It has been long awaited, but after considerable effort, I have suitably tuned materials devoted to the first part of Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons. The perfectionist in me wanted a poetic flow that would harmonise lowly and great as one common mind. Occasional jarring expressive form rudely discords. Outbursts have been minimised to such a degree, I view the finished article as a work of art. Hopefully, it will have the same effect on conscientious readers. This all comes at a price. To me – the best part of a year of my life; to you, a donation of not less than $10US (Australian readers can visit https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/about/ and donate A$12 or more). For clarity, this is not a “fixed price” and there is no ceiling to donation amounts, which should be $10 or greater. Contributions keep the writing project afloat.
Information is not the result of replication and possibly unique. The package small (below 20,000 words), but is not a diamond? Is a diamond merely “quartz” or something intrinsically perfect? Donators should e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org with the simple instruction “Donated for DDD Intro” after payment has been made. An individually inscribed and numbered copy is available for more generous donators determined to ensure my work succeeds (amounts not less than $800). Orders will be despatched in PDF form as expediently as humanly possible.
In case some are still not clear on my style, here is the Preface (included with book) to whet the appetite:
My journey through turbulent seas to reach the point I call now has afforded ample opportunity for witness. The significant culmination marked by the point I call now has unveiled the result of a project being the work of several months backed by decades, if not a lifetime of experience. Other writers do exist. I have witnessed them, studied their results, and revelled in their creativity. They too, often have made extraordinary sacrifices in the belief they have something to say important enough to encourage mass readership. The significant difference between them and me is substance. They choose, invariably, to strictly align to past traditions as a way of justifying sentiment. I do not. Mine is a celebration of originality so any reference to past thinking is surely superfluous. How can originality have references? Thus, though this is a literary work, some readers may be confused into the assumption that much of the rhetoric ‘must be” symbolic or, perhaps, “metaphoric”. I assure those misguided voices that science illusion has such a firm hold on the etiquette of creativity any “contradictions to the fact” are deemed fantastic.
These volumes are not fantasies but will surely confuse avid politically correct philologists. In light of this, some of the subject matter may be reasoned as forms of science fiction, such as “Harry Potter” or, even, one of those strategy game quests. God help me if this is so. I make no attempt, nor will, at trying to appease time honoured traditions that have strangled all hope of true learning at colleges and universities. This is something new, fresh and different. Under these conditions, I make no apology for my findings, present no bibliography and acknowledge only what I believe. The ones that say their beliefs are knowledge deceive. My objective, as a living and breathing entity, is to turn un-knowledge into knowledge. Belief is but the first step towards conversion. Conscientious readers will notice occasional information sources. These are not to prove I am credible but, rather, to allow furtherance of the discovery tour. No attempt has been made to cover my path and I avidly try to pass on the keys for this job is too much for one humble spirit. Every single inference has been double and treble checked. I am my biggest task master, not taking the truth lightly. Lack of vision, misinterpretation and shallow evidence are the great adversaries of truth. My absolute dedication has been to assure senses are fully alert to limit and hopefully avoid anomalies. Reason connotes some critics; ultimately, will find gold for their causes. If that is so, my future mission will surely demonstrate theirs is fool’s gold.
There is certainly a message that begs transmission, but where do I start? You see opinions are so entrenched that the truth has been theorised out of existence. Even intelligent, vibrant human entities have become corrupt beyond redemption, because to champion the truth is to detach from the hive. The message is very straightforward but it will contradict any semblance of conscious reasoning. This is not a knee jerk apologist reaction. It is a frank appraisal of the apathetic tyranny of applied insanity which is given as reality by forces that hallow dulled senses and mindless obedience. The enslavement of humanity began with the commitment to normalcy. What they, the deceivers, categorise as normal changes over the ages, but all support mundane agendas destined to control and the truth be damned.
Beginning at the beginning is always difficult as everything did not appear to start. Instead it has always been in motion. Time, for instance, will be revealed as constantly in the present. For those that subscribe to the intent of the falsehood Big Bang, there was still something prior and the truth is now exposed. The void of nothing is populated by the notion of ignorance, for nothing is everything as what we call something only ever exists in the moment. Once the moment passes it is gone, vapour. Transmuting into something the same or different, so continues the grand illusion until nothing is revealed. We, the subscribers to illusory, programed and normalised by our realities, are ignorant of what went on before Big Bang because if we considered it our sanity (as regimented by science) would be checked. Those that do not buy normal must, surely, be insane? Therefore, by magic, Big Bang just happened. How do the reductionist/materialists express it? Ah yes, “it just popped into existence”.
My writings attempt to decipher lost truths and I explain both what the Big Bang phenomenon was and what preceded the event. Revelations will be as logical as startling. However, I warn reductionist/materialist surveyors, nothing will conform to the Newtonian version of science as much of the evidence for reasoning is non-physical. On the rare occasions Newton and his empirical cultists are consulted, I invariably conclude and recommend their summary calculations are riddled with errors or, more often, flawed from conception. This is not from a lack of respect for Newton, indeed a great man, but from conclusive understand he too succumbed to normalcy of his time. With flawed basis his guide, output was always going to be clandestine. How can measurement of an illusion define reality?
Diligent readers should covet faith and let intellect breathe as the staple for comprehension. For the most part, I shall avoid building colourful stories around props, mimicking current science-exploitation. However, “role play” analogic situations do try and convey my truth for some of my conclusions would be hard to present in any other way. These findings are never fixed and diligent readers may experience mysterious contradictions. My writings are the symptom of a great journey and it would be unfair of me to censor messages I do not fully understand. Thus, everything is included and I make the best of explaining all the difficult bits. As new ideas and information materialise, so conclusions change. In-the-moment readers are only given a snapshot of now; however long now takes. Future writings, new releases and other projects will provide ample opportunity for greater clarity. Do not be surprised if the subtlety of the message changes over time.
My many criticisms of science are not directed at the potential of the medium, but rather at the mechanics as evidenced by the numerous abuses of those that attempt to ensnare ignorance in their vain cause to be right. Modern scientists have become something like junkies prepared to addle their fine minds for money and fame. The four points of influence are commerce, state, religion and pride. Diabolical illusions in the name of science conjure pointless “controls”, predetermined conclusions and fantasy analysis. This is, sadly and for the most part, the joint reign of modern science culture and science practice. Even without those diabolical influences, particularly in light of that empirics’ dead weight, conclusions would always be limited, at best, or flawed, at worst. If we consider space which is traditionally described as “mostly nothing” as, according to empirical science, everything is over 99% nothing, to transmute space general nothingness into a state of everything requires a paradigm shift of thinking. Along those lines, if I was to say that the nothingness of space was an illusion that exposes our ideological slavery and, if we were fully aware, everything-ness could and would become reality; no one even remotely attached to current science and its hive could or would be able to accept it. All attempts at transcendence would meet the same old dead ends and pit falls.
Reductionist materialism relies on nothingness as the core principle for its “everything”. It is time to present my first real challenge to conscientious readers. Can I say that reality, free from perception, is far stranger than everything-ness? Taking reality as illusory, I can confirm that this is clever thinking. However, if I said there was and is only a single point that has been duplicated near infinite times to create everything we know and don’t know; only the supremely courageous could willingly process that concept. Yet that is so and to make matters worse, the original and subsequent overlayed points are vents from nothing – “zero points” is the closest analogy. In other words everything emanates from and is a single [zero] point which, theoretically according to empirical science, doesn’t exist. In addition, in truth, the past, present and future are haphazardly fused together as random snippets and can only be constructively unravelled via the perception of linearity. There have been writings about a so-called “dimension ten” within which the materials of existence are jumbled up and in no particular order. Some emphasis is devoted to this phenomenon in the Introduction and First Part. Our reliance on the frequency we call dimension three (D3) assures we fail to notice its mechanics, which include the numerous scales that define our reality. We have not yet been able to scientifically separate lower dimensional frequencies. Properties of dimensions are explained in the Introduction and First Part. One of the scales specifically related to D3 is chronology. By way of a preview I can say that faced with innumerable preformed scenarios, individuals are bound to choose which “moves” are made. Thus, time and motion appear to go forward in the sense our chronometers indicate.
It is perceived spaces that allow objects to be; even though form only relates to rudimentary perception which is the result of activated cosmic code we call DNA defining/creating all the scales that enforce our reality. Chemical markers that guide researchers and guilds such as the Genome Project might be compared with ice crystals, for instance. In recent times study has been devoted to visual patterns created by sound vibrations. The patterns will never be sound. So it is with cosmic code and “DNA”. However, what isn’t there is as important as what is. In music professional performers learn without rests/spaces there would be no music. The spaces are more important than the notes, because they create form. That rule can be applied to cosmic creation. Our awareness is not just limited to, but is perception. This makes determining what is really real that much harder, for we need to break our cosmic code and step outside the programing to do so. Perception is not reality, but without it there is no reality and certainly no awareness of it. For the large part, and perhaps absolutely, expressive reality through perception universally conforms to the cosmic code and its chemical markers (measured by the Genome Project guild). However, our, human, bandwidth is extremely limited. Full understanding why is unfolded throughout Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons.
I can say, as a preliminary, this is not because “we” are limited, as we are complete, but cosmic code and its chemical markers determine what we are given access to; what it will reveal through our being. Our resonance is limited for some reason which I will try and decipher as one of the essential missions of this work. I will also attempt to expose what perpetuates the normalcy that embellishes the theories and supporting evidence shaping perception under the pretext of validation. My writings, through fault of expressive limits, on occasion will propose closed loops that paradoxically validate and dispute same findings. At times I will appear to support normalcy and others I branch from accepted science diktat. In doing so, conscientious readers would be well advised not to expect partisan control models of the type used by science to court ignorance.
Once again, many of the discussion points raised are nothing remotely “empirically” confirmable and logically perhaps fall into the category “theoretical physics/philosophy” and beyond. This is not to say revelations do not draw on inherence, are not rational as explanations or are beyond confirmation. Reality is explained by such different methods, that to build in science would be the same as trying to weigh happiness. Let us be frank, even popular science relies on hearsay when cataloguing definitions of singular emotion such as happiness or sadness. The scientist cannot avoid known emotions beyond typical craft rationale. He or she relies on empathy as much as predetermination (maybe they are the same?). Diligent readers would do best to approach this work as a big “who-done-it?” with the lead characters not only beyond or of this Earth but also, in part, defy proscribed logic. If nothing else is achieved, it will go some way towards breaking your programming. Get over that hurdle and you are ready to read Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons!