When “Belief in the Saviour” Teases Corrupt Zeal

Traditionally I have regularly released a Christmas or New Year’s thematic to coincide with the so-called festive season. 2018 has proven to be a latecomer, but I refuse to entirely relax standards. Each winter solstice cycle I increasingly notice how little of Christ [from the Greek] is present in Christmas. For instance, there is now more or less a complete void once occupied by goodwill.

Satan devoured it,” howl the sanctimoniously superstitious

Yet superstitions should never be entirely overlooked. Every reflective proverb invariably contains a grain or more of truth. Current advertising beginning as early as “New Year”, embers of the “Phoenician” commerce coup ignited under concessions of Santa around the turn of the nineteenth century. Great threat Cossack Russia helplessly conquered and with America “under administration”, imperialism was to become the unchallenged voice of reason. Maybe Ebenezer Scrooge wasn’t such a bad stick after all, but I will elaborate on this sentiment in due course.

Before I expose the real corruption of Christ, it is important to clear the air over Santa’s ambiguous comeuppance. Back in Rococo times the ice countries may as well have been classed as the known third world. Few were hardy enough to brave the cold, but for occasioned explorers. These courageous travellers were at liberty to export remote tales of old, particularly when absent of viable bounty. In Santa’s case it seems that two convenient folklores converged as one. Whether any original account has been authentically preserved is unlikely, but, suffice to say, vagrant Norwegian sagas concerning an odd mystic figure (elf?) had proliferated out to “the West” by 1815 or ’20.

Historic development of the Western version is much easier to chart. By reputation, one of America’s New York newspapers made timely broadsheet announcements in December 1773 and the follow year. According to promotional content, Dutch families seasonally congregated to honour Saint Nicholas (a monk renowned for his selfless distribution of charity). Plausibly, theorists claim that Saint Nicholas was issued the pet name Sinter Klaas in the local dialect pronunciation. Evolution to Santa Claus is logically coincidental. Back in the early nineteen century, it should be noted that popular drawings presenting Sinter Klaas in contemporary situations barely resemble modern Santa. That commercial effigy is believed to have been the consequence of a life-sized model placed behind a Philadelphia general store window in 1841.

Scandinavian tales refer to a mystic figure that helped the children, although Christkind (Christ’s child) or Kris Kringle is usually considered the parallel German version. The original name (the one sometimes quoted is not authentic) of the historic figure is perhaps lost to time, but I calculate it was the missing ingredient that promulgated a natural evolution to Santa Claus. My use of the word “natural” here is figurative, of course, as there is a sinister side to this account too. Following Scandinavian myths, from around 1820 American businesses heavily invested in Christmas shopping advertising, strategically placed around heart-warming ditties (one can but assume were) inspired by the Norwegian mystic. Printed message cards were to come in en-masse from the late nineteenth century onwards.

Popular iconography attributed to a North Pole setting was introduced (in the West) by Clement Clark Moore, whose 1822 poem “An Account of a Visit from Saint Nicholas” apparently featured quaint eye-catching illustrations. Thomas Nast, cartoonist for Harper’s weekly, adapted visualisations for a feature spread in 1881 which made popular acclaim. Embedded traditions of present day rotund gentleman clad in cheery red suit gestated in the 1890’s. Promptly exploited by the Salvation Army, homeless men dressed in seasonal costumes were commissioned to venture out with the aim of collecting funding donations.

Masonic involvement in the creation of the United States of America is beyond dispute. Whether fabled Illuminati power brokers were the key instrumental agents will possibly never be authentically known or provable. What is unarguably clear is the American union was never set up for the people or, rather, if it was, “the people” were undoubtedly the select few. Propagandists went to work in earnest well before the United States was ratified as “one”. Corresponding messages promoting Christmas spirit in favour of commerce highlighted the ambitions of those that established the new republic. This style of subliminal tradition persevered throughout the occurring human rights’ transformation, perhaps persuasively haunted by Charles Dickens 1843 masterpiece “A Christmas Carol”. Incidentally, British Dickens had also written his Parish Boy’s Progress (more commonly known as Oliver Twist) serial 1837-39 which coincided (sic) with the Abolition of Slavery Act (1837).

I wrote about the truth behind abolition last article and inasmuch stated that no philanthropic goodwill should be attributed to the end of slavery. Human rights were reduced to tatters in order to fortify the needs of burgeoning commerce. One of the significant causal effects, in addition to labour exploitation, unprecedented spikes in crime and prostitution, was the emergence of numerous social charities. I have written about charities independently before too. If governments were truly set up exclusively for the people, then each charity must be viewed as a breakdown of order that highlights supreme jurisdictional incompetence. Today there are supposedly tens of millions of charitable causes which emphasises the ineptitude of governmental social charters. But there is another side to the conspiracy. Great writers like Dickens rarely (if ever) meaningfully expose the indelible link between charity and trade. Charities usually place funds in the care of the banking system available to purchase goods or services before converting them into “aid”. Funds not needed “in the field” are invariably locked into attractive interest bearing long term deposits. British “custodian of charities” (a corporate collective catering for tens of thousands of organisations) used to be listed second place below British Telecom at the stock exchange, so it is a lucrative cash cow.

Dickens’ squint vision is enough to convince me he worked for the overlords. Why else would have he been allowed to make fame and fortune? If his writings had viciously attacked “the system”, no one would know of them today. Without doubt his “hallmark” powerfully creative style made endorsement decision making easy. His deeply human approach surely would have been considered gravy topping by his endorsers. For example, “A Christmas Carol” (or “Scrooge”) did highlight the plight of the working classes, but the manner as to how merchants and those that governed exploited working classes was matter of fact, the way things are. In effect, Dickens ended up posthumously begging for charity from his betters. That was the limit of his militancy. Indeed, in the Victorian age knowing your place had been a very long standing belief attached to birth provenance (i.e. the result of karmic deliverance). Perhaps this is why he was allowed to paint such a bleak picture. Other of his novels feature “poor houses” (paid slavery) and debtors’ prisons, so it would be unfair not to lightly applaud aspects of his pioneering effort towards social conscience.

In fact he was far from the only dissenting voice of that era. Beginning with comparatively humble numbers from the late eighteenth century onward, by high Victorian times published attacks on “the system” had just about reached fever pitch. A significant side effect to all this is worth exploring. There have been many revisions of the English Bible, from the seventh century AD. A formal Revised Standard Version of the New Testament was first published in 1881 and this was largely a consequence of inertia of “social conscience movements” (notably who were alarmed by the excess of prostitution) in my opinion. British politicians such as William Gladstone expressed their dedication to God (apparently regularly administering sermons to fallen women), although it seems ironic that these individuals have been responsible for imposing some of the most acrid and draconian legislation on the people.

Cultivation of various popular “beacons of hope” was burgeoning commerce’s key strategy investment geared to combating radical dissent in such forms as suffrage protest. Christmas Santa was one such icon. It seems to me that it has been no accident seasonal spirit appears to engage commerce at any opportunity. In that capacity, Santa is the Christmas star perched on a commerce peak. Dickens’ criticism of Scrooge’s lack of commercial goodwill by not paying staff adequately empowered seasonal trading. For lack of better words, when [otherwise] slaves are affluent enough, they can buy more goods and chattel to ensure business perpetually booms. Broadsheets promoted charitable initiatives favouring trade long before the US republic (1789) was established. Santa, by hook or by crook, became a convenient figurehead or mascot. However, review of naming protocols places dark questions regards the ethics and ambitions of those that pioneered the Grotto cult. There is more to Santa Claus than is obvious.

Far from being a saviour, he has been known to splinter families consumed by obsessive greed. Those without funds sufficient for merriment (as Dickens bitterly highlights) are ostracised by “goodwill”. There is a giant clue as to why this is so, but I first need to provide a little background before I detail it. My other website offers many articles that cover esoteric and paranormal affairs. Coincidentally Satan was the feature of one long essay there. I say coincidentally because it is fairly well known that Santa also happens to be an anagram of Satan. In normal circumstances one would put the fact down to quirks of language, but can we be sure connections are accidental or arbitrary here?

Explanations will become a little complex because I first need to allay popular confusion over origins and meaning of Satan. In fact, while I am about it, I may as well cover doppelganger Lucifer too. Satan, for instance, is a very ancient term that stretches back long prior to Atlantis. Sanskrit is the closest dialect I have found representative of the “universal” first language that failed to survive Atlantis’ downfall (hinted at in biblical Genesis’ Tower of Babel). In that regard, perhaps all words were originally collective monotones and, with this in mind, Satan conveniently breaks into “sat” and “an”. In Sanskrit pronunciation reflectively impacts word values, so “sat” and “an” could each be attributed to mean many different things. Therefore, in the interest of correctness, I have had to draw on inherent sources to establish compelling historic and interpretative basis from considerations.

“An” is the easy part. Several ancient tongues use the syllable to signify “Almighty God”. In combination with Almighty God, various meanings of “sat” might satisfy differing wider metaphoric interpretations. Though the fact appears to have escaped surviving chronicles, Satan was the first star to ever bless the cosmos (actually initially revered as the Blessed Star). All stars deliver light. In spiritual context, light is sometimes called logos (which is the Greek word for information). Spiritually, “logos” extends way beyond mere information. It is the essence of truthful purity or, in other words, the word of God. “Sat” is the Sanskrit equivalent of this conceptualisation. Lucifer admirably compares. That name derives from the Latin and means “light” (lux) “standard” (fer). Morning Star (Lucifer) competing with the sun (Ra) as it rises based on biblical Isaiah’s (an unrepentant Pharisee) radical sermon is generally regarded as the significant origin of the usage.

Also worthy of mention, Akhenaten’s Amon (usually erroneously referred to as Amen) conspicuously forms an “Almighty God” (A-n) sandwich casing “m’o” (divine record) filling. Thus, strictly speaking Satan, Lucifer and Amon/Amen all mean the same thing (more or less), which is bringer of good news. Actually, wasn’t that what they called Jesus too? Nevertheless, I have explained elsewhere how the general message over time has been twisted into opposite meanings by miscreants with rogue agendas. Today the direct effect is both Satan and Lucifer have been reversed from bringers of good news to evil omens. Specifically, Satan [in Hebrew tongue] simply means accuser. The development of Satan as “the tempter” did not emerge until the late sixteen century, though attributing philosophies were clearly embedded in Martin Luther’s earlier rhetoric. Luther (himself a Jesuit) strongly influenced contemporary masonic alliances. Masonry is not the sinister cabal delineated by superstition. Merchants would normally associate themselves with one group or another in order to network out of trading necessity. The massively beneficial spin off was it made collusion and coordinated commerce strategies possible.

