Lies, Damned Lies & Statistics

Though I don’t directly contribute too much to the Global Freedom Movement these days, I still regularly communicate with Brendan Murphy and Aimee Devlin through Facebook channels. In fact this quote by Dr A. Greenberg is borrowed from Brendan:

“As a retired Physician, I can honestly say that unless you are in a serious accident, your best chance of living to a ripe old age is to avoid doctors and hospitals and learn about nutrition, herbal medicine and other forms of natural medicine unless you are fortunate enough to have a naturopathic physician available.

Almost all drugs are toxic and are designed only to treat symptoms and not to cure anyone.

Vaccines are highly dangerous, have never been adequately studied or proven to be effective, and have a poor risk / reward ratio.

Most surgery is unnecessary and most textbooks of medicine are inaccurate and deceptive. Almost every disease is said to be idiopathic (without known cause) or genetic-although this is untrue.

In short, our mainstream medical system is hopelessly inept and / or corrupt. The treatment of cancer and degenerative diseases is a national scandal.

The sooner you learn this, the better off you will be.”

At last someone has said it as it is. Drugs are toxic and are designed only to treat symptoms but not to cure anyone. We all know why. Without endless streams of complaints, toxic medicines would become defunct and the bottomless money well would dry up. The problem is the issues go much deeper than this. Even herbal medicines or natural remedies are pointless (beyond remedial cures) unless lasting solutions are targeted. Philosophers bluster about causality as though they comprehend the dynamics of existence. How about putting that into practice? How about trying to find the cause of all diseases instead of these endless lies, damned lies and statistics? For instance, modern “health” does not know what cancer is as the effects (tumours and so on) are labelled as “causes”.

I outlined the four causes (not the five or six science-fantasy likes to invent) of disease last entry on Ozzie Thinker. These are parasites, bacteria, fungi and pollutants. The biggest causer of diseases, by a green mile, is pollutants, period. So how many pollutants have being explicitly identified as the cause of individual disease conditions? I am not talking about broad brush strokes, suspicions or generalisations. So far, for my research, there have been none, zero, nil pollutants that have been precisely identified as the direct cause of any specific disease (i.e. causer of symptoms). The word “virus” has replaced “pollution” to confuse users and medics into believing these are the same as parasites, bacteria or fungi. They, the good medics, can go in and whack ‘em. That’s the mentality of these spin doctors, the weavers of lies that have built up the war machine. Everything, no matter what, is a conflict.

I would like to review another line of Dr A. Greenberg’s epic quote. In short, our mainstream medical system is hopelessly inept and/or corrupt. I would go farther and say the people that support and enable the system are some of the most robotic, serf-serving individuals I have ever had the displeasure of interacting with. A large part of the health establishment, supported by lowly grades, nurses right up to surgeons have come behind the pro-vaccine movements because to admit vaccines are toxic is an attack on their livelihood. In direct debate a course of ignorance, denial or slander is observed. Nothing will shake their lies, damned lies and statistics.

There is something else that needs to be factored in this discussion to be thorough. It is not only diseases that cause illnesses, toxins do as well. Some pollutants are toxins, but other detractors include venom, poisons, radiation and so on. Though everyone seemed to overlook it, I did make the case for radiation as the cause of a recent localised spike of Brazilian microcephaly infliction (blamed on Zika virus by Mainstream sources) last post. Part of the liars statistical strategy is the pervert the real meanings of words/intent or to label critics as something they are not. For instance, those that observe the use of mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde (via the preservative agent, Thimerosal) in vaccines are labelled ignorant by pro-vaxxers. Yet, the labellers, in this case, ignore the ingredients of vaccines and prove they are guilty of ignorance (principally meaning one or ones who ignore).

