Malicious Compliments

I promised a commenter I would reveal the solution to end humanity’s suffering, but I am neither willing nor prepared to disclose that yet. This is partially because my last couple of posts have been pretty hard on the viewer; though for good reason. Just before Christmas I highlighted some of my personal problems. Clarification did not include background information that I share a house with a rabble of Iranian terrorists. They must be terrorists because they are from Iran. Australia classifies them as refugees, but look at the Martin Place incident. We all know.


The Iranians have a word that is similar in character to the Thai “tolle”. Sincere affectionate usage amongst friends and family is perfectly reasonable and common. To confront strangers with “Koskesh!” has been known to prompt clashes to the death; the insult is considered that pungent. They told me, “Sticks and stones will break your bones, but words will never hurt me.” How insincere. How untrue. How unreflective of the nature of man.

Continuing on from the human condition…

I had intended to title this post, “Sincere Hypocrisy” but at the eleventh hour I made the title change. Shakespeare (nee Dee or Bacon, depending how you argue it) regularly used the oxymoron to great effect which gives his writings a bitter sweetness. Malicious compliments not only turned out as the best paired contradiction for the message I intend to convey but also summarises it.

Regular readers now know I confront, but confrontation had been mostly limited to other people until recently, you know, “them”. For the last few posts the finger has been very much turned back on the reader – “you”. It is no longer enough to glide by as a delicate butterfly between pollinating flowers. The finger is not just asking for effervescent appreciation – like minds, twin souls and all that jibber jabber. It is asking for capitulation. Butterflies don’t capitulate; they glide.

Humans are not lapidoptera. Some, however, may know of an anecdotal use of the word for butterfly in Thailand. This is generally given to habitual adulterers. A character trait of the debaucher is the posturing of malicious compliments. So adept are the experts, their craft is almost an art form. Because I have high expectations of my audience and I would like to believe some of you are thinking people, being a hard task master is but the singular preoccupation. Other blogs will attract and court feeble minded vanity. Feeble minded ones go and look churlishly at bunnies or puppies. Cease clogging my energy field.

Doing over saying

The most confronting aspect of my last few posts has been my request for action. Broadly speaking, the call has found idle spirits and wanton souls, but this has helped to highlight the real problem – we are not getting real. When I was three I learned the numbers and could count to one hundred. For at least a year I incessantly repeated my newly acquired knowledge, often at the top of my voice. The reason I did this was because it was easy and I sought compliments.

“How old are you?”

“I am three”

“You can count to ten. What a good boy”

There is another layer which does not become obvious until maturity kicks in. Reach a certain age and the value of fame and fortune becomes all too clear. The best way to permeate fame and fortune is not by being it, but, rather, by attaching to a successful energy field. How many friends of Obama are there that have ridden his energy flow only to turn coat as soon as the tide turned? Others chose denial and vigorously defend his treacherous arrogance against the American people regardless of sane objections. They, both types, consolidate the parasitic nature of man.

“Oh yes, I am a personal friend of Jon Rappoport. I visit his blog and regularly contribute to his cause”

If Jon was a “nobody” like me we wouldn’t see you for dust. It would be fair to say that Jon has an international reputation. This comes at a price. The vast majority of his “friends” feed off his energy field. I would be the first to admit Jon’s blog has been a useful vehicle for me, but I commented long before I made an overt web presence introduction and the reason I subscribed to his blog is I thought and think he has an outstanding mind – a mind of transcendental qualities.

It was largely thanks to Jon that I decided my own original message was merit worthy. His celebration of individual imagination has inspired mine. I am not the only one. There are others that have made the sacrifice, put integrity and belief on the line, made spare (sic) time and created independent, refreshing views.

Why should they do that for you to do nothing?

