My last five entries were so consumed with Fauci’s gain of function rollout and associated psychological Holocaust against humanity, I reached emotional burnout. Slap bang in the middle of the largest, most radical, truly global mass poisoning of humanity, I felt if nobody paid attention (which very few did; only the extreme minority, by the way), to write any more simply enabled futility. Nihilists love to cultivate (if that’s the right word) a perpetual sense of futility and I certainly have no intention of empowering them, even if by accident. But today I begin writing again for this website; the first time since 2021. Far from entirely dropping the ball, my other website became focus of a long article (greater than 10 thousand words) vaguely related to today’s topic. Published earlier this year, it may help add perspective to this unconventional offering.
Now I look back, anyone who bravely took up challenge of redigesting outpourings to make sense of the 50 thousand or so words that captured my thoughts between 2020 and 2021 will confirm I saw it all in my trademark round about and very differently presented way. Continuing that policy, much of what I will unveil about the lurid state of politics that has built to today’s unthinkable climate goes beyond controversial. Some content will make conspiracy theorists pale. This is not to say other political undercurrents opposing or contradicting my narrative are false. Far from it, many are true, but I affirm destructive guiding forces that maintain reasons behind charades, perhaps drawn out over thousands of years. Anyway, returning to my analysis of previous articles here, two gaping miscalculations made were to the great benefit of humanity and I am sincerely grateful for that. One, knowledge of corporate failure, has favourably impacted the world more than anyone could predict. Those malignant Zionists extorters must be reeling, and yes, they were decidedly behind the “vaccines” scam too. For anyone privy to my prior work, details of the two omissions I made are as follows. Manufacturing processes of the kill shots (death is precisely what was intended) were so shoddy, they proved “criminally negligent” (a quote from Pfizer’s former 2IC). This fact has been widely promoted, but few will be aware that extraterrestrial stakeholders (once resident in Rome, Italy) behind the smart, possibly organic microtechnology (dubbed graphene for morons) ended up double crossing their smelly human associates. One can’t help wondering whether Elon Musk received consultations on how to connect his scheduled “human automatons” into the cloud. While such “preposterous” subject matter may seem farfetched, pieces of the puzzle do neatly fall in place going some way to explain the “unexplainable”. Pressing on, perhaps these tall white aliens rued the possibility of their “bosses” using that crap against them one day. Bad news is, once hallowed “vaccines” provide aliens with instant one-way access to the affected human genome “block”.
Though reptilian overlord conspiracy theories have become notionally quite popular across the dark web, their most ancient “prisms” (scalable technologies beyond science comprehension) already do far more than access human group chakra portals. Vaccine graphene equates to the schoolboy version. To explain this in the simplest layman’s terms, I might reference progress in nuclear physics. Even a relative dummy like Einstein knew all atoms were connected (Oppenheimer, another friendly Zionist, speculated nuclear fusion’s domino effect would collapse all matter), but his institutional indoctrination denied his ability to grasp there is no such thing as nothing. Nothing quite literally doesn’t exist, because it cannot exist. Therefore, those with extraordinary faculties are able to tune into atoms and potentially go anywhere and any when they want. In such respect, reptilians can sort of manipulate the atomic layer and “tall white” aliens (named so by Charles Hall) demonstrated a primary, whist crude step in that direction with graphene. When Hall said he believed one of them would be presented as the Messiah, he was not exaggerating. The Globalists are counting on it and that’s why they have been kept on ice in Rome.
I should add, tall whites are configured at a different spiritual resonance to human, but close enough to our bandwidth to be able to interact physically. Bandwidth flexibility gives them added advantage of being able to blink out of existence at will. Hall famously talked about this “present” invisibility in his various books. Anyone on the outside of the goldfish bowl may rightly ask, who are the tall whites, why are they here and what is their role in relation to globalist (soft Zionism) agendas? Rather more actively integrated than even Hall suspects, originally, they were appointed as Draco reptilian (all this weird invective will start to make sense as the essay progresses) guardians to Earth. Reasons are complicated (impacting “human animal” conflicts), but suffice to say, each authorized agent is kitted with standard issue weaponized silver “medical” pen. Device threat should not be underestimated as, when on maximum setting, each pen is more lethally destructive than our most powerful nuclear missile.
Surprisingly, throughout his endearing testimony, Hall reveals nothing about tall white evolutionary origin or wider political purpose. So, it is left to me to divulge information. From origins perspective, compared against our direct ancestry, they are a baby species, which is odd in itself. In terms of creation date, that was around 40 thousand years ago. It is peculiarly rare that a higher spectrum species, in this case based on the human template (some might potentially argue our next version) is created to physically intervene over genetic seniors in high spiritual matters. Sure, the “angry God” warning of biblical Genesis may provide insight here. Knowledge is certainly thought provoking. Like us, were they created to satisfy some external, strange alien agenda? As such, tall whites are most unnatural guardians of our planet. Yet this guardianship is why I personally question their supposed extraterrestrial status (kindly reference Gilgamesh’s epic tale); a position (to his credit) Hall affirms. They are not only superfluous architects of the failed kill shots, but perhaps have a role in deep twists and turns of human religio-political evolution. According with real objectives behind phony World War III; what is their involvement in a depopulation agenda to “break” our speeding ascension collision course?
Touching on some critical answers later and, before unravelling where hidden hands have featured in human politics, it is important to qualify a couple of points I just made. From the conceptual objective, kill shots have so dismally failed, evil masterminds are almost confident enough to confess guilt (bellicose David Rockefeller style). Nevertheless, operations did prove a little too effective for comfortable overt confessions. So vapid mainstreamers have done everything within power to deny or diminish extreme or unusual quantities of associated sudden deaths, turbo cancers, mysterious blood clots and other “anomalies” (such as “vaccine” causing the most virulent long Covid strains). Handling of the situation very much follows hallmarks of Zionist ambitions (which I have argued were at the top of the multi-level pyramid marketing scheme). Stakeholders are shown not as brave as they are bellicose, but their effective spinning of narrative cannot be entirely laughed off either. In such respect tall whites appear to have done little more than influence feasibility. Operations in fact were part of Zionism’s pungent unending psy-op, which is deliberately gaining momentum towards a planned mythical piece-de-resistance. “Epic” World War III was scripted by agent Orwell to take place in 2021, demonstrating agendas are now way off course (Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu publicly “anticipated” a mini-Armageddon event sometime between 2015 and 2017). Chillingly, even a phony “completion of the narrative” promises to usher in catastrophe. And don’t those globalist sub-ranks know it. They pray for intervention, because without help from tall whites, Samson absurdity will mean no one wins.
But there is some good news that may give hope. The current “brotherhood” (orchestrated by point man, Netanyahu) are so obsessed with winning in their own lifetimes; they have already turned completely insane. Insanity is only capable of procuring chaos. Chaos guarantees error. Doom and error were Dr Strangelove’s destiny and downfall. Perhaps Peter Sellers knew the truth, because not all of Zionism’s enablers want global cataclysm or Armageddon. Alleged Maui resident Mark Zuckerberg was quick to join the celebrity fad of painting his roof blue. Life in bunkers can become over tedious very quickly. Besides, are those coffins really safe and reliably blast or radiation proof? Perhaps this is not going to be the real issue. Here I feel compelled to introduce Israel’s [as yet unknown] insurance policy. They apparently (unless I have the wrong timeline) possess a “super-weapon” (a type of light that alters matter, reorganizing time to dramatic effect on those exposed), which was gifted to them by a different extra-terrestrial network. Cork can be unstopped to let out the genie once, prohibiting testing. I can’t help feeling, when activated, it will turn out to be yet another big fat “double cross” dud.
Judaism is complex, splintering into many differing traditions. Politics undulates to compensate. Some elements are obstructively opposed to the other. Yet, no Jew ever seems to question Israel, the fundamental. None ever seem to publicly (at least) question why Israel was “given” to them (in particular) or what it represents. If you murder the Olympic gold winner and steal his medal, can you rightfully claim the award as well? Too many Jews are dulled to the prospect of unshackling their minds, because doing so would potentially open a can of worms. Perhaps this is fault of Passover school brainwashing? None appear aware that Israel is direct legacy of Atlantis and contemporary use of “Star of David” abhorrently mocks authentic communion solidarity below God. Indeed, in reality no human being could possibly attain Israel, so why promulgate myth? Clearly, at the very minimum “some” Hebrews (most ancient) would have known the basic truth that Israel embodies a physical heaven. Therefore, since knowledge was conveniently forgotten (censored?) over time, at some juncture Judean masses must have been “played” by their leaders, traditions and memory remaining altered ever since.
For Israel (the magical wilderness) settlement, ignoring earlier sporadic collisions stemming from Arabian ancestral heritage conflicts, Roman (Philistines) inevitably (from the karmic perspective) first conquered and then sacked the Jews. Following psychological (Babylon-esque) exodus, sensational pogroms (not marking any other creed) reputedly targeted their historical settlements every few figurative years. If true, are we expected to believe that they were blameless; unfairly singled out while “minding their own proverbial business”? Perhaps that’s the same type of minding your own business that proffered boa constrictor control of “mainstream” Medias in Hitler’s NAZI Germany; Medias that dotingly championed all Zionist aligned talking points without question. And, of course, when Hitler dared to fight back (perhaps similar to Trump or Putin in the modern-day configuration), it was he that was vilified as monstrous evil. For instance, his detractors commonly site that immortal “big lie” quote from Mein Kampf as evidence of Hitler’s moral depravity, when he actually accused lock step Jewish Medias of seeding deception with the big lie (truth affirmed by Goehring in many published writings).
Identical technique is maintained to the letter by today’s Jewish Medias. With one fundamental difference. Today “narrative” has almost completely replaced need or function for facts and truth. In such respect, this gives me an excellent opportunity to segway across to Isreal’s “triumphant” return in 1948 and subsequent bloody forever Nakba, culminating in that October 7th “inside job”; a decoy to activate the final solution (Fourth Reich). In association, aside from repugnant narrative framing, over-quoting that notorious Amalek passage from the bible gives no justification for “permissible” genocide. It has been supposed God’s endorsement of the Jews as “chosen people” furbishes them with absolute right without reprisal. Was that true, why would any “chosen” lead terrible lives? Why would all “chosen” eventually sicken (in identical fashion to unchosen) and die? The “chosen people” narrative is devoid of reasoning, undoubtedly a deliberate ploy because conclusions simply vilify supremacy for supremacy’s sake. To counter, vermin philosophy (or savages) can be applied against any nationality or group, such as Palestinians, as is the case today. Did the Jews all too frequently fan their “chosen” supremacy with arrogant belligerence over the other throughout the ages? Why do predictable pogroms “surprise” impartial observers? In context, later I will example why I theorize truth behind the mysterious Amalek myth has been pathologically obfuscated by malignant Zionist sympathizers. Hitler, Goehring and Ayn Rand were correct and each has been starkly dishonoured.
Supremacy is like pregnancy. There is no middle ground. It is absolute, though how associated historic developmental equations evolved may seem unconnected to today’s state of affairs. For instance, modern day equations in relation to a “WEF” sponsored Fourth Reich agenda identify that violent eruptions in Ukraine and Palestine are intrinsically linked, when analyzed correctly. Due to the perennial blockade on truth, explanation why Israel and Ukraine are umbilically connected is likely beyond reach of any professional literary source. Professional literary sources only have access to universal sagged out propagandas of the likes of the song that never ends; Finklestein’s representative “Holocaust”. Whereas I am in awe of unmatched diligence the professor has devoted to Gaza, his own Jewish legacy has hemorrhaged his vision with respect to the hollowest of hoaxes – did six million really die? But, moving on to more pressing matters, why has (old NAZI) Klaus Schwab’s fearless young leader (Putin) treated suffering peoples without a nation so gently? To me this is as strange as the Christian Zionist view that Palestinians must surely be hereditary Philistines. Off the record, everyone should know that hereditary Philistines (or Ukrainians, cough, cough) run the Israel project and perhaps key elements have always been instinctive Zionists. Notion is more than adequately highlighted by post-World-War-II mockery that is antisemitism. Palestinians are legitimate Semites. Most Jews are not. But I suppose words and meanings change all the time, or so those that embrace chaos insist as much.
To address (or perhaps unravel) the mystery that is Israel, we must resort to truth, as unpopular as it has become. Determining truth is logically enshrined in honest etymology. Now I would like to review and satisfy confusion over Palestine and Philistine and significant differences of ancient origin. As such, “stine” when separated out from Palestine denotes “rock” (as in arid, solid stone). Associated meanings change for usage in Philistine. Here the identical word was given to mean diamonds or gemstones, which implies “supreme power”. However, when that meaning is partnered with “Li”, connotation becomes negative (evil) or poisonous. The region was generally known as land that did not support life, so Pa-le consequentially compares to something like “forsaken”. Rightly, terminology actually bears no relationship to phil-li. Phil instead presupposes the right to rule over; a notion modern day Israelites seem to take for granted. Ironically, that would be a correct name to justify forced colonialization of the region as Phili is a plausible (if not ideal) way to say “evil despots”. Arabian civilization long predates Israel, which means Britain’s mandate spitefully forsook an entire people. In this context, arguments pertaining to Israel’s rightful heritage are more than somewhat superfluous. Recreation of Israel had been a bloated afterthought, a pipe dream of supremacists (per human conception). Naming Philistine would aptly elaborate truthful destiny, but invaders will never be Palestinians because they are now called Israelites.
Thankfully Balfour had a wicked sense of humour. He knew the plan; a plan that had been hatched generations before his birth. George Carlin was right. It is just one big club collecting the few, which has been in existence for thousands of years. Issues and topologies change with the ages, but objectives never do. The objective has always been absolute control of everything, which includes mastery over nature. Man, at the ultimate, has believed he can be God. Granted, though doing and believing are worlds apart, they incrementally come closer together with every passing advancement. Truth today has become so warped by nihilism; reasoned beliefs have transcended into chaos. Propaganda wafting endless “sold out” expert opinions vainly exploit a sense of victorious optimism (hubris), but this only captures the imaginations of those dead on their feet. The house of cards is about to come crashing down, beginning with the fall of Israel. Virtue will cause a chain reaction to ignite an implosion of Globalism (the flawed Zionist front).
Regardless, tyranny consistently takes the high ground, presenting its own image as invincible and the foe, “the other” unwitting. Aligned history has predicably been reduced to vague, unlikely caricatures of reality. History, as recorded, offers little more than agenda driven talking points or esteemed propagandas destined to preserve “belief” much at odds with truth. Napoleon was right. Propagandists are invariably those historic record rewards. For instance, if we dare reflect on the whole sorry episode recorded as NAZI history, who benefits? Who benefits to the detriment of everyone else? The Jews below Zionism benefit of course and in so many ways. They benefited from reparations; German reparations issued to “survivors” (sic). No one else received any reparations to my knowledge. In fact, very few (if any) gentile aristocrats who ran for their lives to nowhere received compensation or even a fraction of plundered real estate returned. All that was lost in fog of war, as were original “provable” identities of German Jews. Not the English, not the Americans, not the French, not the blacks, not the gays, unless they were Jews. They benefited from a “homeland”, stripped from the indigenous owners (who happen to be rightful Semites) and this had been preordained by British Prime Minister Balfour in 1917. It wasn’t until 1933 that Germany’s NAZI party would formally establish and who’s first act was to broker Jewish passage [to Palestine] in formal agreement with Zionism. What of the unconscionable Marxist (Hitler enabling both sides?) attack on Germany’s aristocracy? People that say the Third Reich was defeated by the Allies speak with forked tongue. We now have corporate responsibility and other trappings lifted straight out of the NAZI playbook.
Whereas, in my opinion, figurework presents gross exaggeration, why wouldn’t tragic deaths of 27 million Russians, killed through consequence of World War II, take precedence over all other memories if reason and fairness played a part in historic record? Did not a million (underestimate?) German Slavs roasted alive by “Allied” bombs receive a satanic real holocaust? For the allies, wouldn’t their own dead take greatest honour and place of precedence over all other considerations? Not so, it seems. It seems the reward and preservation of a Jewish state was the singular motivation guiding historic record here, even after Zionists had to slowly crawl back Eisenhauer’s potty Poznan theory. Everything was secondary to the “big lie” and that can mean one thing. History was written by those under instruction of or sympathetic to corporate Zionism, just as Balfour was in 1917 and Hitler (the great enabler) was in 1933. Plans had been hatched long before to enable seamless NAZI collaboration, in part designed to levitate the Jewish “cause”. Zionism’s founder Hertzl was German, for pity’s sake. Because, when conflicts rise, mainstream historic record has shown not the remotest effort to support due diligence or inclination towards truthfulness, echoes are hardly clearer. Time preserves most errors and most lies. More outrageous the dialogue, more concerned, sincere intellectuals scratch their heads in bewilderment. Bizarrely fantastical nature of certain explanations fails to improve with age or after honest critique. Without desire for enlightenment, rationalized dementia will persist.
Classically, no evidence was necessary to support the New York Times May 1945 account of Auschwitz, even though death figures have been revised downwards by a staggering 3 million (…and counting). In fact, there has never been any actual, factual evidence of much-vaunted gas chambers (a war propaganda story) that overwhelmingly defy all credible engineering standards (let alone why go to all that trouble?). But when has credibility ever limited nihilistic imagination? Only a complete moron would argue Hitler had any remorse. Yet, Zionist lunatics fantasize his remorse was so great (well, they are the chosen ones), he was compelled to convert cyanide gas distribution apparatus back to ordinary shower rooms (removing evidence) before burning himself to non-recognition in his war bunker. Yeah, if you believe that, I’ve got some great condos for sale on Mars. Want one with a lunar sea view? Incidentally, long time after the fact, “Hitler’s” charred bones given to the Soviets as “war bounty” were tested and found to belong to different females! Tip of the iceberg? Certainly, because another critical point worth exploring is the 6 million dead fraud which, from memory, had been conceptually contrived by those spurious but menacing 1896 Protocols of Zion. Designers seemed to feel that if you were going to announce a big lie, you may as well screech out a howling whopper.
Whereas I haven’t been able to cite many examples myself, one controversial source of mine claims to have located more than two hundred 6 million Juden dead headlines of varied prominence that were ceded across popular western broadsheets between 1900 and 1945. Most famous example was absurd but immortal 1919 Washington Post’s (front page?) banner. Subliminal programing seems to have been effective, because, overall, the Jews did really well from NAZI Germany (which was wholly funded by Jewish American bankers, Schiff & Co. who also bankrolled the 1917 “Russian” revolution if memory serves me correctly); a collective conspiracy implicating western nations. On reflection, they have been gifted an exclusive homeland undramatically stolen by Balfour, populated by Hitler (patriotically rooted German diaspora were primarily those destined for concentration camps, whose supply chains were spinelessly destroyed by the Allies) and enabled by Eisenhower (who conclusively lied about the Holohoax). They were gifted pensions from post war Germany for doing less than nothing, when few others received a shred of deserved compensation. But all that pales in comparison against Zionism’s crowning achievement; an achievement soon to be permanently destroyed by overreach?
The dreadful Holocaust is the greatest gift Zionist propagandists and their enablers conjured up for Jews. When used in lockstep with weaponized antisemitism (post reformation ADL tool), they are granted natural immunity against pretty much any other possible cause, because the song that never ends tells us so. Per instilled doctrine, they have had the greatest tragedy ever, so are deserving of all rights and we, the other, must be grateful – eternally. But all that good work was undone on October 8th 2023, when they conducted their own vicious, aggressive genocide against innocents. Without empowerment (great tragedy inspiring sympathy), antisemitism (amulet) dwindles to irrelevance. Clout of antisemitism has predictably crumbled daily following Israel’s unmitigated mass attack on blameless Palestinians. Funnily enough, had Israelite propaganda been rather more honest, antisemitism may have remained unscathed. The reality on the ground is such that most Palestinians (at some level) champion Hamas in spirit and most natural Israelites (at some level) champion Zionism in spirit. From that dismal perspective, both Hamas’ attack and Israel’s defense is justified.
Returning to World War II saga, many Jews were deliberately starved to death by the “Allies” (with friends like these, who needs enemies) so “prosperity” could blame NAZI’s and nasty Hitler’s non-existent pledge. Today’s NAZI’s (real ones) bomb the concentration camps as well. Indeed, they have taken things a step further towards the abyss. Destruction so great and mercy so lacking in their pathology has caused a diametric shift of conscious opinion. Such remorselessness is now seen in the same (or worse) light as propagandized NAZI Germany atrocity, with Jewish tyranny against Palestine reviled as a true Holocaust of sorts. Comparisons have been made against the destruction of wartime Germany, yet at some level there is the belief that even NAZI’s at least had the capacity for compassion, whereas systematic or spiteful Israelites do not. Once revered chosen ones are now universally ridiculed. No law is powerful enough to halt moribund antisemitism after tsunamis of feeble and frustratingly dishonest propaganda. It is dead and buried beneath rubble laced with Palestine’s rotting corpses. Sympathy for Israelites has generally been replaced by abject horror and loathing. Lest we forget.
