Garbled Philosophy Applied to Immunization to Ultimately Commit Genocide?

Some have been possessed with foresight enough to acknowledge the gaping flaw pertaining to Louis Pasteur’s Immunization Theory is the very underlying philosophy that permits its authority. According to championing medical preachers, a body’s immune system is generally deficient in its construction, unable to meet challenges of defense against disease by natural means. Thus, short of “medical” intervention, humanity is doomed to perish from resulting attacks delivered by unknown and unseen invaders, such as “Coronavirus”. “Viruses” (ushered in long after Pasteur’s death) of course compose formulated doctrines based on set biological patterns, because (other than those with ancient historic origins, such as tetanus and rabies) none have actually been isolated. Ignoring the fact that dis-ease implies illness stems from the mind’s inability to deal with a body’s biological complications, vogue medical ideology prior to Pasteur’s evocation was quite different in character. Notably, pioneer Antoine Bechamp (Pasteur’s teacher) emphasized the significant role of external terrains over a body’s resources. Consequentially, from his painstaking research, the great scholar was able to collectively identify how internal blood systems reacted to varied incoming environmental threats.

To him, the idea of injecting someone with a serum was notionally flawed. Nevertheless, precise words from a well-coined quote of his are as follows [translated from French]: “the most serious disorders may be prevented by the injection of living organisms into the blood…into a medium not intended for them”. The emphasis here is on “may” here, reinforced by the warning “not intended for them”. In effect he postulated that a vaccine might meet the same reaction as bacteria when introduced to the body. The world has sadly moved on in the opposite direction since Bechamp’s time (at the turn of the nineteenth century). Current vaccines deliver non-living biological matter and inanimate particles, such as heavy metals (mercury, aluminum) and formaldhyde (rat poison), to “patients” in some cases. Indeed, according to medical insider rumours, prions (forms of retro-virus) cultivating bovine spongiform encephalopathy (better known as Mad Cow Disease) is the sensational mystery ingredient aimed at “boosting” certain batches of COVID vaccine.

History of serum contamination (as there is no sound explanation for the presence of heavy metals), certainly demonstrated many positives following a study of one hundred different brands by an independent Italian research team back in 2016. Roughly thirty per cent of samples tested showed identifiable traces of aluminum. Findings have failed to impress successive Italian governments though, who had been pushing for mandatory immunization against Covid for local departing international travelers from late last year. All the while, an angry posse (40,000 strong and growing) of world class doctors continuously protest at “flawed reasoning” behind untried and untested compounds being used against an unknown virus that has shown to be “treatable” using standard influenza remedies (if only China had listened), before deaf bureaucratic ears. In fact, any serious analysis of history damns the grubby enterprise. For example, work on the Gates/Fauci/Soros “Frankenstein jab” began nearly a decade before Coronavirus came to light. How can that be? Per immunization philosophy, how is a predictive remedy possible? According to hidden reports there could be some ambiguity over my use of “came to light” here. Anthony Fauci (in prep mode presumably) apparently boasted of a monumental pandemic coming very soon back on his 2017 American university tour.

Following my mention of that valiant Italian study, there is further hard evidence supporting the use of heavy metals in vaccines. Details provided under Eli Lily’s 1931 patent of Thimerosal are explicit. Mercury and Aluminum are two listed ingredients. A new 1950’s patent itemized Formaldehyde too. In terms of historic background, the product’s menacing curriculum vitae commenced with a miracle “chemo” (whatever that is) cure, but as none of the dozen or so terminally ill patients used as guinea pigs (primarily to justify the patent) survived any longer than expected, medical application was not widely adopted and that version was short-lived. Rebranded into various types of hospital sterilization agents, its continued employment is tragically marred. Taking form as bedpan cleaning powder, it was deemed to be the cause of Pink’s Disease and subsequently formally banned from use. Only after that shock were the boffins at Eli Lily forced to go back to the drawing board. Thimerosal’s Phoenician return, after strained deliberation, came as vaccine preservative. Because compounds don’t usually require individual ingredients listed, we could argue those horrible components (heavy metals, etc.) have found a way into vaccines via the “backdoor”. Details on when product was first added to improve inoculation compliance is ambiguous, but it may have been as early as the late 1980’s. Only a few years later, in 1993, educated Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s emphatic pleas stressing a definite vaccine/autism connection were aggressively shunned by an inept (and probably corrupt) establishment.

Others also came out. Predictably, conspiracies against fair dissemination of information were not limited to the attack on Wakefield. Everyone that went against authorities that wasn’t completely ignored earned a routine dose of tar and feather treatment. Adding to the fray, mainstream Medias have wasted no opportunities or effort to scanadalise “unconscionably stupid” anti-vaxxers. Their one sided war has found no bottom to the foul depths exposing shallow case arguments used, which almost exclusively forge basis from ingenuous superstitions cultivated from “vogue” mindset (i.e. emphasizing “the group” must be proper, because corresponding views are in vogue). Statistics drawn on never amplify the obvious fact that there is no demonstrable criterion to establish with any certainly that vaccines even “work”. Indeed, given all too numerous side effects, downplayed par for the course as far as they are concerned, any reasoning supporting supposed due diligence is nullified. Taking the instance of small pox history, records show incidence was on a rapid decline (or burn out) before vaccines were introduced. If alternative Media reports are to be heeded, the well-publicized Gates foundation gift to Indian hill tribes infected beneficiaries with polio. Information about the foundation’s subsequent involvement with Africa paints a familiar sorry tale. Then, of course, we have senior scientist Thompson’s sensation official confession to squelching data at the behest of Merck after he had internally reported finding a vaccine/autism link in African Americans. It seems no accident Executive director Julie Gerberding had overseen similar alleged antics by the Centers for Disease Control before she moved to Merck.

