Gagged and Media Blinded, Dazed Goyim Herded Towards “Vaccine Armageddon”?

Over the season, I have put together more than a few articles reflecting on an obviously bogus pandemic orchestrated by that assiduous global political cabal who collectivize round an associated pharmacologically lobbied computer generated Coronavirus saga that sounds like something dredged up from Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Of balanced mind, I have decided now is the time to put all the pieces of the grand heist together, and please don’t be deceived by all that puerile “made for TV” banter; for a Machiavellian heist is what it is. Securely perched at my writing desk located downtown of Western Sydney, Australia, I have been ensconced in what provincial bureaucrats like to term lock down. On the same subject, recently chatting with a few locals of ubiquitous character, we did manage to exchange excused opinions over credibility (or lack of) casting political scapegoats that “justify” all the fuss. Investigative processes naturally prompted some delving into histories of attached political maneuvers.  The more we delved, the more we came to realize there has never been a “lock down” here or anywhere else for that matter. The only exception to this glum philosophy has been when wartime curfew reigned. Worse still, at times of war innocent peoples for some ungodly reason have been herded into concentration camps, many killed for their own good (including infamous Anne Frank who succumbed to Tuberculosis in Belgium in 1943, were myths to be regarded representative).

Conclusions were understandably desperate. Albeit reluctantly, we mutually agreed what we have now is the supplant of “open” concentration camps (in instances of premeditated lock down) without any verifiable war, but is that truly the case? All facts concurring with current events considered, might “the people” be subject to the greatest silent intifada our globe has ever experienced; a covert World War Three? If so, in hesitation, we unanimously settled this was the only one plausible conclusion to draw from the exaggerated chaos surrounding us here. Suffice to say, along these lines, contention must have been the spark that calculated a paradoxical, but decisive clash sponsored by “governments” against those they rule over. But more on that seditious plot later. Now deserves valued effort attended to inspecting the detail; for, they do say, you find the devil in the detail for good reason. A pivotal examination from all my other relevant articles, Rudolf Virchow’s “germ theory” demands further scrutiny here because it is one of the key highlights exposing Coronavirus science malpractice. Please do not make the tragic mistake of falling for the academic fallacy that covets blind faith. Philosophically unblemished science is a proven anathema. “Science” knowingly lied about origins of HIV. William H. Thompson, chief scientist for Merck Vaccines, is on record admitting to deliberately falsifying results of data pertaining to side effects of Thimerosal (a morbid cocktail of heavy metals) tainted product (MMR) on African Americans. Scientists are human. They are capable of lying and cheating, denying and deceiving just the same as everyone else.

Even directly after Virchow emphatically discredited his own theory, foul corporate sciences then remained unmoved and, thus, much later, predictably unkempt stoic standards have proliferated and festered. These resound majestically befuddled as ever today. Virchow, of course, remarked that germs (though he didn’t use that precise word, which is an anagram of R gems. “R” is a computer coding language, but I wonder whether connotation implying coding stretches back to the Victorian era or prior. R is added to Modena to compose Moderna [vaccine]) “needed something to feed on” in contemptuous reevaluation of his own thesis. Yet, today, the far more straightforward question that desperately needs to be asked is “what “on Earth” are germs”? Regularly I hear the expression “germs crawling everywhere” issued with sleight of hand, but what are these germs that crawl everywhere? Can we suppose, for instance, germs (gems for industrial medicine) substitute for bacteria? If so, the notion of them crawling everywhere would be at the very least ideologically palatable. But how can identical viewpoint be applied to conceptual viruses? Viruses, according to malleable science (matching enterprises that define bacteria), don’t live, so they cannot possibly crawl nor correspondingly be germs. Therefore, why might corporate marketers apply reasoning that implies viruses are abnormal varieties of “contagious” living germs? Those drawn to “photographic evidence” witness only discarded biological materials, timely props that, as with that notoriously shallow emperor’s nonexistent clothes, coat any virus sufficiently to allow culprit to hide permanently invisible.

Consequentially people have been forced to wear “protective” masks that are full of holes. To rub salt into the wounds, most insider healthcare agencies at some point in debate cycles have argued what should be called “muzzles” by honest protagonists are ineffective (the polite word for useless). Effective protection would require a full body suit perhaps something akin to the attire of deep sea divers’ but designed to provide an all over unblemished oxygen supply. Masks are brilliant at exposing those who comply under order of authority though, or, rather, over extended periods of austerity, those who need to be corrected for refusing to comply. Authorities that might wish to overstate compliance would have every interest in assuring universal facemask “tag” uptake. The more masks displayed in the open would represent greater power of authority. I am surprised they have stopped at public places. Is one’s home classed as sacred territory anymore? Can a priest’s holy water sufficiently maintain a lingering divine force field? Those that apply resolve to this matter will be indubitably clear in their foresight. Viruses are delivered by terrains which means some (possibly the majority) must be airborne. It is also indubitably clear that rhetoric casting the current clandestine quarantine measures discombobulate viruses as bacteria. Per this miraculous metamorphosis, though trackable, otherwise undetectable menaces are transmitted via expelled vapid extraneous body fluids which eerily “float” between humans closer one and a half metres’ apart, particularly when implicating people coming out of China (like the whispers and “Africa” presumably).

Scientific consensus uniformly agrees a virus is an inactive yet constantly mutating microscopic bundle of RNA (genetic proteins that form into cells), but fall short of explaining where the RNA comes from. Notional belief that a virus (or symptomatic “pox”) is alien to the body expounds from germ theory (tweaked by Pasteur); which, upon technical review, contends a classical, whilst mind boggling, academic vicious circle (which came first; the virus or the germ?). Prestigious Antoine Bechamp, Royal Raymond Rife and doubtlessly many others suppose or have supposed the reverse is true, of course. In my article Coming Clean on Cancer, I advise that the body “coats” all invading particles with its own genetic materials to satisfy a universal assimilation model (that once was termed the Luciferian catalyst). Here provides for a body’s three fundamental waste disposal options. Invaders can be absorbed into functioning parts of the main, contained in dormant fluids or processed via the liver or kidneys for ejection. Our sciences largely ignore the first two options, exclusively projecting potential for hostile internal conflict. Insomuch, supposedly serious thought and its programmed doctors correspondingly claim they join forces with a body’s surrogate elite commandos with view to vanquishing viral foe. I couldn’t fantasize better melodrama, but said considerations fly in the face of truth. The truth couldn’t be more straightforward here. Reasoning defining so-called Coronavirus and its contagion mandate is notionally flawed.

I say so-called Coronavirus because the idea behind the “plague” is not new. A prior article notes the scientific name (having origins coinciding with 1918 end of World War One and a violent sun, perhaps camouflaging Spanish Flu) was used in a 1990’s Simpsons Show episode. Isn’t it fascinating that the updated (if that is so) version of this propagandised “pandemic” turns up a hundred years later in 2019 (well, actually, “leaks” claim a “deal” was struck between Gates, Fauci and others at an unspecified [Modena located?] European conference in 2018). Could the end of the first overt “population busting” world war and subsequent politics have been devoted to reassignment of healthcare as a weapon (it is long known that the American hospital system is more effective at killing people than armed conflict) in order to advance a final covert world war to finish the job? Could responding initiatives have been planned long in advance? Of course “the powers” cover their tracks well, but rudimentary evidence suggests blueprints may have been laid prior to the 1890’s Boer War. Middle World War (Two), was used to set up the modern day economic environment following Butler’s unthinkable (at the time) 1948 social security reforms, which converted civilized masses into processed welfare state dependents to compliment universal immigration policies. Troublesome other world nations were turned “communist” after systems had been successfully tested in Russia (fiercely independent Polish Cossacks have always been a thorn in the establishment’s side). In line, welfare fever has been rebranded as socialism and none more prevalent than under Obama’s “post Iraq” vision for the United States of America (honouring Benjamin Netanyahu’s rabid pledge). The mighty swindler most definitely lived up to his name as crook-in-chief.

That said, choice of Coronavirus in its current role as prosthetic threat is probably the best piece of tangible evidence supporting the view that all world wars have been staged long in advance of issued blueprints. Reasoned deduction strongly points to a connection so, though much hinges on the fact, I am convinced 1918 Coronavirus became popularly known as Spanish Flu to fuel popular hatred against a civilized “enemy”. Between 1918 and 1925 a vicious and ill-conceived marketing campaign incredulously blamed peoples of Latin origins for spread of plague, whilst academic papers (albeit released from the 1940’s onwards) postulated construction of the [then] new energy grid was specific cause of sickness. Having said that, I need to be careful with my choice of words here as there is also a huge gap in accountability when reviewing associated death statistics, but I’ll return to data samples presently. We can see near matching “strategies” applied to today’s marketing of the virus, which casts Chinese pretty much exclusively responsible for current occurrence. (Presuming deliberate foul play here), that would be why numerous previous bird flu (not to mention SARS) “warm up” epidemic waves have routinely emanated from “Asia” over the past decade. As I noted in my first article, back in the day (late 1800’s), because of conflict with “super power” America, Spaniards were rendered extremely unpopular until after they were given a dose of Franco to put them in their place. Spain had Franco (no wonder the Catalans rebelled) and Russia had Stalin to serve up nice big cups of shut the hell up. Fascism and “corporate” Communism are close extremist cousins that apply common standards of tyranny over the masses.

Singling out distinct nationals (goyim) to tar and feather was deemed just as important for HIV propagandists. HIV, like our bogus origins of mankind, accordingly “came out of Africa”, which all the more remarkably duplicated consistent parameters for Coronavirus, partly because the same senior stakeholders have been behind both operations. Unethically manipulative (doctoring) doctors (under lynch threat of London protestants) have shown themselves up as now universally content to rebrand any normal illness to verify and beef up “Coronavirus positives” after third world medical infrastructures proved infinitely corruptible faced with lucrative IMF bribes, sorry I mean grants, to tackle spread of HIV. Thinking of history (do old dogs ever learn new tricks?), damning evidence of unaccountability, all the while, can be found in apt appraisal of relevant statistics. Zimbabwe’s AIDS death toll was exaggerated up to hundreds of times real figures. It is estimated anywhere between fifteen and fifty million people succumbed to Spanish Flu. That’s a gap of thirty-five million, for Christ’s sake. Are we expected to believe in the credibility of those wayward numbers? It seems to me there has been general healthcare fogginess as to true death causes post World War One, possibly fault of idiopathic principles. When considering the current “as broadcast” pandemic soberly, global death rates are normal. That is, subsequent to issuance of en-masse vaccinations.

Let’s take a pause here. I have written about the deceitful nature of past spurious campaigns before. None is more worthy of highlight than failed chemo drug AZT, which was deliberately reissued to kill off HIV infected (the plausible excuse) gays. I can additionally cite “sacrifice” of expendable lab rat troops designated for Iraq, but there are plenty of other bogeys prevalent for those committed to doing the research on palatable evil. Consequentially, we must conclude conscience will play no part in any desperate quest to rid the world of “useless eaters” (which was one of prior US secretary of state Henry Kissinger’s scathing remarks regularly referenced by alternative movement crusaders). Aligned United Nations edict demanding shrinkage of populations at any price (remarking that war and birth control measures have demonstrably failed) is rather more worrying. Is it a coincidence that the United Nations champions universal wellness standards (reinforced by the World Health Organisation) which anchor today’s universal healthcare? You see where this is heading. What benefit are thriving, “well” populations to authorities obsessively committed to radical civilization reduction? At best, the United Nations has demonstrated duplicitousness through its contradictory mandates. Come on now, just as with Shakespeare’s witches of Macbeth, they spin a roaring cauldron so full of lies it bubbles over into the streets.

I touched on strategic implication of the Boer war a while back. Though conflict actually began in December 1880 framing a territorial dispute between local farmers, petering out after a few months, “round two” corporate warfare was the period of distinct interest. This ran from 11 (note those angel numbers again – “1” signifies inspiration) October (10) 1899 to the last day of May 1901. Pagan fertility rites connected to May day (May 1) perhaps have no influence here, but May (from the spiritual perspective) is perceived as coordinator of nature’s potency. Whilst disputes (between farming nationals) could have easily been resolved via diplomatic means, consequences blew up into what became an “international” war. Though I find no historic account of involvement of foreign mercenaries, Britain did have the advantage of drawing resources from her burgeoning empire. Trade across Africa was deeply impacted. Debatable warm-up act for the Boer war, conflict over Russia’s Crimea certainly drafted mercenary troops. Crimea was also the first war that was fought with modern weaponry, to tragic results. Nearly a million men lost their lives. Paled into insignificance, death toll of the second Boer war better highlights the failure of the concentration camp (lock down), which claimed more fatalities than those felled in battle.

I concluded the Boer war was the precursor to or “preparation” for the First World War. However, there were other islands of malcontent along the historic path. Notably the War of “independence” over Cuba between the Spanish and Americans in 1898, not to mention the Chinese Boxer Rebellion 1899-1901 (keeping pace with the Boers). Particularly important here is the truth that Chinese insurrection was clearly a backlash from the few months earlier British annex of Hong Kong, under a hundred years’ contractual lease from ruling dynasties. The “more civilized” British had attempted a similar strategy in 1862. Arguments supporting permanent leadership (occupation) of the immensely powerfully port city/state Shanghai were rejected out of hand in 1863. Today we have a massive trade war with China which began directly after ownership of Hong Kong (prior cheaply priced goods “made in Hong Kong” had a reputation for poor quality) reverted back to the Chinese Communist Party in 1997. It seems odd, with all that venom directed at Mao Tse Tung, I can’t understand why he didn’t seize power of Hong Kong (model of British imperialism) any time after 1948. Perhaps this compliments the mystery behind American President Truman’s lack of action following the news of China’s demise [below the red peril], remembering that global “locked border” immigration began in earnest from 1947 and, of course, international law maker Israel “conveniently” reformed in 1948 while Butler was drafting his roll out strategy for the great social security swindle. Given the background I have already accumulated; Globalist fortuitous planning seems anything but coincidental.

The French, who have currently legitimized total removal of personal liberty via President Macron’s (yes, and I had faith that Scott Morrison wouldn’t “entirely” abandon Australia all along, by the way) betraying “vaccines passport” (Obama seemed to predict this in his healthcare program – repealed by Trump lest we forget), have been fighting with Britain ever since Agincourt and remarkably divide the world between “reversed” legal systems. Their “guilty until proven innocent” is the sheer opposite of Britain’s “innocent until proven guilty” justice model. On that front, Biden has followed the crooked path in his obsessing over “ordered” America, recently pushing through legislation that casts all citizens as “ill until proven healthy” (in effect a precursor to any “vaccines passport”), although there have been tepid grumblings from the red states over mandatory vaccination. Bureaucratic medical accountability has proven far from honourable over the years. Aside from mentioning it earlier, I regularly cite abuse of [first] Gulf War conscripts conned into taking medications against non-existent complaints. Black market statistics project up to fifty thousand ex-service men fatally succumbing to their medications, highlighted by the unpublicized bona fide reason motivating Timothy McVeigh’s botched 1995 attack (arguably saving Clinton’s presidency) on Oklahoma City’s Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. More damning was the deliberate assault on gays facing HIV (“that dud”) infection. I cannot stress enough, the drug used to “fight” AIDS caused the complaint and those involved knew it prior to drafting the appalling medication. Jon Rappoport writes at length about the onerous history of AZT (a rebranded failed and docked 1950’s chemo cure) in “AIDS Inc.” (1988).

The implications of this knowledge are staggering. History shows us that AIDS was mass marketed as a viral development of HIV. Not to mention “ethics”, medical “powers” overstepped their authority by denying the truth here. All those AIDS death figures should have been remembered as casualty of deliberate medical error (even if they thought the impossible was possible, i.e. a failed drug could “work” a second time round). Was this a lone incident (i.e. state sanctioned murder of particular political strata) philosophical outlook pertaining to duty of care under government would be “bleak” indeed. But this wasn’t a lone incident. Forced sterilisations in Guatemala and Costa Rica “post communism”, the Gulf War abuse referenced earlier are two worthy of mention, but there have been many, many others including George Soros’ medical attack of South Africans under auspices of a phony Ebola “outbreak” in the lead up to Coronavirus (suggesting that, rather than the exception, medical genocide is destined to become “the rule”). Per HIV and Ebola branded statistics, those that died “officially” succumbed to plague. Now we know that medications were the true cause of mortality after the fact, but what if similar covert genocide strategies were increased to Diocletian proportions?

Could the billions designated to fall under spell of immunization be marked down as future Covid fatalities? How might morbid “waves” (egged on by salaciously irresponsible Medias) impact any ignorant person’s decision making in favour of authority “wisdom” (i.e. will the complacent be even more compelled to choose “vicious circle” inoculation against inevitable, whilst perennially “theoretical” plague)? We know that medical salesmen will vent steroids in their triumphant yet remorseless assault of posthumous victims. Do they offer “cures” for sitting ducks? They used to call these back street peddlers snake oil quacks in Victorian times and we know too well when one duck squawks, the gaggle are bound to follow suit – regardless. No one, not a single person specifically died of HIV yet historic records arrogantly defy this truth. With specific reference to Coronavirus, looming light is looking equally stark. Whilst some may have been sufficiently affected by electromagnetic poisoning (from instruments such as the 5G network) not to survive “effects” (generated by the reacting body), fatality numbers are insignificant when compared against the mass global death rate. Whilst standard analysis mimics vitamin B deficiency, it is no surprise to me that bumptious science extends one-stop-shop Coronavirus “symptoms” so as to satisfy diagnosis of just about all other illnesses from mumps to syphilis. Prior to 2019 what would normally be called something else is now Coronavirus so, as with HIV, positives concordantly substitute in place of rational diagnosis. Yes, there is an avalanche of dissenters buffering against the system, but even so, across the board doctoring doctors are shown up as infinitely corruptible here.

If the establishment does have a heart, it’s most definitely black. We must never lose sight of the fact that politicians care less about truth for they are in the business of brokering innuendo along party and other conspiratorial, yes conspiratorial lines. As great Benjamin Disraeli whimsically observed, they adopt and adapt applied statistics like treacle. Thus the lies, damned lies and accountable unaccountability are as fresh as ever today. Might politicians bother to fret over corrupt medical institutions? Of course not; not even for one second. Doctors and their institutions are beyond reproach unless they buck the system. And, on that front, if one more gormless dullard politely beckons me to “stay safe”, I swear I shall rip his bloody face off. These mantras of denseness are religiously led by emptyheaded “sissy” police with nothing better to do than stakeout supermarkets. If holey masks (yeah, literal sieves) don’t satisfy EU guidelines, there’s a $500 on the spot fine for “idiots” (from the Greek “idios” – deniers of authority sway). Heated debate over the effectiveness of the medical initiative or right to choose has no influence. Lofty decisions have been made. Though masks don’t function (in any sense of the word); post litigation, logic or reason pertaining to functionality is rendered perfunctory. Litigators and their agents merely “uphold the law” regardless of consequences from the point a new law (no matter how ill-conceived, crass or zany) comes into being.