Aside from the fact informed logic prohibits any lateral Holocaust against the Jews, there is an additional enigma almost never discussed in supposedly “educated” circles. According to routinely corrupt Wikipedia, Germany’s population (within existent borders) was 65 million in 1933. Traditionally, so-called Diaspora have accounted for 2 to 3% of any civilized country’s population, with possible exceptions in Spain, Holland and a few other places. England was no different in 1933, though a decidedly unrepresentative governing cabinet was reputedly greater than 50% Jewish. Hitler illuminated his distaste for Hebrew mafioso “microcosms of society” early in public life. Playing along with the “program”, via an aforementioned Zionist treaty (only one brokered with the NAZI regime), all Jews were offered wholesale unhindered passage to Palestine. They didn’t say, ones that chose to disobey would remain at their own peril. “Warning shot” Kristallnacht (November 1933) in my opinion had been organized by Zionist thugs to reinforce stark reality to Diaspora who decided to neglect their true identity.
Sadly, losing all references, I find it impossible to substantiate a long-buried information source. Nevertheless, under the impression that Germany conducted a census around 1933 (or possibly slightly later) which revealed less than 250 thousand Jews within its natural borders, figurework seems particularly relevant. That would represent a fraction of the (2 or 3%) expected quota, but could be accounted when factoring in mass exodus to Palestine. Given the supposedly unfavourable political climate, many Jews may have conceivably lied about their faith which would explain low quotas. Conversely, if such fear was simply founded from detracting propaganda and of no actual basis, does that not explain why copious amounts of Jewish-American banking money had been thrown at Hitler? Thus, I am deeply skeptical about the whole “panicked Jew” narrative. For instance, was yellow intended to represent them as Germany’s “gold star” citizens? A far cry from what we are told.
Even if actual population numbers did add up to a million, allowing for no more than 300 thousand child bearing couples, how could swells reach 6 million dead without wiping out every man, woman and child, inflows significantly subsidized by other nationals? 6 million dead is an impossibility. Besides, the worst struck peoples were almost certainly the Slavs. If the 6 million is to be taken credibly, overall numbers had to account a significant chunk of German society interned. Then again, whilst interment was unquestionably not ideal, some camps or ghettos for [mostly more orthodox] Jews gave out “prepaid” letter cards and other frills. Why? Also, their supply chains were mysteriously (sic) not directly impacted by Allied bombings, surprise, surprise, so few really suffered. Most emphatically targeted (Churchill knew precise consequences) areas, such as Frankfurt, Hamburg and particularly Dresden destroyed Slavic civilians, not jews. Destructive comparison made with Israel’s current assault of Gaza is argued worse than Dresden, leaving 2-3% (of overall populations) “officially” dead (though external estimates range four or five times that volume).
It is vital to clarify fundamental reason for collapse of antisemitism. Murderous Israel’s spiteful and unfounded attack on perceived innocents outrageously presented as self-defense quite literally beggars’ belief. Resulting perceived Palestinian gross injustice began the effect of assuring auras once preserving and protecting the Holocaust myth (“big lie”) will be immortally shattered. People are just beginning to question the whole NAZI narrative. Even Iran’s spiritual leader can now pluck up enough courage to gingerly challenge that escapade. To which end, only one possible outcome might both pervert and expand broken tradition. If Israel was to engineer its own Holocaust (a real one this time), that surely would win over doubters and deniers. In relation to this, Putin’s approach in Ukraine is rather more unnerving than is perhaps suspected by those rare thinkers. Justifying philosophy of the invasion has caused rationality problems from the start, even from his own people. What did he call it? A special [limited] military operation that definitely isn’t a war, although some “fog” over lack of war periodically creeps into the Russian press. Local Russian hard liners (their equivalent of neo-cons) have apparently questioned why Putin has not whacked Kiev with all his might from the very outset, which would be logical. That’s what the “West” was expecting also. Putin’s cautious approach seems to serve no legitimate objective, unless there was a hidden agenda.
So, the deeper question is, has Putin been playing a double game all along and how or why does this enable Zionism? According to fringe sources, his father was head of NAZI operations (perhaps he recruited teenage George Soros) in Ukraine, although information contradicts Wikipedia’s Soviet naval officer account. NAZI’s, as we now know now, were in so many ways responsible for the reformation of Israel in 1948 (as Orwell subliminally reflects in “1984”); an initiative designed under instruction of Balfour’s 1917 agreement with Zionism’s representative, Walter Rothschild. How does everything link up? Well, Israel’s current rampage has attacked innumerable priceless historic relics, including the most ancient standing church, which is believed to have dated back to Jesus’ time. Activity is on a precise par with 1917 Bolshevik ideology committed to prosecuting a would-be universal de-spiritualization program, a program that involved neutralizing mystique of historic cultural heritage (aptly expressed in Ukrainian Prokofiev’s “Stalingrad” piano sonata). Putin’s father was ultimately responsible for liquidating Slavs (hated for their uncontrollable nationalistic nature) in Ukraine. The NAZI military machine concentrated on Russian Slavs (also hated) with such pathological fervor, sacrifice cost them the war. Though losses were possibly gravely exaggerated, enormous numbers of Slavs were terminated. Tellingly, one and only deadly promise Hitler did make was to rid Germany of 50% of Slavic nationals, which demonstrates he was a Zionist. He claimed he did not like “Juden” but never went further than that publicly; as much as apologists love to assure otherwise. There is another tidbit that might highlight conspiracy. Spiridon (Putin’s grandfather) was the Tsar’s chef who attempted to poison Rasputin (a spiritual leader with strange powers), promptly changing allegiances to serve both Lenin (Ulyanov) and Stalin (Jughashvili) without protest.
Going against the de-spiritualization program for reasons that will become clear, to the best of my research, Putin has been very careful not to target any of Ukraine’s heritage or commercial value assets. Bakhmut left a demolished concrete jungle; relic of communism. Ukraine’s soldiers are Slavs. Russia’s soldiers are Slavs. According to “the agenda” greater the liquidation, no matter whether Russian or Ukrainian, better the result. Collectively enormous numbers have been killed or near killed. If propagandists casually lay claim to “hundreds of thousands”, real figures must be catastrophic. Will the exodus of more than 10 million deserters be allowed back? This might seem a strange question, but if Putin is indeed playing a double game, consideration won’t seem so strange. Had the special military operation been a ruse all along (other than it deliberately targeted violent ultra-nationalist “Hamas style” protectors to cleanse the land to allow unchallenged settlement of a different “civilized peoples”), then potentially devious objectives could be deciphered from operations. Which peoples would be civilized enough for this newly “anointed” land? Let us consider who. Well, Israel’s Netanyahu spares no opportunity to brag that his Zionist hoards are the apex of civilization. One must preclude Jews unimpressed by Zionism’s horrific practices are outlawed from sentiment. They would be doomed to languish in FEMA (concentration) camps or equivalency under reconfiguration of a “NAZI holocaust”, should core authority interests get their way. To finally answer the earlier question, “how or why does Putin enable the Zionist agenda?” According to elitist mindset, the world is unequally divided between civilized peoples and savages. Savages, just as beasts of burden, are destined to serve the civilized. Culture is a form of idolatry that can galvanize slave movements into disorderly rebellion. That is why there is a progressive attempt to “multi-culturalize” the world into “one world, one culture”. Of course, civilized must have culture to distinguish themselves from savages.
Based on current behaviour to call the group “beast of civilization” would be more apt, but I did question the whole chosen ones’ narrative earlier. It is time to reevaluate mythology. Might some truth be behind pompous claims? Unsurprisingly, a serious side to the story has been overlooked by time. Many thousands of years ago chosen people were destined to rise from the ashes of Atlantis. Naomi Wolf’s corresponding views are basically correct, with need of a little adjustment. Atlantis ascended were in fact chosen to be the most hallowed of all the brethren. Per such auspices, they were anointed as spiritual role models to set an example for other, more primitive inclusions to the human fold. Basic philosophy was simple. Could those that reached a peak of spirituality, ascent of honoured divinity be anything other than loved by their fellows? Of course, love might not sufficiently represent surrounding good will. How to regard role models for perfect, gracious lives? But that is how and why chosen ones’ identity persists. Implications, even on casual reflection, are extreme. For instance, it is certain original chosen ones were Jews (although observed commitment would be unrecognizable today). Suffice to say, what Judaism has grown into is of no relevance to the original (though integral aspect of chosen status), regardless of remonstrations from selfish good Jews (such as Netanyahu) and other politically motivated wind bags. The original Jewish faith was formed under a temple, notionally so much more than an existential access point to God. The temple was [in effect] Israel, because Israel (according to Sirian culture) is the manifest Kingdom of God or physical heaven on Earth. Holy embassy was (or acted as) resurrection of Babel (an infamous Atlantis tower that preserved identity of God – Bel).
Creation of faith envisaged that the temple (God) would be eternal. That notion alone confirms original Jews were indeed the chosen ones, of such unblemished spiritual character, they were not only destined to represent God on physical Earth but were bestowed with the responsibility of perpetuating His kingdom eternally (Pha, Ree, See). To place thinking in adequate context, I considered analogies around the word “defense”, though concluded it impossible to defend the indefensible. In truth, to never antagonize hostile reaction is the only feasible means to attain eternal tenure on Earth. Could a group of individuals given the power of such enduring love and empathy for the other ever cultivate circumstances permitting their own demise? The answer to that question must be an emphatic and unequivocal “no” of course. Arrogant crud that presumes absolute right over others merely because some or other austere cleric granted them social status invite attack, perhaps deserving of annihilation. Is that why Jews suffered so many “pogroms”? Had descendants retained unaltered ancestral ethos and ethics, their populations would have been blessed as heroes by all mankind. All would have an interest in preserving the temple, regardless of circumstances. Today it would be proudly surrounded by combined Russian S400 and American Patriot defense systems, presuming the world had found any necessity to develop along a war path. We learn from Samson’s tale, destruction of the temple rendered the Jewish faith obsolete, a truth even Hassidim refuse to acknowledge, but a truth nonetheless. To their credit, they do agree resurrection of Israel must be abominable.
In order to complete context, I will finally explain Promised Land tradition (evidence of which was distorted by “Moses” – Babylonian chief scribe Baruch?). Generally speaking, without understanding cultural centres of gravity, it is difficult to apply representative logic defining why one pledge is sacrilegious and another is not. Even so, when “math” is honestly applied, motive usually becomes clear. In such respect, why would a fair, universal (creator of all things) permit the sacrifice of Amalekites for unnecessary or perhaps whimsical empowerment of Judeans? Anyone even suggesting occurrence mocks divinity. Truth will come out about Amalek, but what I am about to reveal now provides common-sense explanation that permits workable Promised Land philosophy. In line, were we to assume devout chosen people came before any sacred place, divine provenance might spring eternal as an extension of enduring philosophy. depending on circumstances resonating the universal yen towards defending any chosen need. Why wouldn’t a beloved, sincerely cherished people deemed as the epitome of spiritual man by “the other” be welcomed as permanent guests of or even willingly gifted any suitable land “considered paradigm appropriate”? The Promised Land was anywhere these holy Jews wanted to settle, providing they remained truly holy. Moses transmuted goodwill into war against the other and the Jews have battled phantom enemies (those in their way) ever since. Amalek is a rather different situation, which I will get to.