A more classic ploy is to claim statistical evidence relates to something it doesn’t. For instance the Mainstream/alternative prognosis of recent issues in Brazil would look something like this, “Well, there were lots of Zika infected genetically modified mosquitos in the area and that’s what caused the microcephaly outbreak”. Let’s look at the use of “outbreak”. Could the microcephaly condition in acute form be caused by a disease wave? Personally, I feel the prognosis looks entirely wrong. These afflictions look like some form of poisoning; say radiation poisoning, but I’m no expert so I have to rely on in depth research and just a little intuition to join the dots (and not vice versa). In fact, gauging what the “experts” are saying about this, credentials are no advantage whatsoever to those serious investigators wanting to get to the bottom of this and find the truth. It is no wonder as lies, damned lies and statistics political currency is the preference for corrupt or inept academics. These foul gorgons deserve to be prostrated and horse whipped before the masses while all their credentials burn in an open furnace. Ah, that would usher in incense for a new age of free thought.

On Facebook I unexpectedly occasionally vigorously jump to the defence of branded paedophiles. Whilst (and as with homosexuality) I am neither pro nor anti the practice, my ambivalence is only moved by oppression; a version of evil. Rabid hordes that champion the attack on underage sex (and that is all it is) are particularly virulent oppressors. No wonder it is the number one action priority of the FBI and all law enforcement agencies on the exceptional occasions genuine misdemeanours occur. They love manufacturing misery, but scarcity does not make good law enforcement business and I am reliably informed all (bar none) child pornography on the extranet was originally uploaded for public attention by agents supporting law enforcement interests. Admittedly several items were the product of intercepted private trades, but nonetheless your law enforcers have made the child porn business, FBI included. I shall possibly explore this in more detail in a future article, provisionally titled, “The Powers’ Great Accolade – Brand Pedo”. Anyway, when I see the regular attacks on the Catholic Church and, less publicised, Judaic priesthood, I laugh, or perhaps I mean grimace.

It is amazing how adept these photographers are at capturing the bad side of a pope. Ignorant minions can then quip, “Oh I see. He looks evil. Case closed”. Well, the case is never closed even if I say so and certainly not for that trivia. Several hundred years ago the Catholic Church began periods of inquisitions, first levied against the French Cathars for daring to assert Jesus Christ was an ordinary human being. Later, in the renaissance, they targeted witches. Just as with the modern paedophile witch hunts, all evidence was reliant of eye-witness hearsay. We only have the not-at-all-inhumane practice (sarcasm) of waterboarding used to encourage confessions in the US (no foot stoves yet). Borderline inquisition cases (where a “witch” only had one or two accusers) were resolved with the float test. The trussed accused was lowered into a pond. If she sunk and drowned, she was deemed innocent of all charges. The unlucky ones that floated were judged as witches and burned at the stake. Now there’s justice for you!

Notably, in the renaissance period, old ladies renowned for their jars of potions lovingly concocted in cauldrons were the target. Their great sin was administering homeopathic medicines to sick people and healing them. The Catholic Church was certainly not going to stand idly by and let that happen. Only Jesus Christ or his appointees were allowed to heal people and, after the confusion of the Dark Ages, the church was all out of healers. So, remembering the title of this essay is “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics”, could, in some cases, numbers of those Catholic priests or Jewish rabbis have been accused by false witnesses offering fabrications because of obstructive behaviour? Continuing this line of thinking, could that obstructive behaviour have been devoted to sea change against corruption and ill-discipline of the very same individuals spearheading the persecution of paedophiles within the church? Yet, the alternative movements blindly crusade on with their inverted crucifixes and other Satanic symbols empowered by nothing less than arrogance and sheer bone-headedness. For those “anti-paedophiles” that zealously embrace insanity, the terrible teens’ syndrome of modern times is the consequence of adults (regardless of branding) fighting over territory rights. You’ve lost the moral debate on unlawful sex. Get over it and move on.

