Frustrations of Authorship

frustrated_writer_by_photonerd88-d3gobx6I wrote a book about existence and I thought everyone could empathise with that. Everyone I have met, without exception, has pondered the deepest of all questions, “What is the meaning of life?” I wrote a book on the subject and thought it would be the most popular volume in the universe as it answers the question; the question everyone asks. I know everyone initially pretends that meaning is what you gain from life; the meaning is life itself. At one level this could not be more correct. My book goes into the detail but it probably doesn’t give the answers readers would expect, though why would readers expect anything? Corvus_corax_arizonaIf the book merely satisfied expectation what would be the point in writing it? Perhaps my mistake was my not spearheading a zealous campaign against windmills. I could have attracted a gaggle of likeminded zealots with fragrant positive affirmations. Perhaps I should have listened to those muliebrous ravens. Didn’t they crow? What was their suggestion? One new idea only for each small book and up to four tangents for large volumes, they said. The rest is padding, filler. Anything will do. Add lots of references; the more the better. Authors should conceptualise. People like that, providing it is within reasonable limits and boundaries, of course. No tin foil hat rubbish. That won’t do. It also mustn’t mess with what they know. Everyone knows the Earth is flat, sorry round, the nucleus is the brains of the cell, and gravity affirms Newton-Cartesian philosophy. To even suggest anything different would be crazy.

8820039_origIn order to do this, pull off the impossible, authors must parrot prettier than galahs. New ideas, spontaneous thought, mould breaking concepts are absolute no no’s; well, maybe one new idea per small book, but don’t fret if you can’t think of one. The few that will spot it won’t like it and they will use that to harpoon any chance of your literary success. Better to be a chicken than a turkey?

People are very predictable and very safe. Everyone, without exception, supports the banking system to hilt. Those that prefer cash bless Federal Reserve bankers. There you go. Big business, again pretty much without exception, is the hinge pin of all commerce. I consider my book one of those exceptions, but am I right? Certainly any sales through Book Tango (an offshoot of Penguin Books), Amazon, etc. would not qualify. Although there is a twist (all good plots need twists, I’m told). Purchases via these mediums give me nothing, zero, zip-doodle. Thus, I can honestly say, I personally have extricated myself from the bankers and Federal Reserve pariahs. For the other option, PayPal, it should be stressed, whilst it is not a formal bank, it may as well be one. As a currency transfer management system it upholds all banking principles, including those fine print fees that normal people can’t fathom. The book itself leverages the mega-corporations Adobe and Microsoft products in the soft version. An array of big brand printers might facilitate delivery of hard copy.

rash-s1-facts-rashOf course, there are some that won’t buy e-books. They can visit mine or Jon Rappoport’s websites, for instance, absorb all the free information; each and every article online. They might read some better entries twice, just to make sure the message was understood loud and clear. But those e-books give them each a rash. They are different some way and simply won’t do. I say the only way they are different is they are going to require each and every one of you to fork out money, skinflints. They aren’t free. That is the only difference.

My Facebook network is growing. In fact, just as with some of my more ambitious blog entries, the ruder, more unfairly confronting I am, the greater the interest in me. The phenomenon is akin to school playground fights which attract swarms from nowhere. One of my Facebook friends, I’ll call him Danny, is attempting to establish a truther network (whether he recognises it or not). Most of these guys are retired, semi-retired or on the pension (dole, social security). They are all angry, have lots of time and are mostly clueless. Danny is different. He is, to the larger degree, in tune. He’s got sharp eyes and a good nose, but he’s not infallible; far from it. Well, aren’t we all… infallible? But I didn’t mean it in that way. Jon Rappoport mistakes are very hard to pick and oh so subtle. There’s the difference. Jon is a class act. Danny is not. Pure and simple.

1409022444458Danny doesn’t see it that way. He thinks he is a class act too. But he is not because when the content he promotes is flawed it is very wrong. He doesn’t always learn. Though (to his credit), sometimes he does comprehend, change and adjust past errors. I would categorise him as having potential, but nothing more. Jon Rappoport sees. Danny doesn’t. My book content isn’t beyond him, but it will challenge him. It will be hard going because it will break his world; a world he isn’t sure about, because he doesn’t see. Like everyone else, normal people, he breezes through life, takes things as they come and has a big accumulated chip on his shoulders that started as a pimple in his formative years. Casually, almost in jest, I suggested he seek out “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. That’s all. No big sales pitch. Did it open a tornado of denial and guilt or what? Danny, over several responses, has presented an essay of reasons why he quite definitely cannot seek out my book. And none of them would stand a chance in any fair court.

