The Forces Behind Judaism – Part Two

This is a continuation of part one. I touched on Roman Catholic control of Europe and failed to mention that the Zionist merchant bankers loved to fund wars. Nevertheless, to be fair, at this point there were considerable wealth reserves tied up in the Roman States (eventually to become the Vatican) which could be traced back to the black nobility. Therefore the black nobility had much to gain from disrupting the equilibrium managed by the European monarchs as many were, at least partly, supported by or sponsors of black nobility funds. Zionism’s major draw on power coincided with the medieval royal houses which continued right up to the twentieth century (as referenced by Benjamin Disraeli’s poignant comments about [Jewish] orthodoxy marrying into the aristocracy via maternal lineages). Once the royals were broken, no doubt Zion could then target and fell the papacy. That seems to be happening today with mainstream paedophilia hysteria.

The hybrid Zionists, most notably via William the Conqueror, tried to seize Europe. However, in those days, the people roamed free and common law reigned. This meant non-Jewish and, invariably, non-Zionist mini-chieftains reigned precincts. Land had no value and, providing it was not occupied, it was available for the taking. The tales of Robin Hood scope the, then, sense of the right to life. They also carefully omit the history of money. Indeed the Romans failed to convince the British commoners and their rural chieftains of the value of money as, often, they could not give it away. The reason the Robin Hood tales omit the role of money is not just because the concern was the, then, present but they were written as propaganda to underscore the Zionist plebian coup d’état. Under Anglo Saxon Law the Jews (Zionists) became local bankers under a treatise known as the Starra in order to honour Jesus’ perceived distaste for money changers. It began with unsecured transactions that effectively amounted to hire purchase arrangements for social up and comers. Middle classes were encouraged to invest in luxuries beyond their means. Unexpectedly that was followed with massive land grabs on behalf of the state by temporary King John. Of course, this is emphasised in the Robin Hood tales with triumphant King Richard returning from the Zionist “crusades” in revenge for the Moors advances centuries earlier. Historical plausibility behind the peasant rebellion that resulted in Magna Carta charter is woefully lacking. The real amibitions of King Richard became clear after the crusades when he bequeathed great tracts of land to his inner circle. Peasants on these land gifts were stripped of rights and under the royal stamped terms of that thievery, the rightful owners (per common law) now had to pay rent in perpetuity to their new thief landlords. In order to pay rent, they had to work the land and sell produce back to the landlord (that had stolen the land). In effect one tenth of the yield was given to landlord by this arrangement and money was instilled as the denominator at all levels of society. Robin Hood be damned.

Gnostic “King” Jesus’ trusted friend was Joseph of Arimathea. He had a booming tin mining business in Britain. Tin was the new super commodity and the local druid chieftains made excellent business associates. What happened before is a great mystery and one I have not yet deciphered. It is too great a coincidence that Britain was selected and became the new Promised Land. Nevertheless, the Anglo Saxons were of the same stock as their masters – Aryans through and through. They made reluctant slaves and were, overall, poor workers (often due to poor health, rather than rebellion). Moreover, they expected rights. Serfdom backfired and after a few hundred years of little or no progress, the Zionist establishment effectively gave up without ever letting go. They therefore needed to find a new Promised Land. The land they selected was Amerika. It was more than some urban myth. The elite had esoteric documentation which confirmed its existence, land maps included. They merely had to go there. That’s why the freemason, Christopher Columbus, was sent. Some dispute whether he actually found mainland. It is unimportant as he was a puppet for America was known presumably prior to the most ancient records. The reason the Portuguese Columbus in particular was dispatched is Catholicism was intent on conquering the unknown world by discovering it. He also had Jewish “handlers”. The world was governed by two Aryan poles. To the north was Catholicism and Zionism held the south, east and west. For those that are confused by this; Zionism’s unofficial religion is atheism. That means its members can position themselves under any so-called faith they chose; Catholicism included. America’s so-called discovery date 1492 is a significant one. Not only does it mark this official discovery, but it also represents a significant attempt at cooperation between the forces of Zion and the old Babylonia cult.

Some Zionists, surprisingly, were and are also very religious. There were sporadic bouts of plague in Europe from the 1200’s and perhaps prior. These often produced a xenophobic reaction from deeply superstitious peoples wishing to ward off evil. As the Jews have always created insular microcosms parasitically drawing off wider society, they have generally been viewed with suspicion by the majority. 1349 saw 2000 Jews burned by an angry mob in Strausborg after an outbreak of bubonic plague or “black death”. Basel (Switzerland) rounded up and burned 4,500 of theirs. The Mainz communities tried to defend themselves killing 200 of an angry mob. This saw 6,000 of their own incinerated as a result. Members of the orthodoxy also found the Catholic interpretation of the Torah so appealing they were tempted to convert. Popes had even started to issue promissory notes which allowed advance sinning. Due to conflicts in business life, merchants had no option but to sin if they wished to be become successful. When another very bad outbreak of plague and syphilis hit Europe in 1490 an amnesty between the Jews and Catholics in 1492 seemed the only way to avoid eternal damnation on Earth.

The agreement was short lived because it obviously offended Pharisaic order. Indeed it made a mockery of old order. Therefore, Zion’s man, Martin Luther, infamously pinned his list of demands to the Catholic Church door. We know Luther was definitely Zion’s man because his new interpretation of Christianity was so Pharisaic in flavour it would have made St Paul blush. The fresh new name for Pharisaic order is Puritanism and now, by the backdoor out of Europe, a new land called America had been “discovered”. It was not too long before a boat load of pilgrims set off from the old Promised Land, Britain, to establish a new puritan haven. The fusion of Catholicism and Zionism coincided with the creation of a new masonic Christian sect called Calvinism. It is interesting to note that some claim that Barak Obama is Calvinist and not a Muslim (even though he swore into office on the Qur’an) as popularised, at one time, by the mainstream press. Good old Queen Elizabeth I of England (known as the iron queen) was a Zionist through and through, as was her father, Henry VIII. Henry’s claim to fame was to sack the Catholic Church of Rome, plunder its premises replacing them with his own church of atheism (colloquially known as the Church of England). Spiritually did make a comeback under Elizabeth. She imposed hefty punishments for non-attendance of church services in true Pharisaic fashion. The pews were always full in her reign. From about this point on the Churches became the local gazette. Towards the end of her life she blessed the foundation of the Virginia Company, which was a cooperation of merchants. James I, who was James IV of Scotland, heralded a symbolic coming together of a “broken” Britain after being selected as Elizabeth’s successor. James also heralded the introduction of Calvinism. The band of merchants behind the Virginia Company eventually plucked up courage to sail to America. When there, they grabbed the first piece of land they could easily secure and named it Jamestown.

