Denial and Apathy Will Restrict and Ultimately Halt Human Ascension

Internationally, I have not set the world on fire – yet! Nevertheless I am expanding my range through journalistic relationships with the Global Freedom Movement (See http://globalfreedommovement.org/), Conscious Life News (See http://consciouslifenews.com/) and other platforms.

Locally, in specific circles, I am known as the “Draco man”. For those not in the know, Draco (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/draco) is a pet name given to a group of hidden ghoulish entities that manifest as reptilians, giant bats and werewolves. Before readers entirely switch off; there has been serious consideration given to this field by respected names, such as Sol Luckman’s (See http://www.phoenixregenetics.org/books/potentiate-your-dna) dedication to the removal of malignant Jinn (plural of Genie). Indeed there is a whole movement devoted to our bodies’ electro-magnetic energy fields (See http://www.barbarabrennan.com/), sometimes called Chakras or Meridians. For those that specialise, known experts of repute cover the Draco’s manifest forms and character traits. Notably David Icke, James Bartley and even the great Simon Parkes (See http://simonparkes.wix.com/home) conjure decidedly negative imagery (See http://www.whale.to/b/bartley3.html), even when they are trying to be positive. This is where I, largely, differ (See https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/on-from-peter-maxwell-slattery/).

GeorgeCarlin

Thus I have collected plenty of wilful critics over time. The main reason I have critics is because I strip everything back to its raw essence, not humbly as a reincarnated Prophet, but rather as an agitator that creates booming, unappreciated tonal waves. Naturally the information I serve up both contradicts and conflicts with existing, sometimes long established, belief systems (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/beliefs-and-ufos/). If I had a divine purpose in life, it would be to test and expose rogue belief systems. The problem with that mission is just about all belief systems are maligned in some way, as shown in my reference link. Even the great, late black comedian George Carlin (See http://georgecarlin.com/) was not always right, but he is the one that has come closest to “raw” that I have found. To be clear, I can’t say I go out of my way to mimic George, but I find his mindset so refreshing, if he set the standards humanity might just make it. Internationally, I have not set the world on fire – yet! Locally, in specific circles, I am known as the “Draco man”. There are plenty of critics, of course, but I will explain why later.

15176711-Igloo-at-night-3D-and-hand-drawing-elements-combined--Stock-Photo

This is the problem with humanity, currently. Beginning at very early ages, people build invisible igloos around themselves and these act as impermeable filters against anything that contradicts current belief “status-quo”. Charismatic individuals or well-placed proverbs can chip away some of the igloo’s veneer, but real change will only come from extended, prolonged periods of systemic, honest inner assessment (a form of meditation). But the real problem is the perceived lack of respect of anyone outside the igloo. Everyone, without exception, that I have encountered believes they are individually special. And to be brutally frank, to be individually special, means they are better than everyone else. However, for anyone that is sincere about individual specialness, venturing outside the igloo to make direct one-on-one comparisons is the only way, on balance, to demonstrate who shines. Instead (safely ensconced in their icy cubicles), by dismissing competition, “specialness” is immortalised.

stock_photo_indexI don’t dispute some may well worship a sports star, love a great musician or become inspired by a brilliant scientist. So an Olympian can lap a pool in thirty seconds when regular folks would take ten minutes, but they only swim faster. Clearly they are better technicians than ordinary people but, by that vein, are not supernatural. The same can be said about footballers, mathematicians, doctors and so on. Social luminaries rarely challenge the threshold of individual specialness and when they do, they are never heard of again. “Challenge” is a great word (See http://theleanthinker.com/2012/08/25/the-power-of-challenge/). People feel safe around celebrities because they are not challenged by them.

