Public Bewilderment Over Political Misdirection Embedded in the Coronavirus/Cornholio Sickness “Psy-op” Finally Exposed

People are generally comfortable with their own “world view”, whether motivation comprises clarification of revised truth or responding visualisations should be regarded as securely maligned by others. I have also observed, when not entirely absent, invariably very little academic diligence frames casual beliefs. This laziness towards intellectual proficiency is predominantly why the greatest popularly feared threats reference deadly plagues of unknown gestations. Perhaps explaining premises behind industrial medicine adopting idiopathic principles, neither is science opinion necessarily uniformly correct on matters that accord sound properties of existence. Indeed, many once certain facts have subsequently been disproven under redirected experimentation protocols. Dr. Rupert Sheldrake has cited no less than ten miracles (beyond science-explanation) from authoritative astrophysics theoretical outpourings pertaining to analysis of the genial hubris of our universe. Primary conclusions of my initial published musings over Coronavirus (an “alien bug”) were quite definite though. Putting all other considerations to one side, shabby politics overlaying crisis management provide basis for an indisputable “psy-op” of universal proportions. Notably, attributed global quarantine sanctions are, according to my research, the first of their kind.

Thus, my initial attempts at coming to terms with associated complexities percolated a mammoth fifteen thousand words. These were aimed at demystifying “all angles”, or so I thought at the time. “First HIV, then Ebollox, now Simpsons’ Coronavirus, What Next?” (the finished product) can be referenced here by the way. I have found unraveled raw truth is always far simpler than anything laborious brainpower might concoct. Over thinking assured my opening paragraphs (well, I did pay tribute to Einstein) casually overlooked streetwise obvious occult cryptic messaging (belying Coronavirus). In summary, critical observations determined specific use of corona (“crown” from Latin coronius) implied a connection with our sun (Latin solos). Corresponding expression corona effect is widely used and particularly prominent at times of eclipse (to which ancient peoples are believed to have interpreted as doomsday). Conjunctive investigation established a more define link because, according to news items I witnessed (albeit of spurious origins), the term Coronavirus had actually been invented by scientists back in 1918 as their precursor to claims that the sun was believed cause of new, erstwhile unknown ailments. Occurrence strangely coincided with that sensational Spanish Influenza epidemic, but I’ll have more details later. My reasons for introducing Einstein were straightforward enough. His notorious E = MCᶻ equation pertains to a universe entirely constructed from energy. So, thinking of how this knowledge might apply to corona effect, it seems the expression whittles down the sun to its bare rays, which happen to provide all our local power that isn’t synthetically cultivated.

Decades after initial 1918 discovery, fringe academia observed a definite relationship with construction of Europe’s virgin energy grid (circa 1918-25). Recent figures coming from the US have established the most likely cause of COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019) are new, related infrastructures. Given established precedence, it is fair to say occultists love staging partnered incidence over hundred year cycles. What a coincidence (not) that Coronavirus 1918 reemerges a century later almost to the day in 2019. Of course, one of the unexpected key players involved with current charades is none other than computer man Bill Gates. I say unexpected but, with hindsight, without oomph driven from “computer generated modelling” supplied by a prominent UK politician, there would be no Coronavirus pandemic. After UK (in particular) figures didn’t “go to plan” the fellow ungraciously resigned, but his toxic legacy remains stronger than ever. Bill Gates isn’t solely implicated via technology. His father is or was a passionate eugenics supporter. Corresponding information should not be taken lightly because it adds greater weight as to “why” Bill Gates is specifically involved with this elaborate hoax.

Background framing my introduction to politics behind Coronovirus cited a shady US non-government organization called Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which is a privately owned collaboration of various members of that motley Federal Reserve style “Globalist” pharmaceutical cartel. As an insider watchdog it has proved about as reliable as an ex-con in control of a bank. Julie Gerberding, who Wikipedia ominously lists as an infectious diseases expert (revamping Pasteur’s recanted, flawed and failed “germ theory”) oversaw [what many professionals argue is] a fraudulent vaccine safety report while President of the CDC shortly before taking an executive role at Merck Vaccines. But that wasn’t end game. Merck produced at least one of the offending vaccine compounds (MMR) and has also been embroiled in fraud allegations connected to employed scientist William W. Thompson. Thompson has since admitted to providing false information (per Merck’s instruction) that denied findings favouring a definite vaccine/autism link in African-Americans.

In conjunction with the World Health Organisation (WHO), Centres of Disease Control have been prominent agitators pushing every “epidemic” in living memory. Rabid cries (amplified by WHO) have been heard around all four corners of the globe, regardless of lack of severity. My prior article exampled the Swine Flu fiasco but, for Coronavirus, the CDC has teamed up with safe bet Bill Gates, who, remarkably, is neither medical expert nor professional. Yet that hasn’t stopped them. Gates ran a computer company with an early reputation for pinching collaborator’s ideas and other forms of sharp practice. Because of his privileged upbringing, the shadow government eventually felt he was stable enough to own the company that was booked in to rule the global software market. Anyway, after leaving Microsoft with enough cash to sink a battleship, he poured his heart into a tax dodge, sorry, I mean, foundation that focused on healthcare (apparently a passion of his wife, co-founder). Medias’ spared no effort in (deceptively) promoting a “generous” gift of “$5 billion worth” of polio vaccines to “the peoples of India”. Forerunner of the sugar cube, vaccines he offloaded were actually tainted, dumped stock which had been rejected by the west (because of reports of a litany of dreadful side effects) long ago, but more on that later.

Even so, Gates’ “philanthropy” spring boarded his medical career. Such was the momentum, Warren Buffet (prior to his catching cancer) and a few prominent others sensationally played the tweedle dum tweedle dee “big note” investment act for a while. Well, that was until the press lost interest. We should have all received the message loud and clear. Mega money was backing healthcare and you don’t mess with mega-money. Personally I have been a regular subscriber to efficient reporting journalistic icon Jon Rappoport’s various blogs for many moons. In my last article I gave his outstanding book “AIDS Inc.” a weighty plug, not for commercial reasons, but because what he wrote twenty years ago is as current as ever today. Then, those behind the seasonal HIV scam were apparently doing cartwheels over amounts of money to be made from healthcare. Worse still, according to Dr. Judy Mikovits (whose career was ruined by HIV), the same key guys have critical roles to play supplying the current and very much “in our faces” Coroonavirus psy-op. Stakes for humanity were high last time round because, as Jon disturbingly points out in AIDS Inc., in deference to HIV, AZT (the billed “cure”) was cause of AIDS. Unconscionably, effects of that tragic “medication” had been long known, neatly tying in with fevered Globalist eugenics goals.

Bill Gates’ father we know is or was fond of the idea of indiscriminately killing people off (other than friends and family). Therefore, I don’t find the notion of son spearheading a medical attack on useless eaters at all incredible. Far from it. I actually feel it is an essential political consideration, given that chilling United Nations’ “we must reduce [global] populations by any means” very public statement not so long ago. In fact, the UN went a step further to aid interpretation of the directive. “War, contraception and other birth control measures (according to experts) had not succeeded in meeting objectives,” they said. Still, Gates in the role as technology man is the more pertinent focus justifying a final conclusions bombshell that wrapped up last article. Incidentally, findings included an embedded (notorious) forbidden doctor telecast, reinforcing opinions to the hilt. Corresponding bombshell was Coronavirus (according to US statistical data collected after the Gates’ contagion model was scrapped) is evidently [at least partially] caused by the recently constructed 5G network. Of course lugubrious critics’ appeals against this information will cite plenty of virus infected locations where 5G isn’t present. New Zealand and Iran are two examples, but there are many others.

In effect, the 5G network is merely referenced from varied extraneous technologies, technologies that commonly generate energy. Again, certain past high profile fringe scholars do provide compelling background in support of the belief that construction of the virgin electricity grid was the root cause of killer Spanish Flu (colloquial name for Coronavirus lest we forget) from 1918 onwards. Though modern day networks are wireless, ideology is identical. In line, alternative medias reached fever pitch over health impact concerns attached to “smart meters” (which provide two way wireless communications) prior to the introduction of 5G. The key, common dominator, call it what you will is electromagnetic pollution, which is a known issue that has been tackled by government agencies for decades. No surprise numerous Google web scrapes found none attached to current virus propaganda. On a side note, Google appears to have also censored out opinions alternative to the mainstream on the current “crisis”. I have been informed cornholio sickness should yield significant results for those keen on discovering anti-sentiment. Anyway, commonly the phrase “lesser of two evils” is used in agency electromagnetism analysis reports. Identical to philosophies allowing cars that kill people to continue unhindered on roads, it is deemed over reaching technological advancement trumps preservation of human life. Talking of roads, a positive consequence of the Coronavirus campaign is Australian researchers have been forced to come clean on what really rots the ozone layer (and I assure you fridge gas has little to no impact). Because relatively few petrol fume emitting motor vehicles have been in circulation under quarantine conditions, skies have “inexplicably” begun self-repairing. Erk! So, substantively, energy is why Mr. Technology Bill Gates is the friendly scheming face of new HIV.

