“1984” Unveiled Just in Time to Head off any Ascension of Man?

You can find Tim at https://www.deviantart.com “Edg3crush3r where he has some great commercial artworks for sale

For ill-informed, celebrated author George Orwell published a new sensational volume precisely one month after the reformation of Israel in 1948. The title he chose for his new book was “1984” which projected a future globe paralyzed beneath totalitarian control reminiscent of Huxley’s Brave New World ideology. Apt here, according to Thomas’ Gospel Jesus said “Damn the Pharisees! They are like a dog sleeping in the cattle manager. The dog neither eats nor [lets] the cattle eat.” In line, I regularly quote Krishna’s “forces of evil paralyze” and our global paralysis began in earnest from 1949 backing off a zealous program of universal immigration security. Per such auspices, it wasn’t too long before travel between intercontinental destinations would be impossible without a passport. What on earth has your passport to do with open rite of passage?

“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.” 1984 G. Orwell

Paradoxically, any ascension of man must motivate absolute harmonization of passage rite to have impacting effect. Thus, our “powers” overtly dedicated attack against true free right of expression undulates above vogue morality cultures and is aimed at containing sovereign liberty. The upshot amounts to this. Individuals have arguably never been furbished license to “think for themselves” since draconian conquest measures became outright. Symptomatic “Big Brother” ghosting technological advancements have managed to infiltrate just about every aspect of home and public life. There are currently no safe places to hide in the world, for the great group has made that their primary mandate. From this, it is imperative to observe a critical evolution. Universal removal of “harbor” commenced with implementation of immigration infrastructure.

Australian marine guards’ routinely boast no alien can penetrate the continental island’s thirty-six thousand kilometer coastline undiscovered.

Of course, conscience absent living has not been an arbitrary development. Crafting began long prior to the so-called Middle Ages (an apex period). Indeed, debatably, current “Illuminati practices” were rapidly cultivated in the post Roman Catholic dark ages. After Roman Emperor Constantine demonstrably “converted to Christianity” in 312AD (abolishing the known empire), the world would never be the same again. Unbeknown to most fanatical dedicates, this Christianity had made a mockery of Gnosticism (itself a rebrand of much more ancient “Atlantis” mystic spirituality). Unyielding purges of socially conflicting literatures (including outlaw of lost documents via various “Synods”) began with destruction of the great Alexandrian libraries. Dedicated thinkers should hardly marvel at the strange places hidden volumes of authentic texts (presented under auspices of Dead Sea Scrolls) have been uncovered.

Even when factoring in credence for doctoring, genuine Gnostic manuscripts present philosophies so markedly alien they could not be construed as evidence of evolution to mainstream Christianity. According to Arian Cathars (custodians of the Merovingian legacy), Christ was neither immortal nor miraculous. The term Christ in fact derives from Christos and, as such, is a Greek concept that envisages a new version of prophet king (prominent in biblical Old Testament folklore). Whilst my musings over Gnostic heritage may not seem directly relevant to “1984”, “druidic communion” has always been the alternative to New World Order. Whilst I haven’t personally read Orwell’s celebrated volume, I am versed as to synopses presented. Infinitely grander than other mildly confronting essays that thematically feature a cold war motif somehow vilifying deterrent hostilities, “!984” projects a globe deliberately plunged into ongoing conflict by opposing radical superpowers. Accompanying justifiable austerity measures propel solutions that equate to perpetual Martial Law. Political interests’ vice-like grip over world affairs symptomatically removes all limiting freedoms of expression.

Orwell’s revelations did predict a consequential a peace of sorts. None dare breathe too hard lest they be singled out by the “machine”. For ensuing public promotion might offer anyone up as a worthy example of defensible institutional correction. Orwell somehow uniquely manages to capture simmering pharisaic intent and percolate associated ideology into a compellingly pungent elixir. His overwhelming vision predicts war as the mechanism to guaranteeing universal subservience beneath common draconian laws. As such, “war is peace” on Earth can only be achieved via unbreakable governed “valued” control measures. The other option, its nemesis, is spontaneous evolution of aggregated self-ruling social collectives. Per Orwell’s projected philosophy, war most certainly does embody peace. The alternative, grass roots movements, were evident in Gnosticism’s attempts to amplify the ancient Atlantis model (spiritual authority guiding self-governance). Interestingly, that most abused Star of David (on Israel’s flag) is symbolic (of the Atlantis model). Consequentially, I feel sure over the ages skirmishes between Pharisees and Gnostics have been devoted towards outright ownership of their mutually prophesied messianic age.

Moving on, before we consider whether people are that stupid to fall for obvious deception associated with current worldwide quarantine facilities imposed against a theoretical medical threat I have argued must be misdirection (as presented, another short background would improve critical thinking. Were George Orwell’s ideological legacy to be brought into reality, we first must consider whether conflict or “communism” (caricatured in Animal Farm) would act as springboard. Communism, as rebranded “socialism”, has never really taken off. Still, authorities do prod at it from time to time, though none are committed to dealing with complexities attached to establishing realistic lasting communal freedoms. Their world, inch by inch, is not so gradually succumbing to one size fits all engineering. Aligned fake Gnosticism has neither proven compelling to the messes nor inspirational for supposed trend setters.

Ignoring those hardly relevant few hundred thousand World War II desertions, the only time the “establishment” has grossly miscalculated popular reaction to corporate determination was after conflict escalated in Vietnam. Vietnam effectively ended conscription because conscription no longer had the effect of entranced the masses. Powers had to reluctantly concede that the greater percentages of wider populations would no more sacrifice their lives for “king and country”. Neither will people accept nor contend with indefinite Martial Law without misdirection. Though fringe academia has acknowledged American healthcare organs (i.e. hospitals) are statistically far more lethal than battle, a breakdown of medical security against disease is the greatest social fear. Epping Studios vintage “Carry On” movies mocked British hypochondria. The only reason American hospital beds stay empty is majorities lack sufficient resources to be “sick”.

Taking this into account, the very first universal quarantine operation has predominantly been welcomed with open arms. Whilst the sacred few might howl “hoax” at the top of their voices, remonstrations have largely gone unheard by larger communities. My last two articles on the subject of Coronavirus identify a conspiracy bigger than Ben-Hur that stretches back more than twenty years to that HIV/AIDS psy-op (which corporate Medias assure us was an absolute “dud”). Given Bill Gates strategic role, I speculated the original plan was to synthetically effect a resurgence of the “dud”, but politics backfired when targeted Indian Hill Tribes “caught polio”. Ex. Buddy of disgraced Bernie Madoff, Dr. Anthony Fauci appears to have been in secret negotiations with Bill Gates’ foundation from 2010. Fauci is on front page of just about every newsstand as “lead expert” on Coronavirus.

Vigilant supporter and director of the Centres for Disease Control’s (a cartel of pharmaceutical enterprises that assumes an extra-government role) “contagion modelling”, the doctor bragged about, sorry, “predicted” a 100% certain imminent future pandemic back on his 2017 American University tour. Fortunately, the US surgeon general proved too resilient to corrupt. Over Trump’s smirks, he valiantly announced the American Government would opt for raw data modelling. Collected pertaining information released was as clear as day. Suffice to say, if Coronavirus wasn’t yet another “common influenza variant”, cause was definitely connected to the recent installation of the 5G network or, to be more specific, “extraneous technologies that emit electromagnetic pollutants.

My first article on the subject aimed at clearing up ignorance formulating science opinion determining viruses. Let’s face it, mainstream Medias, from day one, have been prepping us for an almighty “inoculation” campaign, the likes of which the globe has never seen before. In line, principles supporting conceptual contagious germs have become fortuitous building blocks that supposedly justify the case for a “vaccine protected world”, however academically flimsy. For instance, germ theory’s creator Rudolf Virchow clearly implied (what would later become known as) bacteria were the target. Though Pasteur appears to have adapted basis from Virchow’s classifications, paradoxically, his immunization theory targets what would become known as viral symptoms (called poxes then) which are safeguarded by synthetic compounds (sometimes including inorganic ingredients).