Ignoring the excuses, which included “being able to read energy inherence” or “plugging into the anthropomorphic field”, the reasons Danny will never invest money or time in my book are three fold. And this goes for just about every other visitor to my blogs too – my readership.

facebook-the-place-people-post-problems-funny-quotes-sayings-picturesHe doesn’t know what he believes because his belief systems are supported by that big chip on his shoulder that has evolved from the formative years. The only suggestions he can take seriously, as a consequence, are “one liners” that are easy to rationalise. That is why the majority of Facebook posts are sayings or proverbs accentuated by pictures.

He is frightened and greedy. This means he will only spend money on “safe” products/services that are guaranteed by the corporate machine. If it is a book, it must be written by some corporate credentialed author. When push comes to shove, only those endorsed by the system in some way have anything meaningful to say. Of course, the system has cracks and that is why Jon Rappoport managed to slip though. His backers will have rued the day they saw potential in him.

free stuff on the netFinally, and perhaps most importantly, Danny is bombarded with free stuff. There is so much out there he doesn’t know where to turn. He doesn’t have time to actually read the articles he promotes or to check out whether they are credible or not. A truther network is a machine; resilient, never stopping. In fairness, I would need to devote my life to process the front page of every blog that was ever created. It would definitely be a futile exercise, but not necessarily pointless. How do I know what I might or might not uncover? Even though I am connected to everything in its vastness and have the potential to source anything from any when, I am not arrogant. There is so much I don’t know, so much waiting for me to discover. Methods are merely vehicles. If an e-book is the vehicle, then let me at it!

When apathetic people hold a demonstration.

In cyberspace I regularly encounter folks that don’t get that a protest creates the battleground and achieves no more than that. Protests highlight how weak and apathetic human beings have become. Virtuous patriots drone on about their marvellous constitution and the betrayal of the founding fathers’ ideals. Nonsense. The constitution never changed except into what it became. The problem was the founding fathers and the subsequent constitution. Prior, the magnificent Magna Carta validated plunder. Plunder is AOK providing you draw up a treaty, according to that logic. No, not right. What did not belong never belonged and you [that cherish ownership] are all thieves. You certainly have no right to anything without a charter. And even with one, if anyone doesn’t agree with any of its clauses, individually, then tyranny has been executed if the agreement is not deemed null and void.  Ownership is cancelled. Money-is-worthless-unless-we-want-it-poster.001-e1409085262488You own something only because the other agrees. Everything else is nothing more than possession. It’s mine because I found it. I ignore history. Funnily enough, your beloved cash; money is fiction too. If the belief in fiscal systems was fractured, eventually all money would be worthless.

I haven’t said anything to Danny, but if I had the chance, this is what I would say. The reason I provided PayPal as the method for purchasing my book is would be readers can make donations. My advice to Danny would be he should donate as much as will force him to treat the book with absolute respect. If that means it costs $1000 so be it. Imagine that. If you were forced to pay $1000 for my book, you would make sure every word counted. You wouldn’t read it once. You would read it hundreds of times, at each sitting savouring a little more. And that would be no bad thing, because some of you might be required to do that for full, solid comprehension of contents. Remember the advice from the ravens earlier? “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” is a work that goes the other way. It gives only new ideas, some admittedly formed from old, but, ultimately, everything always will be what it was. All those that grudgingly coughed up the bare minimum for the volume hated it. They had no respect for it; it broke their world, so they hated it. One lady paid many multiples of retail price (sic), read it several times and, eventually, loved it because she understood it. She had to understand it because she respected it. Understanding became the mission.

scroogeLet’s say someone did donate $1000. It would only ever be hypothetical because none of you are capable of doing that. Let us say this hypothetical philanthropist (if that’s the right word) read from soft cover to cover numerous times, but still could not overcome the typos, strange non-words, weird writing style and alien phrasing. They put everything into it and still hated it because they didn’t understand it because they were not ready for it. Even then, it would still be value for money. Every inch of real estate was devoured but simply did not compute. Outstanding discipline met with an outstanding result, because from an arena of respect, lack of understanding amplifies the discovery tour. Leave tackling the advanced literature for the time when materials for beginners and intermediates are mastered. The book merely opens a new time doorway, possibly put on one side for graduation day.

Whether I am nasty or nice, I will guarantee not one of you (that hasn’t already done so) will donate for my book for any or all of the reasons above. Those that donate small amounts are always too busy. Please don’t bother.

Advertisements

Time: The Great Quandry

51gTKHWX+cL._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_Recently I offered a completely-unseen-before excerpt of my now print-friendly book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (See https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/about/) to Global Freedom Movement (See http://globalfreedommovement.org/) subscribers. So, I thought, in the spirit of illumination, Ozzie Thinker bloggers might appreciate the information.