Thus, reflective considerations as to the real reasons behind Gates’ apparently philanthropic act towards India beg to be aired. Embroiled old vaccine stock, we already know, the west couldn’t give away and, to a degree, I see karmic retribution at play with the full story. Aptly, the planners’ disease cultivating master stroke well and truly backfired. Alternative Medias have been quick to promote the carnage at every waking opportunity ever since. Reflectively, there is an alleged international class action against Gates driven by vaccine victims who were damaged by his gift. According to salt of the earth sources unattached to polluted mainstream engines, a weighty chunk of peoples “caught polio” from Gates’ donation. It is no wonder I have found not a skerrick of coverage in potential mainstream outpourings. Bereft of screams of denial or further affectionate promotion, “old guard” persistent silence on matters more or less affirms the gravy train went off track. Look how they’ve been milking “COVID” at every waking opportunity. Silence additionally implies infecting Indian hill tribes with polio was not the objective agenda, so what was the original mission?

To answer this effectively, we need to return to the eugenics’ movement and that paranoid United Nations pledge. Doing the math’s, from the globalist perspective, it appears one of the greatest offenders against unauthorized reproduction is India. In particular, the hill tribes people, who’ve always traditionally sponsored large families to offset child mortality. However, courtesy of internationally improved infant death occurrences, regional population booms have been so rapid, they’ve catapulted India to rank one (overtaking China by two hundred million) in the world. That’s the “why India?” part of the puzzle solved. My previous article on Coronavirus referenced a television documentary that sensationally presented authorities coming clean on true details surrounding the emergence of HIV. Original promotional depiction of a prehistoric viral evolution that sprung up from some forgotten African watering hole was a giant lie. Predictably, it turns out causes were accidental again. Polio vaccine serums, the television documentary informed its viewers, had been cultivated in live kidneys of chimpanzees and green monkeys (hence adaptable prior science myths). Apes transferred a natural virus (collected from local pollution intake). Though serums accumulated only the slightest of trace elements, it was enough to set off mutation cycles, resulting as HIV diagnosis in humans.

Smiling angel of death Gates was billed as a deliverer of evil. The most brainless moron should be able to discern the powers’ caper here. Though alternative Medias only have damning words to say about HIV and a few, that have read Jon Rappoport’s Aids Inc., casually identify mitigated medical genocide, mainstreamers simply went mute once the campaign petered out. That dynamic could change in a heartbeat, of course. Following the African Ebola resurgence warm up, was the primary strategy to synthesise another “major HIV outbreak” in India, an ideal “population busting” target? Last article I theorized it was unlikely AZT would be offered as “cure” again (given its onerous history), but there is a litany of other really nasty, cancer generating drugs that were efficiently tested on American troops sent to Iraq, so in terms of “means” our UN commissioned psychopaths are spoilt for choice. Let’s face it, the same sorry hacks, Anthony Fauci (once great buddy of Bernie Madoff), Luc Montegnier et al have been placed on ice for decades (or why would they be centrally involved with Coronavirus?), so resurgence of HIV must have been the ideal scenario.

Montegnier, of course, has moved onto bigger and better things. After not spontaneously generating life with contaminated laboratory equipment, a man of his esteemed character has no scruples against openly thieving the extraordinary water memory work of Dr. Masaru Emoto. Coronavirus isn’t even vaguely related to HIV, so, in some ways, the sheer audacity of the caper surprises me. Coronavirus is almost certainly caused by large technological infrastructures, such as wireless internet towers. Indeed, the complaint itself would be harmless enough (more on that later), like HIV, but a hostile political agenda determines otherwise. I mentioned earlier that the word Corona stems from Latin coronius, which means “crown”. The sun’s crown or corona effect delivers Earth’s energy, but there is something else. Beyond the sun’s range as darkness falls, combating absence, man has been compelled to turn to cultivation of varied engineered synthetic light channels. One such is that virgin electricity grid, exposed as cause of “1918 Coronavirus”. Nevertheless, if a responsible finger was to wield identification of an “overall” culprit, my guarded suspicions would surely be confirmed. Large technology infrastructures are a recognised problem: so why not “the” problem? To be honest, considering Zionist determinism (check out those Israeli tech stocks) towards processing the entire planet as a cozy “global village” means infrastructures will never expand fast enough to keep pace with optimal zealous connectivity requirements.

In terms of testing methods employed to ascertain illness, I can only refer to Australian procedures. Here the process is two pronged (I’m led to believe). First “practitioners” (same as lawyers and accountants, but I felt Islamic fundamentalists made a clearer analogy in my prior essay) ram a coarse cotton bud up the nose, which, when not violently rupturing blood vessels, guarantees a patient’s wince. Though I doubt the medical people do anything more than following orders, the reason this is actioned is to capture external pollution collected in the nasal cavities (ironically a body’s first line of defense against malady). One must presume everyone has a bit of technology age electromagnetism up there. Australian initial test batches weren’t that stringent, so very few were wedeled out as nose bud “positive”. Step two comprised of collecting blood samples which were sent “somewhere” to be scanned, something sinister governing authorities very much relied on as best means for delivering the goods. Active patients I interviewed had waited “weeks” for results of what they were told was an “antibody test” (I highlight in my first article authorities have never actually isolated a “virus” and are forced to review biological carnage). After the fact we now know, beyond a few Media stalked geriatrics perspiring on queue and awkward false positives, goods were not delivered which rendered the Australian campaign almost (emphasized) a write off (as a monumental flop).

Until I received “news” of outbreaks in the United Kingdom’s Cornwall region and other supposed “hot spots”, symptoms of the complaint were unknown to me. Even so information presented by the mainstream is so indistinct it can “read between the lines” in many directions. What is clear is air, via the nose, travels directly to the lungs without passing “go”, consequently patients with severe sufferance have been filmed placed on respirators, which should hardly surprise. It’s funny, because when I first looked into Coronavirus, I noticed how similar the branding was to “coronary”. Of course, coronary (crown formation of blood arteries) heart attacks also regularly restrict patients to respirators, normally when in association with pulmonary disease. Even funnier, beyond being hit by car, shot in the hood or slipping over in the shower, pulmonary disease used to be the number one natural fatality cause in the first world. Courtesy of a freedom of speech network, I have been privileged by the opportunity to scrutinise real medical reports of supposed Cornavirus positives. Statements were cordially collected from different parts of the world. In each case I inspected, I could not distinguish how Coronavirus symptoms were any different from that of your everyday heart attack, but I guess that must be because I’m no doctoring “doctor”.

At the time of writing, here in Australia, there was a sporadic resurgence of positive viral identifications in Victoria state (presently barely functioning under strain of soft Martial Law enforcing a one-hundred-and-eighty-degree reversal on “safety” of masks) out of the blue (shortly after the federal government was almost ready to pack up and go home). A “breakdown” of bureaucracy ensured some “infected” people were conveniently allowed to travel to NSW state for mass Medias. I say conveniently because they “obviously” (and we were told how things work in that cheesy Ebola movie starring Dustin Hoffman) “passed the disease” (“affirming” flawed germ theory) to various patrons of a public house (which has subsequently closed) a few miles away from the airport landing zone. One young male Victorian traveler has since died allegedly. Before I expose childish Australian political misdirection in conjunction with this, I would like to refer to my last report again to shed some additional background light. Phenomena are not limited to my shores. An observant American Facebook compatriot remarked that if the petulant (taking instructions from Denver?) were instructed to remove their stupid masks, everything would be freaking (he used a different word, from memory) normal. Everything is albeit normal.

Back in the day, when HIV was a current concern, towards the end of the panic lifecycle, occasional intriguing articles appeared in mainstream newspapers. In conjunction, it seems, courtesy of lucrative International Monetary Fund underwritten grants, doctors of “third world” countries had been encouraged to behave dishonestly. “AIDS” deaths in Thailand, by example, were inexplicably “rife”. My wife’s ex. husband (in his ‘70’s), according to provincial practitioners, died of AIDS. The reality was at par with their “truth”. He had actually succumbed to what is usually branded “old age” and, in absence of known causes (staple of idiopathic principle), “AIDS” was casually remarked on the death certificate for prosperity. Now we know that HIV was caused by an abominable polio vaccine, the likes of which Bill Gates gave away to Indian hill tribes people. Historically, prior to (and just after) academia’s raucous alarms against its major side effects corrupting privileged peoples, product was deemed good to go to backwaters, such as Africa. Rhodesia’s heady days under De Boers had drifted into the quagmire post Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe takeover. With hindsight, populations were sufficiently prepped to take anything anyone was giving away for nothing.

