The Mystery of Planet Earth

I had drafted notes for future blog posts back in February but, once again, my channels have diverted my attention. Keep an eye out for Credentials and Support and Charity sometime in the future. In addition, I promised one follower a post on a new model [world] order, but that is a long way from completion. As other truths are revealed, the onerous nature of this task will become clear as I am not about validating selfish human beings. Part of being who I am attracts would be philosophers for group debates in the flesh. Over the last couple of months I have been invited for coffee and discussion with a committed but ill-informed gathering of would be students. Largely thanks to empirical science the majority, and I mean just about everyone, has no idea what the cosmos is and, more importantly, what it represents. With no comprehension of how things started and were constructed, would be students may as well give up any hope of comprehending existence or any serious studious engagement. There are educational echoes throughout my writings that regularly contradict or defy science for good reason. That is not to say science is always in error, but the interpretations and actions based on data or evidence is. Science has a happy knack of writing the script prior to finding any reason. This is what I call fantasy manipulation. Nevertheless, I am also aware critics of my writings can apply the same slur as, and though truth will always be truth, belief is not necessarily truth. The difference between my revelations and popular science is mine are plausible but quintessentially unprovable. Science conjures implausible truths in its attempt to imagine the macro from micro perspectives. I reveal the macro in terms of the macro perspective and leave micro validations to science.

At the latest coffee discussion, I touched on how planets were formed. Information presented was important enough to create this web post. Just as with what we call “stars”, real planets are fusions of light and dark matter. It would be better to call planets encased stars. Or rather, that would grant a better understanding of the cosmos. If the Earth’s core is molten it is because there is an intense build-up of static matter – white and dark matter fused plasma. Given the extreme forces in the centre zero point, where visual and invisible energies burst into nothing from nowhere, I do not believe a molten core would be possible. That also defeats the purpose of a planet. The “atheist” assumption of randomly produced intelligence is profoundly absurd. Firstly, I must say that I believe planets are designed for internal occupation, but I will explain that later. Light does not have too much to do with this essay, but I think it is important to note that science almost completely does not understand light. Invisible light is beyond dimension so it does not need to travel. When we look at the sun, its light does not take four minutes to reach us. The light is seen instantly. Imagine an earthquake. At the epicentre there is an acute force which is distributed outwards in ripples. However the ripples are only an illusion because the event took place at the epicentre. In other frequencies, dimensions the illusory effect might be quite different, but the event would be the same. The light we see works that way because we work that way. Sight is an illusion determined by the way we rationalise our programming. This means that travel at one trillion to the power trillion of what we call the speed of light would be possible, although that would be completely unnecessary. An entity with that ability would merely bypass dimensions and visit nowhere. As explained in past articles, there is no space and single zero point has been replicated almost infinitely to create everything. The followers of super string theory are much closer to the truth than they might imagine.

Time for a recap before I return to the creation of planets, as some readers will struggle with this. What we call infinity is somewhere. Somewhere is nothing. That which is not somewhere can only be nowhere. Nowhere is something. How can a scientist deal with that? In order to comprehend truth, the student must first understand science validates the illusory nature of perception. It brazenly states our frequency band and perception is the correct one. Everything else either does not exist, matter or must conform to our rules (which are fantasies based on opinions backed by perception – assuming error or manipulation has not featured). Fortunately, I can explain how planets are formed in relatively scientific terms, but processes are far stranger than anyone would wish to acknowledge. It appears, for instance, that planets are not the freak of nature favoured by modern atheist cosmologists. They are designed and built. I will attempt to explain how they are built, but the explanation will be too much for some readers. It will seem like a fairy tale or, maybe, an ancient fable. In earlier posts, I covered how stars are formed. I explained about the infinite network of zero point vents, which are eerily mapped to all the atomic nuclei points in our bodies, but that is a separate discussion. From these billions of zero point vents bursts forth light (invisible and visible) which eventually becomes corrupted by darkness (matter). In its normal course a star will eventually become completely clogged manufacturing the phenomenon we call a black hole. Planets appear to be the solution. Dark forces or evil are the very same building blocks used for carbon based life forms and the components that make up their reality. Anything that contradicted old white light order is also branded evil. The Elohim are the simple manifestation of white light, but by modern standards would be far from good as we are a fusion of white and dark light energy.

