“1984” Unveiled Just in Time to Head off any Ascension of Man?

You can find Tim at https://www.deviantart.com “Edg3crush3r where he has some great commercial artworks for sale

For ill-informed, celebrated author George Orwell published a new sensational volume precisely one month after the reformation of Israel in 1948. The title he chose for his new book was “1984” which projected a future globe paralyzed beneath totalitarian control reminiscent of Huxley’s Brave New World ideology. Apt here, according to Thomas’ Gospel Jesus said “Damn the Pharisees! They are like a dog sleeping in the cattle manager. The dog neither eats nor [lets] the cattle eat.” In line, I regularly quote Krishna’s “forces of evil paralyze” and our global paralysis began in earnest from 1949 backing off a zealous program of universal immigration security. Per such auspices, it wasn’t too long before travel between intercontinental destinations would be impossible without a passport. What on earth has your passport to do with open rite of passage?

“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.” 1984 G. Orwell

Paradoxically, any ascension of man must motivate absolute harmonization of passage rite to have impacting effect. Thus, our “powers” overtly dedicated attack against true free right of expression undulates above vogue morality cultures and is aimed at containing sovereign liberty. The upshot amounts to this. Individuals have arguably never been furbished license to “think for themselves” since draconian conquest measures became outright. Symptomatic “Big Brother” ghosting technological advancements have managed to infiltrate just about every aspect of home and public life. There are currently no safe places to hide in the world, for the great group has made that their primary mandate. From this, it is imperative to observe a critical evolution. Universal removal of “harbor” commenced with implementation of immigration infrastructure.

Australian marine guards’ routinely boast no alien can penetrate the continental island’s thirty-six thousand kilometer coastline undiscovered.

Of course, conscience absent living has not been an arbitrary development. Crafting began long prior to the so-called Middle Ages (an apex period). Indeed, debatably, current “Illuminati practices” were rapidly cultivated in the post Roman Catholic dark ages. After Roman Emperor Constantine demonstrably “converted to Christianity” in 312AD (abolishing the known empire), the world would never be the same again. Unbeknown to most fanatical dedicates, this Christianity had made a mockery of Gnosticism (itself a rebrand of much more ancient “Atlantis” mystic spirituality). Unyielding purges of socially conflicting literatures (including outlaw of lost documents via various “Synods”) began with destruction of the great Alexandrian libraries. Dedicated thinkers should hardly marvel at the strange places hidden volumes of authentic texts (presented under auspices of Dead Sea Scrolls) have been uncovered.

Even when factoring in credence for doctoring, genuine Gnostic manuscripts present philosophies so markedly alien they could not be construed as evidence of evolution to mainstream Christianity. According to Arian Cathars (custodians of the Merovingian legacy), Christ was neither immortal nor miraculous. The term Christ in fact derives from Christos and, as such, is a Greek concept that envisages a new version of prophet king (prominent in biblical Old Testament folklore). Whilst my musings over Gnostic heritage may not seem directly relevant to “1984”, “druidic communion” has always been the alternative to New World Order. Whilst I haven’t personally read Orwell’s celebrated volume, I am versed as to synopses presented. Infinitely grander than other mildly confronting essays that thematically feature a cold war motif somehow vilifying deterrent hostilities, “!984” projects a globe deliberately plunged into ongoing conflict by opposing radical superpowers. Accompanying justifiable austerity measures propel solutions that equate to perpetual Martial Law. Political interests’ vice-like grip over world affairs symptomatically removes all limiting freedoms of expression.

Orwell’s revelations did predict a consequential a peace of sorts. None dare breathe too hard lest they be singled out by the “machine”. For ensuing public promotion might offer anyone up as a worthy example of defensible institutional correction. Orwell somehow uniquely manages to capture simmering pharisaic intent and percolate associated ideology into a compellingly pungent elixir. His overwhelming vision predicts war as the mechanism to guaranteeing universal subservience beneath common draconian laws. As such, “war is peace” on Earth can only be achieved via unbreakable governed “valued” control measures. The other option, its nemesis, is spontaneous evolution of aggregated self-ruling social collectives. Per Orwell’s projected philosophy, war most certainly does embody peace. The alternative, grass roots movements, were evident in Gnosticism’s attempts to amplify the ancient Atlantis model (spiritual authority guiding self-governance). Interestingly, that most abused Star of David (on Israel’s flag) is symbolic (of the Atlantis model). Consequentially, I feel sure over the ages skirmishes between Pharisees and Gnostics have been devoted towards outright ownership of their mutually prophesied messianic age.

Moving on, before we consider whether people are that stupid to fall for obvious deception associated with current worldwide quarantine facilities imposed against a theoretical medical threat I have argued must be misdirection (as presented, another short background would improve critical thinking. Were George Orwell’s ideological legacy to be brought into reality, we first must consider whether conflict or “communism” (caricatured in Animal Farm) would act as springboard. Communism, as rebranded “socialism”, has never really taken off. Still, authorities do prod at it from time to time, though none are committed to dealing with complexities attached to establishing realistic lasting communal freedoms. Their world, inch by inch, is not so gradually succumbing to one size fits all engineering. Aligned fake Gnosticism has neither proven compelling to the messes nor inspirational for supposed trend setters.

Ignoring those hardly relevant few hundred thousand World War II desertions, the only time the “establishment” has grossly miscalculated popular reaction to corporate determination was after conflict escalated in Vietnam. Vietnam effectively ended conscription because conscription no longer had the effect of entranced the masses. Powers had to reluctantly concede that the greater percentages of wider populations would no more sacrifice their lives for “king and country”. Neither will people accept nor contend with indefinite Martial Law without misdirection. Though fringe academia has acknowledged American healthcare organs (i.e. hospitals) are statistically far more lethal than battle, a breakdown of medical security against disease is the greatest social fear. Epping Studios vintage “Carry On” movies mocked British hypochondria. The only reason American hospital beds stay empty is majorities lack sufficient resources to be “sick”.

Taking this into account, the very first universal quarantine operation has predominantly been welcomed with open arms. Whilst the sacred few might howl “hoax” at the top of their voices, remonstrations have largely gone unheard by larger communities. My last two articles on the subject of Coronavirus identify a conspiracy bigger than Ben-Hur that stretches back more than twenty years to that HIV/AIDS psy-op (which corporate Medias assure us was an absolute “dud”). Given Bill Gates strategic role, I speculated the original plan was to synthetically effect a resurgence of the “dud”, but politics backfired when targeted Indian Hill Tribes “caught polio”. Ex. Buddy of disgraced Bernie Madoff, Dr. Anthony Fauci appears to have been in secret negotiations with Bill Gates’ foundation from 2010. Fauci is on front page of just about every newsstand as “lead expert” on Coronavirus.

Vigilant supporter and director of the Centres for Disease Control’s (a cartel of pharmaceutical enterprises that assumes an extra-government role) “contagion modelling”, the doctor bragged about, sorry, “predicted” a 100% certain imminent future pandemic back on his 2017 American University tour. Fortunately, the US surgeon general proved too resilient to corrupt. Over Trump’s smirks, he valiantly announced the American Government would opt for raw data modelling. Collected pertaining information released was as clear as day. Suffice to say, if Coronavirus wasn’t yet another “common influenza variant”, cause was definitely connected to the recent installation of the 5G network or, to be more specific, “extraneous technologies that emit electromagnetic pollutants.

My first article on the subject aimed at clearing up ignorance formulating science opinion determining viruses. Let’s face it, mainstream Medias, from day one, have been prepping us for an almighty “inoculation” campaign, the likes of which the globe has never seen before. In line, principles supporting conceptual contagious germs have become fortuitous building blocks that supposedly justify the case for a “vaccine protected world”, however academically flimsy. For instance, germ theory’s creator Rudolf Virchow clearly implied (what would later become known as) bacteria were the target. Though Pasteur appears to have adapted basis from Virchow’s classifications, paradoxically, his immunization theory targets what would become known as viral symptoms (called poxes then) which are safeguarded by synthetic compounds (sometimes including inorganic ingredients).

This enormous contradiction is rarely discussed with brevity in specialist papers or even observed by mainstream journalism’s generalist sentiment.

According to illustrious thought backing immunization, a body’s front line defenses (against any attacking illness) are naturally deficient. Yet, as if by miracle, formulated vaccines will stimulate “bionic” results in localized target areas even though, thus far, not one has been conclusively proven to work. Logic posits vaccines are not a defense against bacterial/fungal infection. Effective medical strategies combating these manner of attacks must take the form of solutions that directly target and completely kill off culprits without poisoning the body. There is something else though. Aside from “why disease at all?”, Virchow regretfully recanted his own theory late in life. His conclusions were simple. In principle, he argued the presumption that bacteria collected in clean water (sponsoring nothing to eat) was “nonsensical”. More importantly, associated rueful laments pondered (with abject bewilderment) why so many aggressive proponents were championing his flawed observations. Let’s hold that thought for a while.

So, my first article about Coronavirus discussed (1892 invented) viruses specifically. When Louis Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp walked the Earth side by side viruses didn’t exist. In fact, prior to 2019 Coronavirus (as per its current version) didn’t exist either. This is important to know, because my last article observed that post 2019 diagnosis of “allegedly” associated illness changed with the occurrence of the new complaint. Back in 2017 and 2018 pulmonary disease sponsored heart attack fatalities were as described. But now there is extreme ambiguity over the nature of all causes. Though symptoms leading to death may have been recorded as something else prior, it did not stop positive test results’ automatically reclassifying contemporary causes as Coronavirus. The funny thing is (something mainstream Medias try not to dwell on), numbers of Coronavirus false positives are too numerous to warrant statistics. An American nurse I interviewed some months ago needed to undertake a test to return to work. She wasn’t sick when she learned of her positive result and hasn’t been sick since.

Some might argue Coronavirus is “nothing new”. Contagion development has eerily mirrored that faltering thirty years old HIV path. It is no wonder, of course, because (as Dr. Judy Mikovits regularly emphasizes) the same basic players (connected to HIV) are critically running the current pandemic show.  To quote, she recently stated “identical [viral containment] measures are in place”. In my first article on the subject, I emphasized, following HIV, SARS, then wave after wave of bird flu strains (not to mention that swine flu dud) and Africa’s (George Soros’ brainchild) Ebola resurgence a few years back appeared to test predicted social reactions to a conceptual pandemic. I failed to mention that Soros is also one of the stakeholders involved with Gates’ Foundation’s Moderna vaccine. Naturally there have been negative academic reactions to all this. In fact, a veritable army (more than 40,000 last time I checked) of recalcitrant doctors have come out swinging at the “pointless” bureaucratic measures attached to Coronavirus and equally pointless, potentially dangerous, insufficiently or untested gene-altering vaccines. One aligned Norwegian highly qualified medic noted that his country’s death rate figures are normal, which means there is no pandemic [there].

23,000 words that formed into my prior two articles on the subject are ample, so I feel I have said enough about Coronavirus and its conveniently partnered “pandemic”. Nevertheless, the vaccine equation is a whole ‘nother story. In fact, I repeat that angry virtuous army of doctors has categorically remonstrated there is no pertinent reason to justify for vaccination against Coronavirus primarily because there have been no discernable causes of death so far. It is important to add, whilst mainstream western medicine generally ignores causes in preference towards catalogued symptoms development, the same basic premises apply. Following trends, high numbers of medics conclusively confirm that Coronavirus symptoms (as branded) are treatable, using standard “flu” remedies, such as vitamin D, zinc and other means. Will Trump’s “joke” about the complaint “disappearing” in April turn out true? But more about him and rigged elections later.