Now, if someone came along who was able to turn a swimming pool’s watery contents into ice simply using thought; that would be moving into the paranormal (See http://www.pbs.org/mythsandheroes/myths_four_shangrila.html)? That would threaten the generalised “specialness” of the individual; particularly as being special is the belief system’s way of affirming a sole connection to the divine (See http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/12/15/theres-an-organ-in-your-brain-which-seats-your-soul-meet-your-pineal-gland/). In other words, no matter what anyone else thinks or does and, within reasonable limits, no matter how the individual behaves, his or her relationship with the divine will always make them special. Thus, when I come along and say I can read energy fields and can see, not guess, what you are made of and, more importantly, where you came from, audiences become very sceptical. hqdefaultThat is because scepticism is the igloo’s primary defence against ideas that attack the status-quo (See https://books.google.com.au/books?id=y6id6WOsuG4C&pg=RA1-PA64&lpg=RA1-PA64&dq=scepticism+defense+mechanism&source=bl&ots=HFcuAMI9ih&sig=MVzSdDyVZMTrh5IJakRhp44B1WU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAWoVChMIt-XZvrCOxwIVQyumCh1sfwCk#v=onepage&q=scepticism%20defense%20mechanism&f=false). The status-quo, in this case, is the unimpeached specialness of the individual. Therefore, the only ones that have shown any interest in my paranormal abilities are those that share them. To add to the intrigue, people are, with scant exception, faithless. I wonder, for instance, whether the visually blind truly believe there is colour. How could they believe in something they have never seen?

Focusing on the root of the problem, there happens to be a common set of conditions that have formed a manifesto loosely called “materialism” (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/materialism). The primo basic tenet of this philosophy is; if it can be measured (physical) it exists. Expanding (and detracting at the same time) Newton’s record, modern day materialists presume that which cannot be measured does not exist. Or, to put it another way:

“The theory or belief that nothing exists except matter and its movements and modifications”

Is this God?

Is this God?

A branch of the study called pragmatism, materialism has three distinct versions: reductionism, atheism and scepticism. Reductionism acts as the communal igloo for modern science-thinkers (is that an oxymoron?). Great powers of the like of Richard Dawkins espouse that the most effective science recording method is predicative. Therefore, just about all his work is concluded before data is collected or analysis of detail begins. His science becomes divinely inspirational as all findings that contradict the plan are either ignored or rejected and that which affirms the plan makes it stronger. Ultimately, mantras back wisdom (sic) that is beyond challenge, or so he believes.

Regularly I meet people that claim they are Jews, Catholics. Muslims and so on, but always the pragmatic (can I say “Pharisaic” [See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pharisaic]?) Religions. These people commonly shrink from “inner faith” based doctrines, such as the Kabbalah or Buddhism or Taoism, for instance. Regardless of individual claims, all are atheists. Prayer is conditional venting to a fantasy father-figure. God-Loves-Me-Just-as-I-Am-Rainbow-Pride-Heart-173x150Thus, worshipers are faithless. Their only remote connection to the divine is in the form of that specialness (I mentioned earlier) individuals cultivate from synthetic belief systems. I guess that is why there is so much scepticism in God – because belief systems that support the divine are knowingly false. Similar to predicative reductionism, dogmatic religions lay out road maps for “faith” (control) that must not be questioned by obedient followers (See https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/out-the-darkness/201412/dogmatic-and-spiritual-religion). Followers, in reality, are nothing more than slavish robots. Without faith there is no belief and these religious “subscribers” are also nothing more than atheists who “pose” via associations with political clubs. Readers must never lose sight of the fact that politics is the “affairs of people” (after the Greek). Religions that manage the affairs of the people are political orders/parties in all but name.

religion_politics_paints

Science has learnt variations in testing methods will show different data sets and, more often than not, see dissimilar conclusive results emerging. I can give my own simple example. Many years ago I engaged a pointless study occupying an idle mind. lucky-craps-dice-poker-cards-old-horseshoe-american-west-legend-antique-game-rolling-out-chance-number-seven-vintage-37741352The experiment consisted of me, two balanced white dice with black dots and a kitchen table. The first two rolls produced what craps players’ term as “snake eyes” (or “double” ones). I could have shut down the experiment there and then. Conclusions would have shown “balanced dice will always produce snake eyes when rolled on an level table”. Instead I continued, tediously, and rolled the dice a further 9,998 times. The data, surprisingly, showed that certain roll combinations were much more common or uncommon than others defying (materialist) statistical probability.

Was that reflective of me and my technique? The sceptic, whose fanatical belief in the correctness of empirical probability tables, might request a sample of 100,000 rolls to offset the error. If anomalies were consistent (or, in greater likelihood, “changed”), then the sample might be extended to a million rolls and so on until desired probability outcomes were demonstrated. My point is sceptics are merely determined to be right and will use whatever means that sanctify ambitions of correctness. If the dice sample required only thirty six rolls to map a perfect probability curve, the illusion is complete. Pressing on with another million spins might defeat sanctified propaganda dressed as evidence. Therefore, a classic sceptic ploy of these wilful deceivers is not to continually review “deemed proven” data. How can mankind possibly ascend if truth is perpetually rigged to further the ambitions of the chosen few?

