The Science of Existence

I have been doing more work on my book Dimensions, Deceptions and Demons and this, sadly, has taken precedence over blogging. As the introduction and first chapter sound more like science philosophy manuals dealing with macro and quantum physics scenarios, I have decided to issue another sneak preview:

In the beginning there was the word and the word was God”.

Before I broach the complex and convoluted subject of exo-politic affairs, it is important to form an understanding of how and, to all intents and purposes, why we are here. Though few of us might appear to have direct relationships with exo-politics, we are all connecting through a combination of history as representative of our multi-faceted symbiotic presence and the future in its relationship to the past and present. Without fundamentally understanding the nature of man, the reader may as well give up any quest into the exploration of exo-political enlightenment. Dimensions, densities, demons and Earthly deceptions are intrinsically connected. For an even rudimentary understanding we must start at the very beginning before, presumably, there was anything; when the “word was God”. The reader, while reading, must also not lose sight of the fact that, on so many levels, we are not a single process or single thought, but a the culmination of an extraordinary journey stretching back to the very start which is likely to have begun at the end. Everything is as it was and will always be regardless of rudimentary changes as a consequence of this journey. Every single body is a cooperation of an infinite number of ideas, each jostling for position. The winners, in position, are the manifestation we call life.

Those aware of gnostic philosophy are blessed. Gnostic philosophy is surprisingly accurate. More importantly, it moves away from traditional structures like atoms, molecules, organisms and so on. Instead it discusses creation in emotional terms. If anything, the building blocks were the finished products, as the components were irrelevant. How the designer and builder of horns or hooves did it, was unimportant as, to the experiencer, a horn is a horn and not an immense group of atoms inadvertently glued together. The important thing is horns and hooves were designed and did not accidentally materialise or miraculously evolve. So-called evolution merely catalogues changes. It records the symptoms and science creates its make-believe as a consequence. Improvement is a presumption; which is not to say some lateral changes were not better or a retrospective improvement. Nevertheless improvement per se is not in any way evidence for evolution unless that improvement is systemic and continuous.

Exo-politics goes beyond bodies and we learn of extra-dimensional forms and/or some entities which do not possess physical bodies. Some argue that dimensions eight to ten (D8-10) consist of pure thought. Under those conditions such entities would neither possess physical bodies or form that conform to scientific convention and, as such, are beyond the fathom of science reasoning. Therefore in this case readers will discover ancient documents such as the Gnostic Nag Hammadi scrolls become the manuals for extra-existence.  For instance, in material found in the Apocryphon of John, the Gospel of the Egyptians and other books a focus is devoted to the creation of metaphysical states, emotions and devices. Conclusions drawn determine that without “logos” or “thought” nothing could have begun and that is why, “In the beginning there was the word.” Thought may not have personified words, as such, but merely was the “awareness of one”. Though the power of one has become infinite in capacity and potential, it was always one and was not always aware. We call this the prime source.

Prior to thought, that which existed had no comprehension as it was what was and there was nothing that could invoke comprehension other than its awareness through thought. The thought could have only have been produced as a reaction to bliss, for bliss is bliss. Importantly, behind the thought was the impetus to think. Both Buddhists and Gnostics have taken this for granted. Impetus preceded thought. Without a reference point there can be no causality. In other words, for bliss to have needed to think there must have been a motivator. Once thought came into being, in a sense irrationally or unnaturally, there was only one possible outcome. That outcome was a chain reaction that has reached the point we call the present today, and will call the future tomorrow. The limited third party observer, like me, can only hypothesise why an all-consuming entity, consumed in bliss found an irregularity to justify beginning thought. Perhaps in its brilliant sameness, bliss became boring and the all-consuming entity needed a distraction from itself. It needed, I hypothesise, some place to explore and discover; some place to express and be. The expression “a change is as good as a rest” summarises the catalytic momentum of the first thought. The production of thought changed everything. Now standards could be based on, aligned to or graded on bliss. Bliss was the yard stick. Though it could not be improved, as it was the ultimate standard, it could be measured against other standards. From the perspective of those outside; those not in bliss, it might not be viewed as the ultimate as tastes might change. Only from the perspective of bliss, was bliss the ultimate standard. Therefore, also, those who assume bliss is their ultimate standard are forlorn.

Categorisation and zealous requirements based on introspective views and experiences have created all the problems humanity and other universal systems are facing today. There is no good or evil. Rather, opinions driven by the strongest team corrupt a group identity. Over vast, extended periods, these opinions have forged two fundamentally opposed groups. There are those who apply the synchronicity of proscribed order to the letter against the ones who passionately create. It has been, is and will be dogma versus imagination. This manifests as brute force or alternative virtuosic brilliance. The spectrum of each side runs from light to dark and dark to light, but it is always closed minds versus free thought. Nevertheless there are a range of distinct rules that no one, nothing can avoid. Whilst eminent human scientists describe their hypotheses on how everything is 99.9% nothing, they fail to comprehend that everything is 100% of everything and therefore they do not experience 99.9% of everything. That is why they label it nothing. Human science recognises a tenth of 1% of everything exists and they understand one tenth of 1% of that. That said, good science is still a blessing.

One of the reasons science only comprehends one millionth of everything is most of everything is offline and, thus, does not satisfy science standards. Most of everything is literally beyond the measurement of science. A good and simple example of this is happiness. How does science measure happiness? If I said I was 19.38% happy, could science prove or disprove it? The greater problem is science could only possibly know D3 as, according to the rules of empirics, anything outside is not real. However, if the Pleaedian light beings are correct, there are over fourteen hundred dimensions. Just about all are beyond the realms of science, but what of even D1 or D2? Empirical mathematics claims these are lines and areas complimenting its definition of the cube. Yet they are defeated by their own rules as according to empirics a line or an area cannot actually exist in a three dimensional world, for each would have to be 3D to have form. If any “side” was zero the mathematics of 3D existence does not work. Therefore a cube is “X x Y x Z”, an area is “X x Y x 0” and a line is “X x 0 x 0”. Real D1 is, in fact, an infinite pulse and D2 is an infinite pulse looped to create a force field (the illusion of solid atoms). In fact all dimensions consist of four simple elements; pulses, force fields, waves and frequencies. Similar symmetry is found in cosmic code. DNA consists of four chemical elements which, in correct combination, can create anything. There is nothing beyond the power of creation.

A big part of the creation process is perception. Indeed, without perception nothing would exist. Yes, I have heard all those Zen-style arguments about trees falling in unimagined woods which have not been witnessed. However, if there was no perception, existence would not exist because there would be no awareness of it. Perception is a cooperation of existence and awareness. In the case of human beings, the cooperation is selective. We are all surrounded by extra-dimensional entities all the time, but the majority cannot see due to flawed perception. Our perception is designed to make sense of our reality. Instinctively, therefore, we do not like change. Indeed some would go so far as denying or attacking change in order to preserve their reality. This can be extended to reasoning behind the clash of cultures where Muslims want a Muslim world or homosexuals want bi-sexuality to be normal with homosexuality the preferential example of self-expression. Currently global society is being tortured by the xenophobic exploits of Zionism, which is something that goes way beyond Judaism or any expression of faith. In fact, Zionist zeal very much connects with exo-politics.

Existence is much more complex than humanity and its science supposes. I have explained why science cannot or will not comprehend in the preceding paragraphs. Now I shall attempt to decode existence. It is important to start by saying that though we rationalise time as linear, it is anything but. In fact there is something I call blueprint time in other writings. Just as a prolific painter maps out his latest grand masterpiece, so are cornerstone events mapped into blueprint time. Time itself is series of static scenarios which might appear in chronological order should the experiencer rationalise them that way. From our rationalisation of what we generally call “reality”, blueprint time runs in the reverse direction. In other words it starts at the end and finishes at the beginning. Although this is not strictly true as it comprises a hotch-potch of unordered scenarios. Time, though, as a concept is drawn to a particular linearity which mimics the ever-presence of blueprint time. As pure time is a mix of unordered scenarios, there is no past or future. In fact it is the rationalisation of perception that personifies time going in particular directions; in our case from the known historic past to an unknown future reality. Perception has concocted the notion of time travel. As everything is in the present, providing a particular order could be deciphered from the mix, of course the experience of time travel would be possible.

Now things become rather more complex. There is certainly one blueprint time, but there may be more than one. In fact, the reason I am writing about exo-politics is because my timeline appears to be a blueprint alternative. Timelines are the realities which rationalise entities ensconced in chronological scenario connections. My reality is not exclusively me. It is shaped by the numerous external connections I build up to validate it. Those connections are as real and important as the relationship I have with myself. Because I and everything incorporated in these scenarios has free will, In order for blueprint time to remain the emphasis for chronological development, every variation from the plan sees the creation of a new timeline. These are theoretically holographic timelines. Timeline splinters only need to branch at the original points of difference. Nevertheless, this precludes the potential for more or less infinitesimal timeline variations. Some will have made relatively rapid progress (measured against the requirement of blueprint time) and others would have made next to no progress at all.

Therefore, returning to the exo-politic investigation, technologies (natural or otherwise) that allow time travel are actually bridges between timelines, whose differing chronologies present the illusion of time travel. Our science calls these bridges between timelines worm holes. As past and future scenarios are anchored in the present and unravel as per the chronology of blueprint time (probably multiple timelines), time travel is not possible (or theoretically possible as a manipulation of the prime source intelligence). However, from the linear perspective it would be possible to visit any matched segment of blueprint time at any position along the holographic timeline. There is neither a guarantee nor even a likelihood holographic timeline outcomes would match blueprint time scenarios. Because of the magnetic effect of blueprint time, which uses devices like déjà vu to steer outcomes towards planned scenarios, elements of all timelines; holographic or otherwise, contain the essence of blueprint time.

I hope you all enjoyed that…..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s