To Boycott is the Strongest “People Power”

Paul_hodgkin_I_want_changeOver the years I have read thousands of articles that, in various ways, place the responsibility for the ills of the people at the feet of government. Much noble sentiment has resonated with vocal followings. Mantras of dissent occasionally find a clearing in mainstream pockets only to be twisted out of proportion by jocular commentators. It should be no surprise, certainly to intellectuals, that the will of the people has never assumed responsibility for their occasional discordant outbursts. By that token, they have behaved in a very predictable, manageable way as far as governments are concerned.

Full Tyrannous Platter


If I said, “The moon is made of cheese”, people would automatically think I was being metaphorical (to cheese is to distort), joking or, perhaps, slightly mad. Assuming, for the example, I was absolutely sincere and, misguidedly, conveyed that sincerity to the point that people believed “I” was telling the truth, it would not take a genius to conclude I was in error. lying astonautTransferring that reasoning by involving government, popular confusion might become clearer. Let us suppose (along similar lines of said reasoning) that “government” decided the moon was made of cheese. To state their case, they sent an astronaut in a rocket to procure some of this mysterious brie. As instructed, astronaut returns, years later, with several vintage samples. Of course, they weren’t actually from the moon that he had not visited. The people, nevertheless, had been presented (with due pomp) their superficial prize, and, just as the king with no clothes, they could not help but believing. Our magnificent astronaut (who, once again, had never left the planet) was given a hero’s status, speaking at universities, writing for scientific journals about his moon visit and, generally, spinning fantasy into reality.

feeding lambs of GodThose that believe governments are “for the people” are as deluded as those that believe an astronaut went to the moon for cheese and consequentially wilfully defy reason to empower make-believe. Deep historic research into the point and purpose of governments will find little more than commerce management systems. From that perspective, “the people” are either slaves or masters. Theoretically, those that unplug from the system either don’t exist or are considered similar in status to wild animals. That is why strict legislation for “feeding the homeless (wild animals)” is gradually being imposed. A technologically inspired ever widening gap between the masters and their slaves has made mass labour superfluous in many ways. crossroads3Political controllers never really wanted to concede Victorian determinism which saw the underclasses routinely displayed as gibbet corpses for daring to feed themselves independently. Those that abided by the law and starved in plain sight were the cause of humorous foul smelling puns for those languishing at elite dinner tables. 9f7ef9a904ff26b6e948d13b21553f3cLaws protected the lands of the masters in spite of the needs of the people. That fundamental objective (Victorian determinism) of the political machine may be buried in periods of rebellion, but never forgotten. That is the reason why governments are so eager to use war as the rule over matters requiring arbitration, for a slave’s life is demonstrated as being worth nothing.

Many de-facto journalists pin extraordinary faith on mechanisms defining order, such as the “Bill of Rights”, “Constitution” and “Due Process”. However, the system is based on three interconnecting cogs with differing agendas, objectives and powers. Law makers pretend to sell laws to the people and, after their theatre, wizened lawyers (usually affiliated to external instruments such as the Jewish Lobby) ensure the small print is covered with cheese. Thus, almost invariable, the actual laws are nothing like the sales pitch. Without a “Justice System”, laws are not worth the paper they are written on. Just as with political organs, a careful selection process ensures only judiciaries of the right mindset rule and, if anything goes wrong after appointment, bad eggs are expediently and mercilessly expelled. Judges almost always do as they are instructed by the mainstream Medias (which also happen to be Jewish lobbyists).

judge dredIt takes more than judges and politicians to ensure the criminally homeless do not roam the streets. Using the same tried and tested principles designed to attract natural born killers for the armed forces, sociopath traitors are encouraged to apply to become responsible law enforcement officers. Recruits must demonstrate they can and will follow any order, regardless of content, without hesitation. Any officer that dares to think is deemed to be of the wrong character and must join our newly criminally homeless judges with conscience. The only room for debate as to interpretation of laws is permissible sentiment speculated by the mainstream Medias. Anyone with even a remote attachment to alternative information sources will quickly realise the mainstream loves cheese.