Outcomes justified statisticians’ predictable data that revealed roughly 45% had been inoculated and the same number were estimated HIV positive. This explains why eyes of the world (or, rather, pariah Medias) focused on Africa in particular at that time. We may enjoy criticizing statisticians (after Benjamin Disraeli’s notorious remark), but they also provide fodder for fanfare which ultimately prophesised demise of the HIV campaign. Sufferers yielded very low percentages with developmental “AIDS” symptoms and, after AZT was delisted, as far as I can ascertain new [AIDS] figures actually bottomed down to zero. In fact, at least one individual given a “bad” blood transfusion tested HIV negative, so all the way through the campaign there was a degree of genuine ambiguity as to how “infection” was transmitted. What we know for certain is that evidence was manipulated and distorted out of proportion to satisfy commercial, political interests. Consequentially, considerable numbers of doctors were happy to falsify under Hippocratic Oath. Now, from the HIV campaign perspective (remembering Jon Rappoport concluded it was “cooked” from onset in AIDS Inc.), the major error was planners had relied too heavily on epidemic fear inertia emanating from the third world radically contaminating minds of civilization.

Though varied ignorance superimposed routines applied to regulation control over spread of presumed contamination; “western” medics were inscrutably honest. Practitioners actually listened to their patients and were (generally) in the business of healing rather than enlisting mindless, blind protocols issued by agenda driven authorities. In consideration, if the motley crew behind HIV were going to reenlist resources, their next attempt would need cast iron verification. They would need lots of associated illnesses and, perhaps vitally, illnesses that would commonly prove fatal. Then people would sit up and listen. Doctors would likewise be forced to join the bandwagon or sink. With that philosophy in mind, isn’t today’s Coronavirus/coronary combination the perfect partnership for deceitful schemers? Unsurprisingly virus positive fatalities have haunted the elderly because that is where the predominance of deaths can be garnered. For Australia, agoraphobia is such old age pensioners “of means” refuse to leave their dwellings, which has prompted mini-booms in the courier industry.

Were schemers to be successful second time round, enlisted support of hysterically disoriented and suitably naïve medical “professionals” must be viewed as a prerequisite. In this regard, it seems odd that Australian private hospitals would turn away incomers with smokers’ cough “in case” they were COVID infected, yet I have received reports that affirm this lack of professionalism. Though public hospitals could be censured for employing typically “programmed” thoughtless nurses, steps are at least in place to serve all incomers desirous of ascertaining good health status. I outlined what’s involved with the testing process earlier. When cotton bud rammed up the nose doesn’t produce prompt results, blood samples are ritually dispatched to an unspecified location. I emphasized if the cotton bud application is to be regarded as pertinent, it confirms cause of illness is definitely fault of pollution. Data emerging from the US adds almost undeniable weight to considerations that determine overall culprit is electromagnetic pollution. Late into my investigation, I have been privileged to interview an American nurse, who implies testing protocols are universal. In her case a hard plastic implement was used to (medics informed her) “collect a DNA sample”. It was inserted very deep (just stopping before the membrane that covers the “third eye”) and “twisted” several times. Results proved positive, but she wasn’t sick, so authorities ammended diagnosis to “false positive“. A “burning sensation” about her third eye lingered for a prolonged period following the ordeal.

Details emerging from Australia’s correlating saga assure deliberate political misdirection. We were all about to pack up and go home here when, out of the blue, vicious outbreaks erupted in Victoria state. Consequentially authorities advised neighbouring New South Wales residents to be retested. Nevertheless, no mitigated plausibility backing philosophy in favour of retesting has been forthcoming (similar to that grubby unsafe masks about turn).  Flawed logic here aptly matches determination that inoculated are not protected against the unvaccinated. So the obvious related $64 question is “was retesting identically benchmarked to first run standards?”. Last essay’s sarcastic highlight of those sensational positive test results for British dignitaries Boris Johnson and Prince Charles might provide insight. Let’s think about this more carefully. Given their social status, you would have thought higher ups’ screenings would have been as stringent as possible just to be on the safe side. Normal people, one would assume, would only need alarms raised in the possible likelihood of serious illness progressing. Credibly, you would have thought medical communities would primarily surely want to ward off unhelpful panic as much as possible, particularly in light of mendacious Media trumpeted cart before horse pandemic hysteria from day one. A very important secondly, we have the issue of resources. How long does it take to test and process a “patient” end to end? Fifteen minutes, an hour?  Multiply that by seven billion and that’s everyone done. Every minute shaved saves one hundred and sixteen million, six hundred and sixty-seven thousand hours give or take. To put this in different terms, to process everyone around the globe, based on fifteen minutes per patient, would require more than seven two million (twenty-four hour) days allocated to the task. It is lucky governments have deep pockets, or are they that deep?

Anyway, returning to the Victorian virus outbreak, we learned several locals were inexplicably allowed to fly to New South Wales unhindered. The hunt for estranged time bombs took authorities to an inn located in south west Sydney. When found, renegades apparently quickly gave themselves up. Other local inhabitants were tested (some retested) which netted a weighty positives haul. Subsequently queues of worriers stretching the best part of a kilometer ambushed a mobile testing station specifically set up post Melbourne breach. Well that was until local police, eager to push on with their weekly booze/drug motorists’ bust, shut the whole thing down. While “in circulation” the mobile station allegedly had refused to test “healthy” people. Of course bureaucracy may have been sanctioned under pressure to process the sheer weight of numbers but, equally, are latent problems potentially any less serious than active ones? What I’m saying is occurrences might motivate the sceptic into considering the possibility of political foul play here. If “sick only” were tested sceptics might rightly argue statistics have been loaded to “prove” Coronavirus was “genuine” on the back of other, different ailments. Additionally, in their desperation to bolster much needed epidemic affirming figures, have authorities implemented far more stringent testing parameters that perhaps give zombie queued Australians right royal treatment? It would explain why New South Wales residents “needed” to be retested.

This, in my opinion, represents but one tiny step of a wider political misdirection campaign, but we would do well never to lose sight of the fact the whole affair has been modelled on the 1990’s HIV/AIDS scam. There is no question Coronavirus misinformation has been bolstered by confusion. Significantly, there is general confusion as to what a virus “is”. Medical testing for pollution residue implies complaints are resultant respiratory diseases. In association, analysis is largely confirmed by UK reported chronic lung infections. Mentioned earlier, heart attack symptoms are so similar to Coronavirus effects; doctors appear to have become “disorientated” in their judgement of diagnoses. In that respect, the “new bug (not living virus “transformed” into living bacteria?) round” has been upgraded to the current popular “vaguely verified” object of blame of a range of illnesses, including black lung. Early medications issued in the US were standards for common flu, nevertheless, my own mother has a friend who happens to live in the UK’s Cornwall regions and, though some information is a repeat of prior feedback, this account deserves separate attention. Apparently the woman in question knows some of the Coronavirus afflicted personally. As would be expected, my mother is vital lady now cruising into her seventies (although she only ever admits to being “forty”). One of the syndromes attached to that age milestone is friends and associates are known to “drop off by the bucket load” courtesy of the grim reaper. Her Cornwall located colleague is of the same basic generation. Might those people she happens to know also be of a similar age bracket; an age bracket where illness and death becomes a stronger likelihood? In sober times, would her acquaintances have been mundanely classed as suffering coronary heart attacks under auspices of pulmonary disease?

So many questions and so few pertinent authority answers. Did that young Victorian Australian male that allegedly succumbed to Coronavirus have a congenital heart condition? Mainstream Media vultures who circled age care centres throughout the infant stages of publicity were sadly heartily rewarded. Whether a deliberate ploy or not, early outpourings certainly exacerbated public bewilderment and the tradition has maintained. Has no one noticed Coronary, commonest natural cause of death, just so happens to almost identically mimic end stages of Coronavirus symptoms progression? The paradox is mild viral symptoms that “burn out” eerily match common influenza form. Thailand’s first case was a seventy-one-year-old man who was successfully “treated” with standard flu medications. Then there are those statistics which show some people as apparently “immune” to the bug. Early alternative Medias reports that observed uncomfortable similarities between Covid-19 and common cold maladies pretty much affirmed sanity. Reminding ourselves again of the HIV/AIDS scam, associated fatal illnesses were fault of toxic medications (please do check Jon Rappoport’s AIDS Inc.). Statistics were synthetically manipulated by grubby third world practitioners who deliberately reassigned unknown death causes as “HIV/AIDS” on certification so their governments could cash in on lucrative IMF backed grants. Whilst no quarantine austerity had been imposed on the “west”, Medias did market HIV as a serious disease that backed off sexual promiscuity (progressing those Globalist eugenics goals). Whilst demand for face masks was null and void, condom sales did spike sufficiently to justify the erection of specialist “pop up” businesses in Australia’s major civilian centres.

