Are Cells More Intelligent Than Bodies?

This post has been inspired by regular commenter, the vegan satirical poet, Peter Schreiner. A small video explained the extraordinary, perhaps paranormal, properties of the cephalopods. Though ideas will be expressed normally, some of the concepts and progress of modern, dare I say it, mainstream science is nothing short of miraculous. The problem is that everyone, including most of the scientists themselves, takes the miraculous for granted.

There are things I know because I know them. Others are the result of guesswork or painstaking deduction, usually, partially at least, aided by experience or evidence. The way I know makes me completely unique or, should I say, I have not met another who knows the way I know. Tomorrow I will know something I have always known, but did not know it today. Insomuch as I have the ability to delve into the depths of my mind and find something that preceded this life, or was it something to come? Logic dictates it must have happened for a memory to have existed and one hopes memories are secured by experience or evidence. Nevertheless, knowing what I know, reality looks nothing like logic; it would not surprise me if my channels were timeless.

Dr Bruce Lipton occupies the border of mainstream science. As I mentioned in Real History Connects with Purpose – Part Two, were it not for SARS it would be likely he would be unknown. The idea of non-nucleic cells is not new. Critical thinkers published the notion in 1960’s, but were debunked as “kooks” by the mainstream. Oh sweet sorrow, how fickle that mainstream is. I am deliberately not going to refer to Lipton’s new biology as there may be differences in my presentation. To simplify the theory, mirroring truth, cells have hair like antennas which give them a 360 degree snapshot of their environment. Information is collected by them and uploaded to build a program which comprises cell operations, behaviour and type. Scientists involved with the revolutionary bio printing technologies have also recognised the extraordinary properties of cells, which not only specialise, such as the beating heart cell, but “instinctivelyknow what to do. Therefore a culture of “random” cellular materials will literally organise itself into position. Without that miraculous aid, there would be no bio printing.

Russian experiments manipulating microwave frequencies confused a chicken into producing a duck as offspring and a frog to bear a salamander. Then the properties of so-called junk DNA were put under scrutiny. To be accurate, the chicken produced a hybrid “ducken” or “chuck”, but the enigma was the same. Frog egg cells in foetal state miraculously designed a salamander which was not in any way related to progeny. Nevertheless, parental characteristics were likely to have been apparent. The important point is, which is clear from these experiments, cells both have access to and interpret DNA code and the properties of this DNA code goes beyond the body. As I have already stated elsewhere and on a number of occasions, DNA is processed by the electromagnetic field that connects the Earth to our Sun. The same electromagnetic field consists of an infinitely flexible number of impetuses which express themselves as resonances to become the souls that power life. A body is a dead battery until it is charged.

I have appeared to move away from the topic, “Are cells more intelligent than bodies?” Though, the point I am trying to make is the mind is a separate entity (as demonstrated by the Scole Experiment) and, as such, it is directly relevant. Indeed, I might be so bold as to say it is the key. Though scientifically unverifiable, Sixto Paz Wells has laid claim, via Nordic channels off the Saturn Ganymede moon, that thought beings exist in the D8-10 band (although the separation of dimensions and densities becomes confusing with the number of definitions or standards). If it could be scientifically verified, the brain would simply be another group of cells. The fact the body dies, inexplicably, suggests it is powered by an external source or sources. Science making observations as to causes of death does not explain why the body dies. Indeed the death of the body is scientifically miraculous as it can be intact, but no longer functions life. No matter what science does, after a certain point it cannot restart life.

Those who have studied Sixto Paz Wells have also learned that one of the significant differences between the beings on Ganymede and normal humans is they live for two to three thousand years (by our time measurements). This, he informs us, is because they have the ability to regenerate at the cellular level using their minds. As he also explains they have a fourth dimension existence, it would be unscientific to compare our D3 existence with theirs. However, it does sow the seeds for the last part of this discussion. Also should anyone propose that NASA organise a trip to Ganymede to prove the existence of these enigmatic beings, assuming that was the correct Jupiter moon, D4 cannot be experienced in conscious state by most humans. Therefore even if they found them, they would likely be hidden in plain sight. Cynics may also question NASA’s integrity gauging its chequered past outside its own eternal sycophantic network of political correctness. For NASA findings and revelations are independent beasts. Mind you, they are not all bad.

I have not lost sight of the fact the reason for the creation of this post was the dear old cephalopods. Unlike the primitive chameleons, cephalopods can change colour and shape almost instantaneously. They, also, continually change. Nevertheless, scientists deduce the three levels of visual change; colour, texture, shape are an illusion. This illusion is manufactured via the management of skin pigment and rigidity. This has opened the door to an unwelcome reality; humans cannot see. The deeper and more uncomfortable question might sound something like, if we cannot see what is the value of sciences which rely on validating reality? Does science possess the power to transcend perception? The cephalopods open another murky avenue of consideration. They have the ability to mimic shape shifting so well the viewer is compelled to believe they have transmogrified. Their instantaneous and perpetual management of skin is so miraculous it begs the question whether mind management of entire cell structures might be equally possible.

Those in the know know that the Annunaki live in our oceans. This is not to say these are the descendants of the creators of Homo Negro, but, indeed, more likely are hybrids themselves. They have been filmed, photographed and skeletons are regularly spirited away to vast repositories which hide most evidence which contradict political detent. Euphemistically called mermen and mermaids, they have a special relationship with dolphins which, science refuses to accept, communicate, or perhaps sentiment is changing? As the dolphins are the low vibrational bodies of the Arcturian Elders (“Zetas”) the special relationship with the Earth bound Annunaki should be of no surprise. At the highest level, the Aryan-Annunaki, Arcturians, “Luciferians” (I cannot create a pronounceable name) and Thoth types control everything here. The rest are all bit players. The interesting fact about the mermen and mermaids, in relation to this article, is they appear to have the ability to manage cellular generation in D3. Mainstream science cannot embrace that which is denied, but if it could the mystery would be how they can manufacture fully functional human looking bodies and move from a piscine environment to land without the need of any intermediate adaptation stage. Without science the observer can only guess the mechanics, but a clue might be the short lifespan of their transmogrification.