The Australian job market buckled and collapsed in response to governmental austerity measures. At the time, I was out of work. Other than a short, unprofitable stint back in September, my income options have teetered between giving Skype consultations and charitable handouts. I never supplement income with social security or “the dole” and, at US$250 or more a pop, Skype consultation requests have been thin on the ground. So, correspondingly, for the first time in my life, I have suffered writers’ block. Indeed, my heartfelt Christmas resolution to force myself back into the swing of things has barely produced a paragraph a day. But I’m not the only one suffering below the chaos that is one world government. There are subtle rumblings all around me. There is general distaste in bureaucracy. There is general distrust of corporate medias.

Momentum has led to a marked split forged between naysaying sycophants and causes without rebels.

For the last decade US electoral role statistics have been off the scale (not that any mainstream pundit would dwell on the fact). Usual excuses and objects of blame are used to justify figures, but is something else happening? Are people, slowly but surely, actually waking up for real? Certainly the same bad habits, general laziness towards activism paving the way for prevalent social parasitism, are very much alive and well. However, an ex-security guard advised me that airport scanners are not in place to necessarily uncover contraband. Their wider purpose (according to her information) is to scout for “new” genetic changes. Might this imply “the powers” anticipate a revolutionary super human manifesting at some juncture? Alternative circles of influence regularly speculate on attributes that will be possibly forthcoming from the so-called “5D” indigo child syndrome.

Dynamo and other billed “illusionists” now defy reality. To balance weighted objects on thin air is impossible. To bring printed butterflies to life is an act of God. Thus, today’s magic is more potent than illusion. We are either witnessing inter-dimensional fraud or manifest miracles of magnificent supremacy. Considerations surrounding such consequences could attribute an ascension of mankind. There has been a universal elevation of mind since 2011. It is worth reflecting on the “Mayan” wheel of the Sun (which, incidentally, could not have been carved after 10,500BC) here. Even though an unaccounted for full navigational degree is missing from the artifact, its supposed 2012 end date has proven a significant spiritual landmark. Yet, was fulfilment of the calendar’s complete cycle to symbolise the end of man’s spiritual demerit, then 2084 heralds our total shift into refreshed dimensional territory. It seems clear to me the process has already begun.

Given the grip materialism has on science philosophy few are able to appreciate what is meant by a “dimension”. So I think it is important to at least attempt to vanquish confusion. In line, diligently wise establish imperatives that all reality windows construct so-called “3D” models, even though, were holographic illusion to be perceived functionally, everything is flat packed and can be referenced via a solitary “zero” point. From within the many and varied illusory windows that permit realities, “objects” are formed from light. Because solidity is constructed from light it is frequency based. Components within (whether living or not) are tuned to specific ranges in order to function. Fundamental dimensions occupy extraordinarily large tranches of bandwidth (so certain informed sources break up composite real estate into graded portions, perhaps best compared to numerous channels waiting to be discovered on long wave radio). Accountably, there are only two black dimensions in total, which are (in part) constructed from the quantum layer. According to ancient sources, there are a further seven white dimensions, collectively known as “heavenly states”.

Congruent with this topic, upon ascension, our speculated dimensional shift will take us from the lower black dimension up into the higher one. Various effects are likely to be associated with the phenomena. Earth will apparently revert to Tara and our galaxy will blink into Holographic Universe Two. Nevertheless, according to Lemurian sources located inside the Jupiter moon Ganymede (who have sponsored information via Sixto Paz wells), Earth (and all she supports) doesn’t exist in Holographic Universe Two. On this, by way background, my other website discusses Earth’s relevant reconstruction from the debris of Tiamat in some detail. That billion years old divine intervention caused a new timeline to formulate, so, upon our ascension, there must be a logical merger of the two timelines. Topology of new Earth will significantly change as a result. Tara, if superficial accounts are to be believed, is of notably greater volume than today’s Earth. According to other folklores, our sun will transform into a shimmering rainbow coloured planet. Partnering star (that perished due to Tiamat’s accumulated residue debris around 200 million years ago) remains unscathed in the alternative timeline, so one must presume a cleanup initiative was rapidly implemented directly after Tiamat’s destruction. Replacement of the energy need void left by our current sun’s transformation has clearly been prepared for by Almighty God.

Yesterday a far from happy new year was ushered in to pops and bangs angrily proliferated by hapless Arabs that surround my locality here. Today I have been reflecting on the last twelve months; possibly the most placidly turbulent of my life. According to her family, my Thai wife “died”, though I don’t necessarily believe them. That relationship hinged on my constant financial support and when the money dried up, it withered with those desert carcasses. Nevertheless, fortune has blessed me with a new supreme spiritual partner; this time remarkably younger than myself and from the heart of Europe. With an angel of love on my shoulders pain of suffering has significantly eased, but I still require an income. It would be remiss of me not to tender a shameless services plug in light of this. My infamous Skype consulting sessions come at a hefty price, though participants regularly remind me they are cheap “considering the weight of information” that is always supplied. Generally focusing on and providing analysis of paranormal, extra-terrestrial and extra-dimensional connections, I am possibly the only person on this planet with access to certain deeply buried truths. You can read more about me here.

In my elevated frame of mind, on one of my regular outings to job interviews, I discovered a new iPod music album I didn’t realise I had. Comprising an unreleased selection of tracks by Janis Joplin, I couldn’t help but admire some of her words, which are so worthy today, they demand reproduction. Reminiscing on my new found love her lyrics framing “Road to Nowhere” were particularly poignant. However, a solitary simple line significantly stood out from all others, so I feel it would be sheer madness not to reveal it in context of this article. Janis screamed (as only she could do) “everyone knows freedom is another word for nothing to lose” at the top of her voice, but why so? Nothing to lose doesn’t seem like freedom to me, Yet, when I consider little people; all those vulnerable slaves to order, it actually becomes second nature for me to redeem Janis’ stark message. “Freedom”, according to those that demand they rule over us, is what they tell us we are allowed to do. Is this the fundamental reason why unprecedented US voting statistics have percolated menacingly for the past decade?

Trump’s diehard supporters are serious. Civil war threats have been tendered against all Democrats. Against the backlog of phony-baloney “COVID” (lest anyone dare research Coronavirus history) austerity, have authorities miscalculated the will of the plebiscite? Perhaps primary sincere reasons for the unnecessary quarantine affront is directly connected to the feared ascension. I say feared here, because, when the ascension erupts in full force, everyone will have no option but to wake up. As past African philosophers have rued; an alert populous is extremely dangerous. Thusly, it is no wonder forlorn teacher Jon Rappoport regularly emphasizes, measures sewn into the education system are designed to diffuse logic. Worse still, they have been in place for years. Obviously that calculative strategy to erase dissent has partial failed, considering the past decade’s electoral disharmony. But how and why has Trump galvanized populism?

Deaf to Robert Kennedy Junior’s emphatic pleas, he did not engage his supposed planned review of tainted vaccines. Nor did I once hear mention of the angry component Thimerosal in his garbled rhetoric. He has done nothing to limit Israel’s supreme authority over the United States. He did not reverse any of Obama’s Globalist backed assiduous erosions of the mighty constitution. His valiant enclave insisting on once and for all truth clarity over “9/11’s” Twin Towers attack fizzled out before it began. So, what has Trump achieved to draw such notorious popular support?

Or is he the wild card that takes the brunt of general hatred towards egalitarian abuses of power paralleling a mythical shadow government agenda?

After reviewing his long list of executive orders, the two that particularly stand out are his repeal of Obama’s prized “Affordable Healthcare Act” and the legitimisation of that notorious Keystone pipeline. He added a further layer of protection defending America’s violent police officers. Attempts to overhaul it have left America without a Department of Justice. “Buy American, Hire American” does appear to tighten up patriotism, so perhaps that is the initiative of appeal. However, from my cursory analysis, formal political change has been dwarfed by iconic bluster so, it seems to me, as usual people have largely fallen for the bullshit. Symptomatically, Trump has morphed into a figurative revolutionary. “We wanted to believe [it was] so it was”. Case in point, in other writings I have emphasized general adherence to facts and truths is incidental. If fantasy mimics popular vision, it will be served up and believed.

Malicious theatricals crafting the phony-baloney Coronavirus “pandemic”, if nothing else, have proven that deceit can be passed off as truth, not universally, but enough to “convince” population majorities. This predicts grave danger for the susceptible. I introduced Dr. Anthony Fauci and entrepreneurial Bill Gates earlier. Fauci is one of the leading masterminds behind promotion of our current fictitious pandemic and was a personal friend of the rogue financier, jailed Bernie Madoff. Furthermore, according to Dr. Judy Mikovits, he ruined her career because of the lies they spun about HIV more than twenty years ago. Incidentally, to repeat, it is her opinion that the current pandemic psy-op is precisely modelled on HIV “safeguard” philosophy. We know that America’s valiant surgeon general rejected the Gates/Fauci (a Centers for Disease Control director) backed contagion model. Other countries did succumb to the globalist wave, but, from American circumstantial data, we learnt that Coronavirus is most likely caused by electromagnetic pollution. Period.

Whereas Fauci has been relatively circumspect, Gates’ initiatives have left a trail of destruction around the globe over the past decade or more. Alarm bells should have been raised amongst the sensitively attuned after his genetically modified mosquitos’ debacle. Last article, I highlighted an alleged international class action against Gates. Although I find zero verification from mainstream sources, an abundance of accusations highlights significant fallout from the Gates Foundation polio vaccine gift to the hill tribes of India. It turns out prior Media hyped philanthropy was simply designed to give evil credibility. From India Gates moved to Africa (just in time for Ebola). There, research insiders (representing the various nations advocated), determined Gates’ vaccine caused more polio than it treated (even though vaccines do not treat illness per Pasteur’s immunization theory), so relevant authorities promptly ejected foundation goodwill. There were other side effects, but these become much more worthy of discussion upon review of “next port”.

Unperturbed, our newly disgraced entourage decided it was fine to accost the peoples of the Philippines. That was next stop on their onerous path. Diabolic ambitions became rather more transparent this time. For some inexplicable reason, while there, Gates decided his vaccine was only worthy for supple, young women. Nevertheless, appreciative authorities didn’t become alarmed until long after side effects were known and knowledge was circulated. Significantly, the in focus pep potion had somehow managed to sterilize Manila’s young ladies. In my first article on Coronavirus, aside from exampling Gates’ father’s well publicized eugenics fanaticism, I referenced a quote from Wikipedia which stated (words to the effect), “sterilization serums do not exist”. Attention was also made to a possible grand “bait and switch” eugenics campaign whereby masses could be “vaccinated” against phony-baloney Coronavirus while the real purpose was to sterilize them. In relation, those murky Georgia Guide Stones were offered as a prime exhibit, which inspired a supplementary $64 question.

How to reduce populations to the demanded 500 million in double quick time without breaking the funeral system?

At my other esoteric website, sometime before Christmas I offered readers an introduction to my miserable circumstances which I explained was courtesy of none other than Australia’s governmental austerity. We haven’t had it too badly (comparing other nations) and, but for Melbourne’s brief drift into soft Martial Law, there have been no lockdowns or “directives” that I know of. Back in March last year, contrary to statisticians’ outpoured waffle, the Sydney job market collapsed. By Christmas, it still hadn’t recovered. Advertisers were regularly less than sincere about motives. In addition, a recruiter told me they were receiving around fifteen times the number of normal expected applications per job. Approximately seventy other bona fide applicants joined me in tendering a proposal dedicated to winning an engaging role offered by a company called “Pragmatic Thinking”. My colourless effort failed to impress. Nevertheless, as if ordained by the highest God, Sydney’s business development/relationship building job market did make an extravagant comeback in the New Year. There were more positions vacant than “usual” (whatever that is) on the 4th January.