Remember the unspeakable Iranian word, Koskesh, I mentioned earlier? A couple of posts back I explained I was about to become homeless and appealed to a dignified readership to do something. The appeal was met with abject silence, inaction, muted fecklessness. Two tireless bloggers that work round the clock, sorry, in their “spare time”, made small but Godly donations. To the rest of you I say Koskesh. You are all lower than the dirt under my boot. A call for action, a real crisis (which I might add is far from over) was met with void – a festering blank where something should have been.

What about Ebola?

Void, inaction, nothing, conjecture

What about GMO?

Oh that’s okay, they might label everything. We’ll have a protest? Somebody will protest. It will all work itself out.

Lessons for kindergarteners

Remember how I repeatedly counted up to ten to court compliments? Well, those compliments turned malicious after the ninetieth set. Look at what you are doing. Ebola, GMO, politics, doesn’t matter. You repeat the same incessant messages over and over. Either the compliments turn malicious or arguments die. Are there any solutions? Is there any actual action? Does anyone do anything?


No, no, NO

No, no, NO

Oh yes, I read all those spineless comments about how “you” are “Ok Jack”. I read the boasts from those that have perfectly positioned land holdings. I hear those that brag about their drug free constitutions. I feel the suffering of those that have been marginalised, left behind because of your arrogant refusal to share. Sharing isn’t parroting incessant affirming chimes – old lame, dead words. Sharing is giving stuff. Sharing is doing stuff. Sharing is making a personal sacrifice for strangers.

Malicious compliments belie pathological arrogance

I wrote a book recently. It is the first in a series of ten books. Very short, being only forty nine pages and under twenty thousand words, it is a monstrous read. Transposing cyclic inherent knowledge (truth) into a linear format is a nigh on impossible task. Decoding the holistic mechanical purpose of existence should have assured universal interest. It affects everyone.

The initial target of one thousand book sales was reduced to one hundred after the underwhelming climax. Now sales reaching double figures would be deemed miraculous. In some ways it is no surprise, for the best part of my readership is pathologically arrogant. If someone produces something new, it is beyond criticism but places a big challenge to the reality bubble. Arrogance is merely a poor cousin of scepticism. Therefore arrogant people are sceptics. As the sceptic refuses to “un-know” anything, he or she seeks information that exclusively either affirms or conforms to existing belief systems. Sacrilege is their way of progress.

As I may become famous, occasional readers have hedged their bets offering malicious compliments to keep their position as “friend of Ozzie Thinker” hot – just in case I, too, become as successful as Jon Rappoport, for instance. My book series is not some dead horse, some glue worthy nag. It punctures the heart of the human condition and diligent readers will see why governments manipulate parasitic people that elevate the “successful” energy fields. In the spirit of cooperation with the idiom, I give vain would be donators the opportunity to create an heirloom. If the donation’s big enough, I can cast it in stone; or gold, if necessary.

A number’s game is base 60

I occasionally present analogic reasoning using cam girls and their followers. Readers must not take writings literally as there is invariably a thematic vignette exposing an inset moral piquancy. The camouflaged message of the last one disguises roughly one in sixty would be committed advocates act, which, in the case of cam girls, equates to approximately the same ratio of cashed up followers that actually tip. The hordes eagerly wait in anticipation of free titillation.

I don’t know whether there is some sort of hereditary karmic rebirth syndrome perspiring medieval self-flagellation, but the more directly my posts attempt to unmask my readership’s gaping faults, the greater the interest in them. Visitation figures are going up; steadily. That means there must be some hope for my book. Statistically (and factoring in all those malicious compliment givers) one in sixty (of those that buy books) means a book sale.

Oh just one brave purchaser will see a turnaround in my attitude. Even if you don’t like books, I don’t have spare time, so you may wish to contribute to say thank you for the time and effort I put in. “Thank you for flagellating me because I haven’t the way with all to do it to myself”.

Once again I will give my readership the opportunity to be nice

The first of my book series is available for a donation of not less than $10US (Australian readers can visit and donate A$12 or more). For clarity, this is not a “fixed price” and there is no ceiling to donation amounts, which should be $10 or greater. Contributions keep the writing project afloat. [Important: I do not believe you need a Paypal account these days as major credit/bedit cards are accepted]

PayPal Donate Button

Book purchase

Information is not the result of replication and possibly unique. The package small (below 20,000 words), but is not a diamond? Is a diamond merely “quartz” or something intrinsically perfect? Donators should e-mail with the simple instruction “Donated for DDD Intro” after payment has been made. An individually inscribed and numbered copy is available for more generous donators determined to ensure my work succeeds (amounts not less than $800). Orders will be despatched in PDF form as expediently as humanly possible.


The Human Condition


The finger is pointing at YOU!

The finger is pointing at YOU!

Today should be a very special day for me but instead it is a day of realisation. Sure I have had lots of affirmations of goodwill, “Have a happy day, mate”, but no support. Therefore the reality is my special day has been a miserable one. The only saving grace is it will eventually end and I can move on to a normal day; the same as any other with its diminished expectations. People like to blame but do not like the finger pointed back on them and I feel sure that prior posts have exposed the human condition so effectively, will you all boycott this blog? I compare humans to cockroaches in my notes for “A Brief History of Human Conscience” because at the slightest sign of real hardship, you all run for cover. That is the human condition.

There is an extra-terrestrial connection to this website. Observant readers will be aware of the link above. Exopolitician has been conceived as an alternative source to the so-called Disclosure Movement. Whereas there are many paragons I respect associated with this cause, information is clearly being sanitised to fit into a workable variation of erstwhile propaganda. Back in the ages gone by, there was opportunity abound for those with money, or charisma. Pioneering intellectual curiosity invariably joined waves of explorers in search of new lands and new hope. Charles Darwin’s father was a 33rd degree freemason who funded the Beagle. Arguably the greater contributor to the infamous Origins of Species was Alfred Russel Wallace. Because he could not be persuaded that the Illuminati reptilian “survival of the fittest” had been conclusively “proved”, he has been surreptitiously ignored by popular publicists. That is the human condition.

Recently I released my own short but revolutionary volume as the introduction to my tome, “Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons”. It is a unique and inspired creation that breaks the mould and gives an alternative to the established view. By re-encoding existence, the truth becomes clear at all levels. As a prequel, I tested the inclination of my readership to act in prior posts and was rewarded with idleness. Charity is the great test for humanity, so that was my vehicle. My stance was simple – give because you can give. This was a grand test to demonstrate either action was obsolete or humanity could adapt. Logically, the next phase of the test was to place deed into a commercial setting. I tried to convert all those past phantom offers of support and found, but for two solitary fellow bloggers (and a few Australian fans that have seen me speak publically), words did not commute to deed. There was only inaction. That is the human condition.

I regularly visit, sometimes contributing comments to, fellow bloggers and writers. Much rational sentiment and judicious thinking personifies aggressive campaigns against the status quo: Ebola, toxic vaccines, GMO’s, wilful destruction of the environment, satanic government, genocide against wild horses. All of it is hot air because it is greeted with inaction. Positive affirmations versus the tendency to blame make up the human condition. Bloggers talk and talk and talk. Commenters respond by talking more. A vacuum of inaction is shrouded by likeminded attestations. Affirmations must point in the right direction – If its north, woe to those that defy the madding rabble by heading west. But it is so for this is the human condition.

Government and "the people"

Government and “the people”

The reality is much starker. Diligent readers would do wise to understand home truths. Anyone that votes is a slave or a slave master. Slaves are the property of the government. Slave masters control government. If you are not a slave master, why do you vote? Those that don’t vote are not free. These are displaced peoples that belong nowhere, for all land was conquered by government years ago. That is the human condition. You talk and talk and talk and when that doesn’t work, you protest. What do you protest? How do you protest? You try and give visibility to your qualms but only kindly inform fellow slaves of their duty whilst empowering the slave masters. The only way to affect (not effect) change is by acting. That most certainly is not the human condition.

