Devilish New Year Aspirations

Christmas is over and though I aim to make this upbeat, anarchistic semi-satire, I cannot help feeling a pang of what if? This may be a bit early for the New Year, but I am hoping readers are given enough time to reflect for sincere resolutions. My next post will be released very soon and those eagerly waiting to read my book, “Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons” will have the opportunity of contributing for the first section.

How does Mr Scrooge compare with you?

How does Mr Scrooge compare with you?

My gracious donators did not relieve my pressing personal problems, but that would take a magician or three. They did, however, save humanity. For it was their selfless acts that showed me there must be others, lurking, shy of the attention and the responsibility. Sadly both donators were agents of the hoard of global bloggers I visit. These tireless writers contribute enough. It is so sad that none of the wallflowers could stump up anything that amounts to more than gawping. (You all have a second chance to show yourselvesscroll down)

Observant visitors will notice a sparkling new section of recommended bloggers (assuming admins has figured how to set it up). Look up. One of the links is a brand new exo-political resource with the mission of keeping the corporate “disclosure movement” honest. Bigalow Corporation recently hijacked MUFON and all its assets reducing the organisation to little more than a “propaganda machine”.

Turkey anyone?

Turkey anyone?

As for other websites, PPJ is a blog I highly rate being a tireless front against political corruption, the erosion of reasonable constitutional values, poor treatment of horses, aged care malpractice, our withering precious environment and so on. Peter Schreiner visits so regularly he is our resident poet (strictly vegan, as much as I try to convince him turkey is ok at Christmas, thanksgiving). Though I am not absolutely sure he exists in the flesh, a transcendental mind of the calibre of Jon Rappoport should be welcome anywhere and everywhere.

Alright, enough of the boring stuff. It’s time to focus on cam girls again. As I recommended in the post A Perverse Intermission, every decent student of psychology should ogle at cam girls at least two hours a day. The sacrifice we students of truth make! Those that have braved this treacherous pursuit will agree that volumes of girls, invariably well painted, of different sizes and shapes attempt to lose articles of clothing, slowly. It is interesting but some as young as 25 call themselves “mature”, usually, I confess, when they are overly proportioned. Conversely other women have given themselves the title Lolita and variations. One was not a day younger than 32, I swear. If my memory serves me correctly, the Israelites have a better slang word for lolita. This is “hebe” and means “the stage at which a girl blossoms into womanhood”; presumably age 12-15.

When all clothes are discarded, they do more things; far, far more risqué in some case. There is a mystery. At least one use of the title “virgin” has been noted, after the Madonna, maybe? Framing flickering video portals are robust group chat consoles that display members “nicks” by order of rank. Queues of would be tippers are perched like penguins on the precipice of an ice stack. Aimless and disrespectful chatters bark incessant commands at their virtual forlorn maidens. Eventually one of those teetering Spheniscidae titans’ “slips” and dumps a small pile of cash into a bucket on the floor. And so the clothes do shed…..

The epitaph of commerce; death of miser Scrooge

The epitaph of commerce; death of miser Scrooge

I like to give and feel historical details of my acts of philanthropy might inspire other givers (give is the opposite of take, for those that aren’t sure) to follow suit. A very small sample begins at age eight when I “found” $20 and gave it to my father. It took him seven years to pay the money back and dividends had trebled with interest (mum made sure of that!). Until I was 25, acts of generosity were always pinned on the expectation of repayment or reciprocation. Then something magical happened. I lived in a shared house (who could afford anything else at that age?) and one of my housemates had had a falling out with the landlord. He had nowhere to go and nothing to go with. I gave him 300 pounds sterling because I knew he needed enough to survive for a month. That was the equivalent of 1000 pounds today. It was a gift and I did not want or expect any return favour. That was my way of cleansing the world and it felt good; really good.