There is no politician or political party in place to save the individual. Law courts and their enforcers vigorously uphold the most unfair, demeaning, unrepresentative legislation then dressed as laws to the letter. Individual laws do voice extremist corporate, religious and other whims usually actually catering for minorities (when true purposes are known). Even so, the court system is limited by size and works as any other instrument of commerce, underpinned by strict targets and quotas. This is complimented by law enforcement agencies that are welcome to set up illegitimate, criminal fronts (sting operations) in the interest of fighting crime. Important captives’ unsubstantiated violations are recklessly promoted as proxy guilt confessions by those cheese loving mainstream Medias. Indeed, regularly, law enforcement public statements are presented “word for wordwithout question by all news outlets.

We, the people and presumed slaves, are ultimately faced with the responsibility of either believing the bullshit or maintaining individual open minds determined to sanctify truth at any price. creative-and-critical-thinking-1-638Those are the two poles. In practicality, no one can know the whole truth and judgement boils down to belief in the effectiveness of information source and intuition. Over time, differences in accounts, shared information presented by disparate sources and limited direct experience may improve any given snapshot of wisdom. Fall prey to the notion “who do we believe?” is to succumb to bullshit. Critical thinkers will neither accept any proposal lacking tangible evidence or effective supporting arguments nor do they have any beliefs per se. It is high time the rest of you took a leaf out of that book. Put to the test, given the correct weight of plausible information sources not affiliated to the mainstream, lowly minds will struggle to deny the truth.

Newly converted reasoning individuals are caught between the system they used to abide and the sense of, what can be best described as, impotence. As deluded group members, they felt potentially empowered, at least. Now, as enlightened individuals, the reactive impetus shifts to “little me against lots of them”. It is only through awareness of individuality that all those instruments of power become clear. What is the alternative to the banking system? If I cannot abide corporates; where do I shop? Is new enlightened me allowed express integrity and work? What should (can) I, the individual, do about government tyranny of past, present and future? But, most importantly, am I of any value to “humanity” at all? This is an important question as governments, per false belief systems, are heralded as the apex of social goodwill. The path to enlightenment reveals governments are nothing other than polished “mafias” exploiting goodwill.

Newly converted Individuals quickly realise their impact against the machine is so severely limited it dwindles into insignificance. Not only that but any reaction requires inconvenience, sacrifice and loss. These happen to be the three things humans, in general, least like being. Therefore, the only realistic force against the machine is not one of physical might but, rather, the power of boycott. Slaves that refuse to enable the machine, refuse to cooperate, refuse to work en masse would be the system’s downfall. However, subtle, subliminal rebellion is far more effective. Dare I say, “Use that cheese against the bastards”?


It is time for us to move away from guilt by association paradigms, grotesque caricatures overstating zealous morals. It is time for us to get real about reality. Government mechanisms, infrastructures and methods are not all bad. There is a terrific amount of good stuff attached to network and, surprisingly, a lot of would-be good people oiling the cogs that make the wheels go round. Money and banks are not all bad, providing strict controls are adhered to. Corporations could be the model of efficiency and high standards. Africa is an apex of disinformationHere’s an example of a possible boycott. A mystery corporation is doing some very bad things in Africa. All able bodied employees of the slave classes have already set up a guild or union with a spokesperson for US Head quartered operations. Without immediate cessation of proceedings in Africa, ever able bodied worker would strike and picket the US headquarters. If that is too drastic, workers could simply ignore any order, distribution requirements, paperwork and so on coming out of Africa. Just let it all pile up, no arbitration, no militancy. Everyone plays dumb; just like the government. Sure, many would be fired, but new replacements would quickly learn the culture.

If anyone has any other good ideas on how to “keep the bastards honest”, don’t be shy. Comments are welcome and thank you for listening.


Time: The Great Quandry

51gTKHWX+cL._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_Recently I offered a completely-unseen-before excerpt of my now print-friendly book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (See to Global Freedom Movement (See subscribers. So, I thought, in the spirit of illumination, Ozzie Thinker bloggers might appreciate the information.

Feedback from my Fans

It is only a short book (under 20,000 words), but, within, texts compress wisdom of great power; some Ideas so transcendental in nature they are not of this Earth. These are no ordinary writings. Up-and-coming American musician, Andy Duong (See, reached out and donated for his copy. Secretly (he told me later) he thought I was just another one of those “know-it-all’s” and bought the book merely to pull it apart. However, after reading it, his sentiment changed.

