Why Atheism?

Writer at deskCommitted writer researchers should collect numbers of files separating various notes, information scraps and, perhaps, even relevant source articles sorted into ordered chaos. Because, for me, source articles invariably make different points or propose content that is not particularly relevant to illustrated paradigms, I don’t find these so important. Nevertheless, it is easy to collect clutter, perhaps with view to rebranding. Writing original content that parries with the educated spontaneity of Jon Rappoport, for instance, is a whole different ball park. That is what separates professionals from amateurs. For the seasoned few, thinking up beautiful, poignantly meaningful titles is probably the most challenging step of the process.

In my cache of “blog posts” mixed in with published content, I have composed eight new standalone working titles this year. Each, in word format, is content free and crying out for a spot on the Ozzie Thinker blog. Recently I created a special “to be written” file as many have been pending, neglected for several months. The item first selected was a lone blank page under the guise of “Problem, Reaction Deception”. Half an hour of serious brain straining came up with nothing productive by way of content so it has been put aside to tease muted inspiration. Of course, that isn’t to say I couldn’t represent the subject, but ideas were too jumbled, contrived and directionless for the Ozzie Thinker mission. Thus there was going to be no post on this topic today. “Prophesies, Predictions, Preconditioning” has punch. That would surely well up an avalanche of content? But no, it didn’t meet the requirement of the moment, so I selected the mildly innocuous “Why Atheism?”

Why indeed?

Comedian George Carlin entertains the crowd on May 1, 2003, at Veterans Memorial Civic Center in Lima, Ohio. Carlin, 71, whose staunch defense of free speech in his most famous routine "Seven Words You Can Never Say On Television" led to a key Supreme Court ruling on obscenity, died Sunday June 22, 2008. He went into St. John's Health Center in Santa Monica on Sunday complaining of chest pain and died later that evening, said his publicist, Jeff Abraham. (AP Photo/The Lima News, David G. Massey)

I am not a great fan of expletives. It has always seemed to me that when writers run out of ideas, have nothing to say on subjects explored, they stoop to base sentiment. Nevertheless one of my great heroes is the late but ever-present George Carlin whose foul terms sketch that dreadfully foul world around him. So, by the power of satire, I have used expletives with pride this time. Indeed, the conversational style of this piece, in part, reminds me of one of those deep, profound bar meetings, though, I assure readers, all information is free of intoxication. Also, unlike my other “to be written” entries, “Why Atheism?” at least had some content attached, though I cannot for the life of me remember what thought processes had conjured it or for what wider purpose I had been writing at the time. Oh yes, the simple message is straightforward enough by why did I begin with?

Conservation is “pointless”

Was the plan to foment yet another us versus them infomercial championing the environmentalists? The American “black hat white hat” syndrome is spreading to other parts of the globe. If the fantasy fits, then it must be unadulterated truth and you are either with us or “agin” us by that flawed reasoning. No, I will not sell out to truth because I like “side A”. Bullshit is bullshit if it is bullshit and not because who said it. The truth is non-negotiable.

There is a good reason for “conservation is pointless”, but the truth will not endear environmentalists as they are pawns of a largely hidden game. Jon Rappoport, I mentioned earlier, is one of the few that is beginning to get the gig, but it took him some time. He is beginning to see the light and coming to realise that light is very dark indeed. Let me rephrase that, for clarity. I said I only peddled the truth. The truth is I don’t know what Jon knows and I can only make assumptions by measurement of his writings. These, upon evaluation, have subtly changed over the months, years. He didn’t instantly draw the written conclusions he has. There has been a painstakingly thorough evaluation process.

reptilian human

I run another blog that specialises in matters that go beyond the human reality plane. It moves into the realms of mysterious paranormal, spiritual energies, hidden unseen forces with alien agendas supported by bizarre technologies that may make the impossible possible. All of this is part and parcel of what’s loosely termed exo-politics (which, from the Greek, means “outside the affairs of the people”). Exo-politics very much impacts atheist globalism. Yes, and the reason “black hat, white hat” is consuming other nations now is this is all part of the globalists’ divide and conquer strategy. To divide and conquer, you need “us” and “them”.