It is unclear whether planets were initially a solution or a happy accident. They were a product of cooperation. Another way of looking at the process we call stars is a contest between white and dark light. I may have taken a big jump in explanations by glibly issuing the new term dark light. Our subconscious is powered by dark light and the prospective DNA shift will probably move us to the dark light realm. To those in the realm, dark light looks like light (white) light and is the energy that charges sub particle dark matter. In our density, this light looks something like a throbbing blackness. That is the way we perceive it, but it is just as light as white light given the right perception. So, the first great surprise is our planet surface existence is unnatural. Even though there is evidence of surface occupation of Mars and the surface activity on our moon (Mesiats is the old Aryan name) is censored by NASA, the surface of a planet is naturally hostile. Nevertheless, our planet is one of about fifty (in this holographic universe) that have surface atmosphere conditions formed over considerable extended periods (perhaps the billions of years science attests) to propel diverse life systems. All planets support internal life. However, forms and systems will regularly defy or confuse science which bases its assessment on the short sighted analysis of its own perception of Earth systems that self-satisfy. It is likely that most, in not all, planets were built and not arbitrarily formed in the way science might argue (even if it could present the truth). My analogy is the termite mounds in Africa which are giant air conditioning units. Giant Zeta (of the ant genus) energy fields have been filmed, and it is likely these influenced the physical production of this planet. They ensured the raw mix constructed in the way African termites ensure they have air conditioned dwellings. It is an unpleasant notion that “God” in pure visual form might be a creepy crawly. Hold that thought as proper evaluation of DNA might equally define humans as giant cockroaches. If the Earth was repopulated (at stepped intervals) with YHWH’s (Beruzdia) genetic stock, cockroaches undoubtedly are relatives (energetically).

Those in the power generation business know power can go two ways temperature wise. At one extreme is heat and the other is cold. That is why internally air conditioned planets have poles plasma (molten) and ice. The deeper question as to whether our planet did too prior to the disaster 13,800BC (I have changed the earlier published figure 17,800BC as this was the century the Draco reaked havoc in Africa, although much was under water at this time. With many dates in my head and no reference points I will occasionally make errors) when the Aryans of Atlantis smashed the ice moon of Falla and its residue created our Arctic Circle remains a mystery. The Iceland geysers are a glimmer of an ancient volcanic past. The event put great turmoil on life systems (perhaps wiping out humanity with a total planet tidal wave in 10,400BC when the Earth’s crust detached from the core briefly but disastrously) and the southern hemisphere geysers (New Zealand) are an anomaly perhaps manufactured by the Drakkon or Ba’al in an attempt to balance the planet. Or is Earth something unique? To add to the anomaly ancient maps suggest there was no ice in Antarctica prior to 8,000BC which fits in with the 10,400BC disaster and its catastrophic effect on the Earth’s geo-magnetic fields. Soothsayers have revealed (or, rather, laid claim) the Draco twisted the new human’s top vertebrae 23.4 degrees in revenge for the 13,800BC (changed date from original published figure) event which tilted the Earth’s axis [although the vengence appeared to be directed due to the 10,400BC catastrophy. The new human was not engineered until after this event possibly prior to the last exodus to repopulate Earth circa 8,000BC. The modern Semites may be direct relatives of the new Human]. However it is unclear whether there was an ice pole prior to this event. We know that half a moon of ice rock was dumped on the volcanic North Pole and this flattened the cultural & technological heartland of the infamous Atlantis continent. Although it is odd the sixty kilometres wide circular entrance to the inner Earth is evident in NASA photos that have not been doctored was not blocked. To me this suggests that Falla fractured into billions of fragments and that is why mammoths and other prehistoric creatures were snap frozen. If it had come down in a block, everything would have been pulverised and I do not think the Earth would have survived. Nevertheless, the sheer weight of the deluge at the epicentre was enough to end the great Atlantis civilisation. With technologies and culture removed, man reverted to savagery.

With the demise of the dinosaurs, the reason the Earth so quickly repopulated was not a credit to Darwin’s evolution. It was, in fact, due to fully formed life systems in this planet. When the dust settled, investigative inner mammals simply found sanctity in the remnants of lush vegetation on the surface. Apache Indian myths talk of inner Earth man conquering the Draco (or dinosaurs?) to occupy the planet surface forcing the reptiles to the inner realms. Dinosaurs only existed because the Earth had a super climate in its position to and relationship with the sun prior to planet Maldek’s destruction seventy eight million years ago. Did the Earth have ice and volcanic Polar Regions then? Science is unlikely to provide the answers. Maybe our planet has been too battered over the ages for enough credible evidence to remain intact, deflect pillage and to be so undeniably obvious that science cannot concoct its ubiquitous fantasies. Short of our other world visitors who can travel through volcanic plasma, create holographic force fields that look and feel like rock, materialise and dematerialise at will; short of accessing their magic orbs, we will never know. Readers can rest assured, either way, our little planet is a mystery; a mystery that will likely persist.