In other words, stakes are high and, thus, the game is played dirty. Naturally, following this protocol, according to the mainstream, believable accounts are exclusively issued by those [whether in authority or otherwise] that support their agenda. Pertaining to this, their very rogue utopian strategy espouses “vaccines will save the world so everyone must be inoculated at the drop of a hat, bar none”. As with maligned law court “expert” choruses, jurisdiction over such matters is greatly overstated in order to leverage perceptible advantage. Calculating the chance of finding and prepping willingly corrupt, sufficiently educated to maintain the elite agenda from the extraordinary numbers of peoples that inhabit the Earth is so high, it would prove an easy challenge to fulfill. We can see revolving flawed arguments have dominated politics for decades, so why not pollute the sciences too? On that front, some years ago I penned an article postulating that our sciences are illusory. Is an apple pushed or pulled to the ground by “gravity”? How can one definitively prove associated conjecture surrounding an invisible (and otherwise imperceptible) force? I maintain this is an impossibility without knowing the truth.

Equally, many of those defenders of “the system” use flawed equations to justify their belief that mitigated attacks aimed at dramatically reducing global populations would defy interests of commerce.  The supposition more people is better for business isn’t necessarily true. Greater numbers over the spread does provide traders more flexibility, but that is a double edged sword, for greater numbers compete over and limit availability of scarce resources as well. When analyzing need for war against diplomacy, we can quickly observe another critical defect in the defenders’ thinking. War is destructive. Precious assets are regularly contaminated or destroyed per course of operations, which, from a “cost with no reward” banking perspective is an undeniable “lose/lose”. In some instances, enormous numbers of innocent people are killed, mostly while evacuating conflict zones. Per Winston Churchill’s deliberations on the subject, these deaths are normally remembered as collateral damage through cause of friendly fire. Accountants may well lament over the fall of Iraq, for negotiation is always far cheaper, but I suppose corporate commerce did unilaterally secure the oil supply at enormous human tragedy. It seems to me, that beneath all its vain pledges of universal wellness and fickle prophecy promising the vanquish of all diseases, a vile, conscience absent black establishment heart is amply exposed by ongoing side by side intifadas that refuse to allow our world even a day’s break from perpetual battle.

In other writing projects, I have regularly introduced those enigmatic 1983 Georgia Guide Stones, my primary exhibit favouring a conspiratorial agenda against man. In biblical times, stone tablets laid down the Law. Laws which, per notional conceptualization, were never up for negotiation nor flexible. They dictated the way things should be, the way things are and the way things will be. So too, in my opinion, do the Georgia Guide Stones offer a rigid conceptual doorway to permanent modern morality. From its many illustrated commandments, my selected stanza insists global populations may not amass above five hundred million at any given time [a requirement of the messianic age?]. Taking current civilization levels, at an estimated seven billion, to meet orders would beckon a feat of divine intervention. But let’s face it, everlasting war has hardly had any stringent effect in pruning the masses. Besides, burgeoning birth rates aggressively outstrip consequential deaths. In many ways because their post 1950’s ongoing parallel war on disease has reduced infant mortality to such an extent, vicious authorities have generously “shot themselves in the foot”, but I guess they may use this advantage to overstate the impertinence of any genocide accusations leveled at them. Pertinently, cultures that traditionally produced vast numbers of offspring haven’t changed direction by much, so certain third world countries have sponsored unrelenting birth booms. Indeed, it would be reasoned to say human behaviour addressal has not kept pace with medically ordained goodwill initiatives. Yes, westerners have largely conformed with the program, but that is because the cream of (genuine) science either originates from or is adopted by the west. Ostracized other civilisations have dragged their heels and….everything else. Addicted to sexual reproduction, they simply haven’t been able to embrace the light.

In terms of drainage, war does more than destroy messily. Infrastructures and supply chains are critically resources heavy. Furthermore, dead and injured have to be found and buried or rescued, which is fine when the body counts run to hundreds of thousands. But an effective peoples’ purge (leaving only dead) would need to accumulate in the billions if it was to have any lasting negative impact on civilization; and any incursion would need to be conducted in double quick time to offset that ever growing birthrate juggernaut I mentioned earlier.One prior published writing project did the mathematics surrounding this very subject. Conclusions found any mass cull would need to be executed over minimum days to diffuse word of mouth warnings that might well proliferate an outwards funnel to fuel global panic (this making “wary” targets at least theoretically harder to locate and kill).

It is unlikely the purge is destined to be indiscriminate. Well-bred peoples, the bane of civilisations are most definitely not going to be in the target zone. Therefore, efforts must be condensed to succeed, discriminating between “in” (doomed) and “out” (survivors, i.e, might the whole of Brooklyn New York, be spared?) locations selected for decimation. Even so it would be impractical to presume experienced funeral personnel could be sifted from the remainder and saved. This is significant as, globally, currently a million (give or take) dead bodies are processed by various funeral systems annually. In terms of numbers, six thousand times that resource allocation should reduce populations to necessary Georgia Guide Stones compliant levels. Deceased would surely rot quickly and become volatile disease centres, so disposal remedies would need to be actioned within a maximum of three weeks to fend off emergence of a real potential global pandemic. Obviously, figures do not prepare for good omens here. With the surviving five per cent of trained mortuary workers to meet burden, group efforts would have to step up by a factor of two million (each mortuary worker must provide the labour resources equating to two million men to achieve deadlines). More realistically, even increasing standard workload by four fold, it would take approximately thirty thousand years to give all deceased a decent send off. Thus, I concluded in my prior articlethe “powers” have gone totally bonkers” if they intend to implement this strategy. Now, I realise too that many may well sympathise with public wrath against hypothetical phantom menaces that have been aired by various lay preachers within earshot of Medias over the ages. Lay preachers invariably make abominable mathematicians and here carefully reviewed figures undeniably trump spiteful, flailing emotion. Indeed, under no circumstances would it be possible clear away the dead in sufficient time to halt aggressive plague. Perhaps the larger portion of habitable Earth would have to be demarked as “unsafe” in order to protect those that remained in circulation.