Was this evidence of the new employment explosion I predicted and thought would happen mid last year? Figures jagged back to a little above new normal the following day. Clearly the government needed to step in and do something rapidly or the trains would be back to capacity (proposing an even greater mockery of current social distancing compliance). On 6th January, I was forced to venture to the supermarket with my final $7.90 (enough for a paper bread loaf, milk, a small can of sardines and four litres’ of diet tonic water). Travelling “hobo” (I had no money to recharge my prepaid travel card), something seemed odd about my sparcely populated carriage. Perhaps the holy grail (my local shopping centre destination) would reveal all. And, did it just? A sea of ugly muzzled faces, as if drafted from Denver’s sensational airport by those mendacious forces of evil, ambushed my gaze. Sydney’s fifteen percent “permanently afflicted” had spread acute infection to ninety-five per cent of peoples’ overnight (perhaps symptomatic of NSW transport’s “mandatory” face covering initiative). So many were masked, no one seemed to notice my Islamic veil (well, if you can circumcise boys and girls, why not veil them too?) was absent.

Naturally the logical prognoses for this epidemic within a pandemic was two pronged. Fallacious “New World Order” fueled Medias had captivated near universal stupidity. They confirmed normally balanced members of society will morph into morons of the most intense bewilderment because their “TV’s” tell them to do so. Knowledge casts a grim light on any possibility of “the many” being saved prior to the scheduled pre-ascension population purge. Our presumed superficial target is the removal of 95%. This would leave an accordingly “manageable” (as is supposed) stock to fodder the messianic age. And based on that mysterious seven billion global population figure, three hundred and fifty million are posthumously “destined” to survive transition into Brave New World territory. We’ve already seen a glimpse of the powers’ spiteful plan. After the apparent “bait and switch” Norwegian vaccines [caused] deaths, Biden’s “old people die” comment should really hit home, but it won’t. Pfiser’s poison potion may have been too cold to be stored in Australia, according to Media liars, but other less conspicuous sources advised that “trials” had “given” lab-rats HIV.

That aside, to put it bluntly, people are generally playing their roles beautiful as surrogate victims for slaughter, regardless of whether death or impotency is the imposed authoritative choice. No better was this stated when I made another corporate shopping trip to my local Woolworth’s supermarket. As I attempted to enter that store, a rather suspect Indian security guard blocked my path. His face was so well covered; it was impossible to distinguish features. Rudely gesturing with swaying arms, an extended finger seemed to glance my chin. From the whirling black hole that once was a visage transmitted a muffled, accented exclaim, “Please wear your mask”. Looking directly into where his eyes should have been, my pointed response was as indignant as I could make it without being overly threatening. “I’m sorry, I don’t wear a mask”. “I don’t possess one”. Then followed a few moments of stunned silence that lingered for an eternity. Eventually the guard stepped back aghast and meekly whispered, “Oh, you don’t have a mask. Ok, then”, before melting back into his surroundings like a spent vapid ghoul.

It is easy to blame the “powers” for all of this, whereas the people should take responsibility. Though on many occasions I’ve written about dubious double standards precipitating “the system”, such as in my The Mindset of Psychosis, order banks on courting two irredeemable human anti-qualities.  Far from questioning everything, the average man is convinced his belief-systems are infallible. Anthems promising libertarian freedoms routinely brand “alternative” political straightjackets instead. So when Janis Joplin screamed her harsh words “freedom is another word for nothing to lose”, she was predicting failure of government. But this by no means gave sovereignty any ankle-hold or legitimacy. Indeed, the truth is quite the reverse. Sovereignty is generally despised because it empowers “strangers” (or others). Any stranger is the devout enemy of patriotism which means “the other” symptomatically becomes the great existential threat. Those that govern realized the people don’t want freedom long ago. People want either to be part of the greater good or part of the never world where overlooked corruption reigns.

As I valiantly marched on, I couldn’t help reflecting on the security guard’s attitude. The poor fellow so well believed Media fueled pandemic hysteria, he couldn’t account for anyone not actually possessing a mask. If motive here had been cause of better safe than sorry philosophy, I estimate the fellow’s reaction would have been far more muted. As it was, he, in my opinion, aptly captured the mood of the majority of Australians, each and every one hypochondriacs-in-waiting. Decades of aggressive plague “warnings” had primed expectations towards an inevitable disaster. Notable shortages of actual ill and dying has not dinted macabre apprehensive spirit one iota. Therefore, it is clear vaccine producers will struggle to keep pace with appeal for the redemption jab, which is heartening news for the sacred few. Given demand, mandatory terms to best ensure everyone complies would be unlikely. Even if legislation was drafted, wide enforcement should be deemed improbable. Australians are by no means the only lambs to the slaughter. I learn “young people” of Romania will be vaccinated from the beginning of April. Italy has threatened curfew measures for conscientious objectors. If their planned draconian legislation goes ahead, international travelers will each need to provide a vaccination certificate before embarkation. They surely arbitrate a generous role for corrupt doctors n’est pas?

Kevin Rudd “Murdoch’s goons know no shame. Not only do they claim “free expression” to defend violence-inciting hate speech, but they fraudulently invoke the Holocaust [fraud] to claim they are being oppressed”

Thus, shadow government fed & funded pariah Medias crap on eternally, information, piece by piece, fueling maligned belief systems that eventually congregate into populist nirvana. Populist nirvana is contrived to confabulate all laws governing conscience. Perceived need for “group” freedom (or new order) has sponsored worldwide private disobedience which erupts into pockets of civil unrest. America, in particular, is teetering on the brink of civil war; a civil war unlike any other experienced before. No wonder for all that “shill” preparation via alternative Medias over the last two decades. There is motivation behind promoted government law enforcement ammunition stock piles. Construction of numerous FEMA concentration camps will eventually be revealed purposeful. Fanatical zeal applied to the removal of dangerous weapons from the private sector will soon be crystal clear.

I feel compelled to reference the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas again here. Verse 16 “Perhaps people think I have come to cast peace on the world. They do not know that I have come to cast conflicts upon the earth: fire, sword, war. For there will be five in a house: there’ll be three against two and two against three, father against son and son against father, and they will stand alone”. Verse 30 “The Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered nor have they allowed those who want to enter to do so”. Given man’s pathetically weak spiritual state, I have contemplated whether his scheduled ascension might be replaced by an orchestrated synthesis of sorts. Precipitating ancient Atlantis civilisations, Pleiadan “mer” people (Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians | I am Exopolitician, iXossana reincarnated (wordpress.com)) were successfully able to spin honest fantasy in a manner that encouraged uniform communion. Ex. Government Meteorologist, Charles Hall has predicted a strategic “messianic” role for a group of extra-terrestrial he calls the “Tall Whites” (a more up-to-date genetic version of human). I hear rumours from the “brotherhood” that one is located in Rome, Italy. If wider surrounding information is to be believed, he is completely responsible for current macro-directional politics governing Earth affairs. A rigorous top down approach might well have sufficient effect to construct the un-constructible – a Brave New World of unlimited cosmic proportions. The people continue with their blissfully unware for there is nothing to see here.

When “Belief in the Saviour” Teases Corrupt Zeal

Traditionally I have regularly released a Christmas or New Year’s thematic to coincide with the so-called festive season. 2018 has proven to be a latecomer, but I refuse to entirely relax standards. Each winter solstice cycle I increasingly notice how little of Christ [from the Greek] is present in Christmas. For instance, there is now more or less a complete void once occupied by goodwill.

Satan devoured it,” howl the sanctimoniously superstitious

Yet superstitions should never be entirely overlooked. Every reflective proverb invariably contains a grain or more of truth. Current advertising beginning as early as “New Year”, embers of the “Phoenician” commerce coup ignited under concessions of Santa around the turn of the nineteenth century. Great threat Cossack Russia helplessly conquered and with America “under administration”, imperialism was to become the unchallenged voice of reason. Maybe Ebenezer Scrooge wasn’t such a bad stick after all, but I will elaborate on this sentiment in due course.

Before I expose the real corruption of Christ, it is important to clear the air over Santa’s ambiguous comeuppance. Back in Rococo times the ice countries may as well have been classed as the known third world. Few were hardy enough to brave the cold, but for occasioned explorers. These courageous travellers were at liberty to export remote tales of old, particularly when absent of viable bounty. In Santa’s case it seems that two convenient folklores converged as one. Whether any original account has been authentically preserved is unlikely, but, suffice to say, vagrant Norwegian sagas concerning an odd mystic figure (elf?) had proliferated out to “the West” by 1815 or ’20.

Historic development of the Western version is much easier to chart. By reputation, one of America’s New York newspapers made timely broadsheet announcements in December 1773 and the follow year. According to promotional content, Dutch families seasonally congregated to honour Saint Nicholas (a monk renowned for his selfless distribution of charity). Plausibly, theorists claim that Saint Nicholas was issued the pet name Sinter Klaas in the local dialect pronunciation. Evolution to Santa Claus is logically coincidental. Back in the early nineteen century, it should be noted that popular drawings presenting Sinter Klaas in contemporary situations barely resemble modern Santa. That commercial effigy is believed to have been the consequence of a life-sized model placed behind a Philadelphia general store window in 1841.

Scandinavian tales refer to a mystic figure that helped the children, although Christkind (Christ’s child) or Kris Kringle is usually considered the parallel German version. The original name (the one sometimes quoted is not authentic) of the historic figure is perhaps lost to time, but I calculate it was the missing ingredient that promulgated a natural evolution to Santa Claus. My use of the word “natural” here is figurative, of course, as there is a sinister side to this account too. Following Scandinavian myths, from around 1820 American businesses heavily invested in Christmas shopping advertising, strategically placed around heart-warming ditties (one can but assume were) inspired by the Norwegian mystic. Printed message cards were to come in en-masse from the late nineteenth century onwards.

Popular iconography attributed to a North Pole setting was introduced (in the West) by Clement Clark Moore, whose 1822 poem “An Account of a Visit from Saint Nicholas” apparently featured quaint eye-catching illustrations. Thomas Nast, cartoonist for Harper’s weekly, adapted visualisations for a feature spread in 1881 which made popular acclaim. Embedded traditions of present day rotund gentleman clad in cheery red suit gestated in the 1890’s. Promptly exploited by the Salvation Army, homeless men dressed in seasonal costumes were commissioned to venture out with the aim of collecting funding donations.

Masonic involvement in the creation of the United States of America is beyond dispute. Whether fabled Illuminati power brokers were the key instrumental agents will possibly never be authentically known or provable. What is unarguably clear is the American union was never set up for the people or, rather, if it was, “the people” were undoubtedly the select few. Propagandists went to work in earnest well before the United States was ratified as “one”. Corresponding messages promoting Christmas spirit in favour of commerce highlighted the ambitions of those that established the new republic. This style of subliminal tradition persevered throughout the occurring human rights’ transformation, perhaps persuasively haunted by Charles Dickens 1843 masterpiece “A Christmas Carol”. Incidentally, British Dickens had also written his Parish Boy’s Progress (more commonly known as Oliver Twist) serial 1837-39 which coincided (sic) with the Abolition of Slavery Act (1837).

I wrote about the truth behind abolition last article and inasmuch stated that no philanthropic goodwill should be attributed to the end of slavery. Human rights were reduced to tatters in order to fortify the needs of burgeoning commerce. One of the significant causal effects, in addition to labour exploitation, unprecedented spikes in crime and prostitution, was the emergence of numerous social charities. I have written about charities independently before too. If governments were truly set up exclusively for the people, then each charity must be viewed as a breakdown of order that highlights supreme jurisdictional incompetence. Today there are supposedly tens of millions of charitable causes which emphasises the ineptitude of governmental social charters. But there is another side to the conspiracy. Great writers like Dickens rarely (if ever) meaningfully expose the indelible link between charity and trade. Charities usually place funds in the care of the banking system available to purchase goods or services before converting them into “aid”. Funds not needed “in the field” are invariably locked into attractive interest bearing long term deposits. British “custodian of charities” (a corporate collective catering for tens of thousands of organisations) used to be listed second place below British Telecom at the stock exchange, so it is a lucrative cash cow.