Not all collaborations were gracious. When stakes were high, gross acts of tyranny or injustice were sometimes deemed “end justifying”. One such conspiracy toppled Britain’s constitutional monarch Charles I, who was beheaded on 30th January 1649 as a consequence. Even so, after that atrocious standard had been set, beginning with his son puppet king Charles II’s reinstatement, the universal demise of sovereign royal power is probably best marked by Catherine “the Great” (no wonder they call her great) of Russia’s turbulent reign. Violent anarchism was an offshoot of that operation. Since Michael Romanov’s (nephew of Ivan the Terrible) 1613 accession to the Russian throne, there had always been disturbance with Cossack settlers (displaced Polish serfs who termed themselves “free men”). In accordance, numerous popular uprisings against authorities have been reported from 1591. Out of all these, it is the 1768 Ukrainian (Koliyivshchyna) religious massacre that probably most pertinently marks an authority shift. Reputation says killing was sparked by Catherine the Great’s “Golden Charter” (1765) which enabled retired colonel and cleric Maksim Zalizniak’s ambitions. Their joint mission was dedicated to purging Catholics and other religious minorities.  Politically correct historians are quick to denounce the Golden Charter (which also targeted Jews) as “utter fantasy” in order to preserve the queen’s “spotless” reputation.

Encyclopaedia Britannica’s first edition is dated 1770. From 1770-75 Russia is proclaimed the world’s greatest nation. By 1776 she may as well have been a sickly dog.  Many theories attribute reasons leading to the country’s downfall, but it seems to me that government ownership of the Orthodox Church from 1721 marked the beginning of the end so to speak. Post revolution “Communist” Jew Leon Trotsky’s unrelenting all-reaching attack on that administration was certainly no coincidence. Populations had been galvanised by the church. Replace it with alternative convenient social apparatus and you have society in your pocket. Russians were (and perhaps still are) extremely parochial and rather superstitious. This is well highlighted by the way they celebrate Christmas. According to legend, Babouschka (old woman or granny) misled the three kings (search for Christ) by giving the wrong directions. The Russian birth date for “Jesus’” is 6th January but festivities honour Babouschka’s eternal regret for her deceit.

Historians might convincingly argue fledgling United States of America’s journey to superpower status began in 1776 (phoenix rising from mother Russia’s ashes?). Constitutional democracy ended in 1789 when the republic (in Philistine Greece and Italy’s wake?) was formed (and currency changed), but it took until 1864 (ushering in the 14th Amendment to the constitution) for government to be reduced to a corporation. Commerce was the primary reason the United States was formed but it took the best part of a century (1776-1864) for satanic agents to exact their full plan. Today all governments (and their tax offices) are corporations and that is why the modern world is held to ransom by merchant bankers. I find it mildly ironic that it is in the powers’ best interests for people to “wake up” to truth which is of next to no advantage to egregious saviours’ causes. This suggests, at the very least, that all (or the majority of) revolution philosophies have been sponsored by the precise same powers that impose tyranny. These false rites of passage were sponsored because the deceivers knew they were guaranteed dead ends.

To define true evil, I regularly reference a quote attributed to the great sage Krishna “Spirituality (impetus behind creation) brings to freedom, whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What better way to paralyse than by introducing appealing commerce. Humanity would not be able to resist aiding and abetting the devil (d-evil). I don’t refer to the satisfaction of genuine “needs” here, although commerce can accommodate those too. No, here I exclusively identify non-essential extras; frills of commerce. Some argue that the introduction of pomp surrounding royalty (which has endured so long) is pointless. Lemurian monarchs for periods that precede historic record were visually indistinguishable from the people. Very ancient kings were blessed with God-like powers. They could be distinguished by deed. Today certainly, beyond their overstated assigned status and privileged upbringing, royals are no different to the everyman. At Christmas, pomp and celebration of non-essential extras is now encapsulated by iconic smirking Santa which suggests it is those behind commerce that crafted the whole idea of aristocratic superiority.

Is the clue in Santa’s name; perfect anagram of Satan? By the time of this red frocked (isn’t the devil usually depicted coloured red?) tempter’s universal notoriety, negative connotations of Satan were firmly entrenched. Indeed, so much so no one had heard of the Blessed Star (in relation to the creation of our universe) by then. Such is the case today as well of course. I presented some detail in relation to the truth (and reasoning behind it) that negative Satan was actually originally the mispronunciation of “Saturn” (from medieval times, although I think this reflects attitudes under Prophet Zoroaster thousands of years before) in this article. “Design” of Santa appears to vaguely follow the Babylonian Horus myth. Indestructible God could only be chopped up and hidden. In this instance “An” has been remorselessly sliced in two, “n” crudely wedged between “sa” and “t”. “A” brings up the rear and represents perennial impotence of spirituality under Santa’s spell. God is vanquished (decapitated) and his wisdom (sat) corrupted.

But for Babouschka, Christmas (Epiphany) would be mostly a hangover from the Pagan era. Evergreen trees (in particular) represent celebration of the winter solstice. From time memorial, tradition has always seen exchange of gifts, but pagans honoured their harvest, so communities would contribute fresh fruits and vegetables for the benefit of society. “The Feeding of Five Thousand” New Testament parable was scripted by Mark (or Marcus, a Roman aristocrat) and therefore one should question its purpose all the more. Though communal sharing of fish and loaves suggests so, it is unlikely Jesus (Josephus) ever administered a true harvest festival dedicated to the winter solstice. The Romans, on the other hand, did worship solar cycles. Sun-day is a tribute to that legacy. Per context, the alert may struggle to fathom why I bother to discuss this now, given Jesus’ notorious “Jewish” status. Let me explain why. Long prior to Roman involvement, Judaism had split in two. City folks followed autocratic regimes promulgated by those generally known as Pharisees. It is a style of “order” remains alive and well today, underpinning up-to-date management of global affairs. Back then remote, displaced tribes were guided by (what the right-wingers’ would term) superstitious philosophies which prepared for different “ways of life”.

Their brand of raw spirituality was in fact encapsulated by the essence of numerous of splinter groups and these had journeyed out to the four corners of the globe in search of paradise (colloquially referred to as Promised Land). One such autonomy was the foundation of ancient druids (not even vaguely similar to garish abuse, late eighteenth century neo-druidism). Rural “Essene” Jews were labelled Gnostics for a while. Though historians remember it as a new tradition from the time of Jesus, it is likely the 570BC exodus to Ireland (Promised Land designate) consisted of likeminded parties of anti-Levite (Pharisaic law makers) “revolutionaries”. These embers of civilisation plausibly could have “morphed into” the later druidic tradition, made more notorious by Avalon (spiritual centre and first mystery school?), which is located in southern England. If memory serves me correctly, America’s Pilgrim Fathers formally constituted a southern English gathering in search of purity. The point I am trying to make is there has been a persisting religious dichotomy ever since man reflected on his divinity. Judaism, God forbid, is probably one of the better examples of that

Celebration of the solstices seems a likely component of Gnostic tradition. Unfortunately, other than newly found (and possibly censored) bundles of esoteric texts hidden in Dead Sea catacombs and other discreet places, evidence of that faith was destroyed long ago. Neo-druids make a big hullaballoo over solstice traditions whereas I suspect the Gnostics treated these occasions as opportunities to educate. What better way to manufacture goodwill while celebrating nature could there be than a harvest festival? The idea of community sharing for everyone’s benefit is instilled in “The Feeding of Five Thousand” parable. Did Mark’s account confuse a solstice event? Perhaps we’ll never know, but, per context, the fish and loaves are distinct spiritual symbols and shouldn’t be viewed liberally. Celts (original druids) in particular revered divinity as something directly attributed to creative potence. They determined that all life came from primordial waters (something modern science propagandises?). If primordial waters constitute God’s physicality, then fishes’ mastery of oceans must be inspirationally hallowed. The Lord’s Prayer “praises God for our daily bread”.

Tribes, such as those that became the druids, who didn’t revere pharisaic order, separated and found new havens (free of tyranny) to root. It is difficult to pinpoint the precise transition which is the branch that became modern day Judaism. Hebrew was originally a cut down cosmic script. For instance, additional unknown letters are occasionally seen interspersed with Hebrew on downed alien spaceships’ insignia. It is known that today’s long standing Yiddish culture backed off New Hebrew because Old Hebrew was insufficient for competent business communication. The “pointing” of Hebrew text (which in practicality adjusts for a new language) possibly coincided with first world universal adoption of stamped currency (legal tender). Accurate dates are deliberately vague on origins of pointing; maybe 12th, 13th or 14th century depending on opinions. Does this vainly cover up the Khazarian Yiddish pact emanated from the Ukraine? As an aside, though the Ukraine is sometimes volunteered, it could not have possibly ever been fabled Khazaria as that land mass is submerged under oceans today. There is however compelling innuendo that posits for a plausible case recommending the Ukraine is viewed as the motherland by certain estranged Pharisees.

Few bother to even attempt to comprehend the severe civil consequences of legal tender. Enslaved populations are the product of oppressive and tyrannous welfare states which cannot exist unless supported by currency. Therefore, industrialist vipers initially introduced serfdom gradually, confusing the “free” into believing that this was an effect of their zealous benevolence. Once everyone was “captured”, oligarchs expanded traditional uses of prisons for purposes of “containing” those whom they did not want to socially enable (crude justifications supported by laws came later). Bonded slavery became the only viable social security option for those displaced by war, famine or for other reasons.

Truth surrounding vile treachery of the Magna Carta (marking the point at which silver currency exploded) is obscured by cheery tales of Robin Hood and his band of crafty thugs. As a treaty, it wasn’t a charter of goodwill towards the people. It in fact was open theft of free lands and the negotiated common rights of man. Courtesy of the Magna Carta, the vast majority of our modern populations could not live off the land effectively now, even if we were forced to do so and that is why industrialists lord over the document’s prowess so heartily. Rich or poor, mighty or lowly, we have all by some measure been transformed into slaves of currency. They say money makes the civilised world go round. That is why those with the most money invariably have all the privileges.

Where it came from God only knows, but there is a tragic old wives’ tale that supposes the ills of humanity are the fault of the Midas effect. Those with wealth are singled out as evil doers even though everyone (without exception) is greedy (sometimes euphemised as will to survive). The humble do not know extravagance so they neither desire nor solicit it. Most elites merely exploit human nature to the hilt, though they may not be fully cognisant of the fact. The reason Santa has become so popular is he epitomises the averice of the masses. That is more than amply highlighted in Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol”. Goodwill is leveraged to such effect that crippled “Tiny Tim” deserves to have the litter of his family’s desires steeped on him at Christmas for merely existing. Of course this selfish anthem ignores those hard to rectify gaping double standards. Why would “rich” Scrooge bestow gifts on relative strangers in place of his own loved ones? The real issue, how Tiny Tim’s father persevered under such irresponsible employment terms, is not discussed.

Well, they didn’t have unions then”, screams a heckler

Incorrect, but it will take an eternity for sovereign man to grow a backbone. The power of labour values ironically has always been very much in the hands of the people. If everyone refused work and put death as the preference over slavery, currency would have been rendered valueless from conception and commerce would have never commenced (in the known sense). From the point currency was introduced, a utopian objective has been to shackle the broad masses. Peer group infiltration and targeted populism were the chosen control strategies (branded psyops) used to fulfil the objective. From the day men communicated with each other, money (cuts of silver, gold talents, precious beads) and other arbitrary tokens of value have always been used to supplement barter trade.