Given this unconscionable political flippancy, if medical genocide was championed for whatever reason, the remorseless, robotic conveyor belt that oils the system wouldn’t give a fig for the consequences.  In make-believe “TV land” remedy to any crisis is routinely given the highest priority. Leaders in TV world are almost always righteous but, on the rare occasions a bad apple finds its way into the barrel, Eddy Murphy or some other ass-busting “cop” always comes to the rescue just at the nick of time. Take heed. In the real world, your world, there are mostly lackeys, sycophants and evil masterminds. Don’t expect any shining defenders to jump to the rescue and vigilantly save the honour of humanity, because just about everyone is corrupt, either in heart or in deed. You can bank on innumerable political pundits sanctioned to do everything in their power to confuse the heck out of chaos. Sadly, Rock Hudson, Freddy Mercury, Jorge Bolet, Liberace, Kenny Everett and all those other glamorous celebrities died in vain. They were duped into, done over and murdered by a deliberating medical establishment who knew precisely what the outcome of rebranding and proscribing poison pill AZT would be.

By the time of the first gulf war, HIV/AIDS paranoia was beginning to wither. Many western doctors were proving obstacles to the pharmaceutical cartel. Whilst unrelated, this short diversion should emphasise relevant mindset attached to the smokescreen. History correctly informs us that the reason for the first gulf war was a reaction to Saddam Huissein’s “unprovoked” (which is a great lie, of course) attack on Kuwait. In fact, far from the mayhem projected by Washington’s propaganda machine, Saddam’s men were only there for two days. And all they ransacked were Kuwait’s oil fields, by setting the pyre turrets on fire (taking two years to extinguish, by local accounts). So how was Saddam provoked into this ungracious act? Well, it appears the Bush family (via a deal with Bin Laden’s Carlyle Group) muscled into the Kuwaiti oil business with a makeshift ferry service (used to transport barrels offshore to dock). Yet, this wasn’t enough for ambitious dynasts. Family enterprise Zapata was destined for the top and, before long, Milken Bush (executive chairman) made the decision to fund their own exploratory drilling. Remember those spiteful allegations against Saddam? Well, the company actually embroiled in slant drilling reality was Zapata who, effectively, were thieving Saddam’s oil from their watery Kuwaiti safe haven, so the attack was pay back. All the talk of reviewing ancient charts and a Falkland/Malvinas Islands “Mach 2” was utter Gump.

They call the first Gulf War a “war”, but it only lasted a month and not a single American lost his life, beyond consequence of a few dozen’ expensive “friendly fire” incidents. If the propaganda (which, along with those phony weapons of mass destruction, included non-existent oil pollution sabotage) is to be believed (and I personally don’t believe it), America’s angry posse slaughtered hundreds of thousands of ill-prepared and ill-armed Iraqis (who were long battle hardened following a vicious crusade against Iran). It seems to me that the first gulf war was merely designed to give the “impression” that Americans in battle were super strong as part of a wider fear tactics campaign used to propel the real war (which ran from 2003-11 under the auspicious claim of eliminating terrorism). Incidentally, after recently withdrawing from Afghanistan (a twenty years’ war/occupation) leaving its peoples to fend for themselves against a now “AOK” Taliban, Biden has emphatically stressed there is to be no ceasefire on terror (predictable symptom of the messianic age). Few seem to remember, per course of procuring their New World Order [oil] pipeline securing “trophy” in 2001 in revenge for Bin Laden’s supposed September 11 masterminded atrocity (not acknowledged by the FBI), America vetted and then permitted a Bin Laden relative to rule Afghanistan, whose own dear brother ran that lucrative illicit heroin business out to Europe socialites daren’t mention in polite conversation. So, from this, the sane can discern the whole episode must be considered dirty pull.

Returning to my medical theme, the main purpose of the first gulf “war” was to test pharmaceutical drugs on lab rats. These drugs were not designated to save them. Far from it, as there was no threat. There were no biological or chemical weapons. The drugs were tested to see which ones were the best at killing unsuspecting volunteers. They were drafted in preparation for World War Three. The gays were pretty quick to react away from their medications after considering possibly “why” colleagues were dropping like flies from their adopted AZT cure. Was World War Three, “elitist global government against expendable useless citizenry”, to be an overwhelming success, it would need to introduce numerous killer agents, whilst unknown, each more toxic than the next. Though I presented credible mathematics supporting the case against a universal kill off in my first article on Coronavirus, I only factored in data profiling for what is known today. Per this view, we simply don’t have manpower/technologies to head off pandemic disease (the effects of untouched rotting corpses) resulting from a supernatural genocide conducted over a short period of time (to offset restoring impact of booming incoming births). Yet, if alien technologies were deployed, drafting current “in service” troops from all four corners of the globe, both trained in the art of corpse disposal but themselves not damaged by tainted vaccines, perhaps any cleanup response is planned to be the first exercise of its kind.

These are not normal circumstances. There never has been a universal quarantine drill like this one in living memory. New normal has proven consistently abnormal in as much as the facts laugh in the face of proscribed agendas. Perhaps this is why the CIA’s Google search engine has taken such unprecedented steps to ensure information censorship of higher profile venting debunkers. The powers have undeniably demonstrated mischievous genius here. Let me explain how. Over the years, Jon Rappoport and many other fringe critics have remonstrated over wave after wave of false alarm medical epidemics, perhaps commencing with HIV/AIDS. We had various bird flu strains, pig flu, Ebola and, if that wasn’t enough, Chinese SARS would literally rot your DNA, we were told. Not a year went by without some “unexpected” incident briefly interrupting the headlines. To give this example, over the past few weeks I have undertaken a marketing campaign for a company with a unique product that leverages off cloud technology. There is nothing quite like it in the software arena. The problem is, because of its uniqueness, no one’s “expecting” it and this means no one “wants” it. People like what they know. That’s why belief systems have been so effective at destroying human libido. Thus, for people to “buy” Coronavirus, it justified a big “Mein Kampf” style warm up act and that act, in my opinion, began with HIV. Perhaps this is the reason premier stakeholders behind the medical intifada against Coronavirus show up as the precise same guys (according to Dr. Judy Mikovits) that drove HIV/AIDS remedy twenty-five years ago.

We know that CDC front runner Dr. Anthony Fauci (an ex. Bernie Madoff associate) spruiked the idea of a prophet busting, God almighty looming plague of cosmic proportions on his 2017 US university tour. 2017 is the centenary year of the 1917 Zionist engineered communism/socialism coup that destroyed imperial Russia, lest we forget. Alert readers will recall I mentioned World War One earlier within my wider historic profiling of a circa 1880’s objectively founded long term strategy to end humanity as it is known (though the idea of depopulation may have been drawn from much more distant sources). Forcing resignation from the great war, text books inform us Russian military generals issued their giant “steamroller” army guns without ammunition and refused to draft a benched “shining” artillery. Absurdity claims the same basic thing happened in Iraq. Over the duration of a month, primitive sand monkeys armed with pea shooters faced Goliath Americans brandishing freshly painted, super tech RPG’s. The difference here is the Russian generals could have employed their best weaponry but didn’t. From the retrospective, their troops faced certain slaughter; and that’s what happened, of course. Was it military incompetence of the highest order or were the generals actually agents of a grander global conspiracy? If so, that conspiracy removed any chance of a contrived military reaction against the Bolshevik takeover (with the primary target to bottleneck the food supply chain to bluntly show ungrateful plebeians who’s boss). Russia’s loss of her steamroller ensured vulnerable impotence which, ultimately, led to the wholesale murder of any royal would be “inheritor”. With no contending royals there could be no possibility of a future popular uprising, not that regal heritage has garnered much sway in “EU managed” liberated East Block territories. Gosh that all happened a long time ago, let’s forget the past, eh?

Maybe I digress here, but are there any royals left to restore constitutional monarchy, anyway? Royal Assent is an essential precedent which attempts to assure that external governing parliaments ultimately represent the monarchal authority. Per such auspices, each new piece of legislature is subject to royal oversight (for Britain, some would argue this role was partially out-sourced in line with the creation of the House of Lords). However, when Queen Anne of England withheld her commission “upon advice from ministers” to review and ratify the Scottish Militia Bill on 11 March 1708, private government was cast free. From then on, in principle, though “the people” voted them in, permitted authorities could do as they desired without hindrance. They remain a power unto themselves until today, because no other monarch has exercised Royal Assent protocol since Queen Anne. There is another strange coincidence associated with 1708 though. On January 1 of that year Sweden’s Charles XII dispatched a hapless battalion to sack Russia’s Romanov dynasty (descendants were executed by the Bolsheviks in 1917). Home forces proved too strong for the assault and fighting ended in less than two years, but what is particularly intriguing is that, according to colloquial accounts, fifty million gold dollars were raised (in addition to twenty million under US cover that was briefly intercepted by Canadian authorities) by Swedish financiers to substantially bankroll “Russia’s workers’” revolution. The Swedes are regarded as descendants of the notorious Vikings who, certain historians argue, were what became of the mythical “Varangian Guard”. Swedish money also had a theoretical role to play in the fall of monarchy following English Charles I’s notorious beheading in 1649.

Russian writers of the ilk of Nikolai Levashov have liked to argue that political manipulation of the masses under guise of civilization commenced with the fall of Atlantis. Nevertheless, for a specifically scoped population clearing agenda, we are safe to hark back to around 1889. That is when dreams of Messianic order, a guaranteed peace on Earth, were to be drafted into effect. It was decided safety related only to scales of law enforcement management. Thus, shepherds, or chosen ones, would need to exponentially increase in numbers relative to the remainder. This could only be achieved by significantly culling attended flocks. Said quotas would have to shrink tenfold or more. Chosen ones would remain as they were, untouched. Maybe the precise balance of numbers has relied on trust (echoed Billy Meyer’s Swiss based cult) in channeled extra-terrestrial Pleidian (who ruled Atlantis) wisdom, but the drivers behind the depopulation initiative would have definitely needed a clear picture of modelled results to be sure of success. Here they needed and used science, which has proven a double edged sword as far as trust management is concerned. Initially given a free reign, experience deemed liberal thought deserved to be “contained”, if the agenda wasn’t going to be inhibited or broken. So, from a certain point, scientists themselves were rendered personally voiceless. They were conditioned into becoming guided followers of subliminal masonic commands via devices such as Google click analytics.

That opened the door to a further problem, for when it comes to science and other “technical” affairs, people prefer to trust-to-luck. Ableist maybe, but some things are simply beyond understanding, it seems. With science we are destined to enter hallowed territory, bible land, whereby none dare “question” for fear of being branded heretic. Scientists themselves rely on intensive training spinning near unattainable complexities of conceptualizations to stay in the safe zone. Only those in the club might see through the veneer, but they have been too long programmed down the path, a path where “when white is always black, it stays black”, even when the light’s on. Of course, A-graders invariably go in the other direction. They champion their grounded beliefs. To protect themselves, these trailblazers instinctively maintain that any pauper’s personal devotion to online degraded research of high-falutin’ copyright is tantamount to blasphemy. All the while, their unmoved glib response to the situation at hand is we must “trust in the experts”. As with those hallowed biblical prophets, vouched experts are beyond reproach (but only when officially verified). Traditions may well suit candid political banter of the modern age, but will never appease the prodigally ardent intellectual, particularly while framing decisions are “cast” by “unerring” computer modelling. Yet today, all things considered, when it comes to real harm done, the most dangerous of all are those enterprising medical insiders with aggressive followings who refuse to dispute the phony problem is Coronavirus, COVID-19 or whatever else you like to call it. They do attack authority over its damaged cures. These devil’s doctors would be regarded scoundrels in a sane world, because any clairvoyant can see they merely cash in on their own “snake oil” pomp which parasites off a miraculous market of manipulation.

Lest we dare forget, systemic choruses “from the wilderness” led by precisely coordinated corporate Medias made “us” scared of “the problem” in the first place. Acclaimed politically “responsible” bloviating governments robbed us of our money and liberty in order to protect us from this vapid abyss. How predictably their self-serving roadmap turned out only to be a horribly irresponsible smokescreenreaction” that cordially made things far worse. Therefore, the one plausible failsafe for the bloviates and their aligned Media hacks was to blame those that demonstrably exposed flawed thinking and supporting arguments that precipitated fear from the onset, as key obstacles to their precariously untenable best of breedssolution”. So, understandably, when any anonymous registered nurse with a big following “speaks out”, she clearly acts as mouthpiece for yet more masquerading witches of Macbeth, who have pre-prepared bubble and boiling hybrid versions of techno-babble to offer in justification for their own benediction of mankind. They are no different to the other pariahs. Praise Lord. As with the others, trials perennially deliver “very encouraging” results. After three American guinea pigs were given Bell’s palsy and secret Australian tests reputedly hosted HIV as one of the consequences, does Pfiser repent? Not on your nelly. Ignoring immune system damage, after more than a million documented cases of side effects and many, many deaths from their vaccines, has Astra Zeneca withdrawn its virulent serum? Not in a heartbeat, because the redeeming contract was already signed in blood long before Coronavirus became commonly known. Forgive Elizabeth Warren and other “black widows”, for do you know how many $ billions are at stake here? Or should I say trillions of dollars?

We all know money makes the world go round. Therefore, everyone, regardless of status, hives off the banking system. This means all, great or small, are caught in the web, of course. Back to brass tacks, the main purpose for this article was to predict a projected desperate course of destiny which might reveal a radical downsizing of humanity prophesizing end times of what we identify with today as modern man. My prior essays on the subject ruled out the idea of a giant kill off, because the staggering resources requirement to complete objectives to an anywhere near timely enough schedule was an impossibility. I did the math’s. I proved it could not be. But I also failed to take the unknown, potential for deployment of alien technologies into account. Netanyahu and other foul mouthed Zionists (in favour of a prison planet exclusively ruled by Israel) have been bragging about Armageddon for decades. Even though it was a mostly gentiles’ casualty, the Jews whine endlessly about a World War Two holocaust which supplanted the need to cleanse (Tuberculosis) infected corpses. So, could there be some means to process acres of bodies via an unheard of cremation method? Whilst unlikely, it is not beyond the realms of possibility. People are pretty stupid, very easy to predict and, in so many ways, do live up to expectations as surrogate “sheep”. But they are not that stupid. If nine out of ten were “marked” for “death by vaccine”, at some critical point the mass would realize they’ve been “set up”. To avoid all out panic, wouldn’t devious authorities commission periodic waves, making sure that deaths sufficiently outstrip new births to make significant dents in the overall population bulk?

There are other more far-fetched considerations, such as a possible role for chemtrails. Any good chemist knows that normally dormant ingredients when put together can generate explosive effects. Is there something in these particular vaccines that will work to extraordinarily negative value when triggered by tainted atmosphere? Only time will tell in this instance, but I think it is fairly safe to preclude that the first two rounds of inoculation are part of the “warm up”, the “drill” and have been mandated to test how to best manage the sheep (or, rather, what percentage refuse to comply). Karma has arguably bitten the illustrious planners in the ass, because with the large numbers of detrimental side effects (Astra Zeneca’s first jab, Pfiser’s jab number two), the sheep are already cautious and, other than those “die hard” Covidiots, wary of the agenda. This is not to say that my original conclusions determining a plan for a staged sterilization campaign is necessarily invalid. Indeed, the worst affected recipients, according to vaccine side effect statistics, are youth to young adult males. Were they the precise target, then my theory that “medicine” was designed to destroy critical (ovary) RNA needed to build fetuses is clearly off-target. To add weight to that consideration, I learn that Bill Gates (hereditary passionate eugenics advocate) said healthcare and vaccines could reduce unsustainable population growth (2010 TED talk). Was he implying sterilization serum formula was already known?

However the bureaucrats slice and dice figures has no effect. There is no pandemic. Following that tsunami of panic prompted by news of an original Italian outbreak March 2020, the world shifted into compliance mode. Because Media focus was on vulnerability of “the elderly”, best health practice shifted into overdrive. Here, the farcical impact revealed lowest seasonal death rates in years. For a recent census of the US (October 2021) mortality averages, statistics match 2004 compliments just as we are being told the “pandemic” is at high tide. Ill-effects of the vaccine are well known. There have been leaks of executive “worries” based on very large numbers of documented injuries. One sensational Pfiser “whistleblower” has emphasized the ethical dilemma from using “Soylent Green genre” aborted (murdered) fetal stem cells in serums. Sweden has banned Moderna vaccines for causing heart (inflammation) problems in patients (although Canada has flatly “ignored” concerns). Beyond the made-for-TV banter and political pantomime, things are not going well, perhaps best highlighted by overt rebellion in New York’s schools. Have any of the 107 million Americans not returned work been vaccinated? Unsurprisingly, the whole contagion manipulation and its turbulent Noddyland computer models are beginning to wear thin after the best part of two years. People, even ones on side with “the system”, have had enough. Australia’s stampede towards vaccination clinics has been motivated almost entirely by scare mongering following state governments’ “domino” initiatives threatening outlaw from pubs, clubs and other social meeting venues after many workplaces “insisted” on compliance.

We now know popular critics determine that HIV turned out to be a “dud”. I hope Coronavirus (which desperate mogul marketers have recently outrageously begun comparing to mythical 1918 Spanish Flu) is remembered as a “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, doubt). On the tail of confusion framing the effervescent threat, political protagonists have overstated urgency more or less from day one. As doctors out in the field regularly reported the effectiveness of standard flu remedies, they were drowned out by “Big Brother’s” incessant war drums. Any pharma-magnate worth his salt was drafted in to produce a magic potion “cure” in double quick time, even though there was no “need” for a cure. An army of doctors congregated against (some even “fellows” of the old boy network), but this wasn’t enough to stop the rot. Billions of dollars worldwide had already been earmarked for vaccines and nothing was going to be allowed to hinder the momentum. Predictably, trials and release of various vaccine options (commerce needs “options”) were rush jobs. So, to recap, intellectuals knew (regardless of politicized rhetoric) there was no pandemic. Doctors said “vaccines are unnecessary”. Serums were produced “on the cheap” (perhaps from old dumped stock), were not tested widely or thoroughly enough. Philosophy applied to research and development was potentially “doomsday pioneering”. By that, I mean, Pasteur’s original edict behind immunization had been all but forgotten. Methods employed harnessed speculative “theories” which were as “justifiable” as notionally flawed contagion modelling. In other words, everything worked perfectly in Noddyland, but in the real world, in our world, they may well have opened doorways to disaster.