Feedback from my Fans

It is only a short book (under 20,000 words), but, within, texts compress wisdom of great power; some Ideas so transcendental in nature they are not of this Earth. These are no ordinary writings. Up-and-coming American musician, Andy Duong (See http://www.chronicgenius.com/Main.html), reached out and donated for his copy. Secretly (he told me later) he thought I was just another one of those “know-it-all’s” and bought the book merely to pull it apart. However, after reading it, his sentiment changed.

I went ahead and read your book last night. Very powerful stuff. Lots of odd connections were made [leading up to donating for your book]. Your content was challenging, empowering at times […] and a little disturbing […] because of the materialism [criticisms]. […] It is an excellent book. I want to read it again [in a much slower and thought provoking fashion].” AD

Another fan is somebody rather closer to home. You all should know him by now. Brendan D Murphy’s donation didn’t break any records, but as an Australian luminary, I would have probably given him a copy, if pressed. His feedback can be reduced to a single short sentence:

It was just like my book.” BDM

9781452507118_COVER_FQA.inddThat is the greatest compliment anyone could have given me. There’s a little bit of Narcissus (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissus_%28mythology%29) in all of us. Trust me “The Grand Illusion” is Brendan’s baby. For him to place my book of equal status is, well, I have already said it, the greatest compliment anyone could give.

As I had already released a preview in “Is Science Illusory”, I had planned to tempt donators with the “Preface” (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2015/01/04/introduction-to-dimensions-deceptions-demons/), but after some stern words of caution from my American fan, I have decided to take a different tack.

[The Preface is] too anti-materialism, only harping on the negative. Your book [on the other hand] is mostly positive and undeniably uplifting – an immensely deep, profound read.” AD

A Fresh Approach

I need a different tack because I am disappointed. Any normal person would have presumed that a small, but robustly vocal following would have amounted to numerous, doting donators eager for an enlightenment download. Not so, I’m afraid. It is as if, with all that “cute talk” about it, next to no one is interested in having existence explained. They take sanctity in the shark infested dark waters of ignorance.

Fewer than 100 copies have been dispatched including giveaways. What a sorry outcome for a year’s perspiration devoted to genius? You guys can make a difference. You can turn things around and give ignorance a hiding. Before I roll out the big guns and eye candy to tip those teetering on the brink, I can say, wholeheartedly, that I have listened [to critics]. Jesting aside, honestly I would be so appreciative if everyone ran with this ball, not only donating but also tenaciously spreading the good news on personal networks. Oh boy, that would make me happy.

People said to me, “We don’t like no e-books {the double negative seemed to figure here]. So I have created a version that will print as 24 pages of unadulterated, lovingly crafted text (you can even toss the preface and lose 2 more pages). There is no point in “publishing it” because, in light of its size, that would be overkill. The way publishing works, as Brendan will tell you, is it’s not the size that counts. Therefore, the price of producing 20,000 words is about the same as a 200,000 word edition! Crazy, I know, but that’s the business.

A Pretty Face is the Best Anonymous Fan

MsXopPbgAimee Devlin, given her proximity to Brendan, I’m pretty sure has probably read “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. She hasn’t given any direct feedback, but I know she would have loved it even if posthumously. Even though her mind would match the average professor’s, they say “eye candy” sells, so it gives me a chance to show off the face of a pretty anonymous fan.

Let’s be honest, when all said and done, it is the blessed text that should promote the book. latestThat’s what people are donating for. So, without further ado, I have selected a never-seen-before (with the exception of the various donors) snippet aimed at knocking the sooks off. The problem with this, for anyone that saw the relevant hilarious Big Bang Theory episode (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikO4vBwNHWk) with Sheldon trying to select the perfect birthday gift for his girlfriend (another Aimee [Amy], as it happens), is judgement is largely determined by taste or “one person’s perfume is another’s poison”. Even so, if Mayim Bialik counted as a fan that would really give me a boost.

Profound wisdom from Ozzie Thinker

…All dimensions consist of up to four simple elements; pulses, force fields, waves and frequencies. Similar symmetry is found in cosmic code. The Genome Project has identified a variation (or symptom) of DNA that consists of four chemical elements which, in correct combination, can create anything. There is nothing beyond the power of creation.