59091254

Returning to my enigmatic title “Draco man” (See http://exopolitician.wordpress.com), I have been known to prompt educated criticisms of the ilk of “What an earth is this twit talking about?” from time to time. “Name calling” is a typical defamation tactic used by those determined augment “order”. Sadly the same sorry “Pharisaic aligned” crews are the offenders – reductionists, atheists and sceptics. In fairness to them, and let’s make no bones about it, the Draco technically don’t exist. So, in truth, on one level there is nothing to talk about because we are moving into energetic domains (those electro-magnetic fields I touched on earlier). Certainly from the science-reductionist authority, it would be hard to explain the Draco effectively. However, as this “ties in” with man’s ascension, I cannot avoid it. Indeed, the event or stage process is referring to an energetic shift of man which is so significant it may even impact our atomic structure.

Materialism might be a modern day concept, but overriding philosophies stretch back to the dawn of time and it can be seen in some of the earliest surviving evidence of critical thinking (See http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/a-brief-history-of-the-idea-of-critical-thinking/408). Without acknowledgement of the extra-dimensional, it is impossible to discuss the Draco professionally. aristotleSuffice to say, mostly (perhaps with the exception of “echoes of Plato”) the Greek greats did not discuss things that go bump in the night (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Things_That_Go_Bump_in_the_Night). Aristotle’s plan for the universe (See http://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/senior/cosmicengine/classicalastronomy.html), perhaps unfairly interpreted, ensured that a flat, cuboid hollow Earth was at the centre of everything and powered by the sun. Incendiary stars were nothing other than twinkling (crystalline) “prisms”. The moon, according to Aristotle, was evidence of the divide which marked the boundary for celestial domains of heavenly refuge. How long, be it adapted many times, was that blueprint for existence current? 2000 years? How would he have reacted to the Draco “concept”? Ironically, as I explain in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (Look it up on Amazon or make a donation at https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/about – and sceptics, please, please don’t buy it as the text will only give you a “beliefs embolism”), in some ways, bizarrely, Aristotle’s most unlikely opinions (given modern science-propaganda) were correct.

Whilst on the subject of my books, as a prolific writer, there are going to be a number of volumes. Number two of the series is provisionally titled, “A New World Order”. This is in the throes of completion, but the following one, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity” will discuss human origins in relation to the Draco and Annunaki’s hierarchical management of our genetics. And this is very pertinent to discussions regarding our ascension as any [genetic] change will be directly reflective of the mechanisms that activate or deactivate DNA programming. In this case, plausibly, “mechanisms” may refer to that strange being some call “God’ (not meaning to offend the atheists). limbicAccording to my calculations modern Caucasian humans are Version Seven of a heritage that stretches back billions of years (See http://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/28-billion-year-old-spheres-found-south-africa-how-were-they-made-002018). Theoretically we are a new version of Ciakar (See http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles84.htm and note the reference to Tyrannosaurus Rex. It is important) and, as such, are a combination of branches of what we call “man” and “reptilian”. To make things even more confusing (sometimes even I empathise with the materialists at times!), reptilians only “look like” reptiles, and in the case of the Draco-Ciakar; are closer aligned to feline character traits. There are pretty much no references I can offer as basis, although Simon Parkes does hint at this in some of his early AMMACH (See http://podcaststorage.weebly.com/ammach-files) interviews. Thus, the little that has been written in consideration of this phenomenon must be viewed as flawed from conception. If there was any material evidence that confirmed reptilian qualities of modern humans, it would be found in diligent analysis of our limbic system.

The Draco (split into Pteroid “dogs” and Ciakar “cats”. See http://www.exopaedia.org/Lizzies for additional information) mostly exist in domains beyond our appreciation of light frequencies. Indeed, their atomic makeup has transcended “carbon” status which means, in this case, they cannot usually be seen or even experienced by “normal methods”, affirming materialist sentiment. The ones that are material or can manifest are extremely adept at staying hidden. It should be no surprise as individual IQ’s of these creatures are beyond science comprehension. Additionally, they are aided by advanced technologies that will sufficiently cloak those desirous of invisibility (See http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/). Occasional blurry photos or films do emerge of reptilian entities usually focused on poorly lit caves (perhaps entrances to inner Earth domains?).