Putting “beliefs” to one side, given the undeniably sham nature of the pandemic (the pandemic that wasn’t), we can but speculate as to “why?” There must be purpose behind the whole enterprise. Maybe there is something to Dr. Igor Shepherd’s argument that “Covid-19” represents a one sided psychological military operation targeted to indefinitely neutralize visceral “freedom-fighters” and the reign of any lingering free thought footholds. Regiments of grotesque Google ad click aligned “experts” clad in colourful clothes and oversized shoes jettisoning from miniature cars certainly do give the sense of some sort of absurd circus fanfare, but I feel there is more to it than that. Doubtlessly, and I have already mentioned the fact, quarantine measures that perfectly simulate martial Law containment, as a first of their kind, tell us that, at the very least, we are going through a World (in every sense of the word) War Three “drill”. Naturally, if there hadn’t have been any noteworthy side effects or deaths resulting from “compulsory” (conscription model) vaccinations, considerations exclusively validating the last two years “dress rehearsal” concept might have some sway (aside from the unexplained money drain), but evidence says otherwise. On top of more than a million have been damaged by the “touted” cure, everyone that was double vaxxed has a broken immune system, and that’s looking on the bright side of the statistics. Based on fantasy contagion modelling, a “new” influenza stalked the globe with such velocity, sections of entire population bodies were “infected” within two years with few or no visible effects (beyond what they tell us).

It took several months to draw any correlation between “positive test results”, illness or death and when flu was blamed on Coronavirus, it turned out to be “easily treatable” with standard flu remedies. Vaccines were rushed into action anyway and predictably turned out “relatively” bad. Why? Conclusions seem as clear as day to me. There are three fundamental objectives running simultaneously here. The first (and perhaps most important) is to highlight “Big Brother” rules and those that rebel will be singled out and made examples of. Current “immunization” is a tiny step in a very long term strategy. That step satisfies three other significant trail blazing principles. Everyone must be processed (not just the infirm). Universal inoculation is in the “schedule” (hence, the real reason for Obama healthcare passport) and, most importantly, the deliberate failure of the first batches will permit huge (more than tax exempt, with up to four times investment credits against commercial tax offset) research and development funds to be ploughed into future projects and an endless “marketplace” to “patch”. Population “growth” is a symptom of reproduction so Gate’s cryptic 2010 TED talk remark clearly identifies with revolutionary sterilization techniques, but perhaps there are many simultaneous strategies at play here. Ultimately vaccines might be innocently benign, deliberate sterilization tools, euthanasia aids or a combination depending on population strata targets.

There is another surreal possibility. If it were possible, limiting life expectancy would be another credible fix against accelerating population growth. Might top secret “Therapeutae of Asclepius” have discovered the key to winding down the gene clock, along with antidote “inhibitor”? Could one or all of the inoculation stages (currently a four step process) be designed to cause breakdowns at various critical points of body development. Thus, to impartial observers, symptoms would conceivably interpret as consequences of unexplained “natural” phenomena. Based on that exclusive treatments model, antidotes might be released in the nick of time for those (with deep enough pockets) “worthy of salvation”. This effectively boils down to a bone chilling prime dictum. It wouldn’t matter a fig if the whole world was vaccinated, including rich and famous, because those earmarked to survive would serve the dual purpose of making heroes out of “medical pioneers” authorized to peddle antidotes. Each new crop of infants, each new “next generation”, would automatically be processed by the system just as they are today per schooling mandates. Upon the eventuation of populations potentially dwindling out of existence, excuses supporting removal of the need for vaccination would become potential pivotal headliners for future Big Media hysteria campaigns. And so “the beast” rolls on. Small point, maybe, but if no government “formally” makes vaccination mandatory (across broad populations) does that indicate foundations have already been laid for something really bad to happen in the future, so bad reactions might sponsor the first serious popular bloody uprising against “bureaucracy” and all it stands for?

While on the subject of surreal possibilities, there is one other option that, without a well-argued supporting glossary, might be instantly dismissed as “preposterous drivel”. In earlier essays I observed that the healthcare system was “in awry” following news of our theoretical pandemic. Australian clinics began turning patients away who hadn’t been “tested” and individual surgeries were not equipped to identity “infection”. Only “robotic” process workers (excusing themselves as nurses) at certain strategic hospitals were qualified to run an initial pointless (according to one well versed publically outspoken Scottish physician) intrusive nasal examination. Dithering doctors themselves, generally speaking, “didn’t know” about this new thing going round called “Coronavirus”, although the brave ones were composed enough to review “symptoms” when people testing positive showed signs of malady. In many cases here, prognosis was identical to “the flu” (a fact much later echoed by the WHO) and standard remedies offered proved equally effective. Even so, provincial healing largely championed the whole screaming pandemic concept. Protests from a global consortium of healthcare professionals (which now might number more than eighty thousand now, at a hunch) were emphatically geared towards unhealthy vaccines. Doctors associated with this group felt, on balance, that wearing facemasks did more harm than good and vaccines were an unnecessary extreme risk. On one hand we have ignorance driving cultural progression. On the other, tried and tested methods proved that vaccination requirement “at best” was superfluous.

Some years before, industrialist Elon Musk raved on (…and on) about the human automation. Rude Media ripples began timely oscillations not too long after the Gates Foundation committed to developing its Moderna vaccine, which fringe critics dubbed “the Frankenstein jab” because it proposed to alter cellular DNA progression. There had been no “medicine” like this [known to man] ever made before. Concept had critical thinkers of the ilk of Jon Rappoport “concerned”. Coronavirus, I have mentioned before, was originally blamed on the sun in 1918. Ancient Romans (via their Sol Invictus cult, which evolved into Catholicism) believed that our sun played an essential role in “spiritual evolution” of man; implying a direct link with DNA replenishment. Truth is regularly stranger than fiction and, in my book “The Beauty of existence Decoded”, I explain how the ancient Roman ideology is basically correct. Here conventional rationalists will struggle to keep pace with me, but now is time to move into extra-terrestrial territory. Last article I casually mentioned a “Rome, Italy located Tall White” had been instrumental in the design of our current pandemic psy-op. Tall Whites were first publically identified by American meteorologist Charles Hall after his encounters while stationed at the Nevada desert in the 1960’s. They are a much more recent “version” of human (created 30-40,000 years ago) and live off world.

Below the Draco leadership hierarchy (please visit my other blog for much information about the Draco), they have been bestowed galactic governor status over the affairs on man. Though Charles gave no indication he knew anything about Tall White genetic origins in a 2014 (from memory) Sydney (Australia) presentation I attended, he was under the impression that a Tall White may be used as a surrogate messiah figure at some point in the future, perhaps even soon enough for him to witness the spectacle. You would have thought the best place for a messiah to emerge from would be the Vatican and it just seems too irresistibly fateful that a Tall White is currently located moments away in the Roman capital for that not to be a worthy prediction. There is more. At his talk, Charles categorically stated that changes in our sun were a sort of cosmic birthing process and consequences were going to see a lot more intergalactic traffic in our space neighbourhood and the Tall Whites might “do something” so we (pedestrian mortals) wouldn’t notice so much. Right now the two most aggressive political “side by side” hot potatoes are the pandemic and “climate change”. Isn’t that intriguing? But how does that fit in with vaccines and population reduction?

Well, of course, we know that long before Coronavirus was known (as it is today), a vaccine was being prepared.  It is called Moderna with enterprises fully funded by the Gates Foundation. Though head office is located in the US, could secret work on the vaccine have been initially commissioned in Modena, Italy under authority of the Tall White (now located in Rome, if he hasn’t moved again)? Might, as a consequence, have the extra-terrestrial applied alien techniques to the make-up of the vaccine (intellectual property could easily be distributed to Pfiser, Astra Zeneca et al via the old boy network)? The deeper, billion dollar aligned question is “for what purpose(s)”? Over history, while subject to Draco control, mankind has suffered five separate genetic downgrades administered by frequency fences (delivered via chakra points). In each the case, post impact of frequency fence engagement outcome results did not aggregate as [designers’ had] planned. Additionally, complimenting Sol Invictus ideology, man’s spiritual development had only been slowed down and not halted. With an inevitable ascension looming, a desperate consortium of extra-terrestrials devised a hair brained scheme architected to “disconnect” the Earth’s magnetic field from the sun. However, the tragic impact of 1943 Philadelphia Experience only succeeded in “buckling” the timeline, which currently “jumps” every two decades or so. Could today’s vaccine agenda be yet another attempt at stemming mankind’s developmental ascension?

Maybe just a coincidence, but it seems odd that a big independent survey conclusively demonstrating heavy metal contamination of (globally sampled) vaccines was conducted in Italy, of all countries, in 2016. Biblical Philistines almost certainly ended up in Rome and, after Constantine, the global banking authority shifted to Constantinople. Eventually powers would create a special tax haven in Italy and from 1929 the Vatican was born (from a consolidation of Roman Papal States). Taking the idea that today’s vaccine regime is merely in place to keep things “normal”, one would presume that those able to “slip the net” and remain unvaccinated might eventually inherit some physical advantage over the rest. Is it safe to assume the ascension promises a physical upgrade of humanity? If so, what attributes would upgraded man have that aren’t visible today? In line, might vaccination ultimately be a coarse method to segregate “would be Gods” from “mere mortals”? Naturally, one must remain perennially wary of Musk’s human automaton omen, but might this whole sorry episode, rather than attacking, be designed to block nature? All these questions perhaps with no definitive answers. There is undoubtedly something fishy going on. We simply are not being told the truth.

Complementing a Messianic age is the need for a healthy world. There’s little or no point in prophesizing peace on Earth in the knowledge we are slowly killing ourselves by industriously poisoning our atmosphere. Carbon pollution is the cover story, of course, but without zero emissions, the world is destined to perspire and human being will be one of the unavoidable casualties. Lone New Zealand author Suzy Hanson nailed it in her book “Dual Soul Connection”. “Abductee” of alien grey beings (probably Zetas), she was informed contamination of our atmosphere is “catastrophic”. Within decades, upon current progression, people would start dropping dead like flies in the streets. I periodically highlight the oil industry. Fossil fuel emissions are the root cause of all cancers. Until we move away from petrol, humanity is doomed. Perhaps this is significantly why Elon Musk has invested so heavily in the development of a superior electric car. That would explain why, right now, fully aligned with the fake pandemic, political climate change action is in full throttle. Even so, our “powers” concealing the facts “for” the benefit of humanity would be a world first. Eminent Paul Craig Roberts recent review of said facts sadly determines that obsession to fulfil “the agenda” (per Gary Allen’s “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” outline) on schedule is of greater appeal than ever. In this instance, vaccine caused illness is the excuse to blame freedom of movement.

Roberts knows and identifies ever more farcical standards rise from the proscribed culture of blackmail, bribery (dope for vaxxers) and bullshit, but with all the pantomime and circus fanfare, on the other side, virtue hasn’t gone entirely empty handed. Serial conscientious dissenters are waiting in the wings. Majestic Eric Clapton is leading the charge (and receiving much Media muted praise) as his thundering anti-vaxxer boulder flattens spineless whines from corporate sell-outs. Here’s a prince prepared to commit commercial suicide for the honour of man. For that he deserves sainthood and, sorry, but, screw the queen! There are many lesser mortals fueling the resistance movement, be it most have either been censored by Google (such is the desperation of “the machine”) or drowned out by Murdoch’s foul mouthed hacks. Although, in fairness, Sky News at least has made some contrived effort to balance both sides of the debate. I make no secret of my admiration of the persistent work of Jon Rappoport; one of the rare titans of real journalism. But there are some new kids on the block. Notably the articulate and extraordinarily worthy fresh faced war veteran Adam “FREEDOM!” Kokesh has made sufficient waves to almost get himself banned from Twitter (along with David Icke and Alex Jones). He, in my view, is one of those occasional Messiahs that, though “prepared” by the system, have had fortitude of mind to rise above the bullshit. I do have a video of him smoking the peace pipe, which I see as an excellent remedy to the dystopian hangover some will experienced after reading this essay. So, without any further ado, over to you Mr. Adam Kokesh.

When “Belief in the Saviour” Teases Corrupt Zeal

Traditionally I have regularly released a Christmas or New Year’s thematic to coincide with the so-called festive season. 2018 has proven to be a latecomer, but I refuse to entirely relax standards. Each winter solstice cycle I increasingly notice how little of Christ [from the Greek] is present in Christmas. For instance, there is now more or less a complete void once occupied by goodwill.

Satan devoured it,” howl the sanctimoniously superstitious

Yet superstitions should never be entirely overlooked. Every reflective proverb invariably contains a grain or more of truth. Current advertising beginning as early as “New Year”, embers of the “Phoenician” commerce coup ignited under concessions of Santa around the turn of the nineteenth century. Great threat Cossack Russia helplessly conquered and with America “under administration”, imperialism was to become the unchallenged voice of reason. Maybe Ebenezer Scrooge wasn’t such a bad stick after all, but I will elaborate on this sentiment in due course.

Before I expose the real corruption of Christ, it is important to clear the air over Santa’s ambiguous comeuppance. Back in Rococo times the ice countries may as well have been classed as the known third world. Few were hardy enough to brave the cold, but for occasioned explorers. These courageous travellers were at liberty to export remote tales of old, particularly when absent of viable bounty. In Santa’s case it seems that two convenient folklores converged as one. Whether any original account has been authentically preserved is unlikely, but, suffice to say, vagrant Norwegian sagas concerning an odd mystic figure (elf?) had proliferated out to “the West” by 1815 or ’20.

Historic development of the Western version is much easier to chart. By reputation, one of America’s New York newspapers made timely broadsheet announcements in December 1773 and the follow year. According to promotional content, Dutch families seasonally congregated to honour Saint Nicholas (a monk renowned for his selfless distribution of charity). Plausibly, theorists claim that Saint Nicholas was issued the pet name Sinter Klaas in the local dialect pronunciation. Evolution to Santa Claus is logically coincidental. Back in the early nineteen century, it should be noted that popular drawings presenting Sinter Klaas in contemporary situations barely resemble modern Santa. That commercial effigy is believed to have been the consequence of a life-sized model placed behind a Philadelphia general store window in 1841.

Scandinavian tales refer to a mystic figure that helped the children, although Christkind (Christ’s child) or Kris Kringle is usually considered the parallel German version. The original name (the one sometimes quoted is not authentic) of the historic figure is perhaps lost to time, but I calculate it was the missing ingredient that promulgated a natural evolution to Santa Claus. My use of the word “natural” here is figurative, of course, as there is a sinister side to this account too. Following Scandinavian myths, from around 1820 American businesses heavily invested in Christmas shopping advertising, strategically placed around heart-warming ditties (one can but assume were) inspired by the Norwegian mystic. Printed message cards were to come in en-masse from the late nineteenth century onwards.

Popular iconography attributed to a North Pole setting was introduced (in the West) by Clement Clark Moore, whose 1822 poem “An Account of a Visit from Saint Nicholas” apparently featured quaint eye-catching illustrations. Thomas Nast, cartoonist for Harper’s weekly, adapted visualisations for a feature spread in 1881 which made popular acclaim. Embedded traditions of present day rotund gentleman clad in cheery red suit gestated in the 1890’s. Promptly exploited by the Salvation Army, homeless men dressed in seasonal costumes were commissioned to venture out with the aim of collecting funding donations.

Masonic involvement in the creation of the United States of America is beyond dispute. Whether fabled Illuminati power brokers were the key instrumental agents will possibly never be authentically known or provable. What is unarguably clear is the American union was never set up for the people or, rather, if it was, “the people” were undoubtedly the select few. Propagandists went to work in earnest well before the United States was ratified as “one”. Corresponding messages promoting Christmas spirit in favour of commerce highlighted the ambitions of those that established the new republic. This style of subliminal tradition persevered throughout the occurring human rights’ transformation, perhaps persuasively haunted by Charles Dickens 1843 masterpiece “A Christmas Carol”. Incidentally, British Dickens had also written his Parish Boy’s Progress (more commonly known as Oliver Twist) serial 1837-39 which coincided (sic) with the Abolition of Slavery Act (1837).

I wrote about the truth behind abolition last article and inasmuch stated that no philanthropic goodwill should be attributed to the end of slavery. Human rights were reduced to tatters in order to fortify the needs of burgeoning commerce. One of the significant causal effects, in addition to labour exploitation, unprecedented spikes in crime and prostitution, was the emergence of numerous social charities. I have written about charities independently before too. If governments were truly set up exclusively for the people, then each charity must be viewed as a breakdown of order that highlights supreme jurisdictional incompetence. Today there are supposedly tens of millions of charitable causes which emphasises the ineptitude of governmental social charters. But there is another side to the conspiracy. Great writers like Dickens rarely (if ever) meaningfully expose the indelible link between charity and trade. Charities usually place funds in the care of the banking system available to purchase goods or services before converting them into “aid”. Funds not needed “in the field” are invariably locked into attractive interest bearing long term deposits. British “custodian of charities” (a corporate collective catering for tens of thousands of organisations) used to be listed second place below British Telecom at the stock exchange, so it is a lucrative cash cow.

Dickens’ squint vision is enough to convince me he worked for the overlords. Why else would have he been allowed to make fame and fortune? If his writings had viciously attacked “the system”, no one would know of them today. Without doubt his “hallmark” powerfully creative style made endorsement decision making easy. His deeply human approach surely would have been considered gravy topping by his endorsers. For example, “A Christmas Carol” (or “Scrooge”) did highlight the plight of the working classes, but the manner as to how merchants and those that governed exploited working classes was matter of fact, the way things are. In effect, Dickens ended up posthumously begging for charity from his betters. That was the limit of his militancy. Indeed, in the Victorian age knowing your place had been a very long standing belief attached to birth provenance (i.e. the result of karmic deliverance). Perhaps this is why he was allowed to paint such a bleak picture. Other of his novels feature “poor houses” (paid slavery) and debtors’ prisons, so it would be unfair not to lightly applaud aspects of his pioneering effort towards social conscience.

In fact he was far from the only dissenting voice of that era. Beginning with comparatively humble numbers from the late eighteenth century onward, by high Victorian times published attacks on “the system” had just about reached fever pitch. A significant side effect to all this is worth exploring. There have been many revisions of the English Bible, from the seventh century AD. A formal Revised Standard Version of the New Testament was first published in 1881 and this was largely a consequence of inertia of “social conscience movements” (notably who were alarmed by the excess of prostitution) in my opinion. British politicians such as William Gladstone expressed their dedication to God (apparently regularly administering sermons to fallen women), although it seems ironic that these individuals have been responsible for imposing some of the most acrid and draconian legislation on the people.

Cultivation of various popular “beacons of hope” was burgeoning commerce’s key strategy investment geared to combating radical dissent in such forms as suffrage protest. Christmas Santa was one such icon. It seems to me that it has been no accident seasonal spirit appears to engage commerce at any opportunity. In that capacity, Santa is the Christmas star perched on a commerce peak. Dickens’ criticism of Scrooge’s lack of commercial goodwill by not paying staff adequately empowered seasonal trading. For lack of better words, when [otherwise] slaves are affluent enough, they can buy more goods and chattel to ensure business perpetually booms. Broadsheets promoted charitable initiatives favouring trade long before the US republic (1789) was established. Santa, by hook or by crook, became a convenient figurehead or mascot. However, review of naming protocols places dark questions regards the ethics and ambitions of those that pioneered the Grotto cult. There is more to Santa Claus than is obvious.

Far from being a saviour, he has been known to splinter families consumed by obsessive greed. Those without funds sufficient for merriment (as Dickens bitterly highlights) are ostracised by “goodwill”. There is a giant clue as to why this is so, but I first need to provide a little background before I detail it. My other website offers many articles that cover esoteric and paranormal affairs. Coincidentally Satan was the feature of one long essay there. I say coincidentally because it is fairly well known that Santa also happens to be an anagram of Satan. In normal circumstances one would put the fact down to quirks of language, but can we be sure connections are accidental or arbitrary here?

Explanations will become a little complex because I first need to allay popular confusion over origins and meaning of Satan. In fact, while I am about it, I may as well cover doppelganger Lucifer too. Satan, for instance, is a very ancient term that stretches back long prior to Atlantis. Sanskrit is the closest dialect I have found representative of the “universal” first language that failed to survive Atlantis’ downfall (hinted at in biblical Genesis’ Tower of Babel). In that regard, perhaps all words were originally collective monotones and, with this in mind, Satan conveniently breaks into “sat” and “an”. In Sanskrit pronunciation reflectively impacts word values, so “sat” and “an” could each be attributed to mean many different things. Therefore, in the interest of correctness, I have had to draw on inherent sources to establish compelling historic and interpretative basis from considerations.

“An” is the easy part. Several ancient tongues use the syllable to signify “Almighty God”. In combination with Almighty God, various meanings of “sat” might satisfy differing wider metaphoric interpretations. Though the fact appears to have escaped surviving chronicles, Satan was the first star to ever bless the cosmos (actually initially revered as the Blessed Star). All stars deliver light. In spiritual context, light is sometimes called logos (which is the Greek word for information). Spiritually, “logos” extends way beyond mere information. It is the essence of truthful purity or, in other words, the word of God. “Sat” is the Sanskrit equivalent of this conceptualisation. Lucifer admirably compares. That name derives from the Latin and means “light” (lux) “standard” (fer). Morning Star (Lucifer) competing with the sun (Ra) as it rises based on biblical Isaiah’s (an unrepentant Pharisee) radical sermon is generally regarded as the significant origin of the usage.

Also worthy of mention, Akhenaten’s Amon (usually erroneously referred to as Amen) conspicuously forms an “Almighty God” (A-n) sandwich casing “m’o” (divine record) filling. Thus, strictly speaking Satan, Lucifer and Amon/Amen all mean the same thing (more or less), which is bringer of good news. Actually, wasn’t that what they called Jesus too? Nevertheless, I have explained elsewhere how the general message over time has been twisted into opposite meanings by miscreants with rogue agendas. Today the direct effect is both Satan and Lucifer have been reversed from bringers of good news to evil omens. Specifically, Satan [in Hebrew tongue] simply means accuser. The development of Satan as “the tempter” did not emerge until the late sixteen century, though attributing philosophies were clearly embedded in Martin Luther’s earlier rhetoric. Luther (himself a Jesuit) strongly influenced contemporary masonic alliances. Masonry is not the sinister cabal delineated by superstition. Merchants would normally associate themselves with one group or another in order to network out of trading necessity. The massively beneficial spin off was it made collusion and coordinated commerce strategies possible.

Not all collaborations were gracious. When stakes were high, gross acts of tyranny or injustice were sometimes deemed “end justifying”. One such conspiracy toppled Britain’s constitutional monarch Charles I, who was beheaded on 30th January 1649 as a consequence. Even so, after that atrocious standard had been set, beginning with his son puppet king Charles II’s reinstatement, the universal demise of sovereign royal power is probably best marked by Catherine “the Great” (no wonder they call her great) of Russia’s turbulent reign. Violent anarchism was an offshoot of that operation. Since Michael Romanov’s (nephew of Ivan the Terrible) 1613 accession to the Russian throne, there had always been disturbance with Cossack settlers (displaced Polish serfs who termed themselves “free men”). In accordance, numerous popular uprisings against authorities have been reported from 1591. Out of all these, it is the 1768 Ukrainian (Koliyivshchyna) religious massacre that probably most pertinently marks an authority shift. Reputation says killing was sparked by Catherine the Great’s “Golden Charter” (1765) which enabled retired colonel and cleric Maksim Zalizniak’s ambitions. Their joint mission was dedicated to purging Catholics and other religious minorities.  Politically correct historians are quick to denounce the Golden Charter (which also targeted Jews) as “utter fantasy” in order to preserve the queen’s “spotless” reputation.

Encyclopaedia Britannica’s first edition is dated 1770. From 1770-75 Russia is proclaimed the world’s greatest nation. By 1776 she may as well have been a sickly dog.  Many theories attribute reasons leading to the country’s downfall, but it seems to me that government ownership of the Orthodox Church from 1721 marked the beginning of the end so to speak. Post revolution “Communist” Jew Leon Trotsky’s unrelenting all-reaching attack on that administration was certainly no coincidence. Populations had been galvanised by the church. Replace it with alternative convenient social apparatus and you have society in your pocket. Russians were (and perhaps still are) extremely parochial and rather superstitious. This is well highlighted by the way they celebrate Christmas. According to legend, Babouschka (old woman or granny) misled the three kings (search for Christ) by giving the wrong directions. The Russian birth date for “Jesus’” is 6th January but festivities honour Babouschka’s eternal regret for her deceit.

Historians might convincingly argue fledgling United States of America’s journey to superpower status began in 1776 (phoenix rising from mother Russia’s ashes?). Constitutional democracy ended in 1789 when the republic (in Philistine Greece and Italy’s wake?) was formed (and currency changed), but it took until 1864 (ushering in the 14th Amendment to the constitution) for government to be reduced to a corporation. Commerce was the primary reason the United States was formed but it took the best part of a century (1776-1864) for satanic agents to exact their full plan. Today all governments (and their tax offices) are corporations and that is why the modern world is held to ransom by merchant bankers. I find it mildly ironic that it is in the powers’ best interests for people to “wake up” to truth which is of next to no advantage to egregious saviours’ causes. This suggests, at the very least, that all (or the majority of) revolution philosophies have been sponsored by the precise same powers that impose tyranny. These false rites of passage were sponsored because the deceivers knew they were guaranteed dead ends.

To define true evil, I regularly reference a quote attributed to the great sage Krishna “Spirituality (impetus behind creation) brings to freedom, whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What better way to paralyse than by introducing appealing commerce. Humanity would not be able to resist aiding and abetting the devil (d-evil). I don’t refer to the satisfaction of genuine “needs” here, although commerce can accommodate those too. No, here I exclusively identify non-essential extras; frills of commerce. Some argue that the introduction of pomp surrounding royalty (which has endured so long) is pointless. Lemurian monarchs for periods that precede historic record were visually indistinguishable from the people. Very ancient kings were blessed with God-like powers. They could be distinguished by deed. Today certainly, beyond their overstated assigned status and privileged upbringing, royals are no different to the everyman. At Christmas, pomp and celebration of non-essential extras is now encapsulated by iconic smirking Santa which suggests it is those behind commerce that crafted the whole idea of aristocratic superiority.

Is the clue in Santa’s name; perfect anagram of Satan? By the time of this red frocked (isn’t the devil usually depicted coloured red?) tempter’s universal notoriety, negative connotations of Satan were firmly entrenched. Indeed, so much so no one had heard of the Blessed Star (in relation to the creation of our universe) by then. Such is the case today as well of course. I presented some detail in relation to the truth (and reasoning behind it) that negative Satan was actually originally the mispronunciation of “Saturn” (from medieval times, although I think this reflects attitudes under Prophet Zoroaster thousands of years before) in this article. “Design” of Santa appears to vaguely follow the Babylonian Horus myth. Indestructible God could only be chopped up and hidden. In this instance “An” has been remorselessly sliced in two, “n” crudely wedged between “sa” and “t”. “A” brings up the rear and represents perennial impotence of spirituality under Santa’s spell. God is vanquished (decapitated) and his wisdom (sat) corrupted.

But for Babouschka, Christmas (Epiphany) would be mostly a hangover from the Pagan era. Evergreen trees (in particular) represent celebration of the winter solstice. From time memorial, tradition has always seen exchange of gifts, but pagans honoured their harvest, so communities would contribute fresh fruits and vegetables for the benefit of society. “The Feeding of Five Thousand” New Testament parable was scripted by Mark (or Marcus, a Roman aristocrat) and therefore one should question its purpose all the more. Though communal sharing of fish and loaves suggests so, it is unlikely Jesus (Josephus) ever administered a true harvest festival dedicated to the winter solstice. The Romans, on the other hand, did worship solar cycles. Sun-day is a tribute to that legacy. Per context, the alert may struggle to fathom why I bother to discuss this now, given Jesus’ notorious “Jewish” status. Let me explain why. Long prior to Roman involvement, Judaism had split in two. City folks followed autocratic regimes promulgated by those generally known as Pharisees. It is a style of “order” remains alive and well today, underpinning up-to-date management of global affairs. Back then remote, displaced tribes were guided by (what the right-wingers’ would term) superstitious philosophies which prepared for different “ways of life”.

Their brand of raw spirituality was in fact encapsulated by the essence of numerous of splinter groups and these had journeyed out to the four corners of the globe in search of paradise (colloquially referred to as Promised Land). One such autonomy was the foundation of ancient druids (not even vaguely similar to garish abuse, late eighteenth century neo-druidism). Rural “Essene” Jews were labelled Gnostics for a while. Though historians remember it as a new tradition from the time of Jesus, it is likely the 570BC exodus to Ireland (Promised Land designate) consisted of likeminded parties of anti-Levite (Pharisaic law makers) “revolutionaries”. These embers of civilisation plausibly could have “morphed into” the later druidic tradition, made more notorious by Avalon (spiritual centre and first mystery school?), which is located in southern England. If memory serves me correctly, America’s Pilgrim Fathers formally constituted a southern English gathering in search of purity. The point I am trying to make is there has been a persisting religious dichotomy ever since man reflected on his divinity. Judaism, God forbid, is probably one of the better examples of that

Celebration of the solstices seems a likely component of Gnostic tradition. Unfortunately, other than newly found (and possibly censored) bundles of esoteric texts hidden in Dead Sea catacombs and other discreet places, evidence of that faith was destroyed long ago. Neo-druids make a big hullaballoo over solstice traditions whereas I suspect the Gnostics treated these occasions as opportunities to educate. What better way to manufacture goodwill while celebrating nature could there be than a harvest festival? The idea of community sharing for everyone’s benefit is instilled in “The Feeding of Five Thousand” parable. Did Mark’s account confuse a solstice event? Perhaps we’ll never know, but, per context, the fish and loaves are distinct spiritual symbols and shouldn’t be viewed liberally. Celts (original druids) in particular revered divinity as something directly attributed to creative potence. They determined that all life came from primordial waters (something modern science propagandises?). If primordial waters constitute God’s physicality, then fishes’ mastery of oceans must be inspirationally hallowed. The Lord’s Prayer “praises God for our daily bread”.

Tribes, such as those that became the druids, who didn’t revere pharisaic order, separated and found new havens (free of tyranny) to root. It is difficult to pinpoint the precise transition which is the branch that became modern day Judaism. Hebrew was originally a cut down cosmic script. For instance, additional unknown letters are occasionally seen interspersed with Hebrew on downed alien spaceships’ insignia. It is known that today’s long standing Yiddish culture backed off New Hebrew because Old Hebrew was insufficient for competent business communication. The “pointing” of Hebrew text (which in practicality adjusts for a new language) possibly coincided with first world universal adoption of stamped currency (legal tender). Accurate dates are deliberately vague on origins of pointing; maybe 12th, 13th or 14th century depending on opinions. Does this vainly cover up the Khazarian Yiddish pact emanated from the Ukraine? As an aside, though the Ukraine is sometimes volunteered, it could not have possibly ever been fabled Khazaria as that land mass is submerged under oceans today. There is however compelling innuendo that posits for a plausible case recommending the Ukraine is viewed as the motherland by certain estranged Pharisees.

Few bother to even attempt to comprehend the severe civil consequences of legal tender. Enslaved populations are the product of oppressive and tyrannous welfare states which cannot exist unless supported by currency. Therefore, industrialist vipers initially introduced serfdom gradually, confusing the “free” into believing that this was an effect of their zealous benevolence. Once everyone was “captured”, oligarchs expanded traditional uses of prisons for purposes of “containing” those whom they did not want to socially enable (crude justifications supported by laws came later). Bonded slavery became the only viable social security option for those displaced by war, famine or for other reasons.

Truth surrounding vile treachery of the Magna Carta (marking the point at which silver currency exploded) is obscured by cheery tales of Robin Hood and his band of crafty thugs. As a treaty, it wasn’t a charter of goodwill towards the people. It in fact was open theft of free lands and the negotiated common rights of man. Courtesy of the Magna Carta, the vast majority of our modern populations could not live off the land effectively now, even if we were forced to do so and that is why industrialists lord over the document’s prowess so heartily. Rich or poor, mighty or lowly, we have all by some measure been transformed into slaves of currency. They say money makes the civilised world go round. That is why those with the most money invariably have all the privileges.

Where it came from God only knows, but there is a tragic old wives’ tale that supposes the ills of humanity are the fault of the Midas effect. Those with wealth are singled out as evil doers even though everyone (without exception) is greedy (sometimes euphemised as will to survive). The humble do not know extravagance so they neither desire nor solicit it. Most elites merely exploit human nature to the hilt, though they may not be fully cognisant of the fact. The reason Santa has become so popular is he epitomises the averice of the masses. That is more than amply highlighted in Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol”. Goodwill is leveraged to such effect that crippled “Tiny Tim” deserves to have the litter of his family’s desires steeped on him at Christmas for merely existing. Of course this selfish anthem ignores those hard to rectify gaping double standards. Why would “rich” Scrooge bestow gifts on relative strangers in place of his own loved ones? The real issue, how Tiny Tim’s father persevered under such irresponsible employment terms, is not discussed.

Well, they didn’t have unions then”, screams a heckler

Incorrect, but it will take an eternity for sovereign man to grow a backbone. The power of labour values ironically has always been very much in the hands of the people. If everyone refused work and put death as the preference over slavery, currency would have been rendered valueless from conception and commerce would have never commenced (in the known sense). From the point currency was introduced, a utopian objective has been to shackle the broad masses. Peer group infiltration and targeted populism were the chosen control strategies (branded psyops) used to fulfil the objective. From the day men communicated with each other, money (cuts of silver, gold talents, precious beads) and other arbitrary tokens of value have always been used to supplement barter trade.

Currency is different. Units are stamped by (and the overriding possession of) an administrative authority. Originally that would have been a constitutional royal. Now stock ownership is hybrid. Who is this Federal Reserve? Those that use the merchandise are subject to governing philosophies and rules. A dollar cannot morph into a million units of value because “someone” decides this is so, whereas administrative overseers might revalue a dollar if they decided the act was politically expedient. Germany’s inflation was a deliberate act. Other competing paper currencies were only partially backed by gold, but the illustrious Federal Reserve turned a blind eye. Whilst apparently contractually bound as servants (polite word for slaves) of government, they were able to turn a blind eye because they own all “backed” circulated money.

Wholesale cash enterprises were developed first by the Greeks and then by the Romans, even though the oldest surviving currency (assuming science is correct) originates from Russia. Subsequent European coinage values were extensions of the Roman legacy. It would be hard to formally prove (particularly as reference maps show Philistinia approximates the modern Palestinian territory region), but logic supposes that the Greeks and Romans were descendants of relocated Philistines (tall pale skinned warriors). Retreating from defeat by Babylonian Pharaoh and “Jewish” King David, Philistines first settled in Greece (on the doorstep of the Middle East). Since “great” Alexander’s conquest to rule the world ran out of steam, Greek politics apparently favoured secular complacency over global conquest. Hamstrung industrialists shifted their affairs to Italy and, over several centuries, built sufficient military infrastructure to commit to their globalist ambitions once more.

Incidentally, not at all Middle Eastern in appearance, then Babylonian peoples would have been classed as “Caucasians” by today’s sciences. Therefore notorious King David would have been a white man. Though only circumstantial evidence supports claims he was a Pharaoh, inherent sources advise me information is relatively accurate (i.e. the wrong pharaoh is referenced as culprit), which places grave questions as to the authenticity behind the popular legacy of Israel of course. History is far from circumspect here. For example those dreadful “Greek” Hyksos Kings that “conveniently” appeared to take rule when Babylon was lacking authority were likely Philistines, yet Josephus eerily reports them as Israelites. I say these were the first usurpers; these were Pharisees who support a fabricated Levite Alta ego.

By deduction, this would mean the “great” Caesar was a Philistine as well. Limited writings about him present a grave paradox. According to surviving texts, he was some kind of popular miracle working Ben Hur. Such are the qualities of his proposed divinity; some might rightly be compelled to believe he was Jesus. Of course this adds to the case that persuades Mark was a Roman aristocrat who cast Jesus in the Homeric style, perhaps even as an attempt to preserve the image of Caesar. The evocation would have made both instantly popular figures even if real lives didn’t quite live up to the reputation. Infiltration of peer groups and targeted populism is achieved in one fell swoop. More evidence is as follows. Peer group infiltration is embodied by Mark “Iscariot’s” treacherous conversion to Gnosticism (and later St Paul’s Damascus Road epiphany). There is no more popular false occult icon than Jesus.

Prognosis therefore is depressingly melancholy. Beyond the use of occasional repeated proverbs, not a single book found in the New Testament even vaguely resembles authentic Essene philosophy, including “John”. Scholars that first take the plunge and brave any of the Dead Sea Scrolls’ codexes are quick to notice the profound intellectual depth of content (making embedded philosophies extraordinarily hard to interpret correctly). Gospel writer Mark was Roman, Luke Greek and Matthew was a cosmopolitan Jew and obvious agent of the Pharisees. Enigmatic John didn’t exist, but the name (in its use) implies “God’s secretary”. His, the Fourth Gospel, was dictated by Josephus (as Jesus) through brother-in-law scribe Lazarus. One word only of Jesus’ personal volume has survived. Someone (perhaps many) in authority knows the truth about this.

Jesus’ own gospel was purposefully destroyed and the celebrated surviving second century papyrus was not a copy. It is a forgery. If it had been authentic, how could the document have dodged Philistine Constantine’s mighty fourth century purge?  Outright censorship of texts that contradicted or impeded Sol Invictus faith was the only literary amnesty of his inquisition. Catholicism’s Papacy was the removed Roman monarchy; therefore it was also yet another Philistine/Pharisee offshoot. The reason St Paul (author of New Testament Corinthians, Romans and so on) is occasionally recognised as the first pope (and last apostle) is to give his detestable writings (which smother any occasional glint “free of Romanisation” emulating the conscience of Jesus) greater credibility (and popularity, of course). Paul’s calculated role generally seems to suggest sour grapes after good times gone awry. Should the “Ideal” Jesus have gracefully “wallpapered” the uncomfortable political “marriage” between the Pharisees and de facto Royalty?