Dickens’ squint vision is enough to convince me he worked for the overlords. Why else would have he been allowed to make fame and fortune? If his writings had viciously attacked “the system”, no one would know of them today. Without doubt his “hallmark” powerfully creative style made endorsement decision making easy. His deeply human approach surely would have been considered gravy topping by his endorsers. For example, “A Christmas Carol” (or “Scrooge”) did highlight the plight of the working classes, but the manner as to how merchants and those that governed exploited working classes was matter of fact, the way things are. In effect, Dickens ended up posthumously begging for charity from his betters. That was the limit of his militancy. Indeed, in the Victorian age knowing your place had been a very long standing belief attached to birth provenance (i.e. the result of karmic deliverance). Perhaps this is why he was allowed to paint such a bleak picture. Other of his novels feature “poor houses” (paid slavery) and debtors’ prisons, so it would be unfair not to lightly applaud aspects of his pioneering effort towards social conscience.

In fact he was far from the only dissenting voice of that era. Beginning with comparatively humble numbers from the late eighteenth century onward, by high Victorian times published attacks on “the system” had just about reached fever pitch. A significant side effect to all this is worth exploring. There have been many revisions of the English Bible, from the seventh century AD. A formal Revised Standard Version of the New Testament was first published in 1881 and this was largely a consequence of inertia of “social conscience movements” (notably who were alarmed by the excess of prostitution) in my opinion. British politicians such as William Gladstone expressed their dedication to God (apparently regularly administering sermons to fallen women), although it seems ironic that these individuals have been responsible for imposing some of the most acrid and draconian legislation on the people.

Cultivation of various popular “beacons of hope” was burgeoning commerce’s key strategy investment geared to combating radical dissent in such forms as suffrage protest. Christmas Santa was one such icon. It seems to me that it has been no accident seasonal spirit appears to engage commerce at any opportunity. In that capacity, Santa is the Christmas star perched on a commerce peak. Dickens’ criticism of Scrooge’s lack of commercial goodwill by not paying staff adequately empowered seasonal trading. For lack of better words, when [otherwise] slaves are affluent enough, they can buy more goods and chattel to ensure business perpetually booms. Broadsheets promoted charitable initiatives favouring trade long before the US republic (1789) was established. Santa, by hook or by crook, became a convenient figurehead or mascot. However, review of naming protocols places dark questions regards the ethics and ambitions of those that pioneered the Grotto cult. There is more to Santa Claus than is obvious.

Far from being a saviour, he has been known to splinter families consumed by obsessive greed. Those without funds sufficient for merriment (as Dickens bitterly highlights) are ostracised by “goodwill”. There is a giant clue as to why this is so, but I first need to provide a little background before I detail it. My other website offers many articles that cover esoteric and paranormal affairs. Coincidentally Satan was the feature of one long essay there. I say coincidentally because it is fairly well known that Santa also happens to be an anagram of Satan. In normal circumstances one would put the fact down to quirks of language, but can we be sure connections are accidental or arbitrary here?

Explanations will become a little complex because I first need to allay popular confusion over origins and meaning of Satan. In fact, while I am about it, I may as well cover doppelganger Lucifer too. Satan, for instance, is a very ancient term that stretches back long prior to Atlantis. Sanskrit is the closest dialect I have found representative of the “universal” first language that failed to survive Atlantis’ downfall (hinted at in biblical Genesis’ Tower of Babel). In that regard, perhaps all words were originally collective monotones and, with this in mind, Satan conveniently breaks into “sat” and “an”. In Sanskrit pronunciation reflectively impacts word values, so “sat” and “an” could each be attributed to mean many different things. Therefore, in the interest of correctness, I have had to draw on inherent sources to establish compelling historic and interpretative basis from considerations.

“An” is the easy part. Several ancient tongues use the syllable to signify “Almighty God”. In combination with Almighty God, various meanings of “sat” might satisfy differing wider metaphoric interpretations. Though the fact appears to have escaped surviving chronicles, Satan was the first star to ever bless the cosmos (actually initially revered as the Blessed Star). All stars deliver light. In spiritual context, light is sometimes called logos (which is the Greek word for information). Spiritually, “logos” extends way beyond mere information. It is the essence of truthful purity or, in other words, the word of God. “Sat” is the Sanskrit equivalent of this conceptualisation. Lucifer admirably compares. That name derives from the Latin and means “light” (lux) “standard” (fer). Morning Star (Lucifer) competing with the sun (Ra) as it rises based on biblical Isaiah’s (an unrepentant Pharisee) radical sermon is generally regarded as the significant origin of the usage.

Also worthy of mention, Akhenaten’s Amon (usually erroneously referred to as Amen) conspicuously forms an “Almighty God” (A-n) sandwich casing “m’o” (divine record) filling. Thus, strictly speaking Satan, Lucifer and Amon/Amen all mean the same thing (more or less), which is bringer of good news. Actually, wasn’t that what they called Jesus too? Nevertheless, I have explained elsewhere how the general message over time has been twisted into opposite meanings by miscreants with rogue agendas. Today the direct effect is both Satan and Lucifer have been reversed from bringers of good news to evil omens. Specifically, Satan [in Hebrew tongue] simply means accuser. The development of Satan as “the tempter” did not emerge until the late sixteen century, though attributing philosophies were clearly embedded in Martin Luther’s earlier rhetoric. Luther (himself a Jesuit) strongly influenced contemporary masonic alliances. Masonry is not the sinister cabal delineated by superstition. Merchants would normally associate themselves with one group or another in order to network out of trading necessity. The massively beneficial spin off was it made collusion and coordinated commerce strategies possible.

Not all collaborations were gracious. When stakes were high, gross acts of tyranny or injustice were sometimes deemed “end justifying”. One such conspiracy toppled Britain’s constitutional monarch Charles I, who was beheaded on 30th January 1649 as a consequence. Even so, after that atrocious standard had been set, beginning with his son puppet king Charles II’s reinstatement, the universal demise of sovereign royal power is probably best marked by Catherine “the Great” (no wonder they call her great) of Russia’s turbulent reign. Violent anarchism was an offshoot of that operation. Since Michael Romanov’s (nephew of Ivan the Terrible) 1613 accession to the Russian throne, there had always been disturbance with Cossack settlers (displaced Polish serfs who termed themselves “free men”). In accordance, numerous popular uprisings against authorities have been reported from 1591. Out of all these, it is the 1768 Ukrainian (Koliyivshchyna) religious massacre that probably most pertinently marks an authority shift. Reputation says killing was sparked by Catherine the Great’s “Golden Charter” (1765) which enabled retired colonel and cleric Maksim Zalizniak’s ambitions. Their joint mission was dedicated to purging Catholics and other religious minorities.  Politically correct historians are quick to denounce the Golden Charter (which also targeted Jews) as “utter fantasy” in order to preserve the queen’s “spotless” reputation.

Encyclopaedia Britannica’s first edition is dated 1770. From 1770-75 Russia is proclaimed the world’s greatest nation. By 1776 she may as well have been a sickly dog.  Many theories attribute reasons leading to the country’s downfall, but it seems to me that government ownership of the Orthodox Church from 1721 marked the beginning of the end so to speak. Post revolution “Communist” Jew Leon Trotsky’s unrelenting all-reaching attack on that administration was certainly no coincidence. Populations had been galvanised by the church. Replace it with alternative convenient social apparatus and you have society in your pocket. Russians were (and perhaps still are) extremely parochial and rather superstitious. This is well highlighted by the way they celebrate Christmas. According to legend, Babouschka (old woman or granny) misled the three kings (search for Christ) by giving the wrong directions. The Russian birth date for “Jesus’” is 6th January but festivities honour Babouschka’s eternal regret for her deceit.

Historians might convincingly argue fledgling United States of America’s journey to superpower status began in 1776 (phoenix rising from mother Russia’s ashes?). Constitutional democracy ended in 1789 when the republic (in Philistine Greece and Italy’s wake?) was formed (and currency changed), but it took until 1864 (ushering in the 14th Amendment to the constitution) for government to be reduced to a corporation. Commerce was the primary reason the United States was formed but it took the best part of a century (1776-1864) for satanic agents to exact their full plan. Today all governments (and their tax offices) are corporations and that is why the modern world is held to ransom by merchant bankers. I find it mildly ironic that it is in the powers’ best interests for people to “wake up” to truth which is of next to no advantage to egregious saviours’ causes. This suggests, at the very least, that all (or the majority of) revolution philosophies have been sponsored by the precise same powers that impose tyranny. These false rites of passage were sponsored because the deceivers knew they were guaranteed dead ends.

To define true evil, I regularly reference a quote attributed to the great sage Krishna “Spirituality (impetus behind creation) brings to freedom, whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What better way to paralyse than by introducing appealing commerce. Humanity would not be able to resist aiding and abetting the devil (d-evil). I don’t refer to the satisfaction of genuine “needs” here, although commerce can accommodate those too. No, here I exclusively identify non-essential extras; frills of commerce. Some argue that the introduction of pomp surrounding royalty (which has endured so long) is pointless. Lemurian monarchs for periods that precede historic record were visually indistinguishable from the people. Very ancient kings were blessed with God-like powers. They could be distinguished by deed. Today certainly, beyond their overstated assigned status and privileged upbringing, royals are no different to the everyman. At Christmas, pomp and celebration of non-essential extras is now encapsulated by iconic smirking Santa which suggests it is those behind commerce that crafted the whole idea of aristocratic superiority.

Is the clue in Santa’s name; perfect anagram of Satan? By the time of this red frocked (isn’t the devil usually depicted coloured red?) tempter’s universal notoriety, negative connotations of Satan were firmly entrenched. Indeed, so much so no one had heard of the Blessed Star (in relation to the creation of our universe) by then. Such is the case today as well of course. I presented some detail in relation to the truth (and reasoning behind it) that negative Satan was actually originally the mispronunciation of “Saturn” (from medieval times, although I think this reflects attitudes under Prophet Zoroaster thousands of years before) in this article. “Design” of Santa appears to vaguely follow the Babylonian Horus myth. Indestructible God could only be chopped up and hidden. In this instance “An” has been remorselessly sliced in two, “n” crudely wedged between “sa” and “t”. “A” brings up the rear and represents perennial impotence of spirituality under Santa’s spell. God is vanquished (decapitated) and his wisdom (sat) corrupted.

But for Babouschka, Christmas (Epiphany) would be mostly a hangover from the Pagan era. Evergreen trees (in particular) represent celebration of the winter solstice. From time memorial, tradition has always seen exchange of gifts, but pagans honoured their harvest, so communities would contribute fresh fruits and vegetables for the benefit of society. “The Feeding of Five Thousand” New Testament parable was scripted by Mark (or Marcus, a Roman aristocrat) and therefore one should question its purpose all the more. Though communal sharing of fish and loaves suggests so, it is unlikely Jesus (Josephus) ever administered a true harvest festival dedicated to the winter solstice. The Romans, on the other hand, did worship solar cycles. Sun-day is a tribute to that legacy. Per context, the alert may struggle to fathom why I bother to discuss this now, given Jesus’ notorious “Jewish” status. Let me explain why. Long prior to Roman involvement, Judaism had split in two. City folks followed autocratic regimes promulgated by those generally known as Pharisees. It is a style of “order” remains alive and well today, underpinning up-to-date management of global affairs. Back then remote, displaced tribes were guided by (what the right-wingers’ would term) superstitious philosophies which prepared for different “ways of life”.