Tiny Tim; a beautiful, vital disabled human being

Tiny Tim; a beautiful, vital disabled human being

In the same year, I gave nine hundred pounds sterling to a workmate, because at the company I worked a customer had tipped me generously for doing a good job. Though I expected some form of reciprocation, none was forthcoming and I did not really care. Along this well-travelled path I have rarely given to charity and do my upmost to avoid contributing to government. As a Global non-citizen it would be hypocritical of me to do so. The bulk of my acts of unconditional giving have been directed at South East Asia. In total I have devoted what would amount to a small house over the years, never in “penny” sums, always something significant; useable. You know what? I would do it all again, given the opportunity. More recently, in these times of dire straits, I have still usually managed to find the $2 or $4 “tax deductable” (she produces a hand printed slip) amount to support the lady that stands outside my corporate supermarket representing local intellectually disabled people.

Don’t those with superior intelligence have a calling to support those that fall short of the requirement?

I don't "look" hungry

I don’t “look” hungry

This Christmas I had to shuffle by, head hung in shame. I had not done enough even to raise $2.

Come for some HONEY

Come for some HONEY

Things must be tough for everyone this year. My local online casino has managed to call me or text eight times in three days, including a courtesy contact on Christmas Day. What a nice bunch of guys! Back in 2011 I took advantage of a UK online casino offer, invested $70 and turned it into $2,200. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, dark threats of lawyers, lengthy extended correspondences, they eventually coughed up. My next attempt was not so lucky. $50 saw non-payment of $2,500 from a listed rogue casino. I did find this resource to assist recreational gamers. Fundamentalist Puritans assert that gambling is wrong, yet turning an irrelevant amount into a relevant one is enough to save a situation or even a life. Therefore, I am all for limited gambling in the right circumstances.

Online prostitution, gambling, charity (oh yes, those online donations too) are all forms of commerce managed by Judaism (Puritanism is a version). This is not what Judaism was, but what it has become. Every single government of the world creates laws that are built on tenets of Pharisaic principle. No one is “free”, other cultures notwithstanding. Pharisaic principle ensures that only the fit survive, no one has the right to life, money is God and to offer unconditional support is sacrilege. Ancient Judaic doctrine preceded the Torah (aspects can be evidenced in parts of the Talmud, which now consists of 6,000 pages whittled down from an original 30,000, and the Bible, also severely “downsized”). That is why the Pharisees always conflicted with the Sadducees. These have been replaced by Republicans and Democrats. Jesus was unaffiliated, an “independent”. Gracious Jews face the wrath of anti-Semitism. Though, incessant whining is showing anti-Semitic indoctrination is slowly but surely losing friends. Even people in high places are beginning to rebel. So worried are the Zionist elite, they are giving away a book to Puritan congregations instructing them how to think.

I know you all feel strongly about not giving to strangers; but what happens when strangers give to you?

Look he's legless, but not drunk or high

Look he’s legless, but not drunk or high

On my travels, I regularly meet people that don’t give to charities “out of principle” (although I have never been able to ascertain what that principle is – greed?). Let us think the unthinkable and discover the clock turned forward sees you homeless; yes YOU. Are you going to turn down charity “out of principle”? Every time you have some personal misfortune, can and does no one help? Of course, I am not referring to relationships built on trade; those Judaic commerce principles, such as agreed bloodline reciprocation and “tit for tat” friendships. Our reality is chaotic mob rule manipulated to induce reactionary governance with alternative (often unrelated) agendas that are sold by faux Medias and corrupt hacks posing as journalists that are not worthy of darts of phlegm. Everything, in this reality, is geared to aiding and abetting a rigged trading mechanism. Trading machinations are nothing more than manipulated “poker” auctions. No fixed prices here, just fixing. Did you ever think what it might be like to be homeless; not “drug addled” homeless, REAL HOMELESS?

A Happy New Year is one of resolution

Without “home truths” there can be no hope for resolution. I read a post about the “traitor for exposing the truth” Bradley Manning, PPJ kindly supplied. What government thought about their armed forces could have been more clearly illustrated than the series of events that led to the torching of a war veteran’s makeshift “tent city” pitched in protest at the US Capitol, Washington in 1932. World War One home comers had been offered riches by government and given fire. Was shining McArthur unsupported in his attack? Surely the National Guard assisted in dispensing the wrath of commerce against the “national threat”. A hero one day shall become a traitor the next.