I have already gone into the enslavement of youth as the template for the institutionalization of man elsewhere in this blog, but that control objective has been expanded by the unquestioned righteous. Children can be seized from parents for merely trying to heal them with homeopathic remedies. Let us not forget Dr A. Greenberg’s wise words in the quote above. What did he say again? “…avoid doctors and hospitals and learn about nutrition, herbal medicine and other forms of natural medicine unless you are fortunate enough to have a naturopathic physician available.” Isn’t it odd that the Catholic Church targeted these healers centuries ago and now governments, at the behest of Big Pharma (producing those toxins Dr Greenberg advised against), are trying to do the exact same thing. Those governments are also staunchly against any form of sexual behaviour they decide to deem unauthorised for the greater good. As various forms of Cannabis are becoming so widely known for their curing prowess; it is only a matter of time before the corporate cartels monopolise the resource. Currently, bets are on Monsanto’s lack-lustre genetically modified product (if reports on it are to be believed).

Even so, as I intimated in my last post, “GMOs, Viruses, Vaccines and Military Industrial Sabotage” (which didn’t give me a chance to rattle the tip jar in promotion of my one-of-kind set to blow-the-mind e-book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”), the misinformation layer is inches thick. The focus of that post was the microcephaly “outbreak” in Brazil. The use of the word “outbreak” presupposes a disease cause and I find no evidence of that. It certainly was not the mild flavivirus, Zika (“discovered” in Uganda 1947 but appears to have been around for a very long time) which produces a characteristic fever that burns out in a few days leaving no lasting effects. Yet the Mainstream tabloids “predicted” this was the new Ebola after some very misleading information had been disseminated by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Alternatives, which I judged are predominantly controlled by the same interests that exude the guff in the Mainstream, pushed the ever present “Bill Gates” (Dr Evil) genetically modified mosquito theme. This was another dud, of course.

Particularly in the last two decades of the 19^th century, unqualified mud raking reports became the focus of progressive reform in Mainstream journalism. Standards fell abruptly at the onset of the 21^st century with Fox “News’” entertainment journalism. Of course, this has nothing to do with slander or libel suits. In the spirit of Fox’s sea change (which, I must say didn’t make a great deal of difference to output. With faux news who needs sea change?), professional misinformation blogs pander to every whim of protestor mindset, as can be observed in this bogus Iceland “success story”. My friends at Veterans Today have the knack of saying it so well.

Jon Rappoport is one of those fearless genuine journalists’ that does not pander to corporate will. He is adrift of the system and vital, but never angry. So when his conclusions, judgements, beliefs don’t match my own, I take the difference of opinion very seriously. Last post, for instance, I concluded that the microcephaly spike had been caused by a combination of TDaP vaccines and leaked radiation from large ultra-sound machines. That’s where I and Jon branched and even though I confidently said, “case closed”, anyone that refuses to keep channels open has admitted truth is lost to them. Thus, as Jon favoured pesticides in the water supply and produced a lengthy article paraphrasing Brazilian and Argentine doctors parroting the notion, I took it seriously; very seriously indeed. Glyphosate (the active agent in pesticides), as I pointed out last time, is nasty stuff. It does cause encephalic disorders such as autism and is linked to brain cancer. Jon’s and the doctors’ reasoning is contagiously plausible (given glyphosate is a toxin), but, I still do not concur this time. In the comments section of one of Jon’s articles, I expressed the best analogy I could conjure. Let us compare the head injuries of one attacked by a wiffle bat and another by a lump hammer. If all the microcephaly cases were mild, very slight deformations of the crania, I would have agreed with Jon and the good doctors, but, for my research, some were the consequence of my metaphorical lump hammer. That screams radiation poisoning to me.

Contrary to the opinions of the blind political venters, taking the modern master of lies, damned lies and statistics (perhaps that’s too refined – try bullshit) I do not think Trump is the answer to America’s internal or external problems. I don’t believe he is a game changer for truth, but he is a dangerous player and virtue will be completely reduced to trash in his term, if elected president. To him the end justifies the means and the more lies, damned lies and effective but irrelevant statistics he can churn, the better. Dr A. Greenberg finished his soap box quote with an ever-so subtle throwaway line which can not only be applied to everything everyone experiences, but should be applied without reservation.