As to be expected, when a new photographic sighting does make the rounds, there are invariably hoards of angry, ignorant, foul mouthed sceptics gunning to ravage any sensibility. Attacks are often so well-orchestrated (and often very personal), it is as if armies of mercenaries are routinely employed to destabilise reason (See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00509.x/abstract). Though it will seem too far-fetched for even rudimentary consideration, very advanced Draco networks monitor every single human thought transaction and have the power to intervene and disrupt communications when necessary (See http://in5d.com/inner-earth-dracos-and-the-false-light-campaign/). This is done by manipulating the very same thing that Aristotle was talking about and it’s all in my book! (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/about)

Give me your cash, coz' I look after number one!

Give me your cash, coz’ I look after number one!

When looking at true human character traits, we are very like Ciakars. Our fundamental objective, as individuals, is to self-serve. No better is this validated than by the phrase “look after number one”. With the occasional exception of responsibilities accepted through bloodline (family) ties, all personal relationships are guided by self-gratification; friendships and marriages included. f20e15cbe3eba51e4844de20e002c81aAt the point any union ceases to gratify and is free of vested interests, it is over. The most prized versions of gratification are “greed based”. Thus, love-free partnerships (marriages) will continue indefinitely while both parties are being gratified. Lust versus money is the commonest type of trading exchange. Greed motivated dependence is not necessarily financial. Emotional support is also highly prized. Humans are naturally parasitic and form liaisons, in part, to improve self-esteem through determined hierarchical progression up the peer group ladder. Complex and sometimes convoluted reasoning motivates this self-serving and closed minded denial of true character. Effectively, in the same way we accentuate our compassionate individuality, we have more or less obscured any possibility of rational psychoanalysis of self. In fairness to humanity, Ciakars are much more extreme in their gradations towards magnetic social pulses. Thus, in their societies, there is always one set of laws for “those in the circle” (family, friends, meaningful alliances) which are variations of “higher virtue” and a different set of values for “strangers” outside. Even so Ciakar laws are draconian and so are ours.

When looking at true human character traits, we are very like Ciakars. Our fundamental objective, as individuals, is to self-serve. GIOTTO_AscensionNo better is this validated than by the phrase “look after number one”. With the occasional exception of responsibilities accepted through bloodline (family) ties, all personal relationships are guided by self-gratification; friendships and marriages included. At the point any union ceases to gratify and is free of vested interests, it is over. The most prized versions of gratification are “greed based”. Thus, love-free partnerships (marriages) will continue indefinitely while both parties are being gratified. Lust versus money is the commonest type of trading exchange. Greed motivated dependence is not necessarily financial. Emotional support is also highly prized. Humans are naturally parasitic and form liaisons, in part, to improve self-esteem through determined hierarchical progression up the peer group ladder. Complex and sometimes convoluted reasoning motivates this self-serving and closed minded denial of true character. Effectively, in the same way we accentuate our compassionate individuality, we have more or less obscured any possibility of rational psychoanalysis of self. In fairness to humanity, Ciakars are much more extreme in their gradations towards magnetic social pulses. the_ascension_by_jimmulvaney-d5yqj73Thus, in their societies, there is always one set of laws for “those in the circle” (family, friends, meaningful alliances) which are variations of “higher virtue” and a different set of values for “strangers” outside. Even so Ciakar laws are draconian and so are ours.

The opposite of gratification is inconvenience or, dare I say it, sacrifice (i.e. if you were gratified by an experience in any way, you have not made a sacrifice). Visible fronts of “reverse parasites” are the only possible remedies to change the current direction or course of the human condition. This would require sufficient numbers of selfless individuals supporting for support’s sake – no agendas, no double motives and no crafty strategies to tip the balance on deceitful, contradictory social standards. If enough would simply lovingly help, humanity would stand a chance at ascension providing most are swayed into some kind of cooperative, affirmative action.

beings_of_white_light_by_tranevoneinengel-d51q0o5

A few years ago I had a conference with “Pleiadian” Light Beings (See http://indigointernational.org/who-are-the-pleiadians/) via an intermediary. They told me many things about our fractious past and why we had reached this point [in time] in the way we did. However, the most relevant and insightful observation was their opinion that Karmic reincarnation was “more or less dead” now. Surely this must be wrong? Without it man, as a being, has no purpose whatsoever. It is high time for us to declare war on denial and apathy.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Denial and Apathy Will Restrict and Ultimately Halt Human Ascension