I ask conscientious readers whether they know why Nagasaki was nuked to “supposedly” end World War Two. In the 1920’s and 1930’s this Japanese nest of islands was a popular rest and recreation stop for people of all classes. It was known for beautiful colours and beautiful women (an earlier version of our “cam girls”), both in generous supply. Your Pharisaic masters “cleansed” Nagasaki for two reasons. Firstly, they love to purge “sin” (as expressed by the St Augustine tradition emphasising the letters of St Paul) available to plebeian classes. Secondly, they were determined that branded slaves (citizens) would not go “absent without leave” (AWOL) after the fun (war, death and attrition) was over.

Decent slaves would never be homeless

Real homeless people don't have to look "nasty"

Real homeless people don’t have to look “nasty”

That takes us full circle because, conscientious readers, the greatest sin and dereliction of duty is to be homeless. You see, all homeless people have dialled out of the system. Because it became clear in the 1960’s that populations were growing too fast for “commerce” (rigged trade) to support them (as slaves), they turned out all but for the most dangerous mentally ill people onto the streets. After the (many veterans) “skid row” experiment, they also welcome alcoholics and, more recent, drug addicts to huddle street corners in plain sight. It was designed to stigmatise homelessness. Decent people were brainwashed, unable to see it for what it was. What do YOU see today?

To conclude and, once again, referring to the wise Jon Rappoport who has been tirelessly crusading against the joint Monsanto, FDA and “health foods industry” front attempting to turn everything natural into GMO. The good news for the elite is there will be non-GMObillionaire foods” a-plenty. The debate is being conducted on arguments determining whether retailers should bother labelling GMO infected foods. Partisan commercial stakeholders have levelled the rhetoric on pure commerce with sentiment like “Non GMO foods will see a marketing advantage for those committed to labelling their products”. The cost of labelling will be prohibitive opening the doors for billionaire foods.

This satisfies the food control blueprint established as per the 1971-75 25 year plans (valid for millennia) with contributing illustrious think-tanks such as David Rockefeller’s own Trilateral Commission (founded 1973). Soylent Green (1973) adequately expressed their wishes, with ignorant, cannibalistic peoples crammed into dusty markets overlaying a culture of euthanasia. We don’t want a world full of useless old eaters. The price of a jar of untainted strawberry jam was $200 (that’s $4000 in today’s money). That’s the plan. What’s the action?

Donate Button

PayPal support

Our Anunaki masters tried to wipe out humans because of our “incessant chatter” and [assumed] inaction. Humans, generally, do remind me of something…

A "committee" of gobbling turkeys

A “committee” of gobbling turkeys


Memory Manipulation


My last post predominantly focused on the current Ebola crisis. Some time back I mentioned that the 1960’s was such a traumatic period for the globalists, that 1971-75 was devoted to rehashing 25 year [policy] plans which might impact the next millennia. That is why the Trilateral Commission (TC) was formed in 1973 by David Rockefeller, officially, as an “informal ideas forum”. However, the (currently) 87 strong membership list pretty much runs policy for US, UK, West Germany, and Japan and so on with respect to Globalist objectives. The familiar catchphrase, “problem, reaction, solution” used to manage human cattle is more precisely a management of reactions and responses. Therefore when something happens, an event, there is an outcome which sees a reaction, potentially, and, if so, there is a response. Some events are fizzers. A reaction was planned, but the cattle stayed lethargic. They didn’t “get it”. In this case, it would be time for the prodders. A short, sharp shock will wake any docile beast; a mini blitzkrieg to put the fear of God into fertile, uninformed imaginations.