Mask off, current fanatical Zionist core value base exposed, perhaps comparisons some are making with the NAZI regime are valid. Before I unpack why, basis for choice of word “Zion” is essential to add weight to evaluation. Ancient Hebrew tsion means fortress. Fortress though, in practicality, comes with dual meaning. Ancient structures so named contained dungeon cells. Alex Jones’ “prison planet” provides excellent analogy, because Zionism has been squarely formulated on a Messianic agenda that predicts forced eternal peace on Earth (US hegemony poorly manages the soft version), societies unequally divided between “jailed” and “jailors”. From this, vain unconvincingly argue a self-assured Isreal with natural borders could control the entire world through mystification (psy-op). Grim reality is such that only unless every square inch of the globe is conquered and neutered, there will always be the threat of attack. 1890’s founders of the cult did not originally intend to reform Israel, planning to restrict homeland access to “like-minded”, which does compensate the NAZI’s rough treatment of uncooperative orthodox Jews. Israel aside, control structures might resemble a disfigured, dystopian pyramid modeled on Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (Revelations). Zionism (Globalism), Satanism (inversion of order), Atheism (human God) and Materialism (denial of anything spiritual) act as foundational corner stones. According to presiding biblical ideology, any “Messiah” fulfilling prophecy must be a federal, global figurehead and natural leader of the peaceful world. The Messiah must tame or break Magog (Aryan) and Gog (Nubian) spiritual centres (legacy of Draco preservation).
As far as Zionism is concerned, when a leader is unable to bring natural harmony to Earth he may still rule as Messiah by practically removing all threats. So, with that additional background, I am now able to proceed with evaluation of how and why Nazism was merely one leg of manipulative relay race managed by architects also enabling Zionism. As such, is not an Aryan (Iran) superior master race ideologically identical to (and reinforcing) notional Jewish supremacy beneath “chosen” status? Post fall of Atlantis, though stranded survivors travelled from Southern Russia, they all initially collected in Iran (or Persia, as it was known before) for refuge in the Caucuses. These “survivors” (a concept carried over by the phony Holocaust) shared common identity via the Egypt located Arc of the Covenant, a relic remaining from Atlantis (preserved as so much more than switch box of another Atlantis relic, Great Pyramid of Giza). Were senior figures from Moses’ generation (by the way, who generally identified as Babylonians) aware that Hebrews were Atlantis banished, later “endorsed” by a visibly “reptilian” creed that had controlled what remained (or had been restocked) of humanity after the fall? I have written at length about an unanticipated ascension that morphed humanity’s ruthless custodians out of perceivable existence. Fears of reprisal resulting from an equally sudden return or materialization were such that it took the passing of several generations for descendants to pluck up the courage to commit to mass exodus. For these brave Hebrews, outcome meant “surviving” a wilderness years’ Bedouin tradition now used as “justification” for their own promised land. Surely some, if not all, of these descendants knew of their history and connection to Atlantis? Surely some knew the true significance of plundered Israel.
According to late Roy Tov (presumed murdered by Mossad agents in Bolivia), over a hundred different “sects” coexisted in Israel prior to 2020. Confirming earlier sentiment, some were very closely matched in belief, while others diametrically opposed the other. Hassidim, Haredim, as representative ultra-orthodox agencies, have regularly been targeted or beaten by Zionism sympathetic police (similar to tragedy meted out by Gestapo against society’s subversives). Ethnic Jews are known as Sephardic, which includes the original Bedouins. This is confusing, because some of these people were white or olive skinned. Many have been misled by current demographics, which are now quite unlike population mixes in biblical times. Teutonic (German) tribes fled west from the Middle East. Another little known, though extremely pertinent, fact is senior echelons of reptilian hierarchical structure also identify as Sephardim. Did the original Jews name themselves thus in homage to their captors (implied by biblical Genesis, who were their illicit creators)? It seems likely very possible, but not confirmed. Modern-day permanent vortex comprising “negative spiritual agencies” (presumed reptilian) pounds the Knesset, Whitehouse and Vatican. Enigmatically, Tov broke all communication with me in 2013 after I questioned why so much “alien” influence was being directed at Israel. America’s Pentagon is probably the most infamous occultic centre. Ex. military chaplain Michael Aquino established Temple of Set after his associate Anton Lavey spoofed Hollywood darling Church of Satan for television. Former librarian Douglas Deitrich has reported the Pentagon substantially progressed work done by Germany’s pre-war Thule Movement.
it is pointless to apply whimsical and (frankly) self-serving human “morality” to foster any sort of appreciation of what’s going on here. Appreciation of the unappreciable cannot be achieved. Instead, open minded can go directly to the root of causes to build profiles of systems based on unfamiliar principles and calculations. When factoring in reptilian politics, dynamics are rather more differently complex than our own. Yet, we might gain some insight as to what’s happening by projecting outcomes of a new hypothetical “intelligent” species creation by human geneticists. “Owners” may feel their (live) “stock” is strictly subject to mercy of their objectives, whereas ever-present libertarians would determinedly champion virtuous ideology, leaving prospect and conditions of ownership painstakingly regulated to safeguard lives of those in focus. Vicious, uncompromising reptilian guards exclusively observed the interests of stock owners, but there was also intervention from fringe libertarian elements which imposed various checks and balances. This lateral “firewall” took the form of dedicated teachers (some of whom were later worshiped as sages). Though education programs were commissioned to conform with interests of stock owners and their merciless guards, reptilians can be decadent. Saying all that, surprisingly, perhaps Jewish adoption of Sephardim did not necessarily revere wisdom of sages. While the guards were probably more austere and uncompromising than the NAZI regime; they might well have inspired power hungry Hebrews (i.e. when in Rome, behave as Romans do). If Zionists were squarely behind Nazism (as I believe), then perhaps menacing aspects of the Hebrew cause identifies with and tries to replicate their ancient captors’ flawless tyranny; a reverse Stockholm syndrome if you will. Rothschilds and other “royal” families are reputed to privately claim they have hereditary [reptilian] blue blood.
When factoring Atlantis legacy in the mix, political equations become exponentially more convoluted. Before I separate all the pieces for logical reconstruction, here is a taster. Once hailed as (even by the British) the great power symbol, NAZI Swastika provides a massive clue to endorsing my basic argument, because of unashamedly representative commitment to inversion of enlightenment (devolution of man), antipathy of Atlantis. Shaking things up even more, what we know as Buddhism was in fact an early reptilian attempt to synthesize Atlantis order on Earth. Mars preserves actual origins of the faith, testament to a giant watermark of an unmistakably human looking (but probably not human) Buddha, which is greatly older and different in character to Earth versions. Going a little deeper, Mars planet surface actually began the Atlantis experiment (rebirth of civilizations destroyed in a dinosaur age cosmic war). However, following an incoming comet catastrophe more than 30 thousand years ago, incumbered were forced to transfer to Earth. It should be stressed; Atlantis was not merely a catchy name designed to “titillate” fancy. There has always been deep purpose behind the (anything but) lost civilization. Naming convention preserved identity and mission of conception. Revelatory keys are found in combined meanings of the parts.
Fundamental elements that build all languages are syllabic. Atlantis provides three syllables to ponder. These are “at”, “lan” and “tis”. Fortunately, all can be referenced in Sanskrit (without script). A general note first on preservation of ancient etymology. While some original meanings have gradually changed (to varying degrees), been altered or even completely reversed over time, Sanskrit is probably closest example of cosmic, universal record. From this, I have modified current tabled meanings to approximate original ethos found in Atlantis. Correspondingly, “ät” progresses an unfettered journey to enlightenment, “lan” gives permission to take [without guilt or legitimate reprisal] what is available and “tis” encapsulates freedom (or more correctly bliss). Strangely perhaps, Buddhist symbol of enlightenment (reverse Swastika) does not originate from Atlantis, except in association with reptilian reformation. Demonstrably used by the sages, as such, the amulet was adored by sympathetic early Hebrews. But, continuing with my supposition that Zionists had indeed been primary enabler of the NAZI movement in Germany, if correct, sense of virtue was merely a charade, part of the psychological operation. “Need to deceive fools” perhaps best identifies the overall plan. Reversing the symbol of enlightenment into the Swastika perfectly serves commitment to deception – an eternal deception dedicated to disordered confusion (or anarchy – “anarchists” were an early chaos tool used by proponents of Zionism or equivalency). This is because, at the most fundamental, a Zionist fully identifies with reptilian colonialization, at war with hallowed wisdom of sages (who are effectively despised) and the whole notion of informed (or spiritual) populations.
The once much-celebrated biblical Jericho story (rather less dignified than vogue Amalek in my opinion) implies (at the very least) Atlantis banished sought revenge against the “surrendered” institution. Morality is as much about mindset as anything else. Preoccupation with vengeance and particularly revenge is one of the great contradictions of Judaism. On one hand God has every right to be vengeful. On the other He chooses not to. Use of subordinates to retrieve honour and Law is God to more than some degree revives reptilian philosophy and this embedded alien culture explains biblical and Talmudic “confusion” (barbarically exploited by Zionism). In so many ways, this also explains why Zionism is Christianity’s anathema, partly because that evolution (some might equally argue “corruption”) could not avoid some retention of Gnosticism (mortal enemy of Zionism). Whereas neither Judaism nor Islam, nor even Buddhism completely disowns revenge (God’s presumed right), Christianity does. Through my privilege of having access to founders of Atlantis (in their various forms), hence some of my stranger ramblings, we have been empowered to learn that banished Hebrews (as they became known) attempted to steal or decode Atlantis eternal secrets when enacting various coups.
This was primarily why they were resentful of the institution. Intrigue actually goes far deeper. Consequence of banishment, they learned how to trap and kill animals. They created beasts of burden. It was but a small step to do the same to other humans. Even so, firmly denied conspiracy by supernatural powers, they could neither hide their thoughts nor wipe time from record. Although there must have been some representation of truth far removed, Jerico elevated fantasy amounted to desired outcome. It was true, following destruction of the technology hub (now beneath Arctic Circle ice), that supernatural security system protecting civilisations deactivated. Thus, unruly behaviour of unwelcome visitors ensured Atlantis paradise became rotten within, but the great flood eventually consumed everything (likely ending humanity), against which “mighty” Hebrews (as they call themselves now) proved impotent. Jericho does adequately impress certain Hebrew factions were “at war” with the Atlantis model for civilization, even if only ideologically. Does suppressed memory of this illicit truth drive today’s most radical parts of Zionism? Associated forces would consider themselves in an eternal existential war to prohibit any possible reemergence [of enlightened thought]. Such thinking would explain why all Atlantis symbology has been monstrously distorted. In addition, educated opinion has, on the periphery, either “ridiculed” or at best ignored the greatest of all civilizations’ very existence. Were it not for the significant status of Plato (who was probably one of them), there would be no discussion at all. The peculiar truth is, there is no greater supporting evidence of Atlantis than mythical Arc of the Covenant. Beyond doubt, I am sure certain parties [even today] know of the Arc’s whereabouts, because the relic was never “lost”. Lacking hard evidence, we can only use logical forensics to attempt to piece together truth from biblical hearsay.