Currency is different. Units are stamped by (and the overriding possession of) an administrative authority. Originally that would have been a constitutional royal. Now stock ownership is hybrid. Who is this Federal Reserve? Those that use the merchandise are subject to governing philosophies and rules. A dollar cannot morph into a million units of value because “someone” decides this is so, whereas administrative overseers might revalue a dollar if they decided the act was politically expedient. Germany’s inflation was a deliberate act. Other competing paper currencies were only partially backed by gold, but the illustrious Federal Reserve turned a blind eye. Whilst apparently contractually bound as servants (polite word for slaves) of government, they were able to turn a blind eye because they own all “backed” circulated money.

Wholesale cash enterprises were developed first by the Greeks and then by the Romans, even though the oldest surviving currency (assuming science is correct) originates from Russia. Subsequent European coinage values were extensions of the Roman legacy. It would be hard to formally prove (particularly as reference maps show Philistinia approximates the modern Palestinian territory region), but logic supposes that the Greeks and Romans were descendants of relocated Philistines (tall pale skinned warriors). Retreating from defeat by Babylonian Pharaoh and “Jewish” King David, Philistines first settled in Greece (on the doorstep of the Middle East). Since “great” Alexander’s conquest to rule the world ran out of steam, Greek politics apparently favoured secular complacency over global conquest. Hamstrung industrialists shifted their affairs to Italy and, over several centuries, built sufficient military infrastructure to commit to their globalist ambitions once more.

Incidentally, not at all Middle Eastern in appearance, then Babylonian peoples would have been classed as “Caucasians” by today’s sciences. Therefore notorious King David would have been a white man. Though only circumstantial evidence supports claims he was a Pharaoh, inherent sources advise me information is relatively accurate (i.e. the wrong pharaoh is referenced as culprit), which places grave questions as to the authenticity behind the popular legacy of Israel of course. History is far from circumspect here. For example those dreadful “Greek” Hyksos Kings that “conveniently” appeared to take rule when Babylon was lacking authority were likely Philistines, yet Josephus eerily reports them as Israelites. I say these were the first usurpers; these were Pharisees who support a fabricated Levite Alta ego.

By deduction, this would mean the “great” Caesar was a Philistine as well. Limited writings about him present a grave paradox. According to surviving texts, he was some kind of popular miracle working Ben Hur. Such are the qualities of his proposed divinity; some might rightly be compelled to believe he was Jesus. Of course this adds to the case that persuades Mark was a Roman aristocrat who cast Jesus in the Homeric style, perhaps even as an attempt to preserve the image of Caesar. The evocation would have made both instantly popular figures even if real lives didn’t quite live up to the reputation. Infiltration of peer groups and targeted populism is achieved in one fell swoop. More evidence is as follows. Peer group infiltration is embodied by Mark “Iscariot’s” treacherous conversion to Gnosticism (and later St Paul’s Damascus Road epiphany). There is no more popular false occult icon than Jesus.

Prognosis therefore is depressingly melancholy. Beyond the use of occasional repeated proverbs, not a single book found in the New Testament even vaguely resembles authentic Essene philosophy, including “John”. Scholars that first take the plunge and brave any of the Dead Sea Scrolls’ codexes are quick to notice the profound intellectual depth of content (making embedded philosophies extraordinarily hard to interpret correctly). Gospel writer Mark was Roman, Luke Greek and Matthew was a cosmopolitan Jew and obvious agent of the Pharisees. Enigmatic John didn’t exist, but the name (in its use) implies “God’s secretary”. His, the Fourth Gospel, was dictated by Josephus (as Jesus) through brother-in-law scribe Lazarus. One word only of Jesus’ personal volume has survived. Someone (perhaps many) in authority knows the truth about this.

Jesus’ own gospel was purposefully destroyed and the celebrated surviving second century papyrus was not a copy. It is a forgery. If it had been authentic, how could the document have dodged Philistine Constantine’s mighty fourth century purge?  Outright censorship of texts that contradicted or impeded Sol Invictus faith was the only literary amnesty of his inquisition. Catholicism’s Papacy was the removed Roman monarchy; therefore it was also yet another Philistine/Pharisee offshoot. The reason St Paul (author of New Testament Corinthians, Romans and so on) is occasionally recognised as the first pope (and last apostle) is to give his detestable writings (which smother any occasional glint “free of Romanisation” emulating the conscience of Jesus) greater credibility (and popularity, of course). Paul’s calculated role generally seems to suggest sour grapes after good times gone awry. Should the “Ideal” Jesus have gracefully “wallpapered” the uncomfortable political “marriage” between the Pharisees and de facto Royalty?

Look, I’m not sure when the Sanhedrin originally came into being or whether it really matters, but I notice a familiar pattern with “world affairs” stretching back at least the most part of two and a half thousand years. History informs me the Romans conquered lands located in the region now called the Middle East. Their haul included Israel (conquered by Assyrians centuries before). A consequence of one of the first acts of power was to usher in hybrid Arab (ethic nomads that roamed Aram or were these Assyrians or even Phoenicians?) royals to rule over Judea (separatist Southern Israel). First “despot” of the official Promised Land Moses (who compares well against England’s Oliver Cromwell) never referred to arbitrary bodies when making decisions. Tradition (after the burning bush) revered him as the direct link to God. All great prophet kings follow identical protocol, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Noah and the rest. Their decisions were their own and these “commandments” were a testament upholding their uniformly breath taking “greatness”. Nevertheless, when the Sanhedrin (or royal court) emerged sovereign rule was doomed to wither. Under Israel’s Roman occupation, that evolution was furiously ignited.

Though government is meant to be a mix of identities that reflect the goodwill of society, by reputation decision making almost always errs towards right wing (fascist) mindset. Values imposed by Sanhedrin courts depressingly crafted that motif

Reflecting on contemporary politics of Jesus’ age, overbearing Roman authority paid lip service to the whims of their puppet Arab monarchs provided they observed all the wishes of the Pharisees (who took the high seat in the Sanhedrin). That said, certain Roman emperors didn’t see things their way. Look how these (such as Caligula and Nero) have been “painted” (i.e. utter fabrication) by “history”. Judea was abandoned (allegedly) after the 66-69AD siege of Jerusalem (a chain reaction sparked by earlier infractions under Nero). Within moments of the exodus a new fully fledged “Christian” hierarchy pops up in Alexandria. Infrastructure is so strong; its governing church is effectively born as a corporation. Therefore, transferring authority to Constantinople was child’s play after the papacy was formally established in the late fourth century.

Emergence of this virgin Catholic Church exactly coincides with the shocking disappearance of the great Roman Empire. Over several centuries, the same Catholic Church made a bee-line to exert control over every single credible European monarchy. This is more than amply highlighted by records of battles against the Merovingian kings, which included the calculated murder of Dagobert II. The Catholic Church had become (by accident or design) a sort of universal Sanhedrin, which is made all the more interesting because the Jewish version abandoned its administrative authority after the second temple (though some argue it never existed) was “allegedly” levelled by fire. Thus far I have contemplated numbers of suggestions that could never be “proven”, but could it be argued the Nicolaitans were instrumental at re-establishing the defunct Sanhedrin apparatus in Constantinople?

There is more fuel for the fire, if we move the clock forward a bit. King Henry VIII of England did the unthinkable in 1534. After a bitter divorce with Spanish royal Catherine of Aragon, he excommunicated the pope and formed his own Church of England. That is why the vicious catholic versus protestant wars persisted long after his death. Thomas Moore chose death in absence of moral sovereignty, but the rot had begun to set in long before, even while bonny Henry was still in power. The Roman “Sanhedrin” had only been temporarily usurped by the monarch. It wasn’t long before Henry was surrounded by pious advisors, such as prominent “world’s richest man” Cardinal Woolsey. Only a smidgen over a century after Henry’s desperate act, pharisaic authorities decided they needed to well and truly shore things up (and claim deserved revenge). This culminated with the execution death of Charles I in 1649 mentioned earlier, of course.

For the first time in history (unlike the Greek and Roman Republics before) a civilian government shielded power beneath “protector” Cromwell, but fame went to his head and he proved more deistic than any king. That is the ostensive reason behind the government’s swift (1660) re-establishment of the British monarchy, which remains intact today. It was deemed an essential safety measure against any parochial ruling authority. King William’s 1696 rushed though Bill of Rights amply acknowledges the viperous nature of man (particularly when given responsibility). To the best of my knowledge, every subsequent constitution (such as America’s) has built in its own bill of rights. For the record, though we have been programed to believe that royal executive power was devoid of peer oversight prior to corporate takeover, the myth simply isn’t true. Monarchs were presumed appointed by God (perhaps after Moses) and, as such, bound to honour their constituents. Suffice to say some kings turned out more attentive than others. That in mind, when factoring in the emergence of outsourced legislation via organs such as the Sanhedrin, the deep question I find rather hard to resolve is “who was the last true king?”

Who is the rightful king is important. Gospel writer Matthew’s biblical genealogy was aimed at promoting Jesus as the hereditary Messiah (priest-king or “Christ” subject to certain terms and conditions), but was it David or Zechariah (Jesus’ uncle) that established precedence? Zechariah was not a pharaoh nor did he have any conceivably legitimate claim to Babylonian rule. Pharaoh David set up the twenty four priestly branches (spawning king making material) that were each to be deemed valid natural contenders for the Jewish throne. It seems to me that without intimate understanding of David or any of the many hierarchical values that bestowed him with power, ignorance over what substantiates “royalty” from pedestrian “rank and file” will perennially reign. Usurpers naturally capitalise on this schism. Indeed, the truth would be enough to bring down their phoney baloney house of cards.  Dissenting historians irregularly report of the wisdom of the Oannes, but where is it to be found now?

Jesus is fantasy, a marketing brand that coordinates a very special historic period. He was the event which preceded Philistine formal grasp of absolute power. Therefore, modern traditions that prepare a muted, ineffective “Saviour” emphasise corporate will to control (Scrooge had absolute autonomy over directions of conscience). In other words, when the huddled masses are suitably impoverished and hope lacking, their only alternative is to turn to corporate commerce (big government) for succour. That is predominantly why the “machine” has relentlessly pushed a socialist agenda over the last hundred years or so. Now the hundred years is up, we are very close to “end game”. Australia’s prime minister is a billionaire (or so rumour has it). America’s president Trump is a tycoon. America is the first “first world” country. Australia is the last “first world” dominion. This tells anyone that understands the “code” that the oligarch’s are now brash enough to boast “we’ve won and there’s nothing [you] the people can do about it”.