This enormous contradiction is rarely discussed with brevity in specialist papers or even observed by mainstream journalism’s generalist sentiment.

According to illustrious thought backing immunization, a body’s front line defenses (against any attacking illness) are naturally deficient. Yet, as if by miracle, formulated vaccines will stimulate “bionic” results in localized target areas even though, thus far, not one has been conclusively proven to work. Logic posits vaccines are not a defense against bacterial/fungal infection. Effective medical strategies combating these manner of attacks must take the form of solutions that directly target and completely kill off culprits without poisoning the body. There is something else though. Aside from “why disease at all?”, Virchow regretfully recanted his own theory late in life. His conclusions were simple. In principle, he argued the presumption that bacteria collected in clean water (sponsoring nothing to eat) was “nonsensical”. More importantly, associated rueful laments pondered (with abject bewilderment) why so many aggressive proponents were championing his flawed observations. Let’s hold that thought for a while.

So, my first article about Coronavirus discussed (1892 invented) viruses specifically. When Louis Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp walked the Earth side by side viruses didn’t exist. In fact, prior to 2019 Coronavirus (as per its current version) didn’t exist either. This is important to know, because my last article observed that post 2019 diagnosis of “allegedly” associated illness changed with the occurrence of the new complaint. Back in 2017 and 2018 pulmonary disease sponsored heart attack fatalities were as described. But now there is extreme ambiguity over the nature of all causes. Though symptoms leading to death may have been recorded as something else prior, it did not stop positive test results’ automatically reclassifying contemporary causes as Coronavirus. The funny thing is (something mainstream Medias try not to dwell on), numbers of Coronavirus false positives are too numerous to warrant statistics. An American nurse I interviewed some months ago needed to undertake a test to return to work. She wasn’t sick when she learned of her positive result and hasn’t been sick since.

Some might argue Coronavirus is “nothing new”. Contagion development has eerily mirrored that faltering thirty years old HIV path. It is no wonder, of course, because (as Dr. Judy Mikovits regularly emphasizes) the same basic players (connected to HIV) are critically running the current pandemic show.  To quote, she recently stated “identical [viral containment] measures are in place”. In my first article on the subject, I emphasized, following HIV, SARS, then wave after wave of bird flu strains (not to mention that swine flu dud) and Africa’s (George Soros’ brainchild) Ebola resurgence a few years back appeared to test predicted social reactions to a conceptual pandemic. I failed to mention that Soros is also one of the stakeholders involved with Gates’ Foundation’s Moderna vaccine. Naturally there have been negative academic reactions to all this. In fact, a veritable army (more than 40,000 last time I checked) of recalcitrant doctors have come out swinging at the “pointless” bureaucratic measures attached to Coronavirus and equally pointless, potentially dangerous, insufficiently or untested gene-altering vaccines. One aligned Norwegian highly qualified medic noted that his country’s death rate figures are normal, which means there is no pandemic [there].

23,000 words that formed into my prior two articles on the subject are ample, so I feel I have said enough about Coronavirus and its conveniently partnered “pandemic”. Nevertheless, the vaccine equation is a whole ‘nother story. In fact, I repeat that angry virtuous army of doctors has categorically remonstrated there is no pertinent reason to justify for vaccination against Coronavirus primarily because there have been no discernable causes of death so far. It is important to add, whilst mainstream western medicine generally ignores causes in preference towards catalogued symptoms development, the same basic premises apply. Following trends, high numbers of medics conclusively confirm that Coronavirus symptoms (as branded) are treatable, using standard “flu” remedies, such as vitamin D, zinc and other means. Will Trump’s “joke” about the complaint “disappearing” in April turn out true? But more about him and rigged elections later.

The Australian job market buckled and collapsed in response to governmental austerity measures. At the time, I was out of work. Other than a short, unprofitable stint back in September, my income options have teetered between giving Skype consultations and charitable handouts. I never supplement income with social security or “the dole” and, at US$250 or more a pop, Skype consultation requests have been thin on the ground. So, correspondingly, for the first time in my life, I have suffered writers’ block. Indeed, my heartfelt Christmas resolution to force myself back into the swing of things has barely produced a paragraph a day. But I’m not the only one suffering below the chaos that is one world government. There are subtle rumblings all around me. There is general distaste in bureaucracy. There is general distrust of corporate medias.

Momentum has led to a marked split forged between naysaying sycophants and causes without rebels.

For the last decade US electoral role statistics have been off the scale (not that any mainstream pundit would dwell on the fact). Usual excuses and objects of blame are used to justify figures, but is something else happening? Are people, slowly but surely, actually waking up for real? Certainly the same bad habits, general laziness towards activism paving the way for prevalent social parasitism, are very much alive and well. However, an ex-security guard advised me that airport scanners are not in place to necessarily uncover contraband. Their wider purpose (according to her information) is to scout for “new” genetic changes. Might this imply “the powers” anticipate a revolutionary super human manifesting at some juncture? Alternative circles of influence regularly speculate on attributes that will be possibly forthcoming from the so-called “5D” indigo child syndrome.

Dynamo and other billed “illusionists” now defy reality. To balance weighted objects on thin air is impossible. To bring printed butterflies to life is an act of God. Thus, today’s magic is more potent than illusion. We are either witnessing inter-dimensional fraud or manifest miracles of magnificent supremacy. Considerations surrounding such consequences could attribute an ascension of mankind. There has been a universal elevation of mind since 2011. It is worth reflecting on the “Mayan” wheel of the Sun (which, incidentally, could not have been carved after 10,500BC) here. Even though an unaccounted for full navigational degree is missing from the artifact, its supposed 2012 end date has proven a significant spiritual landmark. Yet, was fulfilment of the calendar’s complete cycle to symbolise the end of man’s spiritual demerit, then 2084 heralds our total shift into refreshed dimensional territory. It seems clear to me the process has already begun.

Given the grip materialism has on science philosophy few are able to appreciate what is meant by a “dimension”. So I think it is important to at least attempt to vanquish confusion. In line, diligently wise establish imperatives that all reality windows construct so-called “3D” models, even though, were holographic illusion to be perceived functionally, everything is flat packed and can be referenced via a solitary “zero” point. From within the many and varied illusory windows that permit realities, “objects” are formed from light. Because solidity is constructed from light it is frequency based. Components within (whether living or not) are tuned to specific ranges in order to function. Fundamental dimensions occupy extraordinarily large tranches of bandwidth (so certain informed sources break up composite real estate into graded portions, perhaps best compared to numerous channels waiting to be discovered on long wave radio). Accountably, there are only two black dimensions in total, which are (in part) constructed from the quantum layer. According to ancient sources, there are a further seven white dimensions, collectively known as “heavenly states”.

Congruent with this topic, upon ascension, our speculated dimensional shift will take us from the lower black dimension up into the higher one. Various effects are likely to be associated with the phenomena. Earth will apparently revert to Tara and our galaxy will blink into Holographic Universe Two. Nevertheless, according to Lemurian sources located inside the Jupiter moon Ganymede (who have sponsored information via Sixto Paz wells), Earth (and all she supports) doesn’t exist in Holographic Universe Two. On this, by way background, my other website discusses Earth’s relevant reconstruction from the debris of Tiamat in some detail. That billion years old divine intervention caused a new timeline to formulate, so, upon our ascension, there must be a logical merger of the two timelines. Topology of new Earth will significantly change as a result. Tara, if superficial accounts are to be believed, is of notably greater volume than today’s Earth. According to other folklores, our sun will transform into a shimmering rainbow coloured planet. Partnering star (that perished due to Tiamat’s accumulated residue debris around 200 million years ago) remains unscathed in the alternative timeline, so one must presume a cleanup initiative was rapidly implemented directly after Tiamat’s destruction. Replacement of the energy need void left by our current sun’s transformation has clearly been prepared for by Almighty God.