madoff_magazineHere’s a good example of how clever they are (the powers that control) compared to stupid human slaves. In the United States of America, corporate Medias (that represent the globalist governing elite) tell us that a very bad man has been thrown in jail because he conned a lot of people. This collapsed the housing market and saw honest, God fearing (but really, really complacent) folks reduced to homelessness. However, if you apply clarity to the picture, all their money is bogus. Yours is too. It’s not bogus because of the Federal Reserve or the “Banksters” or the Government or the Pretenders or Kevin Spacey or even Mickey Mouse. It’s bogus because you poor, stupid slaves endorse it every time you use it. By accepting it makes it real. That means some arbitrary bureaucrat can declare unoccupied housing (that would end the homelessness crisis in a heartbeat) belongs to someone important because of those pariah systems protecting bogus money. Ownership is ultimately imposed because of monetary support. If there was no money, rights would be determined by needs and/or priorities.Counterfeit-Money

Warm up over, let’s broach the subject, “Why Atheism?” Atheism runs deep. It perpetrates the core of existence and proposes spontaneous, hi-tech living robots must have no arbitrary right to anything as there is no God. You see, this is the primo [muted] message of atheism. Only historic ownership counts, providing the savages don’t lay claim to the land, because they don’t rate. If there was a God, then, ultimately, He would own all lands and humans along with the various animals, plants and insects would be ungrateful (is that the right word? Yes, I think it is) tenants. Oh how we whine! We are not even slightly grateful for our lives and then have the gall to complain when someone dies. The idea, survival of the fittest, is an extension of that reasoning. Per the “I’ve only got one life” ideology, I can amass 284 housing blocks with a write down value in excess of $1 billion and keep them empty because I am a survivor; I’m the fittest.

Why atheism?

god3 copyAtheism is because I am not connected to God as the communion umbrella linking all humans to everything. It means there is no obligation to support anything or anyone that contravenes the objectives of self-serving survival. With individual consciences battered and bruised, the people are expected to succumb to dogmatic laws that do their upmost to promote and enforce the agendas of the chosen few. If we take rhetoric and legislation defining murder, it has done nothing for the arbitrary massacres resulting from constant wars generated by the same bodies that lay claim they only exist to serve the needs of the people (creating strict policies designed to stop people murderin’ each other on their home turf). Over 1.5 million innocent Iraqis have laid down their lives because atheism wants to make a point. That point is it does not discriminate because every life is an expendable statistic when that suits the narrative line. Atheism doesn’t care.

Control does impact sharing. Just as with the farmer that regularly bombs his disused barns with insecticide to keep them clean, globalists have the same view about population masses. They kill off the pests with distain, using their dumb, ignorant militias. But hey, don’t fret.

It’s all for a great cause – Atheism.

To divide and conquer successfully you need causes; lots of them. False paradigms project environmentalists as the good guys supporting everything worthwhile. But the problem is “worthwhile” costs too much; there’s that bogus money again, so the pragmatists opt for industrial pollution.

Two for the price of one?

Two for the price of one?

What the eye can’t see must be ok, right? Remind me again; what colour is radiation? Well, it’s sure made some mushrooms and other things go funny colours in Japan. Was one baby born without a head? I don’t know, maybe that’s labouring the point.

Environmentalists either support or don’t support the scientists’ fake global warming and other strategies. That depends on whether they are with the mainstream or the alternative mainstream. Even “science” has branched into political fronts; notably geology versus archaeology. That’s because there is disharmony at the top and science religious-dogma is branded to suit the campaign needs of the individual sellers – those peddlers of reality. Believe it because we tell you what it looks like. Big-Cup-of-Shut-The-Fuck-Up_o_94445You’ve got to trust us. We’re credentialed scientists who know so much goofy stuff (pot calling the kettle black? But some good points nonetheless here). And if that doesn’t work, you’d better “shut the fuck up” because otherwise we’ll shut you out and send you to Coventry. No one will believe you after we’re done with you. We can’t have that reality bubble threatened in any way.

Look, I feel sure that there are many scientists out there that have done the research privately, instinctively knowing they are selling lies or distortions, but pretty much all have been warned by employers, peer groups, journalists that there are no go areas. The pyramids could only have been put up by savages using stone tools or some other stupid shit, in spite of the evidence, because that fits the dialogue. And it’s all done for control purposes augmented by bogus dollars. Medical too! Oh yeah, that’s the worst of the lot. Did you know they deliberately pollute the Earth to make people sick so they can heal the ones they want to “save”?