Could we be witnessing a reversal of wolf in sheep’s clothing philosophy here? Associated ferocious fear mongering campaigns do come with nasty big teeth, but what are they covering up? Might Coronvirus be another of those furphies that mar mainstream accountability? Given time, will the virus itself prove as harmless as HIV and all we ended up fearing was fear itself? I mentioned earlier about the right royal treatment being dished out to Australians. What if authorities made testing even more stringent? Would everyone show up positive? Demonstrably, alternative Medias’ suspicions over the potential for medical genocide are rife. What they mean by their allegations is “world government” (voicing through its many ministerial agencies) could easily prep a phony epidemic simply in order to impose death inducing “medications” on Henry Kissinger’s useless eaters. Whereas the United Nations has affirmed theories to some degree by its horrifying public statement (to the effect) “as all other precautions (such as war, contraception) have failed, global populations “must” be reduced by any means”, a universal cull is unlikely. Doing the math’s last article, it turned out sheer volume of dead bodies (accrued over a relatively short period of time) could not be processed efficiently. If there was to be a medical attack, the only [other] option is attempted forced sterilization.

Given their punishing “study” (indoctrination?) schedules I have compared doctors to fanatical Islamic scholars before and, to be honest, I don’t feel the brainwashed medical folks have a handle on Coronavirus here. It’s always worrying when the blind lead the blind. However, of greater concern is how much bogus medical “science” authorizes corrupt commercial goals. Is William W. Thompson fraud at the behest of Merck Vaccines the tip of a monumental iceberg? Could that tie in with the 2000’s purge of registered microbiologists? You would have thought, ultimately, that corrupt microbiologists are the key to the awkward discovery (sic) of “Co-vi” in 2019. Then, all it took was a vigilant computer programmer and we had a “pandemic” bigger than Ben Hur on our hands, well before the first corpse had even been “identified”. I smell a giant rat. So, to wrap up, visionary truth beckons a tad more reinforcement from His Highness Bill Gates. My summary will hopefully finally expose what’s really going on here.

I am going to ignore those strange Facebook adverts seeking “community help” to collectively identify virus infected hot spots. Has medical authority been rendered completely impotent? How can unqualified “community members” identify who is COVID-19 infected or offer any valid feedback on the subject? Last essay, I noted that panic buying hype associated with fevered pandemic “warnings” presumed cart before horse ideology. Lack of supply, in many instances, was not through fault of madding hoards in flight but, rather, consequence of broken distribution chains. Whether breakdown was deliberately synthesized is up for debate. Many ideas that came to fruition in the HIV campaign were just as prophetic. Earlier, I brought up the technology connection as the primary reason why Bill Gates had been roped into current shenanigans. Instead, his foundation is the real key. We learned the planned “resurgence” of HIV had dramatically failed because no earthly propagandas could neutralize negativity attached to banality belying the epidemic of lameness resultant from those forlorn, dud polio vaccines gifted to Indian hill tribes. Alternative Medias boasts of a reactive international class action against Gates have pretty much petered out and the mainstream have offered nothing but silence on the matter (for my research).

In addition to science assessment on how to distinguish viruses from bacteria, for instance, last essay shed some light on immunisation philosophy. Vaccines were a symptom of industrialization. Justified by Pasteur’s (based on Rudolf Virchow’s preliminary research) germ theory, practitioners decided minor doses of a complaint would sufficiently bolster the body’s natural immune system to fend off attack. Whilst there are compelling arguments that expound false logic attached to germ theory, I shall let these slide for now. So, as far as I can ascertain, the Gates Foundation made a fortuitous connection Dr. Anthony Fauci (ex-HIV failure and current driving force behind Coronavirus) more than a decade ago. Resulting negotiations led to a sinister joint venture pact. Information about shady dealings only came to public light when the current “pandemic” was in full swing. There have been rumours abound over a massive conference Gates and “significant” others attended back in 2018, which apparently “planned contingencies around Coronavirus (before it was rediscovered)”. Other writings of mine have highlighted a supposed Council of Rome open public meeting in New York. Staged a year before Thimerosal was widely introduced to vaccines, attendees were surveyed on their opinions as to most effective strategies for global population reduction. Covert ISIS style medical poisoning drew significant attention.

I can but speculate whether Gauci was present at that fateful 2018 conference, but Coronavirus “solution”, formally untested Moderna vaccine, is the decade-in-motion result of his joint venture pact with the Gates Foundation. Notional use of an alien vaccine is so preposterous; clearly informal laboratory results should be construed as proven probably detrimental to wider propaganda goals. Last article I posited the consideration for associated microbiologists’ crookery, providing the example of researcher William W thompson’s sensational confession to deliberate sabotage of data that unquestionably discredited Merck Vaccines. In the last fifty years a glut of bad science has come to light. Most acute concentrations of deceit can be found in medical circles. Gates, a man that holds a reputation for sharp practice dealings, and Fauci, a mastermind of the HIV fiasco, are the epitome of decadence, but there is also a connected sideline player. Warmup man, Elon Musk, received a write up on my esoteric blog. Fine genuine journalist, Jon Rappoport, also raised concerns over Musk’s ramblings years ago. Then, of course, other than a few elites in the know, no one would have taken diatribe about a Brave New World genre human “automaton” seriously.

Though I did mention Musk’s interest in DNA at my other blog, it was more in reference to Earth governing, supposed extra-terrestrial, spiritual overlord hierarchies (ancients’ termed “Gods”). In association with NASA, at the time, his company SpaceX had recently launched a galactic shuttle called “dragon”. Those that study esotericism will quickly become nervous as dragons (perhaps Biblical “angels”) are primary custodians (owners) of our DNA intellectual property. I conduct occasional Skype sessions which review spiritual DNA heritage and other essential topics and, by chance, a client informed me that SpaceX had proudly assisted the 5G wireless effort by firing off five hundred rockets to join other satellites crammed into Earth’s upper atmosphere. We know now, of course, that electromagnetic pollution (a symptom of 5G) causes Coronavirus symptoms in the susceptible. In addition, Gates/Fauci moderna vaccine is periodically badged “Frankenstein jab” because it apparently alters a cell’s RNA (something that has never been formally done before), certainly enough to confirm Musk’s ramblings back in 2016 and prior were the warn up act.

Once again, my other musings on this subject did the math’s to consider the very real possibility of a globalist sanctioned “clandestine” human population cull. Potential accomplice, duplicitous United Nations, whilst pushing universal “wellness” (an agenda amply supported by bogus medical sciences), made a chilling instruction that world populations must reduce significantly at any price. Whereas I concluded a military operation may well have been considered, even psychopaths consumed by zeal could determine billions of untreated dead accumulated over short periods would bring on sufficient pestilence and genuine plague to kill off the remainder of humanity. It is unlikely that military barbarians would be able to distinguish mortuary workers from the rest. Even if that feat could be pulled off, current resources of furnaces and gravediggers, I calculated, are wildly insufficient to keep pace with processing requirements. Lime pits used in World Wars I and II don’t seem a very tenable interim option either. In fact, history teaches us many were left where they fell due to lack of accessible recovery infrastructure. Fields of “unknown graves” haunt Europe’s legacy.

Although authoritative use of failed chemo drug AZT as an HIV “cure” was mitigated murder, its dismal effect out in the field alienated patient and sincere medical practitioner alike. Thus, if a poison drug was to be offered as the “final solution” (after Hitler), it would need to be administered blitzkrieg style to avoid too many rejections of the “bait”. Arguably an early attempt at pioneering the “solution”, Thimerosal’s role in vaccines has dismally backfired. Resulting affliction “autism” (caused by light heavy metal contamination) has not disabled growth or reproduction capability sufficiently. Worse still, attributed ailments mock Globalism’s instructors’ utopian agenda. Thus, Pharisees (Pharaoh’s servants) will rue the day they commenced planning autism strategies. Affliction has beneficially provided sufferers sufficient stimulation of the so-called third eye to activate strange, intuitive abilities. Consequentially, if there was a pertinent case for a new “super human”, autism may well have inadvertently revealed hallmarks. Those with enough intuition can not only see through Globalism’s dastardly plans, but will have special resources to draw on to fight back.