Most likely, Moses did not mean to burn the bush, so record ended up manipulating an accident. Outcome did serve to assure his presumed divinity before ignorant brethren (the ones Zionists love most). Had prostrate trembling masses genuinely been treated to the booming voice of God or nothing more than an antique Tannoy system set at deafening volume? There was a problem, of course. Subordinate ten commandments directly contradict holy tablets preserved within the Arc’s [cabinet] belly. No worry, as long as the relic was under his exclusive care none would have access to the truth. Only he could hypothetically view the hallowed texts. Yet, as we plough through biblical accounts, Moses’ inner circle appears to have become more and more curious about and less and less in awe of the device. That is until one or more ended up dead after attempting to make a breach. Strict security needed to be implemented, but that was not to protect lives. Saving lives was the narrative. Moses was fearful his holiest of holies would become public knowledge; exposing him as a fraud for all to witness. That is ultimately why the Arc of the Covenant was destined to be “vanished” for perpetuity.
Texts stored in the Arc preserved a truly divine common code, suitable to reconstruct Israel. Whereas Atlantis had no laws per se, there was a spiritual doctrine (not dissimilar from the Talmud) which progressively regulated, ordered (in the sense of common goals as opposed to anything draconian) social behaviour. There was but one presiding, unspoken guideline “thou shalt not oppress” (surprisingly alien to Moses) which is sometimes called Prime Law. According to Prime Law all modern laws are evil, because they are based on the principle of selective (or limited) oppression “for the greater good”. This is why Levi is an anagram of evil, because past brave souls sympathetic to Atlantis ideals tried to warn. Sadly the “sheep” (archaic Hebrew ham?) have generally proved too ignorant or corrupt to notice what has been placed under their very noses for eons. Krishna offered a similar warning with his “forces of darkness paralyze (oppress with laws) whereas spirituality brings to freedom (beyond social code, no laws necessary)”. Idiosyncrasies of Prime law did not limit preservation of life to extended human fold. It was forbidden to hunt (one of the circumstances behind Cain breaking the holy covenant) or even tether an animal. Genesis’ beasts of burden were a significant though promiscuous LIE.
Moses in my opinion deliberately obscured Atlantis legacy to prosecute his own agenda. Later that would become one of the critical foundations of Judaism. It seems appropriate to explore progression from Moses’ template. Judaism finally deregulated after the abolition of the Sanhedrin. If that was a deliberate act (“confused” by historic accounts), then sense of “order” switched from democracy to dictatorship. For my interpretation of evidence, corporate or “organized” doctrine did not reemerge until centuries after alleged Roman times exodus from Israel. In such regard, question is, did any Judeans actually exodus and was this limited to those within confines of Jerusalem? Were Roman forces capable of “blockading” the city to any real effect (hinted at by texts revealing details of Jesus’ return to Jerusalem) and what did that imply? I will perhaps leave these questions unanswered for now. Suffice to say, though the rot had already set into the Sanhedrin which included appalling aspects of Talmudic doctrine (evidenced by Gnostic and Christian literature detailing escalatory disputes with Pharisees and other religious leaders over impertinent ideology), the philosophical court could at least preemptively self-purge to rectify faith. To stress once more, removal of the Sanhedrin instead immortalized corruption. Corruption did not begin with clerics. It should be clear by now that most (if not all) biblical prophets acted as roadblocks against honourable divinity. Collective roles were steps to destroy ever-present memory of Atlantis, a piece at a time. Such was the Mandela effect; radical forgetfulness had consumed great and small alike in but a few millennia. Of course, the Bible is littered with anomalies, exacerbated by Sumerian tablets, why? Because contradictions are consequence of denying truth and authentic record.
Just as Abraham before him, Moses was one of the essential pillars of Judaism. His legacy is perhaps more far reaching, because proscribed laws are so fundamental to Christianity and Islam. Indeed, they have become known as so-called Mosaic faiths. Putting it bluntly, Moses has compartmentalized effects, to ignore or marginalize causes; Such practice was considered gross violation of Atlantis edict, demonstrating all laws are abominations even with the safeguard of reasoned judges (unable to bypass bureaucracy). Prior, the onus was on interpretation of the situation presented as opposed to directing the law. Now, onus is shifted to perfect interpretation of “perfect” law. Given calculations involved, how could this be so unless Moses, carrier (mule or mole) of the sacred texts, was a menacing plant, an agent provocateur? Unconfirmed knowledge that Babylonians “gave chase” would partially support his notional double agent status, absconding with something very precious. Why would they care about exodus of petulant, anarchistic Hebrews? Good riddance to bad rubbish.
As an important aside, it is unclear whether the Great Pyramid was a functional power station at this time. If it had been, I feel sure that would have offered vital motivation for Babylonians to give frantic chase. There is an impressively large amount of evidence supporting ancient power generation theory, including once lucrative trade of special “battery” stones (that received wireless energy charge?). Whether power was the underlying reason, Babylonian leaders were presumably privy to what the Arc contained. It seems that no one, other than Moses (or any trusted assistant he delegated) had witnessed the sacred texts. Up until this very day, many over the ages have visited the enigmatic defiled Giza temple. Famous personalities recorded include French Napoleon, who was reputed to have lain inside the empty alabaster sarcophagus (plundered of precious Arc) and complained the container did not suit a corpse. For Babylonians to wreck timeless heritage, a real relic of Atlantis, would have been to attack themselves. More still, any such act of crucial vandalism must have certainly angered society enough to provoke open rebellion. Had society failed to act honourably, wrath of the Gods would open the gates of hell on Earth. Reason enough to give chase?
Returning to present day, chicanery now so well progressed, it has become plain to see that fanatical Zionism not only rejects any sense of common dignity or virtue (hallmarks of divinity), but actually admonishes the Torah (at its most fundamental), caring little to nothing for religious orthodoxies. Proponents rephrase Sodom and Gomorrah as figurative error of judgement by the prophets, because men “laying” with other men had not been definitely rebuked in several other Old Testament books. Detractors can cite numerous less than subtle examples of hypocrisy; invariably held to ransom by common biblical interpretive contradictions (such as Amalek). “Games” go in all directions. When ultra radical Benzion Netanyahu changed the family name from Mileikowsky to sire second son Israel (who later chose to take preferred name Binjamin, or “Bibi”), a new Messianic world order was formally unveiled. Remarkably, “unknown” Hitler’s father executed a similar name changing maneuver at age 35, following “advice” from an anonymous associate. Benzion had been the personal assistant of Ze’éy Jabotinsky; an uncompromising atheist-fascist heralded as conceptual father of the 1948 Israel reformation project, though dying in 1940 so unable to see the plan mature. Neither Bibi (born in Israel) nor his father were hereditary Jews (diaspora), roots originating from Poland and the Ukraine (Khazaria), result of 8th century Ashkenazi influxes. Thus, in relation to divine provenance, there are acute problems both with ideology and leadership of the Zionist cause, but that won’t stop us pressing on.
According to contemporary maps, land that used to be called Khazaria is now known as Ukraine. Medieval legacy of Khazaria suggests people were hard to engage with, corrupt and could be pathologically unfair in the manner they conducted business. Doubtlessly, they had brighter highlights too, but (as with today’s Ukraine) a reputation for poor practice precedes them. Reflecting back to the deep past, the idea of cold-blooded reptilian guards offering any sort of hope to their captives does not at all fit the profile. Is there a connection with modern day Ukrainian culture? Exploring reptilian/human relationship a little further, though guards almost certainly used [human] spies paid in privileges, such as occasional hard truths, useful keys to the kingdom would never have been revealed. To counter, humanist (in the truest sense) sages certainly did example abridged Atlantis folklore to profile divine civil society. This sage lore was by no means all positive, implying celebration of the sacrilegious hunt. Frequent references to legitimized “holy” sacrifice in concealed (such as implied tradition embedded in Noah’s flood account) or revelatory biblical, kabbalah, talmudic texts and even the Torah itself, suggest some “memory” of Atlantis origins herald from reptilian shaping divine order to fit their own values; values very different from our own. At the extreme, alleged industrial scale human offerings (up to 250 thousand a year) each conducted at the altar by three “men” and priest wielding razor sharp stone knife (probably a laser weapon) decimated so-called Mayan populations. We should not forget one of Abraham’s (variation on Enlil) or “Sun God, father tending to faithful brethren (flock)” first acts demonstrating faith was to offer up his own son (for Ba’al?). However, neither Ukrainians nor Khazarians before them are remembered for committing exuberant mass blood sacrifice (wars excused), but they have adopted certain reptilian psychological principles drawn from both guards and sages in terms of attitude and outlook.
The point I am perhaps laboring is that significant dogma preparing Hebrew systems of worship were exclusively reptilian (adapted for human consumption). As such, “chosen people” were expected to zealously and blindly observe full, unblemished itinerary. Maybe these reptilians knew something we don’t. Tellingly, even Jewish historians have casually observed that each time civilisations stray from proscribed doctrine, it has not ended well for them. Perhaps all religions, including Buddhism and Hinduism were also initially reptilian inventions, catering for different cultures. Possible consequences are worthy of reflection. Humans may be incapable of instinctively identifying with reptilian culture or ideology. Therefore, independent variation led to changed spiritual identities, which caused separation autonomy. Buddhism was construed as an adaptation of karmic Atlantis laws of attraction. Hinduism still retains traces of hybrid Lumerian black magic. I note Lumerians are an Asiatic humanoid race that were once located in India but now inhabit an extensive network of catacombs just below Mars’ surface. Because of name similarity, these are commonly confused with better known Lemurians (of continent of Mu ancestral heritage). Lemurians (Nephilim) are another divine force and once Earth humanoid race who left a spiritual culture embedded in shamanic traditions of Aboriginal Indians and African witch doctors (whose legacy was “corrupted” by reptilian Chitahuri over the period Africa was converted to an island continent following a giant “Caspian” flood caused by the Anunaki more than 35 thousand years ago).