It goes without saying contingencies are destined to derail standard supply chains, in some instances, more or less to a halt. Under such conditions, survival will unlikely be a pleasant experience and may possibly well usher in terrible times with truncated to non-existent resources (that once were commonly available) fomenting acute dissatisfaction as to what the world has become. With staggering numbers of dead, it is unclear how far disease would travel, so, perhaps, nowhere would be classed as entirely safe without hospital grade protection measures. Who is going to manufacture basic supplies? How and by what means would they be delivered? But, perhaps, we don’t really need to contemplate over this at all. For instance, let’s say the powers did go totally bonkers, the mammoth perplexing question is: “who” (is trustworthy enough) to engage for a blitzkrieg-style attack on the masses that is so swift it beats the reaction to pulse news?

There would be mutiny across the military if such an unprovoked wide scale operation was sanctioned. The only other options could be the release of fatally noxious gases into large sections of the atmosphere or that clandestine “medical” attack I’ve already projected. The word on the street here [in Australia] is many will hold off [for years] until the [side] effects of Coronavirus vaccine are definitely not limited to the antipodes. Woeful laments reverberate echoes along the length of that US mass Media juggernaut. White evangelists located in the bible belt regions for one have lost faith in vaccinations. Of course any figures can be fudged, but as far as universal inoculation is concerned there ain’t going to be a blitzkrieg here or in any first world outpost, by any stretch of the imagination. If the truth be known, I assume the powers are caught between a rock and a hard place over this whole caper, but please let me explain my reasoning. I mean, the astute (glued to alternative Media resources) will know what’s really going on very quickly, though most people rely on the “machine” for their “news”. So here’s the problem. Presuming fear of vaccine side effects isn’t limited to Australians and American evangelists, if any of the many “solutions” touted raise alarms, all further campaigns are doomed to fail.

Even mainstream Medias know “people talk” and if their “holy” sentiment doesn’t reasonably align with popular gossip, well they are exposed because no one will believe them, and that, they know, maybe is enough for excommunication without parallels. Thus, were deceptive medical authorities to adopt a euthanasia drug that acts longer term, which might do the dirty business a few years down the track without unnecessarily ruffling feathers prior, many will still be waiting in the wings apprehensive of positive or negative symptoms when the true agenda comes to light. Slip stream word travels fast, so the moment inadvertent truth about vaccines became common knowledge, the whole operation would be more or less rendered stone dead without possibility for resurrection (praise be). Nevertheless, if a “few years down the track” equated to ten years (for instance), it is debatable whether future population targets would reduce sufficiently anyway. The crux is this. Were the potion to take poison effect in under five years, per my earlier specification, alarmists majorities are saved. If the “goodwill” period was sufficiently extended (beyond five years), influx of new births would amply replace numbers of provisioned dead. In addition, would breeding habits in the West radically change to compliment needs to fill otherwise lacking population gaps?

There’s another looming issue for those deviant industrious planners. Other than Gates/Soros Moderna, alternative branded vaccine options uniformly appear to be rush jobs. For instance, whilst Pfiser’s serum was officially pulled from Australia because there were no storage facilities cold enough, unconfirmed rumours around the circuit lay claim that some test patients in clinical trials had somehow managed to “catch HIV”. Those “in the know” know last HIV epidemic was the result of polio compounds being contaminated by selected hosts used to cultivate antigens (in this case live kidneys of chimpanzees and green monkeys). Old dogs rarely know new tricks, so I presume Pfiser’s current aborted effort went through the same paces as tainted polio in its wake. That aside, where unknown components are involved, science has a lousy record at substantiating effective prediction. Perhaps that is why America’s valiant Surgeon General rejected Gates/Fauci’s contagion [computer] modelling strategy when decisions were being made over approaches to Coronavirus. Does this also suggest there has been some skepticism in the belief in plague by some echelons of the American government?

So, returning to the powers’ “strategy blunder”, we have deliberated a vaccine earmarked to kill off users within five years may well prove a misnomer. There’s more to add on this. Results will depend on individual constitutions, spiritual strength and many other unseen factors, so I would imagine many of those “billed” to die simply won’t expire on schedule, courtesy of fate. Thus, considering feasibility sanely, this makes me think the whole charade is unlikely to the extreme. Though one can never entirely right anything off when it comes to “potty” establishment behaviour, my original determinations on the subject seem the most likely way events will trundle forward. These original determinations postulated the final solution would serve up injectable sterilization methodologies. Active critical ingredient linking all vaccines “solutions” most likely is planned to render all female users infertile. But why pick on females? Well, it seems the purpose is to neutralize potent genetic materials found in ovary eggs; the bourn of reproduction. Not that any mainstream source (to my extensive research) embraced the story, but according to cultural venting, Bill Gates inoculation of young Filipino women left participants incapable of childbirth. Sterilization was one point of a long list of reasons that apparently ended Gates Foundation tenure in Africa, once again according to superficial examinations. Significantly less breeders guarantees population nose dives without any impact on the funeral system.

Economies will eventually shrink certainly, but will also remain amply sufficient for purposes of aggressive commercial enterprise. In effect, the major consequence will ensure the privileged few each receive a much greater bounty of the world’s genuine treasures than before. Consumerism will wither as a concept resigned to a forgotten past. Naturally, distribution networks will have to morph into something leaner and meaner than we have today. Many industries will be forced to subside or bow out of existence due to lack of demand (potentially sponsoring the demise of many businesses that were successful prior to changes, well other than those retirement proof colonialist gems, doubtlessly). Middle classes and corresponding middle managers are doomed to have a very limited lifespan. Social strata will almost certainly comprise of bourgeoisie above proletariat, with next to nothing in-between. Aristocrats have always traditionally despised middle classes. Perhaps to stave off overt rebellion casual “whip masters” may find occasional footholds here and there, but that would be the exception, rather than the rule. Without doubt, the military and other cornerstones of “order” will be as bureaucratic as ever, proposing the only real opportunistic venues for career progression. Everywhere else, the haves will have and the have nots won’t and that is the way it will be.

It is important not to lose sight of the fact that the only other “worldwide” epidemic in living memory was HIV and that, our illustrious Medias inform us now, turned out to be a dud. Mostly identical contingency planners for Coronavirus are in position to pull strings. Jon Rappoport’s AIDS Inc. argues the earlier “great commercial opportunity” was a medical heist run by people who (largely) didn’t give a damn about healthcare or the authenticity of the plague concerns. They did care about money. How much it was going to cost to grease palms and rig market fear. How much they were going to reap from the enterprise. Jon’s book is jam packed full of detailed information but, for me, the most critical above critical specific path he follows provides reasons for why AIDS came into being. Truth on the matter would petrify the average gargoyle insomuch as it demonstrates “powers” possess neither conscience nor scruples. It is imperative to emphasise that HIV never did cause AIDS (just as Coronavirus possibly does not cause any deaths that show up as “positive”). AIDS was the resulting side effect of an anti-HIV drug called AZT. Vitally, those behind the introduction of AZT would have not been even slightly surprised by its toxic attack of any body.

The drug had been used before to target cancers. When doctors observed more patients “on medication” were being ransacked with aggressive tumours than those not on medications, the “cure” was shelved. That was back in the 1950’s. By the 1980’s and 90’s the drug’s onerous history had been long forgotten. It is difficult to determine whether HIV/AIDS “marketing” began before or after the introduction of AZT. Clearly mass Media promotion of the gay plague was geared to coerce potential sufferers (with flu symptoms) into reacting. That reaction would see prominent celebrities clambering for their predictive medications, not knowing that AZT was to be the deliverer of certain death. In other words, prominent gays were “set up” as bait to draw an unconscionable worldwide genocide campaign. This dereliction of compassion hasn’t stopped with civilians. Oh no! They’ve targeted the military too. Medications issued to first Gulf War combatants (protecting them against Saddam Hussain’s non-existent biological/chemical weapons) killed more than fifty thousand. That was the unofficial reason Timothy McVeigh attempted to attack an Oklahoma Federal Building in 1995.

According to Dr. Judy Mikovits (who once partnered with pandemic “point man” Anthony Fauci) the same basic clowns that ran the HIV pantomime call the shots for Coronavirus as well (not a direct quote). Gates’ contagion modelling effectively mimics the earlier approach to HIV (net product of a million “ever changing” theories-in-motion). The “powers” did permit a documentary on mainstream TV which has exposed the truth on how HIV came into being (piggybacking off polio vaccine), but no one lost anything as a result. Reflective honesty may have been applied to HIV, but knowledge on AZT and horrific symptoms of medications used on Gulf War veterans are the best kept secrets this side of Christendom. Praise those salaciously brave alternative Medias, because they’ve popped the smoking gun.  Your masters wouldn’t think twice about killing you; whether that is for money, the colonialist agenda or other reasons. In this instance, another reason I have identified is a commandment ordered by the Georgia Guidestones that amply fulfills the Gates’ family and other prominent personages’ passionate eugenics pact. To coin Henry Kissinger, it is a pact geared to permanently removing useless eaters from civilization. When active genocide proves too hard, the only other way to guarantee society is purified is by ensuring no more recruits are born. Why not mis-described sterilizing immunization? Is there a more effective way?

Inheritance, the Prodigal Son and Interest in “Interest”

When I began composing articles for this website it was as if I was a literary infant. Only while I fondly look back at scribbles in dusty journals do I see the core that was me remains intact, unblemished. It is what I have become.  Notably writing projects have grown into something much more expansive; substantially more substantive in many instances, presumably because I am much more proficient at the art of journalism. Nevertheless echoes of past enlightened symmetry still tantalisingly haunt. Whilst die-hard readers used to my familiar elaborate prose have witnessed an evolution of sorts, the more conventional style of recent entries is no less controversial. They are controversial but not abnormal it might be argued.  Even so, rhetoric is regularly too far adrift of sensationalised reason to covet “normalcy” in any sense of the word. It could be said my writings propose a uniquely different perspective which in itself is conspicuous evidence of sovereignty “apud esse”; something all humans strive for to some degree, but oh so few attain. In celebration of my largely discarded history, I have decided to attempt to revisit the past. My intention is to make this piece shorter, simpler [can I say?] in festival of the old but not forgotten me.

Is it possible to effectively resurrect the past?

Well that question will be answered presently.

