I had drafted notes for future blog posts back in February but, once again, my channels have diverted my attention. Keep an eye out for Credentials and Support and Charity sometime in the future. In addition, I promised one follower a post on a new model [world] order, but that is a long way from completion. As other truths are revealed, the onerous nature of this task will become clear as I am not about validating selfish human beings. Part of being who I am attracts would be philosophers for group debates in the flesh. Over the last couple of months I have been invited for coffee and discussion with a committed but ill-informed gathering of would be students. Largely thanks to empirical science the majority, and I mean just about everyone, has no idea what the cosmos is and, more importantly, what it represents. With no comprehension of how things started and were constructed, would be students may as well give up any hope of comprehending existence or any serious studious engagement. There are educational echoes throughout my writings that regularly contradict or defy science for good reason. That is not to say science is always in error, but the interpretations and actions based on data or evidence is. Science has a happy knack of writing the script prior to finding any reason. This is what I call fantasy manipulation. Nevertheless, I am also aware critics of my writings can apply the same slur as, and though truth will always be truth, belief is not necessarily truth. The difference between my revelations and popular science is mine are plausible but quintessentially unprovable. Science conjures implausible truths in its attempt to imagine the macro from micro perspectives. I reveal the macro in terms of the macro perspective and leave micro validations to science.
At the latest coffee discussion, I touched on how planets were formed. Information presented was important enough to create this web post. Just as with what we call “stars”, real planets are fusions of light and dark matter. It would be better to call planets encased stars. Or rather, that would grant a better understanding of the cosmos. If the Earth’s core is molten it is because there is an intense build-up of static matter – white and dark matter fused plasma. Given the extreme forces in the centre zero point, where visual and invisible energies burst into nothing from nowhere, I do not believe a molten core would be possible. That also defeats the purpose of a planet. The “atheist” assumption of randomly produced intelligence is profoundly absurd. Firstly, I must say that I believe planets are designed for internal occupation, but I will explain that later. Light does not have too much to do with this essay, but I think it is important to note that science almost completely does not understand light. Invisible light is beyond dimension so it does not need to travel. When we look at the sun, its light does not take four minutes to reach us. The light is seen instantly. Imagine an earthquake. At the epicentre there is an acute force which is distributed outwards in ripples. However the ripples are only an illusion because the event took place at the epicentre. In other frequencies, dimensions the illusory effect might be quite different, but the event would be the same. The light we see works that way because we work that way. Sight is an illusion determined by the way we rationalise our programming. This means that travel at one trillion to the power trillion of what we call the speed of light would be possible, although that would be completely unnecessary. An entity with that ability would merely bypass dimensions and visit nowhere. As explained in past articles, there is no space and single zero point has been replicated almost infinitely to create everything. The followers of super string theory are much closer to the truth than they might imagine.
Time for a recap before I return to the creation of planets, as some readers will struggle with this. What we call infinity is somewhere. Somewhere is nothing. That which is not somewhere can only be nowhere. Nowhere is something. How can a scientist deal with that? In order to comprehend truth, the student must first understand science validates the illusory nature of perception. It brazenly states our frequency band and perception is the correct one. Everything else either does not exist, matter or must conform to our rules (which are fantasies based on opinions backed by perception – assuming error or manipulation has not featured). Fortunately, I can explain how planets are formed in relatively scientific terms, but processes are far stranger than anyone would wish to acknowledge. It appears, for instance, that planets are not the freak of nature favoured by modern atheist cosmologists. They are designed and built. I will attempt to explain how they are built, but the explanation will be too much for some readers. It will seem like a fairy tale or, maybe, an ancient fable. In earlier posts, I covered how stars are formed. I explained about the infinite network of zero point vents, which are eerily mapped to all the atomic nuclei points in our bodies, but that is a separate discussion. From these billions of zero point vents bursts forth light (invisible and visible) which eventually becomes corrupted by darkness (matter). In its normal course a star will eventually become completely clogged manufacturing the phenomenon we call a black hole. Planets appear to be the solution. Dark forces or evil are the very same building blocks used for carbon based life forms and the components that make up their reality. Anything that contradicted old white light order is also branded evil. The Elohim are the simple manifestation of white light, but by modern standards would be far from good as we are a fusion of white and dark light energy.
