In my humble opinion, this is both my most controversial, longest and arguably the best post to date. The faint of heart are advised not to read on.
Various religions and their fundamentalist congregations assert sex is sin. If sex is not sin, why is the very mention of sex taboo? Sure media standards have changed and the censors have relaxed their control over adult movies, i.e. cinema or television standards and not porn. Porn, in its new age of light, has become rather jaded and lacks the style of the black and white stag films. If there is anything blue about modern porn it is nothing elicit. Even at the extreme end of the spectrum catering for tastes such as mutilation, “coprophilia” and bestiality which, though banned in parts of the world, makes its way everywhere courtesy of peer networks; even these productions have become formularised. If it’s legal, corporate can do it and if not, external agents will be requisitioned given a big enough purse or a zealous enough following. The current pinnacle of illegality is the production of child porn. After one senior British policeman stated on record, “….child sex is worse than murder” in a reaction to the witch hunt against rocker Garry Glitter and his sensational trial by media. The irrationality of this subject has become my greatest obsession. I shall explore more on this later.
Earlier this week, I had a three hour lunch meeting with the President of a Sydney based Exo-politic Society. Amongst a great many discussion topics, time was devoted to Hitler and the so-called “holocaust”. I said that Hitler has been misrepresented, the plight of the Jews has been overstated to their own detriment but, most importantly, attitudes have not changed. It would be fair to say my position caught her off guard which resulted in a reactionary political response. The reality boils down to the fact that if Hitler was the “world’s worst evil”, everyone else was also the world’s worst evil. It does not take one to make society; it takes society to be society and an active minority to corrupt. It is well known that 5% will lead, 90% will follow and the remaining 5% will buck the system. This is when society is functional. If society becomes dysfunctional a different strata of statistics are present. Then society is neatly but not necessarily equally split into those who protect and those who raid the infrastructure. The problem with Hitler was not just the attitude of the German peoples; it follows the attitude of the British, American, Italian, Japanese and other parts of the global mix. People are plagiarists. If there is an opportunity for influence, fashions notwithstanding, then influence will infect. It became abundantly clear that the British and German soldiers of war had precisely the same values. They had different ways of expressing them, but their values were the same nonetheless. Chunks of the British aristocracy publically admired Hitler’s “strength” in the 1930’s, before he was reinvented as the “world’s worst evil”, but after the controversial Mein Kampf as it was penned 1923-1924. The reasons its critics describe it as a poorly written document are twofold. There is a concentration of patriotic sentiment which might overwhelm the reader. However, more importantly, Hitler’s attack on the Jews is a subtle one. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are as quiet about Hitler’s dislike of the cosmopolitan Diaspora as they are about the numerous and obvious abuses of Holocaust “compensation” (sic).
Some are confused into thinking he was a goyim, but Hitler’s father, Alois, was fully Jewish being the illegitimate offspring of an unnamed member of the Frankenberger family of Graz (possibly of Rothschild bloodline – visiting?) and their sewing-maid, Maria Schickelgruber (who has been attributed as a “Jewish chorus girl”). At age 30 Alois inexplicably formally changes his name from Heidler (the surname of his step father) to Hitler. Hitler means shepherd. Few are aware Adolph means wolf. It is surely more than prophetic he is a wolf in shepherd’s cloths? Klara Hitler (Adolph’s mother) was a step relative from the Heidler bloodline and is presumed to be of Slavic Aryan stock. So, when undeniably Jewish Hitler wrote Mein Kampf the book did not morph into its current manifesto of evil status until long after the supposed demise of the NAZI machine. The primary reason Mein Kampf is branded a poorly written work is to firstly dissuade any readership and secondly to fend off any potential [“insane”] champions. The NAZI machine has done very well for itself in the philosophy of government. Just about all of Hitler’s “crazy laws” have been adopted globally or, certainly, in the first world. Those who have studied Hitler in detail will know of his association with the Thule movement and its connection to Helena Blavatsky, creator of the Theosophical society. Blavatsky disciple, Alice Bailey wrote the philology behind the ethics of the United Nations charter. The concentration camp was invented as a method of containment in the second Anglo Boer War. At the turn of last century “officially” 27,927 civilians died in captivity. This compared with around 12,000 military combat deaths. A further 18,300 military officially died from disease. Unofficial statistics places the civilian deaths in these concentration camps at over 100,000. The deeper question is, does the Holocaust myth (whether true or false) obscure the real problem. If so, why?