“The sooner you learn this, the better off you will be”.

Advertisement

To Boycott is the Strongest “People Power”

Over the years I have read thousands of articles that, in various ways, place the responsibility for the ills of the people at the feet of government. Much noble sentiment has resonated with vocal followings. Mantras of dissent occasionally find a clearing in mainstream pockets only to be twisted out of proportion by jocular commentators. It should be no surprise, certainly to intellectuals, that the will of the people has never assumed responsibility for their occasional discordant outbursts. By that token, they have behaved in a very predictable, manageable way as far as governments are concerned.

Full Tyrannous Platter

If I said, “The moon is made of cheese”, people would automatically think I was being metaphorical (to cheese is to distort), joking or, perhaps, slightly mad. Assuming, for the example, I was absolutely sincere and, misguidedly, conveyed that sincerity to the point that people believed “I” was telling the truth, it would not take a genius to conclude I was in error. Transferring that reasoning by involving government, popular confusion might become clearer. Let us suppose (along similar lines of said reasoning) that “government” decided the moon was made of cheese. To state their case, they sent an astronaut in a rocket to procure some of this mysterious brie. As instructed, astronaut returns, years later, with several vintage samples. Of course, they weren’t actually from the moon that he had not visited. The people, nevertheless, had been presented (with due pomp) their superficial prize, and, just as the king with no clothes, they could not help but believing. Our magnificent astronaut (who, once again, had never left the planet) was given a hero’s status, speaking at universities, writing for scientific journals about his moon visit and, generally, spinning fantasy into reality.

Those that believe governments are “for the people” are as deluded as those that believe an astronaut went to the moon for cheese and consequentially wilfully defy reason to empower make-believe. Deep historic research into the point and purpose of governments will find little more than commerce management systems. From that perspective, “the people” are either slaves or masters. Theoretically, those that unplug from the system either don’t exist or are considered similar in status to wild animals. That is why strict legislation for “feeding the homeless (wild animals)” is gradually being imposed. A technologically inspired ever widening gap between the masters and their slaves has made mass labour superfluous in many ways. Political controllers never really wanted to concede Victorian determinism which saw the underclasses routinely displayed as gibbet corpses for daring to feed themselves independently. Those that abided by the law and starved in plain sight were the cause of humorous foul smelling puns for those languishing at elite dinner tables. Laws protected the lands of the masters in spite of the needs of the people. That fundamental objective (Victorian determinism) of the political machine may be buried in periods of rebellion, but never forgotten. That is the reason why governments are so eager to use war as the rule over matters requiring arbitration, for a slave’s life is demonstrated as being worth nothing.

Many de-facto journalists pin extraordinary faith on mechanisms defining order, such as the “Bill of Rights”, “Constitution” and “Due Process”. However, the system is based on three interconnecting cogs with differing agendas, objectives and powers. Law makers pretend to sell laws to the people and, after their theatre, wizened lawyers (usually affiliated to external instruments such as the Jewish Lobby) ensure the small print is covered with cheese. Thus, almost invariable, the actual laws are nothing like the sales pitch. Without a “Justice System”, laws are not worth the paper they are written on. Just as with political organs, a careful selection process ensures only judiciaries of the right mindset rule and, if anything goes wrong after appointment, bad eggs are expediently and mercilessly expelled. Judges almost always do as they are instructed by the mainstream Medias (which also happen to be Jewish lobbyists).

It takes more than judges and politicians to ensure the criminally homeless do not roam the streets. Using the same tried and tested principles designed to attract natural born killers for the armed forces, sociopath traitors are encouraged to apply to become responsible law enforcement officers. Recruits must demonstrate they can and will follow any order, regardless of content, without hesitation. Any officer that dares to think is deemed to be of the wrong character and must join our newly criminally homeless judges with conscience. The only room for debate as to interpretation of laws is permissible sentiment speculated by the mainstream Medias. Anyone with even a remote attachment to alternative information sources will quickly realise the mainstream loves cheese.

There is no politician or political party in place to save the individual. Law courts and their enforcers vigorously uphold the most unfair, demeaning, unrepresentative legislation then dressed as laws to the letter. Individual laws do voice extremist corporate, religious and other whims usually actually catering for minorities (when true purposes are known). Even so, the court system is limited by size and works as any other instrument of commerce, underpinned by strict targets and quotas. This is complimented by law enforcement agencies that are welcome to set up illegitimate, criminal fronts (sting operations) in the interest of fighting crime. Important captives’ unsubstantiated violations are recklessly promoted as proxy guilt confessions by those cheese loving mainstream Medias. Indeed, regularly, law enforcement public statements are presented “word for word” without question by all news outlets.

We, the people and presumed slaves, are ultimately faced with the responsibility of either believing the bullshit or maintaining individual open minds determined to sanctify truth at any price. Those are the two poles. In practicality, no one can know the whole truth and judgement boils down to belief in the effectiveness of information source and intuition. Over time, differences in accounts, shared information presented by disparate sources and limited direct experience may improve any given snapshot of wisdom. Fall prey to the notion “who do we believe?” is to succumb to bullshit. Critical thinkers will neither accept any proposal lacking tangible evidence or effective supporting arguments nor do they have any beliefs per se. It is high time the rest of you took a leaf out of that book. Put to the test, given the correct weight of plausible information sources not affiliated to the mainstream, lowly minds will struggle to deny the truth.

Newly converted reasoning individuals are caught between the system they used to abide and the sense of, what can be best described as, impotence. As deluded group members, they felt potentially empowered, at least. Now, as enlightened individuals, the reactive impetus shifts to “little me against lots of them”. It is only through awareness of individuality that all those instruments of power become clear. What is the alternative to the banking system? If I cannot abide corporates; where do I shop? Is new enlightened me allowed express integrity and work? What should (can) I, the individual, do about government tyranny of past, present and future? But, most importantly, am I of any value to “humanity” at all? This is an important question as governments, per false belief systems, are heralded as the apex of social goodwill. The path to enlightenment reveals governments are nothing other than polished “mafias” exploiting goodwill.

Newly converted Individuals quickly realise their impact against the machine is so severely limited it dwindles into insignificance. Not only that but any reaction requires inconvenience, sacrifice and loss. These happen to be the three things humans, in general, least like being. Therefore, the only realistic force against the machine is not one of physical might but, rather, the power of boycott. Slaves that refuse to enable the machine, refuse to cooperate, refuse to work en masse would be the system’s downfall. However, subtle, subliminal rebellion is far more effective. Dare I say, “Use that cheese against the bastards”?

It is time for us to move away from guilt by association paradigms, grotesque caricatures overstating zealous morals. It is time for us to get real about reality. Government mechanisms, infrastructures and methods are not all bad. There is a terrific amount of good stuff attached to network and, surprisingly, a lot of would-be good people oiling the cogs that make the wheels go round. Money and banks are not all bad, providing strict controls are adhered to. Corporations could be the model of efficiency and high standards. Here’s an example of a possible boycott. A mystery corporation is doing some very bad things in Africa. All able bodied employees of the slave classes have already set up a guild or union with a spokesperson for US Head quartered operations. Without immediate cessation of proceedings in Africa, ever able bodied worker would strike and picket the US headquarters. If that is too drastic, workers could simply ignore any order, distribution requirements, paperwork and so on coming out of Africa. Just let it all pile up, no arbitration, no militancy. Everyone plays dumb; just like the government. Sure, many would be fired, but new replacements would quickly learn the culture.

If anyone has any other good ideas on how to “keep the bastards honest”, don’t be shy. Comments are welcome and thank you for listening.

Violence Always Leads to Attrition

Regular readers will note I have refrained from addressing the subject of violence, in isolation, until now. Other posts regularly expose brutal control methods; particularly those that review the objectives of Zionism and its paramilitary units, such as ISIS (See http://www.mintpressnews.com/zionism-and-isis-opposing-forces-or-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/199482/), but this one seeks to address the root of the problem. Violence is never fair. Gullible people have been conned into believing that ISIS is the disorganised product of one of the military arms of the Islamic brotherhood. Though now formalised in its own right as a political organ, Islamic Brotherhood has evolved out of a US marketing concept labelled Al-Qaeda (or “database”. See http://www.globalresearch.ca/al-qaeda-the-database-2/24738). It amazes me but there are still some that do not know the purpose and origins of this fantasy; which has ultimately been used to tag and smear any organisation (or, for that matter, individuals) that stand in the way of US agency domination.

For extra clarity, Al Qaeda was not a bunch of Islamic extremists that inexplicably consolidated, but that is what it has become; thanks to your friendly CIA. The next steps were simple. We know the CIA run bogus enterprises (See http://www.katherinealbrecht.com/blog/cia-set-up-bogus-companies-after-911/) to “fight crime” (and if you believe that, you believe anything!). It doesn’t take a big stretch [of the imagination] to work in joint venture control operations with those with the biggest interest in the affairs of the Middle East. Yes, Israel has its own narcissistic agencies, notably Shin Beth (See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Shin+Beth) and Mossad (See http://www.thetruthunites.com/united-states/911-job-mossad-job/). ISIS is one of those bogus joint venture enterprises.

Let’s face it, just as the ancient Zen masters used to use force against itself (See this entry from the Islamic journal: https://books.google.com.au/books?id=h15DCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA45&lpg=PA45&dq=zen+using+force+against+itself&source=bl&ots=4bZ-gv3KT8&sig=vyheWj98Gagr4RbJP8boPb9iiUQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAmoVChMI1YLvv5iMxwIVxKWUCh2X_Ai2#v=onepage&q=zen%20using%20force%20against%20itself&f=false), Zionist masterminds planned and created the festering bowls of hatred that inspire acts of deceit in the name of the divine in the name of Islam aided and abetted by US agents of evil. Even so, I have been led to understand [and, as with American troops] ensuring their filthy business is conducted with zeal requires a great deal of psychological programming of recruits (See http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/01/19/cia-admits-behavioral-engineering-on-humans-mk-ultra/). I can only presume that psychiatrists are unwillingly, or unknowingly, complicit. Either way, the impartial observer cannot help to concede that we are witnessing exalted quackery dressed as a profession (See http://www.wayneramsay.com/drugs.htm). What has this union achieved? Has it achieved anything more than perpetual, never ending attrition?

Talk as I may about roguish politics, my post was actually inspired (if that is the right word) by an unresolved Facebook debate over “violence against women”. Whereas no one is more staunchly opposed to oppressive, aggressive tactics that lead to bodily harm than I, it became clear that the objectives of the Facebook exchange had nothing to do with violence against women (See https://unwomen.org.au/focus-areas/ending-violence-against-women). That was the excuse; the pretext. The real motive of intent of the lady that laid down the gauntlet was to promote her version of the current state of apathy celebrating pathetic peoples unable to defend themselves under the spell of myopic, dishonest laws. Occasionally, even I succumb to their (those dreadful, deceitful propagandists) illusion. Take the word debate. I look up its meaning in various lexicons and find only variations of “argument” (See http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/debate). The emphasis and point of engagements is missed. Where “debate” separates from vulgar “argument” is commonality and compromise are sought as consequence of sincere, considered discussions.