The few references I have scrutinised claim the maximum effect would be a few hours. After that these beings are unable to keep up the illusion. Illusion is probably the wrong word, but they do not seem to do anything different to the cephalopods. Instead of managing skin appearance, they manage entire cell groups using their minds. The cephalopods have given some insight into what is possible given the right genetic makeup. The only reason we cannot shape shift is we are either not able, which is likely, or we do not remember how. As recently deceased (or is this another sick CIA psy-op?) Lloyd Pye was adamant that we are part Annunaki, have we merely forgotten how to manage our bodies? Are cancers evidence of the breakdown of the relationship between mind and body?

Dimensions and densities do not appear to be clean and accountable. For some time, I have considered the idea that minor shifts in DNA will evoke a different frequency resonance. Evolution is an illusion that mirrors DNA shifts. My wider consideration has been as to whether dimension bands are clean or otherwise. Currently I have concluded the process might be compared to frequency changes on a transistor radio, which tunes in and out. As the signal weakens features are apparent but remain unclear. Thus, can this reasoning be applied to dimensions; as those in D3 tune in to D4, features become clear? We know of the extraordinary shape shifting abilities of the Alterians, Phalzants, Drakkon, Moth Men and a wide range of other, often, indescribable entities. Yes, all-too-real looking holographic projections have been encountered on numerous occasions too, but they are a safety procedure (it is impossible to kill a holographic image). The Zetas these days use their minds to power small polished discs, which are propelled at mind boggling speeds. In the old days, they used carpets and even broomsticks. There are some spacecraft which become a living symbiosis with the flier. Pilots plug in using various advanced technologies to become living ships. Might we experience some miraculous abilities as DNA takes us ever near D4? Even now, I believe, some of us can tune into paranormal features.

For me it is certain intelligence transcends cells and bodies.

Advertisements

Christmas in the Fourth Dimension

With two hundred and forty three hours in every day, Christmas in the fourth dimension is nothing short of value packed. You really feel like you are having a day to remember; although, then again, Christmas might be the short one. There is a day with only three hours. They can do that there; in the fourth dimension. Or, rather, we can!

Yes, they say, “Have a nice day” “Do come again” to those that visit. And those that don’t we must assume, by the same token, are most welcome; or, at least, that’s what they say. For those who haven’t been, it is a most topsy-turvy place. Up is down and down is up, or, is that the other way round; perhaps both? Strange creatures are to be found; some so strange they shouldn’t be there at all. What………unicorns!? Pah! They are commonplace here, well, there. A dime a dozen, oh but as majestic and graceful in flight as anything you will ever see. Yes, something to behold, but there is another thing. They are infectious. Aren’t they just? No need for cupid while the unicorns reign. As they are everywhere, please keep your voices down otherwise they’ll hear, the mayor wants them culled. Ahem, he’s a Globalist of course, no surprise.

The crotchety old dragon in the big east cave most assuredly does not breathe fire. Those shining plumes are only a fashion accessory. I must say they do make him look rather grand. Though, I confess, if there was a Scrooge of the fourth dimension, he would be it. You see, they fuss; the dragons that is. If they simply carried on regardless, well they would be heroes of old. But, no, they always have to stick their noses in. Some don’t have noses, as such, but they find something to stick in that’s just as bad. Look, I know they mean well, but it just isn’t Christmas.

If I were to be sorry for something, it would be for the apes, or that’s what we call them here. In fact, I don’t know if they have even been invited. But, I suppose, having no heads makes things difficult. Their periscope eyes don’t help. Let’s face it; all three seem to have minds of their own. There are strict privacy laws here and I assure you the stricter they are the more private they become. Of course, the apes like to clamber all over those old fashioned box skyscraper buildings, doing apish things. Harmless fun; I don’t think they are even used these days. As we all know, decent folks live in spheres. Given a big enough area, the floor will be as flat as any box. Although, I must admit, it is exhilarating to host a banquet on the ceiling of one of those Rococo grand mansions, chandeliers ‘n all.

And it would not be Christmas without a feast. This year the dragons are doing it. Now I know what you are all going to say, but, frankly I agree. However, we cannot sink to the racist depths of those who eternally yen to destroy the spirit of Christmas. The dragons believe they are fun and they do do good magic. Everyone can agree on that. So the dragons are hosting Christmas this year. It’ll be neat. Remember last year I wore that water suit and the Kryllians tried to drink it. They should have known better. Oh, but was it last year? These long days make everything seem like eternity.

I felt it was a bit lazy to let the manuscripts make the music; as beautiful as it was. But, nothing beats watching fine artisans being creative. Oh, that’s right, the dratted Globalists organised last Christmas; probably friends of the mayor. Presents were out as they conflicted with the quota system.  Half the guests never received invites as they were wanted. Nobody has told me what they were wanted for. At least the dragons will invite everybody. Everyone can be assured they have been given strict orders not to eat any of the guests. We have been explicit and have had to put our foot down after….well, let’s not dwell on that.

Nobody believes they were holographs. And as for the Ceremony of Lipithuliphet, well, I cannot find a single person who’s heard of it. Even the wise vines of Auglothigol say it is nonsense. Time patches may be possible, but guests do not like to be eaten. Period! That’s why we’ve put our foot down this time. Those bloody Globalists and their offer of prime propaganda. Well Globalists your propaganda wouldn’t convince a two year old….with knobs on. “Dragons are nasty”. So, tell us something we don’t already know? Besides, dragons aren’t all bad. In fact, some say they only look frightening.