On 14th May 1948 David Ben-Gurion announced, in his capacity as Executive Head of the World Zionist Organisation, “the establishment of a Jewish State in Eretz Israel, to be known as the State of Israel”. The main reason Ben-Gurion was able to announce this is, due to the ‘beyond compensation’ loss of six million Jews, Israel Statehood was a small token of support by globalist backers. They decided six million had perished as evidence for their judged “beyond compensation” loss because the figure had been prophetically announced via a Washington Post bulletin back in 1919. Aided by some pointless, but wizened, propaganda by Eisenhower, the small token was delivered. No small token was given to the Palestinian Arabs or ethnic Slavs who so admirably supported the Allied campaign and suffered greatly as a consequence. Indeed new Israel troops were at war with Palestinian Arabs on 15th May 1948 over the prized small token the day after the announcement of Israeli Statehood. Officially, displaced Palestinians had made an act of aggression against Israel as they were expected to “piss off” without compensation, fully displaced. Israel’s ethics and position on human rights was made absolutely clear in its handling of the Gaza Flotilla contingency for human rights. Their deadly spiteful and vicious attack on conscientious human beings using their most elite troops has shown who they are. Their “psy-ops” has failed. Boo-hoo Netanyahu and Peres, your cat is out of the bag.
Shimon, you are beyond hope. Those injections to extend your life won’t save you from the inevitable. Bibi, I know those rumours about your psychiatrist that had been helping you resolve your Oedipus complex are true. Have you learned that Nero-esque activities involving the hi-jack of your psychiatrist’s house, enslavement or banishment of its occupants is an attack on fundamental human rights? When that happens, more than once, Bibi, people just end their own lives. Both of you, Shimon and Bibi, need to research Dannion Brinkley and God help you. I digress. To answer the question, why is the ADL so protective of the Holocaust myth [in part propagated via Eisenhower propaganda]? The reason is twofold. As the poor little Jewie two shoes have furtive imaginations they needed something really big, really dreadful to justify the 1919 Washington Post six million figure. That was the cake and the Holocaust was the cherry on top. As the same Jewish bankers who funded and made so much out of the Second World War have no intention of scrapping the concentration camp, that is the second reason. There is some up-to-date evidence. These are the FEMA camps springing up all over the world and constructed for humanitarian purposes by ruthless tyrants. Their “humanitarian purposes” do not take too much second guessing.
I did visit Anne Frank’s house in Amsterdam some years ago. I advise everyone visit and shed a real tear for her; Jew, Goyim but, most importantly the Diaspora. The truth that 10,000’s German prisoners of war were killed in Allied concentration camps after being treated without compassion in sub-human conditions is gradually creeping out now – thank goodness, lest we forget. This tyranny did not stop at the cosmopolitan Jews – the good guys who tried to connect with their fellow man. It targeted anyone outside the “club”. Also, if I was a little close to the bone with my ambivalence on the Holocaust (sic) and some Zionist commissioned Austrian thugs are instructed to forcefully abduct me to face a “truth” trial in Austria just as they did with Ernst Zundel – twice, my mouth will affirm your monstrous lies to save sin, but my heart will remain pure. That you can never alter. The inquisition is always near by. Except in times of bitter war, methods have become rather more dignified. These days, as Jon Rappaport is recognising, they are more inclined to define truth martyrs as insane, pump ‘em full of drugs or lobotomise them. Maybe that’s the same thing. It is interesting Ernst Zundel used to be given an inaccurate and information lacking write-up in Wikipedia (Maybe he still is. I would waste a second referring to their guff in confirmation). He was described as having composed a “poorly written” [hmm, where have we heard that before?] book attacking the [obviously true, cross my heart, yah-de-yah] Holocaust. They neglected to give any details on the book he published, which was written by Richard E. Harwood [nom-de-plume of Richard Verrall, politician]. Jeff Rense gave “Did Six Million Really Die?” (updated 2011) sterling publicity for his reprint of the work after serving seven years in prison for expressing well argued, researched and fundamentally compelling history which contradicts the wishes and version issued by of the State of Israel. Before you read Did Six Million Really Die, I suggest “Under the Sign of the Scorpion” (2002) by Juri Lina will give you extra vital background.
That’s pretty depressing. Enough about perversion and let us return to porn. If was a professor of psychology, I would welcome any poorly written thesis on the infinitely complex relationships governed by cam girls and their prospects. Male and female students presented with the odious task of two or three years research cataloguing the emotions generated at the expense of online chat [legal advises adult links are not permitted at wordpress]. My own several years devoted to this colossus, at enormous sacrifice, has accumulated enough material for a full three PHD’s. I might add that any spare moment is religiously applied to the sex chat phenomenon. It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s gotta do it. On a more serious note, it is still very hard [Note: ahem spotted cheap pun on edit] to discuss serious research of pornographic materials as anything more than back door perversion (Note: the puns are flowing). Nevertheless, I have studied porn and find most of it terribly, tediously boring. In many cases scenarios struggle to raise a smile and certainly would not stir any passion. Movie makers imagined exploding rockets only to inspire wilting libidos. As it beyond access and, surely, mustn’t exist as such, child porn seems very exciting by the very token it is forbidden. Unlike Adam and Eve’s conquest in the garden of paradise, child porn is an unknown quantity. It does not exist as it forbidden rather than being available but off limits. Although, it is baffling that news reporters quixotically state “paedophiles accessed child porn websites” from time to time. Where are these child porn websites and how had these valiant news reporters managed to check them out?