The foul and deceitful pilgrims finally had their puritan haven, but who would do all the menial jobs unfit for a God-like community? Even back in the day of Christopher Columbus, Negro slaves were being introduced to the grand houses of the day. African social structures were such that if a chieftain could be influenced in the right way bond labour would have the blessing of all parties, including the slave. Over time, the African chieftains and local peoples realised they were being exploited and attitudes changed. However, Negro slaves were renowned for making the best workers. Texts that allege Columbus did reach the American mainland also say he captured five hundred native Indians to sell as slaves. Reputedly he was double crossed by his Jewish stakeholders, never receiving a penny and was falsely imprisoned for a while. For anyone feeling the remotest sympathy for Columbus need to be aware of his character as, once again, reputedly he used to play a game with captives. This game involved trussing them up securely with rope so movement was impossible. Feet up they would be dangled from a fall overhead branch. Then his men would take turns to see how fast they could chop through these human “logs” with their axes. Whereas the coming together of Wales and Scotland had been a bloodless affair with the royal engagement of James, Ireland was far from conquered. English colonisation of Ireland had begun in the 1500’s was met with violent resistance from the Earl of Desmond (aided by Rome after the fallout with Henry VIII). Things reached a head in 1640’s when 1000’s of displaced peoples needed to be processed. James II came up with ideal solution. He decreed the declassification of Irish as Aryan slaves and bundled them off to the colonies (America and the West Indies) for sale. While a Negro was regarded as prime stock and would sell for fifty pounds sterling (the price of a mansion house) an Irish would struggle to fetch five pounds. Indeed for some Irish no price tag was attractive. To make the exploitation palatable the term slave has been upgraded to servants now when discussing the plight of the Irish.

The Pilgrim Fathers needed slaves and plenty of them. One of the great ironies is that the Irish slaves originated from precisely the same genetic stock that is the Zionist elite – Khazars, Huns and Mongols. Perhaps it is not so ironic. What better way to protect the true origins of Zionism than fabricating myths of Jewish separatism, when all along the same Atlantis rejects; the derelicts have been driving politics on both sides. Religion is merely a front. However let me press on with this historic saga. History has told us that the Redskins also did not make willing slaves, although many ended up supporting white man’s households. Historically, like the Australian aborigine peoples (who may be the closest to Olmec man); the Redskins welcomed visitors to lands that yielded. It became clear very early on that white man was not there to share. He was proposing a takeover. The advent of a stampede of greedy “pioneers” was designed to engage a clash of cultures. However, the Redskins ultimately lacked the ability to fend off white man, as recklessly brave as individuals may have been. Back in Europe, notably Britain, the old guard kept a beady eye on the America situation, with a muted opinion it would fail. They presumably had privy information as to the reputation of the Redskins as fearsome warriors. However the seventeenth had smoothly flowed into the eighteenth century, on schedule, and there American puritans had settled relatively incident free. Indeed the relationship with the natives was more positive than negative as great tracts of unused land were available. Thus, in light of the early success and potential for fortunes to be made, the British Crown (accompanied by a gaggle of Zionist bankers) decided it needed to stamp its authority on the rogue colonies. In the centre of these politics was an unknown (if you believe that you’ll believe anything), relatively impoverished son of a Jewish German grocer and money changer. “Chance” (sic) placed Mayer Amschel Bauer (Bayer) under the tutelage of Jacob Oppenheimer. Through Royal connections, the fantasy goes on to say he became a dealer of rare coins, but things become foggy in trying to justify the rise to enormous wealth as a financial middle man for the nobility. Bayer changed his name to Rothschild supposedly out of respect of family, which could be traced back to 1577 and, then, a roth (red) schild (shield) represented the family business. This red shield, others have pointed out, was the old Yiddish Zionist solidarity emblem based on a Babylonian lucky charm.

I am not sure if I discussed the Zeta Seal in my last post. If not everything has been covered in my edging-ever-towards-completion book Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons. The Zeta Seal dates back to 1748 when they attempted to halt the genetic ascension of man, or, rather, human. In essence it was very important to them that we were stuck at three strand DNA with broken chromosomes. Amazingly 1748 was a very important year. Firstly (on January 26) Britain, Netherlands, Australia and Sardinia (!) sign the anti-French treaty. Sardinia, by the way, became the ruler of all states and principalities under the formation of Italy in 1863. Germany reverted to joint control from Bavaria and Prussia in 1870. Anyway, more on 1748; March 19 heralded the Naturalization Act granting Jews the right to colonise North American colonies. [Pachter] Riots saw the death of over 200 after Netherlander Marretje Arents was executed for leading a contingent of protesters at the government peat tax. On August 15 1748 a United Lutheran (Zionist) Church of the US was conceived and followed by denomination in Pennsylvania August 26. December 26 France and Austria signed a treaty over southern Netherlands after the French defeat of Maastricht May 7^. In 1749 Britain’s George II (a puppet king for Zion) gives the Ohio Company [the trading rights to, which amounted to land ownership of] Ohio. The stakeholders in the Ohio Company were none other than the dear Washington’s, George not, officially, included. Jefferson and a few other noteworthy names were involved with that investment. Not on theme, but relevant, in 1750 September 5 a decree was issued in Prussia allowing the annual search of Jewish homes for stolen or “doubtful” goods. Oh dear, they were the “fences” that far back? I very much doubt many Sephardim were embroiled.

The whole concept of Capitalism has been driven and exploited by the Zionists. However, with the emergence of the “unknown” Rothschild dynasty a special order for centralised control was created. Many talk about the powers behind the power, surreptitiously known as the “powers that be”. However, the identity of the prime peer group was brazenly labelled for all to see. The name has not changed today and, officially, on 1 May 1776 Adam Weishaupt, a Jesuit and university professor, founded the Illuminati. The name actually means “enlightened ones” and was likely the reinvention of the, prior protectors of Zion, Knights Templar. They, as touched on in part one, had largely brought about their own demise by alienating a number of monarchs, Charles IV of France and Henry V of Britain included, in 1300’s. Today’s Illuminati is a “now you see it, now you don’t” affair with the main visible drive illuminating (brainwashing) the general (ignorant) public with propaganda. Your mainstream news is an example of that propaganda, so if you rely on that fantasy as “basis”, you are an ignorant peasant. This is not to say “events” advertised by news streams do not occur. Propaganda is usual found in voiceovers giving Zionist favoured outcomes to each plot or critical omissions. The landscape had changed and the world had become too big for things to return to middle ages standards, so the Knights Templar casualty would never re-emerge intact.