Their brand of raw spirituality was in fact encapsulated by the essence of numerous of splinter groups and these had journeyed out to the four corners of the globe in search of paradise (colloquially referred to as Promised Land). One such autonomy was the foundation of ancient druids (not even vaguely similar to garish abuse, late eighteenth century neo-druidism). Rural “Essene” Jews were labelled Gnostics for a while. Though historians remember it as a new tradition from the time of Jesus, it is likely the 570BC exodus to Ireland (Promised Land designate) consisted of likeminded parties of anti-Levite (Pharisaic law makers) “revolutionaries”. These embers of civilisation plausibly could have “morphed into” the later druidic tradition, made more notorious by Avalon (spiritual centre and first mystery school?), which is located in southern England. If memory serves me correctly, America’s Pilgrim Fathers formally constituted a southern English gathering in search of purity. The point I am trying to make is there has been a persisting religious dichotomy ever since man reflected on his divinity. Judaism, God forbid, is probably one of the better examples of that

Celebration of the solstices seems a likely component of Gnostic tradition. Unfortunately, other than newly found (and possibly censored) bundles of esoteric texts hidden in Dead Sea catacombs and other discreet places, evidence of that faith was destroyed long ago. Neo-druids make a big hullaballoo over solstice traditions whereas I suspect the Gnostics treated these occasions as opportunities to educate. What better way to manufacture goodwill while celebrating nature could there be than a harvest festival? The idea of community sharing for everyone’s benefit is instilled in “The Feeding of Five Thousand” parable. Did Mark’s account confuse a solstice event? Perhaps we’ll never know, but, per context, the fish and loaves are distinct spiritual symbols and shouldn’t be viewed liberally. Celts (original druids) in particular revered divinity as something directly attributed to creative potence. They determined that all life came from primordial waters (something modern science propagandises?). If primordial waters constitute God’s physicality, then fishes’ mastery of oceans must be inspirationally hallowed. The Lord’s Prayer “praises God for our daily bread”.

Tribes, such as those that became the druids, who didn’t revere pharisaic order, separated and found new havens (free of tyranny) to root. It is difficult to pinpoint the precise transition which is the branch that became modern day Judaism. Hebrew was originally a cut down cosmic script. For instance, additional unknown letters are occasionally seen interspersed with Hebrew on downed alien spaceships’ insignia. It is known that today’s long standing Yiddish culture backed off New Hebrew because Old Hebrew was insufficient for competent business communication. The “pointing” of Hebrew text (which in practicality adjusts for a new language) possibly coincided with first world universal adoption of stamped currency (legal tender). Accurate dates are deliberately vague on origins of pointing; maybe 12th, 13th or 14th century depending on opinions. Does this vainly cover up the Khazarian Yiddish pact emanated from the Ukraine? As an aside, though the Ukraine is sometimes volunteered, it could not have possibly ever been fabled Khazaria as that land mass is submerged under oceans today. There is however compelling innuendo that posits for a plausible case recommending the Ukraine is viewed as the motherland by certain estranged Pharisees.

Few bother to even attempt to comprehend the severe civil consequences of legal tender. Enslaved populations are the product of oppressive and tyrannous welfare states which cannot exist unless supported by currency. Therefore, industrialist vipers initially introduced serfdom gradually, confusing the “free” into believing that this was an effect of their zealous benevolence. Once everyone was “captured”, oligarchs expanded traditional uses of prisons for purposes of “containing” those whom they did not want to socially enable (crude justifications supported by laws came later). Bonded slavery became the only viable social security option for those displaced by war, famine or for other reasons.

Truth surrounding vile treachery of the Magna Carta (marking the point at which silver currency exploded) is obscured by cheery tales of Robin Hood and his band of crafty thugs. As a treaty, it wasn’t a charter of goodwill towards the people. It in fact was open theft of free lands and the negotiated common rights of man. Courtesy of the Magna Carta, the vast majority of our modern populations could not live off the land effectively now, even if we were forced to do so and that is why industrialists lord over the document’s prowess so heartily. Rich or poor, mighty or lowly, we have all by some measure been transformed into slaves of currency. They say money makes the civilised world go round. That is why those with the most money invariably have all the privileges.

Where it came from God only knows, but there is a tragic old wives’ tale that supposes the ills of humanity are the fault of the Midas effect. Those with wealth are singled out as evil doers even though everyone (without exception) is greedy (sometimes euphemised as will to survive). The humble do not know extravagance so they neither desire nor solicit it. Most elites merely exploit human nature to the hilt, though they may not be fully cognisant of the fact. The reason Santa has become so popular is he epitomises the averice of the masses. That is more than amply highlighted in Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol”. Goodwill is leveraged to such effect that crippled “Tiny Tim” deserves to have the litter of his family’s desires steeped on him at Christmas for merely existing. Of course this selfish anthem ignores those hard to rectify gaping double standards. Why would “rich” Scrooge bestow gifts on relative strangers in place of his own loved ones? The real issue, how Tiny Tim’s father persevered under such irresponsible employment terms, is not discussed.

Well, they didn’t have unions then”, screams a heckler

Incorrect, but it will take an eternity for sovereign man to grow a backbone. The power of labour values ironically has always been very much in the hands of the people. If everyone refused work and put death as the preference over slavery, currency would have been rendered valueless from conception and commerce would have never commenced (in the known sense). From the point currency was introduced, a utopian objective has been to shackle the broad masses. Peer group infiltration and targeted populism were the chosen control strategies (branded psyops) used to fulfil the objective. From the day men communicated with each other, money (cuts of silver, gold talents, precious beads) and other arbitrary tokens of value have always been used to supplement barter trade.

Currency is different. Units are stamped by (and the overriding possession of) an administrative authority. Originally that would have been a constitutional royal. Now stock ownership is hybrid. Who is this Federal Reserve? Those that use the merchandise are subject to governing philosophies and rules. A dollar cannot morph into a million units of value because “someone” decides this is so, whereas administrative overseers might revalue a dollar if they decided the act was politically expedient. Germany’s inflation was a deliberate act. Other competing paper currencies were only partially backed by gold, but the illustrious Federal Reserve turned a blind eye. Whilst apparently contractually bound as servants (polite word for slaves) of government, they were able to turn a blind eye because they own all “backed” circulated money.

Wholesale cash enterprises were developed first by the Greeks and then by the Romans, even though the oldest surviving currency (assuming science is correct) originates from Russia. Subsequent European coinage values were extensions of the Roman legacy. It would be hard to formally prove (particularly as reference maps show Philistinia approximates the modern Palestinian territory region), but logic supposes that the Greeks and Romans were descendants of relocated Philistines (tall pale skinned warriors). Retreating from defeat by Babylonian Pharaoh and “Jewish” King David, Philistines first settled in Greece (on the doorstep of the Middle East). Since “great” Alexander’s conquest to rule the world ran out of steam, Greek politics apparently favoured secular complacency over global conquest. Hamstrung industrialists shifted their affairs to Italy and, over several centuries, built sufficient military infrastructure to commit to their globalist ambitions once more.

Incidentally, not at all Middle Eastern in appearance, then Babylonian peoples would have been classed as “Caucasians” by today’s sciences. Therefore notorious King David would have been a white man. Though only circumstantial evidence supports claims he was a Pharaoh, inherent sources advise me information is relatively accurate (i.e. the wrong pharaoh is referenced as culprit), which places grave questions as to the authenticity behind the popular legacy of Israel of course. History is far from circumspect here. For example those dreadful “Greek” Hyksos Kings that “conveniently” appeared to take rule when Babylon was lacking authority were likely Philistines, yet Josephus eerily reports them as Israelites. I say these were the first usurpers; these were Pharisees who support a fabricated Levite Alta ego.

By deduction, this would mean the “great” Caesar was a Philistine as well. Limited writings about him present a grave paradox. According to surviving texts, he was some kind of popular miracle working Ben Hur. Such are the qualities of his proposed divinity; some might rightly be compelled to believe he was Jesus. Of course this adds to the case that persuades Mark was a Roman aristocrat who cast Jesus in the Homeric style, perhaps even as an attempt to preserve the image of Caesar. The evocation would have made both instantly popular figures even if real lives didn’t quite live up to the reputation. Infiltration of peer groups and targeted populism is achieved in one fell swoop. More evidence is as follows. Peer group infiltration is embodied by Mark “Iscariot’s” treacherous conversion to Gnosticism (and later St Paul’s Damascus Road epiphany). There is no more popular false occult icon than Jesus.

Prognosis therefore is depressingly melancholy. Beyond the use of occasional repeated proverbs, not a single book found in the New Testament even vaguely resembles authentic Essene philosophy, including “John”. Scholars that first take the plunge and brave any of the Dead Sea Scrolls’ codexes are quick to notice the profound intellectual depth of content (making embedded philosophies extraordinarily hard to interpret correctly). Gospel writer Mark was Roman, Luke Greek and Matthew was a cosmopolitan Jew and obvious agent of the Pharisees. Enigmatic John didn’t exist, but the name (in its use) implies “God’s secretary”. His, the Fourth Gospel, was dictated by Josephus (as Jesus) through brother-in-law scribe Lazarus. One word only of Jesus’ personal volume has survived. Someone (perhaps many) in authority knows the truth about this.

Jesus’ own gospel was purposefully destroyed and the celebrated surviving second century papyrus was not a copy. It is a forgery. If it had been authentic, how could the document have dodged Philistine Constantine’s mighty fourth century purge?  Outright censorship of texts that contradicted or impeded Sol Invictus faith was the only literary amnesty of his inquisition. Catholicism’s Papacy was the removed Roman monarchy; therefore it was also yet another Philistine/Pharisee offshoot. The reason St Paul (author of New Testament Corinthians, Romans and so on) is occasionally recognised as the first pope (and last apostle) is to give his detestable writings (which smother any occasional glint “free of Romanisation” emulating the conscience of Jesus) greater credibility (and popularity, of course). Paul’s calculated role generally seems to suggest sour grapes after good times gone awry. Should the “Ideal” Jesus have gracefully “wallpapered” the uncomfortable political “marriage” between the Pharisees and de facto Royalty?

Look, I’m not sure when the Sanhedrin originally came into being or whether it really matters, but I notice a familiar pattern with “world affairs” stretching back at least the most part of two and a half thousand years. History informs me the Romans conquered lands located in the region now called the Middle East. Their haul included Israel (conquered by Assyrians centuries before). A consequence of one of the first acts of power was to usher in hybrid Arab (ethic nomads that roamed Aram or were these Assyrians or even Phoenicians?) royals to rule over Judea (separatist Southern Israel). First “despot” of the official Promised Land Moses (who compares well against England’s Oliver Cromwell) never referred to arbitrary bodies when making decisions. Tradition (after the burning bush) revered him as the direct link to God. All great prophet kings follow identical protocol, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Noah and the rest. Their decisions were their own and these “commandments” were a testament upholding their uniformly breath taking “greatness”. Nevertheless, when the Sanhedrin (or royal court) emerged sovereign rule was doomed to wither. Under Israel’s Roman occupation, that evolution was furiously ignited.