Reflecting on my journey to date, I recall how, in dull moments, I would instinctively jot down a line or two, a solitary paragraph and other evidence of burning thoughts. None of these were suitable as standalone products for ambitious journalistic campaigns, of course. Logic dedicated a “to be written” folder to these moments and, over time, this has gathered fragments like moss to the old miller’s stone. Given my aim to regenerate dormant thinking, the “to be written” folder seemed the most valid first port of call for this episode. It is definitely fitting that the origins of my resurrection are founded in the rediscovery of misplaced parchments. In this case the scrap I selected consisted of a single page upon which was scribed one line of text in addition to the title. Intriguingly, these coarsely jumbled words appeared to nonchalantly identify an apparently related “unrelated” coincidence. The crux of the observation posited an “irony” over Federal Reserve banknotes, which are subject to 3% interest from the issuer (United States of America), paid annually, The coincidence noted that America (after a historic referendum) also dedicates a minimum of 3% of the gross national budget to “defence” which, in this case, is attack (messianic wars “for peace”).

Above this poignant inscription was the demure title “Interest in “interest””, which seemed the most fetching at the time, though, other than the, I must say, rather cheesy pun, the original “point” is now completely lost to me. After earning the judicial reputation of being an unabashed merchant of “tough love”, I would hate my inquisition to form any bias towards fashionably calculated schemes that formularise common opinions on “things in general”. Persuading those of low vibrational frequency that the devil is in the detail goes beyond motive. That is my vocation and, thus, I recommend anyone ill prepared to consider everything to the “nth degree” is not in a viable position to validate or express truth. Perhaps this rather crass example may suffice to service the analogy?

When someone dies of a gunshot wound motivated by an aggressive attack what perpetrates the murder? Is it the gun inventor, designer, maker, owner or user with malice in his heart? Is the gun itself, the operator, the bullets that caused the fatal wound or the gunpowder that ignites deadly blows at fault? If the shooter is a soldier or policeman, for instance, do the “rules” for murder eerily change? Could we blame the environment, the timeline or engrained political intrigue?

And on and on we can debate.

Revisiting the past is one thing, but I don’t fancy repeating myself is very constructive. Whether produced by the Federal Reserve or not, money’s passé. We also all know it’s the root of all evil (although perhaps not “why” it’s the root of all evil). Many of my prior articles have touched on the topic. This one in particular goes some way towards exploring primary issues.  Nevertheless I concluded the standalone title “interest in interest” was insufficient for that cause. It needed to be widened or scrapped unless I chose a different path. Any form of censorship (however remote) is destruction of the past – hardly fodder for a celebration of reawakening. Therefore Integrity determined my only legitimate choice was to expand the title at all cost as I had no intention of wandering aimlessly in search of ambition. Fortunately “eureka” eruptions reward those with brilliance. What, lacking before, profoundly related to “interest” could be worthy enough for a role or roles in a high impact title? Thinking aloud, it came to me in a flash. Does not interest “prove” the justification for inheritance and ownership?  Inheritance is undeniably one of if not “the” foundation stone of profiting interests.

I would need to summon up a title profoundly deserving of these widened considerations. After much internal reflection, I did eventually find words that will hopefully fashion as a perfect compromise.  They are, in order, “Inherence, the Prodigal Son and Interest in ‘Interest””. This is the resulting effort that is designated as official title of this essay unless something obsessively changes the contextual direction of ideas and their natural progressions. Otherwise no further review is planned.

Now let me explain why the “prodigal son” was also selected for its part in the essential treatise theme. Intrinsically linked to inheritance, prodigal sons are no ordinary offspring. Therefore, simply, that was the “missing piece” I needed to complete the title. It also presented investigative goals worth chasing, investigation that needs to determine what makes these prodigal sons so special. Of course primary analysis did upturn the blissfully obvious. Basically, these male progeny are gifted enough to be cultivated, which is usually in the family direction.  Otherwise, why bother to cultivate? Way back, when elites ruled the world, families with “everything to lose” produced governors and gatekeepers for their kingdoms. Along the lines of this protocol, security over tenure became a family’s greatest priority and ensured at least one son was encouraged (putting it nicely) to enter the military at rank. Another would become a doctor or a priest (isn’t that odd?) and then the following (perhaps the most strategically important) would be groomed to act as lawyer, preferably under government. Black sheep or dropouts would eventually come round to becoming merchants, stock holders or artists. The rigours of this big, bad world ensure safe, easy options are usually preferred.

Before I press on with on with the good stuff, I need to do a little more reflection by way of background. People, I have noticed, have a fondness towards procrastination (mentioned last article too) and a crippling fear of criticism. Procrastination, at best, fuels truths-of-sorts. That is the reality and that is why I try my upmost not to procrastinate. It can be a hindrance because, through my personal discovery tour; I have found some values, ideas and beliefs I used to stand by were either flawed or false. Consequentially, many years ago, I used to regularly bloviate with erudite confidence. There was never anything more than “personal convictions” to back up my gift of the gab, but I rarely found anyone I met could contest my position on the state of things in general. More recently, I have become alert, ever wary of falling into the trap of believing my own bullshit. Criticisms (where valid) counter any opportunity for imperfect procrastinations to take hold, so I see these as causal blessings. Procrastinators, for the record, focus on symptoms or phantom symptoms in deference to causes. Truth givers expose the root.

Therefore if I am to do apt justice to “Inheritance, the Prodigal Son and Interest in “Interest”” all stones must be upturned so as not to grind out more unanswered, “impossible to resolve” niggling queries. I must, instead, disrobe all root causes to unveil the exhilarating detail. Thought and responding responses will require latitude, much latitude. Mountains of propagandas dating back to the dawn of time have had the mesmerising effect of misleading sane discovery to such a degree, befuddled judgments are the function of normalcy. Even some of the great minds of our era are consistently turned to fudge by certain conventions. This is why I focus on topics others simply wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole. True thinking outside of the box comes without a parachute. Even so, rather than drawing on possible conjectures as “sources of evidence”, my strategy (in motion) is to apply logic and purposeful reason to every concept I am at pains to illustrate.