IMG_3376_resize

I feel we’ve come full circle. Now I am starting to remember why I wrote “conservation is pointless”. He’s not my friend, because I haven’t even met him, but I feel we would become friends if we ever did meet. So, by those terms, my friend, Jon Rappoport, has been tirelessly beating the drum over fake viruses, vaccines that seem to do little more than attacking the immune system and genetic modification of the foods we eat (we are what we eat, right?). Maybe I’ve been a little bit influential, because I said right out, from the start, that all (not “some”) viruses are caused by pollution. This isn’t some crackpot pseudo-science, because Wikipedia affirms my position. Let’s hope the “powers that be” don’t strike this reference because of me. Anyway here it is:

“[Viruses] are external particles that have found a way to exist in bodies whilst having no metabolic growth or reproductive capability”

Universal-Flu-Vaccine1Eh? Viruses are caused by inorganic matter that corrupts cell systems similar to the way cancers work. In many cases our bodies cope with attacks only producing flu-like symptoms but, in others, a virus can strip all the chromosome information (SARS) or turn cells into mush (Ebola). What’s the cause? It is the same in both cases: different forms of pollution. And, you know, the green monkey or the yak have different body functionalities (as much as “science” likes to humanise everything – one Godless standard for those damned accountants), so Ebola-style pollution symptoms might come out as, say, HIV in primates. Diploma Mill. Photo courtesy of SfaiezFancy that? That’s why the polio vaccine that was grown in the kidneys of chimpanzees and green monkeys transported HIV to humans that took the medication. Old failed chemo “wonder drug” AZT converted it into AIDS.

Apes as kingsYou can see where this is going? It doesn’t take too much to join the dots. Years ago, before the emergence of science, Kings worked with religions to control the sheep (this is the name given to the people by the Bible). Over time people became more and more rebellious, because the bright ones saw through all the superstitions (that’s the fancy word for bullshit). Anti-royal forces (made up of rich merchants with next to no royal blood) backed science to usurp power from the aristocrats. There were other methods and strategies, but the science route supports the dialogue thus far, so that’s the one I’ll explore.

Initially the religions still had enormous sway and the people could not do without their kings or queens. But over the centuries, incessant Medias challenged the reality bubble, finally smashing it with the onset, firstly, of the silver screen, but more radically with television – piped propaganda 24/7. People stopped going to church because of TV, so it’s not all bad. Ha.

henry-kissingerThis coincided with the sexual revolution, consumerism and mass production of vaccines in the 1960’s (also opening up futures markets in support of Vietnam…oh boy). Never a more ugly combination of factors altering the group psyche of humanity could be imagined. Indeed, it was the success of toxic vaccines and contraception geared to sterilise useless eaters that ensured people embraced alternative religions. But, no matter what badge they waived in authority, Christian, Buddhist, Jew, Islamic, everyone was atheist as all religions had been compressed into a common, centralised dialogue that supported globalist diktat.

Initially, pollution wasn’t taken seriously, but the New Age aspect of atheism pushed the idea of a nurturing authority championing environmentalists, accountants that stood against the negative aspect of wars, health and a new proto-religion that twosteps with Catholicism’s “cosmic Christ”. The United Nations was the universal atheist voice that cared; only interested in people’s wellness.

dbf8af596c9aac3de7d941df78515436

Atheism had broken the Russian peoples from 1917 and this was the globalists’ test. But, in order to confuse, they reintroduced religions there after the veil of communism (an alternative?) was lifted. Reinstated traditions may have been the payoff, but the problem was all ancient wisdom had been sucked out in order to reinforce the globalist agenda to deny conscience. People visit these houses of God to be good atheists.

reptilianBy the turn of the 19th century it was becoming clear how damaging pollution was to man. In the interests of producing able bodied fodder for war, mild attempts were made to clean up the globe. Nevertheless super speed technological advancements gave industrialisation an “energy fizz” which saw rapid acceleration of projects outpacing globe-saving efforts. indexAdvancements in medical science gave the powers confidence that they could pollute with irreverence because drugs would always save the chosen ones (or harvested organs for more serious complaints).

One of the great global polluters is oil (plastic is a bi-product that caused consumerism and mass production). This and toxic vaccines are designed to weaken everyone’s immune system (elites included). Bogus money supports both enterprises and the people are so mesmerised by it, they cannot break free of its hold. Oil is so powerful, it affects the value of money and this impacts the price of good drugs to use against pollution. Professional deceivers, parading globalist backed credentials, provide verbose overanalyses in loving support of their masters who, in turn, create armies of affirmers (or debunkers against the alternative position) to champion flawed or false churned reasoning.

oilcoveredbird

That is…why atheism?