Though government is meant to be a mix of identities that reflect the goodwill of society, by reputation decision making almost always errs towards right wing (fascist) mindset. Values imposed by Sanhedrin courts depressingly crafted that motif

Reflecting on contemporary politics of Jesus’ age, overbearing Roman authority paid lip service to the whims of their puppet Arab monarchs provided they observed all the wishes of the Pharisees (who took the high seat in the Sanhedrin). That said, certain Roman emperors didn’t see things their way. Look how these (such as Caligula and Nero) have been “painted” (i.e. utter fabrication) by “history”. Judea was abandoned (allegedly) after the 66-69AD siege of Jerusalem (a chain reaction sparked by earlier infractions under Nero). Within moments of the exodus a new fully fledged “Christian” hierarchy pops up in Alexandria. Infrastructure is so strong; its governing church is effectively born as a corporation. Therefore, transferring authority to Constantinople was child’s play after the papacy was formally established in the late fourth century.

Emergence of this virgin Catholic Church exactly coincides with the shocking disappearance of the great Roman Empire. Over several centuries, the same Catholic Church made a bee-line to exert control over every single credible European monarchy. This is more than amply highlighted by records of battles against the Merovingian kings, which included the calculated murder of Dagobert II. The Catholic Church had become (by accident or design) a sort of universal Sanhedrin, which is made all the more interesting because the Jewish version abandoned its administrative authority after the second temple (though some argue it never existed) was “allegedly” levelled by fire. Thus far I have contemplated numbers of suggestions that could never be “proven”, but could it be argued the Nicolaitans were instrumental at re-establishing the defunct Sanhedrin apparatus in Constantinople?

There is more fuel for the fire, if we move the clock forward a bit. King Henry VIII of England did the unthinkable in 1534. After a bitter divorce with Spanish royal Catherine of Aragon, he excommunicated the pope and formed his own Church of England. That is why the vicious catholic versus protestant wars persisted long after his death. Thomas Moore chose death in absence of moral sovereignty, but the rot had begun to set in long before, even while bonny Henry was still in power. The Roman “Sanhedrin” had only been temporarily usurped by the monarch. It wasn’t long before Henry was surrounded by pious advisors, such as prominent “world’s richest man” Cardinal Woolsey. Only a smidgen over a century after Henry’s desperate act, pharisaic authorities decided they needed to well and truly shore things up (and claim deserved revenge). This culminated with the execution death of Charles I in 1649 mentioned earlier, of course.

For the first time in history (unlike the Greek and Roman Republics before) a civilian government shielded power beneath “protector” Cromwell, but fame went to his head and he proved more deistic than any king. That is the ostensive reason behind the government’s swift (1660) re-establishment of the British monarchy, which remains intact today. It was deemed an essential safety measure against any parochial ruling authority. King William’s 1696 rushed though Bill of Rights amply acknowledges the viperous nature of man (particularly when given responsibility). To the best of my knowledge, every subsequent constitution (such as America’s) has built in its own bill of rights. For the record, though we have been programed to believe that royal executive power was devoid of peer oversight prior to corporate takeover, the myth simply isn’t true. Monarchs were presumed appointed by God (perhaps after Moses) and, as such, bound to honour their constituents. Suffice to say some kings turned out more attentive than others. That in mind, when factoring in the emergence of outsourced legislation via organs such as the Sanhedrin, the deep question I find rather hard to resolve is “who was the last true king?”

Who is the rightful king is important. Gospel writer Matthew’s biblical genealogy was aimed at promoting Jesus as the hereditary Messiah (priest-king or “Christ” subject to certain terms and conditions), but was it David or Zechariah (Jesus’ uncle) that established precedence? Zechariah was not a pharaoh nor did he have any conceivably legitimate claim to Babylonian rule. Pharaoh David set up the twenty four priestly branches (spawning king making material) that were each to be deemed valid natural contenders for the Jewish throne. It seems to me that without intimate understanding of David or any of the many hierarchical values that bestowed him with power, ignorance over what substantiates “royalty” from pedestrian “rank and file” will perennially reign. Usurpers naturally capitalise on this schism. Indeed, the truth would be enough to bring down their phoney baloney house of cards.  Dissenting historians irregularly report of the wisdom of the Oannes, but where is it to be found now?

Jesus is fantasy, a marketing brand that coordinates a very special historic period. He was the event which preceded Philistine formal grasp of absolute power. Therefore, modern traditions that prepare a muted, ineffective “Saviour” emphasise corporate will to control (Scrooge had absolute autonomy over directions of conscience). In other words, when the huddled masses are suitably impoverished and hope lacking, their only alternative is to turn to corporate commerce (big government) for succour. That is predominantly why the “machine” has relentlessly pushed a socialist agenda over the last hundred years or so. Now the hundred years is up, we are very close to “end game”. Australia’s prime minister is a billionaire (or so rumour has it). America’s president Trump is a tycoon. America is the first “first world” country. Australia is the last “first world” dominion. This tells anyone that understands the “code” that the oligarch’s are now brash enough to boast “we’ve won and there’s nothing [you] the people can do about it”.

I have written about the truth behind Jesus “the person” at length before, but it is worth repeating additional detail again to bring some extra clarity to this essay. Anagrammatised Josephus equates to “give birth to Jesus” in Latin tongue. It is such a clever anagram; “metaphor” is implied through use of letters P, H and O. I am also aware that “J” is obsolete so, in this case, whatever normally replaces it works just as well. One of the apocryphal books casts the young Jesus so well educated in theological matters it is presumed he was the son of a High Priest. Josephus’ father was Matthias Joseph, a High Priest of the 24th line from David (i.e. as illustrated earlier, royal blood). Militant Jesus attacking money changers at the temple was so contextually uncharacteristic, whoever it was clearly wasn’t preaching Jesus (isn’t it “odd” that Philistine Catholicism forbade money lending entirely on those grounds and this legitimised Jewish banking, coincidence?). Sermon on the Mount from Matthew’s Gospel presents a pensively angry prophet, but not a violent one. My inherent sources report that the young militant man was none other than Jesus’ (or, rather, Josephus’) father (who also used the codename Barabbas).

According to these sources, in his youth, Matthias Joseph joined the revolutionary movement and was impassioned by the royal cause against Roman tyranny. Because Arab puppet kings met most (if not all) of the Pharisees’ wishes, Zealots (as these revolutionaries became known) were doubtlessly not too fond of the extreme right-wing establishment either. This presents a problem for those determined to rationalise the truth, which is embroiled in politics that are quite complicated. To extend my observation of the young revolutionary Barabbas who attacked the money changers, he was arrested and convicted of a serious offense. Theologians that have bothered to study contemporary Roman law almost universally agree that Jesus did nothing (as visually evident in the numerous religious records) to warrant arrest, less crucifixion. Roman Philistines did impose very harsh penalties (up to death) on any party that disrupted the supply chain (commerce). Moneychangers at the temple would have provided commercial supply and they were undeniably [violently] disrupted by Barabbas (under pseudonym).

The physical crucifixion event (per its convenient placement in various New Testament writings) was used metaphorically. I shall discuss metaphorical terms shortly. For now, let me focus on the event. Some have noted that the crucifixion was conducted on private land, which was unusual. In Jesus’ case, this would imply that Barabbas was either extremely rich, well connected or both. The land, we learn, belonged to prominent local business man Joseph of Arimathea, whose international business holdings were reputedly centred at Cornwall, England (Gnostic-Druid heartland). Josephus’ scribe was Lazarus, son of Joseph of Aramithea. Jesus’ “wife” was Mary Magdalene, Lazarus’ sister, so there are logical family connections here. As Miriam (Mary) has rather negative connotations (suggesting bereavement) in ancient Hebrew, it is not widely used. Mary, on the other hand was a very popular contemporary Roman given name, particularly in royal circles, as it bestowed heritage. Given this background, I am already questioning whether there was an actual crucifixion, whether the event was purely metaphorical? Ancient chroniclers were afforded great liberty in the way they expressed themselves. Therefore knowing how to read between the lines correctly is the key to understanding hallowed texts.

Before I discuss validity of the crucifixion in more depth, I need to make a few more associated observations. Presumption Mary Magdalene was never called Miriam suggests she was prominent Roman offspring. Could this mean the Joseph of Aramithea had taken a Roman Philistine wife? Was she of royal lineage (hence selecting Mary as the given name for her daughter)? I am compelled to believe that she would have been extremely important for Joseph to be on first name terms with Pontius Pilate, Roman Governor of Judea. Turning to Inherent sources once more, I am informed that a royal marriage was brokered between Barabbas (Jesus’ father) and another Mary. If, as some scholars like to posit, Jesus was a family member of the Piso emperor class, that lineage could only have come via his mother (as his father was a Jewish royal). Should this prove sufficiently correct, it would explain why the Catholic Church gives the Madonna such bloated “eternal” status against puny “dead” Jesus on the cross. Congregations from all over the globe flock to touch her miracle working effigies.

Presuming a marriage had been brokered between “Mary” (euphemistically known as mother of Jesus) and Matthias Joseph (father of Josephus who “gave birth to” and was literal Jesus), contemporary politics would have been revolutionised (endorsing the Pharisees’ political intrigue). In conjunction, the undeniably hard to resolve question is “why did the Pharisees back clemency in favour of Barabbas (father of Jesus)?” unless there is more to solving the puzzle than meets the obvious eye.  Does this suggest that Jesus was a recalcitrant heir (hinted at in the Prodigal Son parable)? If Matthias Joseph was an integral part of the establishment, then Josephus almost certainly defied the wishes of the father. Failure of his preaching tour in the Nazareth region highlights the discontentment. Nazareth, at the time, was a hub for the well-to-do and privileged classes, so naturally political preferences erred towards hard-line right-wing philosophies. One can but presume that Matthias Joseph, as the bastion of civilised society and honoured revolutionary, had strong ties to religious order (i.e. the Pharisees). Josephus was comparatively Bohemian (again implied in the Prodigal Son parable).

Whilst alien to traditional Gnostic writings, all Gospels identify Jesus as a renegade preacher who associated with undesirables (“outcasts”). He is both against the rooted establishment (though quotes from “Law” at every opportunity) and oppressed civilisation (measuredly). Socialist content embedded in sermons would fare so well, proverbs have been adopted by modern day democracy movements. Courtesy of his royal status, Josephus did have friends in high places that shielded him, but they were still pillars of mundane society that were forced to corrupt certain values to remain in power (and use aliases when assisting renegade causes). This is perhaps casually camouflaged by Jesus’ association with outcasts (inwardly well meaning, but outwardly dishonest). Therefore modern day belief in “the Saviour” relies on corrupt zeal. Zeal, in turn, has transformed into a fanaticism cultivated by corporate religions. Individual beliefs are singular matters of faith, whereas idolatries become authorities for those that chose to apply “so called” blind faith (a grotesque form of ignorance).

Individual beliefs must be questioned to improve constancy, whereas determined authority erodes opportunity for zealous fidelity

Jesus would share Josephus’ birth year of 37AD, unless historic accuracy is obscured here. There are niggling problems with this date particularly when factoring in the most practical chronology allowing for his two and a half year ministry. The Siege of Jerusalem is the obvious choice as a correlating time period which I would say is the only plausible term of upheaval within range significant enough to profitably bolster a prophetic preacher’s missionary tour. His audience would have predominantly been Jews recoiling from ever widening Roman reprisals. Under such conditions, the siege must have been deemed the “final straw”. Adding to my case, Jesus’ journey has been retraced by geographical experts. Median chronology fits against the siege timeline like a glove, therefore I deduce the ministry ran from 64-66AD and that is why the first Gospel by Mark was published sometime after 68AD (long enough to source witnesses, conduct interviews, correlate notes, write, edit and publish a manuscript). There was no oral period as has been “supposed”, because it made no sense anyway. The contemporary Jewish connotation of what was meant by “Messiah” (then) is very different to the hybrid evolution (distortion) that prepares our modern day Catholic sacrificial Son of God “Christos” (or Christ) who “died for our sins”.

