My last post predominantly focused on the current Ebola crisis. Some time back I mentioned that the 1960’s was such a traumatic period for the globalists, that 1971-75 was devoted to rehashing 25 year [policy] plans which might impact the next millennia. That is why the Trilateral Commission (TC) was formed in 1973 by David Rockefeller, officially, as an “informal ideas forum”. However, the (currently) 87 strong membership list pretty much runs policy for US, UK, West Germany, and Japan and so on with respect to Globalist objectives. The familiar catchphrase, “problem, reaction, solution” used to manage human cattle is more precisely a management of reactions and responses. Therefore when something happens, an event, there is an outcome which sees a reaction, potentially, and, if so, there is a response. Some events are fizzers. A reaction was planned, but the cattle stayed lethargic. They didn’t “get it”. In this case, it would be time for the prodders. A short, sharp shock will wake any docile beast; a mini blitzkrieg to put the fear of God into fertile, uninformed imaginations.
With respect to the Ebola virus, along the lines of this template, there is no Ebola virus. None has ever been isolated, so the only evidence for Ebola is “Ebola symptoms” because the virus has not been discovered. This is a similar case for HIV which, we have learned, does not cause AIDS. There is a link, because, just as with Ebola there is a strong case to say that the medication actually causes illness and possible death. For HIV it was the toxic, shelved, “chemo” drug AZT. The Globalists certainly do not invest in medication that is not going to be used. Therefore, if it does not work, or it is highly dangerous, a toxic poison, it will be used by hook or by the crooks. The only exception to that rule is the dumping of dud, spent stocks off on suckers, such as “well meaning” African tin-pot dictators. That’s what the cattle are for; to mop up the refuse. I have subsequently learnt that Ebola might be caused by pesticides, pollution, a species of snake poison and Typhoid medication. Most recently of all however, an interesting article appeared exposing a deliberate attempt to contaminate the water systems in Liberia. Formaldehyde in large enough quantities will induce “Ebola like symptoms”. It is interesting the current “outbreak” allegedly started in Liberia. We must also consider the effects of a toxic “experimental” vaccine on poor African suffers. So negatively potent was the solution, that mobs raided their hospitals to remove the sick. We saw the reaction. The Globalist response was to send in the American military to issue “medication” (sic) at gunpoint. Finally, of course, we will never forget that the Ebola strain (which has never been isolated and does not exist) was patented by the CDC in 2009 (the year Julie Gerberding moved from the CDC to Merck Vaccines) and implicates Bill Gate’s “philanthropy”. Why?
In the US we learn that alleged Ebola “positive” staged quarantines are not recognised by family members and, at least one has links to the CDC and Obama administration. Eleven TC members have administration posts in the current Obama government. Jon Rappoport, a blogger I follow, kindly reminded us that pandemic “strategy” is the scripted response resulting from the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 exercise (after all that had happened in 2009), “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. Pandemic strategy was consolidated after the mother of all reactions to the Swine Flu. Though the virus (assuming it exists) formally killed 22, the CDC laid claim to millions of infections and deaths. This promoted another manipulator (connected to the globalist International Monetary Fund [IMF]), World Health Organisation (WHO), to respond by giving the swine flu its highest “terror rating” – category 6. A deliberate strategy of making people sick and then sending in the medics to heal them seems to have been in place prior to the 1960’s, perhaps starting after World War II. Ebola has shocked me, not because it is unconscionable to manipulate in that way, but because my memory did not work.
My memory had been manipulated. Before I discuss the reason, it is important to note that error is a blessed thing when it is recognised. As a concert trained pianist, I have come to determine that at the very point I say, “I know”, I don’t. Students and teachers share a common preoccupation with un-knowledge. Our job is to commute un-knowledge into knowledge. Then, whether students or teachers, we have done our job. Dutiful acceptance of lack of intellectual status produces genii. Our scientific community; those puffed windbags that buster credentials whilst failing to fathom the simplest certainty, is the sad tribute to terminal memory manipulation. These people are junkies. Corporate pushers brazenly conspire with the mainstream educators doling out money and fame to the hapless addicts willing to destroy their brains for prosperity. The reason my memory failed was due to manipulative programming; the same programming spineless scientist propagandists willingly subject themselves to.