I have written about the truth behind Jesus “the person” at length before, but it is worth repeating additional detail again to bring some extra clarity to this essay. Anagrammatised Josephus equates to “give birth to Jesus” in Latin tongue. It is such a clever anagram; “metaphor” is implied through use of letters P, H and O. I am also aware that “J” is obsolete so, in this case, whatever normally replaces it works just as well. One of the apocryphal books casts the young Jesus so well educated in theological matters it is presumed he was the son of a High Priest. Josephus’ father was Matthias Joseph, a High Priest of the 24th line from David (i.e. as illustrated earlier, royal blood). Militant Jesus attacking money changers at the temple was so contextually uncharacteristic, whoever it was clearly wasn’t preaching Jesus (isn’t it “odd” that Philistine Catholicism forbade money lending entirely on those grounds and this legitimised Jewish banking, coincidence?). Sermon on the Mount from Matthew’s Gospel presents a pensively angry prophet, but not a violent one. My inherent sources report that the young militant man was none other than Jesus’ (or, rather, Josephus’) father (who also used the codename Barabbas).

According to these sources, in his youth, Matthias Joseph joined the revolutionary movement and was impassioned by the royal cause against Roman tyranny. Because Arab puppet kings met most (if not all) of the Pharisees’ wishes, Zealots (as these revolutionaries became known) were doubtlessly not too fond of the extreme right-wing establishment either. This presents a problem for those determined to rationalise the truth, which is embroiled in politics that are quite complicated. To extend my observation of the young revolutionary Barabbas who attacked the money changers, he was arrested and convicted of a serious offense. Theologians that have bothered to study contemporary Roman law almost universally agree that Jesus did nothing (as visually evident in the numerous religious records) to warrant arrest, less crucifixion. Roman Philistines did impose very harsh penalties (up to death) on any party that disrupted the supply chain (commerce). Moneychangers at the temple would have provided commercial supply and they were undeniably [violently] disrupted by Barabbas (under pseudonym).

The physical crucifixion event (per its convenient placement in various New Testament writings) was used metaphorically. I shall discuss metaphorical terms shortly. For now, let me focus on the event. Some have noted that the crucifixion was conducted on private land, which was unusual. In Jesus’ case, this would imply that Barabbas was either extremely rich, well connected or both. The land, we learn, belonged to prominent local business man Joseph of Arimathea, whose international business holdings were reputedly centred at Cornwall, England (Gnostic-Druid heartland). Josephus’ scribe was Lazarus, son of Joseph of Aramithea. Jesus’ “wife” was Mary Magdalene, Lazarus’ sister, so there are logical family connections here. As Miriam (Mary) has rather negative connotations (suggesting bereavement) in ancient Hebrew, it is not widely used. Mary, on the other hand was a very popular contemporary Roman given name, particularly in royal circles, as it bestowed heritage. Given this background, I am already questioning whether there was an actual crucifixion, whether the event was purely metaphorical? Ancient chroniclers were afforded great liberty in the way they expressed themselves. Therefore knowing how to read between the lines correctly is the key to understanding hallowed texts.

Before I discuss validity of the crucifixion in more depth, I need to make a few more associated observations. Presumption Mary Magdalene was never called Miriam suggests she was prominent Roman offspring. Could this mean the Joseph of Aramithea had taken a Roman Philistine wife? Was she of royal lineage (hence selecting Mary as the given name for her daughter)? I am compelled to believe that she would have been extremely important for Joseph to be on first name terms with Pontius Pilate, Roman Governor of Judea. Turning to Inherent sources once more, I am informed that a royal marriage was brokered between Barabbas (Jesus’ father) and another Mary. If, as some scholars like to posit, Jesus was a family member of the Piso emperor class, that lineage could only have come via his mother (as his father was a Jewish royal). Should this prove sufficiently correct, it would explain why the Catholic Church gives the Madonna such bloated “eternal” status against puny “dead” Jesus on the cross. Congregations from all over the globe flock to touch her miracle working effigies.

Presuming a marriage had been brokered between “Mary” (euphemistically known as mother of Jesus) and Matthias Joseph (father of Josephus who “gave birth to” and was literal Jesus), contemporary politics would have been revolutionised (endorsing the Pharisees’ political intrigue). In conjunction, the undeniably hard to resolve question is “why did the Pharisees back clemency in favour of Barabbas (father of Jesus)?” unless there is more to solving the puzzle than meets the obvious eye.  Does this suggest that Jesus was a recalcitrant heir (hinted at in the Prodigal Son parable)? If Matthias Joseph was an integral part of the establishment, then Josephus almost certainly defied the wishes of the father. Failure of his preaching tour in the Nazareth region highlights the discontentment. Nazareth, at the time, was a hub for the well-to-do and privileged classes, so naturally political preferences erred towards hard-line right-wing philosophies. One can but presume that Matthias Joseph, as the bastion of civilised society and honoured revolutionary, had strong ties to religious order (i.e. the Pharisees). Josephus was comparatively Bohemian (again implied in the Prodigal Son parable).

Whilst alien to traditional Gnostic writings, all Gospels identify Jesus as a renegade preacher who associated with undesirables (“outcasts”). He is both against the rooted establishment (though quotes from “Law” at every opportunity) and oppressed civilisation (measuredly). Socialist content embedded in sermons would fare so well, proverbs have been adopted by modern day democracy movements. Courtesy of his royal status, Josephus did have friends in high places that shielded him, but they were still pillars of mundane society that were forced to corrupt certain values to remain in power (and use aliases when assisting renegade causes). This is perhaps casually camouflaged by Jesus’ association with outcasts (inwardly well meaning, but outwardly dishonest). Therefore modern day belief in “the Saviour” relies on corrupt zeal. Zeal, in turn, has transformed into a fanaticism cultivated by corporate religions. Individual beliefs are singular matters of faith, whereas idolatries become authorities for those that chose to apply “so called” blind faith (a grotesque form of ignorance).

Individual beliefs must be questioned to improve constancy, whereas determined authority erodes opportunity for zealous fidelity

Jesus would share Josephus’ birth year of 37AD, unless historic accuracy is obscured here. There are niggling problems with this date particularly when factoring in the most practical chronology allowing for his two and a half year ministry. The Siege of Jerusalem is the obvious choice as a correlating time period which I would say is the only plausible term of upheaval within range significant enough to profitably bolster a prophetic preacher’s missionary tour. His audience would have predominantly been Jews recoiling from ever widening Roman reprisals. Under such conditions, the siege must have been deemed the “final straw”. Adding to my case, Jesus’ journey has been retraced by geographical experts. Median chronology fits against the siege timeline like a glove, therefore I deduce the ministry ran from 64-66AD and that is why the first Gospel by Mark was published sometime after 68AD (long enough to source witnesses, conduct interviews, correlate notes, write, edit and publish a manuscript). There was no oral period as has been “supposed”, because it made no sense anyway. The contemporary Jewish connotation of what was meant by “Messiah” (then) is very different to the hybrid evolution (distortion) that prepares our modern day Catholic sacrificial Son of God “Christos” (or Christ) who “died for our sins”.

Considering proximity against the siege, details of Josephus’ geographic movements do appear to cultivate the “swashbuckler dodging authorities” narrative line. That’s why Jerusalem under siege was last stop – a fait accompli. According to Matthew’s Gospel, one of Jesus’ first acts (after collecting his posse of disciple bodyguards) was to request baptism from his cousin John (son of Zechariah). Traditionally a Jew reached maturity at age thirty, yet was the 37AD birthdate to be correct, then Josephus would have been twenty seven years old if the chronological positioning was accurate. Although the Roman equivalent was age twenty five, there is another explanation. Hebrew chroniclers did not necessarily place events in correct historic order. Prosperity very much justified the means. It seems more likely, in which case, that Jesus was baptised at the end of his ministry when he had built experience worthy of exalted blessing. Authority did not make purges against perceived threats until after the siege (identifying why there was a rapid exodus away from the region directly after 70AD). That is when John the Baptist (contender for the Jewish throne) would have lost his head. Josephus was only spared from the inquisition because of his royal Roman blood.

Mentioned earlier, Jesus was not crucified as there was nothing he did that could justify the punishment under Roman law.  His father, under the pseudonym Barabbas, may have gone through a ceremonial or mock crucifixion. Perhaps others followed suit, such as Simon of Cyrene, to honour the event. Ambiguous Turin Shroud (under care of the Catholic Church – that should instantly raise alarm bells) is a prop designated to fool believers. Beyond doubt, the item belonged to Jacques De Molay Grand Master of the Knights Templar, though only Michael Baigent has had the courage to attest truth in his mainstream publication (Holy Blood, Holy Grail 1982) for my research. Following Molay’s heresy conviction (under Catholicism), he was crucified (1314) in a manner that traced details laid out in the New Testament texts.

Metaphorically, depending on the event’s positioning, in the biblical context, the crucifixion represents the death of Gnosticism, whereas resurrection equals triumphant rebirth in the form of Christianity. The very earliest brand is likely to be Arianism. We can see the stem of Arian-ism is Arian or Aryan, so this should volunteer major questions from the alert. Didn’t Hitler worship a mythical Aryan race? In fact, of all the ancient (pre-biblical) races “Ceres” is the type that most closely represents Ayran characteristics. Significantly, Aryans are attributed to be pure Atlantis stock (alien genes were added to replenish humanity after the fall). This fits the overall picture, because traditions (including a weight of generally unrecorded information referenced from inherent sources) suggest the Gnostics went to extraordinary lengths in their attempts to rekindle Atlantis society. Some of their more sacred traditions, which included embedded magic (notably applied by practitioners of authentic Druidism and, hence, the elites’ interest in attending the mystery schools), predate known civilisation.

It could be argued that the whole concept of monachal divinity was ushered in by Atlantis. Accoutrements include the royal sceptre, which authentic versions are magic healing wands doubling as laser weapon. Bona fide royal orbs are holographic truth generators. A king’s crown bestowed the wearer with supernatural powers. Gnostics (visually expressed in the culture of Babylonian pharaohs) tried to approximate traditions as closely as possible. Below the Atlantis umbrella, society was guided by God who assumed formal presence in human form (i.e. this notion derived into “son of God”). As far as I can ascertain, Atlantis Gods were normally male, but on (or inside) other worlds, females preside over divinity. Per alien custom, these strange Goddesses are usually escorted by what we would call “prince consorts” (heirs or court champions’ suffice). Perhaps this is why some detailed truthful accounts tabled in ancient legends come across as ludicrously farcical.  We humans know only the human way. Therefore, non-human cultures are destined to either shock the system or captivate imagination.

In the interest of clarity, Gnostic-Jewish belief supposed the messianic priest-king (Christ) was the blessed divine embodiment of the people and that is why Jesus is euphemised as the Son of God. Even so many [differing and sometimes contradictory] messages can be delivered by a single fragment of text. Researchers should assure themselves a purist’s Messiah’s wisdom would put Solomon’s childish antics in their place. Ridiculous emphasis on the Pharisees’ salute to valid laws has ruined any chance of divine virtue governing man. Old Testament sermons dictate a path to enlightenment so rigid, any traveller is guaranteed crippled from the off. That is the reason paradoxes are so plentiful, “issues” seem to loom every few verses. Per these auspices, how could religious traditions be anything other than viscerally dishonest? My heart goes out to Italy’s La Befana . That bonny witch on a broomstick does more for Italian children than any pompous pope could dream.