Action does not need to be militant, but it must be disruptive. The reason all slaves work is the slave masters desire it. When slaves, en-masse, cease to work, slave masters have a big problem. Their house of cards collapses in a heap. Italy has shown the power of not working. General strikes are most effective tools against corporate criminality. Governments are super-corporations that divide the pie. Don’t lay down your lives on the battle field. Do it on the picket line. Results will be far quicker and lasting. But this requires pain, suffering and perhaps even death. That most certainly is not the human condition.

My book has some new and unknown information for everyone. Everyone could learn something. It is not reprocessed information; yet another rehashed “view”. It is a unique perspective taken from inherence (unfettered “cyclic” truth). Though cyclic information is hard to convert into linear systems, I did find a compromise which took almost one year to define. What has been my reward? With two exceptions, I have had zero support from a readership that spurns truth, is committed to ignorance and arrogantly affirms the madding rabble – wherever they direct. Most importantly action has been reduced to wilful fantasy for you talk and talk and talk, as is the human condition.

No more offers of support, please! Details on book purchase can be found here.

Introduction to Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons

It has been long awaited, but after considerable effort, I have suitably tuned materials devoted to the first part of Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons. The perfectionist in me wanted a poetic flow that would harmonise lowly and great as one common mind. Occasional jarring expressive form rudely discords. Outbursts have been minimised to such a degree, I view the finished article as a work of art. Hopefully, it will have the same effect on conscientious readers. This all comes at a price. To me – the best part of a year of my life; to you, a donation of not less than $10US (Australian readers can visit and donate A$12 or more). For clarity, this is not a “fixed price” and there is no ceiling to donation amounts, which should be $10 or greater. Contributions keep the writing project afloat.

PayPal Donate Button

Book purchase


Information is not the result of replication and possibly unique. The package small (below 20,000 words), but is not a diamond? Is a diamond merely “quartz” or something intrinsically perfect? Donators should e-mail with the simple instruction “Donated for DDD Intro” after payment has been made. An individually inscribed and numbered copy is available for more generous donators determined to ensure my work succeeds (amounts not less than $800). Orders will be despatched in PDF form as expediently as humanly possible.

In case some are still not clear on my style, here is the Preface (included with book) to whet the appetite:


My journey through turbulent seas to reach the point I call now has afforded ample opportunity for witness. The significant culmination marked by the point I call now has unveiled the result of a project being the work of several months backed by decades, if not a lifetime of experience. Other writers do exist. I have witnessed them, studied their results, and revelled in their creativity. They too, often have made extraordinary sacrifices in the belief they have something to say important enough to encourage mass readership. The significant difference between them and me is substance. They choose, invariably, to strictly align to past traditions as a way of justifying sentiment. I do not. Mine is a celebration of originality so any reference to past thinking is surely superfluous. How can originality have references? Thus, though this is a literary work, some readers may be confused into the assumption that much of the rhetoric ‘must be” symbolic or, perhaps, “metaphoric”. I assure those misguided voices that science illusion has such a firm hold on the etiquette of creativity any “contradictions to the fact” are deemed fantastic.

These volumes are not fantasies but will surely confuse avid politically correct philologists. In light of this, some of the subject matter may be reasoned as forms of science fiction, such as “Harry Potter” or, even, one of those strategy game quests. God help me if this is so. I make no attempt, nor will, at trying to appease time honoured traditions that have strangled all hope of true learning at colleges and universities. This is something new, fresh and different. Under these conditions, I make no apology for my findings, present no bibliography and acknowledge only what I believe. The ones that say their beliefs are knowledge deceive. My objective, as a living and breathing entity, is to turn un-knowledge into knowledge. Belief is but the first step towards conversion. Conscientious readers will notice occasional information sources. These are not to prove I am credible but, rather, to allow furtherance of the discovery tour. No attempt has been made to cover my path and I avidly try to pass on the keys for this job is too much for one humble spirit. Every single inference has been double and treble checked. I am my biggest task master, not taking the truth lightly. Lack of vision, misinterpretation and shallow evidence are the great adversaries of truth. My absolute dedication has been to assure senses are fully alert to limit and hopefully avoid anomalies. Reason connotes some critics; ultimately, will find gold for their causes. If that is so, my future mission will surely demonstrate theirs is fool’s gold.