With respect to the Ebola virus, along the lines of this template, there is no Ebola virus. None has ever been isolated, so the only evidence for Ebola is “Ebola symptoms” because the virus has not been discovered. This is a similar case for HIV which, we have learned, does not cause AIDS. There is a link, because, just as with Ebola there is a strong case to say that the medication actually causes illness and possible death. For HIV it was the toxic, shelved, “chemo” drug AZT. The Globalists certainly do not invest in medication that is not going to be used. Therefore, if it does not work, or it is highly dangerous, a toxic poison, it will be used by hook or by the crooks. The only exception to that rule is the dumping of dud, spent stocks off on suckers, such as “well meaning” African tin-pot dictators. That’s what the cattle are for; to mop up the refuse. I have subsequently learnt that Ebola might be caused by pesticides, pollution, a species of snake poison and Typhoid medication. Most recently of all however, an interesting article appeared exposing a deliberate attempt to contaminate the water systems in Liberia. Formaldehyde in large enough quantities will induce “Ebola like symptoms”. It is interesting the current “outbreak” allegedly started in Liberia. We must also consider the effects of a toxic “experimental” vaccine on poor African suffers. So negatively potent was the solution, that mobs raided their hospitals to remove the sick. We saw the reaction. The Globalist response was to send in the American military to issue “medication” (sic) at gunpoint. Finally, of course, we will never forget that the Ebola strain (which has never been isolated and does not exist) was patented by the CDC in 2009 (the year Julie Gerberding moved from the CDC to Merck Vaccines) and implicates Bill Gate’s “philanthropy”. Why?

In the US we learn that alleged Ebola “positive” staged quarantines are not recognised by family members and, at least one has links to the CDC and Obama administration. Eleven TC members have administration posts in the current Obama government. Jon Rappoport, a blogger I follow, kindly reminded us that pandemic “strategy” is the scripted response resulting from the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 exercise (after all that had happened in 2009), “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. Pandemic strategy was consolidated after the mother of all reactions to the Swine Flu. Though the virus (assuming it exists) formally killed 22, the CDC laid claim to millions of infections and deaths. This promoted another manipulator (connected to the globalist International Monetary Fund [IMF]), World Health Organisation (WHO), to respond by giving the swine flu its highest “terror rating” – category 6. A deliberate strategy of making people sick and then sending in the medics to heal them seems to have been in place prior to the 1960’s, perhaps starting after World War II. Ebola has shocked me, not because it is unconscionable to manipulate in that way, but because my memory did not work.

My memory had been manipulated. Before I discuss the reason, it is important to note that error is a blessed thing when it is recognised. As a concert trained pianist, I have come to determine that at the very point I say, “I know”, I don’t. Students and teachers share a common preoccupation with un-knowledge. Our job is to commute un-knowledge into knowledge. Then, whether students or teachers, we have done our job. Dutiful acceptance of lack of intellectual status produces genii. Our scientific community; those puffed windbags that buster credentials whilst failing to fathom the simplest certainty, is the sad tribute to terminal memory manipulation. These people are junkies. Corporate pushers brazenly conspire with the mainstream educators doling out money and fame to the hapless addicts willing to destroy their brains for prosperity. The reason my memory failed was due to manipulative programming; the same programming spineless scientist propagandists willingly subject themselves to.

I have already mentioned the 1960’s was a critical awakening for humanity. Vietnam collapsed because for the first time ever, in hereditary memory, there was mass dereliction of duty. American troops were fighting a war and a percentage felt that they were the enemy. Whereas there was some sympathy for the plight of the Germans by some troops in the First and Second World Wars, because “they” look like “us”, it was not usually enough to dissuade “patriotic” duty. In fact, due to leadership incompetence, it is always the oppressed soldiers that carry the machine. In 1960 the people rebelled; in more ways than one. That changed the world and sent the old guard into a spin. 1971-75 saw a frantic effort to reassess globalisation elevating “young gun” “masterminds” like Rockefeller protégé, Zbigniew Brzezinski. The world needed a fresh perspective and that is what it got. Rockefeller had earlier (back in 1952) been behind the establishment of the Robertson Panel by the CIA, which promulgated into the reluctant cataloguing Project Blue Book which was designed to ridicule the vast majority of Unclassified Flying Object (UFO) sightings by censoring or routinely dismissing anything that could be reported effectively. In conjunction, Eisenhower (the president that lied about the Holocaust to relaunch Israel) established a special body to study phenomena. This is euphemistically known as the Majestic-12, as that was the code name. It consisted of twelve famous scientists (that presumably were not propagandists). To underscore Rockefeller’s power, he allegedly has inherited Tesla’s famous “death ray” that could freeze entire armies or population bodies.