Let’s face it; they can do a really good show. Dynamo move on. Mind you that fusion of gothic and technology seems to transport the viewer into some kind of futuristic horror movie. But it is surely worth it for the effects. Wow……..and some! They take horror to a new level, all in the spirit of fun, of course. Oh yes! No, seriously, you’ve gotta love them. You really do not want to criticise them. That’s the safe way. They might only look terrifying.

Dragons do have their cuddly side. They tell me once you become familiar with their routine, all is good. That’s providing you are not eaten, of course, but I wouldn’t have thought that would have happened much; although, bizarrely, I have not yet found anyone who is familiar with their routine. Just a coincidence, I’m sure. They’re a good bunch of guys, ahem, the dragons that is. It is lucky for the penguins.

Or, rather, I think that is what they are. Nothing is as it seems in the fourth dimension. Everything certainly is larger than life here and when it’s not larger, well, it’s smaller, of course. They are fluffy, chirpy and resilient just as you would expect penguins to be. So I am satisfied. They are penguins. They tell me the dragons aren’t all that bad. A lot of it’s for show, they say. Oh yes and those disappeared critics, well they’re on holiday on the moon; all expenses paid. We’re not sure which moon, but it’s alright for some. No doubt a view with two suns and a blue planet while we’re all stuck in the drudgery of the fourth dimension.

We are pretty lucky to have what we have. Christmas would not the same without the town crier. Of course, the rest of the year he’s a Danish prince peeing in a fountain. Out of the ashes, poof, there’s a metamorphosis. Adonis rises.  Doesn’t everyone one love the penguins dance. They certainly show the Christmas spirit. Even the dragons might have a cuddly side. They do love the penguins, but I haven’t met anyone who hasn’t been smitten at first sight.

The penguins knew something else about the dragons; why they are scary. It is this that might have been behind their reputation, for dragons are judges. Good judges strip their defendants bare and expose their true characters. As everyone is just a little bit naughty, no wonder we were all apprehensive at Christmases presided over by dragons. Everyone loves presents and presents make Christmas in the fourth dimension the same as every other. Of course, Christmas should also be about all those noble traits; honour, compassion, humility, fairness, faith and, most of all, the most avoided trait of all; truth. Blinkered truth in a rose tinted world is not truth and that is what the dragons expose and that is why they are so feared.

Now, without any further ado, the dragons cordially invite everyone to their season’s feast. Gifts are a prerequisite. Each attendee must present courage, kindness, gallantry, patience, charity, mercy, honesty, generosity, loyalty, courtesy, cheerfulness, love, curiosity, accountability, enthusiasm or commitment to an unknown stranger. It should be neatly wrapped and tied up in a pretty little bow.

This is the spirit of Christmas in the fourth dimension.

God Is Corrupt and Knows It

The deepest eternal question is; if God is corrupt can “He” selfheal?

Let us not drag this down into the puerile debate as to if there is or isn’t a God or which religious dogma is better. This discussion is about what is and possibly what was but certainly is not to do with what might be.  The problems now were the problems then and they occurred for the simplest of reasons which, innocently, was an engineering problem. However, that innocent problem precipitated into a conflict between humbleness and arrogance. When arrogance “won”, the Satan Star collapsed. The same arrogant forces’ ruinous nuclear objectives are today ever deaf to the desires of the peace accord. It is “you do as we say” versus “you do as you desire”.

For those who don’t recall my other writings, bliss is the kernel of a giant black hole which NASA compares to the mass of a million stars (even though stars are actually zero point access ‘vents’), if they have the right one, of course. The torque of the opposing forces is so great it has become the spigot of a giant invisible wheel, by which universes are perpetually dragged in rotation. Astrophysicists will be able to complicate that model but, in a sense, the Satan Star collapse began motion and linear time in the physical sense.  As bad as some make out the event to be, it wasn’t that bad. In fact there were some positives – US. Without the electrically charged sub-particle dark matter, there was nothing to build with.

I am going to keep the paragraphs small for clarity. We know, from my previous writings, that a consequence of Satan was to pump dark matter into space and that is the building blocks for our reality. Though individual sub-particles are individually charged, the energy is independent of the network. Therefore dark matter is can be unruly when it is free from the influence of visible or invisible light (Spiritualists might rationalise this as blessed or unblessed). As soon as there is a connection to this light (as it is everything that exists) the conflict between will and unruliness is exposed. Utopia suggests “I do as I desire but also do as He (God) says”. Instead there is desire versus order. In an attempt resolve this conflict, the spiritual body will find a compromise which aims to balance the absolutes; desire and will [of God] for the many carnations required. Will conquering desire is the why the medieval discipline of self-flagellation occurred. It was determined that desire was Satanic and therefore the opposite must be anything undesirable. Thus, by this reasoning, the undesirable is the will of God.

It was a nice try, but it did not capture the heart of the problem. Besides, there are many desirable things that are clearly good if goodness is measured as the best compromise for satisfaction or contentment of all. Morality, by medieval times, had become a bureaucracy and nothing sacred. Followed numerous inquisitions and, though for the most part these were politically motivated, a re-evaluation of faith happened in the 1840’s. This culminated in the forming of aggressive and vocal peace movements in the 1880’s. Much of the basis for modern morality stems from exhaustive late Victorian debates as to what constitutes human rights. The emancipation of women evolved into the suffragette movement (an idea that began in the 1860’s) which became a noticeable force prior to the First World War. This is in line with the logical discovery, that will must be the contented order of everything; the desirous individual being one part.