Advertisements

Totalitarian Brands: He Who Controls the Gold “Wins”

gold-bullion

Introduction to Totalitarian Brands

corporate pardophiliaBefore embarking on my longest blog entry to date, I had originally conceived the title Totalitarian Brands, but to do justice to accrued research data would have required at least a hundred blank sheets. As this (in word format) equates to roughly 50,000 words, with every page filled, I would easily have had enough content to compile a small book should have I taken up the challenge. pope_benedict_xvi-evilIndeed, emphasis on the greatest corporate brand, paedophilia, might inspire dozens of paragraphs alone, given the lack of fortitude and basis elsewhere. However, the great journalists’ guide, if there was such a thing, would surely advise writers that readers’ attention spans are limited at best, so I feared scrutiny would be stretched beyond the max if I entertained this mountainous quest in addition to supplements covering far wider, more convoluted antagonisms. Therefore I, being of sound mind, have already part scripted “”The powers’” great accolade: Brand Pedo” for a future Ozzie Thinker entry and will say no more on the subject now.

New Israel Fund 'members'This essay will still keep the original title idea, Totalitarian Brands. “He who controls the gold wins” is the first of a number of topical segments. Accordingly, this one reflects on feudalism, royalty, coinage, currency, ownership and other things generally related. What would a political article be without terrorists? Accordingly I have scheduled an intro to my feisty fellow Arab-American crime fighter, Mantiq-Al-Tayr. That said, given this post is my longest to date (remember that bit about peoples’ attention spans) it will have to be in brief. In summary I would like to present conclusions that indisputably outline the tragic connection between ownership, money and war. Reflectively, concordant with that agenda, the whole atheist, fake science paradigm simply replaces or expands on institutionalised religious judicial mass indoctrination.

original-sin-3But, to be clear, we must start at the beginning when there were no brands and God walked with man. According to atheists “God walking with man” could not possibly be so, but I disagree. Beliefs hold so much credence they can construct reality, providing that perception is never tested. If I decide the moon is made of cheese, only visiting the heavenly object will expose the belief. fxh6dmg2-1328162484Therefore, providing I never rocket to the heavens, my belief will be held sacred. Of course, for our “all knowing” atheists the reverse is so. To honestly assert belief in the total absence of anything requires absolute knowledge of everything to back it up; otherwise erstwhile glib sentiment is no different to that of those dreamers of cheesy moons. The atheism syndrome (and that is all it is) highlights a deliberate ignorance.

It is a cult that was founded on the assumption that God is all-consuming (the trendy way of saying everywhere). When something’s everywhere, theoretically you don’t have to look very far to find it, agreed. Atheist cultYet, what these occultists fail to take into consideration is they might just be looking at things entirely in the wrong way. My book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, outlines the right way. Brand perception is essential for marketeers of totalitarian propaganda campaigns. Strict homage to materialism allows impressions to disseminate “correct thinking” towards their causes. Vagaries of wilfully dishonest and divisive interpretations of truth create the modern day dichotomy that distorts good sense into hybrid fantasy. Truth takes a back seat to totalitarian passion. Logic and reason are consumed by branded emotion to stir ignorant multitudes.

Communist, atheist material belief systems expand new commerce frontiers

Lenin-Bronstein-Gulag-HellRecently a Facebook heckler gave feedback that my articles are opinion pieces. To a degree, this is correct, but has an article ever been written that is opinion free? All journalism imbues lavish alliterations which deliberately foment ambitions geared to enhancing branded truth. Choice of words and inflections is tantamount. For arbitrary bodies’ hell bent on universal control, meanings of the words that stick in the throat can be changed over time. Nikolai Levashov, for instance, observed a number of popular Russian terms were given opposite meanings after the Communist takeover that is labelled revolution (sic). This, he outlines, was a deliberate and effective strategy geared towards shaping new opinions and a new ethos that both backed off of and contradicted old order.

native-americans-fighting-terrorism-warriors-braves-fightersWhen I talked about only God and man at the beginning, Introducing atheists was a ploy. You see atheism is all about commerce and nothing to do with divinity. With no God, legitimate “finders’ keepers” can claim “discoveries” from conquest or exploration. America was found on this principle and that is why administrative arbitrators legitimised stakes to claims. If God was to be factored at any point, free land was originally stolen [from God]. Ownership is a synthetic manmade system. It is not wide ranging or far reaching; quite the reverse. It supports that (or, more importantly, those) which is “privy to” contractual order. Therefore, as the American natives were obsolete as far as the white invaders were concerned, contracts always forfeited their moral claims until commercial stakeholders saw advantage from philosophic reversal.

FedMinFinBeninAtheism has become more than a cult. It is an accessory to the de-spiritualisation of mankind. Those destined to control are not merely content with their fake ownership contracts. They also want to manufacture nature. For instance, with no almighty God at the helm, nature is a balance confined to survival of the fittest. War, by this determination, attempts to validate the natural progression of order. Yet, in truth, all conflicts are a consequence of ownership. The most cherished of all things that are owned is an individual’s life (self). Therefore, per utopian logic, the root of all disputes (pre-empting “war”) would be anything that is deemed to undermine self-interest (or, in plainer words, selfishness). Ownership, many fail to realise, will always only be as good as the belief in the contracts that substantiate the concept. A concept is all ownership will ever be and it is that what binds legacies ratified by terms of inheritance after every life eventually fades into oblivion.

Deceptive 'truths'Belief systems are pivotal for the manufacture of assuming audiences. Without visceral pointed mob views, brands are finished, so the group is programmed to squeeze out individual innovators, pioneers and revolutionaries unless they are the new trend setters. For instance, Christian “truther” networks spare no effort in emphasising criticism demonstrating how mainstream Medias are rigged to suit the wishes of corporate peers (governments rarely amount to anything more than corporate sponsors). Yet, by the same token, the majority of articles, bulletins and paraphernalia produced by these networks are more biased, militantly partisan and truth lacking than the arenas they condemn. Even so, dirty “lies” buried in the mainstream are very deceptive indeed, so I would still judge that the greater evil of the two. Besides, alternative activism caters for beatniks whereas the other tragic resource, when in tune, wholeheartedly supports a perpetual corporate totalitarian agenda. Statistically, the mainstream supposedly fuels and is the majority (or populist) view. If this is and remains so, mankind has a world of worry ahead.

Hidden past truths might divine present and future prophecy

JP FarrellI make no effort to disguise the fact that I share Joseph P Farrell’s opinion that the banking system (or commerce) paved the way for kings and then religions to execute order. To be more precise, I believe humanity was rebuilt using this tried and tested way to progress civilisation after the collapse of Atlantis. The-Ark-of-the-CovenantReligions were “the Law” and “justice systems” combined. That is why the Pharisees (dissenters or usurpers) were both religious leaders and judges of the ancient Israelites. The reason one interpretation of the meaning of the word Pharisee is “hypocrite” was some Israelites set about to pervert all the prehistoric Atlantis values of civilisation to create the culture control monster that operates with impunity today. Be very clear on this history. It is very important. Potentially the lost Ark of the Covenant contains stone tablets detailing original Atlantis order. That is why they have never been “found. “Moses” originally hid them so his cronies could rule by rote in my opinion, unless he settled in Ireland. If that was the case, corruption would have begun any time after his death.

jesus-4Before I reveal attention to details required to unravel the fraud being painted as historic, scientific and political truth, I would like to offer an example of how reason can be divined with common sense and good calculation. Astute visitors will notice the “Profile of the Gnostic Jesus” section here. The name “Jesus” is presumed to first appear in the New Testament accounts of the Bible (and some of the contemporary Dead Sea Scrolls). Of the main canon, colloquially known as the Four Gospels, no original manuscripts have survived, so it is impossible to [precisely] determine what languages were used for the autographs. Thus, lexicons might and do argue the name Jesus is a Greek (although there is no letter “J” in that tongue and the Hebrew alphabet has a provision for all sounds creating the name) derivative from Aramaic Yeshua.

3-josephus-e13630990433631In addition, presuming Yeshua has anything to do Jesus is a preconception, mitigated only by the fact it is the closest sounding Aramaic name that might be compared to Jesus. Insomuch, arguments are clearly fuelled by the desire to satisfy a particular narrative line; i.e. in this case original texts were produced in the everyman tongue, Aramaic. That purpose is aimed at deflecting serious consideration as to the abnormality of the word Jesus and the formal contemporary religious significance of doctrines associated with the name that blossomed into the Christian Church. Predictable organic growth of an average Jewish man [into something he wasn’t] offers the avenue to explain away those theoretical divine powers as merely metaphorical or wishful thinking. If Jesus was not one of a range of names that were used prior to and over the contemporary period, why did the subsequently wide usage (particularly in Latin communities) as a given name take hold? In effect, totalitarian propagandists have etched a character from the tradition that is part of a wave of change. Jesus, the individual, whilst not being superfluous, is rendered rather impotent or misunderstood by that religious systemisation.

The Holy Blood and Holy Grail is hybrid catholic-Zionist totalitarianism

25428efdf0cda78860ad4fef0fe33bf9There is another strange, enigmatic, dare I say contemporary once more, character called Josephus, who, inexplicably, shares a potentially unique name with Jesus. The Pharisaic old guard blast on about his birth name being ordinary Joseph Ben Matityahu (Joseph son of Matthias), but this might also be poppycock and only evidence of Scarlet Pimpernel covering his tracks, given that there are no other contemporary clues or tangible documents beyond the written legacy of Josephus about his own life. The additional claim that he adopted Flavius (Roman royal) in homage to the Emperor, in spite of his father’s proto-kingly status as a high priest of the bloodline of David, no less, is so preposterous it’s almost laughable. The only decent response to that is, pull the other one Zionists, it’s got bells on.

Is this JesusIt seems to me that Josephus represented the creation of a fusion of two royal orders (each characterised by his given and surname) and the reason the (presumed) medieval additions to the main biblical canon talk of Joseph as the father of Jesus is they more pertinently give clues as to Josephus’ father’s status/history. Jesus’ attack on the money changers outside the temple (which might not have existed) was so out of place, it was contextually clearly presenting a different person. Given the textual symmetry and character of minor agitator, Barabbas, he is an ideal candidate for the unrest, arrest, imprisonment and crucifixion. He must have been spared actual crucifixion, either because passer by Simon Cyrene acted instantia, Joseph of Arimthea negotiated with Pontius Pilate or both, in order to sire Jesus. Biblical accounts of the crucifixion/resurrection take history out of context in order to offer different political metaphors on Gnostic/Pharisaic control of rule of law. Barabbas’ (Justus) common name was Joseph.