I went ahead and read your book last night. Very powerful stuff. Lots of odd connections were made [leading up to donating for your book]. Your content was challenging, empowering at times […] and a little disturbing […] because of the materialism [criticisms]. […] It is an excellent book. I want to read it again [in a much slower and thought provoking fashion].” AD

Another fan is somebody rather closer to home. You all should know him by now. Brendan D Murphy’s donation didn’t break any records, but as an Australian luminary, I would have probably given him a copy, if pressed. His feedback can be reduced to a single short sentence:

It was just like my book.” BDM

9781452507118_COVER_FQA.inddThat is the greatest compliment anyone could have given me. There’s a little bit of Narcissus (See in all of us. Trust me “The Grand Illusion” is Brendan’s baby. For him to place my book of equal status is, well, I have already said it, the greatest compliment anyone could give.

As I had already released a preview in “Is Science Illusory”, I had planned to tempt donators with the “Preface” (See, but after some stern words of caution from my American fan, I have decided to take a different tack.

[The Preface is] too anti-materialism, only harping on the negative. Your book [on the other hand] is mostly positive and undeniably uplifting – an immensely deep, profound read.” AD

A Fresh Approach

I need a different tack because I am disappointed. Any normal person would have presumed that a small, but robustly vocal following would have amounted to numerous, doting donators eager for an enlightenment download. Not so, I’m afraid. It is as if, with all that “cute talk” about it, next to no one is interested in having existence explained. They take sanctity in the shark infested dark waters of ignorance.

Fewer than 100 copies have been dispatched including giveaways. What a sorry outcome for a year’s perspiration devoted to genius? You guys can make a difference. You can turn things around and give ignorance a hiding. Before I roll out the big guns and eye candy to tip those teetering on the brink, I can say, wholeheartedly, that I have listened [to critics]. Jesting aside, honestly I would be so appreciative if everyone ran with this ball, not only donating but also tenaciously spreading the good news on personal networks. Oh boy, that would make me happy.

People said to me, “We don’t like no e-books {the double negative seemed to figure here]. So I have created a version that will print as 24 pages of unadulterated, lovingly crafted text (you can even toss the preface and lose 2 more pages). There is no point in “publishing it” because, in light of its size, that would be overkill. The way publishing works, as Brendan will tell you, is it’s not the size that counts. Therefore, the price of producing 20,000 words is about the same as a 200,000 word edition! Crazy, I know, but that’s the business.

A Pretty Face is the Best Anonymous Fan

MsXopPbgAimee Devlin, given her proximity to Brendan, I’m pretty sure has probably read “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. She hasn’t given any direct feedback, but I know she would have loved it even if posthumously. Even though her mind would match the average professor’s, they say “eye candy” sells, so it gives me a chance to show off the face of a pretty anonymous fan.

Let’s be honest, when all said and done, it is the blessed text that should promote the book. latestThat’s what people are donating for. So, without further ado, I have selected a never-seen-before (with the exception of the various donors) snippet aimed at knocking the sooks off. The problem with this, for anyone that saw the relevant hilarious Big Bang Theory episode (See with Sheldon trying to select the perfect birthday gift for his girlfriend (another Aimee [Amy], as it happens), is judgement is largely determined by taste or “one person’s perfume is another’s poison”. Even so, if Mayim Bialik counted as a fan that would really give me a boost.

Profound wisdom from Ozzie Thinker

…All dimensions consist of up to four simple elements; pulses, force fields, waves and frequencies. Similar symmetry is found in cosmic code. The Genome Project has identified a variation (or symptom) of DNA that consists of four chemical elements which, in correct combination, can create anything. There is nothing beyond the power of creation.

indie-rock-musician-wallpaper-3-2-s-307x512A big part of the creation process is perception. Indeed, without perception nothing would exist. Yes, I have heard all those Zen-style arguments about trees falling in unimagined woods which have not been witnessed. However, if there was no perception, existence would not exist because there would be no awareness of it. Perception is a cooperation of existence and awareness. In the case of human beings, the cooperation is selective. We are all surrounded by extra-dimensional entities all the time, but the majority [of us] cannot see due to limited [which is also arguably flawed through limitation] perception. Our perception is designed to make sense of our reality. In fact, more so that reality is our “sense”. Considering my earlier introduction of the mysterious False Matrix, this opens the door to the probability of external influences manipulating how [our] vision is rationalised. A constant electronic mass Media stream shaping opinions to ensure conditioning is the ultimate way of securing imperfection. The False Matrix is a hidden, much more subtle and vastly superior version. Because we rely on our sense of reality, instinctively, we are more likely to block than accept change and this adds to the vile assault on human will, the discovery tour and, as a consequence, balanced investigation. Many would go so far as denying or attacking change for change’s sake in order to preserve their reality. As no single voice plagues society with its exclusive brand of mediocrity, our paradigm can be extended to clashes of culture. Muslims want a Muslim world and defy those that stand in their path. Strict homosexuals, as a variation, might concede bi-sexuality in order to preserve their social acceptability and respectability.