Considering proximity against the siege, details of Josephus’ geographic movements do appear to cultivate the “swashbuckler dodging authorities” narrative line. That’s why Jerusalem under siege was last stop – a fait accompli. According to Matthew’s Gospel, one of Jesus’ first acts (after collecting his posse of disciple bodyguards) was to request baptism from his cousin John (son of Zechariah). Traditionally a Jew reached maturity at age thirty, yet was the 37AD birthdate to be correct, then Josephus would have been twenty seven years old if the chronological positioning was accurate. Although the Roman equivalent was age twenty five, there is another explanation. Hebrew chroniclers did not necessarily place events in correct historic order. Prosperity very much justified the means. It seems more likely, in which case, that Jesus was baptised at the end of his ministry when he had built experience worthy of exalted blessing. Authority did not make purges against perceived threats until after the siege (identifying why there was a rapid exodus away from the region directly after 70AD). That is when John the Baptist (contender for the Jewish throne) would have lost his head. Josephus was only spared from the inquisition because of his royal Roman blood.

Mentioned earlier, Jesus was not crucified as there was nothing he did that could justify the punishment under Roman law.  His father, under the pseudonym Barabbas, may have gone through a ceremonial or mock crucifixion. Perhaps others followed suit, such as Simon of Cyrene, to honour the event. Ambiguous Turin Shroud (under care of the Catholic Church – that should instantly raise alarm bells) is a prop designated to fool believers. Beyond doubt, the item belonged to Jacques De Molay Grand Master of the Knights Templar, though only Michael Baigent has had the courage to attest truth in his mainstream publication (Holy Blood, Holy Grail 1982) for my research. Following Molay’s heresy conviction (under Catholicism), he was crucified (1314) in a manner that traced details laid out in the New Testament texts.

Metaphorically, depending on the event’s positioning, in the biblical context, the crucifixion represents the death of Gnosticism, whereas resurrection equals triumphant rebirth in the form of Christianity. The very earliest brand is likely to be Arianism. We can see the stem of Arian-ism is Arian or Aryan, so this should volunteer major questions from the alert. Didn’t Hitler worship a mythical Aryan race? In fact, of all the ancient (pre-biblical) races “Ceres” is the type that most closely represents Ayran characteristics. Significantly, Aryans are attributed to be pure Atlantis stock (alien genes were added to replenish humanity after the fall). This fits the overall picture, because traditions (including a weight of generally unrecorded information referenced from inherent sources) suggest the Gnostics went to extraordinary lengths in their attempts to rekindle Atlantis society. Some of their more sacred traditions, which included embedded magic (notably applied by practitioners of authentic Druidism and, hence, the elites’ interest in attending the mystery schools), predate known civilisation.

It could be argued that the whole concept of monachal divinity was ushered in by Atlantis. Accoutrements include the royal sceptre, which authentic versions are magic healing wands doubling as laser weapon. Bona fide royal orbs are holographic truth generators. A king’s crown bestowed the wearer with supernatural powers. Gnostics (visually expressed in the culture of Babylonian pharaohs) tried to approximate traditions as closely as possible. Below the Atlantis umbrella, society was guided by God who assumed formal presence in human form (i.e. this notion derived into “son of God”). As far as I can ascertain, Atlantis Gods were normally male, but on (or inside) other worlds, females preside over divinity. Per alien custom, these strange Goddesses are usually escorted by what we would call “prince consorts” (heirs or court champions’ suffice). Perhaps this is why some detailed truthful accounts tabled in ancient legends come across as ludicrously farcical.  We humans know only the human way. Therefore, non-human cultures are destined to either shock the system or captivate imagination.

In the interest of clarity, Gnostic-Jewish belief supposed the messianic priest-king (Christ) was the blessed divine embodiment of the people and that is why Jesus is euphemised as the Son of God. Even so many [differing and sometimes contradictory] messages can be delivered by a single fragment of text. Researchers should assure themselves a purist’s Messiah’s wisdom would put Solomon’s childish antics in their place. Ridiculous emphasis on the Pharisees’ salute to valid laws has ruined any chance of divine virtue governing man. Old Testament sermons dictate a path to enlightenment so rigid, any traveller is guaranteed crippled from the off. That is the reason paradoxes are so plentiful, “issues” seem to loom every few verses. Per these auspices, how could religious traditions be anything other than viscerally dishonest? My heart goes out to Italy’s La Befana . That bonny witch on a broomstick does more for Italian children than any pompous pope could dream.

Reflections on What Easter Really Meant To Me

Currently employed full time, I have few hours to spare on writing projects such as this one. Fortunately corporate Australia permits an extra day’s forced holiday over Eostre, so I have been able devote time to penning something on the tafaska cause; a cause, I might add, swamped by ambiguous sentiment. Easter, as with the other Christian-Pagan festival called Christmas, is a celebration of harvest (dedicated from the Goddess Eostre). It represents the death of the season, marked by grieving tears (who said grieving could not be happy?) of the Songkran, and the other welcomes a new birth that ushers in the burning summer sun. Infancy stages are marked and drawn out, so it naturally takes a devil of a long time for the sun (sol) to emerge in full bloom. Conversely, when the cold snap sets in one day out of the blue, it will refuse to shake for several months. Occasionally a seasonal death (metaphor) will linger, but when the cold’s in, it is there to stay.

Embroiled in the Easter message (which is an encapsulation of season changes, differing depending on locations) are numerous metaphors. Perhaps most significant is the death of Tiamat one and a half billion years ago when the planet was subsequently reborn as the Earth. Made popular through living necessity, the harvest festival is far removed from heavenly politics. There is evidence of cosmic philosophy in the Pol Vuh and other ancient records, but the sheer weight of celebrations of abundance shows what the ancients took the most seriously. Indeed, for them, only clearly sincere devotion to God would permit a bountiful harvest, or, In other words, God’s blessing and presumed associated goodwill needed a “trade”. Perhaps inspired by a perceived breakdown in community devotion, at some juncture human sacrifice became the popular way of demonstrating allegiance to God, evidenced by the Wiccan and those dreadful Mayan/Aztec practices of the deep past.

True “Gnostic” Christianity also emphasises the importance of harvest, being the staple for good life. “Evil” is the measure of sickness and disease and not the “justifier” that supports vicious, unholy opinions. Legacies found in some (but by no means all) documents euphemistically labelled “Dead Sea Scrolls” expand a pantheist narrative line fused with Eastern philosophy offering a variation of existential Zen Buddhism. Though the quantum layer is not mentioned directly (and is presumably unknown) by the Gnostics, their interpretations of the dynamics of spiritual (vibrational) existence are defined as states, characters and emotions and these mimic atomic expressive fluctuations.  I discuss the importance of this style of reasoning in detail in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”.

While in shameless promotion mode, it would be remiss of me not to mention that I now offer professional consultation sessions. Current enquiries from potential clients have been split into two equal streams. Interest has been shared between the individual pursuit of divine purpose and wider communal discovery – corporeal deep genetic (potentially extra-terrestrial) heritage. I can evaluate and expand both arenas. Each session (via Skype) comes at a reasonable fee of $100 per hour, providing the currency is valid and of the US variety. Preconceptions are forbidden. Closed minds are unwelcome. Those interested in learning more should first read this article detailing an extended two hour consultation conducted recently, Captivated parties will find a contact point there for private communication.

Easter is a Christian religious festival, so to commercialise it in any way would be to insult God. Do our supermarkets give away spiced buns or chocolate eggs said to represent the mock crucifixion and rebirth of Jesus?  Other than everything seems to be “on sale” to sell these days, I saw no “giveaways” over the holiday. If Easter meant anything it seemed to represent only profit and loss. It also seemed to represent maintaining an illogical heathen fantasy that ridicules prosperity. Moreover the real Jesus would be horrified by what Christianity has become. Foul blabbermouths crusade bitterly on behalf of hollow, cynical virtues that are there only to enshrine order for order’s sake. They do not uphold the ethos of Jesus; that deliberate open hearted discovery tour and rite to passage.

No, Christianity succumbed to vile attack from the enemies beginning with the Nicolaitans partnering Constantine tyranny. But serious scholars know plans were well underway much earlier. I continue to argue Mark or Marcus, compiler of the synoptic gospel, was really a Roman aristocrat. His argument that Jesus was a part mortal Son of God satisfies all contemporary Roman ideals. If Jesus ministry, in deference to traditional dates, logically and provably (by analysis of journeying timelines) mapped the Jerusalem siege period (66-69AD), then far from there being an extended aural period (irrational in every sense), the Roman version of the life of Jesus was hot off the press right after they won the battle over Jerusalem.

The only unsatisfied enigma is as to why Disciple Peter was needed as star witness. The capture and imprisonment of what I originally believed to be one of Jesus’ chief bodyguards coincided with the collapse of Jerusalem. Given Peter’s prominence as a de facto priest in Mark’s “Acts of the Apostles”, clearly there is more to this picture than meets the eye. Thus, recently, I concluded that Peter’s association with Jesus (the figurehead) was more metaphorical than factual. Instead, he was one of the key Gnostics inside Jerusalem at the time of the siege while Jesus was journeying on the outside. Perhaps Peter’s sleeping at the time of Jesus’ capture represented the miscalculation of a Roman breach and attack of the city which ultimately ended the rebellion.

Contrary to popular opinion, the “Romans” (as were the Greeks prior) had been defeated by the Babylonian King David when the Mediterranean peoples were locally known as Philistines. The Philistines never disappeared. They relocated far from harm’s way, reconsolidated but did not undertake any large scale imperialist conquests until they had become sufficiently strong many centuries later. It is also worth mentioning that understanding of human genetics (genome) makes for greater confusion. Because the ancient Caucasian races all unrestrictedly interbred, authentic genetic traits have been indiscriminately spread over the great group today.

Originally, green eyed, red haired Celts, for instance, were a distinct variety separate of the black haired, grey eyed race and so on. It is hardly surprising the Genome project honestly judges Ashkenazi Jews as bulk-standard “whites”, much to the protest of Zionist supremacists of course. In fact green eyed, red haired priestly Celts are distinctly recorded as Viracocha’s (perhaps some sort of “Anunaki” manifestation) emissaries commissioned to transport Olmec man (presumed Negro) to Mayan South America. Each attired in loose fitting tunics tied at the waist by a coarse rope or sash, feet supported by open toed leather sandals, they appeared no different in descriptive appearance to modern day Benedictine monks.

Guatemala is most commonly referenced as the most up-to-date heritage of the Maya and tribes who have been recorded observing dozens of Earth bonding ceremonies over the Easter period. No wonder the violent imperialist Sandinistas focused on breaking the culture of that great land as a primo priority. Because of the spiritual integrity of genuine timeless ceremonies, all are destined to find a role as a holistic Easter cause. To presume spiritual disintegration of the whole and censorship of any of its parts does not violate the will of God is preposterous indeed. Divides were caused by those that assumed their own superiority and accorded that social apartheid was “justified” by these differences alone. Indeed it was overt racism that permitted the collapse of the Satan Star as the primary act of existence. I discuss the consequences in depth in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”.

The earliest known copy of any New Testament manuscript heralds from the early Christian church located in Alexandria. The document in question arguably dates prior to 200AD and is perhaps contemporary with many of the Dead Sea Scrolls. It is odd that it did survive at all, because Constantine nobbled just about all other literatures his thugs could purge from the great Alexandrian library. Our enigmatic manuscript is a copy (the original would have been sketched between 66 and 69AD) of the Fourth Gospel, which is posthumously known as “John’s”.

Aiding by compelling arguments presented by Richard Leigh (et al) in “The Holy Blood, The Holy Grail”, I conclude that John’s Gospel is a very early bastardisation of the word of the real Jesus based on parts of (not tampered with) memoirs recorded by his brother-in-law, Lazarus (son of Joseph of Arimathea). John, the “alias”, was chosen because it derives from a Hebrew expression with means “God is gracious”. It is not beyond the realms of consideration that perhaps Jesus released his own version of “John” prior to the doctored version heralding from Alexandria.

