Garbled Philosophy Applied to Immunization to Ultimately Commit Genocide?

Some have been possessed with foresight enough to acknowledge the gaping flaw pertaining to Louis Pasteur’s Immunization Theory is the very underlying philosophy that permits its authority. According to championing medical preachers, a body’s immune system is generally deficient in its construction, unable to meet challenges of defense against disease by natural means. Thus, short of “medical” intervention, humanity is doomed to perish from resulting attacks delivered by unknown and unseen invaders, such as “Coronavirus”. “Viruses” (ushered in long after Pasteur’s death) of course compose formulated doctrines based on set biological patterns, because (other than those with ancient historic origins, such as tetanus and rabies) none have actually been isolated. Ignoring the fact that dis-ease implies illness stems from the mind’s inability to deal with a body’s biological complications, vogue medical ideology prior to Pasteur’s evocation was quite different in character. Notably, pioneer Antoine Bechamp (Pasteur’s teacher) emphasized the significant role of external terrains over a body’s resources. Consequentially, from his painstaking research, the great scholar was able to collectively identify how internal blood systems reacted to varied incoming environmental threats.

To him, the idea of injecting someone with a serum was notionally flawed. Nevertheless, precise words from a well-coined quote of his are as follows [translated from French]: “the most serious disorders may be prevented by the injection of living organisms into the blood…into a medium not intended for them”. The emphasis here is on “may” here, reinforced by the warning “not intended for them”. In effect he postulated that a vaccine might meet the same reaction as bacteria when introduced to the body. The world has sadly moved on in the opposite direction since Bechamp’s time (at the turn of the nineteenth century). Current vaccines deliver non-living biological matter and inanimate particles, such as heavy metals (mercury, aluminum) and formaldhyde (rat poison), to “patients” in some cases. Indeed, according to medical insider rumours, prions (forms of retro-virus) cultivating bovine spongiform encephalopathy (better known as Mad Cow Disease) is the sensational mystery ingredient aimed at “boosting” certain batches of COVID vaccine.

History of serum contamination (as there is no sound explanation for the presence of heavy metals), certainly demonstrated many positives following a study of one hundred different brands by an independent Italian research team back in 2016. Roughly thirty per cent of samples tested showed identifiable traces of aluminum. Findings have failed to impress successive Italian governments though, who had been pushing for mandatory immunization against Covid for local departing international travelers from late last year. All the while, an angry posse (40,000 strong and growing) of world class doctors continuously protest at “flawed reasoning” behind untried and untested compounds being used against an unknown virus that has shown to be “treatable” using standard influenza remedies (if only China had listened), before deaf bureaucratic ears. In fact, any serious analysis of history damns the grubby enterprise. For example, work on the Gates/Fauci/Soros “Frankenstein jab” began nearly a decade before Coronavirus came to light. How can that be? Per immunization philosophy, how is a predictive remedy possible? According to hidden reports there could be some ambiguity over my use of “came to light” here. Anthony Fauci (in prep mode presumably) apparently boasted of a monumental pandemic coming very soon back on his 2017 American university tour.

Following my mention of that valiant Italian study, there is further hard evidence supporting the use of heavy metals in vaccines. Details provided under Eli Lily’s 1931 patent of Thimerosal are explicit. Mercury and Aluminum are two listed ingredients. A new 1950’s patent itemized Formaldehyde too. In terms of historic background, the product’s menacing curriculum vitae commenced with a miracle “chemo” (whatever that is) cure, but as none of the dozen or so terminally ill patients used as guinea pigs (primarily to justify the patent) survived any longer than expected, medical application was not widely adopted and that version was short-lived. Rebranded into various types of hospital sterilization agents, its continued employment is tragically marred. Taking form as bedpan cleaning powder, it was deemed to be the cause of Pink’s Disease and subsequently formally banned from use. Only after that shock were the boffins at Eli Lily forced to go back to the drawing board. Thimerosal’s Phoenician return, after strained deliberation, came as vaccine preservative. Because compounds don’t usually require individual ingredients listed, we could argue those horrible components (heavy metals, etc.) have found a way into vaccines via the “backdoor”. Details on when product was first added to improve inoculation compliance is ambiguous, but it may have been as early as the late 1980’s. Only a few years later, in 1993, educated Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s emphatic pleas stressing a definite vaccine/autism connection were aggressively shunned by an inept (and probably corrupt) establishment.

Others also came out. Predictably, conspiracies against fair dissemination of information were not limited to the attack on Wakefield. Everyone that went against authorities that wasn’t completely ignored earned a routine dose of tar and feather treatment. Adding to the fray, mainstream Medias have wasted no opportunities or effort to scanadalise “unconscionably stupid” anti-vaxxers. Their one sided war has found no bottom to the foul depths exposing shallow case arguments used, which almost exclusively forge basis from ingenuous superstitions cultivated from “vogue” mindset (i.e. emphasizing “the group” must be proper, because corresponding views are in vogue). Statistics drawn on never amplify the obvious fact that there is no demonstrable criterion to establish with any certainly that vaccines even “work”. Indeed, given all too numerous side effects, downplayed par for the course as far as they are concerned, any reasoning supporting supposed due diligence is nullified. Taking the instance of small pox history, records show incidence was on a rapid decline (or burn out) before vaccines were introduced. If alternative Media reports are to be heeded, the well-publicized Gates foundation gift to Indian hill tribes infected beneficiaries with polio. Information about the foundation’s subsequent involvement with Africa paints a familiar sorry tale. Then, of course, we have senior scientist Thompson’s sensation official confession to squelching data at the behest of Merck after he had internally reported finding a vaccine/autism link in African Americans. It seems no accident Executive director Julie Gerberding had overseen similar alleged antics by the Centers for Disease Control before she moved to Merck.

In other words, stakes are high and, thus, the game is played dirty. Naturally, following this protocol, according to the mainstream, believable accounts are exclusively issued by those [whether in authority or otherwise] that support their agenda. Pertaining to this, their very rogue utopian strategy espouses “vaccines will save the world so everyone must be inoculated at the drop of a hat, bar none”. As with maligned law court “expert” choruses, jurisdiction over such matters is greatly overstated in order to leverage perceptible advantage. Calculating the chance of finding and prepping willingly corrupt, sufficiently educated to maintain the elite agenda from the extraordinary numbers of peoples that inhabit the Earth is so high, it would prove an easy challenge to fulfill. We can see revolving flawed arguments have dominated politics for decades, so why not pollute the sciences too? On that front, some years ago I penned an article postulating that our sciences are illusory. Is an apple pushed or pulled to the ground by “gravity”? How can one definitively prove associated conjecture surrounding an invisible (and otherwise imperceptible) force? I maintain this is an impossibility without knowing the truth.

Equally, many of those defenders of “the system” use flawed equations to justify their belief that mitigated attacks aimed at dramatically reducing global populations would defy interests of commerce.  The supposition more people is better for business isn’t necessarily true. Greater numbers over the spread does provide traders more flexibility, but that is a double edged sword, for greater numbers compete over and limit availability of scarce resources as well. When analyzing need for war against diplomacy, we can quickly observe another critical defect in the defenders’ thinking. War is destructive. Precious assets are regularly contaminated or destroyed per course of operations, which, from a “cost with no reward” banking perspective is an undeniable “lose/lose”. In some instances, enormous numbers of innocent people are killed, mostly while evacuating conflict zones. Per Winston Churchill’s deliberations on the subject, these deaths are normally remembered as collateral damage through cause of friendly fire. Accountants may well lament over the fall of Iraq, for negotiation is always far cheaper, but I suppose corporate commerce did unilaterally secure the oil supply at enormous human tragedy. It seems to me, that beneath all its vain pledges of universal wellness and fickle prophecy promising the vanquish of all diseases, a vile, conscience absent black establishment heart is amply exposed by ongoing side by side intifadas that refuse to allow our world even a day’s break from perpetual battle.

In other writing projects, I have regularly introduced those enigmatic 1983 Georgia Guide Stones, my primary exhibit favouring a conspiratorial agenda against man. In biblical times, stone tablets laid down the Law. Laws which, per notional conceptualization, were never up for negotiation nor flexible. They dictated the way things should be, the way things are and the way things will be. So too, in my opinion, do the Georgia Guide Stones offer a rigid conceptual doorway to permanent modern morality. From its many illustrated commandments, my selected stanza insists global populations may not amass above five hundred million at any given time [a requirement of the messianic age?]. Taking current civilization levels, at an estimated seven billion, to meet orders would beckon a feat of divine intervention. But let’s face it, everlasting war has hardly had any stringent effect in pruning the masses. Besides, burgeoning birth rates aggressively outstrip consequential deaths. In many ways because their post 1950’s ongoing parallel war on disease has reduced infant mortality to such an extent, vicious authorities have generously “shot themselves in the foot”, but I guess they may use this advantage to overstate the impertinence of any genocide accusations leveled at them. Pertinently, cultures that traditionally produced vast numbers of offspring haven’t changed direction by much, so certain third world countries have sponsored unrelenting birth booms. Indeed, it would be reasoned to say human behaviour addressal has not kept pace with medically ordained goodwill initiatives. Yes, westerners have largely conformed with the program, but that is because the cream of (genuine) science either originates from or is adopted by the west. Ostracized other civilisations have dragged their heels and….everything else. Addicted to sexual reproduction, they simply haven’t been able to embrace the light.

In terms of drainage, war does more than destroy messily. Infrastructures and supply chains are critically resources heavy. Furthermore, dead and injured have to be found and buried or rescued, which is fine when the body counts run to hundreds of thousands. But an effective peoples’ purge (leaving only dead) would need to accumulate in the billions if it was to have any lasting negative impact on civilization; and any incursion would need to be conducted in double quick time to offset that ever growing birthrate juggernaut I mentioned earlier.One prior published writing project did the mathematics surrounding this very subject. Conclusions found any mass cull would need to be executed over minimum days to diffuse word of mouth warnings that might well proliferate an outwards funnel to fuel global panic (this making “wary” targets at least theoretically harder to locate and kill).

It is unlikely the purge is destined to be indiscriminate. Well-bred peoples, the bane of civilisations are most definitely not going to be in the target zone. Therefore, efforts must be condensed to succeed, discriminating between “in” (doomed) and “out” (survivors, i.e, might the whole of Brooklyn New York, be spared?) locations selected for decimation. Even so it would be impractical to presume experienced funeral personnel could be sifted from the remainder and saved. This is significant as, globally, currently a million (give or take) dead bodies are processed by various funeral systems annually. In terms of numbers, six thousand times that resource allocation should reduce populations to necessary Georgia Guide Stones compliant levels. Deceased would surely rot quickly and become volatile disease centres, so disposal remedies would need to be actioned within a maximum of three weeks to fend off emergence of a real potential global pandemic. Obviously, figures do not prepare for good omens here. With the surviving five per cent of trained mortuary workers to meet burden, group efforts would have to step up by a factor of two million (each mortuary worker must provide the labour resources equating to two million men to achieve deadlines). More realistically, even increasing standard workload by four fold, it would take approximately thirty thousand years to give all deceased a decent send off. Thus, I concluded in my prior article “the “powers” have gone totally bonkers” if they intend to implement this strategy. Now, I realise too that many may well sympathise with public wrath against hypothetical phantom menaces that have been aired by various lay preachers within earshot of Medias over the ages. Lay preachers invariably make abominable mathematicians and here carefully reviewed figures undeniably trump spiteful, flailing emotion. Indeed, under no circumstances would it be possible clear away the dead in sufficient time to halt aggressive plague. Perhaps the larger portion of habitable Earth would have to be demarked as “unsafe” in order to protect those that remained in circulation.

It goes without saying contingencies are destined to derail standard supply chains, in some instances, more or less to a halt. Under such conditions, survival will unlikely be a pleasant experience and may possibly well usher in terrible times with truncated to non-existent resources (that once were commonly available) fomenting acute dissatisfaction as to what the world has become. With staggering numbers of dead, it is unclear how far disease would travel, so, perhaps, nowhere would be classed as entirely safe without hospital grade protection measures. Who is going to manufacture basic supplies? How and by what means would they be delivered? But, perhaps, we don’t really need to contemplate over this at all. For instance, let’s say the powers did go totally bonkers, the mammoth perplexing question is: “who” (is trustworthy enough) to engage for a blitzkrieg-style attack on the masses that is so swift it beats the reaction to pulse news?

There would be mutiny across the military if such an unprovoked wide scale operation was sanctioned. The only other options could be the release of fatally noxious gases into large sections of the atmosphere or that clandestine “medical” attack I’ve already projected. The word on the street here [in Australia] is many will hold off [for years] until the [side] effects of Coronavirus vaccine are definitely not limited to the antipodes. Woeful laments reverberate echoes along the length of that US mass Media juggernaut. White evangelists located in the bible belt regions for one have lost faith in vaccinations. Of course any figures can be fudged, but as far as universal inoculation is concerned there ain’t going to be a blitzkrieg here or in any first world outpost, by any stretch of the imagination. If the truth be known, I assume the powers are caught between a rock and a hard place over this whole caper, but please let me explain my reasoning. I mean, the astute (glued to alternative Media resources) will know what’s really going on very quickly, though most people rely on the “machine” for their “news”. So here’s the problem. Presuming fear of vaccine side effects isn’t limited to Australians and American evangelists, if any of the many “solutions” touted raise alarms, all further campaigns are doomed to fail.

Even mainstream Medias know “people talk” and if their “holy” sentiment doesn’t reasonably align with popular gossip, well they are exposed because no one will believe them, and that, they know, maybe is enough for excommunication without parallels. Thus, were deceptive medical authorities to adopt a euthanasia drug that acts longer term, which might do the dirty business a few years down the track without unnecessarily ruffling feathers prior, many will still be waiting in the wings apprehensive of positive or negative symptoms when the true agenda comes to light. Slip stream word travels fast, so the moment inadvertent truth about vaccines became common knowledge, the whole operation would be more or less rendered stone dead without possibility for resurrection (praise be). Nevertheless, if a “few years down the track” equated to ten years (for instance), it is debatable whether future population targets would reduce sufficiently anyway. The crux is this. Were the potion to take poison effect in under five years, per my earlier specification, alarmists majorities are saved. If the “goodwill” period was sufficiently extended (beyond five years), influx of new births would amply replace numbers of provisioned dead. In addition, would breeding habits in the West radically change to compliment needs to fill otherwise lacking population gaps?

There’s another looming issue for those deviant industrious planners. Other than Gates/Soros Moderna, alternative branded vaccine options uniformly appear to be rush jobs. For instance, whilst Pfiser’s serum was officially pulled from Australia because there were no storage facilities cold enough, unconfirmed rumours around the circuit lay claim that some test patients in clinical trials had somehow managed to “catch HIV”. Those “in the know” know last HIV epidemic was the result of polio compounds being contaminated by selected hosts used to cultivate antigens (in this case live kidneys of chimpanzees and green monkeys). Old dogs rarely know new tricks, so I presume Pfiser’s current aborted effort went through the same paces as tainted polio in its wake. That aside, where unknown components are involved, science has a lousy record at substantiating effective prediction. Perhaps that is why America’s valiant Surgeon General rejected Gates/Fauci’s contagion [computer] modelling strategy when decisions were being made over approaches to Coronavirus. Does this also suggest there has been some skepticism in the belief in plague by some echelons of the American government?

So, returning to the powers’ “strategy blunder”, we have deliberated a vaccine earmarked to kill off users within five years may well prove a misnomer. There’s more to add on this. Results will depend on individual constitutions, spiritual strength and many other unseen factors, so I would imagine many of those “billed” to die simply won’t expire on schedule, courtesy of fate. Thus, considering feasibility sanely, this makes me think the whole charade is unlikely to the extreme. Though one can never entirely right anything off when it comes to “potty” establishment behaviour, my original determinations on the subject seem the most likely way events will trundle forward. These original determinations postulated the final solution would serve up injectable sterilization methodologies. Active critical ingredient linking all vaccines “solutions” most likely is planned to render all female users infertile. But why pick on females? Well, it seems the purpose is to neutralize potent genetic materials found in ovary eggs; the bourn of reproduction. Not that any mainstream source (to my extensive research) embraced the story, but according to cultural venting, Bill Gates inoculation of young Filipino women left participants incapable of childbirth. Sterilization was one point of a long list of reasons that apparently ended Gates Foundation tenure in Africa, once again according to superficial examinations. Significantly less breeders guarantees population nose dives without any impact on the funeral system.

Economies will eventually shrink certainly, but will also remain amply sufficient for purposes of aggressive commercial enterprise. In effect, the major consequence will ensure the privileged few each receive a much greater bounty of the world’s genuine treasures than before. Consumerism will wither as a concept resigned to a forgotten past. Naturally, distribution networks will have to morph into something leaner and meaner than we have today. Many industries will be forced to subside or bow out of existence due to lack of demand (potentially sponsoring the demise of many businesses that were successful prior to changes, well other than those retirement proof colonialist gems, doubtlessly). Middle classes and corresponding middle managers are doomed to have a very limited lifespan. Social strata will almost certainly comprise of bourgeoisie above proletariat, with next to nothing in-between. Aristocrats have always traditionally despised middle classes. Perhaps to stave off overt rebellion casual “whip masters” may find occasional footholds here and there, but that would be the exception, rather than the rule. Without doubt, the military and other cornerstones of “order” will be as bureaucratic as ever, proposing the only real opportunistic venues for career progression. Everywhere else, the haves will have and the have nots won’t and that is the way it will be.

It is important not to lose sight of the fact that the only other “worldwide” epidemic in living memory was HIV and that, our illustrious Medias inform us now, turned out to be a dud. Mostly identical contingency planners for Coronavirus are in position to pull strings. Jon Rappoport’s AIDS Inc. argues the earlier “great commercial opportunity” was a medical heist run by people who (largely) didn’t give a damn about healthcare or the authenticity of the plague concerns. They did care about money. How much it was going to cost to grease palms and rig market fear. How much they were going to reap from the enterprise. Jon’s book is jam packed full of detailed information but, for me, the most critical above critical specific path he follows provides reasons for why AIDS came into being. Truth on the matter would petrify the average gargoyle insomuch as it demonstrates “powers” possess neither conscience nor scruples. It is imperative to emphasise that HIV never did cause AIDS (just as Coronavirus possibly does not cause any deaths that show up as “positive”). AIDS was the resulting side effect of an anti-HIV drug called AZT. Vitally, those behind the introduction of AZT would have not been even slightly surprised by its toxic attack of any body.