Self-expression invariably relies on cultivating many voices combined as the monotonous chiming “royal we”. The group transcends the self and the art of propaganda belies imagining a group identity even if it does not exist. The pinnacle of Globalist exploit is being conducted to the tune of xenophobic Zionism. This is something that goes way beyond Judaism and is certainly no expression of faith. In fact, the reverse is true. Zionism, unsurprisingly, is an apex of exo-politics. The same pretend factions, visible and invisible, have precipitated proxy order of differing brands through the ages. They fabricated history to censor comprehension. Courtesy of the anthropomorphic field that governs how we react to the astral plane (giant highway that comprises all dimensions and timelines), it is impossible to suppress the truth. Parties to the deceit with clear vision have but three options. They can ridicule that which contradicts their fantasy using terminal props supported by corrupt academics. When that ruse fails, it is then only possible to censor, lose or forget key transgressions against the tyranny that holds power. Finally, only assault and death will bury voices that pierce totalitarianism. History needed to be painstakingly rewritten to cover the tracks of those that lead. The most critical misdemeanour has been the erasure of the true origins (note plural) of man. Chapter two, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity and its Practical Implications”, will redeem conscientious readers. Truth has been in front of your noses all along. “Vision” is all that was ever required.

Existence is much more complex than humanity and its mainstream science supposes. I have explained why the academic community, guided by reductionist/materialist peer groups, cannot or will not comprehend value added existence in the preceding paragraphs. Now I shall attempt to decode the greatest secret of all. It is important to start by saying that though we rationalise time as linear, it is anything but. In fact there is an attractive magnetic force which acts as an unseen guide, something I call blueprint time in other writings. As we shall learn blueprint time is not likely limited to a single print. The same way a prolific painter maps out his latest grand masterpiece, so too are cornerstone events etched into blueprint time. These act as anchors that, in many ways, puncture the fabric that connects dimensional realities. Time itself is series of static scenarios which might appear in chronological order should the experiencer rationalise them that way. Perhaps rationalise is the wrong word. We attach or pin ourselves to each new scenario in an order we call chronological. From this rationalisation of what we generally call “reality”, blueprint time runs in the reverse direction. In other words it starts at the end and finishes at the beginning as scenarios needed to be prepared for attachment in chronological order. Attachments are presented as “menus” that reflect the choices a user faces for any given moment. In its “raw state”, time consists of a hotch-potch of unordered scenarios, thus going forwards or backwards is either the illusion for the experiencer or the determination of the planner. Remembering our earlier gateaux analogy, time is the ingredients randomly arranged, blueprint time is the recipe, and linear existence the cake.

Are you all intrigued?

animal-farm1I think that sample is incomplete and enticing enough to summon brave truth seekers. But, maybe freedom is actually “change without revision”? That would mean we can review the same old worn out theories re-dressed as “new truths” for perseverance of liberty. That, in context, of course, would mean “new freedom” is precisely the same as old slavery; as George Orwell so aptly expressed in “Animal Farm” (See For me, freedom begins with clarity of purpose, cosmic laws and comprehension of the divine. That is why I cannot understand why people haven’t scaled glacial peaks to access fundamental truths.

Really, once again, it boils down to change with or without revision. Those that see value in revision should donate for my book without hesitation. Our remaining, inquisitive inept[s], fearful of detachment from the safety of “the system”; you need to take a walk on the wild side. The worst that could happen is you become more certain of the beliefs you already have.

You’ve convinced us. Where the hell do we donate?

You can seek the book out on Book Tango or Amazon, but due to its larger font size, printing will be a nightmare. Alternatively, and preferably, donations are welcome here ( or

Stop press!!! I now also teach concert piano (skype sessions would be possible for overseas students, but check out my Youtube channel first: see and regularly perform here (See (It’s only $5 entrance to cover nibbles and drinks – everyone’s welcome).