Therefore it is no surprise, to me, that Rockefeller, via the auspices of the Trilateral Commission, dictated globalisation policy from 1973. The ultimate plan is to have global federalism overseen by one administrative body (which is currently, theoretically, split by the United Nations and Israel). For globalisation to be effective there can be only one currency and that would ideally be electronic, per that mindset. According to Jon Rappoport, a TC insider came clean via the mainstream media in 1978. President Jimmy Carter, at the time, did not construct foreign policy. They did. 1979 saw the erection of the Georgia guide stones, dictating the way it was going to be (from the globalist’s perspective). 1975 predictably heralded the official end of the Vietnam War (although fighting continued) as a new 25 year plan had been drafted. 1977 brandished the discovery of a new mysterious virus in Africa that killed just about everything in its wake. This was the Ebola virus and that is how I remember it – from young teen TV recollections. It kills 95% in a few days. They said. I remember a thin built balding guy praising the doctors that saved him. He was one of the ones that pulled through. They said it was like Tuberculosis on steroids, turning blood black and disintegrating organs. We all believed it. It was over there. We were safe.

Ebola was hardly a distant memory when HIV/AIDS sprung up. I think the year of “discovery” (as we know, like Ebola nothing has actually been discovered – only ‘effects’ of carnage) was 1983 and it quickly became the Gay Plague backed by an incessant global anti-sex, anti-promiscuity propaganda campaign. This saw such an acceptance of prophylactics, encouraged by the sex industries, $billion condom sales followed with specialist stores springing up. It was also a subtle attack on Rosicrucian order (Catholicism). AZT was so successful in converting HIV (if it exists) into AIDS; in 1988 the Council of Rome (another masonic “policy forum”) decided it would be a great idea to manufacture poison vaccines to kill off tracts of the population “as and when necessary”. A separate front was managed by the Freudian (materialistic) American Psychiatric Association reclassifying the prior behavioural classification, “Post Encephalitic Behavioural Disorder” twice. The first change, “Attention Deficit Disorder” (ADD), happened in 1980. This was amended to “Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder” in 1987. Agreed some additional “symptoms” (behaviour traits) were added, but why change the name? The reason was “marketing”. It made bipolar disorder easier to “sell”. Bipolar disorder was created in 1980 and is the means that Special Operatives use to select clandestine recruits for special operations like the Foot Hood attack. A little hint to those suffering from memory manipulation; theoretically everyone is bipolar.

I would like to conclude this post by returning to the theme of Jesus. A few readers of The Truth about Jesus will have chanted “he’s got no evidence” under the breath trying to drown out any rational thought that might hinder memory manipulation. I am forever amazed that billions of human beings sincerely believe utter nonsense because either laziness, preconditioning or general ignorance forbids them to be anything less than willing recruits of propaganda. The fact, in this case, that Jesus manufactured his own myths is all the more sweet. It is my sincere opinion that every “fact” about Jesus’ natural (non-ministerial) life was in fact about his father’s natural life. But now is time to provide more background. The Truth about Jesus only took readers part of the way.

