I recently read an article explaining that the ancient Atlanteans had punched hole (or tore a rip) in the time/existence continuum (space), allowing negative (under developed or ‘damaged’) entities to flood into third and fourth (Tara) dimension realities. For anyone aware of philosophy built around the Sphere of Amenti chronologies, will have their belief systems instantly affirmed.
However, assessing truth from fantasy is not so easy; nay hazardous, considering mainstream history has more or less reduced the notion of Atlantis as a myth of Plato. This is scornfully resolved as a possible real, distant point of existence [probably] somewhere beneath the Atlantic Ocean, but certainly nothing that would frustrate the hunter-gatherer model for the development of man. Indeed less feckless considerations, observing rafts of ancient texts and strange “other worldly” maps imply Atlantis stretched from the Arctic Circle down to Northern Africa, taking up land areas we now call the “Northern Hemisphere”. Oddly they also appeared to have owned the ancient Rainbow City located at Antarctica. Central lands, shall we say located in today’s tropical regions, were evidence of older civilisations cultivating Mu. That technological heart is deep beneath the Pacific Ocean. Atlantean genetic and weaponry research centres were smashed by Falla around 15,800 years ago. What might be salvaged is encased in the ice and rock that constitutes our Artic Circle.
To be honest, I have yet to formally decipher whether the alleged rip in the space time continuum is evidence of truth or wilful fantasy. Inherent, cyclic knowledge gives no clear indicators other than, considering their reputation as “keepers of wisdom”, the Atlanteans did some pretty stupid things. Sure, the redskins may well say that risk is a rite of passage, but there is risk and RISK. Acts of gross stupidity were not just limited to the Ants (a pet name of the peoples of Atlantis). Lemurian regal agents of the Lumerians were determined to negotiate feats of impossibility either as cloaked hostile attack initiatives or predictive defences. Is this any different to our Military Industrial Complex?
Cracks in Atlantean wisdom are no better demonstrated through consequence of them “losing” the atmosphere on Mars sometime in the 35th millennium BC. Quick thinking and action saved 10%, but the enormous loss of life and tragic consequences could have been avoided. Reading inherence, I observe the sense “how the high and mighty have fallen”. In essence, the Ants appear to have been over confident of their abilities. Poor decisions, arrogance and fundamental ignorance, as great as they were, were the strict causes of their downfall. Dare I say, their idle of boasts of absolutism could not be balanced by humble due diligence.
After the disaster of 10,581BC which may have ended humanity (if so we were restocked from exo-planetary genetic resource holdings), the Draco very much took ownership of the human project and they, in turn, were the ones that designed Judaism as the fundamental, authoritarian “best of breed” philosophy to govern harmonised society. Original rhetoric included acts of cruelty that might only be judged as inhumane. At the start of this new regime for man, some rather nasty looking reptilian priests and their guards would have administered order. That overt presence was abruptly hidden after, presumed, en-masse rebellion. In order to rule by proxy, the Draco genetically manufactured grey-blue vaguely human-looking dwarfs, we call Futczhi (or Zeta-Draco) today. Zetas strictly observe order, but have angelic qualities that, perhaps, surpass all other types. The Futczhi were supreme intellectuals having brains capacities more than double the size of an average human.
I would imagine that the Futczhi would have been highly regarded, being both angelic and wise, though ultimately they did not retain the administration as, but for a few spurious and enigmatic mummified bodies, they neither exist nor does any [tangible] evidence supporting it today. I should add that a number of films do imply the existence of the Futczhi. Charles Hall’s description of the “greys” also seems to fit their profile and he has assured audiences of their location on (or in) our moon with occasional visitation via light portal (backed up by an unintentional Brazilian film). Apparently their evolution is no longer supported by our atmosphere (i.e., some reptilians are hydrogen breathers)
In order to impose credibility for Judaism, mainstream history appraises this as the first civilised religion. Of course, followers of esoteric texts know Judaism cannot possibly be the first organised system of monotheism. Indeed Biblical texts are contradictory and offer numerous “versions” of God. These can be principally divided into version of the (plural) Elohim “light being” Gods, Yahweh (or Jehovah) and Ba’al (Adonis or Lord). We learn from Sumerian tablets that Ba’al(s) are significant manifestations of (water based) Anunaki overlords. Enki and Enlil are two famous names. Interestingly, Ba’al generally (but not exclusively) receives a bad press in the Bible. In my opinion this is because the work represents much “inherited wisdom” of the Draco, who had successfully fended off a number of direct attacks from the Anunaki overlords over the eons. Myth of Inanna and other ancient tales give some insight as to the hierarchical struggle to control the “underworld” (which was partly an Anunaki domain via matrimonial alliances anyway).
Judaism assimilated the doctrine of prior philosophic orders. These, today, are known as Zoroastrianism and Buddhism. The existential difference between the two camps can be simply expressed. Zoroastrianism took the position that external forces influenced the body as opposed to Buddhism’s “body is the temple” (managing all external forces). The former focused on the without and the latter projected the within. Hybrid Judaism elevated the inner by terms of the outer and that produced a dichotomy of values which ultimately led to the doctrines, Pharisaic and Gnostic order. The Pharisees were the precursor to science-atheism, material accountability. Gnostics were deeply spiritual, artistic mystics. The terms of engagement have not changed as today reductionist (atheist) wisdom competes with “new age” hybrid catholic-Buddhist “cosmic consciousness” (or Christ’s Consciousness).
We must turn the clocks back over 100,000 years to understand how this started. This time long preceded the disaster which sucked the atmosphere off Mars. Planetary re-colonisation can only be speculated, but it was likely after a war which ran for 18,000 years ending with the destruction of the largest Earth moon 104,000 years ago. All these figures are rounded to nearest 100 or 1000 years as it is very hard to be any more precise. The Atlanteans had been stationed on Earth through the war period, though I sense they joined the fray in the late stages of the altercations. It is also likely (as is more and more the case today) wars were fought covertly for the large part. I am sure the safety aspect of the shattered Earth moon made relocation to Mars an obvious choice and this places the move at 102,000BC. Thus, the Atlanteans were on Mars between 102,000-33,000BC (as a rough date range). Incidentally, one of their first early noteworthy acts of magnificence after returning to Earth was the construction of the Sphinx in the 32nd millennium BC. This was followed by the Great Pyramid of Giza in the 29th millennium BC.
In the meantime, back on Mars, the Lumerians joined and complimented Atlantean society prior to 73,000BC because that is when their exodus to Earth established the great Mu civilisations which ended after the mismanaged cosmic event in the 24th millennium BC. St Germaine mistakenly identified the event as the “end of Atlantis”. It was the end of Mu which is now submerged by the Pacific Ocean. The error is all the more excusable as the Lumerians could be regarded as a “branch” of Atlantis civilisation. On Mars they joined existing Atlantean culture. This was reversed with the Ants return to Earth in 33,000BC. I am reliably informed that ancient Martians (being a combination of Lumerians, Atlanteans, Neanderthal or Homo erectus “slave” classes and Lemurian military networks) lived in open, communal dwellings (houses had no doors or windows).
For their part, guided by deep hierarchical protocols, the Ants presided over an ancient library of knowledge that stretched back to the dawn of time (by all accounts). Similar to our society very few were given the keys to all the knowledge, but unlike our nepotistic orders, the keys had to be earned. Let us think of their holders of wisdom as politician with real credibility. Decisions then were free of bluff and bluster, but this did not limit risks or inconceivable arrogance. In a sense, though philosophies/knowledge was markedly different to our modern science subset, their wisdom was a version of Zoroastrian Pharisaic order. Lumerians complimented this approach as they were the mystics, enterprising sorcerers, expressive artists and managers of spiritual energy domains (including masters of sexual energy). It could be said that the Ants were everything physical and the Lumerians determined with metaphysically, but this would only act as a rough guide as there were many cross overs. Wisdom, then, understood the power of the mind and manipulated it to great cosmic effect. I talk about a layer that separates matter and “God” (Prime Source) in my book (recently renamed and expanded in size) “The Beauty of Decoded Existence”. The Ants could manipulate that layer (using their minds) to transmute matter – turn wood into gold, for instance.
Somehow the intrinsic, seamless flow of cooperation led to a competition between wisdom and mysticism. Zoroaster is much older than academics postulate. He was around prior to the lead up to the tragically violent 6-7th millennium BC. Rumours of his Vimana found lodged in an Afghan “time well” should be taken seriously (though “dates” not). He had some strange powers that transcend logic and what we judge to be “natural order”. Gautama Buddha merely redefined a much more ancient doctrine managed by the Lumerians. Included was sexual reasoning that might be determined perverse by modern Pharisaic law makers. Lust was regarded as an adjunct to and not “part of” procreation. That is the great battle of modern times and why, by Pharisaic doctrinal definition of procreation, lust should be immoral and illegal (according to their reduced logic). “Children” are the currency and casualty of that war. The deeper question worthy of wider consideration is, after the war is over and wisdom trumps mysticism, will humanity inevitably learn the two are inseparable and without balance social function will collapse?