It is rumoured there are a mere seven thousand individuals that control humanity. If the 480,000,000 optimum Earth population levels channelled by the Swiss Billy Meier cult from the Pleiadians is correct and the claim is valid, seven thousand is hardly a mystical number. However, if the Earth’s population is truly hovering around seven billions, then seven thousand would give one supreme controller per million. Knowing the logic of the matrix, that makes absolute sense. I have no concrete knowledge or evidence as to the hierarchical structure of the seven thousand, but using assimilated logic, I decipher a structure with two at the very top, five subordinates overseeing ten centurions each with battalions of a hundred fearsome leaders. Two heads are always better than one and there never would be one overall power. Besides we gravitate between positive and negative, which is sometimes mistakenly labelled good and evil. Men and women are of equal status even if one is deemed second class at any given time. Each contributes different essential elements to the whole.
I attended another local meeting yesterday and we discussed, in part, the state of order and government so this post is topical even though the draft began 15th February. So much emphasis is placed on what is current, but the same old questions and answers are being rehashed in the expectation of an ever more gullible general public. Whether they like it or not, the two individuals at the top are also subject to the rules of general public order, which is very different to holographic order proscribed by the “justice system”. For instance, if one of the two at the top so grievously offends any wrong member of the general public, no matter how lowly, his or her status does not trump or shield the potential of violent murder. The seven thousand fearsome leaders are made of flesh and blood and can perish in the same circumstances as the rest. Credentials are holographic. Remove the intrigue and they evaporate. As a concert trained pianist should I wave my credentials or play(here, here, here and here)? When a scientist with five doctorates issues a statement that would embarrass drivel, should the general public challenge it or be entranced?
At the local meeting yesterday we discussed my attempt to construct a new model social order. The difficulties in presenting a feasible solution are numerous and subtle. Should nature be included, for instance? Though I am not compelled to believe Lance Hart understood the Cetians when he wrote his book “Roll The Bones, Spin The Wheel” expressing a new government system he calls Wheelism, he touched on something very important. Lance was coming from a dark place of personal tragedy where he had his life ripped from him and that muddies the message. The message is a universal one. Wheelism caters for everything because everything makes this world, of which we are one part. A universal system must cater for everything. Bolted environmental add-ons and disclaimers after the fact are both too little and too late and do not address the universe. This is no surprise. As Lance Hart acknowledges, all systems of government are partly based on the Westminster System, which is a commerce enabler and human resource management system. Both human – or general public and universal interests are marginalised or ignored as a result. Laws are sold as majority appeal, but in reality we are press ganged into subscribing to obtuse, singular reasoning which is minority driven. Nevertheless, and this amazes me, that method of delivery works. There are many that have not considered of laws they follow, merely parroting political correctness when their integrity is challenged. Worse still, laws that should be hotly contested are either slyly broken or observed for the greater good. How can a new system of order overcome that and remain honest? This is a perplexing question and has been a giant stumbling block for me, thus far.
Governments rely on [or condition] experts for their staple arguments and holistic (sic) justification for tyranny dressed as virtue. Or is that the other way round? Either way will do. Last year I attended a presentation of a hardly known mini-celebrity in paranormal circles. Mary Rodwell was one of few I instinctively respected and, for me; the prospect of any new information was given ten out of ten even before it was delivered. Transport problems ensured I missed the first half of the presentation and, if memory serves me correctly, they let me in for free. Content was lacking; perhaps muted, but sprinkled with the Rodwell magic that sets her apart from the rest. Topics such as living spaceships (which absolutely affirm Jon Rappoport’s ongoing education that bodies are made of particles driven by a superseding life force) and life prior to “big bang” illuminated her in ways her audience could not appreciate (beyond the superficial). In addition she was consistently professional displaying the air of humble authority one would expect from a dignified master. I did pose a question she could not answer, but that is to be expected. My concern and her esteem plummeted to a minus one rating when she discussed the flaws of known scientists. Lampooning the despicable deceit of these deliberate fraudsters that had given no consideration or commentary on some of the most significant universal findings for man, she laid claim she had been privileged to receive frank and forthright information contradicting their social censorship. Compulsive liars though the distortion of information by their omissions miraculously and instinctively morph into an epiphany for Mary Rodwell? I think not. Liars are damned liars and maybe they offer a rebrand of their deceit?
At my local meeting, yesterday, one of the big discussion points was integrity and vested interests. We discussed the bible and the Qur’an. Three fundamental conclusions came from exhaustive debate. Endorsing or following a supernatural deity is meaningless. Those who unyieldingly refer to religious texts have no integrity. Only external, more unknown the better, parties may judge actions and determine intent. The one that can only do good deeds will be indiscriminately praised by the Christian, Jew, Buddhist and Muslim even with prejudice. This is important as the fundamental objective of a new order must be to encourage praise of good deeds and not criticisms of ongoing deceit and manipulation. Currently we have systems of international commerce that marginalise majorities through minority interests; financial and moral. Policy is underscored by expressions of professional liars that call themselves scientific experts. As majestic as the system and its components could have been, it has withered in the reality of humankind and our current politics. We are naturally parasitic and deceitful. The deceit begins the first time we learn to defy our parents or carers in our determination to protect our vested interests. Our scientist, politicians and industrialists are flawed because they are human beings and not in spite of the fact.
In that way my earlier criticism of Mary Rodwell was short sighted and unfair as she also battles the interests of personal status against, dare I say it, the interests of God; assuming God is the summary of goodness. Mary wants the scientists to be true and understands if they actually spoke the truth publically they would be scientists no more. Current order would ensure the removal of as much accreditation possible along with a process of international ridicule. She feels privileged that they have chosen her as a support confidant and intellectual equal. This leads nicely to the concluding statements of yesterday’s meeting. We ultimately concluded that any system boils down to egos. Therefore the danger or peril is not found in the ignorance of the masses. It is found in neurotic intellect and calculated schemes of extraordinary intelligence. Ignorance cannot twist white into black. They can only blindly follow; no matter what. The breaks have to be put on the intellectuals with much wider powers of oversight granted to critics of all backgrounds. True majesty will always stand the test of criticism, but it cannot defeat silence. Therefore credentials are the body of a Trojan horse eternally destined to deceive humanity and any hope of Godliness.