My earlier comment about Rosicrucian order and the Catholic Church may have taken a few by surprise. The reason the earliest traceable edition of Fama Fraternitatis, the original Rosicrucian manifesto, first appeared in 1614 is prior to that the Tudors (British Royal House) were the embodiment of order. Henry VIII’s divorce of Catherine of Aragon was more than it seemed. His preoccupation with a son and heir was merely a smoke screen (although it does also highlight the preoccupation with control through bloodlines). The trouble is rather than reinstating the Celtic, Druidic systems of paganism (a pantheism hybrid), he chose Zion. This Zion was a form of atheism as Henry was renowned for plundering churches. We know from his sixth wife, Catherine Parr, whose writings attempt to make peace with God, that the king was not a spiritual man. His daughter, the iron queen, “Elizabeth I” does have a connection with the Priory of Sion (a variation of Zionism) through her illegitimate son, Francis Bacon (who Maree Moore argues was also the infamous Comte de Saint Germain). Though the, then, objectives of the Priory of Sion were radically different to today’s “Zionism”, it was a step on the path to what we call “now”.

Turning the clock back 1500 years, I am compelled to agree with Maree Moore’s speculation that the Culdee (Celtic Jew), Joseph of Arimathea, was located at Glastonbury for the year we call 37AD. Though I know of no other writings supporting the fact, I am also compelled to believe that Joseph saved Jesus’ (Josephus’) father, Matthias, by intervening in either 30AD or 32AD. The out of place description of Jesus attacking the money changers (Matthew 21:12-13) has been blamed on Barabbas. Various candidates have been submitted, including two of the brothers of Jesus. However, I say Barabbas was the codename of Matthias and Matthew’s account did not belong (as a history of Jesus/Josephus). There is a record of a minor agitator in the Roman annuls. I believe this was Matthias. The seriousness of the charges would have been lessened as, in my opinion; Matthias may have been in his 20’s at the time. Whereas the Jews saw a coming of age at 30, for the Romans it was 25. It was possible he was actually slightly older (perhaps 26-28), but an exaggeration could have been made in his favour to apply relative leniency. This calculates the birth of Matthias at around 4AD. However, Luke wrote of pregnant Mary’s (mother of Jesus) need to attend the Roman census of Quirinius of 6AD. Although in this case Matthias’ mother has been substituted by “virgin” Mary, it would place him at 24-26 in 30-32AD.

Whereas I am aware that more than one expert on Roman history (and law) has stated that Jesus did nothing to warrant his supposed crucifixion, I believe there was an event. Using my imagination, I could well see one of the money changers’ attempting to defend his property killed in the process. There is our reason. In the meantime, the Romans invaded Britain in 43AD. This was after a number of plans to invade had been thwarted from around 55BC onwards. Diplomacy had worked and the Romans had been receiving tribute from Britain for many years. The reason the Romans invaded was to impose money on the Celts as the first step of planned globalisation, which involved standardised taxation across the federation. Nevertheless, the Celts did not buy money and it took the Magna Carta of 1215 to finally break their will and usher in the age of feudalism. New order began in 1493. Few are aware, but between 55BC and 43AD, Britain was the jewel of Europe (and not some barbarian backwater). Reputedly there were upwards of eighty mystery schools and colleges of the special arts. Britain was a popular education destination for the then families of rich and famous.

The Emperors Caligula and Nero both receive a mention in The Truth about Jesus. I did not mention that Britain, translated from Hebrew, means “Covenant Man” or the “People of the Covenant”. Therefore, Britain is the Land of the Covenant. Israelite links with Ireland stretch back prior to 500BC with the Prophet Jeremiah visiting on a number of occasions. As Britain was the Land of the Covenant, the fact must have been recognised long prior to 37AD (with relics, such as the Stone of Destiny, in situ). Indeed royal lineages may have all had blood ties to Israel (though the current Queen of England is arguably an imposter that has never been crowned – formally). We learnt that Emperor Nero was all in all a beastly character, but there is something odd about him. Historically, he becomes Emperor in 54AD and allegedly commits acts of overt homosexuality on his victory parade. Reputedly, he also had sex with his own mother, Agrippina at some point or, perhaps, many points. I am frankly compelled to assume more than a degree of salacious artistic license has been devoted to that negative portrayal. If Nero did behave that way, it would certainly have very much been behind closed doors. It also suggests that the writers of “history” may have been recruited and funded by overseers of Orders “anti-Rome” who, just as today, would have lied when necessary. I believe neither Nero nor Caligula were “perverts” of any note (more so than the “journalists” of the time). Instead we are witnessing mischievous word crafting to manipulate the memory.