Advertisements

Denial and Apathy Will Restrict and Ultimately Halt Human Ascension

Internationally, I have not set the world on fire – yet! Nevertheless I am expanding my range through journalistic relationships with the Global Freedom Movement (See http://globalfreedommovement.org/), Conscious Life News (See http://consciouslifenews.com/) and other platforms.

Locally, in specific circles, I am known as the “Draco man”. For those not in the know, Draco (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/draco) is a pet name given to a group of hidden ghoulish entities that manifest as reptilians, giant bats and werewolves. Before readers entirely switch off; there has been serious consideration given to this field by respected names, such as Sol Luckman’s (See http://www.phoenixregenetics.org/books/potentiate-your-dna) dedication to the removal of malignant Jinn (plural of Genie). Indeed there is a whole movement devoted to our bodies’ electro-magnetic energy fields (See http://www.barbarabrennan.com/), sometimes called Chakras or Meridians. For those that specialise, known experts of repute cover the Draco’s manifest forms and character traits. Notably David Icke, James Bartley and even the great Simon Parkes (See http://simonparkes.wix.com/home) conjure decidedly negative imagery (See http://www.whale.to/b/bartley3.html), even when they are trying to be positive. This is where I, largely, differ (See https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/on-from-peter-maxwell-slattery/).

GeorgeCarlin

Thus I have collected plenty of wilful critics over time. The main reason I have critics is because I strip everything back to its raw essence, not humbly as a reincarnated Prophet, but rather as an agitator that creates booming, unappreciated tonal waves. Naturally the information I serve up both contradicts and conflicts with existing, sometimes long established, belief systems (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/beliefs-and-ufos/). If I had a divine purpose in life, it would be to test and expose rogue belief systems. The problem with that mission is just about all belief systems are maligned in some way, as shown in my reference link. Even the great, late black comedian George Carlin (See http://georgecarlin.com/) was not always right, but he is the one that has come closest to “raw” that I have found. To be clear, I can’t say I go out of my way to mimic George, but I find his mindset so refreshing, if he set the standards humanity might just make it. Internationally, I have not set the world on fire – yet! Locally, in specific circles, I am known as the “Draco man”. There are plenty of critics, of course, but I will explain why later.

15176711-Igloo-at-night-3D-and-hand-drawing-elements-combined--Stock-Photo

This is the problem with humanity, currently. Beginning at very early ages, people build invisible igloos around themselves and these act as impermeable filters against anything that contradicts current belief “status-quo”. Charismatic individuals or well-placed proverbs can chip away some of the igloo’s veneer, but real change will only come from extended, prolonged periods of systemic, honest inner assessment (a form of meditation). But the real problem is the perceived lack of respect of anyone outside the igloo. Everyone, without exception, that I have encountered believes they are individually special. And to be brutally frank, to be individually special, means they are better than everyone else. However, for anyone that is sincere about individual specialness, venturing outside the igloo to make direct one-on-one comparisons is the only way, on balance, to demonstrate who shines. Instead (safely ensconced in their icy cubicles), by dismissing competition, “specialness” is immortalised.

stock_photo_indexI don’t dispute some may well worship a sports star, love a great musician or become inspired by a brilliant scientist. So an Olympian can lap a pool in thirty seconds when regular folks would take ten minutes, but they only swim faster. Clearly they are better technicians than ordinary people but, by that vein, are not supernatural. The same can be said about footballers, mathematicians, doctors and so on. Social luminaries rarely challenge the threshold of individual specialness and when they do, they are never heard of again. “Challenge” is a great word (See http://theleanthinker.com/2012/08/25/the-power-of-challenge/). People feel safe around celebrities because they are not challenged by them.