The drug had been used before to target cancers. When doctors observed more patients “on medication” were being ransacked with aggressive tumours than those not on medications, the “cure” was shelved. That was back in the 1950’s. By the 1980’s and 90’s the drug’s onerous history had been long forgotten. It is difficult to determine whether HIV/AIDS “marketing” began before or after the introduction of AZT. Clearly mass Media promotion of the gay plague was geared to coerce potential sufferers (with flu symptoms) into reacting. That reaction would see prominent celebrities clambering for their predictive medications, not knowing that AZT was to be the deliverer of certain death. In other words, prominent gays were “set up” as bait to draw an unconscionable worldwide genocide campaign. This dereliction of compassion hasn’t stopped with civilians. Oh no! They’ve targeted the military too. Medications issued to first Gulf War combatants (protecting them against Saddam Hussain’s non-existent biological/chemical weapons) killed more than fifty thousand. That was the unofficial reason Timothy McVeigh attempted to attack an Oklahoma Federal Building in 1995.

According to Dr. Judy Mikovits (who once partnered with pandemic “point man” Anthony Fauci) the same basic clowns that ran the HIV pantomime call the shots for Coronavirus as well (not a direct quote). Gates’ contagion modelling effectively mimics the earlier approach to HIV (net product of a million “ever changing” theories-in-motion). The “powers” did permit a documentary on mainstream TV which has exposed the truth on how HIV came into being (piggybacking off polio vaccine), but no one lost anything as a result. Reflective honesty may have been applied to HIV, but knowledge on AZT and horrific symptoms of medications used on Gulf War veterans are the best kept secrets this side of Christendom. Praise those salaciously brave alternative Medias, because they’ve popped the smoking gun.  Your masters wouldn’t think twice about killing you; whether that is for money, the colonialist agenda or other reasons. In this instance, another reason I have identified is a commandment ordered by the Georgia Guidestones that amply fulfills the Gates’ family and other prominent personages’ passionate eugenics pact. To coin Henry Kissinger, it is a pact geared to permanently removing useless eaters from civilization. When active genocide proves too hard, the only other way to guarantee society is purified is by ensuring no more recruits are born. Why not mis-described sterilizing immunization? Is there a more effective way?

Advertisement

First HIV, then Ebollox, now Simpsons’ Coronavirus, What Next?

John Pilger, Noam Chomsky, and the entertaining Michael Parenti are blessed with happy mediums of being able to play and beat “the system” at its own game. Other public speaking majorities have been issued less fortunate demeanours. As with everyone else, they are held to ransom by educational/social programming enterprises that fundamentally dictate “the way things will be”. Hence, to all intents and purposes, that is why “the way things will be” is “the way things are”. I make no excuses for my lack of “viable” references and possible corresponding academic belligerence throughout this essay. I have found references are designed to more shore up political correctness or common authority views in substitution for actually verifying the truth. Thus, misconstrued empty promises, deceitful practices of all kinds and deliberate dishonesty are casually preserved over and over by those placed out of context, “value added” reframes. You know, “Ah, that’s how it happened!” So, putting it bluntly, I refuse to add to the malicious mass trend. As it stands, under review, the callous critic might unfairly revile content here. Given my express lack of formality, I would imagine this essay might be dressed as an opinion piece, which it is not. In fact dedicated readers will discover reasoned analysis that is mostly not tainted (God forbid) by occult “verification”. Nevertheless, raw evidence of science corruption (such as William W. Thompson’s fraud at the behest of Merck) is noteworthy enough to feature.

I guess the lesson here is, don’t necessarily “believe” what I or anyone else says. Do your own research, but make sure efforts are wide and thorough. It would be definitely worth everyone’s while to check out the great collection of topical writings at Pure Professional Journalism Gazette. Expect a bombshell by way of final conclusion that, to some degree, goes against background analysis. It will prove, if nothing else, I do not champion particular opinions and can turn on a penny in an instant if new findings justify the move. So, without further ado, let us begin. In the simplest of terms, our universe is exclusively composed of energy. In line, Einstein’s notorious E = MC² equation vaguely satisfies existence “the symptom”. However, was he to have delved deeper to substantiate motivated causes, his rudimentary oversimplification of truth would have been shown up as wildly incorrect. Our sun is one of millions beyond millions of stars that distribute energy throughout the universe. So potent is its source, ancient cultures worshiped the privilege of exposure. There may have actually been more to their zany practice, but I will discuss details onward. Back in 1918 mock scientists decided that the sun, consistently delivering life supporting “vitamin D”, was now the generator of a dreadful plague they labelled “Coronavirus”. Consideration behind labelling relied on judgemental “blame”, apparently devoid of any valid clinical research. The sun (an unreachable object) was inaccessible enough to make an easy unquestionable “decoy”, but, presuming the plague itself was neither fabrication nor “as described”, what mischief did it cover up?

This is an important question because 1918 marked the end of the culmination of a giant conflict between nations. So violently expansive was its course it has become known as the First World War. There are extensive records covering most apparent historic aspects, but it seems unlikely those deep, dark secrets held by “corridors of power” have been revealed (or why call them secrets?). Could there have been some sort of new manufacturing process or weaponry that caused more civilian or “friendly fire” casualty than benefit? Competent information supporting this inquiry is fairly essential, once basis for viruses (which were first categorised as such in the 1890’s) is understood. For journalists, audiences to disseminate information to can also prove pretty useful, so, in that regard, I run two Facebook pages. One is occupied by normal people whilst the other collects rebels with attitude, though sadly mostly without mitigated aims. The former is the more relevant to this exercise because “home channel” outpourings tend to accumulate “TV” world view on things in general. For instance, not a single person I have friended attached to the channel has any notion of what a virus “IS”. Actually, on that front, my other channel doesn’t fare much better either. Most presume origins of viral strains roughly mimic evolutionary course of bacterial infections.  This, by the way, is the grave error which aggressively fuels ignorant sentiment over speculative theories pertaining to Coronavirus and other less familiar complaints.

Clearly (by their vocal expressions) all innocently believe viruses are transmitted by humans to other humans, yet, if the truth was known, the notion would be deemed ironically preposterous. In fact (for those that bother to research) science has vaguely (hinted at in complicated waffle; if only they would listen to Richard Branson) “come clean” on things. Reading between those revealing science lines, viruses are the response of micro particles not-so-kindly provided by our atmosphere. Precise detail on exact “culprits” would be almost impossible to pinpoint. Nevertheless, after the last swine flu epidemic (from 30,000 flu screenings, the CDC formally identified roughly 20 complaints, but more on that in due course), logic proposes the specific root cause must have been from two giant farms in relatively close proximity to affliction zones or, rather, issues emanating from “lakes” of hog faecal waste (which is impolitely known as pig shit).

Many years ago I used to have greater confidence in “the system” and calculated the most reliable asset anyone could entertain was a jolly good lawyer. Mine was an interesting fellow; most senior in years. At one of our many meetings, he shocked by informing me his daughter was a nurse who tended to “AIDS patients” and she had accidentally lanced herself with a giant needle used on one of them. I didn’t go into details. Well, one wouldn’t, but some weeks hence I did inquire how his daughter was faring and, apparently, after numerous tests, she showed negative for both HIV and AIDS and was given a clean bill of health. Hoorah! If nothing else, this proves that HIV/AIDS does not mimic bacterial behaviour. But returning to those sciences’ “buried deep” truths, viruses are identified as having no metabolism. That might sound relatively unimportant to the non-technical person, so it would be wise of me to qualify magnitude here. The best efficient method of detecting whether someone is deceased (that’s dead) is by their absence of metabolism (which, I can add, promulgates growth). Viruses neither grow nor reproduce. They only change in character. Scientists label these changes “mutations”, which can be numerous. When particularly noticeable patterns emerge, results are qualified as “strains”. In fact, for the technically minded, science has never discovered a virus strain in isolation (except perhaps in the case of rabies, but I will elaborate more on that anomaly later in this article).

Given my storming revelation, how do medics categorically identify complaints, such as swine flu? Simply put, as viruses themselves prove too evasive, they apply a “microdot” antibody test. Under microscopic conditions, providing a million or more antibodies turn up at the “marked zone” results are regarded as sufficient evidence of viral infection. I am not sure how they manage to count all the particles efficiently, so I assume a machine does the leg work. Recurring biological patterns can be attributed to specific viruses in place of the “common cold”. “Next stage” Influenza is diagnosed by regularity of symptoms, which can develop into killer pneumonia. So, returning to my earlier “swine flu” highlight, it is vital to realise that none of the 20 or so cases assessed by CDC lab technicians’ revealed direct evidence of causes. Instead they relied on formulaic graphs tabled from symptoms. When a complaint was critical enough to lead to serious illness or death, it became posthumous basis for verification in lieu of actual, factual evidence. Putting it bluntly, universal “healthcare” is unable to fundamentally diagnose any virus (the burglar that’s never caught) or cause “with authority”. Hardly surprising as viruses are simply varied examples of how the body processes different types of pollutants.

I am being a little unfair to the medical people here. They discover more than antibodies in clinical samples. Resulting biological debris is presumed cause of disease.

Instances involving scenarios whereby “causes” have already invaded cells are harder to detect. For these, numerable sub-classifications, such as retrovirus, Flavivirus are assigned. To me, a word is a label and, hence, impotent terminologies rather obfuscate sincere revelation which can hinder dedicated investigation. Yet, the major elephant in the room that exposes medical ignorance here is its associated science is only able to speculate on how viruses enter the body. Back in 2018 I published an article titled “Coming Clean on Cancer” which highlighted the critical role quantum light (atoms) plays in cultivating body development. Because atoms are generally viewed as arbitrary or accidental building blocks of physicality, they have been more or less overlooked by all sciences. Well, that’s one reason. Intriguing studies such as kondo effect radically also demonstrate how far adrift atomic behaviour is from bubbling “science reality” (sic). Anyway, were we to understand the actual purpose (yay!) of particle waves, that ever familiar “survival of the fittest” paradigm we’ve been force fed would be rendered instantly obsolete. Survival does go some way to indicating truth though. By that vein, existence is built on principles of assimilation and, accordingly, all materials naturally recycle. Stronger animals consuming weaker ones enhances creation stratagem. In relation, I will reveal the “power” of quantum light soon, but now there is something much more fundamentally basic to adequately expose science misconception over viruses.

Unlike bacteria and fungi, viruses tend to be very small and, consequentially, are hard to see. Biological materials become jumbled and parts (without metabolism) congregate unhelpfully. Thus, under a microscope, it is a devil of a job to sort out the pieces of the puzzle. That is predominantly why medics substitute recognisable patterns in lieu of actual, factual evidence. So far, so good! Taking my “in brief” explanation of natural assimilation a step further, when microscopic extraneous matter attached to the atmosphere is inhaled or absorbed (through skin, eyes, etc.), logic dictates that the body would have three fundamental options in relation to dealing with the invisible invasion. Micro particles could be ignored as we overlook dust in our lounge rooms. There might be some kind of method to expel waste. The remaining choice left is to contain the problem. “Containment” conveniently fits the assimilation model like a glove. How does the expression go? “If the bear won’t come to the mountain, we will bring the mountain to the bear.” In this instance, to “contain” is to convert any invader into a new body part. Thus, micro particles that enter the pulmonary system are uniformly coated with biological materials by body defences to “mark” the threat. Some of these marked units are funnelled into various waste disposal facilities (such as kidneys, liver – hepatitis anyone?) over time. Others hang around to become part of the “biological scenery”.

It is these “rebels without causes” that can potentially fuse health issues (I introduce evidential effects of asbestos dust in a future segment). Remember, all the while, to the casual medical observer, they will appear as biological particles without metabolism. Current topical science assessment of data could not conjure more inaccurate prognoses, which bizarrely reminds me of the manner gravity is “dealt with”. On that subject, Newton, I fear,  worked out his proverbial apple was callously shoved to the ground by a complex web of forces (further explaining how our planet is really propelled) generated from the bowels of the Earth to bounce back off oceanic space. Maligned politics (covering up the fact our moon shouldn’t spin if it was a dead body?) determined to stem “inner Earth” exploration vouched for the vogue “magnetic pull” model. Unsurprisingly Newton’s patron, Sir Edmond Halley (comet discoverer), found no champions for his “inner sun” theory either. This should wax familiar because a lot of medical “science” follows political (Big Pharma friendly) interests. Gravity is not a magnetic field (although magnetism can influence forces) and viruses do not live. Thus, cells are never invaded by micro particles because they can’t be accessed in that manner. Instead, without exception, cells snack on tasty biological materials, such as essential minerals. However, rebel morsels are also eaten up in line with that common assimilation recycling strategy.

Ever had a bad chicken kebab? If not, take it from someone who has, you don’t want to go through the experience. Most kebabs are fine, and you can’t necessarily tell which ones are “off” from appearance, smell (particularly when doused in hot chilli sauce). But there are worse things to consume: strychnine, for instance. How does this compare with those doused micro particles? Well, as far as the cell is concerned there are no surprises inside each tasty package. Thus, in the case of SARS, ingested industrial composites stripped infected identities of nucleic acid. But there was some uplifting news associated with that. After all the credentialed science slander targeting 1960’s anti-theories, SARS once and for all proved a cell does not necessarily need a nucleus to function; launching Dr Bruce Lipton’s spectacular career. Aside from malfeasant politics, why would medicine make such fundamental errors of judgement in relation to viruses? The short answer to this belies the idiopathic principle grounding modern day healthcare. To explain, “Idio” stems from ancient Greek idios, meaning “denier of authority” (which evolved into the slur idiot). “Pathy” substitutes for suffering or illness, so the idiopathic principle (no known disease causes) remarks on symptoms.

In effect noticeable abnormality is treated in the hope problems will disappear. Sorry, I can’t resist a little sarcasm here. Golly gosh, in light of this course, who’d have guessed symptoms would make a nasty habit of recurring? Flu vaccination is therefore useless once genuine problem/cause is understood. On the positive side, bacterial parasites and fungi represent “symptom and cause” in combination so modern medicine generally provides excellent, efficient remedies here. Viruses, cancers and certain psychological conditions prove intellectually inaccessible. Whilst occasional anger directed at this deliberate medical ignorance or “void” is justified, we need to review the history of understanding of illness to fully appreciate why. We need to turn the clock back to the 1780’s to reconfigure a muted conspiracy that has always deliberately kept corporate healthcare in the dark. For instance, the real purposes for those enormous “inhumane” study schedules training doctors must endure is students are given no time to “think for themselves”. Brainwashed new recruits will memorise data “by rote”, perhaps in the same manner Islamic extremist “terrorists” are able to parrot the Koran, verse by verse until their minds recognise no contradicting sentiment. There sadly is a common arrogance too.

Now some might argue industrialisation commenced with the enormous cargoes of bounty that were transported in merchant ships out of the New World from the 1500’s onwards. However, for this investigation’s purposes heavy mining and late 18^th century beginnings of mechanical automation experimentation marked onset of the key “damage period”. Correspondingly, writers covering social matters of the era immediately raised alarms over noticeable effects of environmental pollution. These cries reached fever pitch by the mid 1800’s, which happened to “coincide” with mass production (as it was then) of vaccines. A few doctors spoke out against the popular flawed philosophy favouring “mild doses” [of disease] to bolster a body’s immune system to no avail. Just to be clear on facts here, unless I’m missing something, employment of vaccines will have no effect on inanimate (lacking metabolism) pollutants, so any healthcare benefit must be viewed as a form of placebo medication. Then, even after Louis Pasteur’s apparent death bed recantation, immunisation tradition continues as strong as ever today. Efficacy of vaccines has never been proven.

Those that study relevant data models observe that “introduction of serums” invariably happens at disease “burn out” stage (i.e. the problem was going away all by itself).

Mosquito man Bill Gates polio “gift” to the Indian hill tribes (and subsequent international class action suit) chillingly demonstrates how dangerous these products can be. Talking of polio, I would guess that radical downsizing of tin production was the catalyst for healthcare improvement, so it is not merely organic materials that can cause viruses. Bill Gates (evil computer genius), of course, was working closely with the CDC in their vain attempt to impose the contagion model for COVID-19 quarantine until the idea was quashed by America’s valiant surgeon general in favour of raw data evidence. How will they “fudge” results now? Anyway, let us imagine (after all that bad press), back in the 1800’s, industrialist merchant bankers were worried people might discover the truth and rise up against them. Hypothetically, wouldn’t their most effective primary strategy defending revolt be to deny pollution as cause of illness? In fact, contemporary mainstream academic reports and newspapers more or less followed these precise lines. Journalists claimed that weak and sickly would die anyway, so industrialisation was cleansing society by “making it stronger” (i.e. a macabre variant of survival of the fittest). That nonsense was fine and dandy until the first major [legitimate] epidemic eventuated (finding no credible voices to counter the glaringly indiscriminate targeting of weak and strong alike). The shock forced “powers” to employ a revolutionary medical strategy.

Potential for viruses was demonically ushered into being (and I say that because the devil is always in the detail). Idiopathic medicine, lost for causes, scratched around for the “best projections” to tackle “symptoms” and, hey presto, quackery came up with vaccines. There are numerous accounts of [presumed] airborne diseases prior to the 1800’s, but those varieties of influenza were most likely resulting from organic debris of one kind or another. I highlighted the dangers of pig faeces earlier. Unmanaged human waste I feel sure could be equally as negatively potent. Here associated myths accounting the sickly demise of society after Spanish capture (and subsequent garrotting) of Aztec monarch Montezuma II might well endorse my theory. Was incinerated bodily refuse the issue? Bonfires would doubtlessly create atmospheric conditions loaded with potentially infecting micro-sized carcinogens (remembering swine flu results from sun powered vapour emitted from sewage lakes). Identical reasoning can be used to justify analysis of other infectious conditions. Outlined in my prior release “Coming Clean on Cancer” Queen Mary I of England’s 1558 supposed womb cancer death is wrongly diagnosed, unless crude oil powered periodic combustible engines. Evidence validates automobile invention, development and subsequent mass production happening in much more recent times, thus the Tudor queen succumbed to some other complaint that may not be possible to find comparison for today.