I have already mentioned the 1960’s was a critical awakening for humanity. Vietnam collapsed because for the first time ever, in hereditary memory, there was mass dereliction of duty. American troops were fighting a war and a percentage felt that they were the enemy. Whereas there was some sympathy for the plight of the Germans by some troops in the First and Second World Wars, because “they” look like “us”, it was not usually enough to dissuade “patriotic” duty. In fact, due to leadership incompetence, it is always the oppressed soldiers that carry the machine. In 1960 the people rebelled; in more ways than one. That changed the world and sent the old guard into a spin. 1971-75 saw a frantic effort to reassess globalisation elevating “young gun” “masterminds” like Rockefeller protégé, Zbigniew Brzezinski. The world needed a fresh perspective and that is what it got. Rockefeller had earlier (back in 1952) been behind the establishment of the Robertson Panel by the CIA, which promulgated into the reluctant cataloguing Project Blue Book which was designed to ridicule the vast majority of Unclassified Flying Object (UFO) sightings by censoring or routinely dismissing anything that could be reported effectively. In conjunction, Eisenhower (the president that lied about the Holocaust to relaunch Israel) established a special body to study phenomena. This is euphemistically known as the Majestic-12, as that was the code name. It consisted of twelve famous scientists (that presumably were not propagandists). To underscore Rockefeller’s power, he allegedly has inherited Tesla’s famous “death ray” that could freeze entire armies or population bodies.
Therefore it is no surprise, to me, that Rockefeller, via the auspices of the Trilateral Commission, dictated globalisation policy from 1973. The ultimate plan is to have global federalism overseen by one administrative body (which is currently, theoretically, split by the United Nations and Israel). For globalisation to be effective there can be only one currency and that would ideally be electronic, per that mindset. According to Jon Rappoport, a TC insider came clean via the mainstream media in 1978. President Jimmy Carter, at the time, did not construct foreign policy. They did. 1979 saw the erection of the Georgia guide stones, dictating the way it was going to be (from the globalist’s perspective). 1975 predictably heralded the official end of the Vietnam War (although fighting continued) as a new 25 year plan had been drafted. 1977 brandished the discovery of a new mysterious virus in Africa that killed just about everything in its wake. This was the Ebola virus and that is how I remember it – from young teen TV recollections. It kills 95% in a few days. They said. I remember a thin built balding guy praising the doctors that saved him. He was one of the ones that pulled through. They said it was like Tuberculosis on steroids, turning blood black and disintegrating organs. We all believed it. It was over there. We were safe.
Ebola was hardly a distant memory when HIV/AIDS sprung up. I think the year of “discovery” (as we know, like Ebola nothing has actually been discovered – only ‘effects’ of carnage) was 1983 and it quickly became the Gay Plague backed by an incessant global anti-sex, anti-promiscuity propaganda campaign. This saw such an acceptance of prophylactics, encouraged by the sex industries, $billion condom sales followed with specialist stores springing up. It was also a subtle attack on Rosicrucian order (Catholicism). AZT was so successful in converting HIV (if it exists) into AIDS; in 1988 the Council of Rome (another masonic “policy forum”) decided it would be a great idea to manufacture poison vaccines to kill off tracts of the population “as and when necessary”. A separate front was managed by the Freudian (materialistic) American Psychiatric Association reclassifying the prior behavioural classification, “Post Encephalitic Behavioural Disorder” twice. The first change, “Attention Deficit Disorder” (ADD), happened in 1980. This was amended to “Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder” in 1987. Agreed some additional “symptoms” (behaviour traits) were added, but why change the name? The reason was “marketing”. It made bipolar disorder easier to “sell”. Bipolar disorder was created in 1980 and is the means that Special Operatives use to select clandestine recruits for special operations like the Foot Hood attack. A little hint to those suffering from memory manipulation; theoretically everyone is bipolar.
I would like to conclude this post by returning to the theme of Jesus. A few readers of The Truth about Jesus will have chanted “he’s got no evidence” under the breath trying to drown out any rational thought that might hinder memory manipulation. I am forever amazed that billions of human beings sincerely believe utter nonsense because either laziness, preconditioning or general ignorance forbids them to be anything less than willing recruits of propaganda. The fact, in this case, that Jesus manufactured his own myths is all the more sweet. It is my sincere opinion that every “fact” about Jesus’ natural (non-ministerial) life was in fact about his father’s natural life. But now is time to provide more background. The Truth about Jesus only took readers part of the way.