  1. Editors note: comment approved to highlight ignorance. Please review response carefully

    Wow, I am really proud of myself for being able to read all of this, there are some truly dark parts on the net! Surely, you are aware that this is the same drivel that the serpent spewed to the first man? Did you think it was clever to repackage it with pseudoscience? Before you say, “I already warned you about people who don’t acknowledge the extra dimension.” Let’s be clear that I do acknowledge it, but not the illusion which you have succumbed to. These are the same lies that came from the mouth of Alice Bailey, Helen Blavatsky, and all of the rest of “illumined” occult. Just like it supposed to be, as above so below, right? Hint : if they’re on “top,” where are you? If you can read this with a clear mind that you so openly profess to possess, then you should be aware that all of the nonsense you call goals for humanity has already been attempted before, and it failed. The very earth cried out to God, and when God looked down He saw that every thought that man had was continually evil. This is what your ascension reaped in the past and it is what it will reap with the coming son of perdition. Your “Pleiadian” “friend” was put on notice by the Creator a long time ago, it would be wise of you not to follow.

    • Let’s analyse this comment, moron (because that is what you are).

      You use the term serpent as if you are an authority. Man is a serpent created by serpents.

      Bailey (Blavatsky “disciple”) scripted the New Age movement and the UN treatise for “order”. If you bother to read other posts here, you will find I highlight the problem and define associations with the Illuminati, which (as the “New World Order”) IS the United States of America. They will bring down mankind if “we” don’t wake up. You, by your commeent, are SOUND ASLEEP.

      You use the word “nonsense” yet cite so examples. I am bored with this commentary and bored with you. Please don’t come back as any further correspondence of this nature will be viewed as spam.

      • Nice ad hominem. All you can say is that I am a moron? Really? I think you need a dictionary there on planet self-induced schizophrenia where you appear to be emanating your own new definitions for words that the rest of the planet has had a firm grasp on since words. Man is not a serpent, especially not some mysterious ourobouros that creates itself as you seem to think. My comment is not spam, no, it was a tailored response to your magnum opus, but it still looks black from here. If your theses are so well thought out, why is my comment so difficult for you to actually engage? It would seem your ideas don’t have a leg to stand on, is this why you liken it and everything else to a serpent? You lash out at me like a blind man drowning. I was only trying to help, which is something I can’t say for your “friends” from the elsewhere. To continue this foolish errand would unfortunately leave us both lifeless at the bottom of this metaphorical lake. So I will leave you with some scripture to ponder, as it applies to you and the aforementioned misled whose messages only differ in their intended audience but by no means in their content.

        “But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons”

      • Better comment, Capt MJ

        But again you “say” nothing. You speak in “double tongue” – something that separates pure Ciakars from the Atlantis genes.

        Do YOU know who you are?

  2. Pingback: Israel, Zionist Ambition, ISIS and US Affiliated Connections – Part Two | ozziethinker

  3. @muzzblumtsdave
    Dave,

    I’ve been looking for people like you.. Any chance we could get in touch and share sources?

    Looking over your other comments. I sense you’re a very like-minded and advanced researcher. With an attuned BS meter… Working our way to the bottom of the Rabbit Hole.. I can assure you I analyze things very carefully, and how how to separate the wheat from the chaff. I’m sitting on a huge cache of resources. I think there’s much we could exchange.

    If so, contact me at: AliceInWonderland@ruggedinbox.com

    Ozzie,
    You have a fascinating blog, I’m still evaluating it. For ex. your writing is superb. But there are many thing you say that I don’t understand. Because you writing is so verbose and on so many topics this will take me a while. Some articles have a dozen or sources Yet others offer none. I’m only swayed by and evidence; and use the Trivium methodology all the time, not just sometimes.

    I figure I’ll have to buy your books to find the answers to unresolved questions I have.

    • One of the problems with the “evidence” is it reinforces the materialists’ meme. Just as with the numerous videos on YouTube that propose that reptilian aspects of prominent, ambitious government leaders “blink in” and “out” of the visible spectrum, all other evidence will be downgraded to poor lighting/trick of the light or poor equipment. However, given new understanding as to how atoms “work”, a single body presenting multiple manifest planes is not beyond the realms of scientific reason or theory.

  4. I didn’t intent a long reply, but so be it.

    Anyone who’s a real Scientist (not a corporate sell-out) *knows there is no “material” as such. There is only the Information field: Aether and the invariant physical laws and consciousness which acts on it.