Unsurprisingly, new freedoms evoked an elite sexual revolution in the 1920’s. Egged on by the great depression, this was followed by a workers attack on labour laws in 1930’s which, partially, led to Butler’s reforms after the Second World War. Due to austere post war measures to proliferate old order (synthetic will) in the 1950’s, the great peoples sexual revolution of the 1960’s once and for all broke the back of religious idealism. Indeed the 1960’s were so catastrophic for the imposers of synthetic will (Globalists who forge a racist paradise with unlimited slaves), they were forced to reengineer their twenty five year plans between 1971-75. For clarity, twenty five year plans might predict scenario outcomes stretching millennia ahead.

My original summary of God’s corruption could be redefined. Whereas the analogy of humbleness and arrogance at the polls illustrates the spirit of the problem, there is a better description for the mechanics. One view was it must be perfect because it is because there is “no need to reinvent the wheel”. The other, opposite view, was experience could only discovered [through trial and error] and for that reason alone there was a “need for change”. As a side note, the spore activated network of zero point vents which acted as release points for invisible energy, was a trial. This resulted in the collapse of the Satan Star, which was an error, but that error was the building blocks of our universe. Without it we would not exist. The poet Walt Whitman expressed well the difference between idealism and realism. It has always been a conflict between conservatism and progressivism. That conflict continues today and it stretches way beyond this planet. We are a tiny part of the problem. However, the problem is acutely noticeable here. It is contained with the two fundamental religious designs.

The conservatives appreciate Zoroastrianism. This is now Judaism, Islam, Christianity and others. The progressives love Buddhism. This is now Hinduism, Taoism, Christianity and others. As neither is pure or absolute, there are many crossovers. So much so in the case of Christianity, its followers are split between the two ideas. That is why Jesus has become a Paper Mache Messiah. Ancient texts are records so, for instance, the Old Testament Bible hides ancient Babylonian “secret” technologies and the I Ching is a “Genome manual” amongst other things. Incidentally scholars struggle with Fu Xi’s ancient discovery and it is categorised as a historic and not a religious document. No wonder! In fact there are only three constants which determine expressive reality (of which ours is a small part). There are pulses, force fields and frequencies. DNA determines how they will be experienced. Changes to DNA are controlled by [God’s] will.

Though there are many dualities, there is one other worthy of highlight in the context of this article. After Hegel, this is called the power dialectic. There are those who control through assertion versus those with belief through knowledge. As true knowledge is both hard to come by and often a lifelong quest, assertion is the quick and easy route. That is why value can be what anyone with authority asserts. That is why a conviction is more important than culpability. That is why, ultimately, if God existed He would be corrupt and those in authority would be exposed as scandalous liars. The liars for the greater good have now chosen atheism as the new safe way.

Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons

I had originally planned to simply copy paste the introduction to Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons for a humble yet shameless plug. However, as it begins with an exhaustive background to existence; the elements which make up what is, our reality being a very tiny part, it is not that much different to anything in the science of existence or deep, hidden and real history sections of this website. I decided I needed something to knock the socks off. Therefore, more appropriate, I felt, would be something that is completely different, unique in its way and representative of the core identity of the book. Therefore I have decided to write something about the Drakkon, which some call the Draco. As such I believe this brief but weighty piece is unique insomuch as, of its type, this is the only source of literature available publicly or privately. Whether it knocks the socks off or not, it certainly defies the well intentioned though partisan ramblings of David Icke (“Hidden Hand” plant) and others of his ilk. The Drakkon are very clearly linked to the corruption of good and evil, but not in the way esoteric writings indicate or David Icke [for the large part] and the next post will explain why and how. Seventy per cent drafted, it will be titled “God Is Corrupt and [He] Knows It”.

I have a favour to ask of you four or five regulars and anyone else who wants to contribute. Would you wish to buy my book and how much would you pay for it? Take into account this is not going to be yet another re-examination of ancient texts or opinion on visible or hidden artefacts. It will not be scientific because it is beyond science. Most importantly, it will be one of a kind and the only reference point of its type. What is that worth? If there are any would be investors, with very deep pockets, any offer of support would be gratefully received. Unlike David Rockefeller Investments Incorporated, you would need to be a true philanthropist as I guarantee only money will be lost. Decent feedback is appreciated.

The whole notion of good and bad is entirely wrong and, in fact, good was bad and bad was good, but now badness is corrupt so both good and bad are bad. The good, bad paradigm is actually, “We are right and you are wrong”. Virtue does not come into the equation, other than the bad are the most virtuous, most courageous and most truthful. Or rather they used to be. Now there is only room for deception. The movers and the shakers are the best deceivers. The whole idea behind [animal or human] sacrifice sums up our universal culture of slavery where we are right and you are wrong. This may have been obscured in modern times, but the sacrificial beast had never had a say on any great provenance. That is some joyous party when you are served up for supper or, perhaps, are only given a torturous death in praise of God. What sort of God would accept this “praise”? Only an aberration! It is praise which shows utter contempt of life.

In addition, this excerpt is specifically written for my blog and may not find its way into Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons. The information contained certainly will.

According to esoteric history, the Drakkon created the Draco, which, in turn, were also geneticists who manufactured their own creatures. This, as with most alternative histories, is partially correct, though misleading. There aew much higher forces governing these bloodlines. Everything goes right to the top. But I will start  the beings which may be able to manifest in D5 (fifth dimension). These are all-powerful thought beings which occupy dimensions eight through ten (depending how you define dimension). Lucifer is the stylised name given to one. Entrenched in this vibrational field we call reality, we have no powers and are contained by the rules our sciences partially observe. Just to put things in perspective. There is another physical being (possibly not able to manifest in D3) which has a name which cannot be reproduced by the human pallet and which is more senior than the Drakkon which, in turn, remain phantom. The Drakkon is the most senior so-called reptilian the “conspiracy theorists” focus on. In fact Drakkon is a more precise pronunciation of dragon. Therefore, dragons are (and yes they still very much exist) mystical sages. They look rather odd, but even that is misleading as their physiology works very differently to anything in D3. How do I fit this enormous subject into a tiny excerpt? Well, I shall try.