indie-rock-musician-wallpaper-3-2-s-307x512A big part of the creation process is perception. Indeed, without perception nothing would exist. Yes, I have heard all those Zen-style arguments about trees falling in unimagined woods which have not been witnessed. However, if there was no perception, existence would not exist because there would be no awareness of it. Perception is a cooperation of existence and awareness. In the case of human beings, the cooperation is selective. We are all surrounded by extra-dimensional entities all the time, but the majority [of us] cannot see due to limited [which is also arguably flawed through limitation] perception. Our perception is designed to make sense of our reality. In fact, more so that reality is our “sense”. Considering my earlier introduction of the mysterious False Matrix, this opens the door to the probability of external influences manipulating how [our] vision is rationalised. A constant electronic mass Media stream shaping opinions to ensure conditioning is the ultimate way of securing imperfection. The False Matrix is a hidden, much more subtle and vastly superior version. Because we rely on our sense of reality, instinctively, we are more likely to block than accept change and this adds to the vile assault on human will, the discovery tour and, as a consequence, balanced investigation. Many would go so far as denying or attacking change for change’s sake in order to preserve their reality. As no single voice plagues society with its exclusive brand of mediocrity, our paradigm can be extended to clashes of culture. Muslims want a Muslim world and defy those that stand in their path. Strict homosexuals, as a variation, might concede bi-sexuality in order to preserve their social acceptability and respectability.

Self-expression invariably relies on cultivating many voices combined as the monotonous chiming “royal we”. The group transcends the self and the art of propaganda belies imagining a group identity even if it does not exist. The pinnacle of Globalist exploit is being conducted to the tune of xenophobic Zionism. This is something that goes way beyond Judaism and is certainly no expression of faith. In fact, the reverse is true. Zionism, unsurprisingly, is an apex of exo-politics. The same pretend factions, visible and invisible, have precipitated proxy order of differing brands through the ages. They fabricated history to censor comprehension. Courtesy of the anthropomorphic field that governs how we react to the astral plane (giant highway that comprises all dimensions and timelines), it is impossible to suppress the truth. Parties to the deceit with clear vision have but three options. They can ridicule that which contradicts their fantasy using terminal props supported by corrupt academics. When that ruse fails, it is then only possible to censor, lose or forget key transgressions against the tyranny that holds power. Finally, only assault and death will bury voices that pierce totalitarianism. History needed to be painstakingly rewritten to cover the tracks of those that lead. The most critical misdemeanour has been the erasure of the true origins (note plural) of man. Chapter two, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity and its Practical Implications”, will redeem conscientious readers. Truth has been in front of your noses all along. “Vision” is all that was ever required.

Existence is much more complex than humanity and its mainstream science supposes. I have explained why the academic community, guided by reductionist/materialist peer groups, cannot or will not comprehend value added existence in the preceding paragraphs. Now I shall attempt to decode the greatest secret of all. It is important to start by saying that though we rationalise time as linear, it is anything but. In fact there is an attractive magnetic force which acts as an unseen guide, something I call blueprint time in other writings. As we shall learn blueprint time is not likely limited to a single print. The same way a prolific painter maps out his latest grand masterpiece, so too are cornerstone events etched into blueprint time. These act as anchors that, in many ways, puncture the fabric that connects dimensional realities. Time itself is series of static scenarios which might appear in chronological order should the experiencer rationalise them that way. Perhaps rationalise is the wrong word. We attach or pin ourselves to each new scenario in an order we call chronological. From this rationalisation of what we generally call “reality”, blueprint time runs in the reverse direction. In other words it starts at the end and finishes at the beginning as scenarios needed to be prepared for attachment in chronological order. Attachments are presented as “menus” that reflect the choices a user faces for any given moment. In its “raw state”, time consists of a hotch-potch of unordered scenarios, thus going forwards or backwards is either the illusion for the experiencer or the determination of the planner. Remembering our earlier gateaux analogy, time is the ingredients randomly arranged, blueprint time is the recipe, and linear existence the cake.

Are you all intrigued?

animal-farm1I think that sample is incomplete and enticing enough to summon brave truth seekers. But, maybe freedom is actually “change without revision”? That would mean we can review the same old worn out theories re-dressed as “new truths” for perseverance of liberty. That, in context, of course, would mean “new freedom” is precisely the same as old slavery; as George Orwell so aptly expressed in “Animal Farm” (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm). For me, freedom begins with clarity of purpose, cosmic laws and comprehension of the divine. That is why I cannot understand why people haven’t scaled glacial peaks to access fundamental truths.

Really, once again, it boils down to change with or without revision. Those that see value in revision should donate for my book without hesitation. Our remaining, inquisitive inept[s], fearful of detachment from the safety of “the system”; you need to take a walk on the wild side. The worst that could happen is you become more certain of the beliefs you already have.

You’ve convinced us. Where the hell do we donate?

You can seek the book out on Book Tango or Amazon, but due to its larger font size, printing will be a nightmare. Alternatively, and preferably, donations are welcome here (https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/about/ or https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/about).

Stop press!!! I now also teach concert piano (skype sessions would be possible for overseas students, but check out my Youtube channel first: see https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbBepuuJ6jPDSDfzX69bTfg) and regularly perform here (See http://www.amateurperformers.com.au/) (It’s only $5 entrance to cover nibbles and drinks – everyone’s welcome).