My earlier comment about Rosicrucian order and the Catholic Church may have taken a few by surprise. The reason the earliest traceable edition of Fama Fraternitatis, the original Rosicrucian manifesto, first appeared in 1614 is prior to that the Tudors (British Royal House) were the embodiment of order. Henry VIII’s divorce of Catherine of Aragon was more than it seemed. His preoccupation with a son and heir was merely a smoke screen (although it does also highlight the preoccupation with control through bloodlines). The trouble is rather than reinstating the Celtic, Druidic systems of paganism (a pantheism hybrid), he chose Zion. This Zion was a form of atheism as Henry was renowned for plundering churches. We know from his sixth wife, Catherine Parr, whose writings attempt to make peace with God, that the king was not a spiritual man. His daughter, the iron queen, “Elizabeth I” does have a connection with the Priory of Sion (a variation of Zionism) through her illegitimate son, Francis Bacon (who Maree Moore argues was also the infamous Comte de Saint Germain). Though the, then, objectives of the Priory of Sion were radically different to today’s “Zionism”, it was a step on the path to what we call “now”.
Turning the clock back 1500 years, I am compelled to agree with Maree Moore’s speculation that the Culdee (Celtic Jew), Joseph of Arimathea, was located at Glastonbury for the year we call 37AD. Though I know of no other writings supporting the fact, I am also compelled to believe that Joseph saved Jesus’ (Josephus’) father, Matthias, by intervening in either 30AD or 32AD. The out of place description of Jesus attacking the money changers (Matthew 21:12-13) has been blamed on Barabbas. Various candidates have been submitted, including two of the brothers of Jesus. However, I say Barabbas was the codename of Matthias and Matthew’s account did not belong (as a history of Jesus/Josephus). There is a record of a minor agitator in the Roman annuls. I believe this was Matthias. The seriousness of the charges would have been lessened as, in my opinion; Matthias may have been in his 20’s at the time. Whereas the Jews saw a coming of age at 30, for the Romans it was 25. It was possible he was actually slightly older (perhaps 26-28), but an exaggeration could have been made in his favour to apply relative leniency. This calculates the birth of Matthias at around 4AD. However, Luke wrote of pregnant Mary’s (mother of Jesus) need to attend the Roman census of Quirinius of 6AD. Although in this case Matthias’ mother has been substituted by “virgin” Mary, it would place him at 24-26 in 30-32AD.
Whereas I am aware that more than one expert on Roman history (and law) has stated that Jesus did nothing to warrant his supposed crucifixion, I believe there was an event. Using my imagination, I could well see one of the money changers’ attempting to defend his property killed in the process. There is our reason. In the meantime, the Romans invaded Britain in 43AD. This was after a number of plans to invade had been thwarted from around 55BC onwards. Diplomacy had worked and the Romans had been receiving tribute from Britain for many years. The reason the Romans invaded was to impose money on the Celts as the first step of planned globalisation, which involved standardised taxation across the federation. Nevertheless, the Celts did not buy money and it took the Magna Carta of 1215 to finally break their will and usher in the age of feudalism. New order began in 1493. Few are aware, but between 55BC and 43AD, Britain was the jewel of Europe (and not some barbarian backwater). Reputedly there were upwards of eighty mystery schools and colleges of the special arts. Britain was a popular education destination for the then families of rich and famous.
The Emperors Caligula and Nero both receive a mention in The Truth about Jesus. I did not mention that Britain, translated from Hebrew, means “Covenant Man” or the “People of the Covenant”. Therefore, Britain is the Land of the Covenant. Israelite links with Ireland stretch back prior to 500BC with the Prophet Jeremiah visiting on a number of occasions. As Britain was the Land of the Covenant, the fact must have been recognised long prior to 37AD (with relics, such as the Stone of Destiny, in situ). Indeed royal lineages may have all had blood ties to Israel (though the current Queen of England is arguably an imposter that has never been crowned – formally). We learnt that Emperor Nero was all in all a beastly character, but there is something odd about him. Historically, he becomes Emperor in 54AD and allegedly commits acts of overt homosexuality on his victory parade. Reputedly, he also had sex with his own mother, Agrippina at some point or, perhaps, many points. I am frankly compelled to assume more than a degree of salacious artistic license has been devoted to that negative portrayal. If Nero did behave that way, it would certainly have very much been behind closed doors. It also suggests that the writers of “history” may have been recruited and funded by overseers of Orders “anti-Rome” who, just as today, would have lied when necessary. I believe neither Nero nor Caligula were “perverts” of any note (more so than the “journalists” of the time). Instead we are witnessing mischievous word crafting to manipulate the memory.