Let us be sure where the “baseline” is. Currently materialist-atheist “edict” controls the way logic is directed. Per this “view”, the implication is purpose is a symptom compounded from random effects of existence, even though (as Rupert Sheldrake has wittily pointed out), by this account, more incontrovertible miracles were created at the dawn of time than Jesus could have ever fancied. (Alien to this mindset) in fact purpose must underline causes because existence was “crafted”. The evidence existence was crafted is found in its design, which is clear and unarguably transparent.

So to do justice to the quest, I may have to introduce suspects or considerations that have rarely or, perhaps, never been pondered before. All the little tweety birds that believe puffing various forms of political correctness is their branch to salvation beware, for this big bad eagle may swoop down and devour you and your branch whole. We should begin with no misconceptions. Those that initiated the process that conceived elitism (or, in other words, the hubris of “prison planet”) demonstrated extraordinary cunning. It seems obvious to me that, considering how the process has radically evolved (in the engineering sense), higher forces beyond this realm have had involvement every step of the way. Not dwelling on possible superstitions, the whys and the wherefores, however pertinent, I intent to expose the chassis of the fabric of the illusion that is today’s “reality”. Conspiracy networks have been installed so elegantly, it is as if they have been commissioned by God Almighty.

Before I discuss inheritance, it is important to review something much more primordial.  We take friendships for granted. They just happen. Or do they just happen? Our first friendships are with family or extended family. Managing relationships with our family members teaches us how to distinguish friends from enemies. These teach us politics (affairs of the people). They teach us who we can influence and who we will let influence us. A trade of sorts is communicated. Eventually we form close knit groups of likeminded kindred spirits. Perhaps not directly considered such, we are all elitist in the way we resolutely preserve our group cultures. When stretched out into the wider community and beyond, we expand into other political networks. Some present revolutionary, but not conflicting ideas.  These see us progress, in some cases. Some ideas are so common they become universalised. Politicians naturally capitalise on, exploit and manipulate these phenomena.

Eventually draconian laws are destined to twist what was original goodwill into all kinds of overt tyrannies in order to elevate elite elitist cultures. Laws have always been the basis for kingdoms. Under this principle, every king has ruling power. However, without friendships there would be no alliances to back the laws and politics that founded them would be rendered superfluous and obsolete. No king could rule. In addition, under these conditions, though commerce would be possible, other than as a tool of oppression, inheritance could have no functional purpose. It would also mean people would be forced to discover the truth if they were motivated that way. They could no longer rely on friends’ redigested second and third hand opinions that sounded right.

As it stands “Inheritance” is one of the golden keys to open Pandora’s Box.  In a distant era populated by long forgotten customs and attitudes, it was exclusively the domain of the elites. At that time land was free, commoners outside metropolises were largely ungoverned and there was no sense of ownership (per modern standards). Individuals congregated into clans and these became long standing settlements which then saw homesteads passed down from generation to generation. But there was no registered ownership. If some place was occupied and sympathetically unavailable, sound conscience determined it was off limits. When the “universalisation” of deeds of ownership tied to symptomatic inheritance of chattel began is hard to calculate. In “western society”, I would argue that the abolishment of “slavery” (social security) led to the effective enslavement of man. Inheritance then evolved to become a quasi-version of the “frills” of slavery. “Rights” would be proscribed by authorities unless aspects of commoners’ common law were considered relevant (to seamless elite governance of slaves). In this case any reflectively worthy laws were drafted as supplants to legislated corporate manifestos. It goes without saying administrators of guidelines were systemised lackeys incapable of virtuous judgement. Finally, courtesy of banking and insurers, everything could be “valued” and that “worth” represented by tokens of interest (whether that is gold/silver bars, coins or promissory notes).

In order to engage lawyers and accountants whose role (in the grand elites’ scheme) is to professionalise ownership, receipt of inheritance follows a litany of potential administrative hurdles, but I don’t wish to dwell on this. There is another internet resource I like to reference occasionally that specialises (in part) on whistle blowing messy probates, the fallout from inheritance. Pure Professional Journalism Gazette can be located here.

In addition, philosophy behind inheritance capitalises on the principle of appreciation or depreciation and this is clearly an expansion of the dependent interest bearing investment culture. Probate relies on belief in heirlooms, which are presumed to indefinitely financially mature. Government, per this reasoning, rakes in their “fair share” from the commerce evolution in taxes in order to theoretically provide ever improving infrastructures and representative management frameworks. Accommodating this theory, surpluses could be redistributed for other pressing voters’ needs. That is why I believe all governments (on paper, at least) are kept “in the reddeliberately. In fact, when truth is laid bare, government, though never limited, does little more than give inheritance necessary tinges of authenticity to make people believe in its credibility. If it is taxed, it “must be for real. Without profits, commerce becomes obsolete. Interest is, by circumstance, both a symptom of and agent in confirmation of profits.

Truth laid bare goes way beyond mere commerce and inheritance. The tyranny actually began with registered ownership because, without deeds, commerce is arbitrary. Barter doesn’t cater for profits. Here is why the imperialists concocted their “survival of the fittest” mantra and continue to lord it as nature’s divine plan. The fittest are considered the best at coveting what they have scavenged (the nice word for stole). I apologise for dispelling with the hocus-pocus, but acknowledgement of ownership as something that is righteous and Godly only grossly and deviously distorts reality in favour of tyranny against the divine. Aside from  modern day [ADL fabricated) Racism fraud, the reason certain peoples have been temporarily “classed” as savages is to remove any contest over conquered (stolen) land spoils (“animals” cannot own land). Notably in Africa, America and Australia, “white man” thieved most of the habitable land areas. Repatriation (a pathetic attempt at feigning “fairness”) in some cases has seen the return of lands considered commercially unviable. Even so, generally speaking, when it comes to origins of ownership, judicial mechanisms continue to work off the ludicrously partisan principle “finders’ keepers”.