The Roman invasion of Britain in 43AD was a relatively quiet affair, but it was only after Nero’s ascension, the trouble started. According to Tacitus, there was wanton slaughter of Druids on Mona (Anglesea) by the troops of Gaius Seutonius Paulinus either 60 or 61AD. This was met with a short lived rebellion from the Welsh Queen, Boudica (or Boudicca), crushed by 62AD (Battle of Watling Street, possibly somewhere in Shropshire) to the overwhelming approval of Nero. Let us think back and remember the “special relationship” Joseph of Arimathea had with the Welsh Druids for his tin mining export operation. Surely he was not the only Culdee with a base on the Land of the Covenant? “Austere measures” by Nero led to the Jerusalem rebellion for the Passover 66AD. In that precise same year Nero expelled all Philosophers and Gnostics from Rome. One, Appollonius, had previously seen a vision of the temple of Rome in flames and had been charged with high treason (as he was seen as a “planner” or in some way linked to Gnostic terrorists). According to “history”, in his final act of madness, Historically, Nero burnt Rome to the ground in 64AD. Yet this was logically a terrorist attack managed by the same front that wrote “history” (like today’s 9/11). History states he committed suicide in 68AD in the noteworthy style fitting this charade but, equally credibly, he merely rescinded power by disappearing to the safety of anonymity (as did Jesus). Hints in the writings of Tacitus suggest he was a true socialist that was hated by the oligarchy of all persuasions. Though he is “historically” remembered as an immoral, perverse clown renowned for conspiring with poisonous alchemists, for me he shines as one who took on the system exiting with refined dignity when the time was right (reading between the lines). Given the reputation of our very own Shimon Peres, poison is found both in the blood and pens of our Pharisee masters. Continuing, interestingly, the Flavian dynasty succeeded power in 69AD (December).

Emperor Vespasian was a blood relative of Josephus (whose ministry as Jesus ended with the ascension [of Vespasian], “coincidentally”) and, therefore, must have been an ally of the Gnostics. Troubles in Jerusalem predictably evaporated. I am sceptical as to whether the orthodox “historic” account of Jerusalem’s demise in 70AD has any credence other than it highlights the Sanhedrin was definitely abolished never to return. Why was the Sanhedrin abandoned, in truth? Was it because globalisation was complete and power had already been transferred to Rome? The “destruction of Jerusalem” may have been code confirming the removal of elements that had previously obstructed the progress of the Essene/Roman union. Those obstructive “elements”, ironically, are likely the ones that now occupy the power vacuum that exists today. Much has happened since Roman times. Either way, my detestation of the vain, unfair laws created and sold on the back of exaggerated, biased and flawed logic have always been a blessing to the elite. For it is they that are welcome to murder, kidnap and rape. This is not to say the elite, broadly speaking, behave barbarically as that is risky (particularly for those that fall out of favour), but there are some that are notably above the law. When reason, true logic and fairness are applied, everyone should be above the law. Pharisaic order oppresses because it can. James the Just (brother of Josephus) became a casualty of the battle between old (a variation of current Catholic) and new Gnostic order. He was left to tend the roost (now called the first Bishop of Jerusalem) and was stoned to death by the Pharisees in 69AD, just before Roman retribution. The current Israelite establishment (hereditary Pharisees) refuse to recognise James’ bone box even though it is authentic. That is their level of hatred. Does anyone wonder what the connection is with radical Islam and our modern hereditary Pharisaic order?

“He who shall cast the first stone….”

I am thinking of adding a “tip jar”, not to “go commercial” (god forbid!) but, being one of the slaves, an income stream would allow more time to be devoted to this pastime such as editing (sic). Feedback is welcome; positive or negative.