Pot shots may be fired at traditional (establishment) enemy number one Aryan-Slavs but, beyond that, it is fairly safe to say an active medical cull of humanity is not going to materialize. Last article I determined the only possible wide ranging “solution” was a covert sterilization campaign. According to Wikipedia there are currently no known sterilization agents. In other words, castration can only be sanctioned via invasive operating procedures. Gates Foundation Moderna vaccine happens to alter cellular RNA, something critics (primarily Dr. Judy Mikovits) explain “has never been done before”. Healthy RNA dramatically affirms reproductive potential. Those with sickly RNA might incur baroness. Prior I had little information as to the homeopathic make up of so-called “bat gnosis” (serums apparently partially evolve from bat DNA), but logic still persuaded the only feasibly sincere option for radical population reduction was forced sterilization, whether by overt or covert means. China’s trialed draconian “one child” policy was a mitigated disaster from the corporate perspective. Families found ways to blossom, estranged from the stranglehold of pariah state.

Permanently disable the function of reproduction will deliver conclusive results. However, authorities have an associated problem. People talk. Word spreads with the wind and people pay attention, when it suits them. Numbers of dissenters in relation to Coronavirus have already escalated to epidemic proportions (and the sensational arrest of that pregnant Facebook woman will only enflame matters further) or why would Google need to impose a tyranny of internet censorship (as mentioned earlier, search for cornholio sickness to find topical anti-mainstream views)? There is no scenario (I could imagine) whereby a blitzkrieg medical attack could be unveiled effectively. Uniform sterilization is almost certainly going to be the chosen direction of one of the future program phases. Probability favours this primary phase, in part, will be dedicated to denying and disabling conspirators. Even so, menacing forces of evil are incapable of conceiving overall goodness, so I anticipate varied genetic makeups will prove susceptible to Moderna vaccine, whereas others won’t. Confused bewilderment will continue to reign affairs with no one knowing precisely who or what to heed. Indeed, I suspect some (in a similar vein to the autism syndrome) may be granted “indigo” powers which, perhaps, won’t gel easily with convention, but, when managed, will (theoretically, at least) furnish considerable advantage over others. The greatest unnatural accidental murderer, the automobile, inspires only hapless institutional ignorance. The same institution network uses Coronavirus to rule over the affairs of man, yet never reveals true causes so as not to interrupt technological advancement. Our “powers” would do wise to tread carefully from now onwards, because I do know this much. God, Gnosis, the spirit of endurance, call it what you will, can outgun obnoxious human agitators in a heartbeat. I will truly praise the day when divinity wipes the vain smirk off “holier than thou” Bill Gates’ face.

The “Powers’” Great Accolade – “Brand Pedo”

Imagine, if you will, there existed a world populated only by biological automatons that were solely allowed to survive at the behest of a vague commercial bureaucracy. Because of this uncertainty, imagine if none of these automatons realised they were abject properties of a brutal federal control program. If the slave masters, the “authorities”, decided they desired to stamp their immense power over will, to “once and for all” demonstrate their authority over the slave classes, could they outlaw or remove all fluid or solid sustenance resources without losing or graphically impairing their prized stock? Could they make the air unfit for consumption or destroy all known shelter to stress their despotic ambition? No, the only the true liberty they could possibly take away without permanently impairing labour is “unnecessarysexuality. That world does exist. It is planet Earth and the ignorant, naive biological automatons are human slaves; fodders dedicated for a system that deliberately transcends spiritual logic and reason in order to complete and maintain its program,

By corporate commercial determination, per “the program”, paedophilia is the root of all evil, and for reasons that so firmly contradict erudite populism, truth has become obsolete. The term paedophilia itself is nonsensical was it not for the fact that just about everyone has been radicalised into believing trappings of propaganda. So, going back to basics, it would be correct to start by analysing authentic etymology of terms in order to corroborate any coherent meanings. Only by careful analysis of the cold, dry facts can sound “basis” encapsulating the mainstreamers’ obtuse view be deciphered.

Paedophilia is a combination of two Greek words. One (paidos) means child and this is topically self-explanatory. The other, philos, calculates rather more problematic interpretation. Yes it translates to mean “love” as would be expected within the cognitive frame of child love. Nevertheless, the Greeks had three words (eros, agape and philos) to represent the emotion. Eros is used to convey an earthy erotic, sexual passion or lust. Agape is an emotional spiritual bond that perhaps might signify symptoms such as pity, togetherness or other deep soul connections (shall we say). Philos proposes a brave new world, one that is generally estranged from the Western concept of love. It is the Greeks’ “intellectual love” evocation and this might be best appraised as “to be on the same wavelength” (with others). Respect of a peer would make an acceptable version of the same concept.

Therefore paedophilia literally means “respect for children”, so how on earth did it translate into the ugly mess that has embraced the greatest of all modern day hysterias?

It seems likely (though I find no evidence of historic accountability) that the term was originally sponsored by those that formed special liaisons with children. It was a way of justifying engagements that might have otherwise been frowned upon by wider society. Promiscuity is a revelation of modern times, awoken by the 1960’s flower power sexual revolution. Prior to that lust outside marriage was a profound negative and “age restriction” on unions had been superficially imposed by religious authorities for so long that physical adult child pairings would have seemed unconscionable. This is not to say rules were not broken behind closed doors. Suffice to say, prior to the 1960’s suspicious borderline adult relationships would have had to have been considered lust free but always either plausibly “working towards marriage” or “undeniably platonic” for seemly social tolerance.

It was only after sexual revolution, political authority saw value in promoting homosexuality as a crass attempt to pervert all sexual relationships (i.e. by reversing principled traditionalism that defines sexual intercourse as a procreation precaution and not as a recreational tool, cultural insanity was born. Of course, this merely acts as a stepping stone towards outright control of the human mind – “you will behave as we say anytime we lecture you”). Thus those rabid synthesised outcries at phantom paedophilia are backed off strategized and scoped political support aimed at positively accelerating homosexual causes. “Contradictory” pederasty was most recently (1600’s onwards) adopted by the French (pederastie) from the Latin paederastia (Greek – paiderastia) and popularly translates to mean “lover of boys”.

Remarkable French piano prodigy and composer Camille Saint-Saens, a covert gay of the high Victorian period, once famously reported, “I am not a homosexual. I am a pederast”. This ironically demonstrates how much values have changed. Homosexuality was stigmatised because it was deeply hated (though undoubtedly egged on by political shit-stirrers) throughout cosmopolitan society and, therefore, illegal. Underage sex was not illegal, but because sex outside marriage was so universally chastised, “decent” normal folks would have found the practice unthinkable.

Even so Saint-Saens innocently reveals evidence of two streams of social conditioning. To admit to have been homosexual would have enraged retribution to beyond the pale so it was denied. Yet to confirm his overt but ambiguous paedophilia was the best way of diffusing allegations against him and shutting up critics. Of course there is much more to this tale (which circulated around his regular trips to Algeria – a place renowned for egregious sexual tolerance at the time). Saint-Saens cast himself as the paternal spirit ever excited by the ambitions of youthful innocent exuberance and not as a lecherous molester of children.

Ancient sexual roots of pederasty were neither explored nor acknowledged as relationships were symbolised as paternally platonic per the cultural view. However, the stem “erasty” is a version of erasthai (Latin) for which eros (Greek sexual love) is a derivative. This should emphasise the nonsense of modern times’ furore. If sex between adults and children was to be intimated by a slur, then pederasty is the ideal term. In fact, though it is believed to have originally been used to describe adult/minor homosexual trysts, the etymology is actually formally gender neutral. Does the “substitution” of paedophilia (in place of pederasty) not aptly highlight the wilful arrogance/ignorance of mainstreamers?

Many well founded information sources have come to light that broach the rather obvious homosexual connection to global control networks after Gary Allen’s tantalising volume “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” was published in 1972 (only a year before the Trilateral Commission was formed by late David Rockefeller). Those behind the eugenics movement aiming to radically reduce global populations have been implicated as players in the “program” many times. Whether this is true or not is open to debate, but philosophic motives are beyond argument.

If all population units were strictly homosexual, then procreation would require external management, perhaps offering theoretical provisos such as medical intervention to save humankind. Younger more fertile parents produce stronger offspring that live longer and this corroborates (though statistics are “contradictory”) a matched conspiracy. Paedophilia (younger, more fertile) has been outlawed whereas homosexuality (guaranteed infertile) is now both legal and encouraged (with initiatives such as sex change development offered to “asexual” [sic] children as young as four years old). Clearly all measures improve the ongoing population control/reduction agenda. I should add that whereas some institutionalised heterosexuals may argue they have a right to abolish repulsive homosexual practices, any [even justifiable] overt or covert despotism still prepares undeniable infringements against sovereign liberties.