The first myth I wish to dispel is the reptilian one.  Though there are a large number of reptile-like creatures involved in complex beyond terrestrial influences on this planet and humanity, none [I believe] are actually reptiles. There are cold blooded mammals and a range of warm blooded creatures with pulmonary and gastric systems nothing like anything scientifically assessed on Earth or, at least, publically available. There are creatures without blood, hearts, lungs, brains. In fact any design that scientifically cannot live can! There is one planet with living water. Another has walking vegetation. Forget horses, how about plants that can fly? Beyond the reality science defines in D3 on this planet, there are systems that would shock Peter Pan. Dragons, it will surprise all to learn, are closer related to cats, bats and birds than lizards. The infamous Draco were cut down versions of the dinosaur Tyrannosaurus Rex which, few realise could talk, and now have elegant, well-proportioned human-like frames. These used to be called the Alterians and are colloquially known as Chameleons due to their shape shifting abilities, which will be discussed later. Today under two hundred thousand live in caverns below ground here and are occasionally seen in caves. Their greater population (which may be genetic cousins) are the Imu people which live on a planet supported by the Tau Ceti sun.

Yes the dinosaurs were engineered by the dragons over a significant period, but this was when the Earth was much closer to the sun and it was a greenhouse planet. I am led to believe successful communities took hold, as per the drakkon vision about two hundred and eighty million years ago. The research and development phase spanned over a hundred million years. That changed after the Marduk (pronounced Mal-dek) implosion seventy eight million years ago. However, even in a twenty two degree temperate climate, it took twelve million long years for the dinosaurs to evoke a spectacular DNA shift. Marduk was a dragon planet, so the implications of the attack leading to its implosion are as important as the downsizing of Tiamat and creation of Earth 1.5 billion years ago. The conflict between the same forces continues today hidden in plain sight. Because dragons are relatively ugly in appearance, although I do not see them that way, they personify evil and are branded “bad”. They also oppose the ultimate Annunaki agenda. Agreed, they do support conquest to the death and insist that the defeated should exist in slavish subservience as their lives are “owned” by the conqueror. However, dragon’s slaves are not abused and mostly treated as loved pets. That is because dragons know right from wrong. All lateral threats are exterminated and a careful eye is kept on recalcitrant souls, which are developed in isolation in future bodies to avoid reoccurrence. Dragons know that killing off the threat solves nothing as the same bad souls power each new crop of flesh bodies.

There are three important characteristics which separate the dragons from other social orders. We, humans, like to feel safe. They are incapable of this emotion. Dragons assume everything is threat, but not to a point of paranoia. The Imu peoples, for instance, are renowned for their fearsome defences. Unlike humans, they do not make pre-emptive assaults as a pretext for conquest. They simply ensure any would be attacker is faced with impregnable fortifications protected by unimaginable weaponry, including extra-dimensional illusions. Dragon bodies are confusing as they have the technologies and ability to upload any electromagnetic body (soul) into a new physical body. In fact, in reference to Simon Parkes felines, the queen could either chose to occupy her granddaughter’s physical body or die at the end of her physical life. Therefore the body is viewed as something of a “husk”. Finally, dragons enjoy technology and illusion, so the experiencer is never quite sure as to what is real and what isn’t. They feel they have fun and believe they are fun to be with although they can look quite ferocious and behave energetically. It is their spontaneous and explosive energy that can put the fear of God into any [human] onlooker, but please always remeber this is the way they are. It is not done to harm or even to be provocative or, at least, most of the time! For their pets they do real, extravagant magic (or perhaps “magick”) shows. A favourite is where they lunge with extraordinary power and grace into spontaneous flight only deflate as balloons gently rocking to ground, finally disintegrating as cinders on a fire.

I see a light or white coloured pot-bellied beast sitting on a giant, marble throne (?). It must be at least fifteen feet from head to toe seated. Its arms are bigger than would be expected, but smaller than its kangaroo-like legs. It is enormously flexible, beyond the capability of any human. The face is quite distinctive; grotesque yes, but not unattractive with marked high arched brows. There are certainly human features present or, rather, some features that seem to mimic human characteristics. However, the face is unmistakable and certainly not human by any stretch of the imagination. The one I use as a reference point, sitting on its marble throne, has a small, relatively “human” nose, but I believe others may have long, gnarled snouts. Even in flight, no wings or tail was seen, but that is not to say they were not there, as others have recorded them. Some describe them as deep green with fiery red bellies. Another variant is the brontosaurus type with two fearsome heads on extended necks. That one is so animated it reminds me of the symptoms of those suffering Parkinson’s disease.