1776 was another big year and the formation of the Illuminati was as much symbolic as practical. It heralded declaration of Independence of a free America. Free referred to “tax free” so Zionist merchant bankers could operate unshackled from the British Crown. This is important and more on this later. It also marked the end of torture as a means of interrogation in Austria, although this was the fashion in Europe and by the end of the nineteen century it was a common law. 1776 was also a hinge date in Russian affairs, although topically 1772 was a more significant one. Part of Poland was annexed for Jewish peoples by Catherine “the Great” (another Zionist) and she also broke the Khazar/Cossack (perhaps not with Zionist affiliations) republics on the Russian mainland, possibly completely by 1776 or shortly after. That was a turbulent period of Russian history. France had been plunged into revolution after deliberately squandering its assets in the American Revolution. Some argue that the Statue of Liberty is [masonic gesture] evidence the French foreign minister at the time, Pierre Beaumarchais, was a conspirator who set up King Louis XVI, both toppling the monarchy and funding Zion’s new haven, America. Let us never forget the British/Italian Sponsored “anti-French” treaty of 1748. An “unknown” Italian banker’s son eventually progressed to lead the new Republic, only to declare himself Emperor. That betrayer of “new order” was Napoleon, of course. The French “model” was a precurser to Russian “Communism”.

Jim Kirwan is an aggressive writer whose style I do not favour. However, I do confirm he seems to have an encyclopaedic knowledge of the Unites States of America’s legal historic development. Frequently he references controversial laws created to empower the bankers to the disadvantage of the people. However, the rules of the game were about to abruptly change. One can loosely argue the change in standards began with the abolishment of torture for war purposes. However, this is hard to validate. The British Abolishment of Slavery Act 1833 was a certainty. On face value it was a positive step towards great civilised society. In reality it was a Zionist driven commerce ploy. The problem with slavery was not only the slave was bound to an owner, but there was no real incentive for an impressive work rate. Therefore, a bad slave was a huge problem. Punishment demotivated the good workers so much it served a negative purpose. Most slave owners were not inhumane and, in some ways, felt they had a duty of care. Besides, to free slaves due to poor work efficiency might encourage a trend. Good slaves were often very well treated and often incentivised. I say that not to vilify their lack of liberty, but merely to put things in perspective.

A low paid underclass with no social security was deemed a positive step. The new crop of third class citizens with no voting rights would have to work well or perish. They were no longer an owner’s problem. The predictable consequences exploded in the numerous newspaper reports of the 1850’s and 1860’s. It took no time for this displaced underclass to come into conflict with the landowners and present a new problem. Initially it was dealt with using the gallows and the prison system, but delicate members of civilized society became more and more scathing in their published writings and this led to a galvanisation of human rights movements between 1860 and the turn of the century that threatened to topple world order. I will come back to that. The United States of America’s reason for joining the trend and abolishing slavery ultimately had nothing to do with the civil war, other than the winning side held the cards. Both sides were strategic friends of Zion [and some enemies], so the war was a safe bet. In 1863 Lincoln abolished slavery in the Confederate States by emancipation. However, this was a feeble gesture to weaken the Southern forces in the civil war. Nevertheless, his stakeholders cornered him into the full abolishment of slavery. Because he tried to reverse the direction of cabinet, his assassination was commissioned. In April 1865 John Wilkes Booth was hired by a masonic group [some argue was connected to or a splinter of Rothschild’s Illuminati] called (something like) The Order of the Golden Hand. Behind the scenes this event was significantly complex and a number of parties are implicated, including politicians and the Catholic Church. Just as in Britain, an impoverished underclass was created, but these were mainly black and not Irish. The significance of the abolishment of slavery was the cotton price in England was sent up fivefold and created a mini boom time.

The new rules of commerce favoured import/export. It was called the economic wedge. With a low paid labour force, cotton stock now had value prior to retail or wholesale. Stock now needed to be insured and required money changers’ services at every port of call. The money changers, unsurprisingly, were all Jews of the old order. Thus a relatively low cost product became quite a costly one when rinsed through the economic funnel. I have heard there is a statue or plaque donated by the Rothschild’s to the city of Manchester celebrating the abolishment of US slavery. Manchester was the prominent British resource point for skilled seamstresses at the time. Rigged commerce is not all that developed from the independence of the United States of America. On a side note it is worth mentioning that Englishman, Captain James Cook, was sponsored to circumnavigate the Pacific region for his third voyage in 1776, after “discovering” Australia in 1770. It is likely Zion was seeking the next United States of America in case of its collapse as a union. The late eighteen century was a turbulent period for the freemen of the United States. The so-called Boston tea party 1773-1776 saw a dispute between the British Crown and the East India Company impose a levy on tea, due to piracy and smuggling operations. The standard retail price per pound was about three shillings or more but smugglers could sell the same stock for two shillings and a penny. Though the levy actually reduced the price of tea sufficiently to undercut the smugglers by one penny, it enflamed British US relations to such an extent a band Mohawk imposers dumped 342 chests of tea into the bay of Boston. This directly impacted the Deep Sea Bubble stock market crash of 1790’s and the United States experienced a number of painful recessions throughout the early 1800’s. It is interesting that the gold standard was “invented” in 1696, collapsed in 1797, and reformed the British banking system in 1821. The party was over by 1890’s with simultaneous wars; Colombia, China (Boxer Rebellion) and South Africa (Boer War) and the gold standard was only saved by bonds, which first began in 1901 (I think), or “stock options”. That concept was refined with invention of the “premium bond” in 1950’s which was capitalised on by Britain’s Harold Macmillan with the consumerism boom of 1960’s. Unlike the prior bonds which acted like “shares”, premium bonds were indexed and better than currency. In effect the concept allowed the explosion of asset values, whilst being indexed to a superficial standard (such as gold) – a very clever idea. The next step had to be the derivatives market bolstering fraudulent trades aimed at compensating the bankruptcy of all Western nations after the Vietnam War. Currently, I am led to believe, the United States has $180 trillion of futures debt.