Yesterday a far from happy new year was ushered in to pops and bangs angrily proliferated by hapless Arabs that surround my locality here. Today I have been reflecting on the last twelve months; possibly the most placidly turbulent of my life. According to her family, my Thai wife “died”, though I don’t necessarily believe them. That relationship hinged on my constant financial support and when the money dried up, it withered with those desert carcasses. Nevertheless, fortune has blessed me with a new supreme spiritual partner; this time remarkably younger than myself and from the heart of Europe. With an angel of love on my shoulders pain of suffering has significantly eased, but I still require an income. It would be remiss of me not to tender a shameless services plug in light of this. My infamous Skype consulting sessions come at a hefty price, though participants regularly remind me they are cheap “considering the weight of information” that is always supplied. Generally focusing on and providing analysis of paranormal, extra-terrestrial and extra-dimensional connections, I am possibly the only person on this planet with access to certain deeply buried truths. You can read more about me here.

In my elevated frame of mind, on one of my regular outings to job interviews, I discovered a new iPod music album I didn’t realise I had. Comprising an unreleased selection of tracks by Janis Joplin, I couldn’t help but admire some of her words, which are so worthy today, they demand reproduction. Reminiscing on my new found love her lyrics framing “Road to Nowhere” were particularly poignant. However, a solitary simple line significantly stood out from all others, so I feel it would be sheer madness not to reveal it in context of this article. Janis screamed (as only she could do) “everyone knows freedom is another word for nothing to lose” at the top of her voice, but why so? Nothing to lose doesn’t seem like freedom to me, Yet, when I consider little people; all those vulnerable slaves to order, it actually becomes second nature for me to redeem Janis’ stark message. “Freedom”, according to those that demand they rule over us, is what they tell us we are allowed to do. Is this the fundamental reason why unprecedented US voting statistics have percolated menacingly for the past decade?

Trump’s diehard supporters are serious. Civil war threats have been tendered against all Democrats. Against the backlog of phony-baloney “COVID” (lest anyone dare research Coronavirus history) austerity, have authorities miscalculated the will of the plebiscite? Perhaps primary sincere reasons for the unnecessary quarantine affront is directly connected to the feared ascension. I say feared here, because, when the ascension erupts in full force, everyone will have no option but to wake up. As past African philosophers have rued; an alert populous is extremely dangerous. Thusly, it is no wonder forlorn teacher Jon Rappoport regularly emphasizes, measures sewn into the education system are designed to diffuse logic. Worse still, they have been in place for years. Obviously that calculative strategy to erase dissent has partial failed, considering the past decade’s electoral disharmony. But how and why has Trump galvanized populism?

Deaf to Robert Kennedy Junior’s emphatic pleas, he did not engage his supposed planned review of tainted vaccines. Nor did I once hear mention of the angry component Thimerosal in his garbled rhetoric. He has done nothing to limit Israel’s supreme authority over the United States. He did not reverse any of Obama’s Globalist backed assiduous erosions of the mighty constitution. His valiant enclave insisting on once and for all truth clarity over “9/11’s” Twin Towers attack fizzled out before it began. So, what has Trump achieved to draw such notorious popular support?

Or is he the wild card that takes the brunt of general hatred towards egalitarian abuses of power paralleling a mythical shadow government agenda?

After reviewing his long list of executive orders, the two that particularly stand out are his repeal of Obama’s prized “Affordable Healthcare Act” and the legitimisation of that notorious Keystone pipeline. He added a further layer of protection defending America’s violent police officers. Attempts to overhaul it have left America without a Department of Justice. “Buy American, Hire American” does appear to tighten up patriotism, so perhaps that is the initiative of appeal. However, from my cursory analysis, formal political change has been dwarfed by iconic bluster so, it seems to me, as usual people have largely fallen for the bullshit. Symptomatically, Trump has morphed into a figurative revolutionary. “We wanted to believe [it was] so it was”. Case in point, in other writings I have emphasized general adherence to facts and truths is incidental. If fantasy mimics popular vision, it will be served up and believed.

Malicious theatricals crafting the phony-baloney Coronavirus “pandemic”, if nothing else, have proven that deceit can be passed off as truth, not universally, but enough to “convince” population majorities. This predicts grave danger for the susceptible. I introduced Dr. Anthony Fauci and entrepreneurial Bill Gates earlier. Fauci is one of the leading masterminds behind promotion of our current fictitious pandemic and was a personal friend of the rogue financier, jailed Bernie Madoff. Furthermore, according to Dr. Judy Mikovits, he ruined her career because of the lies they spun about HIV more than twenty years ago. Incidentally, to repeat, it is her opinion that the current pandemic psy-op is precisely modelled on HIV “safeguard” philosophy. We know that America’s valiant surgeon general rejected the Gates/Fauci (a Centers for Disease Control director) backed contagion model. Other countries did succumb to the globalist wave, but, from American circumstantial data, we learnt that Coronavirus is most likely caused by electromagnetic pollution. Period.

Whereas Fauci has been relatively circumspect, Gates’ initiatives have left a trail of destruction around the globe over the past decade or more. Alarm bells should have been raised amongst the sensitively attuned after his genetically modified mosquitos’ debacle. Last article, I highlighted an alleged international class action against Gates. Although I find zero verification from mainstream sources, an abundance of accusations highlights significant fallout from the Gates Foundation polio vaccine gift to the hill tribes of India. It turns out prior Media hyped philanthropy was simply designed to give evil credibility. From India Gates moved to Africa (just in time for Ebola). There, research insiders (representing the various nations advocated), determined Gates’ vaccine caused more polio than it treated (even though vaccines do not treat illness per Pasteur’s immunization theory), so relevant authorities promptly ejected foundation goodwill. There were other side effects, but these become much more worthy of discussion upon review of “next port”.

Unperturbed, our newly disgraced entourage decided it was fine to accost the peoples of the Philippines. That was next stop on their onerous path. Diabolic ambitions became rather more transparent this time. For some inexplicable reason, while there, Gates decided his vaccine was only worthy for supple, young women. Nevertheless, appreciative authorities didn’t become alarmed until long after side effects were known and knowledge was circulated. Significantly, the in focus pep potion had somehow managed to sterilize Manila’s young ladies. In my first article on Coronavirus, aside from exampling Gates’ father’s well publicized eugenics fanaticism, I referenced a quote from Wikipedia which stated (words to the effect), “sterilization serums do not exist”. Attention was also made to a possible grand “bait and switch” eugenics campaign whereby masses could be “vaccinated” against phony-baloney Coronavirus while the real purpose was to sterilize them. In relation, those murky Georgia Guide Stones were offered as a prime exhibit, which inspired a supplementary $64 question.

How to reduce populations to the demanded 500 million in double quick time without breaking the funeral system?

At my other esoteric website, sometime before Christmas I offered readers an introduction to my miserable circumstances which I explained was courtesy of none other than Australia’s governmental austerity. We haven’t had it too badly (comparing other nations) and, but for Melbourne’s brief drift into soft Martial Law, there have been no lockdowns or “directives” that I know of. Back in March last year, contrary to statisticians’ outpoured waffle, the Sydney job market collapsed. By Christmas, it still hadn’t recovered. Advertisers were regularly less than sincere about motives. In addition, a recruiter told me they were receiving around fifteen times the number of normal expected applications per job. Approximately seventy other bona fide applicants joined me in tendering a proposal dedicated to winning an engaging role offered by a company called “Pragmatic Thinking”. My colourless effort failed to impress. Nevertheless, as if ordained by the highest God, Sydney’s business development/relationship building job market did make an extravagant comeback in the New Year. There were more positions vacant than “usual” (whatever that is) on the 4th January.