GiveUsBarabbasIn addition, though this may be too great a stretch of the imagination for some, filius is Latin for “son”, so could its abbreviation to “us” have been added to Joseph as the new, hybridised name Josephus with view to inflect “son of Joseph”? I think filius to ph-us in anagrammatic form is a plausible mind stretch. For instance, in prior articles I noted the incomplete Latin anagram “pho(r) Jesus” from letters of Joseph, which means to bear forth Jesus. Searching references for earlier uses of Josephus as a common name, I find none. There are plenty of other clues to this enigma, but the coincidence of two similarly unique names coming from intrinsically linked characters overwhelmingly points to the buried truth that they belong to the exact same identity.

Downhill from Atlantis and a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow

Returning to contemplating the history of how the meaning of civilisation has been distorted to purposefully enslave the masses, it was a minority of Israelites that masterminded a new order championing commercial privilege to the detriment of humanitarian values. In effect, they have slowly and catastrophically systematically usurped the wisdom of Atlantis, brick by brick. They have gradually converted cosmic order into “graded” chaos. Though interest in gold (as a measure) predates Israelite fascination, according to Vedic references of much more ancient origins, cuts of silver were the preferred method of fiscal accountability perhaps stretching back prior to the Atlantis civilisations (originally on Mars!).

8Lnq4Q1It must be said, things of value were scant indeed in those eras so comparisons with modern day corporate rationalisation are impossible. Where to buy pooBelieve it or not, we live in unique times which have never been tried or tested before. Today, people even pay for manure! That’s the difference. The ownership concept has grown to become an almost universal standard and commerce wastes no opportunity to manipulate and destroy goodwill. Just about all common lands went years ago. Major restrictions are placed on “free” drinking water. Is the air to be regarded as the next great industrialist conquest for the conquistadors? They do still need slaves to toil and buy goods; else commerce would collapse in a heap. But the most current great pioneering “venture” is for power over life and death by controlling illness and the medical fix (a future instalment, “Are Vaccines a Globalist Strategy Being Used to Cull Populations?” is planned)

1381671805_16Of course, these plots neither appeared overnight nor happened by accident. There was extensive planning. Steps of the outline were simple. First off, the parasites needed to convince everyone to use money when and where it hadn’t been used before. Mainstream history records the primary, but very crude, attempt at globalisation being the preoccupation of the Greeks (or presumed Greeks, who were both Israelite Hyksos and the terrible Philistines, in my opinion). No real expansive, persisting commerce strategy was employed beyond loot and pillage by them. Interestingly Alexander the Great and infamous Cleopatra were, reputedly, Macedonians (perhaps even Romanians?) so the ethnic footprint of ancient times would likely confound the populist historical view anyway.

Australian HieroglyphsBe that as it may, after the Greeks failed to maintain control and their empire fizzled out, a new Roman (de facto “Greek”?) regime magically appeared to confront the world once more. This time, after the prior dry run, things were better organised (in some ways confirming there was a single adaptable blueprint for order and de facto Greek and Roman puppet masters were bound by identical philosophies). I would have included the ancient Babylonians, but evidence of global conquest is too thin on the ground. Remarkably though, Egyptian wall writings and artefacts have even been found on the Australian and American mainlands so, given time, perhaps a case could be built in favour of the Babylonians originally driving universal chaos. Maree Moore puts compelling arguments for the Israelites as breakaways from the Babylon powerhouse. Michael Tsarion goes further, I am led to believe.

Roman coins and rude Britons

religion Joshua_JerichoOf all the many innovative Roman strategies, the most illogical (without foresight) and noteworthy is the radical introduction of copper or bronze coinage. I use the term “radical” perhaps inappropriately as there is a copper talisman or coin colloquially known as the Pittsburgh Penny that has been contextually dated at around 200,000BC, so perhaps the Roman imagination was not that great after all. Ancient Israelites considered copper a precious metal as it was accounted for in the three wagon loads of plunder they had collected after “Godransacked Jericho for them. God is the ultimate totalitarian brand, but more on that later from my friend Mantiq-Al-Tayr. The Greeks, Celts or what passed for ancient Russians predominantly used silver and gold as base values. There is a significant reason for this which will be presented in due course.

33A4A5DC00000578-3565350-image-a-1_1461937419088Anyway, the Romans didn’t restrict their potentially worthless coinage to Rome. No, copper and bronze talismans were exported in industrial quantities and often buried for locals to find in order to entice other fledgling nations into the commerce trap. History has shown the Celts knew better as modern day treasure seekers are still digging up the Roman refuse. Indeed, the only way they could entice British chieftains to take a mild interest in compliance was by salting each trove with silver or gold. Given the Druids administered a system of pantheism which elevated the harvest festival, these were blissful times of peace and humanity, only interrupted by occasional silly squabbles between ill-disciplined cultural leaders.

Druids-mistletoeAfter their disastrous British campaign, the Romans determined the Brits made lousy hosts, business partners and slaves. Besides, staying would have risked destroying the jewel of exalted heritage (that which separated the aristocrats from plebeians). Just about all the great mystery schools and colleges (some say over 100) were located in what has now become England’s mainland, Glastonbury, Avalon included. Learning was courtesy of breakaway Israelites; the Druids. 050113084221E0Is it any wonder those original teachings have been “lost” too? Global elites still flock to prestigious public schools Eton and Harrow, the great universities at Oxford and Cambridge or the London School of Economics.

Her status as the seat of learning is an essential clue demonstrating Britain was or became the mythical Promised Land. In this capacity she has been used as a yard stick for globalist totalitarian policy ambition. Not only that, researchers can see which initiatives have stuck, i.e. Middle Ages feudalism wasn’t an accident of the times. It was a massive step forward and feather in the cap of the global control agenda. Consequentially, other countries have gone further. For instance, the Buddhists imposed ridiculously savage measures on the people of Tibet to uphold totalitarian ideals, lest those that see safety in religious dogma forget. Praise God the atheist Chinese intervened! As expressed earlier, the ultimate plan for globalisation was drafted in Atlantis times (over 10,000 years ago) and corrupted into an unmoving agenda that relentlessly rolls on.

Conquest, currency and control

651235Celtic coins in circulation prior to Roman occupation of Britain were all called Staters and, I presume, this was because those tokens were only issued to instruments of State (chieftains and so on). Instead, the Romans had gold “pounds” or libres (freedom) for the ruling classes. Silver “shilling” solodi (denoting intelligence) were for the merchant aristocrats. Plebeians had to be satisfied with copper/bronze pennies or denarii (meaning a farmer’s dowry or ten asses). Hadrian Denarius_lgThough those who study coinage of the extended Roman periods may disagree with my gross over-simplification, order was basically punctuated through coinage. This is not about metal scarcity, although lack of metal stock did negate the mint (which means “silver”) of occasional gold solodi and silver denarii.

Roman coinage encapsulated ideals. Doubtlessly, other attributes can be found in the analysis of the argenteus, nummus, laureate, miliarense and so on. The point is that there were/are far rarer metals that could have been used to augment value if rarity was the objective. NPG 708; Queen Victoria by Lady Julia Abercromby, after Heinrich von AngeliNot only did the British system pretty much adopt simplified Roman currency measures up to modern day pre-decimalisation, but gold has always outstripped silver value too. It is duly noted industrialists periodically play act to create the illusion markets are spontaneous, but never once has silver come even close to overtaking gold value.

tsar-nicholas-ii-russiaFurther evidence supporting Britain as the Promised Land and the next step after Roman tyranny is Queen Victoria’s empire. Her conquests were so wide ranging they expanded beyond the Greek and Roman globalisation campaigns to conquer one quarter of the globe. Factoring incestuous royal connections, the entire Earth was largely property of the elites by World War One. Even arctic regions and other hard to get to places were grabbed as a consequence of (or, perhaps, part of the reason for) World War Two. Though a theoretical World War Three began in 1984 it has been concerning who controls political commercial rights designated for eventual administration by a United Nations/NATO global federalism cooperative. The formal end of sovereign royalty was symbolised by the murder of Russian Tsar Nicholas II 17th July 1918. Compelling data suggests the Romanov dynasty was installed by the Rothschilds 1775 (a year before American Independence) and removed by the same basic stakeholders.

benjamin-netanyahu-pope-francisWhen World War Three is “won”, “Law making” will still be outsourced to Israel, of course, unless that centre is moved for security reasons. Other nations’ boundaries won’t noticeably change, unless puppet leaderships prove impossible to manage. Currently commerce favours large bodies of people to be broken up. Weaken the national voice enough then trouble makers are easier to silence seems to be the reasoning. Besides, the CIA, NSA and other noteworthy propaganda agencies have armies of internet dissenters poised to drown out any sincere pleas for help. Given the latest American mass shootings (if “real”), I should mention the FBI manipulates “vice” (per Puritan/Pharisaic ideals). Historically, it is also worth adding, Roman Order became Catholicism and, via United Nations hybrid New Age philology, the Pope is now the most influential individual man on the planet. Sure, the Buddhists have tried to muscle in with their Dalai Lama, but is he not doing the New Age pas de pas too? NATO is a branch of the Pentagon which is what became of the feared but most prized consortium of merchants; the East India Company.

Back to trading basics

probably PURE fantasyReturning to my history of how coinage symbolises control of the masses, the Romans failed to influence the lowly Brit. Their stinking peasants’ coins did not change the mindset of the masses and these quickly became obsolete in favour of barter. Territories that unified to become Germany in 1870 were partially a Roman success, though. Mass populations of influential States were broken from the 8th century onwards under the yoke of copper money. Sheepish bulldogHistorically, the Brits have always refused to become an annex of Europe, so attitude outcomes are hardly a surprise. Nevertheless, post decimalisation woes have paved the way for all sorts of horrors, such as membership of the Common Market, European Union and introducing the dreaded Euro alongside coin of the realm. It is sadly looking as though the great British bulldog has been crossbred with the poodle.

amiens-cathedral-the-central-portal-colored-lighting-1When William Conqueror attempted to impose the will of the elites on the English people, he achieved next to nothing (other than commissioning construction of those towering cathedrals designed to swamp faith). Feudalism could only be engineered with silver; coinage of the aristocracy (thinking classes). Craftsmen and serf alike insisted on pay. In fact, unsurprisingly, the introduction of copper coinage only returned with Charles II’s milled coins for Britain and Ireland from 1660. The rightful king had been invited back to lead an unconstitutional British monarchy after the elites’ hallowed republic dismally failed. Nepotism had dealt a final indignant blow to their enchanted “Commonwealth” (or Protectorate) run by Oliver Cromwell. He had bestowed greater powers on his son than deposed king Charles I had wielded. Charles, of course, had been murdered to usher in a new age of light (which, I must say, equated to excruciating darkness for the masses) clearly of the “deepest black” variety.