Look, I’m not sure when the Sanhedrin originally came into being or whether it really matters, but I notice a familiar pattern with “world affairs” stretching back at least the most part of two and a half thousand years. History informs me the Romans conquered lands located in the region now called the Middle East. Their haul included Israel (conquered by Assyrians centuries before). A consequence of one of the first acts of power was to usher in hybrid Arab (ethic nomads that roamed Aram or were these Assyrians or even Phoenicians?) royals to rule over Judea (separatist Southern Israel). First “despot” of the official Promised Land Moses (who compares well against England’s Oliver Cromwell) never referred to arbitrary bodies when making decisions. Tradition (after the burning bush) revered him as the direct link to God. All great prophet kings follow identical protocol, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Noah and the rest. Their decisions were their own and these “commandments” were a testament upholding their uniformly breath taking “greatness”. Nevertheless, when the Sanhedrin (or royal court) emerged sovereign rule was doomed to wither. Under Israel’s Roman occupation, that evolution was furiously ignited.

Though government is meant to be a mix of identities that reflect the goodwill of society, by reputation decision making almost always errs towards right wing (fascist) mindset. Values imposed by Sanhedrin courts depressingly crafted that motif

Reflecting on contemporary politics of Jesus’ age, overbearing Roman authority paid lip service to the whims of their puppet Arab monarchs provided they observed all the wishes of the Pharisees (who took the high seat in the Sanhedrin). That said, certain Roman emperors didn’t see things their way. Look how these (such as Caligula and Nero) have been “painted” (i.e. utter fabrication) by “history”. Judea was abandoned (allegedly) after the 66-69AD siege of Jerusalem (a chain reaction sparked by earlier infractions under Nero). Within moments of the exodus a new fully fledged “Christian” hierarchy pops up in Alexandria. Infrastructure is so strong; its governing church is effectively born as a corporation. Therefore, transferring authority to Constantinople was child’s play after the papacy was formally established in the late fourth century.

Emergence of this virgin Catholic Church exactly coincides with the shocking disappearance of the great Roman Empire. Over several centuries, the same Catholic Church made a bee-line to exert control over every single credible European monarchy. This is more than amply highlighted by records of battles against the Merovingian kings, which included the calculated murder of Dagobert II. The Catholic Church had become (by accident or design) a sort of universal Sanhedrin, which is made all the more interesting because the Jewish version abandoned its administrative authority after the second temple (though some argue it never existed) was “allegedly” levelled by fire. Thus far I have contemplated numbers of suggestions that could never be “proven”, but could it be argued the Nicolaitans were instrumental at re-establishing the defunct Sanhedrin apparatus in Constantinople?

There is more fuel for the fire, if we move the clock forward a bit. King Henry VIII of England did the unthinkable in 1534. After a bitter divorce with Spanish royal Catherine of Aragon, he excommunicated the pope and formed his own Church of England. That is why the vicious catholic versus protestant wars persisted long after his death. Thomas Moore chose death in absence of moral sovereignty, but the rot had begun to set in long before, even while bonny Henry was still in power. The Roman “Sanhedrin” had only been temporarily usurped by the monarch. It wasn’t long before Henry was surrounded by pious advisors, such as prominent “world’s richest man” Cardinal Woolsey. Only a smidgen over a century after Henry’s desperate act, pharisaic authorities decided they needed to well and truly shore things up (and claim deserved revenge). This culminated with the execution death of Charles I in 1649 mentioned earlier, of course.

For the first time in history (unlike the Greek and Roman Republics before) a civilian government shielded power beneath “protector” Cromwell, but fame went to his head and he proved more deistic than any king. That is the ostensive reason behind the government’s swift (1660) re-establishment of the British monarchy, which remains intact today. It was deemed an essential safety measure against any parochial ruling authority. King William’s 1696 rushed though Bill of Rights amply acknowledges the viperous nature of man (particularly when given responsibility). To the best of my knowledge, every subsequent constitution (such as America’s) has built in its own bill of rights. For the record, though we have been programed to believe that royal executive power was devoid of peer oversight prior to corporate takeover, the myth simply isn’t true. Monarchs were presumed appointed by God (perhaps after Moses) and, as such, bound to honour their constituents. Suffice to say some kings turned out more attentive than others. That in mind, when factoring in the emergence of outsourced legislation via organs such as the Sanhedrin, the deep question I find rather hard to resolve is “who was the last true king?”

Who is the rightful king is important. Gospel writer Matthew’s biblical genealogy was aimed at promoting Jesus as the hereditary Messiah (priest-king or “Christ” subject to certain terms and conditions), but was it David or Zechariah (Jesus’ uncle) that established precedence? Zechariah was not a pharaoh nor did he have any conceivably legitimate claim to Babylonian rule. Pharaoh David set up the twenty four priestly branches (spawning king making material) that were each to be deemed valid natural contenders for the Jewish throne. It seems to me that without intimate understanding of David or any of the many hierarchical values that bestowed him with power, ignorance over what substantiates “royalty” from pedestrian “rank and file” will perennially reign. Usurpers naturally capitalise on this schism. Indeed, the truth would be enough to bring down their phoney baloney house of cards.  Dissenting historians irregularly report of the wisdom of the Oannes, but where is it to be found now?

Jesus is fantasy, a marketing brand that coordinates a very special historic period. He was the event which preceded Philistine formal grasp of absolute power. Therefore, modern traditions that prepare a muted, ineffective “Saviour” emphasise corporate will to control (Scrooge had absolute autonomy over directions of conscience). In other words, when the huddled masses are suitably impoverished and hope lacking, their only alternative is to turn to corporate commerce (big government) for succour. That is predominantly why the “machine” has relentlessly pushed a socialist agenda over the last hundred years or so. Now the hundred years is up, we are very close to “end game”. Australia’s prime minister is a billionaire (or so rumour has it). America’s president Trump is a tycoon. America is the first “first world” country. Australia is the last “first world” dominion. This tells anyone that understands the “code” that the oligarch’s are now brash enough to boast “we’ve won and there’s nothing [you] the people can do about it”.

I have written about the truth behind Jesus “the person” at length before, but it is worth repeating additional detail again to bring some extra clarity to this essay. Anagrammatised Josephus equates to “give birth to Jesus” in Latin tongue. It is such a clever anagram; “metaphor” is implied through use of letters P, H and O. I am also aware that “J” is obsolete so, in this case, whatever normally replaces it works just as well. One of the apocryphal books casts the young Jesus so well educated in theological matters it is presumed he was the son of a High Priest. Josephus’ father was Matthias Joseph, a High Priest of the 24th line from David (i.e. as illustrated earlier, royal blood). Militant Jesus attacking money changers at the temple was so contextually uncharacteristic, whoever it was clearly wasn’t preaching Jesus (isn’t it “odd” that Philistine Catholicism forbade money lending entirely on those grounds and this legitimised Jewish banking, coincidence?). Sermon on the Mount from Matthew’s Gospel presents a pensively angry prophet, but not a violent one. My inherent sources report that the young militant man was none other than Jesus’ (or, rather, Josephus’) father (who also used the codename Barabbas).

According to these sources, in his youth, Matthias Joseph joined the revolutionary movement and was impassioned by the royal cause against Roman tyranny. Because Arab puppet kings met most (if not all) of the Pharisees’ wishes, Zealots (as these revolutionaries became known) were doubtlessly not too fond of the extreme right-wing establishment either. This presents a problem for those determined to rationalise the truth, which is embroiled in politics that are quite complicated. To extend my observation of the young revolutionary Barabbas who attacked the money changers, he was arrested and convicted of a serious offense. Theologians that have bothered to study contemporary Roman law almost universally agree that Jesus did nothing (as visually evident in the numerous religious records) to warrant arrest, less crucifixion. Roman Philistines did impose very harsh penalties (up to death) on any party that disrupted the supply chain (commerce). Moneychangers at the temple would have provided commercial supply and they were undeniably [violently] disrupted by Barabbas (under pseudonym).

The physical crucifixion event (per its convenient placement in various New Testament writings) was used metaphorically. I shall discuss metaphorical terms shortly. For now, let me focus on the event. Some have noted that the crucifixion was conducted on private land, which was unusual. In Jesus’ case, this would imply that Barabbas was either extremely rich, well connected or both. The land, we learn, belonged to prominent local business man Joseph of Arimathea, whose international business holdings were reputedly centred at Cornwall, England (Gnostic-Druid heartland). Josephus’ scribe was Lazarus, son of Joseph of Aramithea. Jesus’ “wife” was Mary Magdalene, Lazarus’ sister, so there are logical family connections here. As Miriam (Mary) has rather negative connotations (suggesting bereavement) in ancient Hebrew, it is not widely used. Mary, on the other hand was a very popular contemporary Roman given name, particularly in royal circles, as it bestowed heritage. Given this background, I am already questioning whether there was an actual crucifixion, whether the event was purely metaphorical? Ancient chroniclers were afforded great liberty in the way they expressed themselves. Therefore knowing how to read between the lines correctly is the key to understanding hallowed texts.

Before I discuss validity of the crucifixion in more depth, I need to make a few more associated observations. Presumption Mary Magdalene was never called Miriam suggests she was prominent Roman offspring. Could this mean the Joseph of Aramithea had taken a Roman Philistine wife? Was she of royal lineage (hence selecting Mary as the given name for her daughter)? I am compelled to believe that she would have been extremely important for Joseph to be on first name terms with Pontius Pilate, Roman Governor of Judea. Turning to Inherent sources once more, I am informed that a royal marriage was brokered between Barabbas (Jesus’ father) and another Mary. If, as some scholars like to posit, Jesus was a family member of the Piso emperor class, that lineage could only have come via his mother (as his father was a Jewish royal). Should this prove sufficiently correct, it would explain why the Catholic Church gives the Madonna such bloated “eternal” status against puny “dead” Jesus on the cross. Congregations from all over the globe flock to touch her miracle working effigies.

Presuming a marriage had been brokered between “Mary” (euphemistically known as mother of Jesus) and Matthias Joseph (father of Josephus who “gave birth to” and was literal Jesus), contemporary politics would have been revolutionised (endorsing the Pharisees’ political intrigue). In conjunction, the undeniably hard to resolve question is “why did the Pharisees back clemency in favour of Barabbas (father of Jesus)?” unless there is more to solving the puzzle than meets the obvious eye.  Does this suggest that Jesus was a recalcitrant heir (hinted at in the Prodigal Son parable)? If Matthias Joseph was an integral part of the establishment, then Josephus almost certainly defied the wishes of the father. Failure of his preaching tour in the Nazareth region highlights the discontentment. Nazareth, at the time, was a hub for the well-to-do and privileged classes, so naturally political preferences erred towards hard-line right-wing philosophies. One can but presume that Matthias Joseph, as the bastion of civilised society and honoured revolutionary, had strong ties to religious order (i.e. the Pharisees). Josephus was comparatively Bohemian (again implied in the Prodigal Son parable).

Whilst alien to traditional Gnostic writings, all Gospels identify Jesus as a renegade preacher who associated with undesirables (“outcasts”). He is both against the rooted establishment (though quotes from “Law” at every opportunity) and oppressed civilisation (measuredly). Socialist content embedded in sermons would fare so well, proverbs have been adopted by modern day democracy movements. Courtesy of his royal status, Josephus did have friends in high places that shielded him, but they were still pillars of mundane society that were forced to corrupt certain values to remain in power (and use aliases when assisting renegade causes). This is perhaps casually camouflaged by Jesus’ association with outcasts (inwardly well meaning, but outwardly dishonest). Therefore modern day belief in “the Saviour” relies on corrupt zeal. Zeal, in turn, has transformed into a fanaticism cultivated by corporate religions. Individual beliefs are singular matters of faith, whereas idolatries become authorities for those that chose to apply “so called” blind faith (a grotesque form of ignorance).

Individual beliefs must be questioned to improve constancy, whereas determined authority erodes opportunity for zealous fidelity

Jesus would share Josephus’ birth year of 37AD, unless historic accuracy is obscured here. There are niggling problems with this date particularly when factoring in the most practical chronology allowing for his two and a half year ministry. The Siege of Jerusalem is the obvious choice as a correlating time period which I would say is the only plausible term of upheaval within range significant enough to profitably bolster a prophetic preacher’s missionary tour. His audience would have predominantly been Jews recoiling from ever widening Roman reprisals. Under such conditions, the siege must have been deemed the “final straw”. Adding to my case, Jesus’ journey has been retraced by geographical experts. Median chronology fits against the siege timeline like a glove, therefore I deduce the ministry ran from 64-66AD and that is why the first Gospel by Mark was published sometime after 68AD (long enough to source witnesses, conduct interviews, correlate notes, write, edit and publish a manuscript). There was no oral period as has been “supposed”, because it made no sense anyway. The contemporary Jewish connotation of what was meant by “Messiah” (then) is very different to the hybrid evolution (distortion) that prepares our modern day Catholic sacrificial Son of God “Christos” (or Christ) who “died for our sins”.

Considering proximity against the siege, details of Josephus’ geographic movements do appear to cultivate the “swashbuckler dodging authorities” narrative line. That’s why Jerusalem under siege was last stop – a fait accompli. According to Matthew’s Gospel, one of Jesus’ first acts (after collecting his posse of disciple bodyguards) was to request baptism from his cousin John (son of Zechariah). Traditionally a Jew reached maturity at age thirty, yet was the 37AD birthdate to be correct, then Josephus would have been twenty seven years old if the chronological positioning was accurate. Although the Roman equivalent was age twenty five, there is another explanation. Hebrew chroniclers did not necessarily place events in correct historic order. Prosperity very much justified the means. It seems more likely, in which case, that Jesus was baptised at the end of his ministry when he had built experience worthy of exalted blessing. Authority did not make purges against perceived threats until after the siege (identifying why there was a rapid exodus away from the region directly after 70AD). That is when John the Baptist (contender for the Jewish throne) would have lost his head. Josephus was only spared from the inquisition because of his royal Roman blood.

Mentioned earlier, Jesus was not crucified as there was nothing he did that could justify the punishment under Roman law.  His father, under the pseudonym Barabbas, may have gone through a ceremonial or mock crucifixion. Perhaps others followed suit, such as Simon of Cyrene, to honour the event. Ambiguous Turin Shroud (under care of the Catholic Church – that should instantly raise alarm bells) is a prop designated to fool believers. Beyond doubt, the item belonged to Jacques De Molay Grand Master of the Knights Templar, though only Michael Baigent has had the courage to attest truth in his mainstream publication (Holy Blood, Holy Grail 1982) for my research. Following Molay’s heresy conviction (under Catholicism), he was crucified (1314) in a manner that traced details laid out in the New Testament texts.

Metaphorically, depending on the event’s positioning, in the biblical context, the crucifixion represents the death of Gnosticism, whereas resurrection equals triumphant rebirth in the form of Christianity. The very earliest brand is likely to be Arianism. We can see the stem of Arian-ism is Arian or Aryan, so this should volunteer major questions from the alert. Didn’t Hitler worship a mythical Aryan race? In fact, of all the ancient (pre-biblical) races “Ceres” is the type that most closely represents Ayran characteristics. Significantly, Aryans are attributed to be pure Atlantis stock (alien genes were added to replenish humanity after the fall). This fits the overall picture, because traditions (including a weight of generally unrecorded information referenced from inherent sources) suggest the Gnostics went to extraordinary lengths in their attempts to rekindle Atlantis society. Some of their more sacred traditions, which included embedded magic (notably applied by practitioners of authentic Druidism and, hence, the elites’ interest in attending the mystery schools), predate known civilisation.

It could be argued that the whole concept of monachal divinity was ushered in by Atlantis. Accoutrements include the royal sceptre, which authentic versions are magic healing wands doubling as laser weapon. Bona fide royal orbs are holographic truth generators. A king’s crown bestowed the wearer with supernatural powers. Gnostics (visually expressed in the culture of Babylonian pharaohs) tried to approximate traditions as closely as possible. Below the Atlantis umbrella, society was guided by God who assumed formal presence in human form (i.e. this notion derived into “son of God”). As far as I can ascertain, Atlantis Gods were normally male, but on (or inside) other worlds, females preside over divinity. Per alien custom, these strange Goddesses are usually escorted by what we would call “prince consorts” (heirs or court champions’ suffice). Perhaps this is why some detailed truthful accounts tabled in ancient legends come across as ludicrously farcical.  We humans know only the human way. Therefore, non-human cultures are destined to either shock the system or captivate imagination.

In the interest of clarity, Gnostic-Jewish belief supposed the messianic priest-king (Christ) was the blessed divine embodiment of the people and that is why Jesus is euphemised as the Son of God. Even so many [differing and sometimes contradictory] messages can be delivered by a single fragment of text. Researchers should assure themselves a purist’s Messiah’s wisdom would put Solomon’s childish antics in their place. Ridiculous emphasis on the Pharisees’ salute to valid laws has ruined any chance of divine virtue governing man. Old Testament sermons dictate a path to enlightenment so rigid, any traveller is guaranteed crippled from the off. That is the reason paradoxes are so plentiful, “issues” seem to loom every few verses. Per these auspices, how could religious traditions be anything other than viscerally dishonest? My heart goes out to Italy’s La Befana . That bonny witch on a broomstick does more for Italian children than any pompous pope could dream.

Prophecy, prediction and consensus view – preconditioning for spirited souls?

Traditionally I have released themed articles in time for Christmas and New Year’s here. Though I broke from full time work mid-December, sadly all literary efforts ended up needing to be devoted to a wordy masterpiece that was eventually published on 3rd January at another of my websites. Next day, I began work on this entry with intensity. Prior to putting pen to paper (as it were) again, I had checked my “in progress or to be written” open correspondence file and stumbled upon a dusty old archive. Back then (2014), I was still vaguely attached to certain pioneer movements who systematically work through “conspiracy theories”. In that capacity efforts were partly devoted to upturning stones and exploding myths with ambition towards revealing the best approximations of pure truth hidden in a volatile ocean of misconceptions. The title of the original manuscript (that was used as the inspiration for this essay) was “Prophesies, Predictions and Preconditioning”. Controversially minimal, rather aptly only one note was attached to the file.

US Agency for International Development – “population reduction” Program Director, Reimart Ravenholt, reputedly aimed to sterilise one quarter of the world’s women (1977) just before the introduction of AIDS

We have all been exposed in some way to the excesses of establishment fuelled negativity generated towards conspiracy theories, reflecting “theorists” and the “horrors” of an open unregulated internet. Needless to say, ironical official government theories and parallel conspiracies are often largely true, but also divisively true.  I’ll contend stories that go the other direction invariably promote outright lies. How did Hitler put it?

If you are going to tell a lie, make sure it is a big one. Tell it over and over until everyone has no choice but to believe it.”