Was this evidence of the new employment explosion I predicted and thought would happen mid last year? Figures jagged back to a little above new normal the following day. Clearly the government needed to step in and do something rapidly or the trains would be back to capacity (proposing an even greater mockery of current social distancing compliance). On 6th January, I was forced to venture to the supermarket with my final $7.90 (enough for a paper bread loaf, milk, a small can of sardines and four litres’ of diet tonic water). Travelling “hobo” (I had no money to recharge my prepaid travel card), something seemed odd about my sparcely populated carriage. Perhaps the holy grail (my local shopping centre destination) would reveal all. And, did it just? A sea of ugly muzzled faces, as if drafted from Denver’s sensational airport by those mendacious forces of evil, ambushed my gaze. Sydney’s fifteen percent “permanently afflicted” had spread acute infection to ninety-five per cent of peoples’ overnight (perhaps symptomatic of NSW transport’s “mandatory” face covering initiative). So many were masked, no one seemed to notice my Islamic veil (well, if you can circumcise boys and girls, why not veil them too?) was absent.

Naturally the logical prognoses for this epidemic within a pandemic was two pronged. Fallacious “New World Order” fueled Medias had captivated near universal stupidity. They confirmed normally balanced members of society will morph into morons of the most intense bewilderment because their “TV’s” tell them to do so. Knowledge casts a grim light on any possibility of “the many” being saved prior to the scheduled pre-ascension population purge. Our presumed superficial target is the removal of 95%. This would leave an accordingly “manageable” (as is supposed) stock to fodder the messianic age. And based on that mysterious seven billion global population figure, three hundred and fifty million are posthumously “destined” to survive transition into Brave New World territory. We’ve already seen a glimpse of the powers’ spiteful plan. After the apparent “bait and switch” Norwegian vaccines [caused] deaths, Biden’s “old people die” comment should really hit home, but it won’t. Pfiser’s poison potion may have been too cold to be stored in Australia, according to Media liars, but other less conspicuous sources advised that “trials” had “given” lab-rats HIV.

That aside, to put it bluntly, people are generally playing their roles beautiful as surrogate victims for slaughter, regardless of whether death or impotency is the imposed authoritative choice. No better was this stated when I made another corporate shopping trip to my local Woolworth’s supermarket. As I attempted to enter that store, a rather suspect Indian security guard blocked my path. His face was so well covered; it was impossible to distinguish features. Rudely gesturing with swaying arms, an extended finger seemed to glance my chin. From the whirling black hole that once was a visage transmitted a muffled, accented exclaim, “Please wear your mask”. Looking directly into where his eyes should have been, my pointed response was as indignant as I could make it without being overly threatening. “I’m sorry, I don’t wear a mask”. “I don’t possess one”. Then followed a few moments of stunned silence that lingered for an eternity. Eventually the guard stepped back aghast and meekly whispered, “Oh, you don’t have a mask. Ok, then”, before melting back into his surroundings like a spent vapid ghoul.

It is easy to blame the “powers” for all of this, whereas the people should take responsibility. Though on many occasions I’ve written about dubious double standards precipitating “the system”, such as in my The Mindset of Psychosis, order banks on courting two irredeemable human anti-qualities.  Far from questioning everything, the average man is convinced his belief-systems are infallible. Anthems promising libertarian freedoms routinely brand “alternative” political straightjackets instead. So when Janis Joplin screamed her harsh words “freedom is another word for nothing to lose”, she was predicting failure of government. But this by no means gave sovereignty any ankle-hold or legitimacy. Indeed, the truth is quite the reverse. Sovereignty is generally despised because it empowers “strangers” (or others). Any stranger is the devout enemy of patriotism which means “the other” symptomatically becomes the great existential threat. Those that govern realized the people don’t want freedom long ago. People want either to be part of the greater good or part of the never world where overlooked corruption reigns.

As I valiantly marched on, I couldn’t help reflecting on the security guard’s attitude. The poor fellow so well believed Media fueled pandemic hysteria, he couldn’t account for anyone not actually possessing a mask. If motive here had been cause of better safe than sorry philosophy, I estimate the fellow’s reaction would have been far more muted. As it was, he, in my opinion, aptly captured the mood of the majority of Australians, each and every one hypochondriacs-in-waiting. Decades of aggressive plague “warnings” had primed expectations towards an inevitable disaster. Notable shortages of actual ill and dying has not dinted macabre apprehensive spirit one iota. Therefore, it is clear vaccine producers will struggle to keep pace with appeal for the redemption jab, which is heartening news for the sacred few. Given demand, mandatory terms to best ensure everyone complies would be unlikely. Even if legislation was drafted, wide enforcement should be deemed improbable. Australians are by no means the only lambs to the slaughter. I learn “young people” of Romania will be vaccinated from the beginning of April. Italy has threatened curfew measures for conscientious objectors. If their planned draconian legislation goes ahead, international travelers will each need to provide a vaccination certificate before embarkation. They surely arbitrate a generous role for corrupt doctors n’est pas?

Kevin Rudd “Murdoch’s goons know no shame. Not only do they claim “free expression” to defend violence-inciting hate speech, but they fraudulently invoke the Holocaust [fraud] to claim they are being oppressed”

Thus, shadow government fed & funded pariah Medias crap on eternally, information, piece by piece, fueling maligned belief systems that eventually congregate into populist nirvana. Populist nirvana is contrived to confabulate all laws governing conscience. Perceived need for “group” freedom (or new order) has sponsored worldwide private disobedience which erupts into pockets of civil unrest. America, in particular, is teetering on the brink of civil war; a civil war unlike any other experienced before. No wonder for all that “shill” preparation via alternative Medias over the last two decades. There is motivation behind promoted government law enforcement ammunition stock piles. Construction of numerous FEMA concentration camps will eventually be revealed purposeful. Fanatical zeal applied to the removal of dangerous weapons from the private sector will soon be crystal clear.

I feel compelled to reference the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas again here. Verse 16 “Perhaps people think I have come to cast peace on the world. They do not know that I have come to cast conflicts upon the earth: fire, sword, war. For there will be five in a house: there’ll be three against two and two against three, father against son and son against father, and they will stand alone”. Verse 30 “The Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered nor have they allowed those who want to enter to do so”. Given man’s pathetically weak spiritual state, I have contemplated whether his scheduled ascension might be replaced by an orchestrated synthesis of sorts. Precipitating ancient Atlantis civilisations, Pleiadan “mer” people (Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians | I am Exopolitician, iXossana reincarnated (wordpress.com)) were successfully able to spin honest fantasy in a manner that encouraged uniform communion. Ex. Government Meteorologist, Charles Hall has predicted a strategic “messianic” role for a group of extra-terrestrial he calls the “Tall Whites” (a more up-to-date genetic version of human). I hear rumours from the “brotherhood” that one is located in Rome, Italy. If wider surrounding information is to be believed, he is completely responsible for current macro-directional politics governing Earth affairs. A rigorous top down approach might well have sufficient effect to construct the un-constructible – a Brave New World of unlimited cosmic proportions. The people continue with their blissfully unware for there is nothing to see here.

The “Powers’” Great Accolade – “Brand Pedo”

Imagine, if you will, there existed a world populated only by biological automatons that were solely allowed to survive at the behest of a vague commercial bureaucracy. Because of this uncertainty, imagine if none of these automatons realised they were abject properties of a brutal federal control program. If the slave masters, the “authorities”, decided they desired to stamp their immense power over will, to “once and for all” demonstrate their authority over the slave classes, could they outlaw or remove all fluid or solid sustenance resources without losing or graphically impairing their prized stock? Could they make the air unfit for consumption or destroy all known shelter to stress their despotic ambition? No, the only the true liberty they could possibly take away without permanently impairing labour is “unnecessarysexuality. That world does exist. It is planet Earth and the ignorant, naive biological automatons are human slaves; fodders dedicated for a system that deliberately transcends spiritual logic and reason in order to complete and maintain its program,

By corporate commercial determination, per “the program”, paedophilia is the root of all evil, and for reasons that so firmly contradict erudite populism, truth has become obsolete. The term paedophilia itself is nonsensical was it not for the fact that just about everyone has been radicalised into believing trappings of propaganda. So, going back to basics, it would be correct to start by analysing authentic etymology of terms in order to corroborate any coherent meanings. Only by careful analysis of the cold, dry facts can sound “basis” encapsulating the mainstreamers’ obtuse view be deciphered.