Eugenics’ attack on the people has been unyielding. Wars used to be the preferred vehicle. Yet, as I write, the American “health system” (for instance) debatably shows up ten to a hundred times more effective at disposing of populations than war, depending on which statistics are favoured. Several drugs (including dozens of branded opiates) administered under the banner of “healthcare” are known to kill or impair life. The best reference is “auto-immune deficiency” so-called AIDS. Harmless retrovirus HIV was blamed for [known] effects caused by previously shelved (1950’s) chemo drug AZT. Naturally symptoms have been by no means limited to HIV “sufferers”. Timothy McVeigh’s foolhardy quest to bring down a building in Oklahoma City in 1995 was masterminded by the same powers he was attacking in defence of the “program”. They were behind the (at least) 50,000 AIDS related deaths of First Gulf “War” veterans. Ignorant conscripts were killed by their supposedly “protective” medications.

To be honest I believe the 1960’s flower power movement was a corporate inspiration too. Either that or corporates rode the coattails of the general erosion of faith in traditionalism (also a reaction to the distrust that blew over into anti-war mass desertions from Vietnam?). When did “the people” ever make any sincere [group] initiatives for themselves? I believe the powers wanted to introduce contraception universally. By that token, temporarily encouraging promiscuity was the only rational lever against the [Catholic] Church. Even so, to this day Catholicism has not bowed to Zionism on that level. The sexual revolution was predictably short lived. Prominent film stars, HIV and AIDS put a huge damper on any free thinking after the 1980’s.

It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world.

I haven’t personally referenced Jon Rappoport’s “AIDS Inc.” (1988) but I feel sure he will have delivered correct conclusions after reviewing his various websites. Paedophilia is also nothing short of a stagnant political move as are all other trappings designed to bolster the Eugenic movement’s determination to deny life. Forget the hotbed “abortion”. From the lofty position of purity, is not contraception the undeniable attempted murder of an unborn child? Given their Zionist-Bolshevik tactics, I would be very surprised if the visceral anti-abortion lobby is not another face of the same arbitrary plutocracy. When “they” decide they need to repopulate, anti-abortion will become the new flavour of the month. Currently abortion is a decoy that removes the sting from contraception.

Those demonstrably anti-paedophilia have been set up, applied more or less zero attention to the real issues. The shambles that is “organised” (a splintered, refracted mess) society is our testament. Rationalist Eckhart Tolle makes a surprising amount of sense in his claim that classical crusaders crusade merely for empowerment of their egos. I extend that philosophy somewhat and emphasise the bigger and more divisive the “cause” (sic), the greater the “individual” empowerment. There is no bigger cause than paedophilia currently. It is the mother of all causes today. Protesters, critics and complainers keep well clear of truth in order to preserve their egos. Maintaining the fantastical narrative line in deference to truth is the objective goal. Besides, if their “big issue” was to evaporate indefinitely, aimless lives would have nothing to bolster egos. Political spin, intricate make-believe dressed as truth has avowed the horrible “standards” that have cultured public infatuation.

Because the cultivation of biological automatons is the brainchild of the “program’s” covert marketing arm, Zionism (symbolising prison planet), there is almost absolute topical congruity between the mainstream and “alternative” press instruments. Alternatives also weave their own brands of make-believe and encourage that most foul of whimsical, plausible denials’ – “who to believe?” Indeed, as most independent or third party writers and journalists are incapable of doing much more than parroting or reacting against information issued by mainstream/alternative “authorities”, sanity has become wedged somewhere between a rock and a place beyond vital imagination. Even the great Jon Rappoport hasn’t ever dared offer paedophilia a fair birth from what I have read. Only an extraordinary journalistic genius with a death wish could and would religiously tackle this subject with unbiased sincerity. Like homosexuality in its wake, paedophilia now humbles the zealous.

Arguably everything political began with the collapse of Atlantis. After the Pharisees (the theoretical Atlantis “derelicts” Nicolai Levashov mentions in his illuminating book “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors”) conquered relative druidism 3,000 years ago, a globalist agenda has followed the uniform path towards the “program’s” unilateral attempt aimed at shaping all other creeds and cultures in its image. Permitting only Puritan adjusted worship is one of the many small steps aimed to configure that grand design. Sharia Law (a cauldron of intolerance; banning all manners of sexual expressions), incidentally, few seem to real realise, is iconic Zionist Law.

Political charades “for order” are exploited by puppeteers that use militant groups (deliberately formed for such purposes) such as “ISIS” and “Al Qaeda” to instil fear. Labelling of designate “children” (with 21 desired as the ideal age barrier) and applied sexual prohibition has been a long standing goal that heralds back to the Victorian era (and presumably prior). In some ways it surprises me that Gladstone did not realise the utopian objective back in the nineteenth century. Although with infant mortality prevalent and the need for fodder for wars to once and for all break the opposition in his time, outcomes and their contingencies have been predictable to say the least.

Maybe it was last year or perhaps the year before when I noticed a mainstream headline that poked me in the eye. It was significant enough to spur me to remove MSM as my default webpage. The article in question presented one of America’s provincial sheriffs’ who was voicing implausible concerns over a child rape trial. The “child”, at the time, had been seventeen years old. Two days before her eighteenth birthday, she had allegedly voluntarily engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse (statutory “rape”) with her [then] boyfriend. Only in America could a “trial” like that be “taken seriously”. But it does highlight the fact that the “program’s” zeal is all about fanatically vigilant oppressive power of order, bereft of sane judgement. Australia (where I live currently) handles these matters differently.

Over a decade ago a mature looking twelve year old, blonde haired girl produced a bouncing heir with her [also] underage boyfriend (if memory serves me right, he was fifteen). The sensational TV show “Current Affair” was all over the news like a baby’s rash. They “named and shamed” everyone they could collect until everyone associated turned bright purple and frothed at the mouth. Nothing was done about the couple because nothing could be done so, after the furore, everyone politely looked the way, except there was a sequel. The hapless girl dared produce a second sprog at age sixteen by the same father (this time presumably of father worthy age). Sacra-bleu!!!!! I hope the TV show paid her well. She deserved every cent. He was almost certainly jailed for twenty years or more.

There is actually quite a long history behind changing attitudes. Chronologies (were they to be read and digested) would go a long way to diffusing the sheer insanity that currently embroils the paedophilia “outrage”. Attitudes have, in some ways, remained the same but it is reflective contingences employed that have radically altered. Perhaps making the adolescent discovery tour “theoretical” has helped induce mesmerised masses. People’s inability to focus on anything in isolation (thus perpetually basing existence on generalities) appears to be the most devastating symptom of the “TV age”.

One could look back at the collapse of craft industries in favour of industrial commercialism as the beginning of the withering of independent mind [that worked off trial and error and, ultimately, questioned everything]. In the eighteen and nineteenth centuries there were occasional challengers. Disparate groups, such as the Luddites, did attempt to block imperial progress. Interestingly, prior toindustrialisation”, learning centres were almost exclusively used to prepare society’s elite classes. In fact, going much further back, I would argue it was only after the abolition of the mystery schools (run by the druids) in the Dark Ages that saw the shift from education to processed dogma learnt by rote as the staple for mainstream education.

Even those that complete a Master’s Degree today are given no marks for personal input beyond how it satisfies comprehension of “evidence”) (i.e. synthesised “worthy” information that has been rubber stamped by “credentialed” proscribed agents of globalism under the thumb). To which end eventually none dare question established “rules” which are actually beyond question. It is also duly noted that the precise same strategy has been used by political proponents that word laws governing paedophilia in ways to ensure any possible “right minded” intellectual protagonist’s challenge would be judged as spitefully ambiguous (at best). I find no evidence supporting rationale behind our current childhood threshold and can but assume the demonstrably baseless “18” figure was pulled out of thin air at the whim of some starched bureaucrat or other. Globalist hacks have been running “Holocaust style” attack campaigns against anyone that dare test viability ever since.

It was not that long ago when the age of [marital] consent was “12” (following ancient Roman tradition) in some US states and the European nation of Holland. America may be recognised as the modern day super power, but originally it was founded and developed as a formidable expansion of the Union of Jacob (or Great Britain), so the history of English law making plays extreme relevance to this debate. There was no legal age of consent until one of the British Middle Ages Kings decided to impose boundaries through fear that there would be no under limit to matrimonial alliances (or presumed sexual liaisons) with maidens. I am deliberately foggy on “which king” it was because I would like it to be Norman Jew William the Conqueror (who ushered in a “new age of [cloaked] Zionism”) as it does fit well with my overall patter. So if he’s the one, top marks for me.

Either way, for the best part of a millennium “the people” and their ruling powers had no objection to marital unions between de facto “adults” from age twelve. It was a king (the “contemporary” power) who had instigated radical new restrictions (be it conceived from ancient foundations) which also implies some marriages (prior to law) were made between parties (maidens specifically) aged less than twelve years. One would imagine that a small popular core would have always been against “young” marriages, whereas the majority must have been easy with whatever was the conventional norm. The perennial remainder (probably an equally distinct minority) are traditionally mostly shown as bloated cadaverous sorely vocal antagonists destined to bluster at first sight of illuminated “reasoning” by compilers of historic propagandas. Those that covet callous restrictions will do anything to preserve them.