To be continued….

Advertisement

The Forces behind Judaism – Part One

For regular readers, I first need to open with an apology. My channels have requested I make this post before “Planets” is published. Interesting recent personal experiences might progress unwritten “Society Must Never Be Cashless” up the queue. This was meant to be a complete post, but when I had reached 5,000 words I knew it was too much for a single presentation. Indeed, it looks as if it will be broken into three or four instalments. The motivation came in a quiet moment which was a mini eureka. Indeed, as indicated last post, my current focus is the completion of my latest book, “Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons”. The recent preview of that book (which I did edit online, in case anyone missed that) made the startling revelation that Adam (man) of Genesis was not a Jew. He was a non-Jew but not a gentile, as Judaism had not been invented at the time. The Ketzer may disagree and so they should, because they are responsible for the modern Jewish identity, which is nothing more than tyrannous nationalism. According to the Ketzer, Judaism happened as the result of the creation of Jewish man a few thousand years ago. Jewish man was Adam and he was created in the image of God and all other men are imposters. According to this logic, these imposters look like Jewish men, but they do not look like God because only Jewish men were created in the image of God.

The problem is, as my latest post (The Birth of Humanity) disclosed, Adam was neither Jewish nor genetically anything like any modern human. We can postulate about his genetics indefinitely, but ultimately the test would come from correct understanding of the Genome (something our science does not) and a sample of his genetics. From Genesis it is clear Adam was Olmec and that is why the Annunaki Viracocha did everything in their power to preserve his living genetic identity. This world is a big place, so I cannot say for sure, but I very much doubt any unaltered Olmec DNA exists on this planet now, as I write. This is a shame, because if the Genome went non-commercial and tidied up its act, I believe true science (the virtuous resource) would, ultimately, be able to decode Olmec man. Mind you the Genome has already caused big problems for the Zionists. Is the “royal” Kagan family even slightly Jewish? The German word ketzer exposes the limitations of English. Our word “heretic” obscures the true meaning, which is fraudulent Jew – Jewish claimants that are not even slightly Jewish. English heretics are effectively pagans (those beyond the reach of God – and, at one time, gentiles). Christian heretics, according to this interpretation, obstruct the true message of Christianity and reduce it to a form of paganism.

To add to this con, we have the Semitism scam. The reason the Zionists imposed anti-Semitism on humanity is to thoroughly confuse ketzer adversaries. By attaching Judaism to Semitic genetics, they fend off any bloodline arguments. The core value of anti-Semitism is “to be Jewish must be to be Semitic” and none dare say otherwise, lest they be anti-Semitic. The fact that the “Jewish” Kagans have no Jewish blood, in my opinion, making them absolutely not Jewish, is irrelevant. They are protected by anti-Semitism. This is the tip of the iceberg, because according to the Genome project there are many, many fine, upstanding, tyrannous, intolerant Jews that are not actually Jews at all. Questions need to be asked of Binyamin Netanyahu and Shimon Peres, for instance. How Jewish are you? We know anti-Semitism is a scam because it stops well short of the Arab races. Now, and once again terrible news for the Zionists, it turns out the Genome project has identified that the Arab peoples are Semites and they are not included in the anti-Semitism doctrine. Some readers are now beginning to fidget, and for good reason. You say, “Are you telling us that some Jews ‘covered’ by the anti-Semitism doctrine are neither Jewish nor Semites?” You bet! And, I’m afraid this is “with knobs on”, because not only are non-Semite, non-Jews protected by anti-Semitism, but there are Semites that are targeted by the very same doctrine that supposedly protects Semites. The reason is anti-Semitism is BULLSHIT. Sorry that is not strong enough. It is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT.

I apologise to readers for my generalisations, but the problem is we have become too bogged down with detail. We need a clean sweep overview and then, from a position of higher understanding, we can drill down and look at parts of the detail. That’s why my historic appraisal is condensed. I deliberately avoid detail and those silly arguments that have propelled something that is not. My history is not going to be a detailed history and I am going to generalise on dates. I also assure the Zionist affiliates that might have visited this blog, you will find this uncomfortable reading (if you are still here).

My decoding of the Genesis ‘Adam and Eve” & ‘fall from Grace’ texts touched on last post revealed that, Biblically celebrated, Adam was not Jewish. In fact he was not technically not man, by our definition. He was neither Homo erectus nor human, so perhaps Olmec man would satisfy anthropology’s “Holy Grail” the ‘missing link’. There is a good chance that all the prophet-king dynasties up to and including Noah were also not human and almost certainly were not Jewish by modern genetic definition. The great mystery which, thus far, remains unanswered for my Biblical research, is when did the Sephardim bloodlines start? When were the Semites created? I have discovered the common element that separates the Semitic peoples from the rest. It is a common bond of Zeta Draco genetics. Sadly, there is no example of Zeta or Draco genetics known, so the debunkers are vilified on face value. Nevertheless the same debunkers are silent when faced with the proposal, for instance, that the so-called one dimensional (presumed to be the “first dimension”) straight line cannot exist in a three dimensional world that conforms to the rules of natural law (something empirics claims it enhances) as any side (of three dimensions) of zero value does not exist. I say to the debunkers that if Zeta Draco genetics were isolated they could be proven to be the unique quality of the Sephardic Jew and other Semites. As Sanni Ceto, an autistic woman, claims to be the reincarnation of EBE823 (not sure if I have the number right); the Futczhi (Zeta-Draco) pilot that made the error resulting in the crash infamously known as Roswell, it is likely “we” (or rather “black op’s”) do have a genetic stock. Considering Sanni Ceto claims she saw her old body (via astral projection) and it is stored in a vault somewhere in the US, maybe this is not “big news” for connected Zionists.