Paedophilia is a combination of two Greek words. One (paidos) means child and this is topically self-explanatory. The other, philos, calculates rather more problematic interpretation. Yes it translates to mean “love” as would be expected within the cognitive frame of child love. Nevertheless, the Greeks had three words (eros, agape and philos) to represent the emotion. Eros is used to convey an earthy erotic, sexual passion or lust. Agape is an emotional spiritual bond that perhaps might signify symptoms such as pity, togetherness or other deep soul connections (shall we say). Philos proposes a brave new world, one that is generally estranged from the Western concept of love. It is the Greeks’ “intellectual love” evocation and this might be best appraised as “to be on the same wavelength” (with others). Respect of a peer would make an acceptable version of the same concept.

Therefore paedophilia literally means “respect for children”, so how on earth did it translate into the ugly mess that has embraced the greatest of all modern day hysterias?

It seems likely (though I find no evidence of historic accountability) that the term was originally sponsored by those that formed special liaisons with children. It was a way of justifying engagements that might have otherwise been frowned upon by wider society. Promiscuity is a revelation of modern times, awoken by the 1960’s flower power sexual revolution. Prior to that lust outside marriage was a profound negative and “age restriction” on unions had been superficially imposed by religious authorities for so long that physical adult child pairings would have seemed unconscionable. This is not to say rules were not broken behind closed doors. Suffice to say, prior to the 1960’s suspicious borderline adult relationships would have had to have been considered lust free but always either plausibly “working towards marriage” or “undeniably platonic” for seemly social tolerance.

It was only after sexual revolution, political authority saw value in promoting homosexuality as a crass attempt to pervert all sexual relationships (i.e. by reversing principled traditionalism that defines sexual intercourse as a procreation precaution and not as a recreational tool, cultural insanity was born. Of course, this merely acts as a stepping stone towards outright control of the human mind – “you will behave as we say anytime we lecture you”). Thus those rabid synthesised outcries at phantom paedophilia are backed off strategized and scoped political support aimed at positively accelerating homosexual causes. “Contradictory” pederasty was most recently (1600’s onwards) adopted by the French (pederastie) from the Latin paederastia (Greek – paiderastia) and popularly translates to mean “lover of boys”.

Remarkable French piano prodigy and composer Camille Saint-Saens, a covert gay of the high Victorian period, once famously reported, “I am not a homosexual. I am a pederast”. This ironically demonstrates how much values have changed. Homosexuality was stigmatised because it was deeply hated (though undoubtedly egged on by political shit-stirrers) throughout cosmopolitan society and, therefore, illegal. Underage sex was not illegal, but because sex outside marriage was so universally chastised, “decent” normal folks would have found the practice unthinkable.

Even so Saint-Saens innocently reveals evidence of two streams of social conditioning. To admit to have been homosexual would have enraged retribution to beyond the pale so it was denied. Yet to confirm his overt but ambiguous paedophilia was the best way of diffusing allegations against him and shutting up critics. Of course there is much more to this tale (which circulated around his regular trips to Algeria – a place renowned for egregious sexual tolerance at the time). Saint-Saens cast himself as the paternal spirit ever excited by the ambitions of youthful innocent exuberance and not as a lecherous molester of children.

Ancient sexual roots of pederasty were neither explored nor acknowledged as relationships were symbolised as paternally platonic per the cultural view. However, the stem “erasty” is a version of erasthai (Latin) for which eros (Greek sexual love) is a derivative. This should emphasise the nonsense of modern times’ furore. If sex between adults and children was to be intimated by a slur, then pederasty is the ideal term. In fact, though it is believed to have originally been used to describe adult/minor homosexual trysts, the etymology is actually formally gender neutral. Does the “substitution” of paedophilia (in place of pederasty) not aptly highlight the wilful arrogance/ignorance of mainstreamers?

Many well founded information sources have come to light that broach the rather obvious homosexual connection to global control networks after Gary Allen’s tantalising volume “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” was published in 1972 (only a year before the Trilateral Commission was formed by late David Rockefeller). Those behind the eugenics movement aiming to radically reduce global populations have been implicated as players in the “program” many times. Whether this is true or not is open to debate, but philosophic motives are beyond argument.

If all population units were strictly homosexual, then procreation would require external management, perhaps offering theoretical provisos such as medical intervention to save humankind. Younger more fertile parents produce stronger offspring that live longer and this corroborates (though statistics are “contradictory”) a matched conspiracy. Paedophilia (younger, more fertile) has been outlawed whereas homosexuality (guaranteed infertile) is now both legal and encouraged (with initiatives such as sex change development offered to “asexual” [sic] children as young as four years old). Clearly all measures improve the ongoing population control/reduction agenda. I should add that whereas some institutionalised heterosexuals may argue they have a right to abolish repulsive homosexual practices, any [even justifiable] overt or covert despotism still prepares undeniable infringements against sovereign liberties.

Eugenics’ attack on the people has been unyielding. Wars used to be the preferred vehicle. Yet, as I write, the American “health system” (for instance) debatably shows up ten to a hundred times more effective at disposing of populations than war, depending on which statistics are favoured. Several drugs (including dozens of branded opiates) administered under the banner of “healthcare” are known to kill or impair life. The best reference is “auto-immune deficiency” so-called AIDS. Harmless retrovirus HIV was blamed for [known] effects caused by previously shelved (1950’s) chemo drug AZT. Naturally symptoms have been by no means limited to HIV “sufferers”. Timothy McVeigh’s foolhardy quest to bring down a building in Oklahoma City in 1995 was masterminded by the same powers he was attacking in defence of the “program”. They were behind the (at least) 50,000 AIDS related deaths of First Gulf “War” veterans. Ignorant conscripts were killed by their supposedly “protective” medications.

To be honest I believe the 1960’s flower power movement was a corporate inspiration too. Either that or corporates rode the coattails of the general erosion of faith in traditionalism (also a reaction to the distrust that blew over into anti-war mass desertions from Vietnam?). When did “the people” ever make any sincere [group] initiatives for themselves? I believe the powers wanted to introduce contraception universally. By that token, temporarily encouraging promiscuity was the only rational lever against the [Catholic] Church. Even so, to this day Catholicism has not bowed to Zionism on that level. The sexual revolution was predictably short lived. Prominent film stars, HIV and AIDS put a huge damper on any free thinking after the 1980’s.

It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world.

I haven’t personally referenced Jon Rappoport’s “AIDS Inc.” (1988) but I feel sure he will have delivered correct conclusions after reviewing his various websites. Paedophilia is also nothing short of a stagnant political move as are all other trappings designed to bolster the Eugenic movement’s determination to deny life. Forget the hotbed “abortion”. From the lofty position of purity, is not contraception the undeniable attempted murder of an unborn child? Given their Zionist-Bolshevik tactics, I would be very surprised if the visceral anti-abortion lobby is not another face of the same arbitrary plutocracy. When “they” decide they need to repopulate, anti-abortion will become the new flavour of the month. Currently abortion is a decoy that removes the sting from contraception.

Those demonstrably anti-paedophilia have been set up, applied more or less zero attention to the real issues. The shambles that is “organised” (a splintered, refracted mess) society is our testament. Rationalist Eckhart Tolle makes a surprising amount of sense in his claim that classical crusaders crusade merely for empowerment of their egos. I extend that philosophy somewhat and emphasise the bigger and more divisive the “cause” (sic), the greater the “individual” empowerment. There is no bigger cause than paedophilia currently. It is the mother of all causes today. Protesters, critics and complainers keep well clear of truth in order to preserve their egos. Maintaining the fantastical narrative line in deference to truth is the objective goal. Besides, if their “big issue” was to evaporate indefinitely, aimless lives would have nothing to bolster egos. Political spin, intricate make-believe dressed as truth has avowed the horrible “standards” that have cultured public infatuation.