There is certainly a message that begs transmission, but where do I start? You see opinions are so entrenched that the truth has been theorised out of existence. Even intelligent, vibrant human entities have become corrupt beyond redemption, because to champion the truth is to detach from the hive. The message is very straightforward but it will contradict any semblance of conscious reasoning. This is not a knee jerk apologist reaction. It is a frank appraisal of the apathetic tyranny of applied insanity which is given as reality by forces that hallow dulled senses and mindless obedience. The enslavement of humanity began with the commitment to normalcy. What they, the deceivers, categorise as normal changes over the ages, but all support mundane agendas destined to control and the truth be damned.

Beginning at the beginning is always difficult as everything did not appear to start. Instead it has always been in motion. Time, for instance, will be revealed as constantly in the present. For those that subscribe to the intent of the falsehood Big Bang, there was still something prior and the truth is now exposed. The void of nothing is populated by the notion of ignorance, for nothing is everything as what we call something only ever exists in the moment. Once the moment passes it is gone, vapour. Transmuting into something the same or different, so continues the grand illusion until nothing is revealed. We, the subscribers to illusory, programed and normalised by our realities, are ignorant of what went on before Big Bang because if we considered it our sanity (as regimented by science) would be checked. Those that do not buy normal must, surely, be insane? Therefore, by magic, Big Bang just happened. How do the reductionist/materialists express it? Ah yes, “it just popped into existence”.

My writings attempt to decipher lost truths and I explain both what the Big Bang phenomenon was and what preceded the event. Revelations will be as logical as startling. However, I warn reductionist/materialist surveyors, nothing will conform to the Newtonian version of science as much of the evidence for reasoning is non-physical. On the rare occasions Newton and his empirical cultists are consulted, I invariably conclude and recommend their summary calculations are riddled with errors or, more often, flawed from conception. This is not from a lack of respect for Newton, indeed a great man, but from conclusive understand he too succumbed to normalcy of his time. With flawed basis his guide, output was always going to be clandestine. How can measurement of an illusion define reality?

Diligent readers should covet faith and let intellect breathe as the staple for comprehension. For the most part, I shall avoid building colourful stories around props, mimicking current science-exploitation. However, “role play” analogic situations do try and convey my truth for some of my conclusions would be hard to present in any other way. These findings are never fixed and diligent readers may experience mysterious contradictions. My writings are the symptom of a great journey and it would be unfair of me to censor messages I do not fully understand. Thus, everything is included and I make the best of explaining all the difficult bits. As new ideas and information materialise, so conclusions change. In-the-moment readers are only given a snapshot of now; however long now takes. Future writings, new releases and other projects will provide ample opportunity for greater clarity. Do not be surprised if the subtlety of the message changes over time.

My many criticisms of science are not directed at the potential of the medium, but rather at the mechanics as evidenced by the numerous abuses of those that attempt to ensnare ignorance in their vain cause to be right. Modern scientists have become something like junkies prepared to addle their fine minds for money and fame. The four points of influence are commerce, state, religion and pride. Diabolical illusions in the name of science conjure pointless “controls”, predetermined conclusions and fantasy analysis. This is, sadly and for the most part, the joint reign of modern science culture and science practice. Even without those diabolical influences, particularly in light of that empirics’ dead weight, conclusions would always be limited, at best, or flawed, at worst. If we consider space which is traditionally described as “mostly nothing” as, according to empirical science, everything is over 99% nothing, to transmute space general nothingness into a state of everything requires a paradigm shift of thinking. Along those lines, if I was to say that the nothingness of space was an illusion that exposes our ideological slavery and, if we were fully aware, everything-ness could and would become reality; no one even remotely attached to current science and its hive could or would be able to accept it. All attempts at transcendence would meet the same old dead ends and pit falls.