2012AA42119Globalised banking (heralding modern day standardisation) reputedly began with an agreement established by Lloyd’s Agencies at a London coffee (brought in by the New World) house in 1694, although a little more detail on the politics of the time might make things clearer. oThe plan had always been to unite the British Isles under the “Union of Jacob”. However, both Scotland and Ireland had shown to be uncontrollably troublesome. From the Middle Ages conquest against the Scots was common with memorable battles such as Bannockburn of the second war over independence. The way England and Scotland were eventually permanently joined was via shared kingship. Elizabeth I left no legitimate heir so this allowed James VI of Scotland to become James I of England. Perhaps Mary, Queen of Scots, was executed in vain?

2CivilWar-StGilesHe began costly wars against Ireland with some earnest. James’ son, the deposed Charles I, did less, possibly because affairs of state were abruptly interrupted with the civil war of 1642, but unrest in Scotland and Ireland (viewed as a “protectorate”) from 1639 onwards is colloquially known as the Bishops’ Wars. The hapless king was famously executed in 1649 after losing the civil war and his son was forced into exile. However, in 1651 the Scots crowned Charles II king. With it came an attempt at reinstating Charles with the English throne too. However, this was foiled by roundhead generals in control. Britain, theoretically, was subject to Martial Law from 1649 until Cromwell was sworn in as Protector December 1653. The point I am trying to make is that the 1600’s was a period of enormous upheaval and political turbulence, so it is no wonder the bankers felt confident enough to conspire in 1694.  It is inconceivable that they weren’t linked in some way with the consortiums of merchants that had rebelled against royal authority.

Flemish influence, the Bill of Rights and more tyranny

dec_of_rightsTwo years later William of Orange would be in control of Britain through marriage with Mary Stuart. Mary was the daughter of James II (son of Charles II) who had been deposed and exiled by nobles (merchant bankers) for exerting too much royal power. Notably, King William introduced the Bill of Rights for British aristocrats (which to some degree addressed the failings of the Cromwell republics) along with the Dutch mortgage systems. If the royals were now hypothetically bankrupt, it wouldn’t take too long for the aristocracy to follow with the helping bankers’ hands. 1696 was the year currency was first pinned to the gold standard (a weights & measures system invented by Sir Isaac Newton). AIPAC-Conf-620x350Contextually this is very important as, when England’s gold currency collapsed in 1797 (roughly a century after the gold standard was introduced) due to over speculation in the colonies, a short lived silver standard returned using royal stamped Spanish doubloons. It is breathtaking to consider the fact it took merchant bankers a mere century to break currency.

Globalists regularly cite the various Bills of Rights and Constitutions as tenets of democracy. Yet, the reality is that the philology behind Law making has skewed just about all goodwill from the outset. catchment-sensitive-farming-common-land-from-nature-england-13-638Rhetoric framing “rights” is always far too broad to scope models that work – in the universal sense. Indeed it could be said that the supposed frameworks of democracy are the very instruments of manipulation that evoke tyranny by the backdoor. Thus, special “minority” lobbies (such as AIPAC – a critical favourite of Mantiq-Al-Tayr, but there is always some special love for “hero” Jonathan Pollard too) ensure the masses are perennially subject to their wishes or, perhaps, “subjugated” might be a more apt expression. Great Britain, for instance, has no constitution and relies on a centuries old corporate charter that legitimised royal plunder of free lands. This devils’ contract is called the Magna Carta.

mwashingtonPer its 14th Amendment, the American constitution was similarly reduced to a corporate charter in 1868. Limits were possibly first tested by the District of Colombia’s “organic” Act 1871 (February 21) which set “Washington” (where all laws are made) adrift from the rest of America. BA_titleThe prior civil war (1861-65) had been a watered down version of the centuries’ earlier English one. In this case, though, the contest was between principles defining a constitutional republic and an unconstitutional commercial contract (the friendly way of saying dictatorship). From 1868 America became holus bolus property of the industrialists and is still their dictatorship. The implementation of the Federal Reserve 1913/14 was a system that expanded the “cause” to the rest of the globe. World War One was a celebration of multi-lateral control of the masses.

Gold, silver and bronze reduced to paper

tyburnWorthless copper/bronze became the universal peasants’ coinage from the 1600’s.  Coin of the realm should be taken very seriously. In my formative years, I was lucky to live in a Jacobean farmhouse. Ceilings were lined with 1850’s and 60’s newspaper sheets. Rescuing a few, I found them enthralling reading. These really were harsh times, with burgeoning inquisitions and no rescue for offenders. One young London lass had been sentenced to hang for whitewashing a farthing (one quarter penny) in an attempt to pass it off as a tanner (six pence) to a land owner. She had dared convert something worthless into a thing of value, but, most importantly, she had gone beyond her station. A popular phrase amongst the philanthropic gentry of time was “know your place” (implying their tyranny demonstrated Godly virtue). Mid 1800’s saw an industrialists’ heyday and enormous conflicts with guilds supporting craft industries. Therefore, it is important that the masses never forsake the sacrifices their forefathers made to improve the lot of those destined to have no future.

The-disputed-gold-trial-plaBe this as it may, prior to 1918 royal stamped coinage did correctly observe weights and measures (and then incorrectly up to 1945-48). I think I also need to add, at this juncture, Newton’s gold standard discussed earlier was more of a formalisation of something that went back to the dawn of creation of money, perhaps pre Atlantis times. 012_001As a precaution against fraud, it is difficult to ascertain whether crooks that clipped coins from medieval times onwards were successful in their enterprise or defaced coins were commonly rejected on sight forcing some sort of common law arrests. Theoretically, at least, any attack on the coin of the realm was a form of treason. For drastic evidence, I might select the case of a Mauritian head postmaster who was jailed with his wife in the 1850’s for using her facial profile in place of Queen Victoria’s on postage stamps. Mind you, the evidence in question was so crudely produced, I cannot fathom how anyone could tell the difference as none of the correct portrayals even vaguely resembled the queen. The point being is it was the thought of it that irked the system and that was enough to vilify outrage. Everything Queen Victoria endorsed was associated with commerce of privilege.  That giant marketing organ could not afford to see the royals’ status tarnished in any way.

Precious-Metals-ETFs_8695696282_61670a55c6_o_780x390px_85pctRight up to Word War One currency determined values backed by metals of worth. Whether the denominations were Chinese taels, French francs, Portuguese reals or common old United States of America dollars, all were representative of precious portions determined by mass. A British gold sovereign did not vary. Statue_Of_Liberty_04Nor did the guinea piece. They were what they were. Aside from the strange and untrue Washington Post announcement that 6 million Jews had been killed as a consequence of the world war, in 1919 something tragic happened. The monumental domino effect from the collapse of Germany has largely been overlooked by popular history, but if there were charges to be levelled at a New World conspiracy to usurp order, Woodrow Wilson’s draconian and unnecessary measures supplanted after the Treaty of Versailles as reparations against the fallen nation was evidence enough. Is that what is meant by New World Order?

hire-purchase-leasing-1-638Many level imprudent charges against the Federal Reserve for skimming 3% off the top of the US Exchequer. In fact, as far as I can ascertain, the bankers bear all costs associated with design, printing, distribution and stock security, so 3% (as a simple charge) seems more than fair to me. The real issue is, as usual, camouflaged by ignorance. When the cartel of bankers most foul was established, courtesy (in part) of Woodrow Wilson 1913/14, the corporate exchequer had been outsourced to money launderers. Wagon loads of German gold via France came into the United States under the approving eye of that imposing French Statue of Liberty. No wonder the 1920’s were roaring. It gave the banking industry in general, the confidence to speculate like it had never done before. Hire purchase was the active response, providing ample opportunity to bankrupt the masses.

GER-129-Reichsbanknote-1_Trillion_Mark_(1923)Germany was probably bust in 1919 but it took only two years for all the gold prised from the people to impact the Deutsche mark. Ultimately, there was no gold to back paper currency (papiermark had replaced goldmark in 1914 courtesy of the Federal Reserve) so the inevitable happened. 5-mark-1917.b.r.fHyperinflation kicked in to eventually break the Deutsche mark. In 1924 a new Reich mark was issued, but those with gold converted savings over the inflation period were ruined without hope of compensation courtesy of the prior reparations scam that had clearly been egged on by Federal Reserve bankers as they were the ones that gained so much from German misery. Since 1920, when the Federal Reserve bankers had the gall to staunchly defend the gold standard (so targeted nations would collapse without their intervention), dozens of currencies have been forced to intermittently drop off it (with “certification” from the Federal Reserve, of course). Nevertheless, Germany is probably the best example of that objective tyranny, though. Even the British pound was not spared. The 1920’s and 1930’s saw markets intermittently trading worthless banknotes. Arguments inferring that paper money was more flexible and easier to carry are flawed. The real reason paper was used is in deference to the gold standard. Earliest banknotes were no different to today’s cheques.

Jiggery pokery post German reparations lionized US-Jewish supremacy launching “commie bastard” Hitler

EvictbonusarmyThough, officially, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took America off the gold standard 5th June 1933, signs of unaccountability were clearly there in 1932 and perhaps, even, 1931. Casualties this time were First World War veterans who had had their pensions’ squandered, courtesy of “the boom” and consequential “depression”. A 1932 veterans “tent city” Washington protest march was met with callous insensitivity by the government who ended up sending in the National Guard led by gallant MacArthur; an altercation infamously remembered as the “Bonus Army” War.  The US bust leading to these unfortunate circumstances had been engineered, once again, by those hallowed Federal Reserve money launderers. Sneakily, in the late 1920’s they had syphoned huge gold deposits from America (accountably $840 million) back to Germany in preparation for a newly energised campaign launching Chancellor Hitler, January 1933.

Haavara-Agreement-Hitler-1933Barely a month after Roosevelt admonished the gold standard; Hitler had signed the Haavara agreement (25th August) with (though better known today) a mysterious order called Zionists. It was after agreed Jewish repatriation (or home moving as Haavara would suggest) to Palestine that anti-Semitism myths began to appear with unrequited vigour. Prior veiled allegations were the Zionists’ spineless way of making threats. HitlerZionist2In fact, Hitler was a mere pawn in their grand game. Once they had repatriation in place, they only needed to encourage Jews that had no intention of leaving their homeland, Germany wasn’t safe. In other words “Diasporas” that would not leave were to be pushed out. The ones that hung on to the bitter end were rewarded with maltreatment or death in concentration camps.

Very little has been written about Hitler’s Marxist-Socialist ambitions. Not only did he nationalise major German corporations, but he also stole great tranches of land from the German aristocracy (including some Jews). The Goyim, however, were not given blessed Jewish passage. Many years ago, my old work colleagues’ father informed me that after land seizure, the Von Grundherr family had emigrated from Germany to Britain with anything and everything they could carry. Their vast Bavarian estates were gone forever. See how the totalitarians omit history to craft false impressions? In fact Goebbels’ “brownshirts” were scathingly labelled Brown Bolsheviks by propagandists after World War Two and undeniably leftist, Hitler, is noted for his admiration of Stalin prior to the breakdown of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939).