Because the cultivation of biological automatons is the brainchild of the “program’s” covert marketing arm, Zionism (symbolising prison planet), there is almost absolute topical congruity between the mainstream and “alternative” press instruments. Alternatives also weave their own brands of make-believe and encourage that most foul of whimsical, plausible denials’ – “who to believe?” Indeed, as most independent or third party writers and journalists are incapable of doing much more than parroting or reacting against information issued by mainstream/alternative “authorities”, sanity has become wedged somewhere between a rock and a place beyond vital imagination. Even the great Jon Rappoport hasn’t ever dared offer paedophilia a fair birth from what I have read. Only an extraordinary journalistic genius with a death wish could and would religiously tackle this subject with unbiased sincerity. Like homosexuality in its wake, paedophilia now humbles the zealous.

Arguably everything political began with the collapse of Atlantis. After the Pharisees (the theoretical Atlantis “derelicts” Nicolai Levashov mentions in his illuminating book “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors”) conquered relative druidism 3,000 years ago, a globalist agenda has followed the uniform path towards the “program’s” unilateral attempt aimed at shaping all other creeds and cultures in its image. Permitting only Puritan adjusted worship is one of the many small steps aimed to configure that grand design. Sharia Law (a cauldron of intolerance; banning all manners of sexual expressions), incidentally, few seem to real realise, is iconic Zionist Law.

Political charades “for order” are exploited by puppeteers that use militant groups (deliberately formed for such purposes) such as “ISIS” and “Al Qaeda” to instil fear. Labelling of designate “children” (with 21 desired as the ideal age barrier) and applied sexual prohibition has been a long standing goal that heralds back to the Victorian era (and presumably prior). In some ways it surprises me that Gladstone did not realise the utopian objective back in the nineteenth century. Although with infant mortality prevalent and the need for fodder for wars to once and for all break the opposition in his time, outcomes and their contingencies have been predictable to say the least.

Maybe it was last year or perhaps the year before when I noticed a mainstream headline that poked me in the eye. It was significant enough to spur me to remove MSM as my default webpage. The article in question presented one of America’s provincial sheriffs’ who was voicing implausible concerns over a child rape trial. The “child”, at the time, had been seventeen years old. Two days before her eighteenth birthday, she had allegedly voluntarily engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse (statutory “rape”) with her [then] boyfriend. Only in America could a “trial” like that be “taken seriously”. But it does highlight the fact that the “program’s” zeal is all about fanatically vigilant oppressive power of order, bereft of sane judgement. Australia (where I live currently) handles these matters differently.

Over a decade ago a mature looking twelve year old, blonde haired girl produced a bouncing heir with her [also] underage boyfriend (if memory serves me right, he was fifteen). The sensational TV show “Current Affair” was all over the news like a baby’s rash. They “named and shamed” everyone they could collect until everyone associated turned bright purple and frothed at the mouth. Nothing was done about the couple because nothing could be done so, after the furore, everyone politely looked the way, except there was a sequel. The hapless girl dared produce a second sprog at age sixteen by the same father (this time presumably of father worthy age). Sacra-bleu!!!!! I hope the TV show paid her well. She deserved every cent. He was almost certainly jailed for twenty years or more.

There is actually quite a long history behind changing attitudes. Chronologies (were they to be read and digested) would go a long way to diffusing the sheer insanity that currently embroils the paedophilia “outrage”. Attitudes have, in some ways, remained the same but it is reflective contingences employed that have radically altered. Perhaps making the adolescent discovery tour “theoretical” has helped induce mesmerised masses. People’s inability to focus on anything in isolation (thus perpetually basing existence on generalities) appears to be the most devastating symptom of the “TV age”.

One could look back at the collapse of craft industries in favour of industrial commercialism as the beginning of the withering of independent mind [that worked off trial and error and, ultimately, questioned everything]. In the eighteen and nineteenth centuries there were occasional challengers. Disparate groups, such as the Luddites, did attempt to block imperial progress. Interestingly, prior toindustrialisation”, learning centres were almost exclusively used to prepare society’s elite classes. In fact, going much further back, I would argue it was only after the abolition of the mystery schools (run by the druids) in the Dark Ages that saw the shift from education to processed dogma learnt by rote as the staple for mainstream education.

Even those that complete a Master’s Degree today are given no marks for personal input beyond how it satisfies comprehension of “evidence”) (i.e. synthesised “worthy” information that has been rubber stamped by “credentialed” proscribed agents of globalism under the thumb). To which end eventually none dare question established “rules” which are actually beyond question. It is also duly noted that the precise same strategy has been used by political proponents that word laws governing paedophilia in ways to ensure any possible “right minded” intellectual protagonist’s challenge would be judged as spitefully ambiguous (at best). I find no evidence supporting rationale behind our current childhood threshold and can but assume the demonstrably baseless “18” figure was pulled out of thin air at the whim of some starched bureaucrat or other. Globalist hacks have been running “Holocaust style” attack campaigns against anyone that dare test viability ever since.

It was not that long ago when the age of [marital] consent was “12” (following ancient Roman tradition) in some US states and the European nation of Holland. America may be recognised as the modern day super power, but originally it was founded and developed as a formidable expansion of the Union of Jacob (or Great Britain), so the history of English law making plays extreme relevance to this debate. There was no legal age of consent until one of the British Middle Ages Kings decided to impose boundaries through fear that there would be no under limit to matrimonial alliances (or presumed sexual liaisons) with maidens. I am deliberately foggy on “which king” it was because I would like it to be Norman Jew William the Conqueror (who ushered in a “new age of [cloaked] Zionism”) as it does fit well with my overall patter. So if he’s the one, top marks for me.

Either way, for the best part of a millennium “the people” and their ruling powers had no objection to marital unions between de facto “adults” from age twelve. It was a king (the “contemporary” power) who had instigated radical new restrictions (be it conceived from ancient foundations) which also implies some marriages (prior to law) were made between parties (maidens specifically) aged less than twelve years. One would imagine that a small popular core would have always been against “young” marriages, whereas the majority must have been easy with whatever was the conventional norm. The perennial remainder (probably an equally distinct minority) are traditionally mostly shown as bloated cadaverous sorely vocal antagonists destined to bluster at first sight of illuminated “reasoning” by compilers of historic propagandas. Those that covet callous restrictions will do anything to preserve them.

In medieval times (as emphasised earlier) the age of consent strictly concerned marriage but did not place any focus on sexual activities outside matrimony. That was left to religion. Western religion is an adaptation of Roman paganism. Therefore when Christianity sprouted from the burning embers of Gnosticism, naturally austere (Pharisee promoted) rules were applied to marriages which ideally revered all lustful and licentious behaviours as “ungodly”. A functional allowance was made for purposes of procreation. Per this fashion, an adaptation of orthodox Jewish attire, the Christian bridal gown, attempted to limit “lustful” sexual intercourse between marital partners. Even so, for a great period (can anyone say with “authority” how long?) the proverbial line was drawn at age “12”.

So how has this ongoing “con operation” been run in a way to successfully beguile the madding masses? Today’s mental health institutions and asylums for the insane provide glimmers of insight. I determine that the profession’s handbook outlining three hundred or so “behavioural conditions” is simply an expansion of crass religious judgement as to what it is to be “good” or “evil”. Jon Rappoport regularly advises all behaviours classed as varied evidence of insanity are equally symptoms of normal behaviour. Evil (as termed) actions therefore are now indefinitely branded as manifest insanity. Modern society runs on adapted rules that are designed to obfuscate the truth, so while one could argue we are either “more” or “less” free than before, in principal only “terminologies” have changed and not the convictions that delivered them.