I have seen a number of body types. Specifically used by dragons is a creature not dissimilar to Star Trek’s Ferengi. Ferengi-like is an observation as to the shape and character of the visage and not the components; eyes, nose and so on. For instance, the eyes are not even remotely human, being two piercing, twinkling black buttons. These creatures range in size, from mouse or vole right up to gargantuan guards towering a less than elegant eight or nine feet. The so-called large grey (or mother race) which reputed attacked the US engineer Phil Schneider, in fact must be be a hybrid. Its cyber-technology is something one would expect of rebrids. In addition, “large greys” are occasionally seen above ground raiding graves as they ingest putrefied animal/human flesh through their skin. Their “noses” pick up scent for a radius of fifty miles, or so they say. Ironically most are an olive-brown shade, so I don’t know why they are called “grey”. Nevertheless, the Drakkon “ferengi types” are not likely to attack as they are scouts. In order to appear non-threatening to those they visit, I know of none witnessed taller than four foot and many would be a few inches in stature. Second grade dragon souls seem to find their way into bat bodies which range in design enormously. Most famous are the feared Mothmen (possibly responsible for the Count Dracula myths found in Bram Stoker’s writings). However, continuing with examples, there is another type which would be best described as an imp, less than five foot in stature, all black, red eyes, small horns, pointed tail and, of course, stylised bat wings [permanently on view]. Is this the proverbial “devil”? It is indeed quite dangerous; shy but very vindictive.  Another type is very bat like. About human height, its extended wings have fingers on every articulation with maybe up to fifteen each side. This is the one with bright red crystals (rubies?) sewn into each inner to aid inter-dimensional travel or camouflage. Though I cannot see a face, it may have an extended snout. I sense it has a square head which might be described as the human type sometimes called blockhead.  I also sense it is very untrustworthy, though eloquent. It reminds me of one of our mafia stock brokers.

Perhaps I was not specific enough in my description of a dragon’s eyes. The shape of the eyebrow reminds me of the shape of the top of a common chicken’s egg – a pinched, acute circle. It does not seem to be fine hair, as we have, rather, a ridge of hard skin. However, in general, the skin of the dragon is of the texture and touch of the softest, plush leather. It is quite unthreatening and luxurious. There is another possibly related creature that I will describe now, as it does fit in context and will act as a nice bridge to the explanation of the harvesting of souls.  I saw it, not physically but I knew it was there. Taking no steps, it somehow had managed to contort its body from three meters in front of me to a vantage point behind me so I could clearly see its features out of the corner of my left eye. The best way to describe its body’s behaviour was snake-like but it was perhaps closer to one of those strange Marvel Comics’ creations. It was almost human in proportion but so bendy it became supernatural. Just as with the dragons, its arms seemed rather longer that one would expect and, of course, much more flexible than ours. Its visage also had an extremely high brow and, once again, the eye brows were not of fine hair but more like ridge impressions. Those who might occasionally fondly remember the old black & white films of Laurel & Hardy and who recall Stan’s hair scratching blank looks after being sprung for stupidity he could not fathom will surely resonate. You would understand the essence of “snake-man’s” hairless features reminiscent of Stan Laurel’s facial expression. However, its eyes were not blank. They were raging coals, far brighter than any dragons and with such intensity they instilled an awe only capable of the Annunaki.

Unlike the dragon, whose reputation stems more from propaganda and poor judgement than wisdom, these snake-men are vile. Or, at least, the one I witness was. It was scorn, resentment and mistrust in one neat package. I have written that our women use our men as emotional overcoats. This creature does the reverse. It is a parasite wishing to impose an emotional skin on its victim. Talking of skin, I did not describe its physical nature and shall do so now to complete the profile. Though I did not have the inclination to touch and feel, I can describe the skin type, which is most strange. It looks just like our skin but is a light deep olive (yes that is the best way to describe it; a light, deep olive). Perhaps it is anaemic as it seems ghostly pale and dark at the time. Anyway, the skin texture gives the sense it may be made up of microscopically fine scales and not a composition like ours after all.  I did mention the Annunaki earlier, which may leave some readers intrigued. I will describe them in detail in another chapter.

The snake-man is a design that could have been something produced by geneticists as a blank unit for a wanting soul. They certainly do produce these blanks and I recommend readers research Joanna Iatridou’s video testimony. She may come across as unbalanced; nevertheless her testimony is truthful and correct. Indeed, of all the Ammach contributors, her videos have been wiped from youtube because they are the only ones containing deeply guarded secrets directly relevant to all humans and which counter the Annunaki agenda. [They were back up, last time I checked]. Anyway, I have been shown a number of body types but shall conclude this section with one more description. As a side note, some may be natural and others appear to be geneticists’ creations and there is no easy way of distiguishing which is which. The most bizarre vision I have experienced is of a creature that does not seem to fit any category as it is best described as a bloated frog-like being. The use of the word bloated is not descriptive of an over-sized belly. It overall proportions would be of an extremely tall ordinary human. Nevertheless, the arms and legs are fifty per cent to twice as fat as they should be and remind me of giant frogs limbs. I need to advise I can only see this creature in mono-chrome yet it gives the sense of deep green and a sort of amphibious skin. The head is most unusual as it is almost square and oversized by fifty per cent of what one would expect. In fact, I don’t think I have ever seen anything quite like it. It almost defies description. All the features appear mingled together. There may be eyes, but this is by no means clear. Certainly no nose in conventional sense. I think it is dead, so it may have started decomposing. Perhaps it was burnt as a result of a [space?] vehicle collision. As with many of the other types, it is unclothed. That is all.

They have been mentioned before, so I will now try describing a version of the Alterian Draco type which may be constant with the Imu peoples of a planet of the Tau Ceti solar system.  It is important to also be aware that Australian aboriginal legends describe two types of reptilian biped. One is virtuous and a bringer of wisdom for man. The other is intent on conquest with the objective of vanquishing man. Both look similar. This is confirmed by legends of the Native American tribes, such as the Apaches. In some cases, an Alterian head represents the top spot on the totem; such is the honour and respect of their wisdom. Ignorant modern mainstream historians call these “alligators” or “crocodiles”. Clearly they do not regularly wander the Earth today, although a few have been photographed or filmed (never with unmistakable clarity or, if so, never offered publically). The one I saw was clear and unmistakable. It was wearing a single piece flying suit of a brown similar to the colour of a British officer’s uniform in the First World War. Though I could not see below the ankles, it might have been wearing tight leather boots of the military type (even though this is out of character for webbed, clawed feet). If it had a tail, I cannot fathom how it was able to wear the jump suit. Other than two similarly brown “epaulettes” neatly attached to the centre of each shoulder, there were no adornments. Its body was exactly as one would expect of a trim human military type of five foot seven to eight inches. Nevertheless its oversized head pulled it up to maybe five foot ten. That head was a perfect miniature replica of something Tyrannosaurus Rex might have sported. Its extraordinary grin with all those fine teeth was surreal.