It Jesus’ version did exist, it either has not survived or is hidden from public scrutiny. Either way, should the dating of the Alexandrian bogus scroll be deemed accurate, logic dictates distortion of Essene Gnosticism was well underway from the inside even as the early church was establishing formal roots. Mark, in Acts of the Apostles, it would be fair to say, does more than hint at deep politics collectivising the early church. This doubtlessly reflected turbulent times inside Jerusalem under siege, so why wouldn’t that turmoil carry over? In normal circumstances, Paul, an unmistakable hard line Pharisee, would have failed at every attempt at infiltration.

By the Synod of Hippo (394AD) Gnosticism was dead, as an authority. Roman Catholicism had its way and the Pharisees could breathe easy.  Doctrinal “sin” made man accountable to God. Indeed emphasis on Moses’ legacy pushed the concept a stage further by implying man, as a naturally imperfect sinful being, must be subservient to God. His “commandments” or orders from God prepared for unscripted tyranny. None of these ten “primary requirements” of man were or are possible to follow to the letter. Moses had crafted laws that would imply perennial guilt on the sincerely spiritual and this is why the early Christian church, under sentence from Catholicism, became the popular resolve. Priests (who were no different to anyone else) were “apparently” bestowed with mystical powers that allowed them to veto “sin” on behalf of their helpless God.

The tradition expanded as a form of universal transcendentalism delivered through the belief in the divinity of Virgin Mary. Emphasised by the Catholic Church’s relatively recent move on the tail of the New Age “Cosmic Christbandwagon highlights just how much Mary had undermined Jesus prior. Her effigy (idol) still holds so much power some believe it is a direct channel to God.  I am speaking superficially, of course, and do not responsibly suggest this could be the case. Although it should also be noted that the spiritual value of objects must never be underestimated. When fused in combination with the power of belief, “miracles” might be possible (underscored by our lack of understanding as to the true role of atoms, the building blocks of existence).

The ancients knew that only when very similarly tuned peoples lived on a planet; it would absorb and reflect the group emotional character bandwidth as pulsating echoes. Consequentially, as one infected planet crossed another’s path or came into the zone of influence, inhabitants would be deeply affected by the others’ mood. Even today ignorant horologists make a living from this presumption. Belief in energy saturated effigies is one thing, but the Catholic mumbo-jumbo certainly obscures the truth that Mary was a Roman royal and her idolisation was a deliberate ploy to give her the eternal prestige her status vested.

The Jews were no different in this regard. Melchizedek, the “king”, was a comparative oaf who adopted traditional folklore as a cover for his own historic prosperity. The same trick is partially played scripting Jesus and, undeniably, some of the tradition highlighted by Melchizedek is drawn upon, and why not, if Jesus was of royal blood? Hebrew chroniclers were metaphor makers. Miracles, if implausible, added colour to vestige. A royal shouldn’t be comparable to a commoner. The gospel writer “Matthew” (meaning, from Hebrew, gift of God) pushes the argument that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah, which (contrary to Greek philosophic barbarism of terms) says he was the rightful shepherd king to the people of the time. Private debate continues today as to whether he, by any stretch of the truth, could be proven to be seventieth in line (taken from Ezekiel’s prophecy) after Adam.

Jesus’ own identity, I have stated several times, is a Latin joke; an anagram found in the name Josephus. Not coincidentally, if the ministry of Jesus coincided with the Siege of Jerusalem, it would have ushered in Josephus’ coming of age (euphemised by the baptism performed by John the Baptist, son of Zechariah, and one of the progressive steps to messianic authority). His father was a High Priest of the line of King David. All religious scribes were from royal families. There were no equal opportunities in these times. However, because of presumed blood heritage, theoretically any scribe could make a bee-line for regal power. The case was made by Matthew and Mark in no uncertain terms. Jesus/Josephus/Joseph ben Matthias was placed as a direct descendant of David to give added strength to stressed patronage.

Historically, corporeal (of the body) politics between Pharisees (judges) and Sadducees (scribes) was thought to act as an order balancer. This affected law making outcomes determined by the scales of power. Therefore, the most significant outcome of the Roman sacking of Jerusalem was the end of the Sanhedrin (religious government). From that point on, the Sadducees were axed leaving only totalitarian pharisaic (judgemental) domination to thrive. The corresponding exodus from Judea not only rendered Jews without a nation, but also began a new age of spiritual dogma. In effect the payoff for divine tyranny ensured complicit Jews could celebrate the fact they were no longer “goyim” (nationals) because they had no nation.

Rabid distortion of the Moses instructions (emphasised in the Book of Leviticus and others) logically ensued. Per this new irrational epoch, corrupt “Jews” no longer needed to be responsible goyim as they weren’t goyim (being nationless). Corruption was turned sour by the void in explanation as to why Moses’ generalisation tarred the goy “lower than the common beast”. Inhumane, immoral, unjustified behaviour prevailed as a result of abuse of privilege (God presumed the Jews had higher spirituality than other nationals given their grounding in faith) and this message should thrashed home by all decent, God loving Rabbis. Logic proposes Moses actually only targeted goyim that put their “nation” ahead of responsible humanity. Perhaps the answer would be found in the “lost” tabernacles protected by the Arc of the Covenant? Therefore, Israelites that suppose otherwise defy Moses and mock their true God.

With the critical loss of nationhood, the Pharisees have exploited the fact ever since. Even today Haredim deny the legality of Israel as a nation state. Why? They do so to crudely preserve pharisaic injustices whereby the Israelites can have a nation, but are not regarded as “nationals”, because ambiguity determines their nation is not certainly divinely legitimate. For those oblivious to Mosaic doctrine, it was said, of Earth’s peoples, the tribe of Levi was the most worthy under God. Under this vein of responsibility, they could guide the wider Jewish brethren, who were corporeally known as “God’s chosen people”. Finally, whatever could be done for the rest, God’s spawn, was up to the furtive moral probity of the chosen. The doctrine, in the suggestion that the Jews were God’s “chosen people”, implies Judaism is “the” unblemished authentic divine instruction. It also implies that Jews must lead by example.

Remember, none of Moses’ ten fundamental commandments’ are possible to follow to the letter; particularly given the belief that a divine authority would expect any instruction to be observed beyond fully. Therefore, if the commandments were issued “under divine authority” as described, then God was a pretty poor judge of human faculty. Indeed the philosophy behind the commandments pragmatically only encourages human beings to nit-pick ways out of responsibility, perhaps using the same five star lawyers corporates favour today, or resign to resolute spiritual incompetence. The commandments seem to have been drafted to ensure all humans are sure to fail (from the divine perspective). Given this consideration, it is hardly surprising that the Jews have assumed their arbitrary role as chosen, proto divine, people is something of an in-house joke. Faced with the impossible task of demonstrating divinity (based on the commandments), certainly Jews are no different to other humans. They innocently kill things. They have unworthy thoughts. They don’t truly believe less love something they don’t know is true. Moses “as paraphrased” gave his people a simple choice: follow the doctrine and be more worthy than anyone else or fudge it, manipulate it and abuse it.

Up to the point the Sanhedrin was disbanded, similar to politics of today, merit in decision making relied on a two party system. Over hundreds of years the some sorry debates went round and round, drawing the same old time-endured predictable conclusions. That is why Jesus was not particularly satisfied by the Sadducees as he vehemently opposed the Pharisees. Complimenting today’s political machinations, certain groups and views were marginalised to the point of deliberate ignorance or worse. Those deemed a threat to order were persecuted. Today, in conjunction, many people are “persuaded to believe” fate is merely coincidental or random by corrupt, “partisan” sciences, when the reverse is true. The Sanhedrin collapsed because its internal politics had become stale, The Roman “attack” on Jerusalem acted as a “cover story”. I used the term “attack” glibly as no evidence has been forthcoming (beyond more or less instant persecution of Gnostic Christians) to support claims. Like the sensation “holocaust” (creating more ambiguity over the spiritual “legality” of Israel), the supposedly destroyed temple may have equally been “imaginary”, in light of its defiance of strict prophesy.

Between 66-69AD Jesus was on the political campaign trail one jump ahead of authorities. Politics have become much more civil in the modern age. The roguish “pro-sovereignty” Irish party, Sinn Fein, was overtly censored for years by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on behalf of successive British governments. Though no “Jesus” by any stretch of the imagination, telecasts of leader Gerry Adams’ speeches were silenced but for newsreaders’ doctored talk-overs. His voice was said to be too intoxicating with the potential of corrupting listeners. In other words, his arguments were too valid, too compelling to be allowed to be heard and compares with predicable censorship in Jesus’ time, which is the main reason all religious texts offer so much innuendo and metaphor. No one (in sanity) could put a real name to this stuff unless he was a seriously important personage with a giant army to back his mouth up.

Though Flavius can mean golden (sometimes referring “blond haired” boys) or imperial, the Roman Flavian Dynasty is famous for its wreaths (dual metaphor – the laureate poet wearing a crown of thorns?). Encapsulated by the anagram “Josephus”, a royal poet laureate gives birth to spiritual Jesus, in turn sacrificed for sin under a crown of thorns. Mystics know this symbolism is discombobulated and stretches much further. The crown of thorns represents the barbed rose cross reinforced by the “crucifixion”. It is Jesus’ Rosicrucian/Atlantean calling card. Sadly few have the presence of mind to scrutinise this less consider implications. Rather than being one the Rosicrucians, I interpret the message stating Jesus and all Gnostics were up against the Roman version of that order which transferred to the Catholic Church, as is currently the case today. It also confirms that Zionist pharisaic nationless hard liners have partnered with Rosicrucian Philistines in order to secure the globe. Zion approximates an ancient Hebrew word that means fortress or prison.

Easter, the Christian festival, simply calculates Jesus’ death and rebirth as euphemised by the crucifixion/resurrection stories. The four gospels treat the resurrection accounts very differently. In Mark the episode is missing. Matthew passes off the occurrence almost as an aside, perhaps even “with indifference”. Luke slightly improves on Matthew’s trite delivery by adding a short précis of the outline found in Mark’s Acts of the Apostles. In the Acts of the Apostles account Jesus is presented as so disfigured by his harrowing ordeal, he is barely recognisable. Only by “his words” (metaphor – the “legacy of Jesus” and beware of false prophets too) can some of the apostles “see” (another couched metaphor – damned by censorship). For Mark (the Roman who possibly was the character that is labelled Judas Iscariot) Jesus was spent, done, finished and only belong with the other dead (and out of fashion) prophets, so he sent him off in a cloud (we have the expression today “head in the clouds” meaning “to be unrealistic”. It appears to also be a contemporary Roman idiom, so might it apply here?).

It is the legacy of Jesus that was the great threat to pharisaic order and this needed to be censored as all cost. Over the Easter period, I had an enlightening discussion with an Islamic scholar. Unbeknownst to me, the one thing that separates Jesus from all other mystics is he refrained from use of the instructions “no” or “don’t”. Mohamed, we both concluded, took the pharisaic “forced order” path, which, upon reflection, is not entirely “without merit”. His doctrine assuring “alms for the poor” significantly improves on Jesus’ own suggestive Feeding of the Five Thousand and Good Samaritan parables. Was support of others to be made obligatory, then social communion would be a small step away. It is no wonder that the very first Islamic war was fought over the interpretation of Mohamed’s alms for the poor doctrine.

That is why Easter has succumbed to crass commercial “Passover” and the desperate, disadvantaged and poor have been left, all but forsaken.