We should be exceptionally sceptical and wary of all projections; Bill Gates’ inspired computer modelling in particular. Fantasy (and that’s what it is) representation of proscribed reality isn’t real. Facts considered carefully, immunisation philosophy and partnering vaccines are (at least at hubris) nothing short of trial and error concepts. Given the historic background, it is no irony that conceptualisation is “banking friendly”. Insurers rely on synthesised calculations to assess and best guess risk; risk that is unknown. Likewise, immunisation provides theoretical security as an insurance measure against disease. We are told “by the experts” to believe this security is impeccable. We are told it is a platform sturdy enough to support the weight of humanity. Practical evidence recounts a different, sorry story. Harking back to the heavily publicised resurgence of Ebola in Africa a couple of years ago, newly touted “outbreaks” took only moments to incubate. One instant everything was calm without discernible issue and next we were told of a “Jaws” style epidemic “of monumental proportions” in full swing. When a big storm starts brewing (a possible major reinsurance headache), onlookers are provided some warning. Reflecting on Media portrayal, surely new Ebola deserves to be remembered as the medical equivalent of blitzkrieg. In light of this, would not insurance class that specific speculative epidemic an act of God?

Acts of God are uninsurable because no preparations for defences can be made. How is it possible to immunise against a disease that is already rooted? Additionally, as immunisation principle bolsters the immune system by presenting mild dosages approximating targeted complaints, what warped philosophy could offer vaccine utilisation (i.e. “adding disease”) to stem contamination? “Ah, he’s lost a lot of blood, sir, I prescribe leeches”. I have already outlined why vaccines, at best, offer placebo measures against viruses. There is another observation in relation to contagion in general. I cannot fathom how a real epidemic could come along “without anyone noticing” so quickly. Thus, the whole current enterprise waxes false flag, I’m afraid. It is as if Ebola nonsense was a dry run to test population idiocy and, because Africans’ passed with flying colours, history has been allowed to repeat itself. Corresponding new normal (or that’s your friendly corporate “catchphrase”) recapitulation insists the entire globe has been instantly infected with Coronavirus (coming from nowhere for no discernible reasons); even though (for my research) limited numbers had been tested (at “newsbreak”) and the few deaths that have been reported are shall we say “dodgy”.

Fortunately I have friends in strategic places. A very alert Italian naturopathic doctor informed me (via a private network channel) that the grave situation in Italy “coincidentally” followed mandatory mass vaccinations.  Not quite “evidence”, but this piece alleges several Senegalese infants under care of a “western clinic” died instantly directly after being vaccinated against Coronavirus. We by no means share opinions, but Dr Judy Mikovits is one of those leading the charge against experimental “bat gnosis”. If COVID-19 is no different to ordinary influenza, would it be possible to confuse vaccine damage symptoms with those that might identify a new, previously unknown disease? Massive funds have been leveraged on Coronavirus. It must be a winner at any cost. Think the money to be made out of compliance and enforcement, plus all those potentially “justifiable” Big Brother measures. Idiopathic medicine, via spurious theories, can conjure “brands” out of any illnesses. Therefore, I fear South Koreans (another of those mandatory vaccination countries) will ultimately share the same fate as Italians unless I have read the politics wrongly. Aside from my dubious Senegalese reference, has anyone attempted to check whether there is a definite connection with Coronavirus deaths and immunization? We do know that Italian authorities pressed ahead with their draconian measures “regardless” of contradictions highlighted by a 2016 paper covering dangers of vaccines released by independent scientists.

From 100 serums tested (which, from memory, included tDap and MMR), roughly 30% were shown to contain significant traces of heavy metals (such as aluminium, mercury). I exampled effects of mercury laced bandages on fallen troops of the 1860’s American “Civil War” (war between dominions deliberately miscategorised?) in this article. Even so scientists that have studied data samples prefer aluminium toxicity as most likely cause of Alzheimer’s disease. That is the ostensive reason why cooking pans and soft drink cans are coated today, although I wonder whether “coatings” will eventually become classified as “cancer causing”. Logic supporting Italian authorities’ blatant rejection of evidence placing doubt on vaccine safety has never been effectively explained to me. Putting conspiracies to one side, presuming serum contamination was accidental with Coronavirus the symptom, have we seen comparable occurrences before? In answer, there is certainly one television documentary that examined evidence against tainted polio vaccines which were manufactured from the late 1950’s and throughout the early 1960’s. When adverse side effects became a noticeable problem, product was withdrawn from use in the first world (i.e. “Western countries”). However, as the documentary testifies, other stocks were still travelling to remote regions of Africa up until the 1980’s. According to the programme (which was certainly aired on mainstream channels in the UK and Australia), vaccine serums were originally cultivated in the kidneys of live chimpanzees and green monkeys.

These animals had apparently developed natural protection against atmospheric pollution and responding “viral strains” were unavoidably transferred to vaccine batches. In humans, reactive symptoms were labelled “HIV”.

I won’t bother introducing French/Swiss Nobel puppet and serial bloviator Dr “despicable” Montegnier (who never found HIV). Other “experts” originally described symptoms as “slightly worse than the common cold”. Misdirected propaganda (which unconfirmed “sources” tell me was brainchild of the CIA) promoted the idea of a worldwide “gay plague” on the back of contemporary medical discrepancy. In relation, I recommend Jon Rappoport’s sensational paperback “AIDS Inc.” will make an essential reference for those committed to discovering truth. Though I haven’t read the entire volume myself, some of Jon’s key findings are known to me. Most critical (in my opinion) of these points is information that evaluates the pharmaceutical drug AZT. Accordingly, AZT has had a very chequered history. Back in the 1950’s its prior branding was presented as a miracle chemo cure. Side effects were horrific enough for the drug to be quickly withdrawn without fuss. Patients implicated in trials had suffered AIDS like symptoms that were clearly not a parenthesis of cancer progression. Jon made other vital observations. His remarks on “science” behind benchmarking HIV are priceless. Hypocritical standards were so vague, the ardent academic would deem them perfunctory, but authorities didn’t give a damn. They were staring at one of the potentially largest commercial medical opportunities since Spanish influenza (some say coincided with construction of the electricity grid, but I’ll have more on that when I wrap this essay up). Whereas hard evidence supporting my proposed hypothetical would be difficult to amass, multi-faceted fear campaigns surrounding HIV/AIDS are legendary. Had agencies backing the CIA “gay plague” been given license to market misinformation, system-believing homosexuals of the time could have easily been lulled into investing in precautionary medication.

Of course, that’s precisely what happened with AZT, duly offered and snapped up under expectations of righteous “salvation” by those in the spotlight. Yet truth behind surrounding AIDS like symptoms was already long known. They already knew AZT was a failed chemo remedy, a reflective disaster area. Why offer a known killer drug as remedy for the common cold to sections of the population unless you were planning some sort of genocide or vertical population purge? Look, I haven’t bothered to check, but without doubt the medical gestapo will have recorded a rose tinted historic account of AZT (to match Thimerosal gibber), recognising only relatively minor adverse effects in persuasion of messianic commercial withdrawal.  I do check the CDC website periodically and, thus far, administrators have failed to see purpose in listing ingredients of vaccine “preservative” Thimerosal. They should because this is a product with an onerous medical history. Wikipedia’s account is reflectively erroneous for my research. Rather than preservative, it began as an experimental cancer vaccine in the 1930’s. Use was narrow and infrequent. Per later bedpan cleaning agent reclassification, stocks were deferred to hospital sterilisation and, after a decade or more of use; authorities grudgingly delisted the product when clinicians proved a definite link to pink’s disease back in the 1960’s.

I provide a more detailed history here, but “informed” need only review details of a few samples taken from Thimerosal’s ingredients list to be clear on why product issues keep recurring. The full composition’s a big cocktail, so I’ll head straight for those crucial elements to ease reading burden. Aluminium, mercury and formaldehyde (normally used as rat poison!) are the main offenders. That “heavy metals” presence in the 2016 Italian vaccines survey is now vilified. Mentioned earlier, consequences of aluminium and mercury poisoning are well known of course. Even so, there does seem to be a parallel imperceptible theme running here. Products that don’t work in one format are routinely ushered back in for other rounds. Mercury failed as bandages preservative, so it made a less than triumphant return in surgical cleaning powder form from the 1950’s. Perhaps comparably, “popular” Victorian period tonics that didn’t make the grade were sometimes converted into household sanitising agents. Tradition holds popular soft drink Coca-Cola began life as a floor detergent.

Given this pattern and because it was so chillingly efficient, logic presumes AZT will be the killer of choice for any planned population purges or would that be unacceptably blatant? Too many for comfort may have read Jon Rappoport’s illuminating volume “AIDS Inc.” (which is available on Amazon in the paperback version). For what other reason could have “authorities” removed his WordPress gazette? Maybe I’ve jumped too many steps ahead here for palatable accord to settle. How could America, with its massive welfare dependence (emphatically mocked by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu), employ an agenda aimed at killing off needy populations huddled beneath the Statue of Liberty? Though, there is unprecedented simmering conservative anger at political leniency given to illegal invaders from Latin countries (in particular) and this might well ignite civil rebellion. We have an unlikely comparison not too far away. Contrary to popular belief, Hilter’s involvement in German political affairs wasn’t a malfunction of the system. Indeed, any genuine researcher would struggle to find a bad speech recorded by the dictator. He eloquently matched Winston Churchill word for word.

I agree that notorious published volume “Mein Kampf” (My Life) has drawn criticism and some reviews state it was “poorly written”. Nevertheless, slander permitting, content is undeniably lucid and directives abhorrently clear. Hitler did not appear to like the Jews, but the only formal promise he made was to reduce Germany’s ethnic Slavs by half. By way of background on that, there were some immigration problems after the Great War (WWI) and Slavs took the brunt of social venom. Stalin’s infamous Russian “purges” largely targeted Coptic Christians (also Slavs) leaving an estimated 70-180 million dead (depending on which account is referenced).  Iran may be the source of Hitler’s favoured “Aryan” stock, but local populations were cut in half after a 1917-19 genocide claiming 10,000,000 lives which appears to be an inconsistency (if Hitler merely acted for a much higher authority agenda). However Genome batch comparisons of non-Arabic Iranians compare well with broad stock Caucasian Russians. Other than the premeditated genocide of American Indians, there have been no other population reduction efforts in the United States,. It is worth noting that Russia, prior to Bolshevism, ticked along with majority populaces dependent on the system. Indeed statistics detailing symptomatic effects of the collapse of any food supply chain loosely base predicted “panic [buying] after 3 days” on 1917 “revolution” records.

Interestingly enough, though it hasn’t collapsed yet, the essential supply chain jarred on the back of the Coronavirus “scare”. Why so quickly if the whole situation hadn’t been engineered? Shelves weren’t restocked following the foray, yet one prominent casualty “toilet rolls” is fully manufactured locally for the domestic market. There are plenty of Australian pulp mills too. If I might be permitted to use our supermarkets as the guide stamp here, main store chain Woolworths (a subsidiary of Walmart, I believe) has indefinitely (as of writing) ceased replenishing dried pasta and rice stocks. Backup Coles, clearly feeling the pinch, have provided small selections of rices (lacking popular basmati and jasmine varieties). An unrecognised “Italian” brand of pasta is the only one available and prices (for probable inferior product) have roughly trebled.  The phenomenon did not tarnish smaller private enterprises but, as with Coles, many have attempted to exploit the market to its limit. Perhaps too early to diagnose which direction commerce will take, but the current situation bears all the hallmarks of fabrication. For my research, panic buying generally commenced much later than is being promoted. Bare shelves encouraged the main “alarm” (which rapidly spread to smaller enterprises). Absence of restocks exacerbated the situation.

Obviously when nothing was to be found in the main stores, people “bought what they could” elsewhere, in some instances besieging micro businesses.  I interviewed a Chinese speciality shop owner who “couldn’t believe” how much rice she had sold.

Salesmen are necessary but expensive, so at times of general financial uncertainty or hardship that section of the job market retracts. Since significant drops after the 2007 “Grand Financial Crisis”, numbers have never bounced back to prior levels (or that’s my layman’s view). Personally, as one of the few honest business development professionals, my bleak employment period between 2010 and 2016 suffering “kangaroo starts” ever since, affirms the trend. Before Coronavirus went public, the Australia job market was in notable trouble. Now it is fair to say it has flopped. Labour buoyancy reflects financial optimism. Yet, since the demise of the gold standard (when promises no longer required backing), money has more or less entered the realms of fantasy (polite word for fiction). Prior to deregistration of constitutional monarchy (kings must remain accountable or face the wrath of the people, whereas governments risk only loss of votes) global funds were, without exception, sponsored by various royal exchequers. Now via tenuous arrangements with a worldwide body called “The Federal Reserve”, united governments borrow money from a cartel of international bankers. Each of these recognised governments is a registered, publically listed corporation. Given the fictitious status of money, if the plan is to ultimately “start afresh” (following the current state of theoretical chaos resulting from decades lacking transparency), simultaneously bankrupting every corporation (which would include government itself) is the one way change could be fairly engineered. Disbanded trading would require swift, radical measures approximating remedy (so as not to critically implode commerce, which theoretically transcends corporate edict). The well-established (CIA backed?) electronic platform Bitcoin might act as an effective interim solution, whereby voluntary assets could be reappraised and compensated on a “case by case” basis. A very visible queue of rebellious economists has anticipated an imminent universal currency meltdown for as long as I have been monitoring international politics. The manner these politics have unravelled in relation to Coronavirus projects “anything could happen right now”. Will supermarkets lay off staff due to shrinking revenues? Will stunted incomes promise even further shrinkage? Such occurrences in the United States would likely escalate into emergency government under President Trump (who’s reached the unlikely heights of issuing more faux pas’ than George Bush Junior) for a very long time.

Though my conclusions will determine Coronavirus is one of many staged civil interruptions to come, economic restructure from corporate ashes, ushering in standardised electronic money, will probably materialise as the “final gambit”. Moves to keep Trump (angel of death?) indefinitely in power are already being made, such as unrestricted relaxation of environmental protection protocols (which now will no longer be “enforced”). Have “the powers” that supposedly work in support of majority populations’ best interests totally lost their faculties with this measure? Pollution of the environment causes all viruses, including Coronavirus (if it exists, but more on that later), so shouldn’t relevant rules be tightened? On that point, once again, if it exists, from where did Coronavirus originate? Considering it is a global complaint, causal emissions must have percolated from “something” new that is “seen everywhere”.  The only two [publicised] recent “changes” that could feasibly (with stretched imaginations) fit the criteria are the “5G network” (I will focus on this “bombshell” in conclusions) and “Chemtrails”. Evidence says otherwise. Evidence points to fraud, but we shouldn’t ever be tempted to draw rash conclusions. We need to tirelessly sniff out possible worthy catalysts.

Legionnaire’s Disease is one such example as it provides a potential “common dominator” for all viruses. Not following traditional idiopathic etiquette, cause for this remarkable air-conditioning sponsored illness is known. Symptoms vitally not dissimilar to rabies, valiant research discovered microbes in the ground were active disease agents (I can’t say for certain whether these congregate to form fungal Legionella). Reflective protocols assure construction is now at “safe distances” from air cooling towers, but maybe that’s all changed under Trump’s toothless EPA.  There are many other alien complaints that have “sprung up” in recent times. Symptoms for HIV, Ebola, SARS, all those bird flus, swine flu and anything else I have missed do proffer commonality. All “epidemic” viruses of modern times have initially manifested as the common cold. Here we reach a focal junction. Common cold in examples highlighted evolves into something very nasty. However, I haven’t been able to ascertain whether critical escalations and complications (sometimes leading to death) happened before or after “medications” were administered.  We know categorically (thanks in part to revelations from clued up investigative reporter Jon Rappoport that early HIV “sufferers” were deliberately encouraged to take AZT in remedy of complaint. That medication causes AIDS. I find no argument to counter the plain fact AZT was administered to act as agent of death and I will have more to say on the implications, so stay tuned! To qualify, HIV, the illness, was never life threatening.

Extensive efforts to come to terms with likely sedition were eventually rewarded. It seems there are some Africans with good reason to believe the most recent “outbreak” of Ebola (affectionately paraphrased as “Ebollox” in grapevine communications) was entirely the fault of malignant medications given out to gullible people seeking solace for regular influenza.  If this is true, unlike drawn out cancers generated by AZT, whatever poison is being used does the job quickly, in maybe a few days. Were medication to be drafted in as “weapons of sorts” at some juncture, given the alleged prognosis, Ebola style treatments would be extraordinarily effective. So, that in mind, I think it is worth putting some more hypotheticals to the test. Is there corporate will to discriminately kill human beings? In answer, though no direct campaigns are visible, academia has warned of the potentially tragic effects of population overgrowth. Tradition holds Bill Gates father was a prominent supporter of the eugenics movement, but he’s not the only one by a long chalk. Doubtlessly political Media hysteria against “paedophilia” is one prong of the eugenics strategy. Sterilisation of branded populations has been historical ordained many times past. Concentrated efforts against Latin American nations are the tip of a giant iceberg. Then there is that strange remark Henry Kissinger made. What did he mean by “useless eaters”?

We have already witnessed carnage left by HIV/AIDS and Ebola, so that seems the best place to commence my hypothetical investigation. HIV was advertised, more or less from onset, as a sexual plague. Marketing fear campaigns targeted promiscuity.  Later the designer catchphrase “gay plague” came into being. Medias glibly informed audiences that it was believed that the plague had originated from Africa and scientists had almost pinpointed origins (which was an outright lie). In conjunction, they informed audiences, “the condition has been around for hundreds of years and is transmitted by green monkeys”. Vague on precisely how it was transmitted, we of course now understand polio vaccine serums were grown in the kidneys (which filter the blood) of chimpanzees and green monkeys and that is how scientists “identified” the precise origins of HIV. Though that bad vaccine was withdrawn from use against immunisation of Western populations, Africans weren’t so lucky. Perhaps lucrative IMF grants were offered as incentive to obedient nations, but it appears a relatively high percentage of contemporary African peoples had been given doses of HIV. HIV itself marked an ape’s [bodily] reaction to ever present industrial atmospheric pollution.

Medias didn’t stop at their own waffle on the subject. No, they enlisted the help of as many gay celebrities as they could muster. America’s Roc Hudson, Liberace, Britain’s Freddy Mercury and Kenny Everett all played their parts for the death rattle. They even paraded the great Cuban classical concert pianist Jorge Bolet for the “arts”. Obviously, certain luminaries were astute enough to slip the net, such as Sir Elton John, but many fell for the bullshit. How might that relate to Coronavirus? Well, we now have Royal Prince Charles who apparently “tested positive” to the virus. The “cause” must be desperate. Predictably recovered “virus survivor” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson had been rushed to intensive care on cue. Lights, camera, action! Now that’s leading by example, but more on those royal connections, in particular, I think is necessary here. It would be fair to say that, after Epstein, the fallout from allegations against Prince Andrew has rocked the British Royal Family. Whilst CIA asset Cathy O’Brien’s accusations were a near identically copy, provisioning a twenty year old “smear campaign” (which Wikipedia describes as “conspiracy theories”) against the Bushes, Medias seem to feel there is some truth in content this time round. In light of this and the record of Camilla Parker-Bowles’ promise that “royals will go to any lengths to support each other”, is the British Royal Family vulnerable enough to be blackmailed to take the heat off Prince Andrew? Moreover were the Bushes and Clintons being “held over a barrel” while in power? Either way, we can already see enlisting of unpaid (sic) B-grade celebrities “who wouldn’t lie about it” to push Coronavirus “credibility” over the line.

So where does Ebola fit into this hypothetical puzzle? Let us begin by considering possible parallels with Gulf War Syndrome. I have read estimates of anywhere from 30,000 to 300,000 veterans dying as a result of medications administered to protect against Saddam Hussein’s theoretical biological and chemical weapons. Historic account has not been able credibly back the theory, which is deemed erroneous, but that is beside the by. Drilling down and looking at related “causes of death”, many veterans appear to have succumbed to AIDS-like symptoms. The real reason (ignoring an alleged hand written confession paraded by certain vexatious Medias) Timothy McVeigh “attempted to” attack Oklahoma (note: according to prosecution data never used at the trial, experts determined a van full of explosives “at most” might have “broken a few windows”) was because of the manner veterans were treated up to and beyond their pharmaceutically sanctioned deaths. For the best of my research it seems a canopy of different types of drugs were able to induce AIDS-like symptoms, so if products like AZT were withdrawn to satisfy “public outcry”, we can ascertain there is a big queue of other notable offenders to bring in as replacements. A deeper question hovers over Gulf War Syndrome though. Is the condition a response to atmospheric or medical damage of troops? I haven’t formally found the answer to that one yet. Nevertheless, we have learned there are many, many options available for mitigated medical attacks on humanity. America’s “healthcare” system drugs kill anywhere between 100,000 and 2,000,000 annually (depending on which reports you refer to).

Whichever is correct, healthcare has proven far more effective at disposing of “useless eaters” than war.

I mentioned earlier that Ebola takes but a few days (at best) to finish off its victim compared to months of agony under the spell of AIDS. This is important for two main reasons. If the medical solution itself is the cause of Ebola (as some astute Africans swear), then active agent used must be different compared against drugs that trigger AIDS-like symptoms (supposedly caused by HIV). In addition, humanity could be disposed of very quickly was the desire for it to be so. So how does configured genocide relate to Ebola? After reviewing supporting background information carefully, there is enough inconsistency surrounding the history of the disease (if it is one) to raise alarm bells. Folklore attributing the “virus” dates back to 1976 when a new illness heralded from the Ebola River (which runs along the Republic of Congo). Western analysed and tabled symptoms did not come to light until 1989. On this point, I wrote an article a few years ago that highlighted a Council of Rome (the powerful masonic body) public meeting in New York. Some educated non-members attended and one of those reported what he had witnessed to select alternative Medias (mainstream concerns certainly wouldn’t want anything to do with him). The date of the event was sometime in 1988 and one of the startling subjects for open discussion (and organisers even put out to audience attendees for “ideas”) was the “best way to eradicate” giant chunks of the human population at large. Unsurprisingly, contamination of medications (or vaccines) was one of the popular responses.

Short of succumbing to Media hype over science hysteria, I am not going to be personally convinced there was a common connection between 1976 and 1989 Ebola. Origins of the “disease” come across as so tenuously vague; data reads in the same manner deliberate science dishonesty spread about HIV did. If one was forced to take positions on things, I suppose duly diligent could be persuaded the closest approximation to relative truth (based on findings in the public domain) is Ebola “may” be a bona fide disease, but probably isn’t and genuine origins are either concealed or alien. Back in 1983 or 1984 America’s State of Georgia received a gift from an anonymous (or so tradition upholds) donor. It is a large monument affectionately known as the “Guide Stones” which list a series of benchmarked future objective laws (?). The “law” that raises most eyebrows is “global populations shall not exceed 500,000,000” (or words to the effect). 1984 was the year autism was first independently categorised (but more on that in due course). 1985 saw the emergence of brand new HIV/AIDS. 1989 “the great threat” Ebola comes along (after never being witnessed prior in that format). It has all happened too quickly for there not to be a “common denominator”. Ever since we’ve had “waves” of designer illnesses leading up to ultra-critical reissued Coronavirus (if we believe the “experts”). The idea establishing Earth’s optimum human population at no greater than 500,000,000 is by no means unique. Swiss cult volunteers (who assert they are advised by extra-terrestrial Pleiadians) under Wikipedia friend (not branded a “nutter”, odd don’t you think?) Billy Meier included matching doctrine in their manifesto years before the Georgia Guide Stones were erected.

Here’s the clincher. According to statisticians, our global populations are snowballing at an unstoppably rapid rate. Such is the momentum a 10,000,000,000 milestone can’t be too far off. Allowing for big margins of error in social censuses, we may be closer to target today than is popularly recognised.  Thinking of possible common denominators I’m keeping an eye out for, the milestone would make a plausible candidate. Whether Ebola is a disease or something exacerbated by medications, the fact remains that official survival rates of sufferers are listed at an ominous 5% (last time I checked). It doesn’t take a degree qualified mathematician to join the dots here. Any “fool” can punch figures into a calculator to come up with 5% of 10,000,000,000 makes 500,000,000. And what a coincidence, for that was the magic number those Freie Interessengemeinschaft fur Grenz und Geistwswissenschaften und Ufologiestudien Guide Stones insist on. Actually, 500,000,000 is a maximum, so I feel sure whoever drafted the demand would sit more comfortably at 300-400,000,000 ideal levels. The expression “cast in stone” heralds from Biblical times, when “Laws of God” were frozen in time, tablet versions permanently preserved in granite. God’s demands were not open to negotiation (as is the case with everything today), by the way. Thus, if comparable metaphor applies to the Guide Stones, ensconced doctrine should be taken seriously. If conspiracy theories can be used to sink a prince, how much more power might be yielded by arcane dogma?

After processing the figures, leaving gossip for the tabloids, facts compel me to acknowledge there is a giant stumbling block inhibiting my hypothetical global purge of humanity. That said, in the course of my research, I comprehend why Victorian Benjamin Disraeli (according to Mark Twain) coined the phrase “there are lies, damned lies and then there are statistics”. My many and various attempts devoted to ascertaining the global death toll have failed to source anything concrete. No one seems to be able to provide adequate authority assessments on the subject. Annually death numbers probably range between 50,000,000 and 60,000,000 currently or that is as close as I can approximate. To me the amount seems a lot to deal with in one hit. On reflection, let us consider civil engineering’s radical but compelling response to propaganda that asserts 6.000.000 Jews perished under Hitler’s holocaust. Facts determine it would have taken too long to process bodies using standard facilities available (timeline estimates running to decades). Therefore, applying identical principle to the current hypothetical, if a global inoculation program was designated to kill all “useless eaters” in a few days, dead could not be treated effectively (criticism addressing poor infrastructure supplied to the 2005 New Orleans flood disaster is apt here). Resulting lack of sanitation would likely kill off decent percentages of “survivors” to add to the fray. I am unable to conjure any satisfactory scenarios that might justify “saving” present day mortuary workers from medical attack. Death rate figures I provided before were annual. Over a week, let us say 1,000.000 dead are processed globally in normal circumstances. Under terms of outlined hypothetical biological warfare, numbers just rose to 6,500,000,000 or more. That is a multiplier of 6,500 x current burden, and with only 5% of trained mortuary workers (of current levels) left to deal with the workload, unless “the powers” have gone totally bonkers, there is going to be no blitzkrieg medical attack on the people.

So, on the presumption that a radical mass poisoning campaign is not going to be implemented, why all the dry run plagues leading up to Coronavirus? Before I discuss associated multiple objectives, it is necessary to outline why, specifically, Coronavirus was chosen to mark the current campaign (which might end on May Day or this is what the government of Thailand suggested before imposing tyranny for another month). That original 1918 occurrence (blaming the sun “as cause”) offers no discernible link to our current “crisis”. Therefore, choice of name is intriguing unless it is code. Considering this, to any hardened political investigator potential meanings [of coded messages] are straightforward. The “sun” (corona) represents a form of Babylonian worship which was later converted into Catholicism (via a tributary of ancient Roman cult Sol Invictus). Embroiled symbolism here potentially covers a number of bases, but most likely refers to the powerful masonic order Babylonian Brotherhood that pays homage to sun God Ra. Corona (implying sun dedicated) positioned behind “virus” is corrupted in context, this duplicity is not malicious. No, it is a corruption with aims to uphold interests of the “Greater Good”. In other words Coronavirus is effectively a vengeance campaign for the Babylonian Brotherhood. “Self-proclaimed” Hebrew dissident Roy Tov favours the psy-op as preferred Pharisaic modus operandi. Lack of sick or dead under terms of pandemic, voracity of marketing efforts generating unpopular commercial side effects (such supermarket pricing games, restaurant closures), casual attitudes towards absurd austerity overwhelmingly confirms Coronavirus is an indisputable psy-op, regardless if its medical viability.

That considered, I am less inclined to factor in aggressive physical Babylonian Brotherhood involvement here, although stark connection between organised Vatican and United Nations “wellness” (sic) is demonstrably clear. Israel (home of the Pharisees) can be broken into “El”, “Ra” and “Is(is)”. Whilst information may appear inconsequential to these discussions on face value, one insightful satirical interpretation of meaning of the trio combination presents as follows. Simply, light and dark conspire to pull the wool over Gods eyes (expanding the metaphor, sheep, strangely, can be divided as lambs of God and sheeple). Proverbially, light signifies “knowingness” (logos) and darkness “ignorance” (scotia). Thus, per this deceitful tradition, knowingness may exploit ignorance and there is nothing God can do about it. Correspondingly, I doubt that the Jewish Passover was as described or even happened at the biblical location (Egypt) advertised. Does not Lambs blood potentially signify Chosen Ones’ (lambs of God) genetics? Of course “blood” is a term that might be also used to field genocide targets. In this respect, maligned intentions are sometimes so cleverly concealed, blemished celebratory historic accounts remain unaltered. An angel is a saviour, but angels of death are ones who masquerade as saviours. Remembering the exploited ignorance theme, under cover darkness is metaphor that denotes the commonest flaw of mankind: “time poor”, opinionated brethren too busy to commit to life lessons. Respectively, is it possible to adequately stir belief in a fictitious plague well enough that offerings of poison potion remedies are eagerly snapped up by flustered hypochondriacs? In tune with the scenario, toxins attack the blood, so protection offered to lambs of God would either be as a different type of potion or perhaps nothing at all (let us presume death angels were able to skip marked dwelling houses cunningly enough to avoid suspicious neighbours).

Were ancient peoples any different to our modern day lambs to the slaughter?

In short, could Coronavirus be something akin to the plague that sponsored the “Passover” all that time ago? As an intriguing side point, Persia/Iran offers a more ideal location for the Passover than Egypt, because prophecy bound Pharisees knew it was Magog that must fall to allow global totalitarian succession. Cunning fabrication is the surest means to ensure biblical prophecy comes to pass. Thinking about what’s happening today, I recall something about multiple plagues (HIV, Ebola, SARS, bird flu et al) paving the route to Scriptural peace on Earth, or was that Armageddon? Are the recent (deliberately laser ignited) devastating bushfires perceived to be symbolic holocausts or “mini-Armageddons” (to quote Benjamin Netanyahu)? There have been associated engineered historic conflicts as well. Two great wars have done nothing to dent human population expansion and, let’s be frank here; Vietnam marks the “death of honour”. No military campaign since has supported so much mutiny and dereliction of duty. Vietnam is the milestone reflecting a new era of irresponsibility. Regardless of this, war has proven an insufficient population reduction measure. People have simply been able to replicate too fast for the angel of death to keep pace. Now, given our staggering current population count, to adequately process numbers of dead bodies much faster than new crops are filtered into the system would place a strain on infrastructures. Sure, the mortuary business could expand, but not to the required levels. So, my good news is the “powers” do not plan to launch a globe wide holocaust, although tactical Armageddon might suffice if it was deemed feasible (note: underground bases were constructed as precursor to a zany formularised “alien assisted” gas attack, however living accommodations could not be sealed well enough to protect inhabitants long term). In practicality, there is a sole tenable solution to the population expansion problem. Great numbers of people must and will be sterilised. Attempts to encourage volunteers through contraception programs have not had the desired results and that draconian Chinese “one child” policy didn’t produce the goods either.

Sterilisation of populations at large could be actioned by either of two fundamental approaches. Sci-fi scale maybe, but it would be possible to contaminate breathable atmospheres serving major civil centres. Such ventures may well backfire though as gas unhelpfully tends not to discriminate between lambs of god and sheeple. Actually, another of those anti-Jewish holocaust arguments cites potentially fatal gas leaks. Now, to normal system-brainwashed folks the notion of alien assisted attack might come across as rather unbelievable. Some may go as far to enquire where evidence of universal atmosphere contamination or other ungodly practices have eventuated. Factoring the paranormal nature of machinations, it is possible effects are subtle. Therefore, in response to scepticism, though I lack anything cast iron to pinpoint and nothing obviously specific has been publicised (as far as I’m aware), there has been a miraculous human transformation in recent times. How recent is open to debate but change does coincide with the indigo child phenomenon. I don’t by any means suggest people have radically moved opinions as a consequence, but everyone is more open to investigating the truth in their limited capacity than they ever have been before. I suppose there is more uncertainty now as a consequence. Some even place faith in belief that the shift is “evidence” of ascension, but I feel the more profitable explanation is “atmospheric intervention”. You would have thought the “powers” would have wanted to test the scope of alien technologies before employing them “for real”, ideally something people wouldn’t notice as out-of-the-ordinary.

Moving away from subtle, there is also at least one academic paper recommending that catastrophic Christmas 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was engineered and, as such, an extra-terrestrial sponsored brainchild. Technical information provides detail theorising “unknowns” helped “detonate” a Sumatran underwater volcano to trigger the tsunami. Regardless of considered merit of alien sponsored atmospheric attacks, any “gambit” wouldn’t work when applied to mass sterilisation anyway. That leaves the medical option. According to Wikipedia “there is no ‘working’ sterilization pill”. I need to qualify academia’s statement. There is no known sterilisation pill, whereas an experimental drug is available that is believed to permanently sterilise humans [to the best of my information] without inducing other noteworthy side effects that might draw attention to its purpose. Could authorities “keep a lid” on wide use of invalid medications of this genre? To answer that we only need to refer to Thimerosal’s unjustified use in vaccines. Several excellent physicians (cut free of mainstream propaganda) have joined the eloquent Dr Andrew Wakefield, vigilantly persuaded to publically assert that “vaccines” are the cause of autism, but they are still relative “lone wolves” in the scheme of things. Wider populations are blissfully unaware of serious studies that determine very small amounts of aluminium may well attack the brain sufficiently to cause the effect (although other proponents argue mercury is detracting agent). Either way, Thimerosal contains both elements and predicable “vagueness” over its specific dates of usage in vaccines haunts mainstream “accountability”, thus obscuring definite timeline connections. As far as I can ascertain, the preservative may have undergone limited beta-testing from the mid 1980’s, but mass use began from 1989. Parent of severely autistic child, Robert De Niro’s 2016 video acknowledgement of the preservative mostly fell on deaf ears.

Historically, by the mid to late 1990’s large medical producers informally began to panic. Merck (manufacturers of MMR) consequentially commissioned a small team of scientists to test their vaccines with view to identifying connections with autism in African Americans (after they had presumably received complaints). William W. Thompson did find a link and Merck responded by asking him to destroy all data. Obviously, if there had been no discernible link, they would have published findings (and gloated about them to all and sundry). Thompson (I understand) had sufficient data to make analysis by 2001 but sat on the secret for fifteen years. Indeed the only reason he came out of the closet swinging sometime around 2015 or 2016 is because Merck attempted to fire him (or that’s the version of events I have been given). His threatened Media exposure of their mutual “secret” was, let’s face it, blackmail. Undeniable culprit, Eli Lily’s Thimerosal (the one film actor Robert De Niro singled out) is ultimately safeguarded below despicable double standards that define “common practices”. Medical producers deliberately cultivate contaminated products and their aligned unscrupulous scientists care nothing about the consequences. They care only about their own highly prized skins. Practicing doctors, burdened with enormous itineraries, are taught next to nothing about vaccine engineering. Therefore, before I go into product ingredient labelling, a little more history on the subject of medicine seems pertinent here.

Ever since the Catholic Church purged as many “witches” who could really cure illness as they could lay hands on (via successive inquisition waves), a void in respectful true medicine was left in their wake. Even so, it wasn’t too long before corporate healthcare turned up with infinite varieties of tonics (some based on Macbeth remedies), to be flogged by street corner merchants. These mixed tonics disappeared with the arrival of pharmaceutical cartels that imposed an industrial medicine regime fit for an industrial era. Dual mainstream healthcare options (to either poison or butcher) are today’s legacy. Alternative “choices”, such as acupuncture and faith healing, cast a pall over motivated discussions between inside professionals. Yet the greatest fear of the industrialist cartel is naturopathy, because this witch mimicking science is their greatest threat. Dr Robert Morse runs his cancer gauntlet well in the face of authority, but It came as no surprise to me when I learned that dozens of strategic American naturopaths had been reported as “dying in mysterious circumstances” over a relatively short space of time. More relevant to this article, figures in excess of 100 unexpected deaths of microbiologists were recorded in the 2000’s.

Were we to consider that Merck’s corrupt William W. Thompson was the exception rather than “the rule”, purges of scientists deemed risks to the progress of flawed medicine would be justified by maligned corporate interests. Key pharmaceutical “watchdog” CDC is a commercial operation. Putting them in charge of medical authenticity is akin appointing the local robber as your friendly bank manager. Old Pharisee trick of replacing all key decision makers with their own people appears to have infected healthcare in respect to microbiology. As an additional safeguard against rebellion, individual scientists might not necessarily be privy to which branded medications were fruits of their efforts. Thus, was a sterilisation serum or pill to be cultivated and “shelved”, nothing would hinder any senior stakeholder efforts towards reverse allocation. CEO of Merck Vaccines doesn’t care about knowledge of the known effects of Thimerosal in MMR, so It seems to me as though the higher up the ladder you ascend, the more the black heart of corrupt practices is exposed.

So, get used to the idea that forces of evil can masquerade product that enables their vicious agenda, in this case the potential sterilisation of the larger part of humanity under guise of “vaccination protection” against a future COVID-19 or some other bogus excuse.

I have had the opportunity to interview many common people about their opinions on Coronavirus. Only one had actually heard of the antibody test and none were able to tell the differences between viruses and bacterial diseases. So we are off to a bad start. Given the sensational title of this essay, some may be wondering why I termed Coronavirus “Simpsons’ Coronavirus”. To be honest, the influenza may as well be called Simpsons’ virus, but that would muck up masonic posterity. Let us never forget the 1918 version was blamed on the sun at a time when beach recreational needs may have hindered ambitions of able veterans designated to return to the workforce (or, to coin my affectionate pet name, slave-place). Odd too that Dean Koontz’ novel featuring biological warfare agent Wuhan 400 was published in 1981 (note: George Orwell published “1984” in 1948, the year Israel came into being again), but before I elaborate on how “cover story” viruses are transmitted (as we already now know all of them are caused by pollution), it is worth evaluating why popular primetime cartoon shows irregularly “predict” feature historic moments well ahead of time. The specific Simpsons episode I have been referring to, first aired in 1993, did aptly forecast US nationwide “panic” with corresponding run on food and other essentials. However, I am not sure whether mass hoarding in reality is as has been described by current “News” outlets. If anything The Simpsons’ lampoons “Faux News” (fantasy) reporting well, but corresponding truth suffers a horrible limp. I mean, that sensational computer glitch apparently affecting international trade sounds like a corny excuse to me.

I am aware of the Brad Pitt movie a couple of years back too, but Simpsons’ producers’ soothsaying does not stop at Coronavirus. In the 1980’s any notion of aristocratic “wide boy” Trump even making an appearance as a presidential candidate would have been unthinkable; the ultimate satire, yet, there he was on the Simpsons and now here he is, current president of the United States. Family Guy “divined” the Boston Bombing hoax.  And, yes it was a hoax unless the Gulf War veteran used as central figure had managed to grow back the legs he lost in Iraq, but don’t blame him. He’s done well out of it. Last time I checked, his personal charity had raised $1,000,000. Myself not believing in miracles, I proffer alternative reasoning as explanation for crystal ball cartoon programming. There is an expression used in sales called “priming”. The term is coined by executives explaining how they “set up” buyer expectations. Popular cartoons could be similarly used to prime audience expectations. “Oh, I already knew Trump was running for President. That’s not untoward. Now where did I hear that before?” Why did CIA personnel allegedly appear on the set of that cheesy Ebola movie (and Dustin Hoffmann didn’t save it, trust me) unless they anticipated “political” implications with respective content?

Use of celebrities in HIV/AIDS propaganda campaigns has already discussed, but I didn’t cover theories on how disease is transmitted. Back then, Princess Di was an angel of mercy doing all her wonderful work for “charities” until she was bumped off under suppressed orders of Prince Charles and the “royal household” (according to the Fayed family, at least). Are we witnessing karmic effect in motion? Prince Charles, of course, is the possible star “victim” of the current crisis (that is until influential Boris Johnson took the baton). I’ll offer odds of a million to the penny, there’ll be a royal comeback. Will the charade expand before cameras focused on Charles in the nick of time, providing him and many supporting cronies the opportunity to profoundly demonstrate everything’s okay just as it was with dear ol’ Boris? I see a planned fly on the wall series documenting every step of his medical recovery focusing on good vaccine “magic potions” all the while (reinforcing the green light approving mandatory mass sterilisation). Stretching my memory back, I recall Princess Di emphatically shaking an AIDS patient’s hand to prove it was “safe” to do so. But why would she need to do that for TV? In answer, I recommend everyone review Dustin Hoffmann’s valiant efforts to save the un-saveable. That awful Ebola movie he starred in “debated” prospects of airborne infections. Though conclusions, I vaguely recall, sort of left the question “open”, in science-speak any mention is a definite “no-no” (Dr Judy Mikovits is adamant about that). That’s why Princess Di, bless her heart, was drafted in to prove HIV/AIDS couldn’t be aerially transmitted. Ebola “in movie speak” was granted license to be passed from animal to human and then, human to human. We now know why everyone is obliged to heed the 1.5 metres social distancing nonsense associated with stemming the “spread” of (non-existent?) Coronavirus. Movie-land prepared us for the drill long ago. Major hidden purpose behind Princess Di’s antics should be as plain as day by now, but I’ll spell it out anyway.

The whole frickin’ agenda driving the virus ruse is to obscure the fact that industrialist pollution causes all illness that isn’t the fault of “parasites”, bacteria, fungi or mental problems. Viruses are not passed from animal to human and then on to other humans, but illusory science has successfully beguiled great and small into “believing” this is so. If “bird flu” is a genuine complaint, then logic persuades it is caused by vapour from relevant faecal waste. Are conglomerate chicken farms a relatively recent idea? In China and India, in particular, burgeoning populations have had the consequence of converging to such an extent their existence has conflicted with nature. Do viruses amount to side effects from this newly over impacted environment? Another possibility is generation of viruses didn’t happen overnight. Atmospheric particles may accumulate over decades or more, gradually building up to reach “critical mass”. Has the globe’s atmosphere already been “tipped” and that is why we are observing so many unheard of disease outcomes today? On this front, Suzy Hansen (a professed alien abductee) provides some illuminating insight in her first book, “The Dual Soul Connection”.

Industrial manufacturing is by no means the only mass polluter. The war machine arguably creates more havoc than all other detractors. Gulf War Syndrome is but one consequence. Iraqi cancer statistics went off the scale from the 1990’s onwards (for which Michael Parenti attributes President Clinton’s silent round the clock bombings of infrastructures as “culprit”), but Israel’s cancer rate has risen by 10% as well. World War One produced Coronavirus, but there were other less familiar complaints. It is estimated that millions died of tuberculosis in German World War Two concentration camps, but was it a real condition or were illnesses resulting from some unknown battle generated virus that produced tuberculosis-like symptoms (one 1990’s doctor described Ebola like tuberculosis on steroids)? I have highlighted many times before that arguably phoney Jewish “holocaust” (fast tracking recreation of Israel after Eisenhower’s laboured appeals) wallpapers over common issues that haunt most concentration camps. Miraculous success of placebo medications (something I’ll delve into in more detail later) confirms the power of the mind. In a sense concentration camps amply demonstrate the reverse quality.

Were any morals to be garnered as a consequence, “belief in success” undeniably aids cures, whereas “hopeless despair” can kill without remorse.

But there is more to it than that. Earlier in this article I stated human to human viral transfer would be deemed “ironically preposterous if the truth was known”. Truth sometimes appears stranger than fiction and this is one of those times. Living bodies are intrinsically connected via an invisible web. Related high energy emissions have been recognised by certain sciences. Contributing symptoms include chakras, kundalini and ectoplasm. I wrote an article about something called the “Tamarian” at my other website. In association scholars of ancient Atlantis determined everything that exists within our reality bandwidth (which perhaps extends to other dimensional windows) is interconnected via the quantum layer. Prehistoric knowledge is to some degree corroborated by the original designers of nuclear fusion who believed (prior to trials) the chain reaction “might collapse all matter”. That didn’t happen of course because a nuclear reaction creates an implosion which “blister seals” at source. We touched on social distancing a while back. I suggest 10,000 light years apart should be sufficient to guarantee “safety”. Unlikely clues to this reasoning can be found in horology, which is deeply misunderstood even by those that practice it.

Millions of years ago, all planets in Earth’s local vicinity were inhabited, but most had internal populations. In fact very few planets support external life, maybe around 50 in this universe, so it is remarkable that Earth, Mars and a small strip of land along Mercury’s equator have cultivated civilisations in such close proximity. Per these most ancient times, mass populaces had very little variance in character. If one societal member was aggressive, all members were aggressive. If one was a dreamer, so were the rest. Comparably, humanity is strongly diverse, arguably due to our hybrid status (symbolised by the twelve tribes of Israel). Every conscious being is metaphysically attached via the Tamarian at higher frequencies than mundane life. Spiritual beings develop energy vortices that are similar in format to the human kundalini. Indeed there are compelling theses supporting the idea, due to their genetic compatibility, that so-called “reptilian” higher entities are able to identify any specific kundalini and lock-on. Energy pulses don’t end at the body extremities or just beyond, No, they pulse right out to deep space. Thus, close by planets are proverbial steps on the way. Excessive quantities of similarly matched signals which collectively “group” will influence inhabitants of other planets “on route”. Horologists have inherited that legacy. “We are coming into the Mars aspect” literally means “this will be a period of Martian domination”.

Introducing SARS, I briefly referenced the fine work of Dr Bruce Lipton. He has revolutionised science opinion on how cells “work”, of course. Though findings show up as being predictably flawed, if truth was made an active benchmark, science has navigated perilously close to correctness along Lipton’s course. Tests done by Russian scientists to influence development of embryos somewhat affirm opinions. Using specific microwave frequencies, they were able to convince the foetal version of one creature to develop into a different species along valid birthed genetic tracts. I forget the examples of actual creatures involved, but, shall we say an assisted frog was able to develop into a snake whilst retaining parental features. There is a point to be made here and that is a body’s energy network interrogates its “environment” to instruct cells how to develop; a fact Lipton emphasises. Spiritual beings branch the phenomenon out to the emotional level, so if you (an emotional being) are surrounded by people who “feel down”, you will become depressed too. Women have been known to synchronise menstrual cycles. Therefore, equally, if everyone in the office comes down with flu, in all likelihood, you will as well. That is not through cause of “catching a disease”. Quite the reverse, instead your energy field reads “the environment” as sick, so it follows natural protocol. In short, all diseases at their root are effects of the mind, which proposes the great paradox. Most despised of all by mainstreamers, “faith healing” is the only valid form of medication. Confirming theory, many higher “alien” entities exclusively rely on energy systems to heal, assisted with various technologies (humorously spoofed by Star Trek’s Dr McCoy). Energy is used to fortify belief, so it follows placebo medications and Voodoo (genus of psy-op) work off the same basic principle; one for the positive, the other negative.

Though taking radically different exploratory routes to me, other alternative journalists have reached identical conclusions over this pandemic. In summary COVID-19, they determine, is common influenza. Indeed, early scare campaigns were run primarily in Europe with greatest numbers of dead coming out of Northern Italy (holding a concentration of Slavic populations – remembering Hitler’s promise). Italy had just gone through a program of mandatory vaccinations and this may or may not have had a bearing on figures. Did anyone check? The timing of the “outbreak” conveniently corresponded with European flu season, but even on the other side of the world “changes in weather” will induce increases in flu-like illnesses.  China and partnering slackly regulated Asian nations appear to suffer ongoing effects of pollution (historically London’s bronchitis contagion receded with the smog).  If I might reference Australia’s serious “commitment” to saving humanity here, whereas limited numbers of formal viral identifications exist, in “preparation” for disaster, tens of thousands of beds have been requisitioned across various hospitals. There would be some very red political faces if those dedicated wards weren’t filled to capacity. Presumably at least some other nations have followed suit.

For those that have made it this far, I had planned to embed a video treat, but unfortunately, after numerous web scrapes, YouTube yielded only one video (in German) that partially confirmed the virus/pollution connection. New York Times champion Dr Anthony Gauci (ex. mentor of Judy Mikovits and one of the prats behind the old de-funked HIV/AIDS blueprint) is “everywhere” unfortunately, but I’d like to hotlink this interesting podcast from a qualified doctor who helpfully puts my conclusions “in perspective”.

After that any doubt over COVID’19’s “status” should have evaporated. Whether there is any transparent basis to the attached malicious psy-op/misdirection campaign remains to be discerned. The manner “panic buying” was ill-described by mass Medias definitely affirms the dishonesty. In fact, lack of product on shelves is more the result of sabotaged supply chains than consumer greed. How is it when all residential toilet paper rolls are manufactured in Australia, shelves failed to have been replenished after the alleged buying frenzy? Did Australians use up all warehoused back up supply too? Subsequent rationing measures imposed were something akin to shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. No, it is obvious the “powers” intended to punish those who didn’t play along with their game, “hoarding on queue” and that is one reason why they didn’t replenished stocks. The other observed expectation was, when the shelves were noticeably emptying, some did react stupidly by purchasing as much as they could lay their hands on, but the main issue had always been the “broken” supply chain. Devastating effects of throttled supply is best remembered from 1870 Siege of Paris, but there are numerous other historic examples.  I know of no major supply chain breakdown that wasn’t politically engineered.

Thusly, ancient Greeks offered punishment of death to offenders.

Viruses are the evidence demonstrating how body cells deal with toxicity. Louis Pasteur knew this, because it was what his teacher (Bechamp) had taught him. His fabled deathbed recantation was never going to change history. Mainstreamers don’t remember it at all, so germs were eventually destined to morph into viruses. Was 1918 Coronavirus the earliest one on record? Not so this time, terminology first appearing about 1892, connected with tobacco I believe, but perhaps a fuller discovery tour would make an interesting future research project. Germs, as with viruses, are a very much unknown quantity. Pedestrian and scientist alike can only assume they are there by observing destructive symptoms; each telling a sorry tale. Yet there are clear clues apparent. Bacteria and fungi are never “caught in the act”, but their presence at the scene of the crime provides a precise indicator as to cause of problem. Using identical premises, logic promotes pig faeces as the cause of swine flu, but here we branch away from viewable bacteria/fungi. Instead a body’s vanguard protection coats all invading micro-particles with biological gloop (which acts as marker), so science will never uncover obscured hard evidence short of dissecting ambient matter. I doubt fine dust from asbestos that contaminates the lungs of breathers has been isolated, but symptoms highlight the staring culprit. Does not asbestos poisoning prove once and for all that disease can be airborne and delivered by local atmospheres?

Mustard gas used in World War One didn’t discriminate against those it ensnared and neither did fallen troops “catch” anything from their comrades. Likewise, everyone exposed to extreme levels of pollution (enough to overwhelm a body) will die as a direct response to atmospheric attack. Disease labelling doubles as a useful politically correct blame agent. On that front, if governments were supposedly responsible, why has America (in particular) relaxed all environmental laws to such an extent none are enforceable? Science and sane medicine knows that viruses are caused by environmental toxins so, if COVID-19 is a virus, then surely the American government intends to aggravate attacks on the human immune system. Why would they do that unless the aim was to accelerate seasonal “flu” complaints or, rather, COVID-19 attributed hospitalisations? And that seems a good point to pause and wrap up my essay with conclusions. In the final segment, I will discuss roles of nations in what appears a great population heist, exploring precursory implications for the future.

Outlines to shape the case that humanity has burgeoned to such an extent there are no effective means to kill off suitably large numbers of people quickly without “risking everything” have already been presented. Alternatives are straightforward. Sane “powers” have no option but to draft in mandatory (and, if necessary, forced) sterilisation. China did not furbish desired results under experimental “austere legislation” (ironically the soft option for humanity) which limited families to “one child”. Plunging the globe into [the first real] civil war would correspondingly risk total commerce meltdown (such as a rudimentary collapse of the slave network, sorry, I mean “workforce”). Therefore, to reinforce, feasibly the smoothest approach enabling desired outcomes would be to substitute sterilisation medication for, say, vaccines against future pandemics providing a lid could be kept on the secret until the dirty job was done. Next, to encourage participation from the masses, a “from all sides” promotional campaign raising awareness of a really nasty believable plague should suffice as “bait”. That said, the people won’t subscribe unless it was genuinely feared, of course. Required fear might be sanctioned by Voodoo techniques.  Were enough highly regarded social figures able to “hex” compellingly and often, everyone of “right mind” would be convinced. Without hard evidence to back up fear, hexing alone would not galvanise populations.

How to falsify evidence?

Outside China, alarm barely registered even though alleged avian flu death figures were greater than 1,000,000, so any calculated physical impact would have to be much more exaggerated to guarantee “panic” gripping the globe. I am thinking somewhere along the lines of 50,000,000 dead would be powerful enough for synthesis, though not so great an additional burden to “break” the system. 85.000.000 killed by “history’s nightmare” diphtheria (we’ll ignore the fact that happened in waves over decades); does not this emulate those levels? The remaining unanswered question pertains to whether stocks of Ebola “medications” are sufficient in quantity to satisfy demands. Presuming death rates do convince the people, phase two will be much harder to manage. Surely there is only one certain way not to indefinitely spook populations into noncompliance. In that regard, authoritative statisticians would need to raise alternative blame agents well ahead of time in case too many were sterilised too quickly, otherwise the “penny might drop” causing people to avoid pharmaceutical advice like the plague. I personally think, when push comes to shove, multi-pronged strategies offer the least hazardous recourse (for those evil masterminds). Correspondingly high enough percentages could be made infertile to substantially limit new crops, marginally satisfying the objective, with the greater remainder (of those destined for the knacker’s yard) given serums that ruin their immune systems. The beauty of doing it that way (as far as the establishment is concerned) is the sick won’t perish so fast, they clog funeral parlours. After it is all over, wouldn’t it be hilarious if paedophilia is legally encouraged “to rebuild populations”?

We now have a guide or map to chart tell-tale signs that mark plausible malice in motion. I have already outlined COVID-19 deaths [as alleged] followed mandatory vaccinations in Italy. Thus far, I don’t know “which” vaccines were involved, but would respective information (if it is tainted) tell us anything anyway? Ingredients can change “at the drop of a hat”, particularly when gaggles of politicians are desperate for propaganda feeds from crooked medical cartels. We are able to ascertain numbers of deaths in Northern Italy were relatively small (in the 100’s), but big enough to make headlines. Let’s face it, compared against those Chinese bird flu death stats (which received almost no attention in Australia lest we forget), COVID-19 has, thus far, proved a real “fizzer” – hardly “epidemic” material and definitely not a pandemic. Conclusions are straightforward here. It must be a training exercise and probably one of many to come until the “powers” feel confident enough to launch the campaign “for real”. Because it is a global concern, they will need a lot of support. History has demonstrated corrupt nations are quite happy to behave deceitfully. IMF grants backing the offensive against the spread of HIV in Asia and Africa were classic examples of this. Complicit doctors had been encouraged to list “AIDS” in place of “unknown causes” for death certificate records. Back in 1992 British tabloid “The Sun” published a tucked away morsel explaining “WHO estimates that less than 5% of AIDS deaths in Africa are genuine” (or words to the effect). Shock horror!

Philippines’ “old guard” are that deceitful they are regarded as “untrustworthy”, so America naturally turned to its Asian right hand South Korea in search of managed COVID-19 “evidence” (which comprised 100,000’s of screenings), well until that Bill Gates/CDC conspiracy collapsed. Meanwhile, other scientists not being referred to by the “powers” are determining that COVID-19 is no different to regular influenza. South Korea, interestingly enough, is another of those mandatory vaccines countries; anyone noticing a pattern here?  Forgive me for continually bringing up Hitler and “Mein Kampf”, but he did write “if you are going to tell a lie, make sure it is a big one. Tell it over and over and then people will be sure to believe it”. Consequentially my local mega-corporate supermarket, mega-corporate shopping centre and mega-corporate Telco’s (hold that thought) have decided they have the supreme right to regurgitate Australian healthcare misinformation about COVID-19. I will go so far as saying; I am being bombarded on all sides (and every time I catch a train) by parroted content identical misinformation. Now if that’s not telling a big lie over and over, I don’t know what is. I can say I have written about this style of practice before. Mass Medias find it common enterprise. A thousand “news” outlets duplicate the same basic piece of information using slightly different wordings to fake congruity. In fact, through all their smoke, you will struggle to find more than one fire source.

I mentioned before about scope for use of Voodoo in psy-op campaigns. Beyond shrieking standardised “government advice” on COVID-19, Corporate Sirens do nothing to help. But surely this evidences methodology fortifying planners’ attempts to facilitate worldwide programming of beliefs. From Caracas to Helsinki to Cape Town messaging is identical in character. When apparent “confirmation” of bad news comes in on all sides, wary instinct assumes “they can’t all be wrong”. For COVID-19 common fundamental “views” are being replicated. Ordinary people desperate to process what appears to be rigid consistency in support of the case for COVID-19 are naturally going to be lulled into making stark poor choices over and over again. But that’s not all. “Belligerent” Stockholm syndrome comes into play here. Gripes about open governmental dereliction of duty evaporate in the face of rigid patriotism. People quietly (or not-so-quietly) obsess over their need to be first accepted and then admired, loved even, by authority. Ensnared dearly seek safety under the corporate umbrella as “valued compliant (vices permitting) members of the in club”. People, one Pharmacologist friend chillingly informed me, “Want to believe….so they believe”. Hence Australians, in their precautionary response to “bad news”, were queuing up to give blood samples even before the panic had set in. If that is the example the rest of the world is following, God help us all.

Well, I thought we had reached the end of this journey, until new information came to light while processing the second text edit which changed everything. My original conclusive opinion was Coronavirus is a scam that piggyback’s off social fear staged at a time when influenza is prevalent. The “common” variety of that complaint was being used as a scapegoat to test best method of “herding populations” for a more serious future planned operation, which ultimately aims to sterilise 95% of human beings. I had written, “We should be exceptionally sceptical and wary of all projections; Bill Gates’ inspired computer modelling in particular. Fantasy (and that’s what it is) representation of proscribed reality isn’t real” and this has helped me reappraise conclusions. Attached to the warning, we learnt America’s surgeon general rejected Gates/CDC contagion (computer) modelling in favour of raw data. Literally as an aside, I introduced chemtrails and the 5G network as the only two eventualities “new” and broad enough to warrant consideration as cause of Coronavirus. Rejecting the notion of their actual involvement, I moved swiftly onto other considerations. It turns out I shouldn’t have been so swift. The reason Gate’s/CDC wanted to use the contagion model is clear. Primarily motive was to censor truth, but there was further potential for en masse vaccinations. In line, though after his disinfectant advice Trump, they tell me, is deemed less credible than Bernie Madoff, he did brag about great potential for “global immunization” a few months back. The bombshell that even surprised me is, whilst not “beyond a shadow of doubt”, concentration of COVID-19 positive tests eerily follow the American 5G network. As best “best guess” culprit circumstantial evidence more than adequately matches swine flu and those lakes of pig poop I introduced earlier.

Very much “hush, hush”, but the current crisis might be theoretically comparable to the Spanish Flu pandemic, which many (not aligned with mainstream diktat) have determined was fault of the [then] virgin electricity grid. Interesting that incidence began in 1918 yielding toll estimates in the range of 20-50,000,000 deaths. Remember that magic calculation I made as to volumes of fatality needed to justify hypothetical mandatory global “immunization”? 50,000,000 wasn’t it? And then we have another strange connection with year 1918. It is almost as though the powers attempt to “tell the truth” and “not so” simultaneously. They wouldn’t admit to knowledge of any link with their beloved 5G network ever, but it seems starkly clear why austere quarantine has dragged on and on and on with arguably no out of the ordinary (i.e. weak old people succumb to flu all the time) mass deaths. There have been poverty casualties and many suicides in Thailand thanks to the austerity, but less than two dozen COVID-19 fatalities (if we believe the statistics). Medication, hospital networks will testify, doesn’t discriminate, so how many COVID-19 deaths are actually results of improper medical treatment would be hard to quantify. Confirming my private predictions (gauging a change just beyond ANZAC Day), after no new positive test results, the Australian government has announced it is “very close to easing restrictions” (those annoying train broadcasts have already ceased) on its drip in the bucket populations. However for other first world countries, unless I have read the new (or was that the old?) game plan wrong, this psy-op could run on indefinitely, until sufficient numbers of dead materialise to justify next stage. En masse “civil disobedience” might throw a spanner in the works, but frankly phase two doesn’t really bear thinking about). I hope everyone gets the picture now.

The “Powers’” Great Accolade – “Brand Pedo”

Imagine, if you will, there existed a world populated only by biological automatons that were solely allowed to survive at the behest of a vague commercial bureaucracy. Because of this uncertainty, imagine if none of these automatons realised they were abject properties of a brutal federal control program. If the slave masters, the “authorities”, decided they desired to stamp their immense power over will, to “once and for all” demonstrate their authority over the slave classes, could they outlaw or remove all fluid or solid sustenance resources without losing or graphically impairing their prized stock? Could they make the air unfit for consumption or destroy all known shelter to stress their despotic ambition? No, the only the true liberty they could possibly take away without permanently impairing labour is “unnecessary” sexuality. That world does exist. It is planet Earth and the ignorant, naive biological automatons are human slaves; fodders dedicated for a system that deliberately transcends spiritual logic and reason in order to complete and maintain its program,

By corporate commercial determination, per “the program”, paedophilia is the root of all evil, and for reasons that so firmly contradict erudite populism, truth has become obsolete. The term paedophilia itself is nonsensical was it not for the fact that just about everyone has been radicalised into believing trappings of propaganda. So, going back to basics, it would be correct to start by analysing authentic etymology of terms in order to corroborate any coherent meanings. Only by careful analysis of the cold, dry facts can sound “basis” encapsulating the mainstreamers’ obtuse view be deciphered.

Paedophilia is a combination of two Greek words. One (paidos) means child and this is topically self-explanatory. The other, philos, calculates rather more problematic interpretation. Yes it translates to mean “love” as would be expected within the cognitive frame of child love. Nevertheless, the Greeks had three words (eros, agape and philos) to represent the emotion. Eros is used to convey an earthy erotic, sexual passion or lust. Agape is an emotional spiritual bond that perhaps might signify symptoms such as pity, togetherness or other deep soul connections (shall we say). Philos proposes a brave new world, one that is generally estranged from the Western concept of love. It is the Greeks’ “intellectual love” evocation and this might be best appraised as “to be on the same wavelength” (with others). Respect of a peer would make an acceptable version of the same concept.

Therefore paedophilia literally means “respect for children”, so how on earth did it translate into the ugly mess that has embraced the greatest of all modern day hysterias?

It seems likely (though I find no evidence of historic accountability) that the term was originally sponsored by those that formed special liaisons with children. It was a way of justifying engagements that might have otherwise been frowned upon by wider society. Promiscuity is a revelation of modern times, awoken by the 1960’s flower power sexual revolution. Prior to that lust outside marriage was a profound negative and “age restriction” on unions had been superficially imposed by religious authorities for so long that physical adult child pairings would have seemed unconscionable. This is not to say rules were not broken behind closed doors. Suffice to say, prior to the 1960’s suspicious borderline adult relationships would have had to have been considered lust free but always either plausibly “working towards marriage” or “undeniably platonic” for seemly social tolerance.

It was only after sexual revolution, political authority saw value in promoting homosexuality as a crass attempt to pervert all sexual relationships (i.e. by reversing principled traditionalism that defines sexual intercourse as a procreation precaution and not as a recreational tool, cultural insanity was born. Of course, this merely acts as a stepping stone towards outright control of the human mind – “you will behave as we say anytime we lecture you”). Thus those rabid synthesised outcries at phantom paedophilia are backed off strategized and scoped political support aimed at positively accelerating homosexual causes. “Contradictory” pederasty was most recently (1600’s onwards) adopted by the French (pederastie) from the Latin paederastia (Greek – paiderastia) and popularly translates to mean “lover of boys”.

Remarkable French piano prodigy and composer Camille Saint-Saens, a covert gay of the high Victorian period, once famously reported, “I am not a homosexual. I am a pederast”. This ironically demonstrates how much values have changed. Homosexuality was stigmatised because it was deeply hated (though undoubtedly egged on by political shit-stirrers) throughout cosmopolitan society and, therefore, illegal. Underage sex was not illegal, but because sex outside marriage was so universally chastised, “decent” normal folks would have found the practice unthinkable.

Even so Saint-Saens innocently reveals evidence of two streams of social conditioning. To admit to have been homosexual would have enraged retribution to beyond the pale so it was denied. Yet to confirm his overt but ambiguous paedophilia was the best way of diffusing allegations against him and shutting up critics. Of course there is much more to this tale (which circulated around his regular trips to Algeria – a place renowned for egregious sexual tolerance at the time). Saint-Saens cast himself as the paternal spirit ever excited by the ambitions of youthful innocent exuberance and not as a lecherous molester of children.

Ancient sexual roots of pederasty were neither explored nor acknowledged as relationships were symbolised as paternally platonic per the cultural view. However, the stem “erasty” is a version of erasthai (Latin) for which eros (Greek sexual love) is a derivative. This should emphasise the nonsense of modern times’ furore. If sex between adults and children was to be intimated by a slur, then pederasty is the ideal term. In fact, though it is believed to have originally been used to describe adult/minor homosexual trysts, the etymology is actually formally gender neutral. Does the “substitution” of paedophilia (in place of pederasty) not aptly highlight the wilful arrogance/ignorance of mainstreamers?

Many well founded information sources have come to light that broach the rather obvious homosexual connection to global control networks after Gary Allen’s tantalising volume “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” was published in 1972 (only a year before the Trilateral Commission was formed by late David Rockefeller). Those behind the eugenics movement aiming to radically reduce global populations have been implicated as players in the “program” many times. Whether this is true or not is open to debate, but philosophic motives are beyond argument.

If all population units were strictly homosexual, then procreation would require external management, perhaps offering theoretical provisos such as medical intervention to save humankind. Younger more fertile parents produce stronger offspring that live longer and this corroborates (though statistics are “contradictory”) a matched conspiracy. Paedophilia (younger, more fertile) has been outlawed whereas homosexuality (guaranteed infertile) is now both legal and encouraged (with initiatives such as sex change development offered to “asexual” [sic] children as young as four years old). Clearly all measures improve the ongoing population control/reduction agenda. I should add that whereas some institutionalised heterosexuals may argue they have a right to abolish repulsive homosexual practices, any [even justifiable] overt or covert despotism still prepares undeniable infringements against sovereign liberties.

Eugenics’ attack on the people has been unyielding. Wars used to be the preferred vehicle. Yet, as I write, the American “health system” (for instance) debatably shows up ten to a hundred times more effective at disposing of populations than war, depending on which statistics are favoured. Several drugs (including dozens of branded opiates) administered under the banner of “healthcare” are known to kill or impair life. The best reference is “auto-immune deficiency” so-called AIDS. Harmless retrovirus HIV was blamed for [known] effects caused by previously shelved (1950’s) chemo drug AZT. Naturally symptoms have been by no means limited to HIV “sufferers”. Timothy McVeigh’s foolhardy quest to bring down a building in Oklahoma City in 1995 was masterminded by the same powers he was attacking in defence of the “program”. They were behind the (at least) 50,000 AIDS related deaths of First Gulf “War” veterans. Ignorant conscripts were killed by their supposedly “protective” medications.

To be honest I believe the 1960’s flower power movement was a corporate inspiration too. Either that or corporates rode the coattails of the general erosion of faith in traditionalism (also a reaction to the distrust that blew over into anti-war mass desertions from Vietnam?). When did “the people” ever make any sincere [group] initiatives for themselves? I believe the powers wanted to introduce contraception universally. By that token, temporarily encouraging promiscuity was the only rational lever against the [Catholic] Church. Even so, to this day Catholicism has not bowed to Zionism on that level. The sexual revolution was predictably short lived. Prominent film stars, HIV and AIDS put a huge damper on any free thinking after the 1980’s.

It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world.

I haven’t personally referenced Jon Rappoport’s “AIDS Inc.” (1988) but I feel sure he will have delivered correct conclusions after reviewing his various websites. Paedophilia is also nothing short of a stagnant political move as are all other trappings designed to bolster the Eugenic movement’s determination to deny life. Forget the hotbed “abortion”. From the lofty position of purity, is not contraception the undeniable attempted murder of an unborn child? Given their Zionist-Bolshevik tactics, I would be very surprised if the visceral anti-abortion lobby is not another face of the same arbitrary plutocracy. When “they” decide they need to repopulate, anti-abortion will become the new flavour of the month. Currently abortion is a decoy that removes the sting from contraception.

Those demonstrably anti-paedophilia have been set up, applied more or less zero attention to the real issues. The shambles that is “organised” (a splintered, refracted mess) society is our testament. Rationalist Eckhart Tolle makes a surprising amount of sense in his claim that classical crusaders crusade merely for empowerment of their egos. I extend that philosophy somewhat and emphasise the bigger and more divisive the “cause” (sic), the greater the “individual” empowerment. There is no bigger cause than paedophilia currently. It is the mother of all causes today. Protesters, critics and complainers keep well clear of truth in order to preserve their egos. Maintaining the fantastical narrative line in deference to truth is the objective goal. Besides, if their “big issue” was to evaporate indefinitely, aimless lives would have nothing to bolster egos. Political spin, intricate make-believe dressed as truth has avowed the horrible “standards” that have cultured public infatuation.

Because the cultivation of biological automatons is the brainchild of the “program’s” covert marketing arm, Zionism (symbolising prison planet), there is almost absolute topical congruity between the mainstream and “alternative” press instruments. Alternatives also weave their own brands of make-believe and encourage that most foul of whimsical, plausible denials’ – “who to believe?” Indeed, as most independent or third party writers and journalists are incapable of doing much more than parroting or reacting against information issued by mainstream/alternative “authorities”, sanity has become wedged somewhere between a rock and a place beyond vital imagination. Even the great Jon Rappoport hasn’t ever dared offer paedophilia a fair birth from what I have read. Only an extraordinary journalistic genius with a death wish could and would religiously tackle this subject with unbiased sincerity. Like homosexuality in its wake, paedophilia now humbles the zealous.

Arguably everything political began with the collapse of Atlantis. After the Pharisees (the theoretical Atlantis “derelicts” Nicolai Levashov mentions in his illuminating book “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors”) conquered relative druidism 3,000 years ago, a globalist agenda has followed the uniform path towards the “program’s” unilateral attempt aimed at shaping all other creeds and cultures in its image. Permitting only Puritan adjusted worship is one of the many small steps aimed to configure that grand design. Sharia Law (a cauldron of intolerance; banning all manners of sexual expressions), incidentally, few seem to real realise, is iconic Zionist Law.

Political charades “for order” are exploited by puppeteers that use militant groups (deliberately formed for such purposes) such as “ISIS” and “Al Qaeda” to instil fear. Labelling of designate “children” (with 21 desired as the ideal age barrier) and applied sexual prohibition has been a long standing goal that heralds back to the Victorian era (and presumably prior). In some ways it surprises me that Gladstone did not realise the utopian objective back in the nineteenth century. Although with infant mortality prevalent and the need for fodder for wars to once and for all break the opposition in his time, outcomes and their contingencies have been predictable to say the least.

Maybe it was last year or perhaps the year before when I noticed a mainstream headline that poked me in the eye. It was significant enough to spur me to remove MSM as my default webpage. The article in question presented one of America’s provincial sheriffs’ who was voicing implausible concerns over a child rape trial. The “child”, at the time, had been seventeen years old. Two days before her eighteenth birthday, she had allegedly voluntarily engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse (statutory “rape”) with her [then] boyfriend. Only in America could a “trial” like that be “taken seriously”. But it does highlight the fact that the “program’s” zeal is all about fanatically vigilant oppressive power of order, bereft of sane judgement. Australia (where I live currently) handles these matters differently.

Over a decade ago a mature looking twelve year old, blonde haired girl produced a bouncing heir with her [also] underage boyfriend (if memory serves me right, he was fifteen). The sensational TV show “Current Affair” was all over the news like a baby’s rash. They “named and shamed” everyone they could collect until everyone associated turned bright purple and frothed at the mouth. Nothing was done about the couple because nothing could be done so, after the furore, everyone politely looked the way, except there was a sequel. The hapless girl dared produce a second sprog at age sixteen by the same father (this time presumably of father worthy age). Sacra-bleu!!!!! I hope the TV show paid her well. She deserved every cent. He was almost certainly jailed for twenty years or more.

There is actually quite a long history behind changing attitudes. Chronologies (were they to be read and digested) would go a long way to diffusing the sheer insanity that currently embroils the paedophilia “outrage”. Attitudes have, in some ways, remained the same but it is reflective contingences employed that have radically altered. Perhaps making the adolescent discovery tour “theoretical” has helped induce mesmerised masses. People’s inability to focus on anything in isolation (thus perpetually basing existence on generalities) appears to be the most devastating symptom of the “TV age”.

One could look back at the collapse of craft industries in favour of industrial commercialism as the beginning of the withering of independent mind [that worked off trial and error and, ultimately, questioned everything]. In the eighteen and nineteenth centuries there were occasional challengers. Disparate groups, such as the Luddites, did attempt to block imperial progress. Interestingly, prior to “industrialisation”, learning centres were almost exclusively used to prepare society’s elite classes. In fact, going much further back, I would argue it was only after the abolition of the mystery schools (run by the druids) in the Dark Ages that saw the shift from education to processed dogma learnt by rote as the staple for mainstream education.

Even those that complete a Master’s Degree today are given no marks for personal input beyond how it satisfies comprehension of “evidence”) (i.e. synthesised “worthy” information that has been rubber stamped by “credentialed” proscribed agents of globalism under the thumb). To which end eventually none dare question established “rules” which are actually beyond question. It is also duly noted that the precise same strategy has been used by political proponents that word laws governing paedophilia in ways to ensure any possible “right minded” intellectual protagonist’s challenge would be judged as spitefully ambiguous (at best). I find no evidence supporting rationale behind our current childhood threshold and can but assume the demonstrably baseless “18” figure was pulled out of thin air at the whim of some starched bureaucrat or other. Globalist hacks have been running “Holocaust style” attack campaigns against anyone that dare test viability ever since.

It was not that long ago when the age of [marital] consent was “12” (following ancient Roman tradition) in some US states and the European nation of Holland. America may be recognised as the modern day super power, but originally it was founded and developed as a formidable expansion of the Union of Jacob (or Great Britain), so the history of English law making plays extreme relevance to this debate. There was no legal age of consent until one of the British Middle Ages Kings decided to impose boundaries through fear that there would be no under limit to matrimonial alliances (or presumed sexual liaisons) with maidens. I am deliberately foggy on “which king” it was because I would like it to be Norman Jew William the Conqueror (who ushered in a “new age of [cloaked] Zionism”) as it does fit well with my overall patter. So if he’s the one, top marks for me.

Either way, for the best part of a millennium “the people” and their ruling powers had no objection to marital unions between de facto “adults” from age twelve. It was a king (the “contemporary” power) who had instigated radical new restrictions (be it conceived from ancient foundations) which also implies some marriages (prior to law) were made between parties (maidens specifically) aged less than twelve years. One would imagine that a small popular core would have always been against “young” marriages, whereas the majority must have been easy with whatever was the conventional norm. The perennial remainder (probably an equally distinct minority) are traditionally mostly shown as bloated cadaverous sorely vocal antagonists destined to bluster at first sight of illuminated “reasoning” by compilers of historic propagandas. Those that covet callous restrictions will do anything to preserve them.

In medieval times (as emphasised earlier) the age of consent strictly concerned marriage but did not place any focus on sexual activities outside matrimony. That was left to religion. Western religion is an adaptation of Roman paganism. Therefore when Christianity sprouted from the burning embers of Gnosticism, naturally austere (Pharisee promoted) rules were applied to marriages which ideally revered all lustful and licentious behaviours as “ungodly”. A functional allowance was made for purposes of procreation. Per this fashion, an adaptation of orthodox Jewish attire, the Christian bridal gown, attempted to limit “lustful” sexual intercourse between marital partners. Even so, for a great period (can anyone say with “authority” how long?) the proverbial line was drawn at age “12”.

So how has this ongoing “con operation” been run in a way to successfully beguile the madding masses? Today’s mental health institutions and asylums for the insane provide glimmers of insight. I determine that the profession’s handbook outlining three hundred or so “behavioural conditions” is simply an expansion of crass religious judgement as to what it is to be “good” or “evil”. Jon Rappoport regularly advises all behaviours classed as varied evidence of insanity are equally symptoms of normal behaviour. Evil (as termed) actions therefore are now indefinitely branded as manifest insanity. Modern society runs on adapted rules that are designed to obfuscate the truth, so while one could argue we are either “more” or “less” free than before, in principal only “terminologies” have changed and not the convictions that delivered them.

When the world was conquered in the 1650’s (capitalising on discoveries such as the United States of America), there was an uncomfortable transition from royal to civilian government power. The full changeover took about 300 years and today no royal wields any visible power. It was only after civilian government was firmly rooted that perceived social issues were targeted by the pariahs of control to facilitate their utopian dream agenda. Of course, the ideal policy (as far as they are concerned) is always eradication, but when (as is so often true) extreme measures fail, soft humanitarian ploys are stealthily drafted. Similar to current workings of political/legal administration, reasons behind tortured virtue offered as “grounds” rarely (if ever) matched true objectives behind schemes unveiled as “value solutions”.

High Victorian British politics eventually found a Prime Minister with the right measure of zealous hatred to tackle youth sex head on with a proverbial sledge hammer. Himself a reputed brothel crawler (and paedophile), William Gladstone first increased the age of consent to “15” in 1875. So foul was his hatred it inspired infection and; consequentially, he succeeded in raising “the bar” again to “16” by 1878. This did nothing to inhibit intimate relations with children, as evidenced in outpourings of diatribe over the plight of a pregnant provincial London prostitute aged ten in the early 1900’s. Whether the girl was anything more than a figment of the imagination remains to be proven. There are numerous other period artistic writings that might be sourced to highlight identical topical content.

Logic underpinning Gladstone’s reasoning behind the marital age of consent increases was null and void, more or less precisely equating to William the Conqueror’s war spoil “logic”. Age fifteen, and then sixteen, was simply deemed “young enough”. No science or consideration to individuals’ right to choose was applied or contemplated. Each was a corporate edict for the nonsense that is proscribed as the “greater good”. The same lack of basis was approximated in 2001 when Great Britain almost paved the way to the “program’s” supreme goal “21”. If legislation for the age of consent (now beyond marriage, of course) set at twenty one had passed, the rest of the world (an extension of Great Britain) would have been doomed to follow, eventually. In other words, legislations are arbitrary measures. Construction of a “group identity” model permitting only standardised values and behaviours for standardisation’s sake is the selfish result. Given the raft of evidence, even a slothful fool should determine this always has been (albeit in varied forms) the plan; though few “in power” would dare agree or admit to their repugnant deceitfulness.

The reason the powers have dimly promoted their numerous nurturing society “concepts” (even though society does anything but nurture) is messages are designed to make the opposite of truth “appear” truthful. In fact categorisation/classification of [designate] children supports a global social enslavement program (one of numbers of cultural adjustment frameworks that are currently processed simultaneously and connected via the World Wide Web and other international exchanges). In effect, each synthesised cycle is designed to break children into new gormless adult slaves as asset-worthy (“useful”) fodder to man the system. Per this design, children are instructed fantasy is more plausible than truth, though (thankfully) not every teacher plays dumb.

Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood.

Individuals (making up the majority) that are determined to be law abiding (patriotic) become effective prisoners in their own open society. Sexual repression invariably leads to differing communication problems between sexes and, to a certain degree, estranges relations. The miraculous presupposed instant transition from impertinent scripted childhood to “proficient” adulthood does not prepare the way for pretty society. Each new insolent, spoilt, self-centred, experience lacking generation of “adults” attempts to crudely push its way up the queue. Many have predictably abused their supposed “right” to say no and have been conditioned into thinking any (and all) natural sexual acts are “theoretical” forms of rape. Few adults will contend there are only determinations to be and no “rights” at all (a fact the “program” callously capitalises on).

Culturally male/female roles/mindsets have not kept pace with everything else that has been going on in the background (i.e. systemic shredding of individualistic natural sexual dignity). One consequence is men and women are still destined for classical marital unions (even if not in name). Men, per this profile, must seek sexual gratification and women should provide the opportunity (i.e. male hunters, female prey). However, because women now collaterally (i.e. “the great group”) envisage all sex acts as “potential” forms of rape, they have been given an enormous degrading power.

In their administrative capacity, they can permit undignified sexual acts with whomever they choose, when legitimate and “legal”. Downgraded social ethics have had the effect of dragging all women down to the realms of whoredom (or celibacy for dissenters). Any whore’s power is her “right” to administer sex “favours”. “Program” masters know this full well. Their “combobulation” child exploitation takes whoredom away from the spotlight. Thus, the modern day whore cannot traffic (an exploit variant) him or herself. He or she must traffic another or others. Prostitution, from the time it was labelled “the oldest profession”, has been effervescently legitimised. “Populist” anger has specifically shifted from attacking prostitution in general to the [predominantly phantom] child sex industry. This is not to say “decent society” is comfortable with prostitution, but affairs of the flesh do not antagonise in the way they used to.

Physiologically, the only morally valid justifications behind any prohibitions of sexual acts might be on grounds of “lack of fertility” or body “immaturity” (which would provide basis for the mother of debates if tackled sincerely). Those proven unfertile could be justifiably deemed sexually unaccountable and, providing “procreation” was seen as the only functional benchmark for that type of communication, it could be outlawed to satisfy the requirements range outlined. There is actually quite a big degree of variance in apt statistical data on this arena. The youngest “woman” (on record) ever to birth a child was aged six. Women, in general, may begin their menstrual cycles from about age nine. Men are late risers with the ability to ejaculate prevalent usually from about age thirteen. The youngest father (for my research) is listed as aged eleven.

According to “nature” (reflective of God), a sexual metamorphosis demonstrably takes place in women at age nine and men of age thirteen. Thus, an uncomfortable surplus of wilderness years in respect of current legal accountability should be duly noted. Wilderness years, in the case of women, number nine. For men there are five years. How is this legal accountability in any way, shape or form naturally legitimate? By the time an average woman turns eighteen half her life has been sexual. God’s blessing has been terrorised and abused by society’s ignorance and abject subservience to the “program”. Terrorist peers foist the consequences of their foul laws on the trembling masses producing barely a shudder of dissent. Yet all should be acutely aware that these measures are designed purely to degrade the majesty of sexual intercourse to further scope for the production of “efficient” human “automatons”. Killing off stagnant populations is a fringe benefit.

When a woman turns eighteen, psychologically, nothing changes. Her mindset is still the same as it was before. She had been sexual but to be sexual was to “sin” (a pharisaic Judaic preconception) and this was “forbidden” (fruit). She was sexual but, as nothing has actually changed, to be sexual now IS to “sin”. There is one difference and it’s a big one. It is the power of control. Before she could illegitimately offer sexual consent or forbidden fruit (opening the door to all sorts of nasty blackmail scenarios) and now she can legitimately grant sexual consent as the fruit is ripe (opening the door to all sorts of nasty “double standards”). This is how sexual women have been reduced to whoredom.

Men have paid the price too. The perverse game we call politics impinges on all male values. Those that are not avowed celibates are rapists-in-waiting. Under foul terms as these, any man that dares to succumb to sexual urges can and will be accused of theoretical rape. This is all courtesy of modern social-conditioning mechanisms geared to elevating fantasy. The average woman now believes she always has the “right” to determine which “rapes” are permissible. She can also change her mind. That is the modern woman’s “privilege”. Women that kowtow with the “program”, in deference to God, lampoon our most uncharitable, sacrilegious, sanctimonious system of order. It is a system that relies on the deceit, dishonesty and partisan biased judgement of its user base. Never forget, all laws polarise judgement.

The crux of the arguments (ever so rarely in plain sight) supporting age legislation tend to rely on [corrupt] academic standards as “justification” for categorisations in place. Never mentioned are the numerous early teens “prodigies” put through the university system early. These are the anomalies that frustrate the “program”. The maturity gap, when inspected in detail, is far larger than most would imagine. For example, in relatively recent times a six year old British boy was heralded as the new oils (painting) master. Back in the 1980’s a petulant pup became a self-made millionaire (when being a millionaire meant something) in computers before he had reached his tenth year.

Martha Argerich’s (a celebrated Argentine virtuoso) notorious 1949 first public performance of the piano solo of Beethoven’s first concerto when she was seven years old presents an interpretation that would put most adults to shame. There is an account of a nine year old girl who successful singlehandedly reared the surviving family for several weeks after her mother died. Only lack of money ultimately frustrated her course. Given these facts, age legislation is indisputably unfair. Why is it supported so widely and so staunchly by our trembling masses?

There is a simple answer sadly seemed beyond the lateral comprehension of ordinary folk. In fact the answer has already been substantively outlined. People are generally pathetically weak and lazy. The largest, most incessantly in focus voices always seem to grab the limelight, founding “opinions” as they go. Mass Medias, therefore, control the way people generally think. Yes there are occasional dissenters, but, generally speaking, mass Medias tend to push (control) the populist view. That is because supporting broadcasters employed by mass Medias are people too. Broadcasters are not significantly different to any average man on the street. They too are mostly weak and lazy and don’t like to think too deeply about “obvious” issues. Of course, on the other hand, if the majority mysteriously morphed into dissenters, mass Medias would disappear as fast as they appeared and the “program” would perhaps have to engage dogmatic religion to shore up cultural adjustments once more.

Weakness and laziness by themselves do not cement opinions that are used to back legislation, such as edicts supporting age restrictions. People act because they feel empowered by acting. There is a fundamental perceived payoff for parents that support the synthetic dividers separating proscribed “children” from “adults”. The payoff is controlling power. Being the boss or “king” must be regarded as the pinnacle of empowerment and, consequentially, families have been moulded into control hierarchies. Perhaps this has always been the case. For as long as historic memory records, periodic shifts to varied standards used to justify different age categorisations have been relatively seamless. That, by no stretch of the imagination, makes wrong “right”.

We must never underestimate conditioning mechanisms in the background geared to advancing false status-quo. Currently, each new crop of sexual children is deliberately immersed in cultures of facile restriction. Years long torment offers the vague promise of “freedom” (age eighteen “adulthood”). Developmental pressure builds from “terrible teens” to graduation. Many have willingly tried to believe in law and order to be patriotic (one of the group). They never rebelled. They never came to terms with what they had been denied. They never attempted to discover. Therefore, the majority of emerging and new adults bitterly support a terrorising system because they were “forced” into making sacrifice themselves.

In other words, pathetically weak adults will go to any lengths to wreak revenge on their kith and kin simply to appease their own failed ethical development. If you cannot honour yourself, how is it possible to behave responsibly to others? The great tragedy is [it seems] that people are incapable of recognising their sexuality or, to a greater degree, understanding how corporate interests stole their natural development. If age standards defining adulthood were radically shifted upwards to say forty years as the new age of consent, I do not believe there would be any major rebellion (after the first generation targeted was out of mind’s way). Old habits die hard, so I will concede the “powers” would have a hell of a marketing task ahead of them. How to convince all those marginalised people that merely want to behave naturally they are “wrong” to do so?

I have already outlined that British legislation tabled an increase to age twenty one in 2001, so why stop there? If the predominant cause behind age laws is nothing short of a population control/reduction measures, then (given the ever rising masses) logic suggests further increases are going to be ushered in. (Subtly ignoring the ethics nightmare exposing the true face of industrialism) China’s austere corporate experiment permitting only one child per family unit predictably failed dismally. Then again, if you can forbid sovereign adults “sexual license” by labelling them as “children” in legislation, the outlaw of procreation satisfies an expansion of the eugenics mantra. Ages twenty five and thirty marked traditional ancient Roman and Jewish commencement of maturity. Age fifty is of religious significance in Tibetan culture (and generally classed as the start of “middle age” in the west). Seventy five is another modern western classification milestone representing maturity or “old age”.

There potentially is no upper limit. Perhaps in the future sexual permits will be kept to octogenarians, the well-to-do that satisfy legal “exemptions” (loopholes) and “approved” (sanctioned) whores (to “service” the well-to-do)? Slavish automatons would do well to understand that each (fiendish) plan can only be stymied by the lack of faith of its designers. Confidence in communication is everything, but that is ultimately largely backed by compliance test initiatives. A sound pitch bolsters faith and the rest can be left to chance. What better target to exploit than “the family”? By turning corporate-political objectives into “family planning” advice, devious powers have cast a brilliant initiative. Families can now blame themselves for government issues and most will be oblivious to the fact. Admittedly a few have been waking up to the truth that “schooling” is actually social indoctrination in drag. But is this enough to spur momentum towards worldwide clear vision and outright revolution?

Times have changed greatly. In England years ago when attitudes were different, the age of consent was still sixteen. People could and did enter into marital unions at that age. These were normally sexual unions too. But that was trivial because teenagers (prevalently over twelve years old) also commonly interacted sexually. Legally underage pregnancies were unsurprisingly not particularly scarce. Ironically and sadly, the great “outrage” was against additional “family burden” as the young were obliged to be indoctrinated at school and few would have had the influence to earn “breadwinning money”. To me it shows just how pitifully inherently selfish people are. If only the vigour applied to blame and transference was directed at taking ownership of problems and compassionate dedication to delivery of lasting real solutions, then societies might be something to be proud of.

A long time ago, when I was fifteen, my mother asked my father to give me some sex advice. I vividly remember how he approached the cause. “You know all about it [sex], don’t you son?” He stammered, confidently. I nodded back wisely, as I had been the proud owner of a well-thumbed “hard core” adult magazine from age fourteen. Indeed, the pages were so well loved; they had come away from the staples in places. The point being is my father was too embarrassed to broach the subject of sex with me. It remained the unspoken understanding for as long as he lived. He used to use euphemisms like “it’s as easy as riding a bike” when he knew I kept damned well falling off. This is the norm, I’m told. Occasional controlling parents spew their ill-founded opinions. The rest offer silence when the silly puns run out.

Controlling parents aim to censor inappropriate behaviours. These might include masturbation in public. A Talmudic branch of Christianity called the Baptist Church (traditionally) labels masturbation a “sin”. Offspring of Baptist families are surely dealt all sorts of psychological blows unless they adjust to being exceptionally deceitful.  When I was very young I remember all the local kids in my playgroup used to occasionally interact with [vaguely sexual] truth or dare games. My own junior sister was particularly prolific in her formative years. We lived in a rural Jacobean period farmhouse which had a winding spiral staircase to the upper floors. Between beams my father had lodged makeshift cream chipboard panels to form walls and these made as excellent “scribbling” white boards.

One day, after a rather heated discussion with my mother, my sister (then age six) drew a biro cartoon of a “matchstick” couple copulating to prove she knew about sex. I am not sure it was a masterpiece but it was technically sufficient for the purposes under scrutiny, earning an immediate deletion under a double layer of white paint. Interestingly my mother never punished my sister for that and said nothing more on the subject. What could she be “punished” for? Knowing the truth? It seems fitting to roll out Krishna’s immoral quote (a regular visitor to this website) once more, “Spirituality brings to freedom whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What would Krishna have said about modern day paedophilia hysterics?

Perhaps it is no accident that the powers behind their mischief “program” sometimes refer to themselves as the Annunaki Brotherhood. The Order’s iconography depicts a thick braided cross trapped by an unbroken wicker circle. Cosmically, a cross represents path choices but the circle closes off any avenue of inquisitive exploration. The icon, therefore, is the “prison planet” or Zionism symbol. It sets paralysis standards (put into motion by pharisaic usurpers); the ones Krishna described as “evil”. Social paralysis begins with restriction of will [of the child] to confuse the mind (spiritual centre) in order to produce broken, de-spiritualised adults (slaves by any other name). To socially outlaw sexuality is to remove the most fundamental of all birth rights. Bodies without minds are only capable of following orders.

But there is more. Few are aware of the true potence of sexual self-esteem. Potent life is contained in the chakra governing the erogenous zones from conception. Those that deliberately superficially attack sexual developmental behaviour aim to create literal zombies – walking dead!

Callous Abuses of the Word Abuse

No one should honestly embrace this topic “in sincerity” without first addressing the greatest abuse of all current abuses: “paedophilia”. Perhaps it’s the circles I frequent, but I cannot fathom why more people don’t “get it”. Are you all so consumed with passion you cannot distinguish reliable information from the vagaries of conjecture? Jon Rappoport’s work on the disintegration of problem solving logic very much impinges on modern social conditioning, in my opinion.  Therefore, I plan to separately tackle the child designate sex issue head on, in isolation and as thoroughly as I am able. Be assured detail will be exquisite. A future release has already been part-scripted in essay form and aptly provisionally titled, “The Powers’ Proud Accolade: Brand Pedo”.

Few today (of correct age) would have the presence of mind to remember that the transition from homophobia to pedophobia began in the 1970’s, perhaps inspired by the sexual revolution a decade prior.  The “powers” were quick to action a remedy against that dissent (which included droves of AWOL’s from Vietnam), and how to impose sexual sobriety was one of the foundation stones laid in 1971-75 plans aimed at stemming aggressive independent cultures (cults) non-compliance with aggregate society. Multiculturalism synthetically imposing “common goals” was sure to vanquish any notion of social independence. It was no coincidence that Britain had set the precedent for total censorship of pictorial sexual literature after a number of successful prosecution outcomes against publisher David Gold in 1972. Under his new business partner, the desperately corrupt David Sullivan, their new marketing policy saw grossly misleading advertising fortuitously erupt into an explosion of sales of legal censored or “soft core” topical picture books and films. Arguably “smut’s” new found popularity had arisen as a symptom of burgeoning bohemian attitudes reacting against prohibition. For instance, the same thing happened after Mary Whitehouse successfully targeted schlock horror “B movies” in the 1980’s.

Behind the scenes (though nothing explicit was produced by Gold or Sullivan after the court losses) extremist sentiment against “hard core” pornography in general saw a misdirection campaign that strategically positioned child porn as the undeniable progressive pinnacle of perverse licentiousness.  Circular logic fused “thin end of the wedge” and “guilt by association” opinion to fan misguided and erroneous belief that all things illicit are “related” and virulently spread like cancers. Predictably absolute “resolution” determined anything pornographic must be forbidden to “cure” harmonious society. Conversely, attitudes were relaxing against salacious (one time pornographic) literatures, after a case against Penguin Books over publication of D H Lawrence’s “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” was overturned by the British courts in the 1960’s.

A pithy American current affair propaganda piece titled “The Children of God” (or something similar) made in 1971 (there have been several subsequent “documentaries” based on similar themes) ridiculed a network of community groups that called themselves The Family International (established in California by David Berg in 1968). According to the original documentary, ethics of the institution placed no age restrictions on sexual interaction between incestuous community members (a policy that radically changed in 1985). Production of pornographic literatures (examples offered were classed as child porn) was encouraged and sales were used to raise funds for the group. Unsurprisingly, film makers were only concerned with exposing perceived negatives and, beyond that, nothing was learned about the mission and ethos of The Family International. My personal research showed a number of cult members were pushed into suicide after trying to reintegrate into “closed minded” wider society before and after Berg’s (whose written legacy by no means identifies with vicious hysteria post documentary) death in 1994.

Homosexuality ran a different, though in some ways parallel, course, marked by virulent crusades against suspected public figures and all promotional publications. Throughout the 1970’s I would argue that it was viewed as a far greater social evil than paedophilia. Rather interestingly society’s whims so often seem adrift of reality. In more tolerant times, a relatively well publicised survey suggested roughly one in three males were clinical paedophiles. Other censuses have calculated one in five males showing bisexual tendencies. Personally I am inclined to take “statistics” with a big pinch of salt and that’s why I haven’t cited specific references. Even so, I am rather compelled to believe that the percentage of potential agitators for or against specific causes might disproportionately swell if people were a little more honest about themselves.

Attitudes didn’t relax against gay communities until well into the 1980’s. By the 1990’s AIDS (or gay plague) fear, mostly a misdirection campaign or scam, had reached fever pitch and this, I feel, was the cause of softened social attitudes towards the “plight of homosexual men” (in particular). However, in my opinion, had Bill Clinton (an alleged paedophile, by the way) not made it as President of the United States of America, the “changeover” (from homo to pedophobia) likely would not have happened. He began gay favourable rhetoric which laterally blossomed through corrupt [mainstream] Medias. His appointment of Janet Reno as head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) mandated radical development of a “Child porn entrapment market” as number one priority.

From around 1995 malignant advertising campaigns specifically targeted borderline adults as never before and these were accompanied by numerous arrests of teenagers and similar aged adults (i.e. 18-21) that had allegedly engaged in sexual acts. Those trading explicit visual materials depicting “teenagers” also came under scrutiny in a much bigger way than before.  Many arrests on the back of ignorantly innocent distribution networks included sensational pieces of “evidence”, such as a hard core stag film featuring an alleged fifteen year old Rob Lowe as “pizza boy”. Reno (who has been promoted as a “lover” of Mrs Clinton, also an alleged paedophile), incidentally, was the one that ordered the murder of innocent American citizens under the auspices of the 1993 FBI attack on the Dravidian (cult) community located at Waco Texas.

As mentioned earlier, I shall discuss the origins of the concept (and that’s all it is) paedophilia (which literally means to have an intellectual compatibility or love of children) in much more detail in the future. It will also give readers the opportunity to explore and evaluate some of the (inquisition style) tricks used to calculate confessions from targeted individuals or groups, manufacture the presumption of guilt “as charged” and regularly encourage bearers of false witness to commit perjury (in court). But, for now, I will only deal with that which is contextually related to the word “abuse”, which, I must say, in the context of paedophilia, is so vastly widespread, it may well serve evidence to justify multitudes of reports. The arbitrary nature of an inflexible (paralysis) and baseless (no scientific case) age of adulthood (currently set at eighteen, until the next foul referendum) should raise a cacophony of “destruction of liberty” alarm bells. I am fondly reminded of Krishna’s timelessly wise instruction, “The forces of evil paralyse”.

Perhaps anyone else would have said “sovereign choice” in place of liberty. However, sovereign individuality potentially conflicts with social liberty and the distorters of “abuse” know that all too well. Mankind is heading towards totalitarianism, the only utopian federal alternative to communion, at a rapid rate. There are two fundamental branches of the slave/master paradigm. One is labelled Fascism. This version of order is built on the premise that the fabric of commerce is strong enough to regulate social charters. Evidence might appear in the form of something like, shall we say, corporate responsibility whereby employee-slaves are both bound by “the law” and their company manifesto. Under Fascist totalitarianism, companies seeking new employees (of all rank) would rate assessment of authority documentation (official identification, police check, bankruptcy report and so on) as the most important stage of the internment process. Penal facilities would be outsourced and run by privateers. Marxism, the alternative totalitarian system, is very similar, except the social charter is administered by government and, consequentially, core business might be nationalised to compliment that seamless authority.

Sovereign individuals disrupt utopian society (per the Fascist/Marxist models). Societies are governed by standards and these might conceivably be eroded by abusers. Therefore, logically, abuse of the word abuse relies on the distortion of truth, which allows the marginalisation of social values geared to reducing sovereign choice in favour of social conditioning (i.e. only “choice” to conform and not to rebel). Society masters impose order on members by the same methods parents use to oppress children. In today’s society children are broken into conformation (to conform is the only “choice”) for what can become lifelong family feuds that are amply exploited by “authorities”. The regime treats its members with common impunity. Children are conditioned into responding to but not respecting family boundaries. So too society’s parts are tolerant but not understanding of individual prisoner status. Freedom is limited to “they tell me this is allowed”. Abuse has been distorted to vilify the authority against “that which isn’t allowed”. True violation is certainly secondary (a sort of bi-product) and mostly irrelevant beyond ramping up any case in favour of abuse stipulations.

The flawed logic of this philosophy doesn’t end there. If abuse is a symptom of that which defies freedom, our vile powers may as well argue they protect those locked up in prisons from the world at large. Under that premise, they would do detainees a great service. The whole foundation of abuse as a concept has been twisted to satisfy the crime (as it were) in this way. Expanding on my incarceration metaphor, it might be argued that though people may well be taken against their will, social disinfection actually serves the dual purpose of ensuring captive would-be criminals are locked into cramped cells “each for their own good”. The “powers” claim, therefore, incarceration is not “abuse”. Whereas currently, for my research, the justice system hasn’t made humanitarian assertions of this nature, it’s only a matter of time before it happens.

In the same manner sexually orientated child designates are persecuted under the guise of “protection”, the rules governing society transcend individual reasoning. The bi-product is an insanity which permits free thinking individuals can be stripped of all tenable rights and abused in spirit but not “under law”. Wayward laws were never in place to protect society, but rather to purge incongruous elements; those that choose to be different, set apart from the masses. A corresponding history of the delineation of order can be charted from the very cradle of civilisation. For the peoples of ancient Atlantis, administrative powers determined wrong doers should be scooped up and separated from the masses in order to purify society. Consequentially, prisoners (that were not routinely executed) were banished from their impenetrable towering citadel home.

After the collapse of Atlantis, roaming derelict tribes (prisoner outcasts) gradually re-civilised and this encouraged the consolidation of penal codes configured to administer secure wholesale capture and disposal of enemies. Today’s confinement model was the natural evolution of those haphazard reactionary origins. That is largely why the modern day “justice system” is terminally flawed. It was built on a framework geared to exclusively serving the “in-group”. Incidentally, our price busting “captive labour” prison system fits the Fascist corporate ordained order model like a glove. If those detained were classed as “privileged” (rescued) by the system, what would inhibit it from billing them full board over incarceration periods? In the future could everyone be forced into bonded labour to “cover penal charges”?

Governments, whether supporting Marxist or Fascist policy objectives, are exclusively in power to construct the framework or refinement of “order”. Manifestos are only delivered by governments and not created by them. Even so, given those ever teetering cyclic oscillations that divine the “power sharing” poled between aggressive conservative and leftist opinion making, manifestos are also “open” enough to permit “the law” and its administrational infrastructures change with the seasons.  Dramatic “anti-social” policy making relies on false flags to subvert rebellion. Complimenting this deception government backed terrorists are routinely commissioned to attack in ways that ensure sponsored solutions [to fictitious problems] are both feasible and “palatable”. Were any planes used in the so-called “9/11” attack or was Fascist “News’” “live cut” really a stage-play of pre-recorded enhanced special effects (or, in other words, government sponsored propaganda)? Reasoning determining these ongoing travesties against societies is almost identical to the philosophic candour that claims to justify the distorted abuse of “abuse”.

Fantasy is deemed more vital than reality in so much as nature and everything vibrantly natural has become the subliminally targeted enemy of the spinners of make-believe. They, as evidenced by their non-existent reasoning that has become the graduation of child status on ever more bodily adults, assures their followers that survival of power is the only real justification for all social considerations. For anyone that questions this “balance of power”, genetically modified organisms (GMO’s) are all about demonstrating the “machine” can conquer nature and (from the inspiration perspective) have nothing to do with the manufacture of goodness. Unforseen dietary advantages innocently improve “spin campaigns”. An expansion of this, should I call it, platform insists presumption of guilt defines society at large (per an expansion of unknown nationals or “Goyim’s” categorisation as strangers that are presumed “untrustworthy”), with exemptions given to the honourable or those with the right credentials (in the “family”). Thus, everyone of “file” is a potential prisoner-in-waiting when not of sufficient “rank”.  That is the primary reason why “abuse” has been distorted as a condition of that framework (i.e. behind “presumption of guilt” is the contamination assurance that an abuse has been committed).

With empirical clarity abuse is transformed into something material, solid, clear cut. It is something that can be tangibly used in a court of law. [Individual] circumstances become secondary, perhaps even arbitrary or elementary (i.e. if a “black and white” abuse has occurred; how are circumstances relevant?). In that fashion, any accusation becomes virulently more potent than all cohesive evidence backed defences (which risk being judged as excuses or hindrances). In other words, if “circumstances” are irrelevant, for abuse is abuse, then what is the purpose of evidence beyond obstructing the course of justice? Once an abuse is “agreed on”, all that’s needed is a wrongly done by claimant. That’s the lack of logic being applied here and that is why evidence is going to potentially obstruct the potency of any abuse claim (which must be true to be potent) under those farcical terms. Referring again to my mention of Jon Rappoport’s work, that is why the education system does everything and anything to block critical thinking. “Truth” is becoming so estranged from popular acumen; I fear it is threatened with extinction.

In fact immortalisation of distorted abuse is a feature of a watershed that is slowly but surely stripping away all sovereign rights. On this course when a “file” member thinks for himself it is potentially a most destructive act against the regime. Frankly put, the only way to possibly undermine the power brokers and their fraudulence passed off as “goodwill” is to outwit them. Therefore, I could well see critical thinkers labelled “terrorists” under threat of some capital offense or other at some juncture. Currently the Mental Health Act substitutes as the primary lateral filter. It has made damned sure that we no longer have the right to use our bodies in the way we decide. Examples to illustrate this include impingement on just about every functional aspect of life. We must wear clothes at all times except by arrangement when on private property. All bodily functions are limited in some way. I could focus on sexual reassignment of homosexuals, but the more obvious “for instance” is the denial of consenting sex between “minors” (i.e. all parties are legally underage).

To show just how fanatically lacking in conscience and common sense the powers’ lust for control has become, per their “abuse philosophy”, a statutory rape charge must be served on at least one party (all underage, per this example, let us not forget) when infractions occur. Thus, the justice system will determine at least one person has been abused whether claimed or not. To any reasoned thinker, potential consequences should be startlingly obvious. Predictably, there have been a number of judicial outcomes after no one embroiled agreed to being abused. In instances of this sort “the system” has been seen to judge everyone involved as having “raped each other”. How can that be? Is it possible for there to be perpetrators without victims or victims without perpetrators (depending on the legal insistence)? Surely this must be one of the best examples that conclusively demonstrate how unchallengeable validation of a concept can pervert reality.

There must be no doubt that corrupt goodwill does pervert reality and it causes all kinds of nasty chain reaction consequences. I plan to explore what motives are behind and ramifications result from circumcision in “The Powers Proud Accolade: Brand Pedo”. Recently a commenter on Jon Rappoport’s blog asked if I could include her feedback on the subject in one of my public writings. Presumably of Jewish ancestry, she reported her sibling’s circumcision had contributed to a painfully vicious hate/guilt cycle that has persisted to haunt the family relationship and, ultimately, befoul the lateral mother/son bonding process.

Men are considered (by the Pharisees) to have much stronger libidos than women, so males are circumcised shortly after birth. Contrary to popular opinion, Islam was created to radicalise Judaism (as “Christianity” had failed in the Pharisees’ utopian quest) and circumcises females as well (originally Muslim males were cut to honour the prophet). However, if the ceremony is done too early in the female’s case, it risks destroying all sexual self-esteem (leading to frigidity). Therefore the clitoris is partly removed from girls around age six. It is not fully extracted as the function of circumcision is merely to act as a masturbation (inappropriate lust) inhibitor and not to create permanent dysfunctional sexuality.

Fake “abuse” wields as much power as “blasphemy”. The very mention of it should send shivers down the spine and not for noble reasons. In fact in its current use it marks the total collapse of sanity. Abuse is a winner. It can hang a court. It has acted as anchor to all past and current inquisition movements, including the latest one used against Catholic priests, Jewish rabbis and others that dare inhibit Zionist order. Juries are marginalised, perhaps superfluous even, when presented accused are “certainly guilty” beyond any doubt without need of peer review.

From the provable “conspiratorial” angle I could argue there is a covert agenda geared to demeaning anything and everything that entitles communion. This, by extension, distorts purposeful living into desecration. Underpinned by many unwelcome corporate compliance terms, whether delivered through the private sector or “government”, the final step has been to vilify slavery (dressed as “employment”) as the fundamental point of vocational existence. Bearing in mind the “contract” everyone makes with God prior to coming into the world is to balance “living life to the max” and “revering the body as the temple”, real abuse, real violation has been mutated into something beautifully sacred. The powers’ grand coup, great deception against the peoples’ contract with God could not be more amply highlighted than by outlining how religions scammed “beliefs”.

Religions gave “God” a voice and it was a remarkable revolution, because God never actually said anything and none dare question what wasn’t said. In precisely the same way shadow powers execute government, the Pharisees control all religions today and the basic “blasphemy” indoctrination has been incorporated into Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism. Perhaps there’s the odd tribal culture “exception” saved by lack of popularity, but the rationalisation has predominantly been a global one. “God” has also been incorporated into civil law federally, so religions have served their purpose and cease to be explicitly necessary. Through those wonderful pharisaic ideologists, God talks in mysterious ways. Mass indoctrination continues, unaltered by atheism, unhampered and never erring in the deliverance of the never spoken word.

Of course, everyone “should” know the “word of God” is actually bullshit and “God’s values” are actually the Pharisees’ Laws. The real God talks through nature and that’s why they (the shadow powers) attack any known pantheist cult, attempt to destroy natural foods (supress organic, flood GMO’s), aggressively sponsor sexual “reassignment” and support, impose anything else that is sure to give nature a whack in the nose. Those believed-to-be vigilant “forces for light” (euphemistically calling themselves Truthers) couldn’t discover the “truth” if they tripped over it. Their spiteful and pointless crusade against phantom “Illuminati” power has failed to get close to coming to terms with the real evil doers and their so-called “Luciferian Doctrine”. Illuminati occultists (hidden ones) have scripted the greatest violation, abuse imaginable. The ultimate goal is poison the planet whilst “undoing nature” in an agenda determined to reduce humanity to abject trans-humanism, a globe populated by living robots if you will.

Everyone seems to go along with the plan, blindly and ignorantly. The few that become aware do nothing meaningful to inhibit destruction in motion. Babbling do-gooders assume if it “ain’t noticeably broken, why fix it?” People culturally attune and do their upmost to maintain their selfishly favourable status quos for as long as they persist. Conversely, those that dare challenge their “hard earned”, wilfully fickle resources are despised. Per this haughty arrogance, ones that beg for support “must be” inferior parasites of the lowest character. How dare they abuse us by “expecting” donations and other spiritually draining demands? It’s not only the “powers” that callously abuse the word “abuse”. You all do.

Me Playing for my Supper

 

 

Donations Welcome