The surreal nature of this experience did not end there. It stood square in front of me, grounded, arms to the side and open, its head scanning from side to side. Did it see me? It gave no indication but I felt an intense fear on the verge of paranoia. Then I realised I did not fear this creature; this being. I was apprehensive of its giant grin and, what appeared to be, razor sharp teeth. The paranoid fear wasn’t mine. Maybe this is a special ability, but I was able to put the dread in a bubble, contained and adrift from my real emotions. Thus I could rationalise. Where had that fear come from; so mysteriously? The only rational answer was the Alterian had the ability of projecting the fear emotion. It is consistent with numerous abductee accounts who, inexplicably, feel at peace with their abductors, which are usually the grey Zeta or Nordic so-called Pleaidian type, but also for “reptilians” (which we now know may not be reptiles) and even the repulsive Phalzants. This is not a version of the Stockholm syndrome where the fear is so acute it turns to love as part of the body’s defence mechanism (i.e. it is hard to attack someone who truly loves you). It is, rather, evidence of the general ability to project emotions with or without technological aids, as the case may be. Concerning higher technologies, other than the holographic projector and one possible space ship, thus far I have seen nothing I recall. Tomorrow might reveal anything…..

If Government is really, truly for the people why is there charity?

Upon learning of his victory in the November 2013 federal elections, new Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, is quoted to have first stated, “We are open for business”. What did he mean by that? Was he referring to the numerous entrenched problems mostly caused by successive governments since and prior to federalisation in 1902? Or was he the kiddie in a newly inherited candy store?

Look, let’s be fair, this is a really tough subject. There are no easy answers because so many have deliberately obfuscated meaning for, in some cases, noble or, in other cases, rogue agendas. Summaries are polled to islands of information that eternally collect moss. If only these giant stones would roll, perhaps the insane might find some sanctity.

Other posts, other writings, other writers have questioned value. Some have gone so far as to say, “Who sets value?” Of course the perpetual, bland “market forces” is always the answer. Yet, this suffers the same fate as causality and the preferred “problem, reaction, solution” response. Without impetus there was and could not be causality unless the mindless atheist excuse for logic is applied (i.e. planned randomness with universes popping into existence). Just as with existence, value must balance or it is of no value. The first step of intelligent interrogation is money. For simplicity’s sake, let us split money into theoretical dollars and real dollars. Let us suppose, in the spirit of this simplicity, there is only one standard unit of currency, which is the dollar. Someone once equated the land value of the three miles squared Tokyo, Japan’s royal grounds to the land value of London (which occupies six hundred and seven square miles). This was before Japan’s market and currency collapse and I do not wish to dwell on the comparison other than in terms of buying power. The point I am trying to make is, have real or theoretical dollars been generated to enable a potential transaction and did they match at the time of comparison? If London’s land value is now four times the price of Tokyo’s royal grounds what happened to the theoretical or real dollars of old? Remember a transaction has not actually taken place. I am merely speculating on the funding allocation to enable the transaction. Then there is the issue when markets or currencies simply change.  Is the funding allocation provision dynamic?

This is a very serious consideration as, if everything everywhere had funding allocations, would there be sufficient theoretical or real dollars to cover all transactions notwithstanding market forces? While on this line of thinking perhaps we should consider street performers or theatre companies. Could there be an allocation for non-assets? The performer does his or her performance and there is nothing to on sell – no asset. Sure, they can produce a DVD or a tape, but that is a different market. It is not the experience. It is not the real thing. And even if it were, why would a populated DVD be more expensive than a blank? So quintessentially, for non-assets do theoretical or real dollars evaporate off the currency balance sheet? Next article I intend to do a shameless plug of my unfinished book Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons. Let us say I was looking for backers and set a price of four million dollars as the net return to me, how would that be accounted for universally? It is completely new but only sort of tangible. Who would assess its value and add theoretical or real dollars to the universal balance sheet? Of course, I understand the economists are jumping up and down screaming, “It doesn’t work like that”. Markets are driven by market forces which underpin the principles of Capitalism with highest bidder pricing.  Nevertheless the economists can protest as much as they like, because they know I am right and the system is limited by the perception of itself and that is why it was only the invention of stock options and derivatives that stopped a spectacular market collapse. It is through their creation that everyone realises the books are well and truly cooked and that is why every second news (sic) article is prophesising doomsday. Ironically, this is one of the compelling motivators behind globalism and United Nations federalisation.

Governments are not adrift from these market forces. They are, in fact, the creators of them. Governments do have the power to abolish money and commerce but Capitalists (comprising an extreme core vocal Industrialist base) hiss this would mean the collapse of civilisation. However, the Capitalist system is uncivilised as it promotes disorder in its promotion of the market fittest. Joseph P. Farrell is not the only one to suggest it but his book Babylon’s Banksters: The Alchemy of Deep Physics, High Finance and Ancient Religion is one of the most comprehensive analyses. In fact, Farrell goes as far to say commerce (Capitalism) not only preceded government, but actually created the need for government. Therefore, if governments are merely instruments for industrialist masters why do they perpetually deceive to their electorates? Evidence that governments are instruments for industrialist masters can be found in the way they sell policy. However, most compelling are the burgeoning private charity resources which, in typical Capitalist fashion, used to occupy top or second place of the London Stock Exchange as the Custodian of Charities. Connected members of the old boy network were issued large sums of free money to “direct” certain institutional charities. Apparently they had connections (whatever that means) or were jolly nice guys.