Now, if someone came along who was able to turn a swimming pool’s watery contents into ice simply using thought; that would be moving into the paranormal (See http://www.pbs.org/mythsandheroes/myths_four_shangrila.html)? That would threaten the generalised “specialness” of the individual; particularly as being special is the belief system’s way of affirming a sole connection to the divine (See http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/12/15/theres-an-organ-in-your-brain-which-seats-your-soul-meet-your-pineal-gland/). In other words, no matter what anyone else thinks or does and, within reasonable limits, no matter how the individual behaves, his or her relationship with the divine will always make them special. Thus, when I come along and say I can read energy fields and can see, not guess, what you are made of and, more importantly, where you came from, audiences become very sceptical. hqdefaultThat is because scepticism is the igloo’s primary defence against ideas that attack the status-quo (See https://books.google.com.au/books?id=y6id6WOsuG4C&pg=RA1-PA64&lpg=RA1-PA64&dq=scepticism+defense+mechanism&source=bl&ots=HFcuAMI9ih&sig=MVzSdDyVZMTrh5IJakRhp44B1WU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAWoVChMIt-XZvrCOxwIVQyumCh1sfwCk#v=onepage&q=scepticism%20defense%20mechanism&f=false). The status-quo, in this case, is the unimpeached specialness of the individual. Therefore, the only ones that have shown any interest in my paranormal abilities are those that share them. To add to the intrigue, people are, with scant exception, faithless. I wonder, for instance, whether the visually blind truly believe there is colour. How could they believe in something they have never seen?

Focusing on the root of the problem, there happens to be a common set of conditions that have formed a manifesto loosely called “materialism” (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/materialism). The primo basic tenet of this philosophy is; if it can be measured (physical) it exists. Expanding (and detracting at the same time) Newton’s record, modern day materialists presume that which cannot be measured does not exist. Or, to put it another way:

“The theory or belief that nothing exists except matter and its movements and modifications”

Is this God?

Is this God?

A branch of the study called pragmatism, materialism has three distinct versions: reductionism, atheism and scepticism. Reductionism acts as the communal igloo for modern science-thinkers (is that an oxymoron?). Great powers of the like of Richard Dawkins espouse that the most effective science recording method is predicative. Therefore, just about all his work is concluded before data is collected or analysis of detail begins. His science becomes divinely inspirational as all findings that contradict the plan are either ignored or rejected and that which affirms the plan makes it stronger. Ultimately, mantras back wisdom (sic) that is beyond challenge, or so he believes.

Regularly I meet people that claim they are Jews, Catholics. Muslims and so on, but always the pragmatic (can I say “Pharisaic” [See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pharisaic]?) Religions. These people commonly shrink from “inner faith” based doctrines, such as the Kabbalah or Buddhism or Taoism, for instance. Regardless of individual claims, all are atheists. Prayer is conditional venting to a fantasy father-figure. God-Loves-Me-Just-as-I-Am-Rainbow-Pride-Heart-173x150Thus, worshipers are faithless. Their only remote connection to the divine is in the form of that specialness (I mentioned earlier) individuals cultivate from synthetic belief systems. I guess that is why there is so much scepticism in God – because belief systems that support the divine are knowingly false. Similar to predicative reductionism, dogmatic religions lay out road maps for “faith” (control) that must not be questioned by obedient followers (See https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/out-the-darkness/201412/dogmatic-and-spiritual-religion). Followers, in reality, are nothing more than slavish robots. Without faith there is no belief and these religious “subscribers” are also nothing more than atheists who “pose” via associations with political clubs. Readers must never lose sight of the fact that politics is the “affairs of people” (after the Greek). Religions that manage the affairs of the people are political orders/parties in all but name.

religion_politics_paints

Science has learnt variations in testing methods will show different data sets and, more often than not, see dissimilar conclusive results emerging. I can give my own simple example. Many years ago I engaged a pointless study occupying an idle mind. lucky-craps-dice-poker-cards-old-horseshoe-american-west-legend-antique-game-rolling-out-chance-number-seven-vintage-37741352The experiment consisted of me, two balanced white dice with black dots and a kitchen table. The first two rolls produced what craps players’ term as “snake eyes” (or “double” ones). I could have shut down the experiment there and then. Conclusions would have shown “balanced dice will always produce snake eyes when rolled on an level table”. Instead I continued, tediously, and rolled the dice a further 9,998 times. The data, surprisingly, showed that certain roll combinations were much more common or uncommon than others defying (materialist) statistical probability.

Was that reflective of me and my technique? The sceptic, whose fanatical belief in the correctness of empirical probability tables, might request a sample of 100,000 rolls to offset the error. If anomalies were consistent (or, in greater likelihood, “changed”), then the sample might be extended to a million rolls and so on until desired probability outcomes were demonstrated. My point is sceptics are merely determined to be right and will use whatever means that sanctify ambitions of correctness. If the dice sample required only thirty six rolls to map a perfect probability curve, the illusion is complete. Pressing on with another million spins might defeat sanctified propaganda dressed as evidence. Therefore, a classic sceptic ploy of these wilful deceivers is not to continually review “deemed proven” data. How can mankind possibly ascend if truth is perpetually rigged to further the ambitions of the chosen few?