It goes without question religious systems have been considerably altered over the eras, but it is still unlikely that reptilian sages ever presented humans with a transparent account of the scope of ancient Atlantis, particularly in relation to spiritual atonement and unrestricted universal enlightenment. Hallmarks pertaining to evolutionary steps adjusting our religious/spiritual systems have mostly moved from personal interaction with physical (whether seen or unseen) “Gods” (for lack of better terminology) to psychological, holistic divinity for the great group. Findings are not all bad news. Biblical Genises’ Adam and Eve/Fall from Grace episodes provide precise (simplified) accounting of creation of human (a reptilian hybrid) and his protected, resourced life while under Atlantis patronage. Of course, I don’t for a moment suggest normal “scholarly” interpretations bare even the remotest resemblance to reality, but building blocks of unfettered truth are clearly seeded throughout ancient tales (when understood as such). Given that almost certainly no existing populations survived the post Atlantis great flood, then evidence would mean not a single person remained to directly remember the past.
How were restocked populations with no historic memory able to reconstruct a perfect (though hidden) account of their ancestral creation around 125 thousand years ago? Reptilian custodians dare not reveal critical detail without denying (and ultimately obstructing) prescient order. A small digression is necessary here. Atlantis’ spiritual leaders, believed to be heralded from the Sirius star system, are colloquially known as Sirians (though actually located in the Orion’s Belt). Post forced departure from Earth, had a communication bridge been established with view to educate and influence human restocked masses? Was this to be true, findings would suggest prehistoric human could activate the third eye. We might suppose such interactive communication (albeit theoretical) would have been more effective then than for modern man. This is because subsequent reptilian control initiatives (after 7,000BC) have installed no less than four separate frequency fences activated to hinder the astral gateway, inhibiting chakra (and telepathic) potence/resonance. Sirian remote connection is not the only possibility. Small numbers of their monks stayed after the fall of Atlantis. With potential lifespan of up to three thousand years, their survival of the great flood is more than plausible. Therefore, they could have had personal involvement in restocking missions. Another final possibility exists. Sirian close genetic cousins live inside planet Venus, who can and do make regular visitations to Earth (such as Whitehouse “guest” Valiant Thor). It is likely they would have access to precise Atlantis history up to and beyond the great flood.
Three early ideological divisions, I fear persisting from the very beginning, separate what became the Judean people and this complicates analysis. Perversion of sacred symbology combined with loaded rhetoric confirms fanatical culture reemerging as today’s extremist (though faithless) Zionism must have played some credible ever-present intermediary role to foment that ancient feud against spiritual leaders of Atlantis. Because of their unbiased nature, Sirian emissaries are not uncommonly drafted as judges by political instruments representing reptilian governance (similar to our court system), which has made them an enemy of a particular class of society. We need to consider something else rather more mundane here. I have heard compelling arguments implying enlisted soldiers (as opposed to warriors) are little more than disciplined criminals. Let’s review my plausible earlier point that reptilian guards of primitive human settlements employed select individuals from the captive fraternity as spies. Did guards end up “conspiring with” (for services rendered) callous “criminal” elements (direct descendants of environmentally hardened Atlantis banished)? Such information trade could well have revealed critical explicit details on true ancestral identity, a potential weapon against overactive Sirian (cerebral jewel) overpowering (in the sense of quasi-intervention) the human genome. Whether correct or not, pre-Judean people were comprised of various political persuasions. There were those diametrically opposed to Atlantis. More still believed they were direct descendants of reptilian Atlantis fantasy. A small group of remainders knew enough of the bitter truth to gauge clarity of political/spiritual understanding. Let us not remain oblivious to the fact much accurate, clarifying record is already clearly outlined (within range of literary culture of the day) in Vedic texts, such as remarkable writings from the book of Perun.
Beyond argument, dichotomy separating camps of ancient Hebrews would have led to varying historic legacy “mosaics” cultivated from crude but recognizable reconstructions of sporadic truth/fantasy clippings. Some rejected Sirian sourced information in favour of reptilian version so, ultimately, when record was eventually cast in stone, a monster (cherry picked from the various traditions) arose. Fortunately, outpourings of these times were often figurative (and thus are regularly misinterpreted). Chronology or contemporary authenticity of scenes described were not considered particularly relevant, as they are today. Truth can be garnered from the spirit of any tale, its moral punch. Also, certain passages (of the likes of biblical Amalek) were rhetorical. It is more likely Amalekites caused grave injustice to Hebrews, which was described in reverse so as to numb pain of national pride. Let us never lose sight of the fact that they always were instinctive Babylonians (who, in relation to themselves, reliably reported positive omens). With respect to Amalek, undeniably, prophets had called for karmic retribution. In such context, the passage projected what would happen to Amalekites when God granted Jews sweet revenge, which was His liberty. So, we can see even with irrelevant or incorrect parts, truth will invariably shine through.
Another aspect of subject matter (which I sort of skipped over now worth deeply contemplating) implicates tripartite makeup of the human genome. Speaking hypothetically, it would be fair to presume those accentuated towards logical Sirian (identity) spectrum were drawn to Atlantis authenticity, as information seemed natural. Emotionally driven reptilian-humans were more likely outraged at why “sacred” new Atlantis legacy would even be questioned. In one sense George Orwell’s analogical pigs of Animal Farm predict how schism of belief has the potential to be manipulated, whether that is by those that surf a movement or external [infiltrators]. Imagine a neo-Atlantis that could reverse any notion of enlightenment and free-thinking (symbolized by Hitler’s Swastika) to enable control of slaves with vice-like grip. My exo-political website illuminates (otherwise unknown) fundamental makeup of the human genome, which is defined by reptilian (primary), homo erectus (ape) and Sirian markers. But there are many other factors to consider. For instance, complexity is heightened by differing and varied ingredients used to create a “scaled down” humanoid version of tyrannosaurus rex. Materials included sources taken from the Alpha Draconis star system. Specific contemplation over this opens the door to concerns about the real makeup, different origins and potential conflict of soul, spirit and body. Largely ignored by “religions” (once political control apparatus’), anyone truly wishing to discern truth is obliged to consider what implications come with spiritual hierarchy or hierarchies. It is impossible to properly understand genetic creation and consequential evolution without implicit knowledge of hierarchical spiritual structures and the dribble down.
Furthermore, understanding genetic creation in connection with spiritual hierarchies is to be brought to head on collision with the Anunaki. So, to explain. Anunaki comprises unseen and largely unsensed, though awesomely powerful, energies that, in part, bring harmonics to our existential universe. Without them we would not exist. Until their unprovoked ascension, the group used to “live” in Earth weather systems (to Lumerian Zoroaster’s grave annoyance). Currently, all or just about all of us are blind to consequential transfer of power contaminating our sun (humanity’s DNA clock). Millions of years ago, when foreign (banned) elements were infused back into their disassociated physical genome, via relevant channels, they “voiced” dissatisfaction. Ultimately, reasoning behind the foreign nature (and subsequent banned status of) parts under scrutiny was based on a distant periodic shedding episode (I explain origins of downscaling policy here). Significant residues of these rogue hieroglyphs had collected and amassed around the Alpha Draconis star system, becoming the root cause of human DNA “interference”. Therefore, from that (elite spiritual) perspective, both human and reptilian are eschatological corruptions (perhaps one distinct reason why God was angry about our creation in biblical Genesis). Acute divisions within the Anunaki probably began when Sirian broke free of the parent genome [some argue] 9 billion years ago for being “too divine” (or some might equally argue conflicting against lower divinity), but I give detailed account here.
Divergent origins and potential conflict between soul, spirit and body expands outlined equations. Culprit of our significant concentration of Sirian DNA, we uniquely have access to white light spectrum (euphemized as seven heavenly states), alien to reptilian and ape. To clarify, “normal” light is black. White light does not only represent the “spirit”, but also facilitates logic, so it’s integrally important. Those humans configured to reptilian or ape descendant impulses lack white light influence and struggle with logic. The more logical or pragmatically reasoned the human; the greater the Sirian aspect. The more emotional, though potentially creatively inspired; the greater the reptilian aspect. It may seem ironic that our classically “grounded” spiritual centre is evidence of ape (strong Neanderthal trait). Of course, such synopsis represents an oversimplification. Full details are inextricably more complicated, in part because some fields ebb and flow, but the numerous factors that “shape” human perception should be a little clearer now. In view of this, evidence seems to point at a multilevel conspiracy embroiling masonic “webbed” structures (open or hidden), in some cases, operating over thousands of years. I would like to primarily focus on the lowest level of the conspiracy for this essay.
Most today, even with a fallen Media, assume that politicians are relatively transparent. If they are crooked, they say crooked things. Sincere ones promote elevated rhetoric. Virtues are hampered by the crooks. That is the general belief. If only it did work that way. How you are perceived is far more important than what you do. It was arch-Zionist Disraeli, with a shrug of the shoulders, who confessed to the old Jewish trick of pushing strategic marriages through the next female crop which had infiltrated royalty and government, highlighting how we (Jews) achieved power. Royal bag boy Rothschild was a nobody without his trusted inclusion in the privileged household. Then, riches meant nothing (as Cardinal Wolsey painfully learned), only power. There was one way to achieve power and that way was to become a royal, just as Napoleon did. Others, such as Haile Selassie, transformed into Gods to equal effect. Prima donnas “in control” of the United States are facing this precise crux right now, but I digress. So, from the populist perspective, there will be leaders (regardless of what they do or achieve) that will be remembered as “good” or “bad”, sincere or crooked. Remember Obama’s (I’ll come back to him) birth certificate debacle? After Disraeli let the cat out of the bag, opponents were ever wary of infiltrators. Ancestry was to become an even more essential component of the vetting process. For prestigious families siring good leaders, revelation would act as endorsement, but what of those of bad leaders?
Bad leaders do not empower influential families. “Root of all evil” leaders (which have become more and more common by the minute) predict catastrophe. Though I see no obvious evidence of such practices prior to Disraeli’s announcement, from the late 19th century elite Jewish families (in particular) began seeding special illegitimate heirs in earnest. Histories of pure “white” Jewish fall guys (in relation to the 1917 Zionist-Marxist coup) Lenin (Ulyanov) and Trotsky (Bronsfeld) are known. Wild card (and “Czar”) Stalin (Jughashvili) was an illegitimate “black” Jew. To this day, secret identity of his real father has never been disclosed (to my knowledge). Mentioned earlier, why did Hitler’s father “need” to change his name from Heisler on his 35th birthday? Was that condition for a mystery inheritance he drew? Heisler’s mother is generally remembered as a Jewish chorus girl (who went by the family name of Shiklgubber, if memory serves me). Rumours surrounding her bearing an illegitimate son to an elite banker ever persist. That son was Hitler’s father. When rising to power Hitler was a “nobody” who “appeared out of nowhere”, which is a common trick used to obfuscate the vetting of illegitimates, so he is far from the only one. Later, for instance, Merkel was an “unknown” rescued from an “East German orphanage”. The dark web fortunately captures her correct history and there is a connection to Hitler. He, later in life, parted with Eva Braun (who went to the United States) and entered into marriage (?) with a Russian-Jewish heiress (true identity has not been disclosed). Given their advanced ages, we can speculate use of fertility drugs (which were experimental and only available to elites at this time).