We know why the Futczhi were created. For readers that missed that insight. The Zeta (who were the ‘builders’ of this planet and are prominent on the guardian council) made a pact with the Draco (original indigenous “man” created by the Drakkon from Tyrannosaur and Pleiadian DNA) to enable the joint management of the development of humanity (which some might, equally, argue is the exploitation of humanity). Genetically the Futczhi are an oddity. I call them little blue diddy men. They have no heart (is that where the term heartless came from?) and a very odd gastric system which processes plant foods. Reports from those who claim they have met with the diddy men at best describe them as not on the same wave length as humans. They are considered psychotically arrogant, but that is also a Draco quality. Blue diddy men are often confused with Zeta worker clones, which are grown like flowers to produce adult foetuses. The insensitivities and robot-like behaviours of the “greys” is no reflection of the Futczhi. At some point in the history of man the Futczhi were a joint venture creation of the Zeta and the Draco. Their genetic bond was used to glue a new man of thirteen distinct bands, which are today’s Semites. The “some point” was certainly after the 10,400BC disaster which possibly ended humanity.

There is an interesting writer called Nokolai Levashov who penned Russian History Viewed through Parallel Mirrors. The work concentrates on three themes: the real history of humanity, referencing Vedic texts; the destruction of the Russian language; Zionist takeover of Russia beginning with the Workers (sic) Revolution. The corporate brotherhood behind Wikipedia is not impressed with what they call Levashov’s anti-Semitism. But we are now fully coherent in our conviction that anti-Semitism is a SCAM. Rumours have been circulated, unsurprisingly, that Levashov was murdered by Zionist sympathisers. Details are lacking and, whereas that may have been the case, it is unlikely as politically it is embarrassing. In addition Levashov is often incorrect in his reasoning, which is, at times, desperately unfair. Nevertheless, for his brilliant mind, he was an asset to humanity. For this post, Levashov’s contribution is his description of what he calls derelicts. In the old days (and by old days I am looking back 100,000’s years potentially) white light social order simply expelled their social bad eggs. Criminals were merely banished from the citadel and had to fend for themselves in the wacky, wild Bad Lands. Eventually some grouped together to form marauding bandit tribes. These tribes later infiltrated honest society via masonic orders and that was the start of the mafia powerhouses. Does anyone remember reading in their Bible about the origins of Judaism coming out of the Bad Lands and the harsh wilderness before finding the Promised Land?

Already, thanks to Mr Levashov, things have become more complicated. Is that why he was murdered? We learn that his derelicts (note how that word meaning has been deliberately deviated) were not broken alcoholics or drug addicts, but sometimes well connected and very influential fraudsters (you know, your standard banking type). After the fall of Atlantis (circa 13,800BC) he postulates there was a massive exodus out of Russia and, in the confusion, many derelicts found their way back into honest society. More so, as they were used to life on the road, they became the new leaders. Were they the infamous Israelite Hyksos? If this is so, they were of Aryan Slavic decent, Caucasian in appearance, and not even slightly Jewish. The Zionist intellectual core insists that the Hyksos were Greek and a relatively recent phenomenon. Jewish, historical chronicler, Flavius Josephus does not as he describes them as Israelite (referencing Plato, perhaps a hangover of the old Atlantis regime ten thousand years ago). It is unclear whether Plato was actually talking about the Hyksos, but I am sure he was. Were these the ancestors of the modern influential Zionists? If so, they would have been violently ambitious Russian Aryan Chieftains that formed mercenary armies, such as the Varangian Guard (arguably the pioneers of the Roman Empire).

The plot is beginning to thicken. But, the intellectual Jews will chirp, “Yes, but the Romans conquered the Israelites, so your reasoning has failed”. Not so as the Romans did not conquer the Israelites. Indeed the Israelites had been conquered by the Palestinians long before Rome became involved. Actually Roman intervention advanced the powers of the Sanhedrin and the ever more vocal dreadful Pharisees, so Rome saved the day. The Jewish exodus was a rebellion against Christianity, a cult that evened things up for the gentiles and reduced the Jews to slavery (by their definition). That is why so-called crusaders of valour (and cloaked Zionists) such as David Icke insist Jesus was a fraud and Christianity is a big “con”. In fairness to Icke, “Jesus” was a fraud in the way he (or, rather, they) has been deliberately misrepresented by various insular agenda driven Christian and non-Christian cults. Jesus, whether fantasy or reality, had destroyed the Pharisees despotic claims. The same claims are the backbone of Zionist order and control.

The Romans, we know, had adapted their version of the old Babylonian religion which is pagan sun worship. Once Constantine signed up for Christianity, his machine shaped Christian doctrine to conform to the spirit of Sol Invictus (sun worship). Thus, modern day Catholics are [presumably] ignorant pagans. The Babylonian religion appears to have been established by the Draco and this was adapted into Judaism by the Futczhi. It is possible that a percentage of the Mediterranean peoples had different origins and the clash of civilisations came with the exodus of derelicts from Russia thousands of years ago. These became the Huns of the Teutonic Tribes and the mysterious Celts. The historical development of Britain is even more mysterious. So much so, I believe real history has been altered to confuse those searching the truth. Few realise the Huns, Khazars and Mongols are the same basic stock.

After the Christianisation of Rome the violent and separatist tribes, such as the Huns and the Franks, were the same Zionist, Caucasian, non-Jewish elements that were behind the Pharisaic presence in the Sanhedrin of Jerusalem. Just as had been done in Jericho, the foul bands of derelicts either found strongholds in unoccupied lands or violently attacked peaceful settlers. Vikings of Scandinavia were of identical Aryan stock that did not pretend to be Jewish. Recent events in Ukraine have prompted the Zionist controlled mainstream Media to compliment Hitler for “attempting to wipe out 50% of German Slavs”. The intifada against the ruling party was the result of a Zionist “Jewish” leader favouring a pro-NAZI leadership style. No wonder the mainstream Media were guardedly worshiping Hitler. Anyway back to deep history, this Zionist-Aryan takeover of Europe after Rome converted to Christianity was only matched by an equally virulent conquest by the Roman Catholic Church into every corner of the known globe. Kings would pay homage to Rome and convert to Catholicism or face the wrath of the merchant banker financed mercenary freedom fighters, such as the Knights Templar. So powerful were the Knights Templar and other Christian armies, the Roman Catholic Church sponsored an inquisition backed by jealous Kings, such as Charles IV (from memory) of France, to break their hold. This also doubled as a front to rid the Merovingian curse (arguably the royal bloodline of Jesus) represented by Arianism. One of the core principles of Arianism is Jesus is not supernatural and not the Son of God. It is ironic that Marcus, a Roman aristocrat and Apostle, built a Gospel around the concept that Jesus was the Son of God. His Jesus was an incognito political Messiah and a figurehead in a war raging between Pharisaic doctrinal order and Gnosticism. That war is current though the parameters have shifted to a modern day canopy where freedom of speech (art) is pitched against order (dictatorial censorship). The thick end of that wedge is if freedom of speech is allowed, unabated, peaceful protests morph into violent and anarchistic movements given enough dissenters.