The Roman invasion of Britain in 43AD was a relatively quiet affair, but it was only after Nero’s ascension, the trouble started. According to Tacitus, there was wanton slaughter of Druids on Mona (Anglesea) by the troops of Gaius Seutonius Paulinus either 60 or 61AD. This was met with a short lived rebellion from the Welsh Queen, Boudica (or Boudicca), crushed by 62AD (Battle of Watling Street, possibly somewhere in Shropshire) to the overwhelming approval of Nero. Let us think back and remember the “special relationship” Joseph of Arimathea had with the Welsh Druids for his tin mining export operation. Surely he was not the only Culdee with a base on the Land of the Covenant? “Austere measures” by Nero led to the Jerusalem rebellion for the Passover 66AD. In that precise same year Nero expelled all Philosophers and Gnostics from Rome. One, Appollonius, had previously seen a vision of the temple of Rome in flames and had been charged with high treason (as he was seen as a “planner” or in some way linked to Gnostic terrorists). According to “history”, in his final act of madness, Historically, Nero burnt Rome to the ground in 64AD. Yet this was logically a terrorist attack managed by the same front that wrote “history” (like today’s 9/11). History states he committed suicide in 68AD in the noteworthy style fitting this charade but, equally credibly, he merely rescinded power by disappearing to the safety of anonymity (as did Jesus). Hints in the writings of Tacitus suggest he was a true socialist that was hated by the oligarchy of all persuasions. Though he is “historically” remembered as an immoral, perverse clown renowned for conspiring with poisonous alchemists, for me he shines as one who took on the system exiting with refined dignity when the time was right (reading between the lines). Given the reputation of our very own Shimon Peres, poison is found both in the blood and pens of our Pharisee masters. Continuing, interestingly, the Flavian dynasty succeeded power in 69AD (December).
Emperor Vespasian was a blood relative of Josephus (whose ministry as Jesus ended with the ascension [of Vespasian], “coincidentally”) and, therefore, must have been an ally of the Gnostics. Troubles in Jerusalem predictably evaporated. I am sceptical as to whether the orthodox “historic” account of Jerusalem’s demise in 70AD has any credence other than it highlights the Sanhedrin was definitely abolished never to return. Why was the Sanhedrin abandoned, in truth? Was it because globalisation was complete and power had already been transferred to Rome? The “destruction of Jerusalem” may have been code confirming the removal of elements that had previously obstructed the progress of the Essene/Roman union. Those obstructive “elements”, ironically, are likely the ones that now occupy the power vacuum that exists today. Much has happened since Roman times. Either way, my detestation of the vain, unfair laws created and sold on the back of exaggerated, biased and flawed logic have always been a blessing to the elite. For it is they that are welcome to murder, kidnap and rape. This is not to say the elite, broadly speaking, behave barbarically as that is risky (particularly for those that fall out of favour), but there are some that are notably above the law. When reason, true logic and fairness are applied, everyone should be above the law. Pharisaic order oppresses because it can. James the Just (brother of Josephus) became a casualty of the battle between old (a variation of current Catholic) and new Gnostic order. He was left to tend the roost (now called the first Bishop of Jerusalem) and was stoned to death by the Pharisees in 69AD, just before Roman retribution. The current Israelite establishment (hereditary Pharisees) refuse to recognise James’ bone box even though it is authentic. That is their level of hatred. Does anyone wonder what the connection is with radical Islam and our modern hereditary Pharisaic order?
“He who shall cast the first stone….”
I am thinking of adding a “tip jar”, not to “go commercial” (god forbid!) but, being one of the slaves, an income stream would allow more time to be devoted to this pastime such as editing (sic). Feedback is welcome; positive or negative.