Positive slaughter

I must admit it has been a hellish two weeks. Circumstances forced an accommodation move which coincided with a sharp increase in work duties. The net result was, web-wise, little to nothing happened. This little site is an infant, so raising its profile should be a full time job. However, today I remembered I did promise a regular blog visitor a post on animal slaughter. Of course, my posts are never simple and this subject covers so many elements. Are not human wars exercises of positive slaughter? Our peers and their salesmen tell us that wars are conducted to preserve the virtues of humanity. Yet, why are those responsible for the instrumentation so lacking in virtue? We invariably learn, in round about ways, that wars are merely manipulation of fodder for the singular and selfish purposes of those that control.

For animals, the pity is sparse. Some do chose to pay extra for free range eggs as they prefer their chickens crammed in a field in place of cage prisons. But whether it is cages, barns or fields, the story is the same; yield is based on chickens per square inch – pack ‘em in and pump ‘em out. Information as to how veal is “produced” would turn many stomachs. I can go on. Nevertheless there are two simultaneous issues to explore here. The first is the [mass] production of meats and the other is the “murder” issue. Of course the Hebrews will say that their word for murder does not apply to slaughter. Their holy Torah presents a series of instructions as to what is right and what is wrong. It does legitimise a number of sacrificial kills, of which many are celebrated in the Old Testament books Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Yet, if the flesh of the beast was not to be consumed would that not defy its Creator as an act of purposeless destruction? If the life force was not meant to operate beyond a point, only an inept or flawed creator would require undefined assistance of man. Yes Hebrews, this is an arbitrary point, but you made it so. It is your big mouths that impose will on the Creator. He, the Great One, remains silent; deathly silent.

Taking the concept of sacrifice, it is a small step to validate routine slaughter of soldiers doing their duty and “accidental” civilian collateral damage. Ah yes, dutiful civilian slaughtered by those claiming they are preserving their homeland. For those that like the idea of Peter at the gates of heaven, “I was killed by my country for my country”. Moving away from war and considering the animal theme, so-called cattle abductions are not the work of humans. Proponents for war are welcome to say that at least we slaughter humanely. This is a moot point, but certainly the cattle (and occasional human) mutilations are quite bizarre (by human standards of normalcy). Few would know that over one hundred thousand mutilations have been recorded over a hundred years and individuals appear to have been selected for certain traits. Per American folk law, beings meeting the descriptive criteria of the “Saurians” were witnessed by two hundred unrelated individuals in Varginha, Brazil in 1996. The turmoil included mysterious “unknown causes” human and zoo animal deaths as well as twenty four stray cats and dogs found with eyes and genitalia “surgically” removed for unknown reasons. This corresponds with descriptions and photographs of some cattle mutilations, except at least two have been found alive in some kind of energy field.  My original theory was they (unknown or extra-terrestrials) were building new [living] robot-bodies. This explained the need for stasis. However, it is known that the Draco (reptilians) consume blood or blood gorged organs of live prey. It is claimed they have some way of devouring or assimilating the life force as well as the flesh. Ironically the modern Vietnamese practice of eating the still beating heart of snakes may be payback for atrocities against humans administered by Draco “priests” thousands of years ago.

Nevertheless this does not solve our riddle; can slaughter be positive or “Godly”? To truly understand the riddle we must first consider fauna. I devote an entire chapter of my unpublished tome, A Brief History of Human Conscience, to the bitter question; do plants want to die? As I explain, just because they do not howl, does not mean they are all for ending up in a hearty soup.  The vegans may sip their broth in confidence, but those that visit this page will question that unchallenged validation. There are some very old plants on this planet. One that springs to mind is the carnivorous Venus flytrap. Off world, there are accounts of walking trees and my channelled sources intimate flying fauna that behave like animals on one planet beyond our solar system. Scientific experiments have demonstrated that love can improve growth in plants. One found greenhouse tomatoes grow particularly well to classical music. Another allegedly saw fauna succumb to angry threats of bodily harm against them. This, unfortunately, is the most plausible direct evidence to supporting the notion that plants like to live (as opposed to harvest death). There is overwhelming provable evidence to support poorly treated (unloved) plants die for unexplained reasons. When compared to the exaggerated health of some carefully loved vegetables, it is only possible to conclude that fauna somehow tunes in to emotions.