Reductionist materialism relies on nothingness as the core principle for its “everything”. It is time to present my first real challenge to conscientious readers. Can I say that reality, free from perception, is far stranger than everything-ness? Taking reality as illusory, I can confirm that this is clever thinking. However, if I said there was and is only a single point that has been duplicated near infinite times to create everything we know and don’t know; only the supremely courageous could willingly process that concept. Yet that is so and to make matters worse, the original and subsequent overlayed points are vents from nothing – “zero points” is the closest analogy. In other words everything emanates from and is a single [zero] point which, theoretically according to empirical science, doesn’t exist. In addition, in truth, the past, present and future are haphazardly fused together as random snippets and can only be constructively unravelled via the perception of linearity. There have been writings about a so-called “dimension ten” within which the materials of existence are jumbled up and in no particular order. Some emphasis is devoted to this phenomenon in the Introduction and First Part. Our reliance on the frequency we call dimension three (D3) assures we fail to notice its mechanics, which include the numerous scales that define our reality. We have not yet been able to scientifically separate lower dimensional frequencies. Properties of dimensions are explained in the Introduction and First Part. One of the scales specifically related to D3 is chronology. By way of a preview I can say that faced with innumerable preformed scenarios, individuals are bound to choose which “moves” are made. Thus, time and motion appear to go forward in the sense our chronometers indicate.

It is perceived spaces that allow objects to be; even though form only relates to rudimentary perception which is the result of activated cosmic code we call DNA defining/creating all the scales that enforce our reality. Chemical markers that guide researchers and guilds such as the Genome Project might be compared with ice crystals, for instance. In recent times study has been devoted to visual patterns created by sound vibrations. The patterns will never be sound. So it is with cosmic code and “DNA”. However, what isn’t there is as important as what is. In music professional performers learn without rests/spaces there would be no music. The spaces are more important than the notes, because they create form. That rule can be applied to cosmic creation. Our awareness is not just limited to, but is perception. This makes determining what is really real that much harder, for we need to break our cosmic code and step outside the programing to do so. Perception is not reality, but without it there is no reality and certainly no awareness of it. For the large part, and perhaps absolutely, expressive reality through perception universally conforms to the cosmic code and its chemical markers (measured by the Genome Project guild). However, our, human, bandwidth is extremely limited. Full understanding why is unfolded throughout Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons.

I can say, as a preliminary, this is not because “we” are limited, as we are complete, but cosmic code and its chemical markers determine what we are given access to; what it will reveal through our being. Our resonance is limited for some reason which I will try and decipher as one of the essential missions of this work. I will also attempt to expose what perpetuates the normalcy that embellishes the theories and supporting evidence shaping perception under the pretext of validation. My writings, through fault of expressive limits, on occasion will propose closed loops that paradoxically validate and dispute same findings. At times I will appear to support normalcy and others I branch from accepted science diktat. In doing so, conscientious readers would be well advised not to expect partisan control models of the type used by science to court ignorance.

Once again, many of the discussion points raised are nothing remotely “empirically” confirmable and logically perhaps fall into the category “theoretical physics/philosophy” and beyond. This is not to say revelations do not draw on inherence, are not rational as explanations or are beyond confirmation. Reality is explained by such different methods, that to build in science would be the same as trying to weigh happiness. Let us be frank, even popular science relies on hearsay when cataloguing definitions of singular emotion such as happiness or sadness. The scientist cannot avoid known emotions beyond typical craft rationale. He or she relies on empathy as much as predetermination (maybe they are the same?). Diligent readers would do best to approach this work as a big “who-done-it?” with the lead characters not only beyond or of this Earth but also, in part, defy proscribed logic. If nothing else is achieved, it will go some way towards breaking your programming. Get over that hurdle and you are ready to read Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons!