The “Powers’” Great Accolade – “Brand Pedo”

Imagine, if you will, there existed a world populated only by biological automatons that were solely allowed to survive at the behest of a vague commercial bureaucracy. Because of this uncertainty, imagine if none of these automatons realised they were abject properties of a brutal federal control program. If the slave masters, the “authorities”, decided they desired to stamp their immense power over will, to “once and for all” demonstrate their authority over the slave classes, could they outlaw or remove all fluid or solid sustenance resources without losing or graphically impairing their prized stock? Could they make the air unfit for consumption or destroy all known shelter to stress their despotic ambition? No, the only the true liberty they could possibly take away without permanently impairing labour is “unnecessarysexuality. That world does exist. It is planet Earth and the ignorant, naive biological automatons are human slaves; fodders dedicated for a system that deliberately transcends spiritual logic and reason in order to complete and maintain its program,

By corporate commercial determination, per “the program”, paedophilia is the root of all evil, and for reasons that so firmly contradict erudite populism, truth has become obsolete. The term paedophilia itself is nonsensical was it not for the fact that just about everyone has been radicalised into believing trappings of propaganda. So, going back to basics, it would be correct to start by analysing authentic etymology of terms in order to corroborate any coherent meanings. Only by careful analysis of the cold, dry facts can sound “basis” encapsulating the mainstreamers’ obtuse view be deciphered.

Paedophilia is a combination of two Greek words. One (paidos) means child and this is topically self-explanatory. The other, philos, calculates rather more problematic interpretation. Yes it translates to mean “love” as would be expected within the cognitive frame of child love. Nevertheless, the Greeks had three words (eros, agape and philos) to represent the emotion. Eros is used to convey an earthy erotic, sexual passion or lust. Agape is an emotional spiritual bond that perhaps might signify symptoms such as pity, togetherness or other deep soul connections (shall we say). Philos proposes a brave new world, one that is generally estranged from the Western concept of love. It is the Greeks’ “intellectual love” evocation and this might be best appraised as “to be on the same wavelength” (with others). Respect of a peer would make an acceptable version of the same concept.

Therefore paedophilia literally means “respect for children”, so how on earth did it translate into the ugly mess that has embraced the greatest of all modern day hysterias?

It seems likely (though I find no evidence of historic accountability) that the term was originally sponsored by those that formed special liaisons with children. It was a way of justifying engagements that might have otherwise been frowned upon by wider society. Promiscuity is a revelation of modern times, awoken by the 1960’s flower power sexual revolution. Prior to that lust outside marriage was a profound negative and “age restriction” on unions had been superficially imposed by religious authorities for so long that physical adult child pairings would have seemed unconscionable. This is not to say rules were not broken behind closed doors. Suffice to say, prior to the 1960’s suspicious borderline adult relationships would have had to have been considered lust free but always either plausibly “working towards marriage” or “undeniably platonic” for seemly social tolerance.

It was only after sexual revolution, political authority saw value in promoting homosexuality as a crass attempt to pervert all sexual relationships (i.e. by reversing principled traditionalism that defines sexual intercourse as a procreation precaution and not as a recreational tool, cultural insanity was born. Of course, this merely acts as a stepping stone towards outright control of the human mind – “you will behave as we say anytime we lecture you”). Thus those rabid synthesised outcries at phantom paedophilia are backed off strategized and scoped political support aimed at positively accelerating homosexual causes. “Contradictory” pederasty was most recently (1600’s onwards) adopted by the French (pederastie) from the Latin paederastia (Greek – paiderastia) and popularly translates to mean “lover of boys”.

Remarkable French piano prodigy and composer Camille Saint-Saens, a covert gay of the high Victorian period, once famously reported, “I am not a homosexual. I am a pederast”. This ironically demonstrates how much values have changed. Homosexuality was stigmatised because it was deeply hated (though undoubtedly egged on by political shit-stirrers) throughout cosmopolitan society and, therefore, illegal. Underage sex was not illegal, but because sex outside marriage was so universally chastised, “decent” normal folks would have found the practice unthinkable.

Even so Saint-Saens innocently reveals evidence of two streams of social conditioning. To admit to have been homosexual would have enraged retribution to beyond the pale so it was denied. Yet to confirm his overt but ambiguous paedophilia was the best way of diffusing allegations against him and shutting up critics. Of course there is much more to this tale (which circulated around his regular trips to Algeria – a place renowned for egregious sexual tolerance at the time). Saint-Saens cast himself as the paternal spirit ever excited by the ambitions of youthful innocent exuberance and not as a lecherous molester of children.

Ancient sexual roots of pederasty were neither explored nor acknowledged as relationships were symbolised as paternally platonic per the cultural view. However, the stem “erasty” is a version of erasthai (Latin) for which eros (Greek sexual love) is a derivative. This should emphasise the nonsense of modern times’ furore. If sex between adults and children was to be intimated by a slur, then pederasty is the ideal term. In fact, though it is believed to have originally been used to describe adult/minor homosexual trysts, the etymology is actually formally gender neutral. Does the “substitution” of paedophilia (in place of pederasty) not aptly highlight the wilful arrogance/ignorance of mainstreamers?

Many well founded information sources have come to light that broach the rather obvious homosexual connection to global control networks after Gary Allen’s tantalising volume “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” was published in 1972 (only a year before the Trilateral Commission was formed by late David Rockefeller). Those behind the eugenics movement aiming to radically reduce global populations have been implicated as players in the “program” many times. Whether this is true or not is open to debate, but philosophic motives are beyond argument.

If all population units were strictly homosexual, then procreation would require external management, perhaps offering theoretical provisos such as medical intervention to save humankind. Younger more fertile parents produce stronger offspring that live longer and this corroborates (though statistics are “contradictory”) a matched conspiracy. Paedophilia (younger, more fertile) has been outlawed whereas homosexuality (guaranteed infertile) is now both legal and encouraged (with initiatives such as sex change development offered to “asexual” [sic] children as young as four years old). Clearly all measures improve the ongoing population control/reduction agenda. I should add that whereas some institutionalised heterosexuals may argue they have a right to abolish repulsive homosexual practices, any [even justifiable] overt or covert despotism still prepares undeniable infringements against sovereign liberties.

Eugenics’ attack on the people has been unyielding. Wars used to be the preferred vehicle. Yet, as I write, the American “health system” (for instance) debatably shows up ten to a hundred times more effective at disposing of populations than war, depending on which statistics are favoured. Several drugs (including dozens of branded opiates) administered under the banner of “healthcare” are known to kill or impair life. The best reference is “auto-immune deficiency” so-called AIDS. Harmless retrovirus HIV was blamed for [known] effects caused by previously shelved (1950’s) chemo drug AZT. Naturally symptoms have been by no means limited to HIV “sufferers”. Timothy McVeigh’s foolhardy quest to bring down a building in Oklahoma City in 1995 was masterminded by the same powers he was attacking in defence of the “program”. They were behind the (at least) 50,000 AIDS related deaths of First Gulf “War” veterans. Ignorant conscripts were killed by their supposedly “protective” medications.

To be honest I believe the 1960’s flower power movement was a corporate inspiration too. Either that or corporates rode the coattails of the general erosion of faith in traditionalism (also a reaction to the distrust that blew over into anti-war mass desertions from Vietnam?). When did “the people” ever make any sincere [group] initiatives for themselves? I believe the powers wanted to introduce contraception universally. By that token, temporarily encouraging promiscuity was the only rational lever against the [Catholic] Church. Even so, to this day Catholicism has not bowed to Zionism on that level. The sexual revolution was predictably short lived. Prominent film stars, HIV and AIDS put a huge damper on any free thinking after the 1980’s.

It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world.

I haven’t personally referenced Jon Rappoport’s “AIDS Inc.” (1988) but I feel sure he will have delivered correct conclusions after reviewing his various websites. Paedophilia is also nothing short of a stagnant political move as are all other trappings designed to bolster the Eugenic movement’s determination to deny life. Forget the hotbed “abortion”. From the lofty position of purity, is not contraception the undeniable attempted murder of an unborn child? Given their Zionist-Bolshevik tactics, I would be very surprised if the visceral anti-abortion lobby is not another face of the same arbitrary plutocracy. When “they” decide they need to repopulate, anti-abortion will become the new flavour of the month. Currently abortion is a decoy that removes the sting from contraception.

Those demonstrably anti-paedophilia have been set up, applied more or less zero attention to the real issues. The shambles that is “organised” (a splintered, refracted mess) society is our testament. Rationalist Eckhart Tolle makes a surprising amount of sense in his claim that classical crusaders crusade merely for empowerment of their egos. I extend that philosophy somewhat and emphasise the bigger and more divisive the “cause” (sic), the greater the “individual” empowerment. There is no bigger cause than paedophilia currently. It is the mother of all causes today. Protesters, critics and complainers keep well clear of truth in order to preserve their egos. Maintaining the fantastical narrative line in deference to truth is the objective goal. Besides, if their “big issue” was to evaporate indefinitely, aimless lives would have nothing to bolster egos. Political spin, intricate make-believe dressed as truth has avowed the horrible “standards” that have cultured public infatuation.

Because the cultivation of biological automatons is the brainchild of the “program’s” covert marketing arm, Zionism (symbolising prison planet), there is almost absolute topical congruity between the mainstream and “alternative” press instruments. Alternatives also weave their own brands of make-believe and encourage that most foul of whimsical, plausible denials’ – “who to believe?” Indeed, as most independent or third party writers and journalists are incapable of doing much more than parroting or reacting against information issued by mainstream/alternative “authorities”, sanity has become wedged somewhere between a rock and a place beyond vital imagination. Even the great Jon Rappoport hasn’t ever dared offer paedophilia a fair birth from what I have read. Only an extraordinary journalistic genius with a death wish could and would religiously tackle this subject with unbiased sincerity. Like homosexuality in its wake, paedophilia now humbles the zealous.

Arguably everything political began with the collapse of Atlantis. After the Pharisees (the theoretical Atlantis “derelicts” Nicolai Levashov mentions in his illuminating book “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors”) conquered relative druidism 3,000 years ago, a globalist agenda has followed the uniform path towards the “program’s” unilateral attempt aimed at shaping all other creeds and cultures in its image. Permitting only Puritan adjusted worship is one of the many small steps aimed to configure that grand design. Sharia Law (a cauldron of intolerance; banning all manners of sexual expressions), incidentally, few seem to real realise, is iconic Zionist Law.

Political charades “for order” are exploited by puppeteers that use militant groups (deliberately formed for such purposes) such as “ISIS” and “Al Qaeda” to instil fear. Labelling of designate “children” (with 21 desired as the ideal age barrier) and applied sexual prohibition has been a long standing goal that heralds back to the Victorian era (and presumably prior). In some ways it surprises me that Gladstone did not realise the utopian objective back in the nineteenth century. Although with infant mortality prevalent and the need for fodder for wars to once and for all break the opposition in his time, outcomes and their contingencies have been predictable to say the least.

Maybe it was last year or perhaps the year before when I noticed a mainstream headline that poked me in the eye. It was significant enough to spur me to remove MSM as my default webpage. The article in question presented one of America’s provincial sheriffs’ who was voicing implausible concerns over a child rape trial. The “child”, at the time, had been seventeen years old. Two days before her eighteenth birthday, she had allegedly voluntarily engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse (statutory “rape”) with her [then] boyfriend. Only in America could a “trial” like that be “taken seriously”. But it does highlight the fact that the “program’s” zeal is all about fanatically vigilant oppressive power of order, bereft of sane judgement. Australia (where I live currently) handles these matters differently.

Over a decade ago a mature looking twelve year old, blonde haired girl produced a bouncing heir with her [also] underage boyfriend (if memory serves me right, he was fifteen). The sensational TV show “Current Affair” was all over the news like a baby’s rash. They “named and shamed” everyone they could collect until everyone associated turned bright purple and frothed at the mouth. Nothing was done about the couple because nothing could be done so, after the furore, everyone politely looked the way, except there was a sequel. The hapless girl dared produce a second sprog at age sixteen by the same father (this time presumably of father worthy age). Sacra-bleu!!!!! I hope the TV show paid her well. She deserved every cent. He was almost certainly jailed for twenty years or more.

There is actually quite a long history behind changing attitudes. Chronologies (were they to be read and digested) would go a long way to diffusing the sheer insanity that currently embroils the paedophilia “outrage”. Attitudes have, in some ways, remained the same but it is reflective contingences employed that have radically altered. Perhaps making the adolescent discovery tour “theoretical” has helped induce mesmerised masses. People’s inability to focus on anything in isolation (thus perpetually basing existence on generalities) appears to be the most devastating symptom of the “TV age”.

One could look back at the collapse of craft industries in favour of industrial commercialism as the beginning of the withering of independent mind [that worked off trial and error and, ultimately, questioned everything]. In the eighteen and nineteenth centuries there were occasional challengers. Disparate groups, such as the Luddites, did attempt to block imperial progress. Interestingly, prior toindustrialisation”, learning centres were almost exclusively used to prepare society’s elite classes. In fact, going much further back, I would argue it was only after the abolition of the mystery schools (run by the druids) in the Dark Ages that saw the shift from education to processed dogma learnt by rote as the staple for mainstream education.

Even those that complete a Master’s Degree today are given no marks for personal input beyond how it satisfies comprehension of “evidence”) (i.e. synthesised “worthy” information that has been rubber stamped by “credentialed” proscribed agents of globalism under the thumb). To which end eventually none dare question established “rules” which are actually beyond question. It is also duly noted that the precise same strategy has been used by political proponents that word laws governing paedophilia in ways to ensure any possible “right minded” intellectual protagonist’s challenge would be judged as spitefully ambiguous (at best). I find no evidence supporting rationale behind our current childhood threshold and can but assume the demonstrably baseless “18” figure was pulled out of thin air at the whim of some starched bureaucrat or other. Globalist hacks have been running “Holocaust style” attack campaigns against anyone that dare test viability ever since.

It was not that long ago when the age of [marital] consent was “12” (following ancient Roman tradition) in some US states and the European nation of Holland. America may be recognised as the modern day super power, but originally it was founded and developed as a formidable expansion of the Union of Jacob (or Great Britain), so the history of English law making plays extreme relevance to this debate. There was no legal age of consent until one of the British Middle Ages Kings decided to impose boundaries through fear that there would be no under limit to matrimonial alliances (or presumed sexual liaisons) with maidens. I am deliberately foggy on “which king” it was because I would like it to be Norman Jew William the Conqueror (who ushered in a “new age of [cloaked] Zionism”) as it does fit well with my overall patter. So if he’s the one, top marks for me.

Either way, for the best part of a millennium “the people” and their ruling powers had no objection to marital unions between de facto “adults” from age twelve. It was a king (the “contemporary” power) who had instigated radical new restrictions (be it conceived from ancient foundations) which also implies some marriages (prior to law) were made between parties (maidens specifically) aged less than twelve years. One would imagine that a small popular core would have always been against “young” marriages, whereas the majority must have been easy with whatever was the conventional norm. The perennial remainder (probably an equally distinct minority) are traditionally mostly shown as bloated cadaverous sorely vocal antagonists destined to bluster at first sight of illuminated “reasoning” by compilers of historic propagandas. Those that covet callous restrictions will do anything to preserve them.

In medieval times (as emphasised earlier) the age of consent strictly concerned marriage but did not place any focus on sexual activities outside matrimony. That was left to religion. Western religion is an adaptation of Roman paganism. Therefore when Christianity sprouted from the burning embers of Gnosticism, naturally austere (Pharisee promoted) rules were applied to marriages which ideally revered all lustful and licentious behaviours as “ungodly”. A functional allowance was made for purposes of procreation. Per this fashion, an adaptation of orthodox Jewish attire, the Christian bridal gown, attempted to limit “lustful” sexual intercourse between marital partners. Even so, for a great period (can anyone say with “authority” how long?) the proverbial line was drawn at age “12”.

So how has this ongoing “con operation” been run in a way to successfully beguile the madding masses? Today’s mental health institutions and asylums for the insane provide glimmers of insight. I determine that the profession’s handbook outlining three hundred or so “behavioural conditions” is simply an expansion of crass religious judgement as to what it is to be “good” or “evil”. Jon Rappoport regularly advises all behaviours classed as varied evidence of insanity are equally symptoms of normal behaviour. Evil (as termed) actions therefore are now indefinitely branded as manifest insanity. Modern society runs on adapted rules that are designed to obfuscate the truth, so while one could argue we are either “more” or “less” free than before, in principal only “terminologies” have changed and not the convictions that delivered them.

When the world was conquered in the 1650’s (capitalising on discoveries such as the United States of America), there was an uncomfortable transition from royal to civilian government power. The full changeover took about 300 years and today no royal wields any visible power. It was only after civilian government was firmly rooted that perceived social issues were targeted by the pariahs of control to facilitate their utopian dream agenda. Of course, the ideal policy (as far as they are concerned) is always eradication, but when (as is so often true) extreme measures fail, soft humanitarian ploys are stealthily drafted. Similar to current workings of political/legal administration, reasons behind tortured virtue offered as “grounds” rarely (if ever) matched true objectives behind schemes unveiled as “value solutions”.

High Victorian British politics eventually found a Prime Minister with the right measure of zealous hatred to tackle youth sex head on with a proverbial sledge hammer. Himself a reputed brothel crawler (and paedophile), William Gladstone first increased the age of consent to “15” in 1875. So foul was his hatred it inspired infection and; consequentially, he succeeded in raising “the bar” again to “16” by 1878. This did nothing to inhibit intimate relations with children, as evidenced in outpourings of diatribe over the plight of a pregnant provincial London prostitute aged ten in the early 1900’s. Whether the girl was anything more than a figment of the imagination remains to be proven. There are numerous other period artistic writings that might be sourced to highlight identical topical content.

Logic underpinning Gladstone’s reasoning behind the marital age of consent increases was null and void, more or less precisely equating to William the Conqueror’s war spoil “logic”. Age fifteen, and then sixteen, was simply deemed “young enough”. No science or consideration to individuals’ right to choose was applied or contemplated. Each was a corporate edict for the nonsense that is proscribed as the “greater good”. The same lack of basis was approximated in 2001 when Great Britain almost paved the way to the “program’s” supreme goal “21”. If legislation for the age of consent (now beyond marriage, of course) set at twenty one had passed, the rest of the world (an extension of Great Britain) would have been doomed to follow, eventually. In other words, legislations are arbitrary measures. Construction of a “group identity” model permitting only standardised values and behaviours for standardisation’s sake is the selfish result. Given the raft of evidence, even a slothful fool should determine this always has been (albeit in varied forms) the plan; though few “in power” would dare agree or admit to their repugnant deceitfulness.

The reason the powers have dimly promoted their numerous nurturing society “concepts” (even though society does anything but nurture) is messages are designed to make the opposite of truth “appear” truthful. In fact categorisation/classification of [designate] children supports a global social enslavement program (one of numbers of cultural adjustment frameworks that are currently processed simultaneously and connected via the World Wide Web and other international exchanges). In effect, each synthesised cycle is designed to break children into new gormless adult slaves as asset-worthy (“useful”) fodder to man the system. Per this design, children are instructed fantasy is more plausible than truth, though (thankfully) not every teacher plays dumb.

Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood.

Individuals (making up the majority) that are determined to be law abiding (patriotic) become effective prisoners in their own open society. Sexual repression invariably leads to differing communication problems between sexes and, to a certain degree, estranges relations. The miraculous presupposed instant transition from impertinent scripted childhood to “proficient” adulthood does not prepare the way for pretty society. Each new insolent, spoilt, self-centred, experience lacking generation of “adults” attempts to crudely push its way up the queue. Many have predictably abused their supposed “right” to say no and have been conditioned into thinking any (and all) natural sexual acts are “theoretical” forms of rape. Few adults will contend there are only determinations to be and no “rights” at all (a fact the “program” callously capitalises on).

Culturally male/female roles/mindsets have not kept pace with everything else that has been going on in the background (i.e. systemic shredding of individualistic natural sexual dignity). One consequence is men and women are still destined for classical marital unions (even if not in name). Men, per this profile, must seek sexual gratification and women should provide the opportunity (i.e. male hunters, female prey). However, because women now collaterally (i.e. “the great group”) envisage all sex acts as “potential” forms of rape, they have been given an enormous degrading power.

In their administrative capacity, they can permit undignified sexual acts with whomever they choose, when legitimate and “legal”. Downgraded social ethics have had the effect of dragging all women down to the realms of whoredom (or celibacy for dissenters). Any whore’s power is her “right” to administer sex “favours”. “Program” masters know this full well. Their “combobulation” child exploitation takes whoredom away from the spotlight. Thus, the modern day whore cannot traffic (an exploit variant) him or herself. He or she must traffic another or others. Prostitution, from the time it was labelled “the oldest profession”, has been effervescently legitimised. “Populist” anger has specifically shifted from attacking prostitution in general to the [predominantly phantom] child sex industry. This is not to say “decent society” is comfortable with prostitution, but affairs of the flesh do not antagonise in the way they used to.

Physiologically, the only morally valid justifications behind any prohibitions of sexual acts might be on grounds of “lack of fertility” or body “immaturity” (which would provide basis for the mother of debates if tackled sincerely). Those proven unfertile could be justifiably deemed sexually unaccountable and, providing “procreation” was seen as the only functional benchmark for that type of communication, it could be outlawed to satisfy the requirements range outlined. There is actually quite a big degree of variance in apt statistical data on this arena. The youngest “woman” (on record) ever to birth a child was aged six. Women, in general, may begin their menstrual cycles from about age nine. Men are late risers with the ability to ejaculate prevalent usually from about age thirteen. The youngest father (for my research) is listed as aged eleven.

According to “nature” (reflective of God), a sexual metamorphosis demonstrably takes place in women at age nine and men of age thirteen. Thus, an uncomfortable surplus of wilderness years in respect of current legal accountability should be duly noted. Wilderness years, in the case of women, number nine. For men there are five years. How is this legal accountability in any way, shape or form naturally legitimate? By the time an average woman turns eighteen half her life has been sexual. God’s blessing has been terrorised and abused by society’s ignorance and abject subservience to the “program”. Terrorist peers foist the consequences of their foul laws on the trembling masses producing barely a shudder of dissent. Yet all should be acutely aware that these measures are designed purely to degrade the majesty of sexual intercourse to further scope for the production of “efficient” human “automatons”. Killing off stagnant populations is a fringe benefit.

When a woman turns eighteen, psychologically, nothing changes. Her mindset is still the same as it was before. She had been sexual but to be sexual was to “sin” (a pharisaic Judaic preconception) and this was “forbidden” (fruit). She was sexual but, as nothing has actually changed, to be sexual now IS to “sin”. There is one difference and it’s a big one. It is the power of control. Before she could illegitimately offer sexual consent or forbidden fruit (opening the door to all sorts of nasty blackmail scenarios) and now she can legitimately grant sexual consent as the fruit is ripe (opening the door to all sorts of nasty “double standards”). This is how sexual women have been reduced to whoredom.

Men have paid the price too. The perverse game we call politics impinges on all male values. Those that are not avowed celibates are rapists-in-waiting. Under foul terms as these, any man that dares to succumb to sexual urges can and will be accused of theoretical rape. This is all courtesy of modern social-conditioning mechanisms geared to elevating fantasy. The average woman now believes she always has the “right” to determine which “rapes” are permissible. She can also change her mind. That is the modern woman’s “privilege”. Women that kowtow with the “program”, in deference to God, lampoon our most uncharitable, sacrilegious, sanctimonious system of order. It is a system that relies on the deceit, dishonesty and partisan biased judgement of its user base. Never forget, all laws polarise judgement.

The crux of the arguments (ever so rarely in plain sight) supporting age legislation tend to rely on [corrupt] academic standards as “justification” for categorisations in place. Never mentioned are the numerous early teens “prodigies” put through the university system early. These are the anomalies that frustrate the “program”. The maturity gap, when inspected in detail, is far larger than most would imagine. For example, in relatively recent times a six year old British boy was heralded as the new oils (painting) master. Back in the 1980’s a petulant pup became a self-made millionaire (when being a millionaire meant something) in computers before he had reached his tenth year.

Martha Argerich’s (a celebrated Argentine virtuoso) notorious 1949 first public performance of the piano solo of Beethoven’s first concerto when she was seven years old presents an interpretation that would put most adults to shame. There is an account of a nine year old girl who successful singlehandedly reared the surviving family for several weeks after her mother died. Only lack of money ultimately frustrated her course. Given these facts, age legislation is indisputably unfair. Why is it supported so widely and so staunchly by our trembling masses?

There is a simple answer sadly seemed beyond the lateral comprehension of ordinary folk. In fact the answer has already been substantively outlined. People are generally pathetically weak and lazy. The largest, most incessantly in focus voices always seem to grab the limelight, founding “opinions” as they go. Mass Medias, therefore, control the way people generally think. Yes there are occasional dissenters, but, generally speaking, mass Medias tend to push (control) the populist view. That is because supporting broadcasters employed by mass Medias are people too. Broadcasters are not significantly different to any average man on the street. They too are mostly weak and lazy and don’t like to think too deeply about “obvious” issues. Of course, on the other hand, if the majority mysteriously morphed into dissenters, mass Medias would disappear as fast as they appeared and the “program” would perhaps have to engage dogmatic religion to shore up cultural adjustments once more.

Weakness and laziness by themselves do not cement opinions that are used to back legislation, such as edicts supporting age restrictions. People act because they feel empowered by acting. There is a fundamental perceived payoff for parents that support the synthetic dividers separating proscribed “children” from “adults”. The payoff is controlling power. Being the boss or “king” must be regarded as the pinnacle of empowerment and, consequentially, families have been moulded into control hierarchies. Perhaps this has always been the case. For as long as historic memory records, periodic shifts to varied standards used to justify different age categorisations have been relatively seamless. That, by no stretch of the imagination, makes wrongright”.

We must never underestimate conditioning mechanisms in the background geared to advancing false status-quo. Currently, each new crop of sexual children is deliberately immersed in cultures of facile restriction. Years long torment offers the vague promise of “freedom” (age eighteen “adulthood”). Developmental pressure builds from “terrible teens” to graduation. Many have willingly tried to believe in law and order to be patriotic (one of the group). They never rebelled. They never came to terms with what they had been denied. They never attempted to discover. Therefore, the majority of emerging and new adults bitterly support a terrorising system because they were “forced” into making sacrifice themselves.

In other words, pathetically weak adults will go to any lengths to wreak revenge on their kith and kin simply to appease their own failed ethical development. If you cannot honour yourself, how is it possible to behave responsibly to others? The great tragedy is [it seems] that people are incapable of recognising their sexuality or, to a greater degree, understanding how corporate interests stole their natural development. If age standards defining adulthood were radically shifted upwards to say forty years as the new age of consent, I do not believe there would be any major rebellion (after the first generation targeted was out of mind’s way). Old habits die hard, so I will concede the “powers” would have a hell of a marketing task ahead of them. How to convince all those marginalised people that merely want to behave naturally they are “wrong” to do so?

I have already outlined that British legislation tabled an increase to age twenty one in 2001, so why stop there? If the predominant cause behind age laws is nothing short of a population control/reduction measures, then (given the ever rising masses) logic suggests further increases are going to be ushered in. (Subtly ignoring the ethics nightmare exposing the true face of industrialism) China’s austere corporate experiment permitting only one child per family unit predictably failed dismally. Then again, if you can forbid sovereign adults “sexual license” by labelling them as “children” in legislation, the outlaw of procreation satisfies an expansion of the eugenics mantra. Ages twenty five and thirty marked traditional ancient Roman and Jewish commencement of maturity. Age fifty is of religious significance in Tibetan culture (and generally classed as the start of “middle age” in the west). Seventy five is another modern western classification milestone representing maturity or “old age”.

There potentially is no upper limit. Perhaps in the future sexual permits will be kept to octogenarians, the well-to-do that satisfy legal “exemptions” (loopholes) and “approved” (sanctioned) whores (to “service” the well-to-do)? Slavish automatons would do well to understand that each (fiendish) plan can only be stymied by the lack of faith of its designers. Confidence in communication is everything, but that is ultimately largely backed by compliance test initiatives. A sound pitch bolsters faith and the rest can be left to chance. What better target to exploit than “the family”? By turning corporate-political objectives into “family planning” advice, devious powers have cast a brilliant initiative. Families can now blame themselves for government issues and most will be oblivious to the fact. Admittedly a few have been waking up to the truth that “schooling” is actually social indoctrination in drag. But is this enough to spur momentum towards worldwide clear vision and outright revolution?

Times have changed greatly. In England years ago when attitudes were different, the age of consent was still sixteen. People could and did enter into marital unions at that age. These were normally sexual unions too. But that was trivial because teenagers (prevalently over twelve years old) also commonly interacted sexually. Legally underage pregnancies were unsurprisingly not particularly scarce. Ironically and sadly, the great “outrage” was against additional “family burden” as the young were obliged to be indoctrinated at school and few would have had the influence to earn “breadwinning money”. To me it shows just how pitifully inherently selfish people are. If only the vigour applied to blame and transference was directed at taking ownership of problems and compassionate dedication to delivery of lasting real solutions, then societies might be something to be proud of.

A long time ago, when I was fifteen, my mother asked my father to give me some sex advice. I vividly remember how he approached the cause. “You know all about it [sex], don’t you son?” He stammered, confidently. I nodded back wisely, as I had been the proud owner of a well-thumbed “hard core” adult magazine from age fourteen. Indeed, the pages were so well loved; they had come away from the staples in places. The point being is my father was too embarrassed to broach the subject of sex with me. It remained the unspoken understanding for as long as he lived. He used to use euphemisms like “it’s as easy as riding a bike” when he knew I kept damned well falling off. This is the norm, I’m told. Occasional controlling parents spew their ill-founded opinions. The rest offer silence when the silly puns run out.

Controlling parents aim to censor inappropriate behaviours. These might include masturbation in public. A Talmudic branch of Christianity called the Baptist Church (traditionally) labels masturbation a “sin”. Offspring of Baptist families are surely dealt all sorts of psychological blows unless they adjust to being exceptionally deceitful.  When I was very young I remember all the local kids in my playgroup used to occasionally interact with [vaguely sexual] truth or dare games. My own junior sister was particularly prolific in her formative years. We lived in a rural Jacobean period farmhouse which had a winding spiral staircase to the upper floors. Between beams my father had lodged makeshift cream chipboard panels to form walls and these made as excellent “scribbling” white boards.

One day, after a rather heated discussion with my mother, my sister (then age six) drew a biro cartoon of a “matchstick” couple copulating to prove she knew about sex. I am not sure it was a masterpiece but it was technically sufficient for the purposes under scrutiny, earning an immediate deletion under a double layer of white paint. Interestingly my mother never punished my sister for that and said nothing more on the subject. What could she be “punished” for? Knowing the truth? It seems fitting to roll out Krishna’s immoral quote (a regular visitor to this website) once more, “Spirituality brings to freedom whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What would Krishna have said about modern day paedophilia hysterics?

Perhaps it is no accident that the powers behind their mischief “program” sometimes refer to themselves as the Annunaki Brotherhood. The Order’s iconography depicts a thick braided cross trapped by an unbroken wicker circle. Cosmically, a cross represents path choices but the circle closes off any avenue of inquisitive exploration. The icon, therefore, is the “prison planet” or Zionism symbol. It sets paralysis standards (put into motion by pharisaic usurpers); the ones Krishna described as “evil”. Social paralysis begins with restriction of will [of the child] to confuse the mind (spiritual centre) in order to produce broken, de-spiritualised adults (slaves by any other name). To socially outlaw sexuality is to remove the most fundamental of all birth rights. Bodies without minds are only capable of following orders.

But there is more. Few are aware of the true potence of sexual self-esteem. Potent life is contained in the chakra governing the erogenous zones from conception. Those that deliberately superficially attack sexual developmental behaviour aim to create literal zombies – walking dead!

Advertisements

Beliefs and UFO’s

ufo-nightAs UFO’s are intrinsically and unbreakably “justified” by beliefs, the first half of this post has been devoted to discussing belief systems. Indeed, unusually, many ideas that formulated the basis of this forum were not mine. They were collected from a single unknown source that will remain unnamed. I take confidentiality very seriously, even though, in exceptional circumstances, a break is permissible. Regular readers will note scheduled posts For the Empowerment of You (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/for-the-empowerment-of-you/) and Society must never be Cashless (See https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2014/08/11/society-must-never-be-cashless/) ewh9cWj9SX20kl_kShhR-SH6PAAwere put on hold and published later. The day before releasing this entry, I attended an event hosted by Michael Tellinger. He discussed the objectives of his Ubuntu governance system which strives for a cashless society. My sentiment concurs but with a focus on honest electronic money as I am all for the removal of cash within limits and correct controls.

My thanks go out to the UFO Research NSW (See http://www.ufor.asn.au) for negotiating a discount for me. Tellinger, as charming as he was, did not entirely resonate with me. sunI question the objectives of someone squarely in it for the money after David Icke’s recent disgrace (See http://beforeitsnews.com/banksters/2014/07/david-icke-responds-to-the-peoples-voice-2-million-dollar-scandal-2434760.html). Is this not similar to the various crusading followers ultimately “conned” by Ron Paul? (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPWVvIjc5AU) His son, Rand, has amply converted to the other side and even Ron, himself, appears to have finally sold out or why did Mitt Romney bother to “endorse” him? Ron Paul Fraud(2)(See http://deadlinelive.info/2014/01/23/romney-admits-2012-nomination-was-stolen-from-ron-paul/). Is this the blueprint for so-called New World Order? The agenda seems to be to send charismatic, well-meaning spruikers out into the wider community only to demonstrate all are hollow pied pipers?

They did that to Communism (Read up on the real, virtuous late Victorian Communist Movement which has nothing to do with the state run commerce systems [Capitalism] of USSR and red China. libertySee https://libcom.org/history/bevington-louisa-sarah-1845-1895), so why not reduce any popular Messiah to the same fate? I do not wish to confuse intelligent readers that are aware of the Sumerian and Israelite Priest Kings. My use of the word Messiah is the virtuous Christian definition. harpawebsite_1350x550px_1To his credit, Tellinger put forward a strong case to suggest that the Priest Kings (See http://www.menorah.org/maoom12.html) ultimately are responsible for the bad attitudes supporting today’s foul belief systems This is backed up by Joseph P. Farrell’s research of the ancient banking systems and real reasons behind their creation (See https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/joseph-p-farrell-babylons-banksters/).

maxresdefault Moving along to those discussions I promised about belief systems. I am not good with diagrams (even though I undertook a Bachelor’s Degree in Art) so readers will need to fire up the imagination to summon a fitting pictorial model. In the centre of your fantasy vignette you should see seesaw scales with one end firmly planted on the ground (like ones you might find in a child’s recreation park). Upon the lowered end of the teeter rests various views and superstitions dressed as beliefs. In considerable lesser number are dispersed truths, many placed ridiculously out of context, perhaps when out-of-position they appear to validate superstitions. The other end, pointing up at a significant angle, can only be described as a sorry affair. There are a few withered question marks, so frail the Messiah himself would not be able to resurrect them. One or two may have been old discredited beliefs, but others are rejected views, disproven superstitions along with the very occasional truth that is ridiculed wildly out of context.

Protecting these belief systems are armour plated attitudes. Thus, above the raised end of the waver there is a solid titanium shield with a central lipped gutter. It is tilted in such a way that any “threats” to existing beliefs are easily expelled. Above this pictorial scene is a giant funnel with two compartments. BadEggThe good “eggs” that reinforce the existing belief system go in one slot and the bad eggs are ejected via the titanium shield. Rejects end up in a recycling plant. Those that can be rationalised into the current belief system are gently upgraded. Any and all disprovable information sources are forgotten, but a few anomalies will undoubtedly fester as tormented unwanted pets. If this aptly summarises human belief systems, it is no wonder redneck Republicans rarely evolve. It should be no surprise vegans almost never become meat eaters. It is logical to assume that every cause has its own propaganda tool chest.

There are always ways of circumventing belief systems, of course. MKUltra has highlighted neurological deprogramming using strong mild-altering drugs is not illusory (See http://gizmodo.com/project-mkultra-one-of-the-most-shocking-cia-programs-1370236359). Truth seekers will find a power of good in the writings of Jon Rapopport (See http://www.nomorefakenews.com/). duck4Jon has written an enormous amount of the failings and “quack” nature of psychiatry (amongst other things). He also exposes Mkultra-style techniques rather closer to home. The alarming increase in accidental deaths (See http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-24/concern-over-anti-psychotic-drug-given-to-soldiers/4649704) or suicides of armed forces’ personnel (aided by psychiatry in many cases) gave me one of those “magic light bulb” moments.

Imagine the alternative Media’s had made a sufficient dent in the group consciousness to dissuade all but cold blooded psychopaths from attempting to join the armed forces. Yet, a few emotional, sugar coated adverts focusing on the nice side of the business conned a few intelligent, sensitive suckers into seriously considering signing up. Let us say the recruiter said to his computer geek recruit that it would be almost inconceivable for “him” to be called to the front line. Of course, keeping in line with the need for a “legal” disclaimer (See http://alexwhite.org/2011/04/those-disclaimers-at-the-end-of-corporate-emails-turns-out-that-theyre-pointless/), the recruiter might insincerely low-light the “but I need to inform you” [of what could happen] drone. 2015-07-31-niles-iIf they, the virtuous armed forces, needed a publicity stunt (or false flag in the venacular) to demonstrate there are “enclaves of terrorists” in Afghanistan (See, for ideas, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/02/israel-war/), might they not select a large, but unknown city as the potential breeding ground? Any family will do. Give the computer geek an automatic weapon, those special night vision goggles (courtesy of the Draco – low ranked ones associated with the NAZI’s; Altarians? See https://www.alien-ufos.com/ufo-alien-discussions/44338-list-twelve-alien-technologies-world-has-benefited.html and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knJ5IlI73Ig) and tell him to go at them might encourage a mutiny.

tMedications-pills3 Give the same soldier psychedelic drugs; he will not only go after them but approach the task of murdering an innocent Afghan family for the greater good with zealous relish. When the mind-bending drugs wear off, it is no wonder the conscience is so often overcome with remorse; as attested by the numerous suicide statistics. To be brutally frank, suicides are welcome by the military junta because they clear up all those “loose ends”. I think it is important to reinforce the message that the reason suicides are increasing in the armed forces is pretty much squarely due to the medications issued by psychiatrist quacks (See http://ppjg.me/2014/07/20/the-hidden-enemy-inside-psychiatrys-covert-agenda/). Do not think for one minute it’s just the military affected by this curse.

Let us pause for a second to remember the poor victims of the MH-17 attack (See http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/07/21/guilt-insinuation-paul-craig-roberts/). Even someone as open minded as me struggles to fathom how “the West” could kill its own to put spin on propaganda directed at a war with Russia or, formal, World War Three (See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2702002/US-Russia-created-conditions-shoot-down.html). Ok, perhaps that jumping the gun and maybe they’re not that brave (See http://en.ria.ru/politics/20140723/191137275/Russia-Israel-Joining-Efforts-to-Improve-International-Terrorism.html). Even so, let us never forget that more than three thousand innocent Westerners died simply to jumpstart a disastrous war over control of the Middle East. Mickey-Mouse-Wallpaper-11Whether Israel, “Zionism”, the USA or Mickey Mouse was behind it makes it no less of a tragedy (See http://rehmat1.com/2012/08/22/israeli-jew-author-zionists-did-911/). The tragedy is the mainstream Media have shown themselves to be nothing less than viperous liars (See http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/frontpage.html). A sinister crime of the most diabolical nature was committed and to promulgate their never ending cycle of insincerity, they duplicitously court and excessively support false belief systems. screen+Shot+2012-01-22+at+10.41.59+AM

Living at the other end of the world has its advantages. Of the brainwashed slaves, some of the most open minds reside here. As a consequence we have numerous thriving UFO Societies. There is the UFO Research (NSW) Inc. (See http://www.ufor.asn.au/), Campbelltown UFOPRSA (See http://www.ufosociety.net.au/), Tuggerah Lakes UFO Club in Sydney and several others. I am aware too of the Chatterbox Group, the Blue Mountains UFO Research Club NSW based communities. We also have some luminaries of international pedigree, such as Mary Rodwell (See http://www.acern.com.au/) and, though I rarely share his opinions, James Bartley (See http://www.whale.to/b/bartley3.html). Given the aggressive slander (in the mainstream Media) against credible UFO’s, aided by lone “debunkers”, a buoyant community interest in the subject here suggests there is some freedom from the narcissistic influences of the mainstream.

Nevertheless, even in domains that encourage self-expression, a magnetic manifesto mimicking mainstream superstitions/cultural programming seems to, without unanimously enforcing, guide popular opinion. Indeed the whole exo-politics (See http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_V.htm) industry teeters on undying subservience to renegade announcements from eminently respected scientists regardless of how the mainstream reacts (i.e. whether tabloids back or bag the information). Indeed, in light of the general mistrust in the mainstream, some prefer rejected announcements whereas others really only want to be validated by the organs of power. That is how the fearless Australian minds are divided, sad to say. 0Nevertheless, UFO’s have now become an acceptable part of folklore never really seeking formal validation, other than perhaps verifying authenticity of photography and determining the nature what is being filmed from a simple catalogue of obvious alternatives. Fringe partisan groups, such as the various so-called Disclosure Movements (See http://www.auforn.com/Disclosure_Australia.html) are revered to the point of worship, largely, regardless of sentiment or evidence backed announcements. As the ideal would be acceptance by “the mainstream”, the alternative has become “pseudo-mainstream” and, in that capability, gaping biases (some as deceptive as the mainstream trickery) have emerged over time. It might be said that to be an outlaw is not to lack dignity. Thus, let us call our Australian rebels refined renegades.

A tiny snippet from my unpublished fifth book, “Strange Times and Out-of-this-world Technologies” (of the Dimension, Deceptions & Demons series) more than aptly expresses my sentiment:

“It is important, at this juncture, to add that I refuse to acknowledge the mindless oxymoron “Unidentified Flying Object” or its partner acronym UFO. An object is either identified or not discussed. On the rare occasions I refer to them, I will term [presumed] alien spacecraft or other flying machines AAT’s or Advanced Alien Technologies.”

The volume is going to be an eye-opener and I recommend avid researchers keep a keen eye on development and promos as I may well reveal the “unrevealable”. In the interest of fairness (for this post) I am prepared to concede the acronym UFO under strict terms. Let me finish with a proposal as to how UFO communities can retain the title also keeping their intellectual dignity.

When I was a kid in England, my dad encouraged me to go bird watching. At the ripe young age of five, I took up the challenge with zest and called myself an ornithologist. That was my new word, then, though I do not think I have ever been a true ornithologist. Armed with a “concise guide to the identification of the birds of the United Kingdom”, binoculars in hand, I paraded the streets as though I was a professional. There were no “predators” then.

epyr-day-13-snow-finch-1It took me some years to hone the skills, similar to Australia’s UFO magnet phenomenon; Damien Nott (See https://www.facebook.com/damienjohnnott). Eventually a sixth sense told me where a bird was and in an instant it was in my binocular’s sights. Pow! When I was very young I spotted such rarities as the Aquatic Warbler (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquatic_warbler). Well, dad, of course, put that down as a Sedge Warbler (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedge_warbler). I saw a Richard’s Pipit (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard%27s_pipit) which turned into a common Meadow Pipit (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow_pipit) with parental oversight, but the Snow Finch (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowfinch) was an interesting one. It is hard to misidentify as its colours make it almost unmistakable. Dad put that down to an escaped cage bird, but as the finch only liked altitude it did not make a viable cage pet. Weird! Possibly a case of young, underdeveloped eyes (See http://www.geteyesmart.org/eyesmart/living/babies-children-teenagers-eye-health/vision-development.cfm))? Little Owl

Later, in my early teens, I flushed a game bird out of some bushes.

“What was that?” Dad shrieked.

“A partridge?” I exclaimed, flustered.

“No, that doesn’t count.”

Mum was there, too. She saw the Little Owl. I just couldn’t identify it.

The beauty of the bird watching hobby is, wherever I go, there is a field guide. SlaterWith me all the time in Australia, I have the guide to Australian birds so now I am an “expert on a tour” when armed with binoculars, notebook and pen. All I need to do is process critical identification criteria in a flash. Size? Type? Gait? Distinguishing marks? What colour was the rump? Were the wings barred? Did it have a crest? And so on. Wham bam….Ultimately I can build a “profile” of a sighting.

One time, again in my late teens, we, the family, went to one of the Welsh remote islands – Skoma, from memory. There, my father, mother and I identified an unclassified bird. We took detailed notes, included were drawings from different angles. This was recorded from “tip to toe”; a great sighting, but it could not be found in the guide. Possibly an American vagrant? Maybe. Birds are “flying objects” too! classified

Why oh why do we call IDENTIFIED unclassified flying objects, “unidentified“? Isn’t that just plain dumb? Why not start a trend and rename UFO; UNCLASSIFIED Flying Object?

Next steps would need to see the compilation a field guide. That said, without “evidence” the mainstream is between a rock and a hard place over “classifications” as they have no guide either. So, perhaps, an “authority” perpetually “commissioned” but never released will silence the prowling wolves.

The System is Guilty

System-is-guilty-e1428169582149Schapelle Corby is not a global household name, but she should be. For those who have not heard of her, she is currently languishing in an Indonesian jail for drug smuggling. I don’t like Schapelle Corby. She is not my “type”. She is not a great thinker. Product of the system, she had a common rural Queensland Australian upbringing which makes her proto-Catholic by default. Maybe she did a little speed or took an “e” at a party, who knows, but generally speaking she is a bulk standard common beautician. She has not behaved noticeably badly or broken the social mould. So what went wrong?

On 8th October 2004 Corby was arrested for the possession and transit of 4.2kg of cannabis. About this time, a package of cocaine was found on a QANTAS jet heading out of Australia, although the circumstances were very different. Those who remember Ross Perot’s presidency contests against Bill Clinton may not have heard of his off the record allegations as to how the presidency works by the Bush dynasty. His candid allegations included federalised drug trafficking managed by Halliburton. After Schapelle Corby’s conviction the so-called Bali nine were captured trying to export 8.3kg of heroin from Indonesia. The Illuminati mainstream media failed to mention they were supplied by Interpol via a phantom Thai woman affectionately given the Cherry Likit Bannakorn pseudonym for her part in the sting. Van Trong Nguyen was arrested for the possession of 0.4kg heroin 11th December 2002 on transit in Singapore. The tiny export quantity suggested he was something the industry labels a wood duck. His backers remain unknown to this day and were likely connected to Interpol’s drug trafficking network. A “wood duck” is a decoy used to keep tipped off customs officials busy while large quantities of contraband are being exported.

Let us not lose focus of Schappelle Corby’s innocent plight. Those who have read the ramblings of prime Illuminati propaganda sources, such as A Current Affair or Sixty Minutes may rest assured the slanderous and incorrect false association character assassination of Corby is drivel. It is drivel primarily as it has no bearing on the case. Fortunately, I did review the United Nations 2001 recreational drug industry statistics. It makes interesting reading. The wholesale value, for instance, of cannabis in Indonesia was appraised at 20 cents per gram. According to my calculations that means 4.2kg cannabis could be purchased for $840 wholesale price. At the time US$840 was the equivalent of no more than $1,100 Australian. According to the Australian mainstream media valuations of the haul ranged from A$80-100,000. However, ironically and due to a flaw in the system, mainstream television issued the Indonesian version account via the SBS international stream. Bali Gold, as the cannabis haul had been lovingly described, was worth A$10,000. Interviewing 100’s of potential Bali holiday makers, I uncovered a common street price of about $7 a gram for marijuana compared to $20 in Australia. It also became clear the reason every Australian holiday maker went Bali was for cheaper prices. Given the extraordinary risk and potentially high price for exporting cannabis to Bali, should the premium be $50 or $100 per gram. Who would pay for it?

For the official version and official opinions, it gets worse. The consignment had neither been shrink-wrapped nor obscured in any way. Euphemistic accounts suggest the cannabis plant lay as it were harvested in plain sight on the top of all other suitcase contents. Once the suitcase was opened it was the first thing customs would see. Did I mention Schapelle Corby was a qualified beautician? She has shown no inclination to behave like an insane swash buckling air pirate determined to give cheap dope to the impoverished Australian masses in Bali in her many interviews. What a girl; a cultural hero exporting $100,000 of dope, to sell it for $29,400? Sell it for $10,000? Sell it for $1000? You pick!

The sorry affair of corrupt customs officials who have blamed their operative screening procedures has gained little media attention. It does not take a great imagination to construct the potential for a carrier service between the cannabis producing heartland, Queensland and the other states, but mostly Sydney. If, for instance, customs was completely corrupt it would be easy to use unwitting passengers baggage’s as mules. By default, entirely innocent passengers would entirely liable for these proceedings and would become proxy drug smugglers. Imagine, while you are in the mode, that a mistake was made and a baggage via Gold Coast, Queensland failed to be intercepted at Sydney and 4.2kg of corrupt customs cannabis zoomed off to Bali. What a hoot! Red faces all-round? I’d say! Would corrupt customs fess up and do the right thing? Give us our dope back you lying, cheating Indonesians. Of course not; they would do what was done to Schapelle Corby.

Feel safe travelling? If yes, then I pray to God this happens to YOU.