You see here is the problem. According to the logic behind child porn, all viewers become instantly affected and instantly turn into paedophiles. And these paedophiles that they turn into – instantly, are no ordinary ones. They are deranged [Note watch any Day of the Dead movies]. They need to be stopped immediately before they commit an instant terrorist attack against – children. Now if this is so, how are news reporters, police, judiciary, jurors immune to the affect? Is there an antidote? Do they take a pill? If so, why not make these pills available to the general public in case, innocently, they stumble across some mind-altering child porn? Seriously, apparently if I have some child porn on my computer, in my phone, under the bed or even in my open car port, I have been infected and I am contagious and must be thrown in jail for a lengthy period of time. If someone, for instance, decided to generate an en-masse e-mail blast of child porn materials, boy that would be tricky. According to the techie (you guessed it, Dave) who fixes my computer, once anything reaches your “in-box” your hard drive is infected – like it or not. This is something called the virtual memory – whatever that is. Imagine someone having a bunch of child porn on their hard drive they hadn’t even looked at because they did not know it was there become infected. That’s the power of the stuff.
Here’s an even more troubling scenario. There was, rumoured, a vintage Japanese porn movie starring a very well developed thirteen year old girl who had sexual intercourse in a number of positions with a number of men. Because the censorship laws were different then law enforcement agencies blather something in relation to this movie. That’s what law enforcement agencies do. They blather. So all those guys that cracked a woody and, maybe, the girlfriend was there “helping”; were they paedophiles for “getting off” to a thirteen year old girl (who looked “adult”)? Conversely, in the days of internet experimentation, when news groups were popular, an erotic picture of a ten year old girl found its way into some of the “decent” groups and not the “pedo” ones. It was very artistic in black and white and she was sweetly looking up as if she was about to suck a giant, well….use the imagination! After two lawyers committed suicide, it was revealed she was actually a twenty three year old amateur porn model. Only joking, sadly no lawyers were harmed.
Australia’s an interesting and diverse place. So much so, the Federal Police launched an attack on art in relatively recent times. In an attempt to promote a rebrand of infamous British [may she rot in hell] Mary Whitehouse, they targeted one of the National Archives. Hetty Johnston insisted the locked away large photograph of a topless fourteen year old girl was hardcore pornography of the worst kind. The arguments applied were the same lame effort attributed to the great works of Jock Sturges and David Hamilton. These Law Enforcement folks are not that bright. Neither are their Illuminati media partners in crime, who seem permanently joined at the hip to their police thug accomplices. A double spread of languid sputum vigorously promoted every Johnson sentiment which attacked the artist from dress sense, behaviour to the size of his member and how he used it. However, the primo people’s rag rather more interestingly, engaged its readers with another double page feature a few pages on. It was innocently focusing on road safety. As I mentioned, these guys are not that bright. The theme was the celebration of Grand Final Footie night. Oh Vey. The “husband” of a “regular” Islander family had been killed crossing the road. There is nothing untoward about that, except he was sixteen years old and crossed the road to buy a case of beer. His “wife” was fifteen years old. Then there was the baby. Doing the maths, she was certainly no older than fourteen when she started making the baby. See the irony? Oh Vey. Recently an Australian Council stated:
Did you know that in Australia:
– at least one woman is killed every week by a current or former partner.
– one in three women over the age of 15 reports having experienced physical or sexual violence at some time in their lives.
Oh Vey. If the joke was not sick enough, reputedly two fourteen year old lovers were each convicted of rape of the other by the American judiciary because both refused victim status. There is also the unpublished case of a six year old Russian girl who was first raped by her policeman father and then raped again in four subsequent foster homes. Of course, she must be the victim. Oh Vey.
Suppressed past writings paint a very different picture suggesting sexual children were not common, but very much known. Sincere discussions on this deserve a separate essay. Virginal purity is the greatest virtue in a world where sex is the greatest sin. The supposed sexual revolution of the 1960’s has amounted to nothing. The people are as dumb as ever and mindlessly follow the incessant religious dogma sometimes with tragic family or social consequences. A man called Albert Fish suffered enormous abuse from his Baptist mother in her deranged attempt to stop him masturbating as a young child. Fish was barely spared from a lynch mob execution in the 1930’s who caught up with him after he had killed his forty third young boy by sexual mutilation. Psychiatric evaluation revealed he had saved them from sin.