    Since at-least Planck we’ve know that.. And since the B.E. Condensate was proven in 1938 we’ve known that solid matter is made of nothing but energy waves. ‘we’ meaning informed physicists. For ‘mainstream’ Materialism you must understand there’s been a “Corruption” occurring in science, since at-least the 1920s. Students & professors these days don’t read old physics books anymore. Only what’s in shiny new texts Mc.Graw Hill/ Pearsons puts out.

    TPTB, not so long ago, have been so utterly ignorant of natural laws they actually *needed* Science to work properly if only for a while. For about 200 years wasa ‘Golden Era’ of unrestricted exploration of reality. It was only the rapid advances – in chemistry, physics, metallurgy – that made WWI & WWII even possible for them. They families had esoteric knowledge, Yes. But not the scientific knowledge to enable them rule a NWO empire. (Now WWIII looms on the horizon with their Neutron-bombs.)

    Nearly all of the ‘Materialists Reduction-ism’ DOGMA has come from the idiot Psychologists! Psychiatry & Neuroscience, and their ‘Overlord Masters’ trying to push pills down everyone’s throat. https://youtu.be/iUdlCnjaN4M?t=1070 They believe the Mind *is the Brain. They know nothing about the actual nature of reality. Do not confuse real Science & empiricism for their modern day corruptions.

    ——————————–
    So, on Those Reptilians:
    ‘videos on YouTube’, I’m not convinced. Anyone can fake imagery today (especially TPTB with their *explicit* goal to deceive people?) However, if you have a list of say the top 10 “most convincing” videos, I’d certainly look at it.. But I’d analyze every bit of info surrounding it. Including his/her other videos, the personal research history of who pointed it out. I’d like to know what other stones they’ve turned over. When one has only 5-10 videos and they’re all on Reptilians, that’s a big red flag to me.

    I saw one a researcher found from an old porno (early 1990s?) one time, THAT was pretty interesting…

    If you could find, perhaps archive footage from the 60’s & 70’s where these “transformations” occur, that would be most powerful evidence. As if the original can be tracked down, it can be proven definitively they were not digitally altered.. Film stores MUCH more information per frame than CCDs ever will.

    Don’t you love old film archives? I do:

    Here’s One piece of testimony which I’m 99.7% sure is authentic:

    But says nothing of the possession & shape-shifting aspect. It’s consistent with what some Exopolitics teach about Human & ET civilization interactions. (also perhaps Phil Schneider & friends?) Includes non-locality & teleportation. I’ve found a flurry of these types of stories in the 1990s. Jordan Maxwell has a collection… I find them most interesting.

    But Shape-shifting, other than “They Live” seem a much more recent phenomenon. Until Icke no-one of significance talked about it.

    I’ve seen others like Arizona Wilder’s and am quite intrigued by. But I need more.. I need multiple accounts, from unrelated people who’ve never crossed paths. And consistency is key…

    Also if one were to find specific “case studies” of Demonic possession that have strong reptilian qualities, that would be stronger evidence. Things like testimonies (by multiple witnesses), written reports / records, audio, (even EVF), video is fantastic… These of course would be not-famous people, unlike politicians & news anchors. But would give us more insight into the phenomenon than 10s ytube videos.

    Look whats happening right now with “Flat Earth”: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=%2Fm%2F032dv%2C%20%2Fm%2F01z8yb%2C%20David%20Icke&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B5
    Even researchers I know who were once rational & clear-thinking, have been sucked in. That’s the most striking example of ‘contagious’ disinfo. It spreads like wildfire.

    A diligent explorer considers all possibilities. Including that some aspect of reptilian (or ANY) phenomenon might be high-level coordinated dis-info. Even people I highly trust who put out the highest-level truth, at one time or another, have been ‘infected’ by shadowy acquaintances who feeds him/her bad Intel. That’s why I say I / we need strong evidence. You can’t get around it…

    Anyone who’s been down the wrong Rabbit Hole before, and back up again knows what I’m talking about… I read everything, and trust no-one. Or as the Russian say: “Trust but Verify.”

    I’m all ears, *If one has the evidence..

    “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting (or rejecting) it.” – Aristotle

    • There is a very important point you missed, and I pretty much concur with your view (ironically the theme of my next exo-politician post). Those with “extra-sensory” perception of the right type can see “beyond” the image and know what’s real/not.

  5. Pingback: A Modern Day “Love Cult” Assumes Detracting Truths Are Heresy | ozziethinker

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s