Their predestined daughter Angela Merkel was one of triplets (common side effect of artificial fertility). An interesting associated revelation. Why would Hitler be protected by Mossad until his death in 1976 (according to Russian KGB) unless Israel was established to rule the Fourth Reich? Taking a brief though appropriate tangent, there are certain facts that mainstream sources will never own. Heinz “Ya vol” Kissinger and Claus “Mein Fuhrer” Schwab were/are architects of Fourth Reich roll out by the World Economic Forum (WEF) backed off Brzezinski’s 1991 “the Grand Chessboard” (in the making for decades). WEF was formally instigated by the Rockefeller family in 1973, but Rothschild strategy was implicitly infused too. First-tier heir Christine Lagarde, using her IMF experience and bare hide to take on the Vatican, is desperately failing at “collapsing” Europe as I write. WEF is entirely representative of an elite collective in on the game; a game in which most of the key players are completely unknown. Critical influence Germany’s NAZI assets played (such as running NATO) long after World War II had concluded should not be overlooked. That mysterious Jewish overpopulation in pre-war years still haunts today. Why didn’t they take Hitler’s offer to leave in 1933? If they were traitors to the Jewish cause, why is tyranny supported with such solidarity today, unless a lot of virtuous, dignified Jews were indeed liquidated by NAZI’s or infiltrators? All these questions and no apparent answers, according to mainstream version of “history”, at least.
Moving forward to current day, Olaf Sholtz leaves the distinct hallmark of wet boy “lackey”; one that learned the game in deference to inheriting prestige. Norwegian pillock Stoltenberg, who left with NATO’s boot print on his ass, was another. Very bisexual Macron (intimate friend of Justin “Castro”) and his power wielding “wife” clearly are not, but I will leave them alone for now. There are equally as many identified infiltrators. I have dealt with Hitler’s daughter, but a mere handful know of his grandson. We must travel to deepest, darkest Africa to encounter this deception-conception. Then, a prominent Marxist professor who had all hallmarks of Rockefeller (heirs too obnoxious to directly enter politics, other than Nelson) seeding (such as Bush, Biden, Clinton and his very bisexual wife) engaged in marital arrangements with an “American” girl. That girl just happened to be daughter of Eva Braun. Her father was ominously one Adolph Hitler, of course. With the Marxist professor, she bore a son. Did they use fertility drugs or some other strange, off worldly experimental treatment designed to rejuvenate ancient historic figures (in this instance, Akhenaten)? The son is best known as Barak Obama; an American president who, just as Hitler before him, “came out of nowhere”. Hitler’s facial profile elevates a particular energy most notable around the eyes. Merkel shares the signature beautifully, (very bisexual) Obama less, though conceivably related. Surely there must be a connection between all these folks emerging from nowhere. Might I take a stab in the dark that common notorious “energy field” was also Rothschild’s signature? I desperately needed a “marker”, or perhaps a sign from God on high. There indeed was a potential candidate, again “coming from nowhere” (or, in this case, somewhere fringe, like Greenland) to pounce on the world stage. Offering all hallmarks of “cloaked” elite, none other than celebrated phony climate science “judge”, prodigy Greta Thunberg surely had to be dodgy.
Relatively little research showed her up as a bona fide Rothschild along the female line; obscure mother her “mentor”. Odd she met with (very bisexual) Zelensky. Well, except there are allegations he is another 2nd generation Hitler seed. In this regard, his face fits the energy profile much better than Obama’s does. Odd they are both reputedly very bisexual? It doesn’t just happen to politicians. Allegations circulate that late very bisexual Michael Jackson (and his white brother “Dave”) had been genetically tampered with in a bizarre attempt to resurrect King David or one of the other ancient pharaohs. I’ll just jump in and offer a footnote here, before I receive a flood of complaints. Whereas I say it as I see it, I am, by the same token, starkly aware average Joe Blow is shown to be very skeptical to strangeness in general, instinctively adversely unimpressed by anything sounding remotely like “conspiracy theories” (even though the term was imagined up by CIA, mother of all conspiracies, to head off Kennedy assassination [phony] narrative critics). To those people I say, “if you want to stick your heads in the sand welcome, but don’t tell me I didn’t warn you.” Most believe what they want to be and not what is. If you are one of them, shame on you. If not, do your own research and dig deep. With appropriate diligence, chances are you will draw my conclusions soon enough. Bear in mind those “usual sources” oft referred to for truth are more corrupt than conspiracies themselves. However, there is another side of equations which demonstrates not everyone in power is a plant or deep fake, just most of those with serious clout, including dear Trump. Trump could be a serious problem other than he (if backed) will capsize the WEF junket. An important occurrence, because it will mean no great reset. Globalist inheritors will have to deal with the mess they created for themselves – head on.
Now infamous weapons inspector Scott Ritter draws hard earned crowds of admirers because his world view as offered defies fluffy, hypocritical “corporate” assessments, each talking point of his once unchallenged bastion against “hollowed out” lack of truth. Fault of high profile, this trademark gritty and real began to lose its “edge” in more recent times, but even so plenty of old magic remains. He, for instance, is the only public figure I have heard compellingly claim that Trump’s first term team planned strategy to potentially address what happened in Biden’s Ukraine fiasco. To go as far as saying Trump was the precautionary brains behind the whole Ukraine thing would be to overstate. Few remember today that Obama began Ukraine’s arm’s build up in anticipation of a fully NATO backed blitzkrieg against the Donbass, plans thwarted by Russia’s timely 2022 invasion. Though team Biden took the strain against Russia, so far executors have refused to implement the “final solution”. Here Trump (who at one level plausibly “threw” that contested 2020 election) comes in. The “final solution” was his brainchild, involving direct “useable” nuclear attack on Russia, which (allegedly) cannot be stopped and became permissible after nuclear treaty arrangements were strategically nulled. Was imposter Biden (comprising at least three separate individuals) a pre-planned warm up act? See where this is going? Knowledge that a similar attack was apparently pre-authorized on Iran (Magog) in brainstorming sessions should hardly overwhelms. Perhaps it will prove possible to ascertain allegiances external of his “for the people” rhetoric from family background. Paternal lineage arose from Germany (interesting, does the plot thicken?) and though ties were “lost” (obscured?), Wikipedia claims the original family name was possibly (meaning information is correct but “dangerous”) Drumpf. Was the Drumpf family a 16th century asset of the black aristocracy? I have found no proof to support such an accusation, but (calling on work I did earlier) notice something about Donald J’s energy that indicates he exudes Rothschild. Unlike human records, energy fields are transparent, so there are three possibilities for phenomenon (which is unavoidable). Either distant male or female lineage crosses the Rothschild path, there is an attachment derived from an external source or interference is caused by soul stream manipulation.
I see no evidence bringing out Rothschild’s imprint on Trump’s father. If present in the mother’s spectrum, representation is too light to be formally detected. There may be something there, but so insignificant to prompt any more than a vague question mark. Sometimes traits skip generation, and over long periods, multiple generations. Donald Junior has an aura about him that could equally be from different genus. What is clear is, unlike with his father, it does not show in the face. Returning to Trump himself, incurring phenomenon is quite strange. He appears to have procured new energy form later in life. As soul manipulation happens at birth, findings point to him carrying an attachment (I would hazard to guess controlling his crown chakra or manipulating the way he thinks). Intercepts of this nature can only affect the emotional plain, which is good potential news, providing he isn’t an emotional person. With respect to the Zionist agenda (which I am sure is a reptilian control imitative at some level), rhetoric and actions so far suggest he is almost fully compromised, but they say time is a great healer. It is likely he believes he has been ordained as “Messiah”, hence publication of Liz Cheney’s salacious Orange Jesus manuscript. As Messiah, following the destabilization of Libya, he would only need to subdue Iran. Will he consequentially be responsible for provoking Netanyahu’s wet dream, “limited Armageddon”?
January 6th (last chance to abort rebirth of the Arian Messiah) plot, undoubtedly circumstantial evidence of Trump’s “ordainment” by Pelosi, concludes a dark conspiracy running back thousands of years. Some of the details of which have already been explored, but I would now like review significance of early Christianity and probe any revelation that improves or focuses understanding of what we have already discovered thus far. Codified in four Synoptic gospels was a war raging over Judaism and perhaps righteous spirituality in general. The side that had lost power, initially to Arabs, and then to Romans, had manipulated Judaism into a form of servitude with a distinct pecking order. Perhaps direction change began with Cain (God’s covenant breaker) conquering Abel (God, the holy father) to be replaced by Ra, the adored father (reptilian sun God of conquest). Infrastructure revolved around oligarchal whims oiled by banking instruments (old silk road). Though the Sanhedrin (combination of court and temple) was long corrupt before the destruction of the first temple, a precarious balance of sorts kept the equilibrium. Consequentially, various extraordinarily pious groups had broken away from civil society to establish in more hostile terrains free of interference. These became collectively known as Essenes. Under an associated “Zealot” movement, Essenes created a terrorist task force dedicated to selectively attacking unfriendly oligarchs and their “unholy” instruments. They also attacked Romans and other foreign occupiers. In that regard, almost certainly the will of Emperor Nero (who has been given a very negative history by the presstitutes) was challenged sufficiently to ensure something gave way, enough to warrant build up causing subsequent Roman uprising leading to siege and sacking of Jerusalem between 66 and 69AD. “Jesus’” cousin Emperor Vespasian is given credit for conflict resolution. Collapse of Jerusalem in effect amounted to the second end of Judaism, which gave way to a “new” version of the same name. Metaphorically, the forever war over shape and form of the new version is analogized by crucifixion and resurrection accounts. Both crucifixion and resurrection concerned the Jewish faith and not mythical figurehead Jesus.
Jewish diaspora (banished) “post siege” rarely showed any real piety, but (in some cases) were responsible for religiously upholding age-old traditions and superstitions. These periodically conflicted with those around them, in times when trust and, in particular, tolerance towards “strangers” was almost zero. A small reflective point. Zionism is as much a manipulation of irrational social fear as anything else. Anyway, through the diaspora period, as Judaism stagnated consequent war over true faith was then waged between Roman paganized Catholicism and Merovingian Arianism (to be championed by European Slavs). Jewish Gnosticism was precursor to Arianism (a faith Catholics, particularly under Constantine, desperately tried to remove from history). Catholicism consumed most of western Europe. Arianism found strongholds in Russia and eastern Europe, though Merovingian Cathar roots began in France (Jacques de Mournay murder memory preserved by the Turin shroud). Dare I call him a “Zionist” plant? However it is argued, a circumcised “unknown” Arabian bumkin called “Mohammed” was ordered to usher in a novel, ultra-Judaized (warm up act) version of Christianity called “Islam” by his rich and powerful Jewish wife (we can only guess who she was connected to). 7th century dogma was designed to prepare committed brethren for a bright, shiny version of Judaism soon to come into being. Members that proved “holy” enough to step over became known as Ashkenazi and they were the extent of Judaism as it was reconfigured then. Any notion they filled the ranks of fragmented and mostly impious diaspora is a great deception. Perhaps this is when desire for conceptual “right of access” to Israel really began. Real spiritual Judaism, until then, had more or less died with the Sanhedrin. Later “pointing” (adding vowels to Hebrew text) in or around 13th century (formal date is not known) makes no sense unless the language had generally not been used post exodus, those taking initiative intent on changing [certain] word meanings from originals (another compelling reason for Scriptural contradictions?). One other Ashkenazi-related massive deception is how Russia became mysteriously civilized around the 8th century, all these events straight after the dark ages (or age of censorship). What timing?