When the world was conquered in the 1650’s (capitalising on discoveries such as the United States of America), there was an uncomfortable transition from royal to civilian government power. The full changeover took about 300 years and today no royal wields any visible power. It was only after civilian government was firmly rooted that perceived social issues were targeted by the pariahs of control to facilitate their utopian dream agenda. Of course, the ideal policy (as far as they are concerned) is always eradication, but when (as is so often true) extreme measures fail, soft humanitarian ploys are stealthily drafted. Similar to current workings of political/legal administration, reasons behind tortured virtue offered as “grounds” rarely (if ever) matched true objectives behind schemes unveiled as “value solutions”.

High Victorian British politics eventually found a Prime Minister with the right measure of zealous hatred to tackle youth sex head on with a proverbial sledge hammer. Himself a reputed brothel crawler (and paedophile), William Gladstone first increased the age of consent to “15” in 1875. So foul was his hatred it inspired infection and; consequentially, he succeeded in raising “the bar” again to “16” by 1878. This did nothing to inhibit intimate relations with children, as evidenced in outpourings of diatribe over the plight of a pregnant provincial London prostitute aged ten in the early 1900’s. Whether the girl was anything more than a figment of the imagination remains to be proven. There are numerous other period artistic writings that might be sourced to highlight identical topical content.

Logic underpinning Gladstone’s reasoning behind the marital age of consent increases was null and void, more or less precisely equating to William the Conqueror’s war spoil “logic”. Age fifteen, and then sixteen, was simply deemed “young enough”. No science or consideration to individuals’ right to choose was applied or contemplated. Each was a corporate edict for the nonsense that is proscribed as the “greater good”. The same lack of basis was approximated in 2001 when Great Britain almost paved the way to the “program’s” supreme goal “21”. If legislation for the age of consent (now beyond marriage, of course) set at twenty one had passed, the rest of the world (an extension of Great Britain) would have been doomed to follow, eventually. In other words, legislations are arbitrary measures. Construction of a “group identity” model permitting only standardised values and behaviours for standardisation’s sake is the selfish result. Given the raft of evidence, even a slothful fool should determine this always has been (albeit in varied forms) the plan; though few “in power” would dare agree or admit to their repugnant deceitfulness.

The reason the powers have dimly promoted their numerous nurturing society “concepts” (even though society does anything but nurture) is messages are designed to make the opposite of truth “appear” truthful. In fact categorisation/classification of [designate] children supports a global social enslavement program (one of numbers of cultural adjustment frameworks that are currently processed simultaneously and connected via the World Wide Web and other international exchanges). In effect, each synthesised cycle is designed to break children into new gormless adult slaves as asset-worthy (“useful”) fodder to man the system. Per this design, children are instructed fantasy is more plausible than truth, though (thankfully) not every teacher plays dumb.

Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood.

Individuals (making up the majority) that are determined to be law abiding (patriotic) become effective prisoners in their own open society. Sexual repression invariably leads to differing communication problems between sexes and, to a certain degree, estranges relations. The miraculous presupposed instant transition from impertinent scripted childhood to “proficient” adulthood does not prepare the way for pretty society. Each new insolent, spoilt, self-centred, experience lacking generation of “adults” attempts to crudely push its way up the queue. Many have predictably abused their supposed “right” to say no and have been conditioned into thinking any (and all) natural sexual acts are “theoretical” forms of rape. Few adults will contend there are only determinations to be and no “rights” at all (a fact the “program” callously capitalises on).

Culturally male/female roles/mindsets have not kept pace with everything else that has been going on in the background (i.e. systemic shredding of individualistic natural sexual dignity). One consequence is men and women are still destined for classical marital unions (even if not in name). Men, per this profile, must seek sexual gratification and women should provide the opportunity (i.e. male hunters, female prey). However, because women now collaterally (i.e. “the great group”) envisage all sex acts as “potential” forms of rape, they have been given an enormous degrading power.

In their administrative capacity, they can permit undignified sexual acts with whomever they choose, when legitimate and “legal”. Downgraded social ethics have had the effect of dragging all women down to the realms of whoredom (or celibacy for dissenters). Any whore’s power is her “right” to administer sex “favours”. “Program” masters know this full well. Their “combobulation” child exploitation takes whoredom away from the spotlight. Thus, the modern day whore cannot traffic (an exploit variant) him or herself. He or she must traffic another or others. Prostitution, from the time it was labelled “the oldest profession”, has been effervescently legitimised. “Populist” anger has specifically shifted from attacking prostitution in general to the [predominantly phantom] child sex industry. This is not to say “decent society” is comfortable with prostitution, but affairs of the flesh do not antagonise in the way they used to.

Physiologically, the only morally valid justifications behind any prohibitions of sexual acts might be on grounds of “lack of fertility” or body “immaturity” (which would provide basis for the mother of debates if tackled sincerely). Those proven unfertile could be justifiably deemed sexually unaccountable and, providing “procreation” was seen as the only functional benchmark for that type of communication, it could be outlawed to satisfy the requirements range outlined. There is actually quite a big degree of variance in apt statistical data on this arena. The youngest “woman” (on record) ever to birth a child was aged six. Women, in general, may begin their menstrual cycles from about age nine. Men are late risers with the ability to ejaculate prevalent usually from about age thirteen. The youngest father (for my research) is listed as aged eleven.

According to “nature” (reflective of God), a sexual metamorphosis demonstrably takes place in women at age nine and men of age thirteen. Thus, an uncomfortable surplus of wilderness years in respect of current legal accountability should be duly noted. Wilderness years, in the case of women, number nine. For men there are five years. How is this legal accountability in any way, shape or form naturally legitimate? By the time an average woman turns eighteen half her life has been sexual. God’s blessing has been terrorised and abused by society’s ignorance and abject subservience to the “program”. Terrorist peers foist the consequences of their foul laws on the trembling masses producing barely a shudder of dissent. Yet all should be acutely aware that these measures are designed purely to degrade the majesty of sexual intercourse to further scope for the production of “efficient” human “automatons”. Killing off stagnant populations is a fringe benefit.

When a woman turns eighteen, psychologically, nothing changes. Her mindset is still the same as it was before. She had been sexual but to be sexual was to “sin” (a pharisaic Judaic preconception) and this was “forbidden” (fruit). She was sexual but, as nothing has actually changed, to be sexual now IS to “sin”. There is one difference and it’s a big one. It is the power of control. Before she could illegitimately offer sexual consent or forbidden fruit (opening the door to all sorts of nasty blackmail scenarios) and now she can legitimately grant sexual consent as the fruit is ripe (opening the door to all sorts of nasty “double standards”). This is how sexual women have been reduced to whoredom.

Men have paid the price too. The perverse game we call politics impinges on all male values. Those that are not avowed celibates are rapists-in-waiting. Under foul terms as these, any man that dares to succumb to sexual urges can and will be accused of theoretical rape. This is all courtesy of modern social-conditioning mechanisms geared to elevating fantasy. The average woman now believes she always has the “right” to determine which “rapes” are permissible. She can also change her mind. That is the modern woman’s “privilege”. Women that kowtow with the “program”, in deference to God, lampoon our most uncharitable, sacrilegious, sanctimonious system of order. It is a system that relies on the deceit, dishonesty and partisan biased judgement of its user base. Never forget, all laws polarise judgement.

The crux of the arguments (ever so rarely in plain sight) supporting age legislation tend to rely on [corrupt] academic standards as “justification” for categorisations in place. Never mentioned are the numerous early teens “prodigies” put through the university system early. These are the anomalies that frustrate the “program”. The maturity gap, when inspected in detail, is far larger than most would imagine. For example, in relatively recent times a six year old British boy was heralded as the new oils (painting) master. Back in the 1980’s a petulant pup became a self-made millionaire (when being a millionaire meant something) in computers before he had reached his tenth year.