How many failed scientists, floundering after explosive new evidence comes to light, claim inconvenient truths are easily explained? The Venus flytrap is a staple for the evolutionists. However it poses uncomfortable questions for the vegans. As a side note, evolution is one of the blinkered sciences. There is no formal reason why the strongest genes will improve the genetic line generation by generation without a guardian. According to probability, each generation would be a random product of the range from most to least able and back again. I have always maintained that genetic change is managed by the sun through its electromagnetic field and genes can click forward at the individual or group levels. That would explain why the fittest appear to progress, but I digress. Taking away Darwin’s big hitters, the vegan might argue that the Venus flytrap is, in fact, a freak of nature. Though this position is similar to the failed scientists’ easily explained; let’s run with it. The freak of nature theory proposes that either the object is unnatural because it inconveniently contradicts science opinion or, more often, in error. In the case of the Venus fly trap, the design – though stunning, “clearly was not intended to catch insects” because “plants don’t do that”. So there it is. Venus flytrap is a freak of nature. Next time God comes up with something like that he’d better jolly well consult His boss, man or there will be hell to pay.

Positive slaughter is only positive when everyone is in agreement. If there is one dissenting voice, just one, it is no longer positive. Then it is mostly positive. Other than, mostly, plants are no direct attack threat and are not carnivorous; the compelling argument for vegetarianism is plants do not scream so they must be okay with dying. An extension of this logic dictates plants are wilfully supportive of vegetable eaters. Agreed, this is partially validated by pollination and seed distribution systems – eat me and fertilise my new born. I have already touched on the truth in other posts. Though most sciences do not explore the fact, bodies are made up of multiple energy fields. Pane Andov proposes that [all] human beings have sixty four energy bodies operating simultaneously in each dimension. He asserts our physical existence is only when the relevant energy field is switched on. Due to limitations of DNA (3% efficiency), at this frequency we have no way of comprehending our extra body experiences. Though Pane is wrong, he is not entirely wrong. There are a limited number of dimensions; of which our third dimension may be a phase, rather than an actual dimension. At the highest identifiable level manifests something called “cubed light”. In essence this is an infusion of multiple light entities forming a common brain. However, our bodies are certainly three in one. We are physical, shadow and light. This shared governance poses some interesting scenarios. In my previous post I pointed out that a good percentage of human beings have [compatible] Draco [reptilian] energy bodies via the manipulation of the energy fields that identify DNA.

We now have to seriously consider something alien to science. In doing so, we must ignore our fraudulent account of history. Human development goes back to the dawn of time and in many ways we have depreciated. Compare us to other animals, with our 3% DNA switched on. Imagine what 100% DNA activation would produce. I am just putting things in perspective. Let us now consider an alternative historic development – the real one, where our DNA started at 100%, but was watered down deliberately for reasons known. Let us suppose the reason for the false matrix and manipulation of the electromagnetic field to inhibit DNA is also known. An explanation requires a separate post, but for explanation of positive slaughter, we merely need to consider Lucifer’s experiment. Lucifer’s real name is unpronounceable and we see only a trivial nickname in its place. As far as rumours branding him the root of all evil, well they solve a big piece of the puzzle. Let us call that exhibit A. Why is Lucifer branded the root of all evil? It is not the explanation those cheesy Hammer Horror movies present with little pointy horned imps causing mischief. Quite the reverse! Lucifer was simply responsible for the creation of the new order we glibly term the survival of the fittest. Prior to the creation of the new order it would have been unthinkable to eat the flesh or even use any animal product. However do you know how many humans have been killed by the hand of other humans prior to the creation of Luciferian order? There have been more than seven trillion murderous deaths by the hand of man. Should cockroaches be exterminated for daring to exist? Is man attacking the design or the designer?

In fact old order had no problem with positive slaughter or collateral damage. This is why Lucifer decided the best way forward for beings consumed with hatred was to legitimise murder by validating the consumption of animals to survive – pigs included; although channelled sources claim the pig is a human relative in some way – as hard as that sounds to believe. I still take everything with bacon! To simplify this conclusion, according to old order plants were consigned for consumption (by God). This is some way validated by the opening up of the senses and, in cases of spiritually advanced individuals, remote or astral travel. It is via the consumption of alkaloids that inter-dimensional travel is theoretically possible although it is debatable whether the carbon body could stand the journey. It is likely that the next dramatic and instantaneous shift for humanity will be to silica atoms. Nevertheless consideration of this must also allow for considerable lifespans and a catalytic change in how time is experience. The current 10-20% of lifespan devoted to eating might be reduced to less than 0.1%. What to do with all that extra time?