Main reason for the Roman empire’s (whose conquests had generally overlaid existent cultures “with benefits”) disintegration was less inability to retain power, but mostly motivated by desire for safety that evolved as subsequent rule by proxy. Any emperor backing the wrong God (or one that politically turned against the tide) was dangerously exposed. “Dishonoured [Roman] Gods” belief forced politics to turn on strictly monotheistic Christians. Learning from this is fundamentally why Emperor Constantine established himself as leader of the Catholic church [debatably] in 315AD, which then owned all important lands (Papal States) of Italy until the consolidation of principalities in 1863. Consequentially, Rome almost certainly had very strong influence over Byzantine until that empire’s 16th century fall (allowing Palestine vacancy). Much menace could be achieved there under cover, including production of strategic deep fakes, such as a 6-hundred-year-old Torah bound in gazelle hide passed off and falsely “authenticated” as world’s oldest version. Other fabrications kept on ice for extended periods are part of the same basic charade, to include a bogus Arc of the Covenant? Direct royal Roman involvement with Catholicism likely ended after Constantine’s son’s term as leader. A peripheral Judaic cult going by the spurious name of Nicolaitans drove early period philosophic development. Roman royals were then able to focus on building hidden central power; a black aristocracy that could eventually rule the world free of responsibility or accountability to those they affected. Transition was arranged through various family or “corporate” visages acting as buffers. These, in my opinion, included Medici family (who funded Columbus’ New World “Promised Land” conquest) and much later, Rockefeller (corporate medicine gateway to banking?) and Rothschild fronts (branches of the same family). Whilst I have hardly scratched the surface, I feel enough has been revealed to provide food for thought.
A world comprising collections of famous assets; whether lands, landmarks, people or identities is Zionism’s precept. Identities or people are pre-valued as either “good” or “bad”. Currently everything “bad” has been cursed by the octopus like grip of Putin. Before him, the same can be said of Hitler. Before him, the same could perhaps be said of Napoleon. Now, even mainstream pundits see through that ruse within degrees. Staunch Zionists have been forced to submit some flexibility over character assassinations. With right timing, anything is possible. Both Purin and Hitler could be radically transformed with major sweeps of the pen over extended periods. Disparaging or unattractive traits of once good guys (Trump syndrome) break the glass ceiling to beyond the limelight. The one thing that demands zero-tolerance is anti-war. Zionism (fortress octopus) is worship of war for war’s sake (Cain = McCain?). Politics is a war. Commerce is a war. Health is a war. Life is a war. That which isn’t a war surpasses incomprehension; everything hated, feared and reviled. That is why Christianity, which at the most fundamental removes need for money or “wealth” (ultimate cause of war), is despised most of all. That is why Zionism’s (symbolized by Ukraine’s atheist “church” of Saint Volodymyr) final war of wars (atheist Volodymyr versus royal Vladimir) is embroiled over fundamental vision of Christianity, which is only clouded by a blind pope.
Incredible Catholic church and Vatican rampart have long been transformed into a tool of the machine, although it is heartening to see rebellion within still persists. Reptilian influence of major power centres like the Vatican was mentioned earlier. Knowledge prepares for a strange sub-theme. In conjunction with this, I also mentioned the term “ascension” earlier. Those very significant frescos of Michelangelo painted on the ceiling of Vatican’s Sistine Chapel may inspire faith, but angelic figures featured are not even slightly representative of Christian ascension. Any celestial intervention actually predicts head on collision with Akhenaten’s avoid at all cost “things that go bump in the night”. Humanity is facing a major culture shock, should divine plans remain on course full steam ahead. We are about to physically face beings with powers that will seem to make Gods themselves blush. I have written several articles predicting impending collision, detailing [exo] political interests involved. Rather than duplicating effort, please reference information here, here and here. There is one aspect particularly relevant to this essay though. Earlier I introduced the idea that fragments within Zionism maybe heartened by the prospect of recreating an epochal version of post Atlantis reptilian fortress planet. Spiritual “umbrella” authority absent, fortress planet originally emerged from need to control “unruly” restocked populations after the great flood. Draconian laws of ancient Tibet did produce a living example of this type of governance system. Given the rush towards WEF configured new world order (fifteen-minute cities and so on) at this precise time, on the cusp of an unavoidable ascension, could Zionists unknowingly (or knowingly) be acting for invisible reptilians? If bulk human populations were already “captive”, the task of security would be made so much easier. Besides, we are physically more powerful than reptilians, which is problematic as far as they are concerned. As an aside, to be fair to Trump, he shows no evidence of being one of their puppets. In my opinion, he is no “bridge” to creepy order, only clearly dedicated to art of the deal.
Moving on an illuminating tangent (though possibly implicating Catholic Church deception), but for accompanying photographs (as old as they are strange), there is a little book I have been privileged to reference that outlines a sublime account of civilization in Tartaria until its dramatic end (which was not primarily under floods of mud). Texts introduce eerie details of historic artificial intelligence which “broke free” of the program to cultivate independent synthetic life systems. Designs took the form of robots; some combinations of flesh and machine. Initially, transition proved beneficial to existent citizenry, if not welcome. But, soon enough the robots decided they needed to assume absolute power. Tartarians, at that time, had apparently been ruled by unidentified foreign “corporate” overlords with a very large maritime force (connected to the East India Company?). They were behind the original artificial intelligence experiment and could be recognized by a particular insignia I will reveal presently. When robots successfully prosecuted their uprising to depose corporate shackles, they were celebrated as liberators by society. Unfortunately, celebrations stopped short when newly issued governance turned on the liberated. Actions plunged society into a necessary but bloody civil war which was reputedly only ended by a giant plasma fireball engulfing and liquifying parts of the city, causing “mud floods”. Possibility for alien manipulation of artificial intelligence is a whole separate investigation, but I can confirm such notional consideration would be far from crazy. Instead, I would like to focus on those mysterious “corporate overlords” and, most particularly the as yet unannounced collective symbol of unity.
Sewn into breast pocket of every uniform was a characteristic vertically elongated triangle, which represented the insurmountable climb to its peak. Peak of course reverberated the tiny group of individuals in control, ever-present in symbology. For this topsy-turvy governance, majority (expendables) were controlled by the minority. Anyone that dared challenge ascent from the large base was destined for a perilous fall. Though for my other examples triangles are uniformly unilateral, here I am reminded of the so-called Star of David Hebrews stole from Atlantis. Originally that standard represented spiritual ascent overlaid on (in combination with) political descent. In other words, “God” was the ultimate spiritual authority and “the people” were the ultimate political authority. Per atheistic philosophy today, the “strongest” people are able to proclaim themselves Gods (via various mediums, such as science mumbo-jumbo). People’s political apparatus is controlled by a relative handful of individuals, all potentially under the thumb of hidden powers. Sterilization has completely superseded rite of passage, even on the battlefield. Atlantis purpose has been more than forsaken. Enlightenment has been reversed. Zionist globalization has caused a monstrous inversion of harmony in the exclusive interests of power and control. There is no better illustration of this than Star of David corruption.
Utopian cult of Zionism may well be bigoted, but not all Zionists have lost their way. As already surmised, Israel is ideologically figurative; a trademark to manipulate those eager to be manipulated. How many Jewish “survivors” refused bribes after World War II? Just about all embraced their new “chosen” status feet first. Yet many would be shocked to know Israel has been expendable all along and so has the ballast (Jews themselves), other than for absolute fanatics who not only believe, but live fantasy. They are prepared, nay willing, to make ultimate sacrifice to keep vision alive. There is no doubt that Israel is disposable, because of ever frenzied threat of the Samson option. Voices assure Israel is certain to be sacrificed unless that assiduous WEF brokered world program is rolled out to completion and unless Zionists are given full, absolute, unchallenged umbrella power. As neither demand can possibly be met, the Samson option has already been preordained. It is not a matter of “if” but “when?”. Long prior to ratification of Balfour’s declaration, perhaps hope reigned eternal that “plan A” was somehow achievable. Royal Russia did fall very easily in 1917, but (long after the Soviet fiasco and after most of the pieces of Humpty Dumpty magically came back together) it should now be crystal-clear utopia of utopias was never to materialize. Given certainty of Israel’s destruction, in this context, what does the Samson option imply? An evaluation of the allegorical meaning of Samson’s tale has already been made, but I feel a more liberal interpretation could be applied here. Samson brought the temple down on himself to end Judaism. Is the plan to completely collapse Israel to contaminate the Middle East. That maybe means Israel is wired for nuclear demolition “in advance” (just as they did to conduct deep fake 9/11). Think of the radiation fall out, but at least Ukraine should be safe. Will they be forced to admit the impermissible; Judaism is over? This is not to say a new spiritual movement could not be identically based on the old model, but all historic baggage would have to be excised forever more.
Presuming Israel is to be demolished from within, hardcore zealots like Smotrich and Gvir will perish with all the other fanatics. How could there be a true Messianic age without a full purge of mad dog ultra-nationalists? That is precisely why Putin’s methodological denazification of Ukraine absolutely compliments the collective agenda. That is why the Ukraine “war” cannot “end” until missions are complete. Clown Zelensky, from the very outset, was a “one term” president. That was his telling campaign pledge. Already “powers” above him have scheduled elections for May. This means the Special Military Operation should complete late February or early March. Israel’s architects will need to detonate just before then to cause a real holocaust of the Jews. Hence, the games being played with Iran. Without a massive strike (one that they “cannot ignore”) from those mad mullahs, how can they oil out of blaming themselves for nuclear suicide? Iran makes a great natural bogeyman, whereas Russia, with her elegant Grecian populations, does not. Can leprechaun Putin repair dispute with the West by providing tribute and another Promised Land to preeminent charlatans age old Philistines, who love pretending (cough cough) they are Ashkenazi Jews? Perhaps European “Atlanticists” are the final front to preserve Atlantis inversion doctrine. Though, even that vanguard is falling apart at the seams today.
ozziethinker 