Martha Argerich’s (a celebrated Argentine virtuoso) notorious 1949 first public performance of the piano solo of Beethoven’s first concerto when she was seven years old presents an interpretation that would put most adults to shame. There is an account of a nine year old girl who successful singlehandedly reared the surviving family for several weeks after her mother died. Only lack of money ultimately frustrated her course. Given these facts, age legislation is indisputably unfair. Why is it supported so widely and so staunchly by our trembling masses?

There is a simple answer sadly seemed beyond the lateral comprehension of ordinary folk. In fact the answer has already been substantively outlined. People are generally pathetically weak and lazy. The largest, most incessantly in focus voices always seem to grab the limelight, founding “opinions” as they go. Mass Medias, therefore, control the way people generally think. Yes there are occasional dissenters, but, generally speaking, mass Medias tend to push (control) the populist view. That is because supporting broadcasters employed by mass Medias are people too. Broadcasters are not significantly different to any average man on the street. They too are mostly weak and lazy and don’t like to think too deeply about “obvious” issues. Of course, on the other hand, if the majority mysteriously morphed into dissenters, mass Medias would disappear as fast as they appeared and the “program” would perhaps have to engage dogmatic religion to shore up cultural adjustments once more.

Weakness and laziness by themselves do not cement opinions that are used to back legislation, such as edicts supporting age restrictions. People act because they feel empowered by acting. There is a fundamental perceived payoff for parents that support the synthetic dividers separating proscribed “children” from “adults”. The payoff is controlling power. Being the boss or “king” must be regarded as the pinnacle of empowerment and, consequentially, families have been moulded into control hierarchies. Perhaps this has always been the case. For as long as historic memory records, periodic shifts to varied standards used to justify different age categorisations have been relatively seamless. That, by no stretch of the imagination, makes wrongright”.

We must never underestimate conditioning mechanisms in the background geared to advancing false status-quo. Currently, each new crop of sexual children is deliberately immersed in cultures of facile restriction. Years long torment offers the vague promise of “freedom” (age eighteen “adulthood”). Developmental pressure builds from “terrible teens” to graduation. Many have willingly tried to believe in law and order to be patriotic (one of the group). They never rebelled. They never came to terms with what they had been denied. They never attempted to discover. Therefore, the majority of emerging and new adults bitterly support a terrorising system because they were “forced” into making sacrifice themselves.

In other words, pathetically weak adults will go to any lengths to wreak revenge on their kith and kin simply to appease their own failed ethical development. If you cannot honour yourself, how is it possible to behave responsibly to others? The great tragedy is [it seems] that people are incapable of recognising their sexuality or, to a greater degree, understanding how corporate interests stole their natural development. If age standards defining adulthood were radically shifted upwards to say forty years as the new age of consent, I do not believe there would be any major rebellion (after the first generation targeted was out of mind’s way). Old habits die hard, so I will concede the “powers” would have a hell of a marketing task ahead of them. How to convince all those marginalised people that merely want to behave naturally they are “wrong” to do so?

I have already outlined that British legislation tabled an increase to age twenty one in 2001, so why stop there? If the predominant cause behind age laws is nothing short of a population control/reduction measures, then (given the ever rising masses) logic suggests further increases are going to be ushered in. (Subtly ignoring the ethics nightmare exposing the true face of industrialism) China’s austere corporate experiment permitting only one child per family unit predictably failed dismally. Then again, if you can forbid sovereign adults “sexual license” by labelling them as “children” in legislation, the outlaw of procreation satisfies an expansion of the eugenics mantra. Ages twenty five and thirty marked traditional ancient Roman and Jewish commencement of maturity. Age fifty is of religious significance in Tibetan culture (and generally classed as the start of “middle age” in the west). Seventy five is another modern western classification milestone representing maturity or “old age”.

There potentially is no upper limit. Perhaps in the future sexual permits will be kept to octogenarians, the well-to-do that satisfy legal “exemptions” (loopholes) and “approved” (sanctioned) whores (to “service” the well-to-do)? Slavish automatons would do well to understand that each (fiendish) plan can only be stymied by the lack of faith of its designers. Confidence in communication is everything, but that is ultimately largely backed by compliance test initiatives. A sound pitch bolsters faith and the rest can be left to chance. What better target to exploit than “the family”? By turning corporate-political objectives into “family planning” advice, devious powers have cast a brilliant initiative. Families can now blame themselves for government issues and most will be oblivious to the fact. Admittedly a few have been waking up to the truth that “schooling” is actually social indoctrination in drag. But is this enough to spur momentum towards worldwide clear vision and outright revolution?

Times have changed greatly. In England years ago when attitudes were different, the age of consent was still sixteen. People could and did enter into marital unions at that age. These were normally sexual unions too. But that was trivial because teenagers (prevalently over twelve years old) also commonly interacted sexually. Legally underage pregnancies were unsurprisingly not particularly scarce. Ironically and sadly, the great “outrage” was against additional “family burden” as the young were obliged to be indoctrinated at school and few would have had the influence to earn “breadwinning money”. To me it shows just how pitifully inherently selfish people are. If only the vigour applied to blame and transference was directed at taking ownership of problems and compassionate dedication to delivery of lasting real solutions, then societies might be something to be proud of.

A long time ago, when I was fifteen, my mother asked my father to give me some sex advice. I vividly remember how he approached the cause. “You know all about it [sex], don’t you son?” He stammered, confidently. I nodded back wisely, as I had been the proud owner of a well-thumbed “hard core” adult magazine from age fourteen. Indeed, the pages were so well loved; they had come away from the staples in places. The point being is my father was too embarrassed to broach the subject of sex with me. It remained the unspoken understanding for as long as he lived. He used to use euphemisms like “it’s as easy as riding a bike” when he knew I kept damned well falling off. This is the norm, I’m told. Occasional controlling parents spew their ill-founded opinions. The rest offer silence when the silly puns run out.

Controlling parents aim to censor inappropriate behaviours. These might include masturbation in public. A Talmudic branch of Christianity called the Baptist Church (traditionally) labels masturbation a “sin”. Offspring of Baptist families are surely dealt all sorts of psychological blows unless they adjust to being exceptionally deceitful.  When I was very young I remember all the local kids in my playgroup used to occasionally interact with [vaguely sexual] truth or dare games. My own junior sister was particularly prolific in her formative years. We lived in a rural Jacobean period farmhouse which had a winding spiral staircase to the upper floors. Between beams my father had lodged makeshift cream chipboard panels to form walls and these made as excellent “scribbling” white boards.

One day, after a rather heated discussion with my mother, my sister (then age six) drew a biro cartoon of a “matchstick” couple copulating to prove she knew about sex. I am not sure it was a masterpiece but it was technically sufficient for the purposes under scrutiny, earning an immediate deletion under a double layer of white paint. Interestingly my mother never punished my sister for that and said nothing more on the subject. What could she be “punished” for? Knowing the truth? It seems fitting to roll out Krishna’s immoral quote (a regular visitor to this website) once more, “Spirituality brings to freedom whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What would Krishna have said about modern day paedophilia hysterics?

Perhaps it is no accident that the powers behind their mischief “program” sometimes refer to themselves as the Annunaki Brotherhood. The Order’s iconography depicts a thick braided cross trapped by an unbroken wicker circle. Cosmically, a cross represents path choices but the circle closes off any avenue of inquisitive exploration. The icon, therefore, is the “prison planet” or Zionism symbol. It sets paralysis standards (put into motion by pharisaic usurpers); the ones Krishna described as “evil”. Social paralysis begins with restriction of will [of the child] to confuse the mind (spiritual centre) in order to produce broken, de-spiritualised adults (slaves by any other name). To socially outlaw sexuality is to remove the most fundamental of all birth rights. Bodies without minds are only capable of following orders.

But there is more. Few are aware of the true potence of sexual self-esteem. Potent life is contained in the chakra governing the erogenous zones from conception. Those that deliberately superficially attack sexual developmental behaviour aim to create literal zombies – walking dead!