In medieval times (as emphasised earlier) the age of consent strictly concerned marriage but did not place any focus on sexual activities outside matrimony. That was left to religion. Western religion is an adaptation of Roman paganism. Therefore when Christianity sprouted from the burning embers of Gnosticism, naturally austere (Pharisee promoted) rules were applied to marriages which ideally revered all lustful and licentious behaviours as “ungodly”. A functional allowance was made for purposes of procreation. Per this fashion, an adaptation of orthodox Jewish attire, the Christian bridal gown, attempted to limit “lustful” sexual intercourse between marital partners. Even so, for a great period (can anyone say with “authority” how long?) the proverbial line was drawn at age “12”.

So how has this ongoing “con operation” been run in a way to successfully beguile the madding masses? Today’s mental health institutions and asylums for the insane provide glimmers of insight. I determine that the profession’s handbook outlining three hundred or so “behavioural conditions” is simply an expansion of crass religious judgement as to what it is to be “good” or “evil”. Jon Rappoport regularly advises all behaviours classed as varied evidence of insanity are equally symptoms of normal behaviour. Evil (as termed) actions therefore are now indefinitely branded as manifest insanity. Modern society runs on adapted rules that are designed to obfuscate the truth, so while one could argue we are either “more” or “less” free than before, in principal only “terminologies” have changed and not the convictions that delivered them.

When the world was conquered in the 1650’s (capitalising on discoveries such as the United States of America), there was an uncomfortable transition from royal to civilian government power. The full changeover took about 300 years and today no royal wields any visible power. It was only after civilian government was firmly rooted that perceived social issues were targeted by the pariahs of control to facilitate their utopian dream agenda. Of course, the ideal policy (as far as they are concerned) is always eradication, but when (as is so often true) extreme measures fail, soft humanitarian ploys are stealthily drafted. Similar to current workings of political/legal administration, reasons behind tortured virtue offered as “grounds” rarely (if ever) matched true objectives behind schemes unveiled as “value solutions”.

High Victorian British politics eventually found a Prime Minister with the right measure of zealous hatred to tackle youth sex head on with a proverbial sledge hammer. Himself a reputed brothel crawler (and paedophile), William Gladstone first increased the age of consent to “15” in 1875. So foul was his hatred it inspired infection and; consequentially, he succeeded in raising “the bar” again to “16” by 1878. This did nothing to inhibit intimate relations with children, as evidenced in outpourings of diatribe over the plight of a pregnant provincial London prostitute aged ten in the early 1900’s. Whether the girl was anything more than a figment of the imagination remains to be proven. There are numerous other period artistic writings that might be sourced to highlight identical topical content.

Logic underpinning Gladstone’s reasoning behind the marital age of consent increases was null and void, more or less precisely equating to William the Conqueror’s war spoil “logic”. Age fifteen, and then sixteen, was simply deemed “young enough”. No science or consideration to individuals’ right to choose was applied or contemplated. Each was a corporate edict for the nonsense that is proscribed as the “greater good”. The same lack of basis was approximated in 2001 when Great Britain almost paved the way to the “program’s” supreme goal “21”. If legislation for the age of consent (now beyond marriage, of course) set at twenty one had passed, the rest of the world (an extension of Great Britain) would have been doomed to follow, eventually. In other words, legislations are arbitrary measures. Construction of a “group identity” model permitting only standardised values and behaviours for standardisation’s sake is the selfish result. Given the raft of evidence, even a slothful fool should determine this always has been (albeit in varied forms) the plan; though few “in power” would dare agree or admit to their repugnant deceitfulness.

The reason the powers have dimly promoted their numerous nurturing society “concepts” (even though society does anything but nurture) is messages are designed to make the opposite of truth “appear” truthful. In fact categorisation/classification of [designate] children supports a global social enslavement program (one of numbers of cultural adjustment frameworks that are currently processed simultaneously and connected via the World Wide Web and other international exchanges). In effect, each synthesised cycle is designed to break children into new gormless adult slaves as asset-worthy (“useful”) fodder to man the system. Per this design, children are instructed fantasy is more plausible than truth, though (thankfully) not every teacher plays dumb.

Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood.

Individuals (making up the majority) that are determined to be law abiding (patriotic) become effective prisoners in their own open society. Sexual repression invariably leads to differing communication problems between sexes and, to a certain degree, estranges relations. The miraculous presupposed instant transition from impertinent scripted childhood to “proficient” adulthood does not prepare the way for pretty society. Each new insolent, spoilt, self-centred, experience lacking generation of “adults” attempts to crudely push its way up the queue. Many have predictably abused their supposed “right” to say no and have been conditioned into thinking any (and all) natural sexual acts are “theoretical” forms of rape. Few adults will contend there are only determinations to be and no “rights” at all (a fact the “program” callously capitalises on).

Culturally male/female roles/mindsets have not kept pace with everything else that has been going on in the background (i.e. systemic shredding of individualistic natural sexual dignity). One consequence is men and women are still destined for classical marital unions (even if not in name). Men, per this profile, must seek sexual gratification and women should provide the opportunity (i.e. male hunters, female prey). However, because women now collaterally (i.e. “the great group”) envisage all sex acts as “potential” forms of rape, they have been given an enormous degrading power.

In their administrative capacity, they can permit undignified sexual acts with whomever they choose, when legitimate and “legal”. Downgraded social ethics have had the effect of dragging all women down to the realms of whoredom (or celibacy for dissenters). Any whore’s power is her “right” to administer sex “favours”. “Program” masters know this full well. Their “combobulation” child exploitation takes whoredom away from the spotlight. Thus, the modern day whore cannot traffic (an exploit variant) him or herself. He or she must traffic another or others. Prostitution, from the time it was labelled “the oldest profession”, has been effervescently legitimised. “Populist” anger has specifically shifted from attacking prostitution in general to the [predominantly phantom] child sex industry. This is not to say “decent society” is comfortable with prostitution, but affairs of the flesh do not antagonise in the way they used to.

Physiologically, the only morally valid justifications behind any prohibitions of sexual acts might be on grounds of “lack of fertility” or body “immaturity” (which would provide basis for the mother of debates if tackled sincerely). Those proven unfertile could be justifiably deemed sexually unaccountable and, providing “procreation” was seen as the only functional benchmark for that type of communication, it could be outlawed to satisfy the requirements range outlined. There is actually quite a big degree of variance in apt statistical data on this arena. The youngest “woman” (on record) ever to birth a child was aged six. Women, in general, may begin their menstrual cycles from about age nine. Men are late risers with the ability to ejaculate prevalent usually from about age thirteen. The youngest father (for my research) is listed as aged eleven.

According to “nature” (reflective of God), a sexual metamorphosis demonstrably takes place in women at age nine and men of age thirteen. Thus, an uncomfortable surplus of wilderness years in respect of current legal accountability should be duly noted. Wilderness years, in the case of women, number nine. For men there are five years. How is this legal accountability in any way, shape or form naturally legitimate? By the time an average woman turns eighteen half her life has been sexual. God’s blessing has been terrorised and abused by society’s ignorance and abject subservience to the “program”. Terrorist peers foist the consequences of their foul laws on the trembling masses producing barely a shudder of dissent. Yet all should be acutely aware that these measures are designed purely to degrade the majesty of sexual intercourse to further scope for the production of “efficient” human “automatons”. Killing off stagnant populations is a fringe benefit.

When a woman turns eighteen, psychologically, nothing changes. Her mindset is still the same as it was before. She had been sexual but to be sexual was to “sin” (a pharisaic Judaic preconception) and this was “forbidden” (fruit). She was sexual but, as nothing has actually changed, to be sexual now IS to “sin”. There is one difference and it’s a big one. It is the power of control. Before she could illegitimately offer sexual consent or forbidden fruit (opening the door to all sorts of nasty blackmail scenarios) and now she can legitimately grant sexual consent as the fruit is ripe (opening the door to all sorts of nasty “double standards”). This is how sexual women have been reduced to whoredom.

Men have paid the price too. The perverse game we call politics impinges on all male values. Those that are not avowed celibates are rapists-in-waiting. Under foul terms as these, any man that dares to succumb to sexual urges can and will be accused of theoretical rape. This is all courtesy of modern social-conditioning mechanisms geared to elevating fantasy. The average woman now believes she always has the “right” to determine which “rapes” are permissible. She can also change her mind. That is the modern woman’s “privilege”. Women that kowtow with the “program”, in deference to God, lampoon our most uncharitable, sacrilegious, sanctimonious system of order. It is a system that relies on the deceit, dishonesty and partisan biased judgement of its user base. Never forget, all laws polarise judgement.