After the Promised Land of Israel was well and truly abandoned, it left a void for a new order to fill. This was the start of the takeover, when a new type of Jew was invented. These are historically remembered as a small band of Turkish peoples converted to Judaism sometime in the seventh century. That was the start of overt Pharisaic Zionism. With the dissolving of the Sanhedrin and consequent removal of the Council of Sadducees (Jesus wasn’t too fond of them either) Judaic principal was reduced to no balance whatsoever. Judaism was and is undiluted Pharisaic dogma or, rather, mainstream Judaism is a corrupt nest of vipers. No wonder the Orthodoxy has splintered into numerous political sects. The takeover, “officially” in seventh century Turkey, saw the invention of the Ashkenazy ketzer (heretic). These were the descendants of the Russian derelict mafia unshackled after the collapse of Atlantis. The ink was barely dry in the new Jewish encyclopaedia, when up sprang another interesting religion led by an “unknown” peasant simply called Mohamed. Though the Jewish establishment are unable to shake off their denial, he produced a new revamped Torah which comprised of proverbs called Hadith. Islam was a fusion of the worst of all the Christian “Pauline” sentiment and the most draconian aspects of Judaism. Of course, everything is tied up in a neat little bow and when Mohamed appears to have had weak literary moments, subsequent Islamic clerical administrators have purged texts by demoting spurious entries as probably unauthentic. The establishment of Islam led to fatal clash between the protectors of old order and the new infidels. At this time, prior to the Zionist engineered crusades, Muslims and Christians were in amicable non-conflicting relationships complimenting local common law. This is probably because both were old order outcasts fighting a common cause in many ways. They each bonded in their hatred of the Pharisaic persecutors which, invariably, masqueraded as non-Jews. An uneasy truce between old Jewish order and Islam began in Spain after the Moors conquered the whole of North Africa. Their reputation for relentless pursuit threated to overtake Europe, so the Zionists decided honey was the best solution to quell the flow of turmoil.

To be continued….

The Birth of Hu-man-ity and its Practical Implications

Over the last few weeks my focus has been devoted to making headway with my new writing project I have titled “Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons”. This may not be the title when the book is completed but, a third of the way into it; I see no reason to change. I do not wish to be like other writers, producing enormous bibliographies with a nugget reference every paragraph. To me that is plagiarism on steroids. Surely I can find enough that is fresh and new to fill a book that no one can say, “Well I like his ideas, but I prefer Philpot’s account”. However, producing something completely new also risks ridicule from professional debunkers who imagine fantasy at a hundred paces. Therefore, I have engineered a compromise. Whereas, I do not intend to provide a list of bibliographic references as the work is not a continuation of past wisdom, I have included a form criticism and textual analysis of the Genesis ‘Adam & Eve’ and ‘fall from Grace’ [so-called] parables. The analysis shows they are neither parables nor anecdotal, and will cause rumblings in theological circles.

To show I have been busy, I would like to present the end of the conclusions of this Chapter, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity and its Practical Implications”. It is unedited and long so hopefully it will read o.k.

Though readers must understand that Khazars, Mongols and Huns which made the original broad based populations of the Ashkenazy are not bloodline Jews, there is a genetic Jew. Khazar is related to the German word ketzer and means heretic or Jew. The German word musselmann is used as a descriptive noun for those who suffered the muscle wasting condition of walking death in WWII concentration camps. It is also German for Muslim. Modern Khazar royalty is linked to the Jewish Kagan family, prominently located in and occupying various positions of political power in the USA. We now know the Adam and Eve story was not concerning the creation of Hebrew, but Olmec man. The fall from Grace testifies the Reptilian Draco creation of a new impotent Aryan. No doubt coded information can be found somewhere in the Biblical Old testament, but I have not located it, so I must rely on intuition for my explanation. Simon Parkes has laid claim he is the reincarnation of Biblical Adam, who led a band of about two hundred men. Parkes claims he has met the current Draco king and a holograph of the Mantis premier. Yet, Adam was not a Hebrew and also was not one of the thirteen tribes (races). If my calculations are correct he preceded the creation of the Hebrews by around two hundred and thirty five thousand years. Though the Draco engineered a failed attempt at [their own version of] Olmec man twenty thousand years ago in southern Africa, this is not so important. Although it does explain why some Negro persons see Reptilian energy bodies so clearly they confuse the energy with flesh. It is likely the originals were more “Draco” than any other man on our planet surface.

Contrary to popular myths spun by the New World Order via alternative Medias and charismatic spokesmen like David Icke, the Draco are committed to resolving planetary turmoil and [counter] the compulsion of human leaders to abuse their governance. As, by Draco standards, human genetics are greatly inferior, commitment, at best, is lacking. They have been reluctant to use their own genetics as a replacement template, perhaps through fear of competition. Nevertheless the missing link in the Semitic Hebrew equation appears to be the [Zeta-Draco] Futczhi. In their way of harmonising disorder into order, the Draco created a new Hebrew man from thirteen races. Each tribe was a separate race related through shared Zeta and Draco genetics. That is why Zeta and Draco are joint guardians of the true Chosen people, which are not the Kagan Khazar Zionist imposters and others the Germans call heretics. I am not entirely convinced by the numerous flood stories indicating miraculous human survival after the 10,400BC disaster when the Earth’s crust briefly detached from its core and slipped. So, either stock was collected from the fleeting remnants on Earth and processed off world or everything post 10,400BC is “alien”. Do some of the Genome findings give credance to the consideration that ancient genetics can be switched on even after being laid dormant for several thousand years? Plausibly this would mean there might be an ancient store of preserved human and other genetics which could be used for regeneration of any archived restore point.