It is unclear whether planets were initially a solution or a happy accident. They were a product of cooperation. Another way of looking at the process we call stars is a contest between white and dark light. I may have taken a big jump in explanations by glibly issuing the new term dark light. Our subconscious is powered by dark light and the prospective DNA shift will probably move us to the dark light realm. To those in the realm, dark light looks like light (white) light and is the energy that charges sub particle dark matter. In our density, this light looks something like a throbbing blackness. That is the way we perceive it, but it is just as light as white light given the right perception. So, the first great surprise is our planet surface existence is unnatural. Even though there is evidence of surface occupation of Mars and the surface activity on our moon (Mesiats is the old Aryan name) is censored by NASA, the surface of a planet is naturally hostile. Nevertheless, our planet is one of about fifty (in this holographic universe) that have surface atmosphere conditions formed over considerable extended periods (perhaps the billions of years science attests) to propel diverse life systems. All planets support internal life. However, forms and systems will regularly defy or confuse science which bases its assessment on the short sighted analysis of its own perception of Earth systems that self-satisfy. It is likely that most, in not all, planets were built and not arbitrarily formed in the way science might argue (even if it could present the truth). My analogy is the termite mounds in Africa which are giant air conditioning units. Giant Zeta (of the ant genus) energy fields have been filmed, and it is likely these influenced the physical production of this planet. They ensured the raw mix constructed in the way African termites ensure they have air conditioned dwellings. It is an unpleasant notion that “God” in pure visual form might be a creepy crawly. Hold that thought as proper evaluation of DNA might equally define humans as giant cockroaches. If the Earth was repopulated (at stepped intervals) with YHWH’s (Beruzdia) genetic stock, cockroaches undoubtedly are relatives (energetically).
Those in the power generation business know power can go two ways temperature wise. At one extreme is heat and the other is cold. That is why internally air conditioned planets have poles plasma (molten) and ice. The deeper question as to whether our planet did too prior to the disaster 13,800BC (I have changed the earlier published figure 17,800BC as this was the century the Draco reaked havoc in Africa, although much was under water at this time. With many dates in my head and no reference points I will occasionally make errors) when the Aryans of Atlantis smashed the ice moon of Falla and its residue created our Arctic Circle remains a mystery. The Iceland geysers are a glimmer of an ancient volcanic past. The event put great turmoil on life systems (perhaps wiping out humanity with a total planet tidal wave in 10,400BC when the Earth’s crust detached from the core briefly but disastrously) and the southern hemisphere geysers (New Zealand) are an anomaly perhaps manufactured by the Drakkon or Ba’al in an attempt to balance the planet. Or is Earth something unique? To add to the anomaly ancient maps suggest there was no ice in Antarctica prior to 8,000BC which fits in with the 10,400BC disaster and its catastrophic effect on the Earth’s geo-magnetic fields. Soothsayers have revealed (or, rather, laid claim) the Draco twisted the new human’s top vertebrae 23.4 degrees in revenge for the 13,800BC (changed date from original published figure) event which tilted the Earth’s axis [although the vengence appeared to be directed due to the 10,400BC catastrophy. The new human was not engineered until after this event possibly prior to the last exodus to repopulate Earth circa 8,000BC. The modern Semites may be direct relatives of the new Human]. However it is unclear whether there was an ice pole prior to this event. We know that half a moon of ice rock was dumped on the volcanic North Pole and this flattened the cultural & technological heartland of the infamous Atlantis continent. Although it is odd the sixty kilometres wide circular entrance to the inner Earth is evident in NASA photos that have not been doctored was not blocked. To me this suggests that Falla fractured into billions of fragments and that is why mammoths and other prehistoric creatures were snap frozen. If it had come down in a block, everything would have been pulverised and I do not think the Earth would have survived. Nevertheless, the sheer weight of the deluge at the epicentre was enough to end the great Atlantis civilisation. With technologies and culture removed, man reverted to savagery.
With the demise of the dinosaurs, the reason the Earth so quickly repopulated was not a credit to Darwin’s evolution. It was, in fact, due to fully formed life systems in this planet. When the dust settled, investigative inner mammals simply found sanctity in the remnants of lush vegetation on the surface. Apache Indian myths talk of inner Earth man conquering the Draco (or dinosaurs?) to occupy the planet surface forcing the reptiles to the inner realms. Dinosaurs only existed because the Earth had a super climate in its position to and relationship with the sun prior to planet Maldek’s destruction seventy eight million years ago. Did the Earth have ice and volcanic Polar Regions then? Science is unlikely to provide the answers. Maybe our planet has been too battered over the ages for enough credible evidence to remain intact, deflect pillage and to be so undeniably obvious that science cannot concoct its ubiquitous fantasies. Short of our other world visitors who can travel through volcanic plasma, create holographic force fields that look and feel like rock, materialise and dematerialise at will; short of accessing their magic orbs, we will never know. Readers can rest assured, either way, our little planet is a mystery; a mystery that will likely persist.
ozziethinker 