The net effect of that is another of those atheistic miracles. Our impotent, voiceless God apparently blesses open sacrilege. Was the principle finders’ keepers ever to be condemned and abolished, commerce would cease to exist. This is a big statement. Some might contest it. Here’s an analogy which should amply validate its authority. I don’t own the royal grounds, approximating three square miles, close to the heart of Tokyo, Japan. Under the auspices of lack of ownership, no one would own the land. Therefore, I decree some legitimacy in laying claim on that which is not owned. Hypothetically, I could establish a real estate agency to sell off my theoretical acquisition. I may be able to attract teams of would be buyers. Yet, without binding contracts and infrastructures supporting them, verifiable presumption of intent to abide by the law, the land is worthless until someone or some group manufactures political legitimacy. The ancient Romans couldn’t give money away to the Britons because they did not believe in it.

The reason (under this system) ownership will never be abolished (although it may be restricted) is governments would have to rescind their slave master statuses in order to transform into arbitrators that truly work “for the people”. Currently populations are effectively forced to toil to survive. Those privileged enough to “own” sufficient land holdings supported by interest bearing investments probably haven’t the skills to become entirely self-sufficient. Thus, without government society would naturally function through the formation of brokered relationships that would need to leverage and harness social parasitism. According to today’s popular press (sponsored by corporate interests and governments who are in themselves giant corporations), people only want good jobs. People, by the same rose tinted reasoning, will do anything to keep their good jobs. Commerce needs labour to function. Indeed, for those that were (in society) to ever become self-sufficient, commerce would cease to be necessary. That lack of functional necessity could only be defeated by interest in collectables and other objet d’art which, though arguably functionally irrelevant, fuel a potentially ever-accruing “need for more”. I guess that is why we have collectors.

It is important to understand the relevance of commerce, because many “goods and chattels” from the inheritance perspective may be deemed valueless. The family’s pink plastic clock that ticked you to sleep as a baby is worth nothing (even though it may be priceless to you) compared against your departed father’s prestigious “medal winning” coin collection that you were never “allowed” to touch, which insurance would class as a valuable asset. Many factors can determine an heirloom’s worth. Rarity, age, condition, popularity affects status of all antique items. Statuses are groomed from fostered traditions. For instance, Caucasian Australian manufactured artefacts offered for sale would likely be priced at many multiples of any vaguely comparable Aboriginal counterparts. In line with this ideology, the essential education of all well-connected prodigal sons provides a vital comprehension of firstly how the system functions and then, as importantly, how stepping stones to credentials gift “keys to the kingdom”.

Unsurprisingly a correct (for purposes of social elevation) education is priced beyond the means of not-so-humble slaves, which proposes a vicious circle whereby only elite or “fortunate” working class families can avail the system. Indeed for the system (which some argue began with William Cromwell at Westminster) to permanently function as it is, the riff-raff could never be involved in any authoritative managerial capacity. So, with the exception of very occasional “pliable” geniuses, credentials of note are off limits to ordinary folks. Rebellious or revolutionary geniuses are invariably spurned by those that might have empowered them unless their significances were so timely that to trade would persuade the only logical course forward. The powers never favour constructive partnerships. That wick always burns fast and furious. Why would recalcitrant free thinkers ever be viscerally rewarded by a system that choses to repress or oppress most forms of independent thought?

From the (dare I say?) “Conspiratorial perspective”, certain specialised training qualifications that are destined to open doors to those prized “good jobs” are invariably only available to those with educational credentials usually off limits to working classes. Hindsight is a wonderful attribute. In many instances only those in the know (or, rather, with “connections”) have inside information as to which skills to acquire for guaranteed success. Thus, just about all “good jobs” are snapped up by exclusive circles privy to their occurrences. Propaganda permeates a much wider circle of influence which, in part, is designed to operationally program the masses. I can but assume the Clintons were firmly behind the cruel and childish media attacks on Chelsea as a young adult. The design (aided by unflattering images), in this case, was to chide ignorant people into “believing” she was “ugly” so as to ward off any potential for successful unsuitable suitors’ advances. Media tactics of this kind are regularly analysed by Jon Rappoport. I strongly recommend investigation of his writings.

Few seem to be able to come to terms with the extent of the complexity of propagandas. Perhaps this is because everyone attempts to deny their own relative indoctrination or, worse still, it is the summary evidence of their root systemisation. Propagandas are everywhere. They are not merely limited to the mainstream and institutionalised “sciences’ (sic). Much deceptive information has been generated about computer viruses, for instance. One of the great lies that seems as though it will stand the test of time forever is Pasteur’s germ theory. Germs, according to Pasteur, can invade and infect any body and this is completely untrue. On the back of the lie, scientists concoct legions of “organised germs” that conveniently follow the program. They label these mysteriously unidentified legions’ “viruses”. Of course, if medical evidence free of Pasteur’s contaminated propaganda was given the opportunity to incubate reasoned appraisal, results would radically dishonour current standard opinions in the same manner Bruce Lipton somehow defeated all biological cells.