The real scandal, therefore, is found in the wide reliance on best-of-breeds “obtuse reasoning”. By example, Imagine you see before you a picture of some sort of idyllic scene beneath an airy bright blue sky. Location is unimportant. Out of view by several kilometres and completely omitted from the picture is a topology that would be described very differently. This “slant” image per my example comprises of several giant industrial chimney stacks that continuously and voluminously belch hideous gaseous plumes into the heavens. The effect promotes the unruly build-up of flailing, filthy black smog whose pungent foulness seems to permanently stain the clouds. All this chaos is out-of-view on our imaginary idyllic canvass, but, given a wider picture, conspiracies might focus on the negative in isolation “for impact”. The political arena (which absolutely underscores the establishment heart) champions identical rose tinted duplicity as there are no or next to no dissenting voices prepared to vocalise beyond standardised obtuse reasoning mandates (i.e. such as choosing to ignore industrial waste, in my example) and that is where the major issue lies for governments (and those that call governments to account) of the world in general.

Significant changes to my original (2014) conceptual title were made with the additions “consensus view” and, I must say rather ambiguous, “spirited souls”. Consensus view somewhat echoes another archived “to be written” memo, contritely titled “Attitude”. One note and single line “a bad attitude is good” confidently anticipates intentions, which, of course, clearly subliminally emphasises the power objective belying propagandas. Even so there is a correlation I haven’t discussed yet. Consensus view directly impacts obtuse reasoning. In fact, so much so, it beckons the hard to confirm question; did obtuse reasoning pre-empt consensus view or was it the other way round? This is, I might add, a question committed conspiracy theorists invariably fail to address and one of the pivotal arguments I use against most so-called “alternative” views.

I note just about all views either respond to relative ignorance or general superstition (deliberate or otherwise). Others will parasite off different consensuses whose varied appraisals of content boils down to the same equally acrid mulch that lends favour to official decorum. In addition to the syndrome, I have also observed that if one “camp” says “yes”, the alternative instinctively emphatically responds “no”. Considering this “us” versus “them” dichotomy, it seems entirely plausible for me to at least “determine” that a sole basic planner might be scripting an “ongoing without end” (mock) contest. Currently this is fought between “that which is official” (good) and “the antipathy towards anything official” (evil). Doubtlessly my theoretical planners’ will (desire) would be (perhaps posthumously) advanced by pyramidal structures in precisely the same manner (and possible extension of) the “good government” versus “evil anarchist” visceral war that has been expressed through the ages.

Speaking of good and evil, discussions about spirit and soul can lead to equally emotive bipartisan debates. It seems that which isn’t solid, under terms of atheism, grants indefinite license to create all manners of bullshit. Though outpourings about the immaterial might generate “fashionable” truths on occasion, because everything in that domain is perceived to be unprovable, the nicest speaker may as well seek an appreciative audience. In other words, for affairs that transcend physicality, truth is superfluous.  For example many believe the current pope “must” know something about God because he is head of the Catholic Church. In this context, whenever the pope makes a grotesque revelation about the paranormal (which includes everything spiritual) it must be true to believers. Conversely, per identical obtuse reasoning, anything that contradicts, defies or invalidates the pope’s “truths” are unquestionably (the equivalent of) revisionist. Conversely, the lone agent of prohibition blocking any pope’s charismatic attempts to “pioneer new divinities” is tradition. Traditionalism acts as guide, juror and potential censor. To make matters worse, most religions’ customs and cultures have become so bloated there is near zero opportunity for fundamental or symptomatic evolutionary change.

It should hardly surprise, given that background, my occasional verbal intercourse incidents with the “very religious” over the years has produced little more than persistent reactions against unresolvable lop sided circular arguments. Prognosis of opinions, in terms of spirit and soul from the philosophical standpoint, make entertaining review. For my research, by example, the average very religious person will only identify superficial differences between spirit and soul and, when challenged, will consciously demonstrate an overall inability to draw on formal assessable basis to separate the two. Quintessentially and rather conclusively, matters to do with God to them (the overly religious) are definitely not meant to be understood.  Arguably, the syndrome might well be appraised a symptom of feeble misappropriation of the concept glibly termed “blind faith” (comprehended best when paraphrased “blind ignorance for ignorant people”). Of course the problem with calculated blind denial of truth is eventually gulfs of misunderstanding form basis for decision making. Predictably consequential judgements invariably have cause to become so riddled with error; choices of the poorest quality can be exalted as “good practice” (sic). It could be said, cultures that cover up social ignorance make fodders for war.

Though the path to enlightenment is the antipathy of indoctrination, the permanently blind or visually impaired never see colour. The same can be said of those sighted whose deliberate misappropriation of ability is designated to spurn competent recollection of inherent truths. Even so, I do occasionally like to tease intellectual lepers in the spirit of fun. Most recently I have been bestowed with a power of existential knowledge that is so expansive, my “armour chest” (so to speak) is as big as Pandora’s Box, but (and contrary to that which is rational) this was not always the case. Tedium of past pointless cogitations can be no more praise God and that assures my altercations with dogmatism are blissfully short and absurdly sweet. Direct discussions of this type have included musings on matters spiritual, I recall. In that capacity, most unmoved “believers” would focus on the intolerable importance of a mythical unknown “Saviour”, whose sole identifiable miracle was to become posthumously “known” by that consequence. Their reasoning, if I dare call it that, proposes an angelic domino effect that replicates His “appearance” to feverishly ignorant folks who, once bitten by this deistic virus, become insanely obsessed with “succumbing” to all associated infectious dogmas no matter how spurious. I have, consequentially, needed to learn to agitate, shimmy and side-step their rebuttals at light speed. Nothing is worse than becoming bogged down with aimless nihilism (yes, wilful procrastination is an abject form of nihilism). No fraudulent messiah will cover up that fact.

Hit ‘em hard and hit ‘em quick is my way. Tried and tested many, many times, the best attack strategy against religious fanatics is to haggle for the promotion of sincere spirituality whilst warding off the fake stuff of fluff and fantasy. Always ask direct questions of the type “what is a soul?Never request, only demand answers. Even so, it is wise to cast some background before diving straight in with the hard questions. These guys (the terminally religious) are experts at dilly-dallying. Without clear defining lines, you are only guaranteed to generate countering verbal diarrhoea. The step approach seems to work best. That first step towards (and let’s harness the mission here) inducing another’s demystification is what I fondly term “bursting the bubble”. The smartest and easiest way to lampoon aimlessness is by the removal of all distracting debris. Religious folks fear authenticity’s values (sincere truth is symptomatically gnarled) as though it was the devil in making himself, so if any vassal has the fortitude to impress any kind of picture at all; it is bound to present “foggilyat best. Thus, step one towards demystification has to be the “total removal of existence”. That’s the removal of everything and not merely convenient bits that “obstruct” wider considerations.

It’s funny but the “very religious” (particularly Christians) are not “very” bright (light, logos, logic, intelligence) and not at all spiritual (creative). This is best highlighted by the commonest answer to my rhetorical question (and primary step towards disillusionment) “what’s left after a freak disappearance of everything?” Standard feedback to this is the antiphon “nothing”. Ok, I usually paraphrase the question differently. I usually ask, “If God removed everything you know to be “existence” in an instant, what would be left?” Responses are mostly the same. Occasionally a smart ass retorts, “Well, [my] God wouldn’t do that.” Look, I know blasphemy was one of the great Pharisaic deceptions that has somehow become common doctrine now (i.e. Moses’ “Commandments”), but telling God what “He” can or cannot do, well I think that is taking the biscuit. The objection can be fairly easily dispelled anyway. Maybe try “use your imagination, if you’ve got one” for starters. I admit I did have one really stubborn guy once who dug his heels in so deep, it seemed like nothing would move that rock. Eventually I came up with the master stroke. “Imagine, as a test, which was associated with the Day of Judgement, God removed existence – temporarily. I can’t say why, because we both know He is allowed to work in mysterious ways”, I beamed. Finally he accepted the “mysterious ways” paradox.

So, the predominant answer to ending existence was there was nothing left. Of course, this pre-empts potentially hilarious responding high jinx but you need to be there to appreciate them.  Watch the Christian squirm when you accuse him of being (…drum roll) “an atheist”. Well, this is true! A conventional atheist “believes” there is nothing beyond material existence. Be it there is much they (non-believers) cannot explain and many “miracles” (far more miraculous than the Saviour could have ever concocted) coincided with “Big Bang”, those adepts-in-waiting with suitably “muted vision” will easily succumb to fantasy; Christians included it seems. But hard line worshippers are resilient if nothing else. They recover from knocks in poor taste quickly. My uncompromising stick-in-the-mud partner also predictably fell into the “nothing” trap moments after expressing “absolute devotion” to God. Don’t you see the irony? He didn’t, but I can. Anyway, with regards supposedly devout Christians, I learnt nothing can also be something, because after existence vanished at the drop of a hat (and a lot of head scratching), “the void” (per se) unexplainably and conveniently can transform into “heaven” depending on circumstances (which God only knows). Heaven, according to these boneheads, is a place of bliss, where no malice is possible. Complimenting that warped tradition, it also happens to be a place of pure goodness that exclusively only “lets in” Christians. Avowed to avenge the Jews (canned laughter), I shall now attempt to demonstrate how to turn conceptual heaven into hell “for dummies”.

Hell, heck, damnation, call it what you will, causes Christians awkward problems. It is a “known of” place that invariably deflects consideration, less chaotic focus. Perhaps we see evidence of symptomatic conditioning here. The Baptist championed ancient proverb “Hear no evil, speak no evil, do no evil” humbles Hades, Beelzebub (or Yaldebroath or Adam incidentally) and everything from the dark side to obsoleteness. Given my slapstick up to this point, a smidgen more jollity surely wouldn’t harm? Let’s face it, to valiantly deflate the Christian’s “heaven” the intellectual champion simply has to state the obvious. Therefore, next supplementary question (and step two of this mission towards demystification) has to be “what about heck?” Now “evil people and non-Christians” must go somewhere post “expiry”, right? And that ponderable pitches our devout enthusiasts somewhere between an intellectual rock and a hard place.

They all know there is “limited space” in purgatory. Considering that even Jesus recognised and apparently mentioned hell several times (albeit periodically paraphrased it as the “outer darkness where beasts wail and gnash their teeth”), the paradox cannot be “wished away” even by the puniest of minds or, rather, not at least in serious discussions with spiritually “highbrow” strangers. Every Christian I have interviewed has reluctantly contended that hell not only “exists”, but resides in a no man’s land that is beyond existence, To make matters worse, due to the absence of time/space, it has to be right on the doorstep of heaven. That leaves but one option to save the average Christian libido. Conceptualisations of the scripts I am sure vary in personality, but, suffice to say, to put reasoning “in a nutshell”, for the zealous existence is the proverbial “wall” that separates heaven and hell. Ironically, this is closer to the truth than the feeble minded might imagine.

Still, when it comes to nether regions, the Christian’s imagination is honed to peak optimisation. Everyone (to degrees) tries to impress what they want to be (true) over what is, but some manage to proffer vanity to its limit. Apparently a moat with crocs teaming to the brim may be conveniently positioned between heaven and heck in order to split oblivion into two sacred but by no means related domains. That, believe it or not, was a genuine piece of feedback I had received in response to the heaven/hell dilemma. I don’t know why I didn’t see it before. Ok, I am aware the Victorian era British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli is attributed as saying, “sarcasm is the lowest form of wit”, but an occasional facetious bite does enhance pantomime. And these hard line Christians would make me chuckle on a regular basis, was it not for the fact the issues exposed are the very same ones God wants us to fix. Segregated heavens caused the problem with existence in the first place, amply explained by the Gnostics (those interested in knowing more would do well to start with John’s Apochryphon in the Hag Hammadi scrolls). “Branding” people evil is a form of evil. We only have to look to the sage Krishna who eloquently identified, “[True] spirituality brings to freedom, so forces of evil paralyse (censor and destroy)”.

Putting Christians and other raging fanatics to one side, if I could summarise everyone’s honest attitude towards most others (and particularly strangers), sentiment as dialogue would be expressed in the following way:

I say “fuck you” (to everyone that knows something I don’t know).

(When I presume to know everything), I say “fuck you” too.”

It is high time humanity moved off the perilous “look after number one” course. It’s killing you – literally. All wars are sold on the look after number one excuse. “One”, in this instance, is the “great group”, albeit sometimes the great group can delineate into strata subgroups within groups. Look how Japanese Americans were marginalised throughout US involvement in the Second Word War. Propagandists maintain spin cycles that presume everyone can and will be conditioned with depressing consistency. To the propagandist a human being is a wilful slave, so marketing programs are designed to drive and capture recruits. Per that model, the underscored narrative line must never falter. Paradoxes, contradictions and anomalies are verboten, Results speak for themselves. These illustrious tailors have been remarkably successful in their quest. It seems as though there is an endless supply of soldiers ready to apply relish to squandering their own lives for absurdity. Worse still, licensed murderers may kill with impunity.

We now know when it comes to matters of spirit and soul, hard line Christians are weak on explanations to say the least. Indeed, to them separation of “roles” usually proves to be more paradoxical even than the physical placement of heaven and hell. Though I’ve been highlighting devout Christians up to now, no single person I have ever corresponded with has comprehensively been able to demonstrate correct visualisation of the soul/spirit “value base”. Many, in fact just about all, graft spiritual qualities onto souls. Maybe, and though rarely specifically identified as such, the soul is deemed to have some association with (if not also made of) light. God’s true purpose behind the deliberate placement of spirit and soul is about as alien as the average extra-terrestrial (and I am referring to the ones that remain permanently unknown here).

In fairness, identifying the soul, in particular, can be pretty tricky. When you don’t know what to look for, cohesive apperception becomes exponentially more challenging. For instance, the sincere atheist would deny the soul as it is immaterial. My own book The Beauty of Existence Decoded attempts to expose the chassis that tenures the bare bones of reality. In doing so, I tend to complicate things for perception. I introduce conflicting truths.  Top down view is far simpler and easier to understand, but that visualisation (even when flawlessly presented) doesn’t come to grips with “processes”. How is the result of a soccer match worth anything if the actual game is unavailable for scrutiny? Also, contrary to popular “belief”, there is no “group” or “cosmic” mind mimicking divine government (beyond the Tamarian, from which “Adam” or Yaldebroath was a consequence). Christ’s Consciousness (as is embraced by the Catholic Church) is Sephardic make-believe, nonsense, bullshit designed to enslave the gullible for the overall empowerment of those that control. Paranormal interventions, extra-terrestrial/dimensional influencers and noisome human charlatans routinely issue dogmatic propagandas tuned to deliver grades of indoctrination? Yes to all of those, but no to an effervescent meddling God. Then again, it should be noted The Prime Source (extra-terrestrial signature signifying the Almighty God) does “mess with” all DNA, but that’s moving along a tangent best explored another time.

For now, I will try and précis the “lite” versions of spirit and soul in the simplest of terms. Presuming there isn’t a transcendental “presiding” ultra-group that contravenes causal oversight (which there isn’t by the way, unless we factor in the Tamarian, which travels all the up the astral states), the spirit is “light” and the soul is “darkness”. Yes, it is as simple as that. The spirit and the soul are indelible partners of the Buddhist concept Yin Yang. Of course, that motivates distinct moral dilemmas. Born again Christians have been indoctrinated into prostrating before dogmatic evil heralds from darkness and “light vanquishes all evil” (which when correctly translated actually means wisdom conquers doubt). Considered reasoning behind their beliefs are “normally” obtuse, generally speaking, minds are notably possessed in this specific instance. Dangerous, divisive traditional views impede valid interpretations. For example, given the knowledge the soul is darkness; does that mean it should be denied? Emphatically no, for conceptual evil heralding from darkness is one of the almighty religious deceits. Promoted near universally the malice is aimed squarely at corrupting the identity of the essence of humanity (collectively bound by the Tamarian under the framework of “Adam” of course). Origins of the true fabrication of evil are all but forgotten. We need to hark back to the creation of the material universe to appreciate precise logic behind myths. Can I say “once upon a time”? Anyway, an incredibly long time ago there was an age when (as the Gnostics and Babylonians put it) “God slumbered”, but then a schism in bliss (God’s collective uniform state) caused the fractal development of aeons (distinct traits of God) before they were able to manifest. One, who is fondly remembered as “Sophia” (or wisdom) decided to drive manifestation beyond bliss. Consequentially holistic existence came into being on her (his) terms. I shall now attempt to describe the process.

At this time, before there was linear time, there was nothing but nothing. And from nothing Sophia (who, though the Gnostics termed as “female”, embraced male spiritual qualities with feminine care) caused an imperceptible rip that had the potential to become a gateway to something. The gateway did manifest and later became known as “Satan” (which the most ancient ones called “blessed”). Modern astrologers would correctly identify it as a star. Thus, strictly speaking, Satan was first known as the “Blessed Star”. Only long after when Satan was a “distant memory” did negative aspersions attempt to distort truth. So much so, the fantasy that is popularised today (and which may only be regarded as a vile anathema to truth) transcended due diligence to become “common doctrine”. Without Satan’s gateway existence could not have manifest for there was no light then. Upon Sophia’s divine directive, the heavens were instantaneously created and segregated by seven spherical divides which would later become generally known as the heavenly states (each representing the fundamental expressive traits of God). Per her (his) plan, existence equated to and was astral purity.

Yet, as the “Holy Spirit” (created by the aeons to be their corporeal prophet and arbiter) predicted, God did not appreciate His slumber with the others detached. The rest, the dark, needed to join the light for they felt excluded. However, Satan’s gateway was only commissioned to release light. Potently inventive, in order to join the brethren, darkness reconfigured as forms of light (atomic pulse) and this confused the giant star. Still, Satan remained resilient to the cause. He kept the dark (but not hostile) forces at bay for as long as he was able, but more and more joined the throngs to create overwhelming pressure. Eventually nothing (even light) could access the vent or pass the gateway. It was thoroughly blocked. But the build-up kept building and building and the pressure mounted and mounted. Something had to “give” and eventually in one all mighty “blow”, dark matter overwhelmed the Blessed Star’s magnetic field (which, ironically, without dark matter, would never have been) and powered into existence. From that moment onwards reality (per Sophia’s “plan”) changed forever (as all “stars” have the same basic redundancy flaw). The material plane was born and this, in its entirety, is how the ancients’ originally defined “evil”. To them materialistic peoples (or “materialists”) were the roots of all evil. Spiritual, astral, faith-driven bodies preceded goodness.

Observance of modern day Satanism is the evolution of mumbo jumbo (begun perhaps by 1800’s industrialists) output under the spurious auspices of [secret] esoteric societies. These “energy portals” (as the Draco call them) were manipulated by the Sephardim and other external entities when society members attempted to contact the “other world” (usually by séance).  Hitler’s association with the German Thule Movement is widely publicised. Ancients taught that Satan, in the capacity of Blessed Star, had been conquered by matter and, thus, forces aligned with matter were the “evil” that prohibited pure (spiritual) existence. There is no greater materialistic soul than a sceptical industrialist, so it was in the best interest of principled commerce (beginning long before biblical times) to deliberately craft the Satan deception (obscuring the truth for “prosperity’s sake”). It was the materialists that the ancient ones warned us (the spiritual) of. Oversimplifying truth in misleading ways, usurpers (Pharisees), discombobulated the ancients’ wisdom into new terms per their gross distortion. Corresponding with that trickery, Satan’s gate now deliberately let in “evil” (under those terms, how on Earth does satanic equate to “wrong doing” anyway?) which is an absolute whopping great lie.