Incidentally, gauging a number of ancient myths, including the Adam and Eve and the fall from Grace stories, all plants and animals were created from the same sources of DNA used for humans. Thus far, this has been born true by the Genome Project. Bizarrely, bananas are fifty per cent human (or rather share fifty per cent of human genetic structures). This proposes the least plausible possibility; a fundamentalist interpretation of ancient Scripture. According to hard line creationists the world was formed somewhere between 6984BC (Alphonse X of Castile’s opinion) and 3616BC (Rabbi Yom-Tov Lipmann Heller’s view). Others more sympathetic to interpreting Genesis laterally have calculated the start before 10,000BC and perhaps as far back to 20,000BC. If this notion is to be taken seriously, then the 10,400BC disaster, which saw the Earth’s crust detach from its core, led to the collapse and disintegration of the globe. Only then might a new holographic timeline have been super-imposed and, thus, the creation of an entirely new origin. This would explain why real history has been so subverted. However, as the Genesis and other ancient texts are contextually current, theologians and historians might expect to find some clue [in them], but none is prevalentn other than the original [Genesis] genealogy (up to Noah) arguably might consist of pre-disaster genetics. It is also ironic that Noah is the one that survived the flood. Could this actually be an analogy of an off world repository of DNA/RNA (including all animals) which included the provision of three [genetic variant] “sons” used to rebuild surface life after the cataclysmic disaster? Did the violent outcomes of the disaster for a long period obstruct or seal all reasonable access points from inner Earth removing that decolonisation option? The creationists are certainly wrong as there is no indication that the Earth was destroyed in any ancient textual account (Sumerian and Mayan included), but several suggest it miraculously survived a severe battering (which included a planetary collision – Moon Falla?).

Enlightened writers have observed the scientifically unverifiable Turaneusian Pattern. This is the name given to a step process or evolution working towards ‘twelve strand’ DNA. In association with the Turaneusian Pattern alternative historic sources present a variety of Elohim light energy, which is called (by its group name) Zionites. These Zionites, sources day, travelled back in time to engineer a shift from Harmonic Universe One to Two (likely almost immediately after the destruction of Tiamat). It is unlikely this does not describe the creation of a second real time standard to create Earth in place of Tiamat one and a half billion years ago, but it may be refering to something else. According to the Genome and science we have always had ‘three strand’ DNA whereas our broken chromosomes are ambiguouslyunexplained (or, rather, mainstream science explanations mostly remain unsatisfactory). Nevertheless, according to Lloyd Pye and others, it would be reasonable to conclude that our higher being (Pleiadian) DNA had been nobbled in the hybridisation process. I have yet to scrutinise the detail but Alex Collier hypothesises at least twenty two alien races can be found in the human Genome pool. Given the method of the sun’s electromagnetic field, human ascension is booked in and will arrive on schedule providing genetic markers are activated. A relatively early attempt at stemming the progression was made by the Zetas in 1748. This is known as the “Zeta seal” and is a frequency fence attached to the harmonic energy fields of the Earth and the Sun which filters in a similar way to the “false matrix”. Arguably it was an attempt to restrict DNA progression to three strands. It is unclear whether it was activated by the Zetas or Zeta-Draco. Either way it would have needed to have been permitted by the guardians, so it must have had Zeta “sign off”. Gauging the enormous political changes globally either side of 1750 and knowing the Zeta’s time awareness, I suspect that date was not an accident. Zeta-Draco Futczhi were certainly the Eisenhower (?) partnered overseers of the catastrophic Philadelphia experiment of 1943. Though most are ignorant of the fact the ramifications are being felt today. Essentially, the Futczhi, in their unfathomable stupidity, decided they would bend time and light to permanently fix the human problem. They were lucky the Earth did not implode. Fortunately they only managed to hack the time network and the rest is history to come. Is 2084 going to be the feature date as I predict?

The diligent researcher must consider all evidence, no matter how bizarre or contradictory (when compared to popular calculated scenarios or outcomes). Turning back to deep history, fossils have posed more problems than answers. Much collected and archived has been ignored, forgotten or censored. Skeletal evidence of million years old human remains rather quashes the creationist’s ideals. Officially there is a great mystery as to why the dinosaurs systematically died out. Popular science theories propose the cataclysmic event that was an all-consuming meteor shower which stuck all parts of the globe more-or-less simultaneously. However, the same scientists that came up with that theory don’t question where the meteors came from and prattle on about natural cycles of things they neither have evidence for of nor have any understand of. Via channelled streams of inherent information, I have understood that science, ironically, was quite correct. There were extraordinary meteor showers, but that is not all. There were also enormous interposing forces which catapulted the Earth out of its position in relation to the sun. Indeed it may have only been the collision with Mars that fixed Earth in its current position which was Mars’ old location. Mars was then shunted out too far away from the sun and this would have made surface occupation intolerable. The event concured with a giant war between the Aryan Martians and the Drakkon Earthlings. At this stage the Draco had not been created as the event took place seventy eight million years ago. The meteor shower was the residue of the splintered planet Maldek. A deep problem with rationalising this information [as correct] is it took twelve to thirteen million years for the large dinosaurs to die out, so the meteors and Earth’s changed position and climate was not the exclusive reason for their demise, although may have precipitated a long chain of events to end the magnificent dinosaurs.

Rosine Lallement’s cosmic pulse theory does merit consideration. However, if there was a giant electromagnetic pulse generated by the centre of the universe that globally altered all DNA it does not explain why a number of smaller dinosaurs, such as crocodiles, remained unchanged after the event. Another theory claims the dinosaurs, in general, evolved into birds. The problem is identical and with a twist. For the large dinosaurs it would have been a mindboggling, and therefore implausible, downsize. The small dinosaurs group did not change into birds. Some stayed the same. Others may be contenders. In fact, as I have already explained, evolution does not work in the way mainstream science proposes. DNA is processed in the belt made from Earth’s electro-magnetic field co-joined with the Sun’s. DNA is processed at individual and group (family) level, so changes could see one or the entire group elevated. The group is broken into hierarchies which, equally, can see individual changes. There was an experiment a few years back which presented startling new insights. I forget the details; names, places and so on, so I can only offer a rough scenario. Verified distilled water free of life was placed in a sterile container and left for one month. When checked for life signs unusual single celled entities were observed. Over a control period the progress of the organisms was monitored and adaptive variety was observed. Though there is some ambiguity as to whether the container and/or the distilled water were truly sterile, or, indeed, something was not airborne (if the solution had not been compressed in a vacuum), the findings propose spontaneous existence is a reality.