As Pasteur was nothing short of an appendage of “corporate science” which had been set up by the Rothschild family in Paris in the late eighteenth century (just after the “revolution” – sic), any marketing device aiding the manufacture of arbitrary confusion to help everyone “believe” would be regarded as a godsend by those that presume they own the world. Their godsend in specific relation to the case I highlight is “computer viruses”. Computer viruses are not even remotely comparable to any medical counterpart, but propaganda agents don’t care. In fact origins of all computer viruses can be traced back to sponsored hackers testing security effectiveness of networked equipment, but that muddies the objective of paradigm synthesis. To the propagandist it only successfully sells the “concept” germs can and will invade and infect with impunity whether via the internet or other routes. The idea that anyone connected to humans is potentially “networked” with dangerously contaminated aliens is the perfect genre extension. Because, in this specific case, “viruses” (as labelled) do invade and infect technologies, the propaganda message would go a long way towards convincing shallow minds. I will leave the associated complex good/bad bacteria and strengthened/weakened immune systems’ discussion for another entry.

The great deception is to paint a computer virus as the principled copy of a medical virus.

Using established institutions to routinely dress false positives or negatives as “facts”, places the system in the supreme position of being able to present any fantasy as effective truth, no matter how fantastical. Providing data can be formally argued and expressed in particular ways, any antipathy of reality is up for believable persuasion. There are actually no laws of science (physics). There are only laws of existence (to the atheists’ dismay) which can theoretically be placed under scrutiny of sciences. An excellent example of how current etiquette can end up bamboozling itself is found in various expressions of interest that emerged considering the effectiveness of a new energy generating prototype heralding from Italy a few years ago. I have lost source details, but can verify corporate backers in favour of the machine presented analytical notes interpreting data that illustrated the device was going to be a magnificent success. Competitors insisted the exact same data was unrequited “proof” the machine would never work by their account. Would be investors coming somewhere in the middle couldn’t or wouldn’t speculate either way. Similar “analysis” has been made regards the Bosnian “Pyramids”. The duly diligent will see it everywhere.

In addition, to aid propagandists’ purposes, word values (such as “gay”) are routinely changed or even reversed in order to lambast popular interpretations. Late Nicolai Levashov (his family incidentally claims he was “murdered by Zionists” in 2012) and other genre academics have argued this restructuring of language began in earnest in mother Russia just after the 1917 bankers’ invasion. Let’s face it; “interest” is a profoundly positive word that surely inspires persuasive popularity. That is why it was given to “utopian” banking commissions (which will always be viewed in an eternally positive light) in my opinion. Finally, those that do not consider insistence on and observance of balanced truthfulness is the only viable promotional standards’ benchmark are propagandists, whether they acknowledge the fact or not. Propagandists are in the business of manufacturing beliefs, period. Truth that doesn’t support or actually impedes the manufacturing process is unwelcome. Any devices, such as changing word values, fake science and so forth are more than welcome. Discerning would-be “Manchurian Candidates” is trickier, but, I would imagine those that assure religious adherence to product “use by” dates are well and truly in the crisis zone. The vegetarian that “doesn’t like” meat isn’t far behind.

Money is only supported by the “belief” in its value. That particular belief has become the most potently powerful and universally entrancing factor in the control of man. Thus, we must acknowledge the scripting of believable beliefs is far more virulent than truths that might support or aid acknowledgement. For example, I wonder if any believer (in money) has considered the fact that financial optimism provides fodder for wars. When the Industrial Revolution was in full swing the 1890’s saw boom times. Boom times make babies; manpower for the First World War? “Roaring” ‘20’s clearly provided “stock” for the Second World War (Germany was billed to “lose”, so their peoples were given fertility stemming poverty on the back of harsh reparations. 1930’s optimism was in preparation for the kingdom of Germany to be rebuilt as a new republic [styled on America] when the war was won).

There are always going to be inconsistencies, such as the infamous 1960’s flower power movement. This is a paradox because it was the only genuine peoples’ revolution in living memory. No attempt was made to synthesise prosperity in the 1970’s because weaponry is becoming so sophisticated, “ape” operators will eventually be found unnecessary (beyond culling populations). Were a few of those bygone hippies “tuned in” enough to realise “Interest” is the nemesis of sovereignty? Being a hippy was all about recognising individual sovereignty. The 3% the Federal Reserve skims off every dollar assures each bill in circulation is worth 97 cents (presuming “government” doesn’t take a cut too). Therefore the owner either has to front the loss or is forced to speculate or trade in order to recoup 3% or more. Imagine the potential for manipulation if Bitcoin or any other e-currency takes hold. That is how the notion of profits was born. The land that is the royal grounds of Tokyo is worthless unless it is rated and valued. It has long been presumed that “highest bidder” nominations assure correct marketplace values, but this isn’t necessarily so.

Abundance does not come without a “price” to those that dedicate themselves to controlling humanity. Population swells lead to the collectivisation of giant metropolises. Without incessant propagandas that “define” normalcy, the “stranger” might persuade “influence charisma” of comparable or greater power than corporate bread winners. From that, a rogue messiah or “anti-Christ” could emerge. It is more than possible; probable even. If so, of course there are many ways to quickly dispel unrest. Leaders can be branded occultists, sexual deviants or, worse still, insane.  Anyone fetching that positive diagnosis can be liberally carted off to a very unhealthy institution and indefinitely detained without recourse. As everyone that used to be “evil” now has some sort of psychiatric disorder, biased and unfair claims against can be sinisterly effective. How well did Jesus fare against the Pharisees in face of the cross? How are mental illnesses “healed”? Well to answer that, there is a litany of tested drug cocktails perfect at prepping would-be “Manchurian Candidate” assassins without causes from recalcitrant, inspirational free-thinkers.  Two birds killed with one stone, maybe?