The crux of the arguments (ever so rarely in plain sight) supporting age legislation tend to rely on [corrupt] academic standards as “justification” for categorisations in place. Never mentioned are the numerous early teens “prodigies” put through the university system early. These are the anomalies that frustrate the “program”. The maturity gap, when inspected in detail, is far larger than most would imagine. For example, in relatively recent times a six year old British boy was heralded as the new oils (painting) master. Back in the 1980’s a petulant pup became a self-made millionaire (when being a millionaire meant something) in computers before he had reached his tenth year.

Martha Argerich’s (a celebrated Argentine virtuoso) notorious 1949 first public performance of the piano solo of Beethoven’s first concerto when she was seven years old presents an interpretation that would put most adults to shame. There is an account of a nine year old girl who successful singlehandedly reared the surviving family for several weeks after her mother died. Only lack of money ultimately frustrated her course. Given these facts, age legislation is indisputably unfair. Why is it supported so widely and so staunchly by our trembling masses?

There is a simple answer sadly seemed beyond the lateral comprehension of ordinary folk. In fact the answer has already been substantively outlined. People are generally pathetically weak and lazy. The largest, most incessantly in focus voices always seem to grab the limelight, founding “opinions” as they go. Mass Medias, therefore, control the way people generally think. Yes there are occasional dissenters, but, generally speaking, mass Medias tend to push (control) the populist view. That is because supporting broadcasters employed by mass Medias are people too. Broadcasters are not significantly different to any average man on the street. They too are mostly weak and lazy and don’t like to think too deeply about “obvious” issues. Of course, on the other hand, if the majority mysteriously morphed into dissenters, mass Medias would disappear as fast as they appeared and the “program” would perhaps have to engage dogmatic religion to shore up cultural adjustments once more.

Weakness and laziness by themselves do not cement opinions that are used to back legislation, such as edicts supporting age restrictions. People act because they feel empowered by acting. There is a fundamental perceived payoff for parents that support the synthetic dividers separating proscribed “children” from “adults”. The payoff is controlling power. Being the boss or “king” must be regarded as the pinnacle of empowerment and, consequentially, families have been moulded into control hierarchies. Perhaps this has always been the case. For as long as historic memory records, periodic shifts to varied standards used to justify different age categorisations have been relatively seamless. That, by no stretch of the imagination, makes wrongright”.

We must never underestimate conditioning mechanisms in the background geared to advancing false status-quo. Currently, each new crop of sexual children is deliberately immersed in cultures of facile restriction. Years long torment offers the vague promise of “freedom” (age eighteen “adulthood”). Developmental pressure builds from “terrible teens” to graduation. Many have willingly tried to believe in law and order to be patriotic (one of the group). They never rebelled. They never came to terms with what they had been denied. They never attempted to discover. Therefore, the majority of emerging and new adults bitterly support a terrorising system because they were “forced” into making sacrifice themselves.

In other words, pathetically weak adults will go to any lengths to wreak revenge on their kith and kin simply to appease their own failed ethical development. If you cannot honour yourself, how is it possible to behave responsibly to others? The great tragedy is [it seems] that people are incapable of recognising their sexuality or, to a greater degree, understanding how corporate interests stole their natural development. If age standards defining adulthood were radically shifted upwards to say forty years as the new age of consent, I do not believe there would be any major rebellion (after the first generation targeted was out of mind’s way). Old habits die hard, so I will concede the “powers” would have a hell of a marketing task ahead of them. How to convince all those marginalised people that merely want to behave naturally they are “wrong” to do so?

I have already outlined that British legislation tabled an increase to age twenty one in 2001, so why stop there? If the predominant cause behind age laws is nothing short of a population control/reduction measures, then (given the ever rising masses) logic suggests further increases are going to be ushered in. (Subtly ignoring the ethics nightmare exposing the true face of industrialism) China’s austere corporate experiment permitting only one child per family unit predictably failed dismally. Then again, if you can forbid sovereign adults “sexual license” by labelling them as “children” in legislation, the outlaw of procreation satisfies an expansion of the eugenics mantra. Ages twenty five and thirty marked traditional ancient Roman and Jewish commencement of maturity. Age fifty is of religious significance in Tibetan culture (and generally classed as the start of “middle age” in the west). Seventy five is another modern western classification milestone representing maturity or “old age”.

There potentially is no upper limit. Perhaps in the future sexual permits will be kept to octogenarians, the well-to-do that satisfy legal “exemptions” (loopholes) and “approved” (sanctioned) whores (to “service” the well-to-do)? Slavish automatons would do well to understand that each (fiendish) plan can only be stymied by the lack of faith of its designers. Confidence in communication is everything, but that is ultimately largely backed by compliance test initiatives. A sound pitch bolsters faith and the rest can be left to chance. What better target to exploit than “the family”? By turning corporate-political objectives into “family planning” advice, devious powers have cast a brilliant initiative. Families can now blame themselves for government issues and most will be oblivious to the fact. Admittedly a few have been waking up to the truth that “schooling” is actually social indoctrination in drag. But is this enough to spur momentum towards worldwide clear vision and outright revolution?

Times have changed greatly. In England years ago when attitudes were different, the age of consent was still sixteen. People could and did enter into marital unions at that age. These were normally sexual unions too. But that was trivial because teenagers (prevalently over twelve years old) also commonly interacted sexually. Legally underage pregnancies were unsurprisingly not particularly scarce. Ironically and sadly, the great “outrage” was against additional “family burden” as the young were obliged to be indoctrinated at school and few would have had the influence to earn “breadwinning money”. To me it shows just how pitifully inherently selfish people are. If only the vigour applied to blame and transference was directed at taking ownership of problems and compassionate dedication to delivery of lasting real solutions, then societies might be something to be proud of.

A long time ago, when I was fifteen, my mother asked my father to give me some sex advice. I vividly remember how he approached the cause. “You know all about it [sex], don’t you son?” He stammered, confidently. I nodded back wisely, as I had been the proud owner of a well-thumbed “hard core” adult magazine from age fourteen. Indeed, the pages were so well loved; they had come away from the staples in places. The point being is my father was too embarrassed to broach the subject of sex with me. It remained the unspoken understanding for as long as he lived. He used to use euphemisms like “it’s as easy as riding a bike” when he knew I kept damned well falling off. This is the norm, I’m told. Occasional controlling parents spew their ill-founded opinions. The rest offer silence when the silly puns run out.

Controlling parents aim to censor inappropriate behaviours. These might include masturbation in public. A Talmudic branch of Christianity called the Baptist Church (traditionally) labels masturbation a “sin”. Offspring of Baptist families are surely dealt all sorts of psychological blows unless they adjust to being exceptionally deceitful.  When I was very young I remember all the local kids in my playgroup used to occasionally interact with [vaguely sexual] truth or dare games. My own junior sister was particularly prolific in her formative years. We lived in a rural Jacobean period farmhouse which had a winding spiral staircase to the upper floors. Between beams my father had lodged makeshift cream chipboard panels to form walls and these made as excellent “scribbling” white boards.

One day, after a rather heated discussion with my mother, my sister (then age six) drew a biro cartoon of a “matchstick” couple copulating to prove she knew about sex. I am not sure it was a masterpiece but it was technically sufficient for the purposes under scrutiny, earning an immediate deletion under a double layer of white paint. Interestingly my mother never punished my sister for that and said nothing more on the subject. What could she be “punished” for? Knowing the truth? It seems fitting to roll out Krishna’s immoral quote (a regular visitor to this website) once more, “Spirituality brings to freedom whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What would Krishna have said about modern day paedophilia hysterics?

Perhaps it is no accident that the powers behind their mischief “program” sometimes refer to themselves as the Annunaki Brotherhood. The Order’s iconography depicts a thick braided cross trapped by an unbroken wicker circle. Cosmically, a cross represents path choices but the circle closes off any avenue of inquisitive exploration. The icon, therefore, is the “prison planet” or Zionism symbol. It sets paralysis standards (put into motion by pharisaic usurpers); the ones Krishna described as “evil”. Social paralysis begins with restriction of will [of the child] to confuse the mind (spiritual centre) in order to produce broken, de-spiritualised adults (slaves by any other name). To socially outlaw sexuality is to remove the most fundamental of all birth rights. Bodies without minds are only capable of following orders.

But there is more. Few are aware of the true potence of sexual self-esteem. Potent life is contained in the chakra governing the erogenous zones from conception. Those that deliberately superficially attack sexual developmental behaviour aim to create literal zombies – walking dead!