6a00d83451586c69e20162fc3846f3970d-800wi1914 saw the rapid reintroduction of passport control in the European region, so clearly and demonstrably “people management” was calculated well in advance of the precursor to the modern enslavement of humanity. lec02_5Few have taken the time to learn that the passport system was abolished in France in 1861 due to a massive influx of tourists that overwhelmed immigration to such a degree it could not cope. Overall, though, the net tightened on global border security from 1947, which is odd, considering the Jew’s lament so about how Hitler used their identification papers against them. Only one year later reformed Israel became reality and the Bretton Woods System effectively universally forfeited the gold standard (only to be introduced as United States policy by Nixon in 1971, which ties in with the unspoken “5 Year Plan” that saw formulation of the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and the end of the Vietnam war in 1975). Other than a brief hiccup in Australia, with the introduction of sterling silver 50 cent coins (rounds) in 1966, global coinage reverted to copper/nickel amalgams. Gold and silver was absent never to return?

He who controls the gold wins: return to Israel by ass

MTIwNjA4NjMzMjIxNzExMzcyForget the Jewish proverb, “he that has the gold wins” as it is the controllers of the gold that are always in the box seat. Control of gold was used to create the two great wars and the Russian “revolution” (or, to be pertinent, Zionist coup-d’état). Mainstream history would never report real popular revolutions because that would distort totalitarian branding objectives. All “uprisings” are elite sponsored successes, invariably with outcomes recorded in a less than historically perfect way. As Napoleon once said, “History is a set of lies agreed upon and written by the winners”. Fortunately there have been enough unfunded and ostracised true historians to provide adequate fleeting glimpses of legitimate information to break the mould for those with persistence of learning. Agreed, intense investigation is more time consuming, requires greater diligence and discernment, but also makes the discovery tour a blissful treasure rewarding journey. I swear by it!

Futures-and-Options-differencesIt was after 1975 that the new concept, futures & options, blossomed to take markets by storm, elevating consumerism to unthinkably heady heights. To which end, the United States of America is now theoretically in debt to the tune of over $200 trillion. Whom this debt is payable to is a question everyone should demand answered, for, according to my calculations, every single “nation” on Earth is more or less in the same boat as the USA. If “balance of deficits” is not some sick joke, this is a sham of most devastating proportions; a sham that affects every human being belonging to a system that isn’t in power. We now have the situation where tax payers’ money is worthless and nations that issue it don’t have any actual capital to back promises even if they wanted to. Pledges supposedly in support of the people invariably aren’t. In fact, genuine ones are so infrequent; it must be said, in some ways policy makers give the industrialists’ enslavement of the masses agenda relative transparency.

BRICS_heads_of_state_and_government_hold_hands_ahead_of_the_2014_G-20_summit_in_Brisbane,_Australia_(Agencia_Brasil)The reason Nixon backed off the gold standard was simple. Capitalism had won by 1971 as that marked the year the merchant bankers owned the world. There is a path out of the mess that is being gently crafted by BRICS nations (acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), but I smell a double cross as far as the people are concerned. Real revolt is the only way to turn the industrialists’ clock back. Revolt can be peaceful, violent or a combination, but it must be put into motion for real change. Descendants should be ever vigilant for lasting remedies. For an example of genuine reactionary politics in favour of the people, one only needs to inspect shenanigans in Italy. Forget the Iceland nonsense. Italy is an unrivalled corporate nation in so much as the people haven’t completely lost their way and become detached from the political negotiation table. Other populations need to arbitrate Latin style and liberty might just reclaim some territory.

Free thoughts about corporate Catholicism, Zionism, P G Wodehouse and George Orwell’s “totalitarian Israel” pun

tumblr_mpn2iurpUn1rrmi6so1_500There are so many other things I wanted to talk about in conjunction with this, but, as I have already exceeded 6,000 words, it is going to take more than one sitting to do justice to the subject matter. Future articles will expand on the baseline “Totalitarian Brands”, as mentioned in the introduction. Building credentials of “yes men” to drive fake science is one item to be covered at length, though I do give hints in an earlier entry (Is Science Illusionary). Perhaps hilarious P G Wodehouse’s character, Sir Roderick Glossop, will be selected to emphasise how much philosophy in deference to data helps to validate quack science opinion. For the ill-informed, Glossop runs an experimental psychiatry clinic with founding principles intimating that by allowing sheer immoderation of consumption is enough to break any habit or addiction. Early in the narrative line our fearless sanatorium owner is quick to admit none of his patients had ever shown any cessation of immoderation, but, neither had they relapsed [from this “extremely popular” treatment]. By that token, his system was “theoretically impeccable”.

confused-man-md1The difference between consultants and slaves also deserves detailed separate discussion. Rogue branding campaigns, particularly the ones that appear misunderstood or perhaps even championed by confused free thinkers, will be tackled tactfully. In recent times, much emphasis has been placed on so-called chemtrails as the root of all modern sickness. diesel_damaged_lungsThis simply is not true as, more seriously, they are being used as a smokescreen to cover blatantly obvious petrochemical pollution; pollution I might add that likely causes all cancers, many viruses and other nagging health concerns. The anti-renaissance flat Earth movement has returned, welcomed by the Catholic Church no doubt. f26fb9d56304e7ce05239f5884f228faThough in many ways Catholicism is the balance of power against Zionism, it issues its own version of rabid propaganda which, in that capacity, can deeply impede those paths to enlightenment for unstable truth seekers that teeter on the brink of bewilderment. These hapless, well-meaning souls are regularly lured into a kind of corrupt solace from the power of “faction groups”.

history-israel-palestine-borders-timelinePretty much from 1948 the globe was treated as a fortress with stringent passport control implemented where infrastructures existed, the Bretton-Woods scheme replaced gold, deregulating paper currency (assuring all foreign exchange traded through the non-existent greenback standard) in the same year and silver was mysteriously removed from coins (as a global control measure). There surely must be much more to the conspiracy involving the reformation of Israel also in 1948. Why are there such extraordinarily high percentages of Jewish bank directors, political stakeholders and mass media owners today? In my notes pre-empting this project, I lightly scribbled “Federal Reserve New Age con”. For the life of me, I cannot remember what I meant by that unless I was referring to the role the United Nations plays in loosely scoping concepts found in Aldous Huxley’s “A Brave New World”. That said I’m sure it was important, so when I remember I’ll certainly cover it too.

Wrapping up with me, Martin Luther, Napoleon Bonaparte and Mantiq-Al-Tayr

hb_63.210.11_av2Before I sign off, I promised an introduction to the fine work and vigilance of Mantiq-Al-Tayr. uss-liberty-newThough his articles unashamedly favour the Arabian cosmopolitan view on life, the world and everything, he also patriotically champions America in the honourable sense of that word. Thus, many criticisms would be of universal appeal to those seeking more honest perspectives on life, the world and everything. Not just because he perceives his deadliest enemies as agents of Zionism, but there is also comedy, passionate language and even the occasional vagrant belly dancer to tantalise prying eyes. To be brutally frank, unless you are in the Jewish club, everyone’s most deadly enemies are agents of Zionism even if they (Zionists incognito) call themselves something else. Reformist Jesuit (had the spirit of Catholicism become so decayed by 1517 it had ceased to be viable?), Martin Luther, had much to say about the Jews.

quote-jews-and-papists-are-ungodly-wretches-they-are-two-stockings-made-of-one-piece-of-cloth-martin-luther-383331Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weissensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.” (One of Martin Luther’s pleasanter quotes against Zionism, circa 1500’s)

5965c5e18bb0160856939824a047c9c7Napoleon Bonaparte’s wisdom “You don’t reason with intellectuals. You shoot them” may seem rather inexcusable. Nevertheless, the science-atheist-Zionist allegiance is not to be reasoned with because desired truths can be reconstructed from any approximate fantasy simply through misdirection, perhaps in the way lawyers deliberately misinterpret contracts. Let us say someone symbolised a conductor’s reasonable request for passengers to alight from a train as the catastrophic command; leave the train on fire. That would parry with some misdirection stunts pulled over the years in the interests of zeal. This particular blog never will be a Jew bashing forum. I recommend investigation into the Israelite prodigal musician Daniel Barenboim’s eloquent efforts championing the Palestinians’ plight. There are many other erstwhile unknown Jewish heroes of virtue for those committed to digging deep.

southernisraelite_1445071338_58Mantiq-Al-Tayr goes out of his way to highlight psy-op misdirection, but he also observes more mundane “in your facesystem abuses that seem to go unchecked by authorities. For instance he will not let the world forget Israel’s heinous and unpunished attack on sovereign America June 8th, 1967. This unforgettable event was, of course, the foul and merciless torpedoing of USS Liberty. I won’t add to Mantiq’s thunder other than remarking he has ripped the veil covering the Whitehouse asunder. Please visit his website and pass on your thoughts. You might also wish to review posting archives which stretch back the best part of a decade or, perhaps, prior. He presents the brand Zion “God” so well. Diligent researchers will find it most interesting and disheartening at the same time that there has been virtually no change in Whitehouse administrative attitudes from bonehead Bush to that current black Messiah.

Abolition_of_Slavery_The_Glorious_1st_of_August_1838We have covered belligerent order first delivered by renegade priest-kings and then atheist commerce tsars, introduction of money where none had been present, currency regulation via arbitrary standards and covert controlled fiscal deregulation. There are a couple of other pieces of the puzzle needed to complete this sorry picture. Abolishment of slavery in England, 1807, did nothing to improve the lot for Irish immigrants now forced to work as “servants” for a pittance. Timing was calculated for the burgeoning industrial revolution. Improvements in manufacturing technologies had begun to impact the crafts’ industry back in the 18th century. Purists might question the “point” of more than one currency unit fulfilling the needs of a federalised Earth. The pertinence of multiple currencies, as far as the industrialists are concerned, was shown from cotton stock record profits made directly after slavery ending in the United States. In the spirit of déjà vu, 1865 saw the Negroes offered the same raw deal the Irish received before. It was all about stock values, excise tax and insurance. I will leave you switched on researchers to join the dots for now.

20140911_isisThus, the reason he who controls the gold wins, is it is how markets are driven that directs how populations will react [to synthetic conditions]. So if you want refugees, war and chaos, as an industrialist master, you merely need to influence markets with your gold because, though standards have been abolished, baseline value has always been inevitably measured against that filthy precious commodity. ztz1Right to export and price of imports can make or break nations. Particularly since 1971 another reckless asset has made and broken fortunes. Remembering that chemtrail smokescreen, oil is sometimes called black gold and has worked with its yellow metal partner in a pincer movement to ensnare markets of modern times. Petrodollars (invented in 1973) hidden in sovereign wealth funds (laundered by investment banks) has camouflaged incomprehensible universal funding by Saudi Arabia in particular. Super-rich Saudis are colloquially known as Wahhabis (die hard Zionists, surprise, surprise) by the way. Included in their fold are such personable families as the Bin Ladens. To coin the popular phrase, “has the penny dropped, yet?