There is another enigma which affects the analysis of the Biblical stories Adam and Eve and fall from Grace. At the precise point when the Earth suffered from the destruction of Maldek, it would have been a pretty hostile place to make genetic peace. If, as could be reasonably concluded from the massive change of climate, the large sized fauna and animals died out over an extended period evolution does not explain the change of life systems. Nevertheless, if there are bustling life systems in the temperate zones of inner Earth that might be suited to the old Mars surface conditions and not the sweltering super climate of the dinosaur age, then the change of hierarchy is likely to have come from a transfer of inner Earth resources to the surface. According to science, most mammals and so on were evolved by millions of years by the time they miraculously appeared after the demise of the dinosaurs. However, the real problem with determining that man was one of a worldwide array of animals and plants instantly created by the God’s, is man was at least part Earth indigenous stock, whether you select clay or dust as the code word for genetic culture. Homo erectus certainly preceded modern man, only contradicted by odd and unexplained geological finds dating hundreds of thousands or millions of years prior to rational datelines.

By way of conclusion, we have more questions than answers, but I shall attempt to summarise my findings and draw lateral recommendations. Firstly, at some time after the demise of the dinosaurs a new human was created by the Drakkon, as agents of Ba’al (manifestation of Lucifer). As the hybridisation process was manufactured by genetic steps, duration assessment ranges from at least a million and maybe millions of years. Built from (certainly) Tyrannosaur and Pleiadian and perhaps other DNA source material, they were the walking version of Tyrannosaurus Rex. At some point in Earth’s surface development they were forced below ground. This was perhaps 2,300,000 years ago, but the date is not particularly important. It appears the regulated inner Earth climate with the potential for hot and cool zones suited the Draco so well, they made it their permanent home. The legendary city of eternal life, Shambhala, may be the Draco inner world epicentre. If so, it is located relatively close to the region we call Antarctica and maybe only a few hundred miles inside Earth. By the time the part Pleiadian Annunaki arrived to create Olmec man about 250,000 years ago, the Draco had such a well-protected inner Earth stronghold they could not be defeated. Considering the mind blowing technologies the Annunaki had possessed, it is reasonable to assume that the Aryans of Atlantis were inferior and also were also no match for the Draco. I am of the opinion the reason their key technology centre was built around the opening of the corridor to the inner Earth (under the Arctic Circle of modern times) is they tried to encourage joint venture relationships with the Draco and not the other way round. Once again, it is likely the Aryans at Atlantis were insubordinate to the Annunaki technologically and intellectually. Decoding the ancient texts suggests our technologies (even allowing for “secret” undisclosed weaponary and so on of so-called super powers) are primitive in comparison and in a contest against the Draco we would be annihilated if that was their determination. This is consistent with rumours that the Military Industrial Complex’s “secret” TR3B “UFO” was a gift originating from the Draco. The Draco would not share anything dangerous enough to be used against them.

We have learned from the analysis of the Genesis texts Adam and Eve and the fall from Grace that man’s original version was conscience and Pleiadian DNA free. Original man was also all weathers black and did not need cloths, which suggests he may have had the ability to grow or shed a coat of hair like primates of today. The Adam and Eve “no suitable helper was found” line (Genesis 2:20) perhaps hints that Olmec man was neither domesticated nor wild and therefore could find no partner of equal temperament. It also hints at intellectual inferiority lacking the cunning management skills of modern man. Though no indication was given as to the work was required, “it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin and onyx are also there.)” (Genesis 2:11-12) is too much information for the context and this suggests that Olmec man was mining labour with the Garden of Eden provided as a convenient home. Something in the genetic mix of new man, created by the Draco, inhibited the production of a natural coat. We know that this mix did contain Pleiadian DNA, but the other ingredients are unknown (or no indication is given in the texts). Nevertheless, we have identified the Yahweh God as Beruzdia which is of the Mantis lineage. The Mantis are part of the group under Zeta guardianship and the Zeta (termite) energies were used in the production of planet Earth. At the highest material level Ba’al has a contract with Thoth, which is not the Sacred Ibis depicted by the ancient Egyptians but, rather, the mosquito energy body in manifest form. The orange browns to blackish purple Saurians are the creation of shared Ba’al/Thoth genetics which might mimic the native wasp energy field. They were created as an elite attack force and are of similar status to the Tall Whites.

After the disaster of 10,400BC the Draco created a newer man, which is sometimes called the Hebrew. The Hebrew was a genetic collaboration of thirteen different human races, each kept genetically correct, and the Futczhi (Zeta Draco). Zeta Tyrannosaur DNA (in minute quantity) is what separates the newer man from new man. However, there were also several attempts to upgrade original man (Olmec) with Draco DNA from about 20,000 years ago. Therefore parts of the Negro population contain Tyrannosaur DNA (but no Zeta). There may have been an attempt to create a Zeta Pleiadian and these would be the mythical mermen and mermaids which have probably been filmed and are occasional beached (evidence is always whisked way; never to be seen again). These beings (genetically advanced of us) have a special relationship with dolphins (created from Zeta and perhaps Pleiadian genetic stock). It is unclear when the so-called establishment had connected with the Futczhi but, certainly, the Philadelphia Experiment was a failed US-Futczhi joint venture operation. Discovery of Futczhi monitoring of Earth with incidents such as Roswell led to the establishment of Israel. Shortly afterwards and over roughly two decades purer extra-terrestrial Aryans and Lemurians made contact with various human circles, not necessarily political. These included representatives of inner Venus (Annunaki stock) negotiating with the American government of the 1950’s under Eisenhower. Venus society at the time was successfully controlled by a form of totalitarianism, although that has changed in recent times. Human societies, such as Germany’s Thule Society indicate that global political elements already have long standing relationships with Draco, including joint venture operations in/on the Moon, in Mars and at several Earth underground bases. The nature of these relationships is unclear as the Draco have evolved out of the third dimension. It appears they have manufactured go between bodies. I will discuss this next chapter.

Though very far apart and dimensionally disconnected, we are very much connected to Draco culture even if some [of them] regard us as savages or genetic sputum. Nevertheless they know of hereditary energies. To which end, they view the body as a husk (something I will discuss at length next chapter). Every new birth is a new window created from the old – a combination of the genetic identity of both parents. This genetic identity has an energetic history that travels back to the dawn of time. It is the management of these energies, via exotic external technologies, that the Draco, and their hierarchal peers, do so well.