The point being is if a government’s prima facie is to serve the people, the emergence of any charity is evidence of a dereliction of that duty. There are an estimated one hundred million global charities. I will say that figure again. There 100,000,000 worldwide charities. That is the state of federal dereliction of duty. When asked who I vote for [in government], that is why my answer is always no one. To do that, I would be a traitor. The worst type of traitor wilfully deceives humanity. When the number of global charities is zero, then I will be compelled to vote but not before. This is not to say I would vote once totalitarianism was in place, but, anyway, if that were the case, voting would not be necessary as those who control would control and those who serve would serve. The idea of slaves and masters is an extension of the, can I call it, conspiracy evoking trading Capitalism and its servile world governments. Christopher Knight and Alan Butler’s work Civilisation One: The World is Not as You Thought it Was puts a case that all modern weights and measures stem from a much broader prehistoric standard. Global monoliths such as Stonehenge and Baalbek satisfy a near perfect global linearity modelled on the sexagesimal or base-60 calculation which approximates the distance light travels from sun to Earth. Even the Earth’s mass conformed to these calculations. Thus others have drawn conclusions that biblical “Gods”, such as the Yahweh (or, more correctly, “Beruzdia” type) and Elohim, were none other than trading extra-terrestrial visitors creating trading platforms on Earth and cultivating or creating human serf slaves. [“Clay” in ancient texts is better translated as “culture”. Christian & Barbara O’Brien “The Genius of The Few” speculate the God’s did not shed but gave blood]

As these Gods have not measurably revealed themselves for millennia, humans have stepped into to their void [as parasites] and parroted their ways, partially due to the numerous different types of hybrid. Initially there was the conflict between and subsequent exploitation of the gold (First World) and silver (Indo-China “Old World”) standards. Although, interestingly, the most ancient (ignoring the copper alloy at least 200,000 year old “Pittsburg Penny”) measure of currency (in human terms) appears to be the Aryan cuts of silver, now only the “abolished” gold standard remains hinting at the inevitable globalisation of commerce and federalisation of world government. The problem this, frankly, evil world government (in its current “sectionalised” form) has is the people are waking up. This has nothing to do with New Age Cosmic Christ [sic] or David Icke’s battle cries against a deafeningly phantom Reptilian conspiracy. It is to do with the fact all governments are covens of crooks. Any investment is for industry which might include feeding the slaves between labour requirements (social security) but certainly stops well short of social enablement of the serf classes. Occasionally a diminutive humanitarian gesture is made to fend off a potential revolt, but the ravine between what could be provided and what is amount to window dressing. The Industrialist masters are that sure things could quickly disintegrate into pandemonium; they have built numerous FEMA concentration camps and are trying to engineer civil war on their terms (Occupy Wall Street and other less public movements). This makes particularly interesting reading. Nevertheless the people, in their unstoppable slumber, refuse to take the bait. There will be interesting times to come as many fringe journalists are noticing a tightening of the noose of the Rosicrucian (Annunaki) “grand vision” of enlightenment.  Oh yes, Hitler’s NAZI ideals were all part of that vision. The attack on the middle classes and non-global enterprise is relentless, but unsuccessful. No sooner than a vacuum is created, a new shanty town springs up in competition. Have they been beaten by their own game?

For those who cling to freedom, there are three major concerns which are being played out as I write. The industrialists are the justice (sic) system. They are the banking system. They are the police and the military. Therefore, by either categorising critics or provocateurs as mentally ill or terrorists their wishes or, rather, dictate will be upheld. Governments have grabbed all the land. For anyone who doesn’t agree with their tyrannous masquerade, there is now nowhere to live free.  Those who camp on public land clear of the ills of industrial society can and will be rounded up, displaced back into industrial society or jailed or “suicided”. Eventually all with be chipped. Freeholders, landlords and tenants are held to ransom by a system that can pounce if the industrialists choose that it is so. If they desire it, it will be. Finally, and possibly most importantly, the modern version of the whip master is the recruiter. Realtors can blacklist tenants ensuring permanent homelessness. Recruiters, more despicably, can blacklist workers ensuring slow starvation. Imagine what will happen to those critics and provocateurs if all employment was filtered through recruiters. I shall cover immigration, the greatest assault on human existence and the forced use the banking system in future articles. Simply, for this entry, identification for work legality has empowered recruiters. Trade without banks would be tedious. Therefore, critics and provocateurs that boycott the system become dysfunctional to the point of inoperability. Only those with significant “cash-ets” can beat the system. The catch22 is a fait accomplis for if any individual had sufficient cash for perpetual survival, he or she must be an industrialist. For those that do not, will supermarkets have the right to permanently ban patrons? What of those who are extricated from the system?

The critics and provocateurs know that Christmas is just a crock of commerce, for who needs a “day” to be good? Tradesmen have not ceased to charge fees to turn up to unfixable engineering or electrical problems. Machines, of course, are built with redundancy, but surely a government for the people would supply a complimentary task force to assess what is fit only for the dumpster and what is not? To be fair, it is hard to be good. Because, as I outlined in Who Sets Value and What Is the Meaning of Love to truly demonstrate love, as opposed to infatuation or duty, you must support those that repulse. So there is place for deeply religious events beyond the crass commercial. In particular, the Christian Christmas is a time of indiscriminate giving to all. Governments should use that as their template if they really want to be for the people.

The deeper question is, under their terms of social disenfranchisement will the needy critics and provocateurs be supported by non-government “charity”? If not, does global federalisation approve genocide?