for Irish immigrants now forced to work as “servants” for a pittance. Timing was calculated for the burgeoning industrial revolution. Improvements in manufacturing technologies had begun to impact the crafts’ industry back in the 18^th century. Purists might question the “point” of more than one currency unit fulfilling the needs of a federalised Earth. The pertinence of multiple currencies, as far as the industrialists are concerned, was shown from cotton stock record profits made directly after slavery ending in the United States. In the spirit of déjà vu, 1865 saw the Negroes offered the same raw deal the Irish received before. It was all about stock values, excise tax and insurance. I will leave you switched on researchers to join the dots for now.

Thus, the reason he who controls the gold wins, is it is how markets are driven that directs how populations will react [to synthetic conditions]. So if you want refugees, war and chaos, as an industrialist master, you merely need to influence markets with your gold because, though standards have been abolished, baseline value has always been inevitably measured against that filthy precious commodity. Right to export and price of imports can make or break nations. Particularly since 1971 another reckless asset has made and broken fortunes. Remembering that chemtrail smokescreen, oil is sometimes called black gold and has worked with its yellow metal partner in a pincer movement to ensnare markets of modern times. Petrodollars (invented in 1973) hidden in sovereign wealth funds (laundered by investment banks) has camouflaged incomprehensible universal funding by Saudi Arabia in particular. Super-rich Saudis are colloquially known as Wahhabis (die hard Zionists, surprise, surprise) by the way. Included in their fold are such personable families as the Bin Ladens. To coin the popular phrase, “has the penny dropped, yet?”