Regardless of the tarnished fact, matter is not going to “pop out of existence” (Satan’s volcanic atomic eruption misconstrued as “Big Bang” is another industrialist backed outright con. Details of which can be found in my book). Because of their basic (but unavoidable) design flaws, all stars will vent dark matter at the end of their useful cycles. Derelicts are posthumously known as “black holes” (even Israel’s champion Stephen Hawking has had to grudgingly admit that vanquished stars spew “something” into the cosmos). Interestingly, there were no souls prior to the introduction of dark matter. That makes them a phenomenon intrinsically connected with the manifestation of existence (adrift of spirituality). Drawing from my The Beauty of Existence Decoded, according to science the average sized [human] body has around 5 x 10 to the power 27 souls. Well, actually, science doesn’t mention souls at all, but if it understood the transcendental purpose atoms play in respect to life, that would become the formal science assessment.

I referenced Charles Hall’s photon theory once before. Hall extrapolates Albert Einstein’s “missing fields” and this stresses how poorly materialism conceptualises the quantum layer. Junk science may attempt to satirically ridicule DNA, but the real farce is DNA can only be found in black light, whose mechanics draw out relative gibberish from traditional physicists. If only they had studied at Atlantis and learnt of the significance of the Tamarian. Nuclear tyrant Oppenheimer’s psychotic ignorance (domino effect collapsing all matter) does not excuse him. Even so, and though I haven’t cited the paper, I am led to believe the Australian Chris Illert has been able to prove Theosophical “opinions” on the structure of atoms reflecting information channelled via séance at the turn of last century by conventional means. Alleged extra-terrestrial visitors who resided in Spain in the 1950’s have also presented a variation of the same basic outline. It is one I favour as it is the easiest to understand (unlike the unnecessarily convoluted clap trap that coordinates supposedly cutting edge mainstream theories that “shape” the endless “new discoveries” churned out of the Hadron Collider and other sensational “props”). Unworldly “Ummos” informed us that atoms have three “light phases” working in unison – the upper, lower and middle frequencies. Ancient Atlantis sages have been attributed as having the ability to manipulate these pulses with their minds only. They apparently did this well enough to alter signal properties. Their great alchemists could turn anything into gold with no need of mundane chemicals or flasks.

The Atlanteans knew that each atom is a miniscule piece of subspace real estate. In addition, according to their Tamarian philosophy, all atoms (the group) can be perceived as an expanding, but permanently interconnected mesh. I plan to expand on this illumination in the future and have already headlined a blank manuscript. “Does the Draconians’ False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?” that will likely find a place at my other website that focuses on the paranormal. Returning to ordinary matters, mainstream quantum mechanics generally (and erroneously) evaluates the symptomatic effects elevated by force fields aimed at “containing” each centrifugal nucleus. In this capacity aroms generate the pulse or “echo” of holographic solidity which (amongst others things) emphasises mass (or magnetism). Specifically tuned to our dimension, the mechanism logically has no influence on other density fields “out of frequency range”. Were our pedestrian sciences to become acutely coherent on the subject (which is an unlikely prospect, given “industrial” materialism mandate), “frequency catalyser” models (functionality extra-terrestrial Zeta Grey Beings have been trying to raise awareness of via “crop circle” diagrams) might be best applied at the conceptualisation stages.

In fairness (and credit where credit’s due) string and super string theory do have the potential to decode the atom, but not on current course. As Suzy Hanson identified (details are unspecific) in her book The Dual Soul Connection, [Zeta, though she doesn’t specifically identify the fact] Grey Beings were able to (somehow and much to the bafflement of astrophysicist Rudy Schild) “switch off” an atom’s energy field (which also explains how their partner “Mantis Beings” are able to travel through the eye of a particle, by reputation). Atomic frequency harnesses all dimensions and contains all time, so these little babies are important to those that understand them. I pose the question (although I don’t formally supply answers) as to whether “time lords” could travel both ways once access to the ultimate dimension (Ummos called number ten) was available without restriction. Incidentally, I believe the Ummos were referring ten fundamental “states” of existence, which included the seven heavenly spheres. To confuse matters, these are routinely broken up into dimensions, densities and eras.

Switched on readers at this point (doubtlessly after some bafflement) might have encouraged sufficient resolve to pique a burning request of me. If “atoms” deliver souls, then does that mean inanimate objects, such as rocks [and stuff], have souls too? My goodness, my audience is on the ball today. That is an excellent and most perceptive question but I’m pleased to say the answer is “yes”. However I need to also qualify that souls contained in “rocks and stuff” are clinically different (dissimilar frequency “keys”) to life souls. Indeed, as a soul travels up the astral ladder partnering with spirituality, complimenting developmental quantities are laterally progressive. Readers with genius ambition would surely ask why [the need for all the subterfuge]? The answer to that is as plain as it is Earth shattering. In effect God “broke” after the initial creation of heavenly existence (long before material existence existed). Astral soul progress is part of the healing process, which, according to the Aryan Vedas, will take in the order of 311 trillion of our years to “complete” (when existence will revert to bliss?). Therefore, my apologies to charged crusaders, but you don’t conquer Rome in a day.

The soul is simple and complex. As I mentioned before, the most uniform way of “representing” it is as darkness, but that won’t mean too much to those that haven’t come to terms with the powerful structure of darkness. Identical to light, darkness is a hierarchy and atoms account for the very lowest level. In fact there is even a black spectrum which mirrors light in reverse. If I take the human body as an example, we are made of particles which collectivise to build our cell structures. Cells join to form into organs and other components. Some of these amass to collaborate into value added networks, such as the nervous system. But in supreme control of the body is a very special “high level” attribute, known simply as “the mind”. Correspondingly, we can argue our bodies are actually “pyramidal structures” below it.

Soul “categorisation” also identifies well with parts (and their roles) of the human body, but complexes are not matched. It is important to acknowledge the “soul” is not an individual but, rather, the collaboration of “many”. Every soul motivated decision is the result of a reaction (to be deciphered as original thought) that is backed by a “chorus”. Whether inanimate or animate, individual things that are the many parts that make up the material plane are all individually composed of huge numbers of atoms. There are no exceptions to that rule at the lowest level (and that is the reason material existence is very inflexible when benchmarked against the astral). Were all atoms to be given pivotal political decision making roles, “logical chaos” would reign. Once again, as is the case with components of the human body, individual atoms join to create “guilds”. These, in turn, establish “networks”, up and up until only a handful of respondents actually voice “the obvious” (utopian coordination of harmonic resonance). This small managerial posse (which mimics the indecisiveness of every stable mind) is the best approximation of something that might “fit” the distorted tradition (an anathema) humans identify as “soul”. It is a construct, of course, because that is all it can be.

To continue with any authority, simplicity is no longer plausible in treatment of this subject matter. The dedicated and intellectually superior are advised to read on. Others may leave to make tea, feed the pig or entertain lighter but meaningful preoccupations. So, without further ado, continuation now becomes much more complex as there are other aspects to this conundrum that either identify with or are regularly “confused as” the soul. For instance, what are the differences between the conscious, subconscious (or unconscious) and the super conscious in respect to the above? Is the “soul” an integral part of each or does it branch in order to satisfy differing needs/perspectives of severed states or apportions? Classically, those devoutly religious magically reconstruct the higher self as a proto-soul. Moreover (emphasising the “ego” is profoundly misunderstood too) the higher self is most commonly transformed (a construct) into something that might equate to the (perceived as) best bits of the collective egotistic wisdom of popular “TV personalities” (or akin “role model” devices), so it isn’t really the higher self at all. Thus, routine deduction suggests each proto-soul has to be a crafty caricature of the true higher self (which is not formally recognised as such) and this is a spectral aspect of the spirit. If the spirit is to be loosely classed as “graded astral compliance”, then the ego (consciousness) would represent the collective lowers states. In toto, the subconscious coordinates mid-range value expressions and the super conscious is the closest approximation to “heaven on Earth” for a living, terrestrial body.

If only convergence was that simple. You see the ego is actually a figment which is comprised of flawless light body, “hard” physical body and various supplementary external components (superficially attached). Ego is a “bundle”. It is a conscious spirited material (soul) cooperative. The ego is often misconstrued as arrogance. It is not arrogance per se, although obstinate behaviour would be very representative of selfish nature and self is the epitome of ego. Like the soul, the self is a multi-faceted product. No one thing is particularly reflected, but overall a noteworthy identity (classically termed as “the personality”) presides over the directive life force (coordinating work towards common interests of the parts). Dramatic sustained personality changes (commonly after trauma) signify swaps of ego ownership. Souls are hierarchically stronger as they are aloof (even though a soul’s lateral development directly corresponds with the ego’s life course). It may only be a figment of time, but the ego is so highly regarded (by The Prime Source), after the power source (spirit) decides it is ready to detach from the body (the stage that is commonly known as “death”) a complete record is preserved for prosperity. Each “record” lives on in void format. The Babylonians called these “shadows”. Shadows are the limbo stages between incarnations. They notably factor when unforeseen circumstances lead to unprepared deaths.

The way a life is preserved directly corresponds with how “time” is structured and works (hence the importance of atomic particles). Linear perception only succumbs to the illusion of causal reality (note: this should not to be compared against erroneous “so-called” causality). Similar to the way a computer’s hard drive functions, the script permitting time sits constantly in the present (which is actually past, present and future combined). Via plotted coordinates, the same script resource can be used (over and over) in an infinite number of [different] ways, satisfying an infinite number of platforms and an infinite number of causalities (timelines). In the case of newly created shadows, pre-set routes double as record of old lives and blueprint for new lives. Thus, each shadow attempts to identically re-enact old lives (albeit with the objective of fixing issues or “doing it better next time round”). Naturally external parameters are invariable so different or heavily adjusted, each “new life” would not even vaguely compare to ones prior. Figurative “déjà vu” is the commonest parallel lives memory symptom. Another effect which confirms a shadow’s numerous incarnate “run throughs” is cumulative “instinct”. Contrary to popular belief, Instinct does not come naturally. It is the evolutionary response of many consecutive lives imprinted on hierarchical DNA.

For new lives to have any hope of matching the prior course, all (or the majority of) original connections would have to be in place. To a degree this is so, but definition will not favour the ardent egotistical materialist. Accountants would say all the pieces were actually in the wrong places, mixed up and “functionally defunct” (compared with originals). Yet, the truth is all the parts were in the precise places they needed to be for the new life to function optimally, even when the user’s survival duration was less than a minute. Existence accommodates limitless numbers of lives for innumerable purposes. Plausibly safe routes are present for those that choose to avail them. The quality of the stage we call death determines the speed of carnal transition. Peaceful deaths, such as “still birth”, would usually promote back-to-back lives (or instant reincarnation, though transference does not necessarily observe traditional linear definition). Traumatic or unfulfilled ends will naturally prolong transition. Certain individuals respond so badly to circumstances it is impossible to recirculate them. I hope the war machine feels warm about its unconscionable tyranny. How anyone can kill an unknown for the sake of “following orders” defies belief. But militant disrespect is not the only transgressor on that front. The deceitful “health” industry “helps” people die well before their time.

There are many different brands of “prophecy” and “prediction” aimed at courting the consensus view. Auspices such as conspiracy theories go some way to deflecting criticisms of mainstream inappropriateness, but balances that construe scales of political conduct are expansive. Of course political criticisms are almost always correct, but with such range much disagreeable dirt finds a way into the mainstream too, even if only for (as Jon Rappoport puts it) limited hangout. I have been particularly focusing on monstrous paedophilia in relation to these phenomena. Paedophilia itself is not “necessarily” monstrous, but maybe it is, depending on critical circumstances. What is undeniably evil about the theatricals that surround publicised [legally defined as] underage sex incidents is they reflect an accusatory court system that judges without being just.

The reason late Michael Jackson summonsed over a thousand (mostly perjuring) witnesses to defend him is he proved he was able to overwhelm the prosecution’s charge with counter accusations. To put things in perspective, a deceitful, lying Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) manipulated all mainstream Medias to conjure prejudice of the magnitude that they thought would be enough to “frame” their target, Michael Jackson. The net effect of this cooperative subterfuge appears to have been modelled on advice contained in Hitler’s Mein Kampf.  “He’s guilty as sin no question about it, [give him the chair]” (as monotonous strangled exclaims) was repeated over and over like some tortured, hapless proverb. Jackson, fortunately in this instance, was as bright as he was recalcitrant. His familiar lyrical warble ever so gently persuaded “I am innocent because I’m pure”, but people struggled to believe it as he was given so little air time and the mainstream had been running their “whacko Jacko” side campaign geared to presenting him as “a nutcase” all the while. Those that listened really carefully to Jackson couldn’t have helped but picking up a hint of “you conceited, dishonest assholes” in the subliminal. We all know our government sponsored agencies are “beyond external criticism” so his fate was doubtlessly meant to be a “fait accompli”.

My last article dealt with the dynamics of child abuse (sic), but did not explain how it was possible to manufacture perjury more or less universally. Newspapers so regularly jump the gun on judgemental statement, people have become obliviously desensitised to their deceitful practices. When hundreds and hundreds of unrelated headlines deliver the same basic corrupt message over and over (Hitler’s Mein Kampf comes to the surface again), a cultivation of truth-of-sorts is brought into being. Deceitful corruption transforms into truth because no one challenges the singular original message (which is established through its repetition). This is partly because newspapers (all referring to near identical sources) create the illusion – the public voice. Thousands of newspapers can’t “all” be wrong, surely? As there is invariably a solitary fire source for each aggressively billowing smoke stack, “thousands” of reports in different newspapers in reality boil down to one voice, one view, one replicated propaganda pitch. Whilst it may be possible to launch private paedophilia prosecutions, every case publicised by Medias thus far (to my knowledge) has demonstrated evidence of responses to claims of injustice by the public “guardian”. Therefore, specific Media sources for all publicised paedophile arrests are provided by the Department of Public Prosecution or law enforcement agents acting on its behalf.

Under conditions of aggregated sanity, this obvious collusive brainwashing exercise would have been sprung before the ink had barely dried on the first tabloid release. Let us consider the ramifications of collective gutless social cowardice. How many law enforcers arrest paedophiles with view to prosecution on suspicion of innocence?

Oh yes, we have to arrest a few innocents to prove “the [justice] system” is flawless

I was being sarcastic here because the reverse is true of course and it is far worse than that when “justice” is factored into the equation. To the law enforcer a “paedophile” is only “allegedprior to arrest. Once arrested, every suspect (sic) may as well plead guilty. The conspiracy here is newspapers only release the “view” [which I’m sure would equate to perjury in the “private sector”, by the way] of arbitrarily biased prosecutors and that almost always guarantees a win at court. It is no wonder the core message (in press releases) might as well read, “Why waste time and money on this trial?” Aside from the time poor reluctantly underpaid (why aren’t they allowed to claim lawyers or barristers’ rates?) jurors debacle, this fashion definitely looks back to those memorable “kangaroo courts” of the nineteenth century. Perhaps the plan is to ultimately bring back torture and confessions signed in blood.

Headlines are everywhere and these are designed to precipitate judgemental values that permeate the public mind.

I [personally] don’t know that guy but he’s “obviously” guilty because my newspapers/TV tell me so.

Even close family members of an “accused” can be swayed into “believing” just as easily as the rest. He must have led a double life is the usual “excuse” granted. The scandal merchants have any and all melodramatic outcomes covered. Therefore when law enforcement, building “the case”, wants to beef up “witness” (sic) numbers, they have actually even managed to convince an accused’s own brother or sister to testify negatively with nothing more than accusatory hearsay providing “basis” for statements. Did Michael Jackson’s sister actually witness the star engaging in sex acts with minors? Of course she didn’t. She fell for all that mass Media bullshit after being egged on by the Department of Public Prosecution.

Where there’s smoke there must be fire, eh?

Correct, the fire is your friendly, manipulatively lying, smarmy, self-opinionated law enforcement agency and its vile, uncompromisingly prejudicial public prosecution attack dog.

In Western nations, such as Australia, the Catholic Church is at the forefront of paedophilia allegations (remembering “allegation” is always mysteriously transformed into “certain guilt” of course). Records of incidents with forlorn priests are so voluminous; I am surprised Medias have managed to keep up with the pace. It may surprise Australians (in particular) all religions (well, except for a noteworthy Jewish “cult group” I shall focus on shortly) have been targeted, including Buddhism (to the Dalai Lama’s embarrassment). The real reasons for this scandalous deception may seem bizarrely conspiratorial but, against the background I present, not entirely farfetched. Whatever current opinions reign, duty to justice dictates religious cultures need to be reviewed from dual perspectives in light of mass Media stoking before any final judgements are made. The balanced investigator cannot rule out the magnetic effect of propagandas which has been proven so effective, over and over.

Whereas there is almost always no actual “evidence” supporting paedophile allegations and convictions are usually motivated by circumstantial witness “testimony” (“confession” or slanderous perjury?), adults with a genuine interest in “child sex” might plausibly seek likeminded friends. Where to “find” likeminded friends is the greatest challenge for any would-be paedophile, I would imagine. Thinking carefully along these lines, I did come up with some basis that might (and only “might”) give credence to devilish religious conspiracies of this genre. Though by conventional auspices serious contemplations would likely be too far adrift of cultural reason to disaffect “greater good” syndromes, public hysteria has shown itself to be both open to and humbled by extremely shallow arguments supporting the most unlikely of cabal concepts. For instance, if the researcher is willing to concede that rogue partnerships have been brokered with view to persuading mutual goals; with or without illicit connections, could these same like-minded associations be able to arrange prohibited liaisons?

Whether the “opinion” on the answer to that critical question is “yes” or “no”, religious institutions are viscerally bound to apply a duty of care to their congregations as each supposedly “acts for God” (conceptual greater good). Therefore the reality is that the church and other houses of worship are proved profoundly derelict of duty if just one allegation against them “takes hold”.

Under terms of worship, how is it possible for God “to err”?

The current state of affairs suggests administrative pressure for all religions is now in damage control aggravated by highly visible and seemed ceaseless spiteful propaganda barbs (that have prepared the floods of universally known past allegations of guilt). Therefore, would not the slightest rumour of paedophilia trigger internal raucous alarms within any spiritual organisation, even ones that are only borderline “religious”?

After hysterics dressed in the familiar mask of deceitful ignorance, known or faceless accusers, “guilty” accused and alleged victim(s) would come out of the woodwork, sometimes years after the fact (anything to ward off clarity), what would be bound to happen next?

Ultimately, any “bad” cleric would be sold up the river, of course.