My Facebook “debates” were nothing more than semantics trades; political points scoring. Ironically, or perhaps not so, foul, dishonest Laws are sold and validated by semantics too (See http://jewsdownunder.com/2014/02/22/on-law-lies-and-propaganda/). Adding insult to injury, these vile excuses for reason are enforced by another brand of robotic human. Constabulary adepts are usually more dangerous than drug addled “soldiers” as they have delusions of [individual] grandeur. I once wrote, “Of these born killers, the cowards join the “forces”” to summarise the fundamental difference between criminals and crusaders. It is a form of greed that consumes the ego, when unchecked, developing into megalomania. These visible rabid wolves (drunk with power) are the “officials” in uniform that pave the way for “kangaroo courts” (See http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Kangaroo+Court) made up of jurors selected for their subservience and presiding judges of the right mindset. Tunnel vision determines the narrow bandwidth of permissible debate, error and interpretation. Our licensed to commit slander mainstream Medias’ gross tyranny is regularly pulled up for its sins, but never enough to effect change. Rather, law suits and attrition appear to be the sole objective of those pusillanimous “masters” (sic) behind the illusion.

Harken everyone; don’t fret. Without the people, the system would be nothing. Here’s an example of true grit. Just after I was born, my mother took the long walk between our village and the local town in order to procure much needed supplies. Upon returning, at about the half way stage, arms laden with shopping, a taxi sped past her through a large puddled area of road. Its driver, oblivious to all with cab occupied, had taken no care or attention of passers-by. The predictable outcome saw my mother drenched from head to toe. She made a mental note of the insignia and number plate and, as young as she was, informed the police with view to pressing charges. In those days, the courts at least attempted to arbitrate, so after several months our uncharitable Indian chauffeur was called to the dock. My mother, being honest, gave her testimony from the heart, unabated. The Indian fellow produced twenty witnesses, each, and without exception, offering versions of perjure. They had to be lying as none of them had actually witnessed the event. Though the court, in this instance, found in favour of my mother, it shows how “the system” could be manipulated, particularly, let us say, if there was an ethnic flavour to the judiciary.

It is only fair to consider the police in an arbitrary light. Let’s be honest, they have been presented in a pretty dim light thus far, but not all come with deactivated conscience. Indeed, there are, even today, a few brave, sincere policemen that try, against all odds, to do the right thing. But, how many times has a policeman fingered a potential criminal without the required evidence to back accusations? The Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is just another corporate power with strict targets desirous that quotas are met with persistent regularity. Those numerous grey area “maybes” are easily upgraded in lean times. Thus, even the good, sincere, honourable police rely on perjury exemplified by their individual characters/judgements. Similar to jurors and judges, tunnel vision is an essential attribute for any would be law enforcement recruit. If a suspicious looking male passer-by is black, over six feet tall and carrying a pool cue; super-strung hysteria may well concoct a violent crime in the making. “On duty” imaginations can run wild given the wrong or right character type, depending on the overall objective (always under pressure from those “quotas” I mentioned before). With added complicity from a disassociated, eager for scalps, leadership, our poor “mark” on his aimless walk to the club for a fun, recreational game of Snooker might end up jailed for five years after a plea bargained conviction for attempted murder.

Returning to my mother’s altercation, this is not to say all Indians are socially irresponsible, but as time winds on with creative journalists more and more detached from the truth, people have been told any fantasy will do over and over. Standards are set by the monstrous Medias and courts, whether people like it or not, dance to that tune. Sixty Minutes, Four Corners, Frontline offer nothing short of propaganda in documentary format (infomercials). Of course, if they champion your views, why should truth matter? I will tell you why it matters. It matters because violence always leads to attrition. If individuals launch warring campaigns that are baseless and, other than from the shallowest perspective, are truth free, crusaders can expect violent reactions from their foe.