59091254

Returning to my enigmatic title “Draco man” (See http://exopolitician.wordpress.com), I have been known to prompt educated criticisms of the ilk of “What an earth is this twit talking about?” from time to time. “Name calling” is a typical defamation tactic used by those determined augment “order”. Sadly the same sorry “Pharisaic aligned” crews are the offenders – reductionists, atheists and sceptics. In fairness to them, and let’s make no bones about it, the Draco technically don’t exist. So, in truth, on one level there is nothing to talk about because we are moving into energetic domains (those electro-magnetic fields I touched on earlier). Certainly from the science-reductionist authority, it would be hard to explain the Draco effectively. However, as this “ties in” with man’s ascension, I cannot avoid it. Indeed, the event or stage process is referring to an energetic shift of man which is so significant it may even impact our atomic structure.

Materialism might be a modern day concept, but overriding philosophies stretch back to the dawn of time and it can be seen in some of the earliest surviving evidence of critical thinking (See http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/a-brief-history-of-the-idea-of-critical-thinking/408). Without acknowledgement of the extra-dimensional, it is impossible to discuss the Draco professionally. aristotleSuffice to say, mostly (perhaps with the exception of “echoes of Plato”) the Greek greats did not discuss things that go bump in the night (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Things_That_Go_Bump_in_the_Night). Aristotle’s plan for the universe (See http://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/senior/cosmicengine/classicalastronomy.html), perhaps unfairly interpreted, ensured that a flat, cuboid hollow Earth was at the centre of everything and powered by the sun. Incendiary stars were nothing other than twinkling (crystalline) “prisms”. The moon, according to Aristotle, was evidence of the divide which marked the boundary for celestial domains of heavenly refuge. How long, be it adapted many times, was that blueprint for existence current? 2000 years? How would he have reacted to the Draco “concept”? Ironically, as I explain in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (Look it up on Amazon or make a donation at https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/about – and sceptics, please, please don’t buy it as the text will only give you a “beliefs embolism”), in some ways, bizarrely, Aristotle’s most unlikely opinions (given modern science-propaganda) were correct.

Whilst on the subject of my books, as a prolific writer, there are going to be a number of volumes. Number two of the series is provisionally titled, “A New World Order”. This is in the throes of completion, but the following one, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity” will discuss human origins in relation to the Draco and Annunaki’s hierarchical management of our genetics. And this is very pertinent to discussions regarding our ascension as any [genetic] change will be directly reflective of the mechanisms that activate or deactivate DNA programming. In this case, plausibly, “mechanisms” may refer to that strange being some call “God’ (not meaning to offend the atheists). limbicAccording to my calculations modern Caucasian humans are Version Seven of a heritage that stretches back billions of years (See http://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/28-billion-year-old-spheres-found-south-africa-how-were-they-made-002018). Theoretically we are a new version of Ciakar (See http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles84.htm and note the reference to Tyrannosaurus Rex. It is important) and, as such, are a combination of branches of what we call “man” and “reptilian”. To make things even more confusing (sometimes even I empathise with the materialists at times!), reptilians only “look like” reptiles, and in the case of the Draco-Ciakar; are closer aligned to feline character traits. There are pretty much no references I can offer as basis, although Simon Parkes does hint at this in some of his early AMMACH (See http://podcaststorage.weebly.com/ammach-files) interviews. Thus, the little that has been written in consideration of this phenomenon must be viewed as flawed from conception. If there was any material evidence that confirmed reptilian qualities of modern humans, it would be found in diligent analysis of our limbic system.

The Draco (split into Pteroid “dogs” and Ciakar “cats”. See http://www.exopaedia.org/Lizzies for additional information) mostly exist in domains beyond our appreciation of light frequencies. Indeed, their atomic makeup has transcended “carbon” status which means, in this case, they cannot usually be seen or even experienced by “normal methods”, affirming materialist sentiment. The ones that are material or can manifest are extremely adept at staying hidden. It should be no surprise as individual IQ’s of these creatures are beyond science comprehension. Additionally, they are aided by advanced technologies that will sufficiently cloak those desirous of invisibility (See http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/). Occasional blurry photos or films do emerge of reptilian entities usually focused on poorly lit caves (perhaps entrances to inner Earth domains?).