Up to a certain point it would be in the best interest of the organisation under scrutiny to deal with everything internally in order to deflect negative publicity. However, when avalanches of complaints reach such frequencies as to become common public knowledge, reputation has already been long squandered. Under those special circumstances, “tarnished” institutions would have little to gain beyond doing everything in their power to suppress (which usually means eject without forethought) “bad eggs”. Indeed, by acting quickly in highlighting detractors, cutting red tape to ensure the expelling of alleged paedophiles is painless; some kudos might be given by the public at large. Press releases reporting that “order is not being interfered with and internal elitism has permitted routine justice” might actually be viewed as positive “PR” by targeted organisations. Any institution that complies would, at the very least, be seen to be acting in the “public interest” which, per manifestos, is also “in the interest of God”.

Let us say, for instance, there were rumours backing allegations, but nothing more. There were allegations without hard evidence. Could any religious institution in damage control ignore these and give an accused the “benefit of doubt”? It seems to me that in certain circumstances of shall we say “high security”; risk management significantly upgrades the chances of an accused’s presumed “guilt” pre-trial. How can the “certainly guilty” prove his innocence? How could the trial of a cleric sensationally rejected by his church be unbiasedly “fair”? Also people do lie, deceive and manipulate for a multitude of reasons. Fabrication of law enforcement evidence and biased judges is a popular theme used in police movies – the innocent man up against a corrupt machine. But what of those false claims of truth that were “believed” as though they were true?

How can fantasy that never was be “proven”?

Circumstances that did happen will hopefully leave a conspicuous evidence trail, but those that did not happen are guaranteed to leave no evidence trail. While beliefs are committed to duplicitous reasoning, fantasy is easy to upgrade and immortalise for it can neither be formally proven nor disproven. That is significantly why circumstantial evidence (evidence lacking hearsay such as reflective opinions) is used to formulate “basis” for verdict decision making to allow the promotion of fantasy (or something that did not happen) as reality (something that did happen). All of the “witnesses” at Michael Jackson’s “trial” offered circumstantial evidence (i.e. none offered hard evidence) whether acting for prosecution or defence.

I introduced “conspiracy theories” at the beginning of this article and now seems the right time to put that theme to the test. It has been noted (particularly in the alternative press) many times that where there are political conspiracies, the Jews are invariably never far away. Judaism, as with most other religions, is broken into (upwards of a hundred) different sects and this proffers the user base opportunities for considerable variance in doctrinal interpretations. Though invariably not “directly” concerning them, political conspiracies gravitate to favour Pharisee (a notable sect) involvement/implication when factoring in pre-emptive law making. Pharisaic tradition formats the script that makes all laws (certainly in “the West”) “viable”. These include horrendously unfair legislations that have been characterised to target religious practitioners of all persuasions in order to limit their involvement with (quite frankly) anything sexual (i.e. if the Pharisee adage “to lust after is to sin” is enough to permit unrequited draconian laws, presumably, as “God’s emissaries”, all fornicating priests are deemed to be “fair game” as potential targets).

Suffice to say, the Pharisees (and these guys are behind just about all those “prophesies” and “consensus” conventions “we” are obliged to follow) are subtly all over paedophilia. Paedophilia, of course, has a nasty habit of pissing off parents and making them “think” (sic) irrationally. It only needs a whiff of the word in family environments to fuse ugly breakouts of the poorest quality. Contemplate the power a “fringe religion” would hold over competitors if it could only harness inane populist ignorance. So following the track of general conspiracy theories and plausible revelations of outrageous duplicity in review of what mechanisms would be needed to be in place for effective infiltration of “enemies”, I considered whether this could be equally applied to the Pharisees, whether circumstantial allegations “in principle” might demonstrate limited credence against them as covert tyrannical ring leaders. Unlike hypotheticals monstrously resurrected to become “living satires” by our kangaroo courts, I make no prejudgement here.

Would it be possible, within the frame of this conceptualisation, for a Pharisee to pretend to be a Roman Catholic and win a diocese seat? Reviewing this consideration for a long while, I drew the unenviable conclusion, that it was not only possible but likely probable. Benjamin Disraeli affirmed that Jews deliberately married into aristocratic and royal families for “social position”. If a Pharisee can infiltrate a marriage, he can infiltrate a religion. In historic periods of persecution, high profile Jews have been recorded as having publically denounced their faith in favour of Roman Catholicism. Until Jesuit Martin Luther pinned his list of demands on the door of a chapel in Wittenberg, Germany in 1517, Catholicism’s “promissory penances” were very appealing to time poor Jewish merchants. Since the Nicolaitans’ (Pharisees) corruption sculpted what was to become new Gnosticism back in the fourth century, there has been bitter-sweet cooperation between the two faiths.

So, let us take the position that the Pharisees have infiltrated all religions, perhaps as part of their messianic “prison planet” (covert Zionism) strategy, what would they do once “in place”? Logic dictates they would try and influence how doctrines would be interpreted in order to found absolute bias towards their philosophies. How could this be executed? The answer is simple. Should various Pharisees be bestowed with clerical administrative roles devoted to scrutinising and assessing the philosophic worth of historic documents, then this would permit periodic “pushes” (perhaps aided by heavy bribes) gauged towards altering consensuses against traditional views and standards. Texts too outspoken for alteration that obstructed the “mission” might be deemed and argued as “spurious” (and thusly debatably unauthentic).

But what of outspoken individuals that won’t budge on “issues” that hinder the Pharisees’ operational synopsis?

How to dispel all those flies in the ointment with something that is guaranteed to work without “comeback”? It is worth noting here, in line with this “hypothetical”, logically all those religions the Pharisees have infiltrated are not friends collected in the spirit of fomenting mutual endeavours. They have all been deceived, defiled and, per identical reasoning, exist only to be tarnished (thou shalt not worship “false Gods”), as too (in some ways) are “rogue” (impure) sects of Judaism. For guarantees of no “comeback” against targeting mission obstructers there could never be any actual evidence. Everything would have to be fabricated (total bullshit) to assure opinions for were completely reliant on biased emotive circumstantial judgement. Perhaps “qualified” psychiatrists could validate repressed (i.e. non-existent) memories with the same sort of candor [used] when issuing prescriptive “medications” that induce psychosis. It would need false scandal after false scandal that instinctively “tweaked nerves”; some topic the public would be belligerent and stupid enough to believe in without reservation, something that might induce hysteria, if “generally” known. And there we have the hypothetical fire behind all the paedophilia scandals that afflict religious institutions across the globe, except I find no evidence of any arrests or convictions against Pharisees in relation to charges of religious paedophilia. Constructive feedback (with sources, please) on this is most welcome in comments.

For my hypothetical “master plan” to become reality, something else would need to happen for the operation to ooze credibility. Those with enough influence would have to arrange the “unthinkable”. Per normal administrative configurations (free of Pharisee infiltration), curates and vicars are “appointed” by religious institutions “in good faith”. This means someone or a committee of individuals must take responsibility for hiring (and firing). Therefore, musing over the fall of Jericho whilst outlining this reconstruction, all the Pharisees would need to do is to rig the recruitment process to ensure their (Passover style) chosen ones were in correct positions (so to speak) to permit operational success. It could also mean all sorts of nasties might be given responsible community roles, if that was the “ISIS style” objective. Imagine if the Pharisees had contacts in the prison system. Crime networks are other resource pools for undesirables. Would it be possible to not only hire strategic paedophile priests, but also throw in some extra shekels and promise of “protection” should any of the kids “blab”? At the correct juncture these priests would need to be sacrificed of course, but only long after the reasonable attitudes of congregations had been turned sourly toxic. The sourness would be for good reason. Traditionally, the most trusted member of any community was your priest. Were certain priests to turn into bare faced tyrants, God and faith are forlornly dishonoured.

Now it is important to cover the other side of the equation, the one most violets shrink from. The presumption that [per designation] “children” are not sexual, have no sexual needs and can be only corrupted (by “adults”) towards defilation is sheer bunk. When the law of the land stated that sexual consent between adults from age sixteen and above was natural and healthy, there was no rebellion against the “heinous” doctrine. In years gone by when the age of consent was considerably lower, maidens of all persuasions at age twelve saw great value in seeking to enter into matrimonial sexual alliances. One can only presume that prior to the implementation of legal frameworks, the only age barriers that inhibited sexual unions were the results of “family measures”. I would be willing to bet all the tea in China that if our current narcissistic consent legislations were repealed tomorrow, the “young” would “miraculously” find their sexuality again.

Masturbation is the best evidence for sexual drive and this unfortunately (to the monumental displeasure of sexual puritans) kicks in at very young ages. A phenomenon near exclusively confined to girls is the sexual “phase” I call “open” or “public” masturbation. Upwards of age six, females (in particular) demonstrate a desire to socially connect sexually. Conversely, ironically, young men prefer private masturbation (even when in groups). The Pharisees’ zeal knows no bounds. I have introduced the Puritan offshoot called Baptism before. According to Baptists, masturbation is a sin. Ambiguous in Catholicism, the heavy weight towards sexual procreation might encourage extremist views that also target and punish “self-sex”. Biased, fanatical opinions have been behind the attack on all forms of sexual expression in various Media formats. Obsessive hatred is so great towards the genre typically labelled “child pornography” anything bordering on lewd conduct has been framed and outlawed. People were not ever given the “choice”. There was no responsible debate and legislations have been reflectively austere.

Medias depicting children (as termed) masturbating are outlawed too. In fact, naked children in deemed to be “sexual poses” may also be “classified” as pornographic. Now, I can’t understand the logic underpinning the legislation of this genre. For a pose to be “sexual” it must legitimately arouse the viewer. Is the great body of Pharisaic elders exempt from judgement against their prohibited arousal? All jurors must scrutinise material evidence to form opinions, guided by legal professionals, of course. Child pornographic slides (when no sexual act can be identified) must cause sexual arousal to meet classification leaving only one question. Are “infected” prosecutors and jurors that have been aroused by child pornography safe to circulate socially and exempt from prosecution as “clinical” paedophiles? Pharisaic elders that appraise content to be sexual must surely also take some responsibility for judgement here. Though they were not directly exposed to sexual materials, and unless their laws are fraudulent, if they had been exposed they presumably could be aroused. This implies that they are classifiable as “clinical” paedophiles as well.

I gave the example of the body being a pyramidal structure below the mind earlier. Well, according to materialists this is not so (confirming why fanatical materialism is the utopian science-standard and Pharisees’ choice). The mind (per that insistence) is only a function of the “fully grown” body. Prior to reaching proscribed maturity, per this gobbledegook, bodies either have no or “swayable” (developing) thinking minds (except when this obstructs “the agenda” –  Jon Rappoport again). Conveniently, maturity kicks in precisely when law making moguls dictate measures. Therefore, if they were to say “maturity begins at age fifty”, then forty nine year olds would be “deemed” unable to make “informed decisions”. That means, of course, that victims of paedophilia are not only unable to legally consent to sex, they also cannot make any formal sexual decisions. How many articles promoting sentiment of “caring” paedophiles and their willing victims have been given primetime visibility by the mainstream (or alternative)? According to my research it has been a very long time since any visibility has been offered. Propaganda networks are only interesting in furthering their own agendas to the detriment of anyone that stands in their way.

Was Michael Jackson’s prosecution that never happened as described? In the way proceedings were “framed”, his alleged gift of $25 million to the guardian of a twelve year old boy was enough to underscore “guilt of sexual misconduct” for the gossip vultures, but was their conviction just? This goes far farther than merely highlighting the potential for blackmail. It demonstrates the potential gulf between effective truth, secular opinions on historic events and how “worldly” promotional materials cultivate accountability (or not). For instance, were we to presume that Michael Jackson truly did engage in sexual acts with the young “poster” boy in the spotlight, the only decent question that deserves righteous scrutiny is, “did the child consent or was he violated?”

“The consensual child”, the Pharisees quip, “how is that possible?”

In my last article, I referenced examples of various child prodigies as evidence towards my attempt to demonstrate how much diverse talent can be found every human pursuit. This in consideration, why would there not be sexual prodigies too? The preposterous superstition that posits all designate children as asexual could be easily undone with genuine committed research. Common amongst seventeenth and eighteenth century seafaring accounts are tales of sordid sexual escapades where age seems to offer no barrier. One notable volume details mariners’ activities while visiting Polynesian Islands. Texts report that women (regularly accompanied by siblings upwards of age eight years old) would swim to visiting ships offering those on board welcome and sex. According to the same reports, the young women sexually matched their seniors in every respect.  If one was to presume current age of consent laws are “divine”, would not this espouse that the majority of pre-Victorian era householders were systemic abusers? Prior to British William Gladstone’s 1870’s legislations, the age of consent was twelve years (complimenting the Roman philosophy on sexual maturity) and this ensured the majority of thirteen to fifteen years old women (per that classification) would marry to begin the arduous task of producing family heirs. At the time, childbirth was seen as a risky pursuit for women by their twenties so young plebeian marriages were encouraged.

Was the Victorian era we have as a legacy never to have happened (erasing William Gladstone’s sensationally degrading age legislation); Roman standards would likely be in place today (presuming no other vile avenues had disrupted the status quo). Though standards do not precisely match natural sexual reproductive maturity, the Roman opinion is far closer to it than the “eighteen rule” that oppresses current Western populations. Therefore one wonders if, just as homosexuals were vilified by rainbow movements that turned prior legal morality on its head, whether marginalised adult “minors” will seek aggravated revenge against the “system” at some time in the future. Could the young sue a system that stole their divine sovereign right to be sexual and reproduce? Awkward questions are always the best questions for they prophesise the path to sacred truth.

Continuing along this line of thinking regards repressed adult minors; correct contemplations will surely determine the problem is much greater than on “face value”. Taking the bull by the horns as it were, how would today’s determined-to-be sexual young find partners amongst indoctrinated “legal” adults? Would not the young that are in need of sex ultimately have to seek out paedophiles for their satisfaction? Were that uncomfortable symbiosis to be true, then clearly reason has been traded for vanity. It would make sense, because all “moralities” are forms of vanity. In light of this, when prophecy and associated predictions do little more than feed propagandists directives refined to permit universalisation of consensus view in their image, false Gods will reign over mankind. That is why below our modern day false Gods, spirits are invalids and souls may as well prostrate as lambs willing for sacrifice.

Preconditioning through the synthesis of deceiving divine values afflicts the social organ called “humanity” in its entirety. Every human being is infected and diseased in some way. Material symptoms most noticeably grant credentialed influencers (hawks and vultures by reasoned determination) the use of “devices” as lures for parasites (willing lambs for slaughter). Terms of standards that prevail are so arbitrary they cease to be relevant. The mantra of those that control is simple and effective “if we desire it, it is possible and therefore it will be”. Conquering natural sexuality has been their great prize; because once sex ownership is secured (perverted) life potence becomes suppressed to surrender point (i.e. master/slave catalyst). Surrender has meant that individuals “without visceral power” presumably have less prestige than programmable robots. I estimate fewer than ten per cent of “able bodied” society is actually needed for corporate commerce purposes. Indeed, with open minded unbridled investment into technologies, that estimation of labour requirement could be significantly reduced.

What we have is a situation whereby mainstream Medias have been able procrastinate well enough and consistently enough for “the masses” to believe there is an indefinite and constant labour shortage “somewhere”, “anywhere”. Enterprisingly, governments (for their part in this tryst) exist to concoct pointless ways of occupying the time of their enslaved chattel, perhaps to ward off popular rebellion, but mostly to show they are in control. Fiscal competition was never healthy or necessary if honest, socially serving government is to be given a chance at leadership. The universal Westminster System would not tolerate the notion. And it is a shame because it would make the world a better place for everyone, elites included. How about starting by investigating the potentially magical qualities of communal man? How about, instead of obsessively shutting out “unsanitary” potential, all doors to new avenues and abilities were opened wide with hendonistic gusto?

For obvious reasons (such as the attack on life potence), I have been focusing on sexuality. Gratuitous sex it could be argued is an art form, but it is not the only one. There are many other art forms (including war, when conveyance is correctly dedicated), far too numerous to list. Given the oversupply of labour for worthy industrial projects, why not test wider society’s devotion to craft? It seems to me the majority would be best put to use towards the overall entertainment of others, whether that is for “the few” or “multitudes”. Those that are able to craft would simply need to find natural vehicles for ambitions. Securing the correct preoccupation should be the role of any external social management mechanism (such as government). Instead, forcing “square pegs in round holes” “careers” on hapless conscripts has been proven to be neither constructive nor aptly overwhelmingly productive. How many wasted lives have supported the accountancy profession?

Perhaps I am being harsh on accountants here, but their negative outlook presupposes a limitless money supply would promote a guaranteed epidemic of laziness. Yet there is no reason hindering constant resources promoting limitless floods of cultural excellence. We can see evidence of the spontaneously effective outcomes of abundance in nature. There is also a deeper, natural reason why governments and their puppet masters would be wise not to continue their nihilist course devoted mostly to squandering abject lives for their “power highs”. Every human body (let us not forget) will double as uncontrolled (innocent) spirit and evolved (but not always wise) soul for the duration of the life term. For any cosmic improvement to manifest there must be sufficient recapitulation between old and new lives for trends to “bite”. When societal rules become too austere, past identities also risk becoming obsolete. Under those terms the existence model is rendered “futile” and this precedes grave danger. Should trends persist, the great “almighty” God is left with one humble option. It happened before and the event left an indelible mark last time round. Scientists label it “Big Bang” (there may have been numbers of these cosmic purges since existence began).

In so many ways my life serves as the testament to how “they” destroy prodigy. At age three or four, I was determined to become a concert pianist. My parents weren’t rich and were not prepared to spend money on a “useless” piano. My mother wanted me to become an accountant or a scientist, something “career worthy”, something “professional”. She did eventually succumb to my whining. At age nine I was given a piano by a boogie-woogie pianist who was a family friend. The problem was many of the notes did not function, including middle C, the F below, Bb above and much of the upper and lower registry also didn’t work. Accompanying lessons followed but how could I “fire” under those conditions? With poor note recall memory and imperfect pitch, I was never destined to be another Martha Argerich, Vladimir Horowitz or even Liberace (all Pleiadians, ironically?). But I did have something to give. I did have something in me that needed to be fulfilled and if the “system” was honest and sane, it would have engaged my fulfilment. Instead only my determination and dedicated belligerence “against all odds” ensured I found my way (Yes I am performing Beethoven’s Appassionata here) as a professional sounding amateur.

In summary, materialists use manmade terms to describe objects they don’t truly understand. They cast perspectives in what they generally suppose is “the human way” (when not in “conspiracy mode”). Science “proves” acknowledgement of symptoms and the use of system satisfying devices has replaced the void once occupied by prophets that uttered proverbial predictions. Either courted and contained consensus view in order to control and direct populism. Their ultimate goal is what’s more or less in place today: preconditioned, spiritless bodies in denial of birth right and unaware of soul purpose. The only “way out” is for mankind to learn to commune. Only then can humanity become “one race” (as it were) with divine intention to live the expressive power of corporeal God (Tamarian).