Currently, according to the hallowed union (judiciary and Medias), the world’s worst evil is paedophilia (See http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/195861). However, I question, once we have agreed what a “child” is (See http://philosophytalk.org/shows/what-child and I split my sides laughing), whether children are being protected or persecuted by the lack of wisdom from the ever-widening witch hunts driven by lynch mob duplicity. Children, in my opinion, are being conditioned to become adults that appeal to the notion “sex is sin” (See http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/6-18.htm). This is very bad indeed. In addition, isolating these so-called paedophiles, I wonder whether attraction to that which is forbidden motivates those that seek greater power than self. A superiority complex (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_complex) could easily develop as paedophilia. Equally those that detest laws and the system in general might use it as a form of revenge. If basket weaving was outlawed, there would be basket weaving bandits. I personally do not see paedophilia warranting serious consideration though. As we are all aware, physical adults are given the label “children” because it is the whim of the skulking, timorous masters – “population control”, “religious”, “hormones” or whatever other gobbledegook they want to present as “science”. Control of humanity is the singular real reason (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_the_law).

It is impossible to do justice to “Violence Always Leads to Attrition” without analysing each word. “Violence” is not necessarily aggressive. There is also passive violence. In the case of women versus men, passive strategies are doomed to meet aggressive reactions. Passive violence might be classed as behaving unreasonably. “Always” never varies. We can say, whether it’s passive or active, violence will engage a chain of events. There is no maybe. It is certain. Of course, my use of “Leads to” denotes those “chain of events” which may be “the end” or, alternatively extended, prolonged, convoluted processes that simmer indefinitely. “Attrition” is generally regarded as weakening, but it can also mean sorrow or loss. There is no doubt violence will result in weakening, but counter measures might lead to greater strength of resolve. Tables turned, the victim may tower tall over a quivering attacker.

But what of arbitrary third party observers? Excluding lust for sport, a good fight, only degradation and sorrow remains. Was not, from the arbitrary perspective, violence wholly unnecessary given a reasoned, civil approach to negotiated communications?

I began discussions with ISIS. In light of our new vision; why have the Zionists created this vile, mercenary army named after the Babylonian Goddess of darkness? Firstly, they are determined to control for control’s safe and hang the consequences – Oedipus complex (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_complex). Nevertheless, the main reason ISIS exists is to manufacture perpetual global sorrow and degradation. It’s good for trade (See http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/BUTLERWaracket.pdf). Relatively few (thank goodness) have experienced the violence first hand, but the relentless Macbeth mainstream Medias have whisked a typhoon of hatred that covers the globe. By their account, everyone’s affected as it’s just round the corner, but everyone is also protected by the spineless, sorry “valiant” and “patriotic”, masters so pay your dues quietly and don’t fuss. But, you see, as with all other varieties of violence, there is raging attrition. The war doesn’t stop with the return of the vindicated aggressors – that’s when and where it begins. All those broken soldiers won’t put your countries back together again.

This will hopefully act as the precursor to my, long-awaited, “Israel, Zionist Ambition, ISIS and US Connections” which exposes intrigue, if that’s the right word, in plain sight. The United States of America’s government has finally come clean in its dereliction of duty “to the people” as highlighted by the “Deny Americans the Right to Know” (DARK) Act (See http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/07/no-one-is-denying-a-right-to-know-whats-in-my-food/399536/). That revolving dictatorship declared war on the people it was bound to protect (though with occasional leaders of dissent) from inauguration. First the 1776 Constitution protected the Lords and masters from Royal ambition only to succeed to 1868 corporatisation of governance (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution). That began a number of steps to the ultimate sell-off of all assets – establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913-14 (See https://www.federalreserveeducation.org/about-the-fed/history). The American peoples [theoretically] no longer “own” nor have [fundamental] right to their land. Fortunately, for them, the fainthearted masters know that violence always leads to attrition. But the fiendish planners are not stupid.

Has anyone considered that perhaps those phoney wars in the Middle East are partially designed to kill of any plausibly dedicated front against utopian tyranny at home? They certainly would not want any feasible force to counter the fulfilment of the degradation of your unconditional enslavement.