As to be expected, when a new photographic sighting does make the rounds, there are invariably hoards of angry, ignorant, foul mouthed sceptics gunning to ravage any sensibility. Attacks are often so well-orchestrated (and often very personal), it is as if armies of mercenaries are routinely employed to destabilise reason (See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00509.x/abstract). Though it will seem too far-fetched for even rudimentary consideration, very advanced Draco networks monitor every single human thought transaction and have the power to intervene and disrupt communications when necessary (See http://in5d.com/inner-earth-dracos-and-the-false-light-campaign/). This is done by manipulating the very same thing that Aristotle was talking about and it’s all in my book! (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/about)

Give me your cash, coz' I look after number one!

Give me your cash, coz’ I look after number one!

When looking at true human character traits, we are very like Ciakars. Our fundamental objective, as individuals, is to self-serve. No better is this validated than by the phrase “look after number one”. With the occasional exception of responsibilities accepted through bloodline (family) ties, all personal relationships are guided by self-gratification; friendships and marriages included. f20e15cbe3eba51e4844de20e002c81aAt the point any union ceases to gratify and is free of vested interests, it is over. The most prized versions of gratification are “greed based”. Thus, love-free partnerships (marriages) will continue indefinitely while both parties are being gratified. Lust versus money is the commonest type of trading exchange. Greed motivated dependence is not necessarily financial. Emotional support is also highly prized. Humans are naturally parasitic and form liaisons, in part, to improve self-esteem through determined hierarchical progression up the peer group ladder. Complex and sometimes convoluted reasoning motivates this self-serving and closed minded denial of true character. Effectively, in the same way we accentuate our compassionate individuality, we have more or less obscured any possibility of rational psychoanalysis of self. In fairness to humanity, Ciakars are much more extreme in their gradations towards magnetic social pulses. Thus, in their societies, there is always one set of laws for “those in the circle” (family, friends, meaningful alliances) which are variations of “higher virtue” and a different set of values for “strangers” outside. Even so Ciakar laws are draconian and so are ours.

When looking at true human character traits, we are very like Ciakars. Our fundamental objective, as individuals, is to self-serve. GIOTTO_AscensionNo better is this validated than by the phrase “look after number one”. With the occasional exception of responsibilities accepted through bloodline (family) ties, all personal relationships are guided by self-gratification; friendships and marriages included. At the point any union ceases to gratify and is free of vested interests, it is over. The most prized versions of gratification are “greed based”. Thus, love-free partnerships (marriages) will continue indefinitely while both parties are being gratified. Lust versus money is the commonest type of trading exchange. Greed motivated dependence is not necessarily financial. Emotional support is also highly prized. Humans are naturally parasitic and form liaisons, in part, to improve self-esteem through determined hierarchical progression up the peer group ladder. Complex and sometimes convoluted reasoning motivates this self-serving and closed minded denial of true character. Effectively, in the same way we accentuate our compassionate individuality, we have more or less obscured any possibility of rational psychoanalysis of self. In fairness to humanity, Ciakars are much more extreme in their gradations towards magnetic social pulses. the_ascension_by_jimmulvaney-d5yqj73Thus, in their societies, there is always one set of laws for “those in the circle” (family, friends, meaningful alliances) which are variations of “higher virtue” and a different set of values for “strangers” outside. Even so Ciakar laws are draconian and so are ours.

The opposite of gratification is inconvenience or, dare I say it, sacrifice (i.e. if you were gratified by an experience in any way, you have not made a sacrifice). Visible fronts of “reverse parasites” are the only possible remedies to change the current direction or course of the human condition. This would require sufficient numbers of selfless individuals supporting for support’s sake – no agendas, no double motives and no crafty strategies to tip the balance on deceitful, contradictory social standards. If enough would simply lovingly help, humanity would stand a chance at ascension providing most are swayed into some kind of cooperative, affirmative action.

beings_of_white_light_by_tranevoneinengel-d51q0o5

A few years ago I had a conference with “Pleiadian” Light Beings (See http://indigointernational.org/who-are-the-pleiadians/) via an intermediary. They told me many things about our fractious past and why we had reached this point [in time] in the way we did. However, the most relevant and insightful observation was their opinion that Karmic reincarnation was “more or less dead” now. Surely this must be wrong? Without it man, as a being, has no purpose whatsoever. It is high time for us to declare war on denial and apathy.